Abstract
For methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, data suggest that the clinical response is significantly better if the total vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio is ≥400. While the AUC/MIC ratio is the accepted pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index for vancomycin, this target has been achieved using multiple daily doses. We are unaware of a systematically designed dose fractionation study to compare the bactericidal activity of once-daily administration to that of traditional twice-daily administration. A dose fractionation study was performed with vancomycin in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model against an MRSA USA300 strain (MIC of 0.75 μg/ml) using an inoculum of ∼106 CFU/ml. The three vancomycin regimens evaluated for 168 h were 2 g every 24 h (q24h) as a 1-h infusion, 1 g q12h as a 1-h infusion, and 2 g q24h as a continuous infusion. Free steady-state concentrations (assuming 45% binding) for a total daily AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 were simulated for all regimens. A validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was used to determine vancomycin concentrations. Although once-daily and twice-daily dosage regimens exhibited total trough concentrations of <15 μg/ml, all regimens achieved similar bactericidal activities between 24 and 168 h and suppressed the amplification of nonsusceptible subpopulations. No colonies were found on agar plates with 3× MIC for any of the treatment arms. Overall, the results suggest that once-daily vancomycin administration is feasible from a PK/PD perspective and merits further inquiry in the clinical arena.
INTRODUCTION
Given the dual threat of diminishing vancomycin efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and recent reports of rising nephrotoxicity (10, 22) (albeit potentially due to concomitant dosing increases), new vancomycin dosing strategies are urgently needed. From a pharmacodynamic viewpoint, there is an opportunity to alter standard dosage regimens of vancomycin in clinical practice to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicity. Data suggest that killing by vancomycin is concentration dependent, and a near-maximal bactericidal effect is achieved against MRSA when the ratio of the area under the total vancomycin concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC exceeds 400 (22). While an AUC/MIC ratio of 400 is a well-recognized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target for vancomycin, this target has been determined using multiple daily doses, which has resulted in the default stance of using multiple-daily-dosing regimens in clinical practice (4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 20, 21). The possibility of once-daily administration is appealing from a PK/PD perspective, as it affords the ability to achieve more robust AUCs in a defined interval (i.e., during the first 6 to 12 h) while minimizing trough concentrations, which predicts nephrotoxicity (10). However, we are unaware of a systematically designed dose fractionation study that compared the bactericidal activity of a once-daily administration of vancomycin to that of a twice-daily administration.
Our objective was to compare the rates and extents of killing of MRSA USA300 of vancomycin regimens at 2 g/day given as a 1-h infusion every 12 h (q12h) or q24h or as a continuous infusion in a hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). To our knowledge, this is the first dose fractionation study that compared the bactericidal activity of a once-daily administration of vancomycin to that of a twice-daily administration.
(This study was presented in part at the 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, September 2011.)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates, susceptibility testing, and drug preparation.
Vancomycin analytical-grade powder was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fairlawn, NJ). A sterile stock solution of 10,000 μg/ml was prepared in sterile water, diluted and aliquoted to the appropriate concentration, and stored at −80°C. MRSA pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type USA300 (obtained as a gift from Brian Tsuji, SUNY, Buffalo, NY) was used for susceptibility testing, time-kill studies, and the HFIM. A quality control strain (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus ATCC 25925) was used only for all susceptibility testing. Both of the strains were stored at −80°C in 20% glycerol and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton II broth (MHB) (BBL, Sparks, MD). Prior to experimentation, fresh isolates were grown on Trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates with 5% sheep blood and incubated at 35°C for 24 h.
Susceptibility testing.
Susceptibility testing was performed in triplicate using broth microdilution and agar dilution methods with MHB and Mueller-Hinton agar according to CLSI guidelines (2). Dilutions were performed by arithmetic increments of 0.25 μg/ml for the MIC range of 0.25 to 2 μg/ml and increments of 1 μg/ml for MICs of ≥2 μg/ml. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined by the subculturing of broth from the microdilution wells that were previously incubated for 24 h and plated onto TSA plates.
Time-kill assay.
A 48-h time-kill experiment was conducted to evaluate the bactericidal activity of various concentrations of vancomycin against MRSA USA300. The vancomycin concentrations used in the time-kill study (0, 0.75, 2.25, 8, 16, 25, and 50 μg/ml) reflected the free-vancomycin peak and trough concentrations for the dosing regimens evaluated in the HFIM. A starting inoculum of the same density as that for the HFIM (105.8 CFU/ml) was used, and various concentrations of vancomycin were added to conical tubes. The time-kill experiment was performed in a water shaker bath at 35°C and at 100 rpm. Both MHB and drug were replaced after 24 h by the spinning of the bacterial suspension, removal of the supernatant, and resuspension in fresh (drug-containing) MHB in order to precisely maintain vancomycin concentrations and to maintain fresh MHB. Quantitative cultures were assessed at 0 h (predose) and 3, 6, 24, 27, and 48 h. Prior to the culturing of the bacterial samples on TSA agar, each sample was centrifuged and resuspended twice with normal saline to remove vancomycin.
Studies of less-vancomycin-susceptible subpopulations.
The mutation frequencies of less-susceptible subpopulations at different multiples of the MIC in agar were calculated as the ratio of the number of colonies that grew on drug-containing agar divided by the number of colonies that grew on drug-free agar, as previously described by Louie et al. (11). Briefly, aliquots of the inoculum (1 to 5 ml) were plated onto agar containing 3×, 5×, 6×, and 10× the baseline vancomycin agar MIC of the organism and incubated at 35°C. After as long as 72 h of incubation, the colonies on the plates with drug-containing medium were enumerated and compared to the colony counts of the total bacterial population previously assessed at 24 h. Due to the limited bacterial growth on plates with 5×, 6×, and 10× MIC (data not shown), plates with 3× MIC were used to determine the mutational frequency and less-susceptible subpopulations in the HFIM. Determinations of mutation frequencies at 3× MIC were performed on at least four separate occasions.
Hollow-fiber infection model.
A description of the hollow-fiber bioreactor (cellulosic cartridge; FiberCell System, Inc., Fredrick, MD) was detailed previously (24). Along with vancomycin being injected into the central compartment, a continuous flow of fresh MHB was also infused in order to represent the human simulated terminal half-life of vancomycin. In order to maintain an isovolumetric environment, MHB was removed from the central reservoir into a waste reservoir via a peristaltic pump (Masterflex; Cole-Palmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL). In order to inoculate the HFIM, MRSA was injected and confined to the hollow-fiber cartridge (i.e., the extracapillary space of the hollow-fiber system). Broth medium including nutrients and vancomycin was exchanged by the rapid intercompartmental clearance between the central reservoir and the hollow-fiber cartridge.
Schedule-response experiment.
A dose fractionation study was performed in duplicate with the same MRSA USA300 isolate using the HFIM in a humidified incubator at 35°C. The isolate was taken from a −80°C freezer and subcultured twice on TSA plates prior to the preparation of the bacterial suspension. The inoculum was prepared by taking 3 to 5 freshly grown midsize colonies and placing them into fresh MHB at 35°C. The inoculum was grown to the logarithmic state and diluted with MHB to approximately 105.8 CFU/ml; this was measured with a spectrophotometer at an optical density of 630 nm.
Twelve milliliters of the inoculum was injected into the peripheral port of each of the four hollow-fiber cartridges. The four cartridges (for each of the two experiments) consisted of a growth control (drug free) and three vancomycin dosing arms that were designed to achieve a total AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 over 168 h. The three vancomycin regimens simulated the steady-state human concentrations of unbound vancomycin at a percent protein binding of 45% (1, 26). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters and creatinine clearance (CLCR) values for these vancomycin regimens were derived from a vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model (6, 17, 18). A glomerular filtration rate of 88 ml/min to reflect elderly patients with normal renal function yielded a total vancomycin clearance rate of 5.0 liters/h. For a daily dose of 2 g, this yielded a total drug AUC of 400 μg · h/ml and an unbound AUC of 220 μg · h/ml. The half-life simulated in the HFIM was approximately 4.8 h. The vancomycin dosing arms of 1 g every 12 h, 2 g every 24 h (intermittent 1-h infusion), and 2 g every 24 h (continuous infusion) were achieved by simulating peak non-protein-bound (free) drug concentrations of 30.5, 18.2, and 9.2 μg/ml (16). To achieve the targeted half-life for vancomycin, the central compartment volume was 485 ml, and the medium within the compartment was isovolumetrically replaced with fresh MHB at a flow rate of 1.17 ml/min. Samples for the determination of vancomycin concentrations for each of the drug-containing arms were acquired at ≥12 different time points, mainly within the first 48 h, from the drug sampling port of the central reservoir. These concentrations were later confirmed with a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method performed at the Ordway Research Institute (Albany, NY).
Viable counts of the total population were determined at 0 h (predose) and 6, 24, 30, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. Viable counts of the less-susceptible population(s) on plates with 3× MIC were determined every 24 h. Samples of the inoculum were washed twice with normal saline to minimize drug carryover. The samples were serially diluted 10-fold in normal saline and cultured onto TSA for each of the time points. Agar plates were incubated for 24 h (TSA plates) or 72 h (vancomycin agar plates) at 35°C. A volume of 200 μl was plated for all samples for which the lower limit of detection was 6 colonies (1.5 log10 CFU/ml).
To determine susceptibility and, therefore, to confirm the development of resistance, determinations of MICs were performed in duplicate with colonies that were obtained at each time point from each experimental arm, excluding the control arm.
LC/MS/MS assay.
The samples (vancomycin in MHB) were diluted with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) water (0.050-ml sample in 1.00 ml of a 50:50 dilution of methanol-water) and were analyzed by LC/MS/MS. The LC/MS/MS system was comprised of a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system and a Thermo Scientific TSQ Vantage LC/MS/MS system.
Chromatographic separation was performed by using a Thermo Scientific Hypersil C8 column, a 5 μm, 50- by 3.0-mm column, and a mobile phase consisting of 85% 5 mM ammonium acetate (pH 3.5) and 15% methanol at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. Vancomycin concentrations were obtained by use of LC/MS/MS, monitoring the MS/MS transition from m/z 725 (doubly charged ion) to m/z 144. The analysis run time was 5.0 min. The assay was linear over a range of 0.05 to 50.0 μg/ml (r2 > 0.995). The interday precision (percent coefficient of variation [%CV]) for the quality control samples (which were analyzed in triplicate at three concentrations [1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 μg/ml]) ranged from 2.68 to 3.40%; the accuracy (percent recovery) ranged from 97.5 to 101%.
RESULTS
Susceptibility and mutation frequency.
The agar dilution and broth microdilution modal MICs for the MRSA USA300 strain were both 0.75 μg/ml; the MBC was 1 μg/ml. The log10 mutation frequency ranged from −5.8 to −6.9 for agar plates with 3× the baseline MIC and from −7.1 to −7.7 for 5× MIC based on mutation frequencies determined on three different days. The less-susceptible subpopulations that grew in the presence of 3× MIC exhibited a higher MIC (2 to 3 μg/ml).
Time-kill studies.
The rate of bacterial killing was 1.5 to 2 log10 killing at 6 h for all tested vancomycin concentrations. Between 6 and 24 h, extensive regrowth was observed for the 0.75-μg/ml concentration. Bactericidal activity (i.e., ≥3-log kill) was observed for all concentrations within the range of 2.25 to 50 μg/ml, and the overall extent of killing and lack of regrowth up to 48 h were comparable for these concentrations (Fig. 1).
Fig 1.
Activity of vancomycin tested at concentrations ranging from 0.75 to 50 μg/ml in a static time-kill assay against the MRSA USA300 strain at an inoculum of 105.8 CFU/ml.
Hollow-fiber infection model.
The observed vancomycin concentration-time profiles for the three vancomycin dosage regimens are provided in Fig. 2. The free-drug AUCs (determined by the linear trapezoidal rule) were well comparable between regimens, with 262.2 ± 29.5 μg · h/ml for q24h dosing, 242.1 ± 31 μg · h/ml for q12h dosing, and 244.2 ± 1.3 μg · h/ml for continuous infusion.
Fig 2.
Observed vancomycin concentration-time profiles for regimens of 2 g every 24 h (A), 1 g every 12 h (B), and a 2-g continuous infusion (C) in the HFIM.
All three vancomycin dosing regimens with a total AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 had comparable bactericidal activities against MRSA. As shown in Fig. 3, vancomycin experienced a low rate of kill within the first 6 h (−0.91 to −1.24 log10 CFU/ml) and attained bactericidal activity (−3.27 to −3.57 log10 CFU/ml) at 24 h, which was maintained up to 168 h. Although bactericidal activity was achieved with all of the vancomycin dosing regimens in the HFIM, it is important to note that sterility was not attained. Of the colonies that did exist near or above the limit of detection for any of the dosing regimens, MICs of 0.75 to 1 μg/ml did not change from the baseline. Based on the results from the drug-containing agar with vancomycin at 3× MIC, all dosing regimens prevented the breakthrough of nonsusceptible subpopulations for each of the experimental treatment arms during the 7-day HFIM experimental period. No resistant colonies were found on plates with 3× MIC for the drug treatment arms, whereas the growth control showed a number of colonies, in agreement with the mutation frequency on plates with 3× MIC.
Fig 3.
An in vitro HFIM was used to compare three different vancomycin regimens (and a growth control): 2 g every 24 h, 1 g every 12 h, and a 2-g continuous infusion. Shown are the averages ± standard deviations of the log10 CFU/ml from 0 to 168 h based on two replicates for all cohorts except for the 2-g continuous infusion, for which one replicate was available.
DISCUSSION
After half a century of clinical use, the optimal mode of administration has not yet been elucidated for vancomycin. Although vancomycin is classified as an AUC/MIC ratio-driven antimicrobial, the data that support this were derived from multiple-daily-dosing regimens (4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 20, 21). To our knowledge, this is the first contemporary dose fractionation study designed to evaluate whether killing by vancomycin is driven by the AUC/MIC ratio. Overall, when dosed to simulate a total AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 in the HFIM, we were able to demonstrate comparable bacterial efficacies between once-daily vancomycin administration, continuous infusion, and twice-daily administration. Within each of the dosing regimens, vancomycin exhibited bactericidal activity after 24 h and maintained this activity for seven consecutive days. In addition to the sustained bactericidal effects, all three regimens suppressed the development of nonsusceptible subpopulations and were able to maintain MIC values of ≤1 μg/ml throughout the 7 days.
The exploration of dosing strategies to enhance the utility of an antibiotic agent is not a new approach (23, 25). This approach was utilized previously with daptomycin and was pivotal in the discovery that skeletal muscle toxicity issues were associated with more frequent dosing rather than a maximum concentration (15). Similar findings were exhibited with aminoglycosides, where it was determined that more frequent dosing intervals led to higher incidences of nephrotoxicity (19). To date, we are aware of only one clinical study and one in vitro study that compared vancomycin once-daily and twice-daily dosing regimens. In the clinical study, which focused on efficacy and safety, the outcomes were comparable between once-daily and twice-daily groups; however, it should be noted that the patients studied were not severely ill (3). In the in vitro study, Houlihan et al. utilized a simulated endocarditis vegetation model at a high initial inoculum (109 CFU/ml) in order to investigate the use of the 2-g-per-day regimen, administered once daily, twice daily, or as a continuous infusion, for a total of 72 h (8). Similar to our study, those authors observed that trough levels did not dictate bacterial efficacy despite a bacterial inoculum as high as 109 CFU/ml when the total AUC/MIC ratios associated with the dosing regimens were all >400.
Our results carry important implications for clinical practice. First, they challenge the need to obtain frequent trough concentrations: bactericidal efficacy was observed despite a trough concentration that was well below the lowest recommended total trough concentration of 10 μg/ml for the total daily vancomycin dose of 2 g given as a once-daily dosing regimen. Second, these results call into question the need for trough concentrations of 15 to 20 μg/ml for all patients. Our results are similar to those of another study by our group (16), which found that regimens producing trough values of ≥15 μg/ml were not always necessary to provide a total AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400, especially if the vancomycin MIC of the MRSA isolate is ≤1 μg/ml.
A second clinical implication of our data is the convenience associated with the once-daily administration of vancomycin. Multiple daily dosing of a drug is inconvenient due to the increased nursing time and the increased risk of medication errors associated with the frequency of administration and the time intervals between doses (14). The administration of vancomycin as a once-daily drug would alleviate these inconveniences, in addition to facilitating the transition to an outpatient treatment protocol.
Finally, by minimizing the trough concentration needed to achieve the desired AUC/MIC ratio, one may be able to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin. Since the daily AUC value is independent of the dosing frequency (16), and nephrotoxicity appears to be linked to the trough concentration (10), it may be advantageous to move from multiple daily dosing to once-daily vancomycin dosing in clinical practice. This approach needs explicit testing in randomized trials.
Overall, with a moderate inoculum, we demonstrated with an HFIM that vancomycin given as a once-daily dosing regimen exhibited bactericidal activity similar to that conferred by continuous-infusion and twice-daily dosing regimens against MRSA USA300 (MIC of 0.75 μg/ml) while maintaining the same AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400. Vancomycin was able to maintain efficacy and suppress the development of nonsusceptible subpopulations during a clinically relevant treatment duration of 7 days. Therefore, these results question the need for aggressive vancomycin trough concentrations of 15 to 20 μg/ml for all infections and suggest that the efficacy of vancomycin is not predicated on the trough concentration but rather the AUC when the MIC for the pathogen is <1 μg/ml. Finally, before these findings can be implemented in practice, clinical studies must reaffirm and strengthen the translation of the in vitro HFIM results to humans.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Brian Van Scoy and David Brown for their technical assistance and Allison Krug for her editorial support.
A.M.N., R.E.D., R.K., and A.L. have no conflicts of interest. J.B.B. has received grant support from Pfizer and Trius Therapeutics. T.P.L. is a consultant and speaker for Pfizer, Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, and Forest. T.P.L. has received grant support from Astellas, Cubist, and Pfizer. G.L.D. is a consultant for Forest, Cerexa Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca. G.L.D. has received grant support from Forest. This study was nonfunded.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 14 November 2011
REFERENCES
- 1. Butterfield JM, et al. 2011. Refining vancomycin protein binding estimates: identification of clinical factors that influence protein binding. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:4277–4282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2009. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; CLSI documents, 8th ed. M07-A8 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cohen E, et al. 2002. Once-daily versus twice-daily intravenous administration of vancomycin for infections in hospitalized patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:155–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Craig WA. 1998. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Craig WA. 2003. Basic pharmacodynamics of antibacterials with clinical applications to the use of beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 17:479–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Drusano GL, et al. 2007. Vancomycin dose recommendations for hospital-, ventilator- or health care-associated pneumonia and the attainment of vancomycin trough concentrations of 15–20 mg/L: cognitive dissonance, abstr 447. Abstr. 45th Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., San Diego, CA Infectious Diseases Society of America, Arlington, VA [Google Scholar]
- 7. Harigaya Y, et al. 2009. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin at simulated epithelial lining fluid concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): implications for dosing in MRSA pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3894–3901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Houlihan HH, Mercier RC, Rybak MJ. 1997. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin alone and in combination with gentamicin at various dosing intervals against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots in an in vitro infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2497–2501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. LaPlante KL, Leonard SN, Andes DR, Craig WA, Rybak MJ. 2008. Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro pharmacodynamic models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2156–2162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lodise TP, Patel N, Lomaestro BM, Rodvold KA, Drusano GL. 2009. Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration-time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:507–514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Louie A, et al. 2007. In vitro infection model characterizing the effect of efflux pump inhibition on prevention of resistance to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3988–4000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lubenko IY, et al. 2008. Telavancin and vancomycin pharmacodynamics with Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62:1065–1069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. 2004. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 43:925–942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nettleman MD, Bock MJ. 1996. The epidemiology of missed medication doses in hospitalized patients. Clin. Perform. Qual. Health Care 4:148–153 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Oleson FB, Jr, et al. 2000. Once-daily dosing in dogs optimizes daptomycin safety. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2948–2953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Patel N, et al. 2011. Vancomycin: we can't get there from here. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52:969–974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rodvold KA, et al. 1988. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:848–852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rodvold KA, Pryka RD, Garrison M, Rotschafer JC. 1989. Evaluation of a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting program for predicting vancomycin concentrations. Ther. Drug Monit. 11:269–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rybak MJ, et al. 1999. Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1549–1555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rybak MJ. 2006. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42(Suppl. 1):S35–S39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rybak MJ. 2006. Pharmacodynamics: relation to antimicrobial resistance. Am. J. Med. 119(6 Suppl. 1):S37–S44; discussion S62–S70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rybak MJ, et al. 2009. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 66:82–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tally FP, et al. 1999. Daptomycin: a novel agent for Gram-positive infections. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 8:1223–1238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tam VH, Louie A, Deziel MR, Liu W, Drusano GL. 2005. Bacterial-population responses to drug-selective pressure: examination of garenoxacin's effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Infect. Dis. 192:420–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. ter Braak EW, et al. 1990. Once-daily dosing regimen for aminoglycoside plus β-lactam combination therapy of serious bacterial infections: comparative trial of netilmicin plus ceftriaxone. Am. J. Med. 89:58–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Torrico M, et al. 2011. Activity of simulated serum concentrations of daptomycin versus vancomycin during the first 24h of treatment in the presence of physiological albumin concentrations against vancomycin-susceptible, -tolerant or -intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 37:332–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



