Abstract
Introduction
Cigarette smoking has a negative effect on body reserve of antioxidants and cholesterol metabolism. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a potent antioxidant synthesized as part of the cholesterol pathway, is a potential biomarker for systemic oxidative stress. We aimed to investigate gender variation in plasma lipid profile and CoQ10 concentrations in healthy non-smokers and in smokers.
Material and methods
The study included 55 cigarette smokers (25 females and 30 males) and 51 non-smokers (25 females and 26 males) with the age range from 21 to 45 years, and who had no history of alcohol abuse or chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus or obesity. Coenzyme Q10 plasma concentrations were measured by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection. Fasting plasma glucose and lipid levels were determined by standard colorimetric methods.
Results
Our results showed that CoQ10 concentrations were significantly decreased in smokers, especially in females, than their non-smoker counterparts. Female smokers also exhibited a significant decrease in plasma concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, and atherogenic ratios HDL-C/TC and CoQ10/LDL-C than male counterparts. Plasma triglyceride concentrations were increased in smokers irrespective of gender. Plasma CoQ10 was relatively more associated with TC and LDL-C in female smokers than male smokers.
Conclusions
The adverse effects of smoking on body reserve of antioxidants and cholesterol metabolism are greater in females than in males, partially as a result of decreased CoQ10 plasma concentrations, HDL-C and total-cholesterol and abnormal atherogenicity indices.
Keywords: coenzyme Q10, cigarette smoking, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein, triglycerides
Introduction
The majority of respiratory system cancers and pulmonary vascular diseases are attributable to cigarette smoking [1, 2]. Smoking is also linked to cardiovascular diseases [3], stroke [4] and fertility disorders [5]. Moreover, an increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases and cancer has been associated with cigarette smoking and exposure to cigarette smoke [6–8). Prior studies examining the relationship between all-cause mortality and cigarette smoking have identified gender differences [9]; and alteration of cholesterol metabolism [10, 11] as significant contributing factors to the increased risk of death among active smokers.
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a lipid-soluble compound synthesized as part of the cholesterol pathway, is an essential cofactor in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, a potent antioxidant, and a potential biomarker for systemic oxidative stress [12–14]. Deficiencies in plasma CoQ10 have been reported in many patient groups, including certain cardiovascular [15], neurological [16], hematological [17], neoplastic [18], renal [19], and metabolic diseases [20]. Moreover, plasma CoQ10 concentration is an independent predictor of mortality in chronic heart failure [21].
Previous studies have reported controversial effects of smoking on CoQ10. Smoking has been shown to be positively associated with plasma CoQ10 [22, 23], whereas other studies reported no association [24, 25] or a negative association with plasma CoQ10 levels [26]. Numerous factors have been suggested to contribute to this controversy, including gender, the levels of plasma cholesterol and triglycerides [25]. Therefore, we aimed to determine changes in CoQ10 concentration induced by cigarette smoking in healthy subjects and to investigate the possible association of plasma CoQ10 with gender and lipid profile.
Material and methods
Reagents
Methanol, ethanol and n-propanol were HPLC grades obtained from BDH (BDH Chemicals, Poole, Dorset, UK). Pure Coenzyme Q10 and benzoquinone were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as standard. Reagent kits for the analysis of blood glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides were purchased from Biosystems (S.A., Costa Brava, Barcelona, Spain).
Subjects
A total of 106 healthy volunteers (56 males, and 50 females), with an age range of 21-45 years and having no history of alcohol abuse or diseases such as diabetes mellitus or obesity, volunteered to participate in the research after their consent was obtained. Volunteers were excluded from the study if they were on antioxidant or lipid-lowering medication. The research has been carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association; and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the university. Subjects were grouped according to their cigarette smoking status into non-smokers (n = 51) and smokers (n = 55) groups. Smoking status was assigned according to the following criteria: (1) at least 21 years old, (2) daily smokers, (3) at least a 5-year smoking history, (4) smoke at least 15 cigarettes per day. Anthropometric measurements such as height and weight were made following standard techniques.
Biochemical tests
Blood samples were drawn at about 9.00 am after an overnight fast into heparinized Vacutainers (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Following centrifugation for 10 min at 4°C, plasma fraction was removed and stored at −80°C till analysis.
Fasting plasma glucose levels, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, total protein and albumin were determined in all the subjects. Assays were performed with a Dade Behring Dimension RxL clinical chemistry system (Dade Behring; Germany) using its own kits. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using the Friedewald's formula [27]. The atherogenic ratio of TC/HDL-C as well as the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), calculated as log (TG/HDL-C), with TG and HDL-C, were measured in molar concentrations [28].
Total plasma coenzyme Q10 was measured by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection using the method of Mosca et al. [29] with a slight modification. The method is based on oxidation of CoQ10 in the sample by treating it with para-benzoquinone. Coenzyme Q10 was then quantitatively extracted into 1-propanol with a fast one-step extraction procedure, after centrifugation, samples were injected directly into the HPLC apparatus [30]. Pre-oxidation of the sample ensures quantification of total CoQ10 by ultraviolet (UV) detection. The separation was performed using reversed-phase Supelcosil LC18 column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The mobile phase was represented by ethanol-methanol (65-35%). The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min and UV detection was carried out at 275 nm. This method achieves a linear detector response for peak area measurements over the concentration range of 0.05-3.47 µM with a CV of 1.6% for samples approaching normal values (1.02 µM). Supplementation of the samples with known amounts of CoQ10 yielded a quantitative recovery of 97.5-99%.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch's correction. Correlation analysis was done using linear regression and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was defined by p < 0.05. All statistical tests were two-tailed. Calculations were done using SPSS for Windows (release 13.0, 2004; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
A total of 106 subjects (50 females and 56 males) met eligibility criteria and were grouped according to cigarette smoking habit into a non-smoking group (n = 51) and a currently smoking group (n = 55). No significant differences in age, sex or body mass index (BMI) were observed between studied groups (Table I).
Table I.
Age and body mass index (BMI) of female and male individuals for all groups
| Parameter | Gender | Non-smokers (n = 51) | Smokers (n = 55) | Value of pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Female (n = 50) | 25 (49%) | 25 (45%) | 0.845c |
| Male (n = 56) | 26 (51%) | 30 (55%) | ||
| Age [years]a | Female (n = 50) | 36.3 ± 12.1 | 34.6 ± 7.5 | 0.553 |
| Male (n = 56) | 34.3 ± 12.7 | 35.1 ± 12.7 | 0.815 | |
| Value of p | 0.565 | 0.201c | ||
| BMI [kg/m2]a | Female (n = 50) | 24.2 ± 3.0 | 25.5 ± 3.3 | 0.153 |
| Male (n=56) | 25.9± 2.0 | 27.0 ± 4.8 | 0.258 | |
| Value of p | 0.863 | 0.177c |
aResults are presented as mean ± SD,
bp values are calculated by unpaired t-test with Welch's correction,
cp value is calculated by Fisher's exact test (2-sided)
Table II summarizes the main differences in the measured parameters between studied groups. There were no significant differences in plasma CoQ10 concentrations between male and female in the non-smoking group. In contrast, female smokers showed significantly (p < 0.003) lower plasma CoQ10 levels than male smokers. In addition, plasma CoQ10 concentrations were significantly lower in male (p < 0.006) and female (p < 0.0001) smokers compared with their non-smoking counterparts. No significant differences were found between the studied groups regarding fasting blood glucose levels.
Table II.
Plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and biochemical parameters in studied groups
| Parametera | Gender | Non-smokers (n = 51) | Smokers (n = 55) | Value of pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoQ10 [µmol/l]) | Female (n = 50) | 1.32 ± 0.30 | 0.44 ± 0.20 | 0.0001 |
| Male (n = 56) | 1.50 ± 0.45 | 0.76 ± 0.35 | 0.006 | |
| Value of p | 0.053 | 0.003 | ||
| Glucose [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 5.60 ± 0.60 | 6.20 ± 1.90 | 0.141 |
| Male (n = 56) | 5.40 ± 0.40 | 5.90 ± 1.70 | 0.128 | |
| Value of p | 0.178 | 0.548 | ||
| Cholesterol [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 5.10 ± 0.90 | 4.10 ± 0.90 | 0.005 |
| Male (n = 56) | 4.90 ± 0.80 | 4.70 ± 1.13 | 0.44 | |
| Value of p | 0.40 | 0.034 | ||
| HDL-C [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 1.39 ± 0.31 | 0.90 ± 0.12 | 0.0001 |
| Male (n = 56) | 1.29 ± 0.29 | 1.03 ± 0.26 | 0.02 | |
| Value of p | 0.07 | 0.001 | ||
| LDL-C [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 2.95 ± 0.33 | 2.02 ± 0.46 | 0.001 |
| Male (n = 56) | 3.03 ± 0.41 | 3.11 ± 0.61 | 0.563 | |
| Value of p | 0.48 | 0.001 | ||
| Triglycerides [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 1.69 ± 0.54 | 2.02 ± 0.44 | 0.003 |
| Male (n = 56) | 1.78 ± 0.42 | 2.26 ± 0.51 | 0.001 | |
| Value of p | 0.164 | 0.105 | ||
| AIP | Female (n = 50) | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.001 |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.001 | |
| Value of p | 0.07 | 0.961 | ||
| TC/HDL-C | Female (n = 50) | 3.67 ± 1.10 | 4.56 ± 1.53 | 0.026 |
| Male (n = 56) | 3.89 ± 1.09 | 4.56 ± 1.44 | 0.056 | |
| Value of p | 0.523 | 0.967 | ||
| CoQ10/LDL-C [µmol/mmol] | Female (n = 50) | 0.44 ± 0.14 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.001 |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.46 ± 0.16 | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 0.001 | |
| Value of p | 0.45 | 0.001 |
AIP – The atherogenic index of plasma, defined as log(TG/HDL-C),
aresults are presented as mean ± SD,
bp values are calculated by unpaired t test with Welch's correction
Regarding plasma cholesterol; female smokers showed significantly decreased plasma concentrations of total cholesterol compared with female non-smokers (p < 0.005) and male smokers (p < 0.03). Regarding HDL-C, male smokers showed significantly (p < 0.02) lower HDL-C than non-smoker males, whereas no significant differences were found in HDL-C concentrations between male and female non-smokers. Female smokers showed the lowest concentrations of plasma HDL-C (0.9 ± 0.12 mmol/l), which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than non-smoker females. No gender differences were found in LDL-C concentrations between non-smoker groups, however in smoker groups, females showed significantly lower LDL-C than males (p < 0.001). Female smokers showed also significantly decreased LDL-C than non-smoker females (p < 0.001). Men showed higher triglycerides than women both in the non-smoking group and in the smoker group, but this trend did not reach statistical significance, whereas smokers in both in male and female groups showed significantly increased triglycerides compared with their non-smoker counterparts (p < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively).
Table II also shows the average values of the atherogenic indices AIP, TC/HDL-C, and CoQ10/LDL-C. All indices showed significant differences between smokers and non-smokers irrespective of sex, but CoQ10/LDL-C was the only index differing significantly between female and male smokers (p < 0.001).
Spearman's correlation analyses of data are presented in Table III. Plasma CoQ10 concentrations were significantly correlated with TC and LDL-C only in female smokers. No correlations were observed between CoQ10 and age, BMI, glucose, HDL-C, or triglycerides.
Table III.
The correlation between plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and biochemical parameters in studied groups
| Parametera | Group | Non-smokers (n = 51) | Smokers (n = 55) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | Female (n = 50) | 0.196 | 0.399 | |
| Male (n = 56) | −0.22 | 0.106 | ||
| BMI [kg/m2] | Female (n = 50) | 0.400 | 0.477 | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.321 | 0.326 | ||
| Glucose [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 0.107 | 0.342 | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.024 | 0.333 | ||
| Cholesterol [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 0.258 | 0.630*** | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.397* | 0.301 | ||
| HDL-C [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | −0.266 | 0.093 | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.090 | 0.209 | ||
| LDL-C [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 0.199 | 0.577** | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.426* | 0.031 | ||
| Triglycerides [mmol/l] | Female (n = 50) | 0.477** | −0.182 | |
| Male (n = 56) | −0.030 | 0.297 | ||
| AIP | Female (n = 50) | 0.238 | 0.334 | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.182 | 0.271 | ||
| TC/HDL-C | Female (n = 50) | 0.158 | 0.397 | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.224 | 0.309 | ||
| CoQ10/LDL-C [µmol/mmol] | Female (n = 50) | 0.274 | 0.596*** | |
| Male (n = 56) | 0.146 | 0.466** |
aResults are presented as a correlation coefficient,
*significant at p < 0.05,
**significant at p < 0.01,
***significant at p < 0.001
Discussion
Cigarette smoking has a negative impact on oxidant defense systems not only through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in smoke but also through the consumption of the body reserve of antioxidants [31–33]. In addition to these data, our results show that smoking has a negative impact on the plasma levels of the antioxidant CoQ10. These results support the assumption that smoking induced-oxidative stress may be the result of, and/or the cause of, decreased plasma CoQ10 [33].
The impact of smoking on plasma CoQ10 was significantly more marked in female than male smokers (p < 0.003). The same trend has been reported in previous studies which demonstrated that CoQ10 is affected by gender [25, 34]. This finding may provide an additional factor for the higher vulnerability to the detrimental effects of cigarette smoking in female compared with male smokers. Previous studies have emphasized that females may respond differently to tobacco-specific carcinogens based on several factors, including that females having higher DNA adduct levels, an increased CYP1A1 expression, a decreased DNA repair capacity and an increased incidence of K-ras gene mutations [35–38].
Additional factors have been suggested to contribute to interindividual susceptibility to smoking-related morbidity and mortality including BMI [39], age [40], and total cholesterol [41]. Therefore, we studied these parameters in relation to plasma CoQ10 concentrations of healthy smokers and non-smokers. In agreement with Wolters and Hahn study [42], no significant correlation was found between CoQ10 levels and BMI or age. However, results of the present study show that smoking is associated with abnormal lipid profile, and that these abnormalities were more significantly evident in female than male smokers. Female smokers exhibited significantly lower TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C values than both female non-smokers (p < 0.005; p < 0.024; p < 0.0001 respectively), and male smokers (p < 0.03; p < 0.042; p < 0.028 respectively). These findings are in agreement with a previous study in women aged less than 50 years [43]. These findings are in agreement with the Munster Heart Study (PROCAM) [44] and the Framingham Study [45] which reported decreased TC and LDL-C concentrations in smokers but not in non-smokers. These studies have also found evidence that total mortality in middle-aged men is increased at low TC and LDL-C concentrations in smokers but not in non-smokers [44, 45].
The relationship between serum TC level and mortality rate was found U-shaped as a result of a U-shaped association with mortality from infectious diseases, a negative association with mortality from cancer and alcohol-related diseases, and a positive association with mortality from cardiovascular diseases and diabetes/nephropathy. Accumulated evidence suggests that a low cholesterol level may be a metabolic consequence of cancer rather than a precursor [46]. Moreover, increasing evidence now suggests that low cholesterol levels are associated with not only cancer, but also adverse effects on the brain causing neuropsychiatric syndromes [47] and haemorrhagic stroke [48]. In the present study, results showed a significant positive correlation between CoQ10 plasma concentrations and TC and LDL-C (both at p < 0.001) only in female smokers. This relationship suggests that those subjects with lower TC and LDL-C, as in the situation of female smokers, are more likely to have lower CoQ10, and therefore could be more prone to cancer, infectious and brain diseases later in their life.
Moreover, these data are in agreement with earlier studies demonstrating a close connection between CoQ10 and plasma lipids, as about 60% of plasma CoQ10 is associated with LDL-C, and that CoQ10 is mainly associated with plasma lipids rather than with cellular components [49, 50].
Numerous studies have indicated that LDL-C is associated with atherosclerosis plaque initiation and vulnerability to rupture, while cigarette smoking is more associated with plaque progression [51]. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) that has been suggested as a marker of plasma atherogenicity [28], was found in the present study to be significantly higher in male and female smokers (p < 0.001). We further tested whether this trend is valid for other proposed atherogenic indices TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C [52, 53]. Both indices were found significantly higher in smokers than non-smokers irrespective of sex.
Studies have proposed the ratio CoQ10/LDL-C as a sensitive marker for development of atherosclerotic changes and coronary artery disease [50, 54, 55]. In our study, this ratio was significantly lower in smokers compared with non-smokers; however it was significantly lower in female smokers compared with male smokers suggesting that female smokers may be at increased risk of developing atherosclerosis. In addition, this finding may provide an additional clarification for previous findings of a much stronger association between smoking and coronary heart disease in women than men [51], which was attributable to arteriolar differences [51, 56].
In conclusion, this study suggests that the adverse effects of smoking are greater in females than in males, partially as a result of decreased CoQ10 plasma concentrations, HDL-C and total-cholesterol and abnormal atherogencity indices. There is clearly a need for further large-scale studies to be designed in such a way that they are sensitive to a range of factors that contribute to gender difference in susceptibility to smoking.
References
- 1.Clark TG, Murphy MF, Hey K, Drury M, Cheng KK, Aveyard P. Does smoking influence survival in cancer patients through effects on respiratory and vascular disease? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:87–90. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000186634.81753.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rendu F, Peoc'h K, Berlin I, Thomas D, Launay JM. Smoking related diseases: the central role of monoamine oxidase. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:136–47. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Pazhenkottil AP, et al. Influence of smoking on the prognostic value of cardiovascular computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:365–70. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shah RS, Cole JW. Smoking and stroke: the more you smoke the more you stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:917–32. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elshal MF, El-Sayed IH, Elsaied MA, El-Masry SA, Kumosani TA. Sperm head defects and disturbances in spermatozoal chromatin and DNA integrities in idiopathic infertile subjects: association with cigarette smoking. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:589–94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martiniuk A, Lee CM, Woodward M, Huxley R. Burden of lung cancer deaths due to smoking for men and women in the WHO Western Pacific and South East Asian regions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:67–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Honjo K, Iso H, Tsugane S, et al. The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese: pooled analysis of three large-scale cohort studies in Japan. Tob Control. 2010;19:50–7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.029751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention. State-specific smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost- United States, 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bobak M. Relative and absolute gender gap in all-cause mortality in Europe and the contribution of smoking. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:15–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1022556718939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakamura K, Barzi F, Huxley R, et al. Does cigarette smoking exacerbate the effect of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the risk of cardiovascular diseases? Heart. 2009;95:909–16. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.147066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blanco-Cedres L, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, et al. Relation of cigarette smoking to 25-year mortality in middle-aged men with low baseline serum cholesterol: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:354–60. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.4.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Disch A, Hemmerlin A, Bach TJ, Rohmer M. Mevalonate-derived isopentenyl diphosphate is the biosynthetic precursor of ubiquinone prenyl side chain in tobacco BY-2 cells. Biochem J. 1998;331:615–21. doi: 10.1042/bj3310615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quinzii CM, Lopez LC, Gilkerson RW, et al. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, and cell death correlate with level of CoQ10 deficiency. FASEB J. 2010;24:3733–43. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-152728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kędziora-Kornatowska K, Czuczejko J, Motyl J, et al. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on activities of selected antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in hypertensive patients treated with indapamide. A pilot study. Arch Med Sci. 2010;6:513–8. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2010.14461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar A, Kaur H, Devi P, Mohan V. Role of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in cardiac disease, hypertension and Meniere-like syndrome. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;124:259–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Montero R, Pineda M, Aracil A, et al. Clinical, biochemical and molecular aspects of cerebellar ataxia and Coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Cerebellum. 2007;6:118–22. doi: 10.1080/14734220601021700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Majaj AS, Folkers K. Hematological activity of coenzyme Q in an anemia of human malnutrition. Int Z Vitaminforsch. 1968;38:182–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Somers-Edgar TJ, Rosengren RJ. Coenzyme Q0 induces apoptosis and modulates the cell cycle in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:33–40. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328314b5c5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Salviati L, Sacconi S, Murer L, et al. Infantile encephalomyopathy and nephropathy with CoQ10 deficiency: a CoQ10-responsive condition. Neurology. 2005;65:606–8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172859.55579.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mancini A, Leone E, Festa R, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant systems (coenzyme Q10 and total antioxidant capacity) in morbid obesity before and after biliopancreatic diversion. Metabolism. 2008;57:1384–9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Molyneux SL, Florkowski CM, George PM, et al. Coenzyme Q10: an independent predictor of mortality in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1435–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaikkonen J, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Ristonmaa U, Salonen JT. Determinants of plasma coenzyme Q10 in humans. FEBS Lett. 1999;443:163–6. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01712-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zita C, Overvad K, Mortensen SA, Sindberg CD, Moesgaard S, Hunter DA. Serum coenzyme Q10 concentrations in healthy men supplemented with 30 mg or 100 mg coenzyme Q10 for two months in a randomised controlled study. Biofactors. 2003;18:185–93. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520180221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lagendijk J, Ubbink JB, Vermaak WJ. Measurement of the ratio between the reduced and oxidized forms of coenzyme Q10 in human plasma as a possible marker of oxidative stress. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:67–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miles MV, Horn PS, Morrison JA, Tang PH, DeGrauw T, Pesce AJ. Plasma coenzyme Q10 reference intervals, but not redox status, are affected by gender and race in self-reported healthy adults. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;332:123–32. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00137-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kontush A, Reich A, Baum K, et al. Plasma ubiquinol-10 is decreased in patients with hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1997;129:119–26. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(96)06021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dobiasova M, Frohlich J. The plasma parameter log (TG/HDL-C) as an atherogenic index: correlation with lipoprotein particle size and esterification rate in apoB-lipoprotein-depleted plasma (FER(HDL)) Clin Biochem. 2001;34:583–8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(01)00263-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mosca F, Fattorini D, Bompadre S, Littarru GP. Assay of coenzyme Q(10) in plasma by a single dilution step. Anal Biochem. 2002;305:49–54. doi: 10.1006/abio.2002.5653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Edlund PO. Determination of coenzyme Q10, alpha-tocopherol and cholesterol in biological samples by coupled-column liquid chromatography with coulometric and ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr. 1988;425:87–97. doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(88)80009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Isik B, Ceylan A, Isik R. Oxidative stress in smokers and non-smokers. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:767–9. doi: 10.1080/08958370701401418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsuchiya M, Asada A, Kasahara E, Sato EF, Shindo M, Inoue M. Smoking a single cigarette rapidly reduces combined concentrations of nitrate and nitrite and concentrations of antioxidants in plasma. Circulation. 2002;105:1155–7. doi: 10.1161/hc1002.105935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dietrich M, Block G, Norkus EP, et al. Smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke decrease some plasma antioxidants and increase gamma-tocopherol in vivo after adjustment for dietary antioxidant intakes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:160–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.1.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Molyneux SL, Florkowski CM, Lever M, George PM. Biological variation of coenzyme Q10. Clin Chem. 2005;51:455–7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.043653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moore R, Doherty D, Chamberlain R, Khuri F. Sex differences in survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients 1974-1998. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:57–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kiyohara C, Ohno Y. Sex differences in lung cancer susceptibility: a review. Gend Med. 2010;7:381–401. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Harris RE, Zang EA, Anderson JI, Wynder EL. Race and sex differences in lung cancer risk associated with cigarette smoking. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:592–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.4.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zang EA, Wynder EL. Differences in lung cancer risk between men and women: examination of the evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:183–92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Koh WP, Yuan JM, Wang R, Lee HP, Yu MC. Body mass index and smoking-related lung cancer risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:610–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiang J, Liu B, Nasca PC, et al. Age-related effects of smoking on lung cancer mortality: a nationwide case-control comparison in 103 population centers in China. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:484–91. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Houterman S, Verschuren WM, Kromhout D. Smoking, blood pressure and serum cholesterol-effects on 20-year mortality. Epidemiology. 2003;14:24–9. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200301000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wolters M, Hahn A. Plasma ubiquinone status and response to six-month supplementation combined with multivitamins in healthy elderly women: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2003;73:207–14. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.73.3.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vincelj J, Sucic M, Bergovec M, et al. Serum total, LDL, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides related to age, gender and cigarette smoking in patients with first acute myocardial infarction. Coll Antropol. 1997;21:517–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cullen P, Schulte H, Assmann G. The Munster Heart Study (PROCAM): total mortality in middle-aged men is increased at low total and LDL cholesterol concentrations in smokers but not in nonsmokers. Circulation. 1997;96:2128–36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Higgins M. Role of smoking in the U-shaped relation of cholesterol to mortality in men. The Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:822–7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fagot-Campagna A, Hanson RL, Narayan KM, et al. Serum cholesterol and mortality rates in a Native American population with low cholesterol concentrations: a U-shaped association. Circulation. 1997;96:1408–15. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martinez-Carpio PA, Barba J, Bedoya-Del Campillo A. Relation between cholesterol levels and neuropsychiatric disorders. Rev Neurol. 2009;48:261–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:549–59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alleva R, Tomasetti M, Bompadre S, Littarru GP. Oxidation of LDL and their subfractions: kinetic aspects and CoQ10 content. Mol Aspects Med. 1997;(18 Suppl):105–12. doi: 10.1016/s0098-2997(97)00039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tomasetti M, Alleva R, Solenghi MD, Littarru GP. Distribution of antioxidants among blood components and lipoproteins: significance of lipids/CoQ10 ratio as a possible marker of increased risk for atherosclerosis. Biofactors. 1999;9:231–40. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520090218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sharrett AR, Ding J, Criqui MH, et al. Smoking, diabetes, and blood cholesterol differ in their associations with subclinical atherosclerosis: the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2006;186:441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Arsenault BJ, Rana JS, Stroes ES, et al. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: respective contributions of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, and the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to coronary heart disease risk in apparently healthy men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;55:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hadaegh F, Khalili D, Ghasemi A, Tohidi M, Sheikholeslami F, Azizi F. Triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio is an independent predictor for coronary heart disease in a population of Iranian men. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19:401–8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hanaki Y, Sugiyama S, Ozawa T, Ohno M. Ratio of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to ubiquinone as a coronary risk factor. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:814–5. doi: 10.1056/nejm199109123251116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yalcin A, Kilinc E, Sagcan A, Kultursay H. Coenzyme Q10 concentrations in coronary artery disease. Clin Biochem. 2004;37:706–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Aboyans V, Criqui MH, McClelland RL, et al. Intrinsic contribution of gender and ethnicity to normal ankle-brachial index values: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
