Abstract
Interest in the identities, properties, functions and origins of local antigen presenting cells (APC) in CNS tissues is growing. We recently reported that dendritic cells (DC) distinct from microglia were present in quiescent retina, and rapidly responded to injured neurons. In this study, the disease-promoting and regulatory contributions of these APC in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) were examined. Local delivery of purified, exogenous DC or monocytes from bone marrow substantially increased the incidence and severity of EAU induced by adoptive transfer of activated, autoreactive CD4 or CD8 T cells that was limited to the manipulated eye. In vitro assays of antigen presenting cell activity of DC from quiescent retina showed that they promoted generation of Foxp3+ T cells, and inhibited activation of naive T cells by splenic DC and antigen. Conversely, in vitro assays of DC purified from injured retina revealed an enhanced ability to activate T cells, and reduced induction of Foxp3+ T cells. These findings were supported by the observation that in situ activation of DC prior to adoptive transfer of β-galactosidase-specific T cells dramatically increased severity and incidence of EAU. Recruitment of T cells into retina by local delivery of antigen in vivo showed that quiescent retina promoted development of parenchymal Foxp3+ T cells, but assays of pre-injured retina did not. Together, these results demonstrated that local conditions in the retina determined APC function, and affected the pathogenesis of EAU by both CD4 and CD8 T cells.
Introduction
A central event in adaptive immunity is T cell activation by presentation of cognate Ag. The APC that perform this function, whether for activation of naive T cells in lymphoid tissues, or for presentation of Ag to effector T cells in peripheral tissues, are increasingly found to be dendritic cells (DC)4 (1, 2). Several animal models are used to study immune responses in nervous system tissues. Most are based on autoreactive CD4 or CD8 T cells specific for neural antigens and include experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) (3–6), and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (7). The APC present in the initial stages of immune recognition in the CNS, especially retina, are not yet defined, but candidates have been identified (8–12).
The ability of the intraocular environment to modulate immune responses was an early, paradigm-setting example of tissue/organ specific effects on the immune system (13). An important mechanism of ocular immune privilege, i.e. immune deviation, was subsequently elucidated by Streilein et al (14). More recently, local tissue-dependent control of immune effector responses has been proposed to be widespread, allowing immune responses throughout the body to be adapted to the needs of the tissue (15).
Recently, we found that CD45+ cells isolated from quiescent retina, largely microglia (MG), had little ability to present antigen to naïve T cells in vitro as measured by T cell activation, proliferation and cytokine production (16). Presentation of Ag to Ag-experienced T cells was greater than to naïve T cells, but was still limited. The induction of EAU in the retina implies that there is local recognition of Ag and on-going T cell activation, but the nature, identity, and origin of the APC are uncertain. Previously we showed that recruited APC could support the induction of EAU (17). The finding that recruited APC could support the induction of autoimmune T cells suggests that resident retinal APC, including resident DC, are either less able to trigger a damaging T cell response, or that they possess a regulatory phenotype that reduces the potency of autoimmune T cell activity.
In this study we examine the ability of peripheral DC, resident MG or retinal DC to activate effector T cell populations and induce EAU, and to stimulate differentiation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) that can modulate EAU development. We demonstrated that peripheral DC injected into the retina increased the induction of EAU mediated by adoptive transfer of activated T cells, but that resident DC in quiescent retina suppressed the onset of EAU, likely via the induction of Treg that modulated the activity of T cells specific for retinal Ag. Recruitment of endogenous, activated DC into the retina by local injury promoted the pathogenesis of EAU.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Arrβgal mice on the B6 and B10.A backgrounds express β̃galactosidase (βgal) under control of the rod photoreceptor arrestin promoter resulting in βgal expression in retina (150–200 ng), pineal gland (<0.5 ng), and rare, unidentified brain cells (18–20). CD11c-DTR/GFP breeders were a gift from Dr. S. J. McSorley. These mice express GFP and the diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) using the CD11c promoter on the B6 background (12, 21). CD11c-DTR/GFP mice were also crossed to the B10.A background and F1 offspring used. Two strains producing βgal-specific TCR Tg T cells were used. βgalTCR mice (B10.A) produce CD4 T cells specific for βgal (20, 22). BG2 mice express a βgal-specific TCR on B6 CD4 T cells (23). Breeder pairs of Tg mice expressing GFP driven by the Foxp3 promoter (Foxp3-GFP mice (24)) were a gift from Dr. S. S. Way. Mice were handled in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and University of Minnesota IACUC guidelines.
ONC injury
A unilateral optic nerve crush (ONC) was performed as previously described (12, 25).
Intraocular injections
Anterior chamber (AC) inoculations were done by transcorneal deposition into the AC of the eye (12). A 33 gauge blunt cannula on a 10 µl Hamilton syringe was used to slowly pass 1.0 – 1.5 µl of saline, DTx (5 ng), Ag (5 µg), or cells into the AC.
Generation, activation, and transfer of polyclonal βgal-specific CD8 T Cells
The β4 CD8 T cell line specific for an H-2Ld-restricted epitope of βgal (TPHPARIGL) (26), was prepared from female B10.A mice following infection with recombinant, βgal-expressing vaccinia virus (4, 5). For adoptive transfer, recipient mice received 1 – 15 × 106 in vitro activated T cells, as indicated, purified by positive selection for CD90+ cells by magnetic sorting (MACS, Miltenyi Biotech). For AC injections, the T cells were delivered in 1 µl of saline.
Preparation of CD4 T cells for adoptive transfer
TCR Tg T cells from pooled spleen and LN were stimulated with Ag for 2 d using irradiated splenic APC from Rag−/− mice. T cells were purified by positive selection for CD90+ cells using MACS.
Preparation of splenic or bone marrow (BM) APC for AC injection
Fresh CD11c+ DC were prepared from BM by positive selection with CD11c MACS and an LS column. CD11b+ monocytes were enriched from a suspension of BM cells that were first depleted with mAb to CD19 and CD11c using MACS and LD columns. The flow-through cells were positively selected using anti-CD11b MACS and passage over LS columns. Candidate APC were not activated prior to AC injection.
Preparation of retinal APC
Retinal DC and MG from naïve CD11c-DTR/GFP mice, or from mice pretreated with a retinal injury to recruit and activate myeloid cells in retina. Mice were euthanized, perfused, and retinas removed as described (27). Retinas were dissociated using 0.5 mg/ml Liberase/Blendzyme3 (Roche) and 0.01% DNAse, washed with DPBS, incubated for 10 min at RT in 0.5 µg anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (Fc block), washed, and labeled with paramagnetic anti-CD45. After positive selection for CD45 on LS columns, the cells were stained for CD11b and sorted on a FACS Aria (BD Biosciences) for GFP+ cells (DC) and GFP− cells (MG).
In vitro antigen presentation assays
In vitro assays of APC activity were done in 96 well V-bottom plates. βgalTCR CD4 T cells were isolated using a CD4 enrichment MACS kit. Fresh CD11c+ DC were prepared from BM by positive selection with CD11c MACS and an LS column. BG2 CD4 T cells were prepared from BG2×Foxp3/GFP mice as described above, and flow sorted for CD4+25−GFP− cells to efficiently remove Tregs. For assays of retinal APC, DC and MG were prepared from CD11c-DTR/GFP mice as described above. The purified APC (0 – 250 cells/well, as indicated) and T cells (5 × 103/well) were combined with/without βgal Ag for 4–5 days, harvested and stained for CD25, CD44 and CD3. GFP expression (Foxp3 reporter) was detected by its autofluorescence. Activated T cells were defined as CD3+CD44hiCD25+. Tregs were defined as CD3+CD44hiCD25+GFP+.
Immunostaining of retinal whole mounts
Retinas were removed from euthanized mice (27), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 min., and blocked in 10% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno Research) with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at RT. Tissues were incubated for 3 h at 4°C in Alexa-594-conjugated isolectin B4 (Invitrogen) to stain vascular endothelial cells. GFP was visualized by its autofluorescence. Stained retinal flatmounts were examined using conventional epifluorescence microscopy (Leica DM4000B, Wetzlar, Germany).
Histopathology
The severity of autoimmune damage to the retina was scored using H & E stained sections from formalin-fixed eyes as described elsewhere (4, 20).
Results
CD4 T cell mediated EAU following transfer of APC into the AC of the eye
Induction of EAU is dependent on the dose of activated autoreactive T cells given by systemic adoptive transfer (3, 28). If antigen presentation in retina by local APC is a limiting factor in EAU immunopathogenesis, then manipulations that increase the number of local DC may promote EAU induction. Fresh, uncultured CD11c+ DC were isolated from BM and injected into the AC of one eye. Fresh CD11c+ cells were used to include functionally uncommitted DC, and were a mixture of approximately 75% CD11c+11b− cells and 22% CD11c+11b+ cells (Fig. 1A). The DC were largely MHC class II+ (64%), but expression of CD40, CD80 and F4/80 was associated with the smaller CD11c+11b+ subset (Fig. 1B). The APC activity of purified DC preparations was confirmed in vitro by assays with purified, naive βgal-specific T cells from βgalTCR Tg mice. Purified DC were highly efficient activators of naive T cells, showing activity at only 31 DC/well (Fig. 1C). CD69, CD62L and CD44 were also examined, but CD25 staining gave the largest difference, and remained elevated for the duration of the assay. The yield of activated T cells in these cultures correlated well with the number of DC added to the cultures, demonstrating their APC function post-purification.
FIGURE 1.
Injection of CD11c+ cells into the AC increased the severity of EAU induced by i.v. transfer of activated βgalTCR CD4 T cells. (A) Expression of CD11b on CD11c+ cells from BM. (B) Most CD11c+ cells expressed class II. CD11c+11b+ cells also expressed CD80, CD40, and F4/80. (C) Purified DC presented βgal to 5 × 103 naïve T cells from βgalTCR Tg mice shown by the increase in CD25+ cells with increased forward scatter. Cultures were harvested on day 4. The underlined number adjacent to the vertical axis is the number of live, CD4 T cells recovered from representative wells. The number of DC/well is indicated on the right. (D) EAU induction correlated with increasing doses of DCs (0 – 9 × 104) injected into the AC of the RE of recipient arrβgal mice (UN, uninjected eyes). Three × 106 activated, βgalTCR T cells were inoculated i.v. Fifteen days later, eyes were harvested for histopathology. N = 4 to 16 mice. Samples of retinal histopathology are shown in (E) saline-only AC injection, and (F) AC injection of 9 × 104 DC.
Graded numbers of fresh DC purified from BM, or saline only, were inoculated in 1 µl into the AC of the right eye (RE) of arrβgal mice, followed by activated, βgal-specific CD4 T cells injected i.v. Since the T cells were given i.v., they circulated through both eyes, while only 1 eye received DC, providing an internal control for each mouse. Mice developed EAU with an average score of 1.3 in control, unmanipulated (UN) left eyes (Fig. 1D). Increasingly severe disease was found with the combination of T cells given i.v. with increasing numbers of DC injected into the RE. Fig. 1 shows representative examples of histopathology without (panel E) and with (panel F) DC injection. Injection of 105 purified DC alone failed to induce EAU (data not shown). Control experiments using CFSE-labeled DC showed that a small fraction of DC reached the retinal parenchyma following AC injection (Supplement Fig. S1 and Supplement Tables I and II).
Since we previously proposed that circulating monocytes were precursors of recruited APC in EAU (17), fresh CD11b+11c− cells were prepared from BM by positive selection for CD11b after depletion of CD11c+ and CD19+ cells (Fig. 2A). The small number of neutrophils in this preparation have a short half-life in vivo and in vitro, and do not present Ag (29, 30). The cells were 99% CD11b+ and less than 1% CD11c+. Unlike purified CD11c+ cells, CD11b+11c− cells showed little expression of MHC class II, CD40, F4/80 and CD80 (Fig. 2B). Monocytes prepared in this manner expressed CD11c after 1 week in vitro with GM-CSF (Fig. 2C). The EAU-inducing activity of the purified monocytes was compared to fresh CD11c+ DC from BM using the AC injection route into the RE of arrβgal mice. They also received an i.v. injection of in vitro activated, βgal specific CD4 T cells. Eyes receiving the monocyte-enriched preparation developed EAU similar in severity to those receiving DC (Fig. 2D). Eyes that did not receive either APC preparation developed minimal EAU (Fig. 2D). Equivalent levels of EAU were found after i.v. injection of T cells and AC injection of either CD11c+ or CD11b+ APC (Fig. 2 F & H). These results suggested that maturation of monocytes into APC could proceed in the posterior segment environment of the retina. Injection of DC only did not provoke EAU, and showed that EAU was T cell dependent. Co-injection of Con A-activated polyclonal B10.A T cells and DC into the same eye of arrβgal mice gave no EAU, demonstrating that the T cells must be Ag specific to induce EAU (data not shown).
FIGURE 2.
Purification, phenotype and EAU-promoting activities of purified CD11b+ BM cells used in AC injections. (A) CD11b+ cells from BM were approximately 99 % pure and substantially free of CD11c+ cells. (B) A small percentage of cells expressed a low level of class II, CD80, and CD40. (C) Culture of CD11b+ cells in GM-CSF led to expression of CD11c+ by a majority of the population. (D) EAU induction was elevated to a similar degree by AC injection of 7.5 × 104 CD11b+CD11c− or CD11c+ cells into the RE followed by i.v. injection of 2 × 106 activated, βgalTCR T cells into arrβgal mice. Eyes were harvested for histopathology after 13 d (N = 4). (E – H) Representative samples of retinal histopathology are shown. Uninjected LE (E) of arrβgal recipient given 7.5 × 104 CD11c+ cells in the RE (F). Uninjected LE (G) of arrβgal recipient given 7.5 × 104 CD11b+ cells in the RE (H).
EAU induced by CD8 T cells was enhanced by transfer of APC into the AC
Our previous studies of CD8 T cell mediated EAU showed that severe photoreceptor cell loss was found, but was accompanied by much less inflammation than that induced by CD4 T cells (4). Since the target Ag (βgal) was expressed in photoreceptor cells, which express little, if any, MHC class I, a potential explanation was that Ag presentation for direct cytotoxicity was limiting. The consequences of inoculating exogenous DC directly into the AC was tested. The CD8 T cells were given i.v., but only one eye received DC. βgal+ eyes given exogenous DC developed significantly more disease than control eyes (Fig. 3). Transient development of vacuoles in the retinal pigment epithelium was frequently found in cases of severe EAU resulting from CD8 T cells (Fig. 3C). As a control for Ag-dependency of the pathogenesis, βgal-negative B10.A mice were given larger numbers of T cells and DC, but did not develop retinal disease (Fig. 3A).
FIGURE 3.
AC inoculation of CD11c+ cells into arrβgal mice increased susceptibility to EAU induction following adoptive transfer of activated CD8 T cells specific for βgal. (A) CD8 T cells (2 × 106) inoculated i.v. and DCs (4 or 7 × 104) purified from BM were inoculated as indicated into the AC of the RE. Fifteen days later, eyes were harvested for histopathology (N = 4/group). (B) Minimal histopathology was found in retinas from mice that received T cells only (B) compared to those that received T cells and DC (C). Representative histopathology is shown.
The Ag-dependency of pathogenesis was tested in experiments using DC pulsed with βgal. Ag-pulsed DC did not induce a higher level of EAU than DC that were not Ag pulsed (Fig. 4A). AC injection of Ag-pulsed DC, in combination with βgal-specific CD8 T cells given i.v., into mice lacking retinal βgal gave no EAU. Injection of T cells, DC and Ag into the same AC of B10.A controls yielded a transient accumulation of immune cells in the angle of the AC, but no retinitis or EAU was observed (data not shown). Clearly, DC promotion of disease was dependent on the presence of target Ag in the retina, the presence of retinal Ag was sufficient to support severe EAU, and addition of exogenous Ag did not support EAU induction in recipients lacking retinal βgal. To determine if AC injection of T cells and DC would give more severe EAU, activated CD8 T cells were inoculated directly into the AC of one eye of arrβgal mice, with or without DC into the same eye. Eyes receiving only CD8 T cells had an average EAU score of 1.2 while eyes receiving both T cells and DC had an average score of 4.3 (Fig. 4B). Adding 5-fold more CD8 T cells did not increase pathology. Since the DC were not loaded with βgal before inoculation, Ag was gathered locally. The doses of T cells and DC were similar to those used when the T cells were given i.v. Similar controls were done using the CD4 βgalTCR T cells, and purified DC, with and without Ag. These experiments showed that no EAU was found in the absence of βgal expression in the retina (Fig. 4F).
FIGURE 4.
AC inoculation of APC and/or βgal-specific CD8 T cells into the eyes of mice promoted EAU severity. (A) Retinal disease was dependent on the presence of βgal in the retina. Pre-incubation of DC with βgal (0.1 µM peptide TPHPARIGL, 1 h, 37°, wash twice) did not increase disease severity, and did not lead to immunopathology in βgal-negative retina. Eyes were harvested at 15 days (N = 4/group). (B) Activated CD8 T cells (× 106) and/or DC (× 104) purified from BM were inoculated together into the AC of the RE (N = 4/group). (C) The contribution of the injected DC was dose-dependent. Activated CD8 T cells (× 106) and increasing numbers of DCs (× 104), as indicated, were inoculated into the AC of the RE. (D) Pathogenicity was minimal in the absence of exogenous DC. (E) Pathogenicity of the T cells was greatly increased by concurrent injection of 6 – 10 × 104 DC. Eyes were harvested at 15 d for histopathology. (F) EAU pathogenesis by βgalTCR CD4 T cells and DC following injection into the AC also required expression of the target Ag in the retina to generate retinal inflammation.
AC injection of T cells and DC was used to test the dependence of EAU on the dose of APC. Increasing numbers of DC gave more severe CD8 T cell mediated EAU (Fig. 4C). Even though the mechanisms underlying CD4 versus CD8 T cell mediated EAU are different, similar numbers of exogenous DC promoted EAU severity for both. Sham injections with saline did not significantly increase histopathology compared to unmanipulated eyes in mice inoculated i.v. with βgal-specific CD4 or CD8 T cells (data not shown). Inoculating CD8 T cells into one eye gave no EAU in the contralateral eye, even though i.v. administration of similar numbers of T cells usually leads to EAU in both eyes. Placing T cells in one eye, and the DC in the contralateral eye also gave no EAU in the contralateral eye (data not shown). The data suggested that the intraocular environment had a substantial impact on the activity of the T cells.
Detection and identification of retinal cells with a DC phenotype
The results above supported our hypothesis that local APC function prior to EAU onset was limiting or immunoregulatory. Candidates for retinal APC include MG (31, 32) and DC (12). Quiescent mouse retina contains approximately 4,500 MG/retina that comprise the majority of CD45+ cells in retina (12, 33, 34). Small numbers of putative DC, based on staining for MHC class II or 33D1, were seen in retina by immunofluorescence (IF) (8, 9, 35), and expression of low levels of CD11c by flow cytometry (16, 33). Since CD11c has been difficult to use as a marker in fixed tissue for IF, we used CD11c-DTR/GFP Tg mice, which express GFP and the DTR in a chimeric protein, using a CD11c promoter. In peripheral immune tissues, the GFP+ cells of CD11c-DTR/GFP mice were shown to be DC with APC functions (21, 36, 37). The GFP fluorescence can be detected in retina by microscopy, and most of these cells were highly ramified (Fig. 5A). We previously reported that normal retinas contain an average of 95 GFP+ DC/retina (12). Live GFP+ DC can be flow sorted, based on GFP expression, to a high degree of purity for in vitro assays (Fig. 5B).
FIGURE 5.
Morphology of GFP+ cells in the retina of CD11c-DTR/GFP mice. (A) The ramified appearance dominated, and was found in the retinal ganglion cell/nerve fiber layer. Blood vessels were labeled with Alexa-594-conjugated isolectin B4. DC were detected by their endogenous GFP. (40X). (B) Pre- and post-sort analyses of the isolation of splenic GFP+ DC for in vitro APC assays.
T cell activation by retinal APC populations
The APC activity of retinal GFP+ DC was examined in vitro using naïve BG2×Foxp3-GFP T cells and βgal as Ag. T cells were flow sorted to remove GFP+ Tregs prior to use. GFP+ retinal DC from quiescent retina promoted upregulation of Foxp3 in BG2 T cells in co-cultures with Ag, consistent with enhanced production of inducible Tregs (Fig. 6A left). Purified MG (GFP−) isolated from quiescent retina promoted T cell survival, but only a small fraction of these cells were activated, and the majority did not express Foxp3, indicating that normal retinal MG did not significantly impact T cell function (Fig. 6A right). In contrast, GFP+ DC isolated from spleen produced a high percentage of activated T cells and few Tregs upon co-culture, consistent with our observation that peripheral DC induce βgal-specific T cell activation during induction of EAU (Fig. 6B). Although the yield of activated T cells from these microcultures is small, the activity of the DC isolated from spleen by the same procedures underscores the functional significance and reliability of the results.
FIGURE 6.
APC function of myeloid cells isolated from retina or spleen of CD11c-DTR/GFP mice. (A) Comparison of the APC activity of GFP+ DC (CD11b+45medGFP+) (filled bars) and GFP− MG (CD11b+45medGFP−) (open bars) from quiescent retina. (B) The APC activity of control splenic GFP+ DC (CD11b+45hiGFP+). (C) APC activity of T cell cultures stimulated with DC or MG from retinas given a unilateral ONC 7 d earlier. (D) Analysis of APC isolated from the contralateral retina of mice receiving an ONC 7 d earlier. All cells tested for APC activity were prepared by flow sorting for GFP+ or GFP− cells from the CD45med population of retina or the CD45hi population of spleen.
To further examine retinal DC function, splenic DC, or retinal DC from quiescent retina, were cultured with BG2 T cells and Ag, individually or together. Splenic DC showed a graded ability to produce T cells with an activated phenotype (Fig. 7). In contrast, neither retinal DC nor retinal MG activated significant numbers of T cells (Fig. 7). However, co-culture of retinal DC (60/well) and splenic DC (15/well) ablated the ability of splenic DC to induce T cell activation. Either the retinal DC regulatory activity counteracted the ability of the splenic DC to activate the T cells, perhaps by inducing anergy in T cells, or the T cells produced by exposure to DC from quiescent retina then suppressed the activation of other T cells by the splenic DC.
FIGURE 7.
Candidate APC from quiescent CD11c-DTR/GFP mouse retina or spleen were isolated by FACS for GFP+ cells, mixed with naive, BG2 TCR Tg CD4 T cells specific for βgal, and stimulated with Ag. Four days later, activated T cells (CD4+FSC+CD25+CD44hi) were counted. One set of cultures (green squares) contained the combination of 15 GFP+ splenic DCs and a titration of retinal GFP+ cells (from 60 to 15/well) to test for inhibitory activity.
DC recruitment by injury promotes EAU
Previously, we found that an ONC reversed the inhibitory activity of the endogenous regulatory response to retinal βgal in the ear-swelling assay for DTH (38). The ONC injures a small fraction of retinal neurons, stimulating an increase in the number of retinal GFP+ DC and their activation, as detected by upregulation of MHC class II expression. Accordingly, we predicted that the retinal DC injury response to an ONC might enhance EAU induction. An ONC prior to adoptive transfer of βgal-specific CD8 T cells promoted the pathogenesis of EAU (Fig. 8), consistent with an injury-induced shift in activity of retinal DC from inducing Tregs to supporting pathogenic T cells.
FIGURE 8.
The ONC injury promotes ipsilateral EAU induced by adoptive transfer of activated CD8 T cells specific for βgal. A polyclonal CD8 T cell line was activated for two days on irradiated splenocytes, pre-loaded with CD8 peptide. Three × 106 CD8 T cells were injected IP into arrβgal mice, with and without ONC performed 8 days prior to T cell transfer. Mice were euthanized and eyes were collected 21 days later.
To address whether GFP+ DC or MG from injured retina induced fewer Tregs and more effector T cells, naïve BG2×Foxp3-GFP T cells were co-cultured with retinal DC or MG purified from injured retina, and βgal. In marked contrast to their ability to induce Tregs when purified from quiescent retina, retinal DC isolated from injured retina promoted T cell activation, and few upregulated Foxp3 (Fig. 6C left). In contrast, MG from injured retina were more effective producers of Foxp3+ T cells than DC from injured retinas (Fig. 6C right), indicating that these cells gained a regulatory role, while DC gained an activating role. We previously reported that GFP+ DC in CD11c-DTR/GFP mice showed moderate recruitment to the contralateral eye following a unilateral ONC (12). When assayed for APC activity in vitro, the contralateral GFP+ DC expressed APC activity similar to DC from injured retina (Fig. 6D left). MG isolated from contralateral retinas were most similar in activity to MG from normal retina (Fig. 6D right).
These results suggested experiments to further test the local APC function of retinal DC. An ONC dramatically increased the number of MHC class II+ GFP+ DC in CD11c-DTR/GFP mice, and these cells had APC function in vitro (Fig. 6C). Conversely, GFP+ DC from quiescent retina promoted Treg development in vitro. Preliminary studies showed that quiescent retina, from wt B6 and BG2 mice, contained a small population of parenchymal T cells in the CD45hi population (Fig. 9A1; Table I). The CD3+ cells were α/β T cells; there was little or no evidence for γ/β T cells (data not shown) or NK-T cells (Fig. 9A3). NK cells were found in the CD45hi population (Fig. 9A3; Table I). Analysis of Rag-deficient mice revealed the absence of CD3+ cells (Fig. 9A2; Table I), but NK (DX5+) cells were present (Fig. 9A4). Although the number of CD3 T cells was small, control experiments using Rag-deficient mice demonstrated the reliability of their detection by flow cytometry (See Supplemental Fig. 2 for additional details). These results suggested assessment of retinal APC function by examining the T cell response to Ag in retina in vivo.
FIGURE 9.
Analysis of T cells in the retinal parenchyma revealed that retinal Tregs are most efficiently induced by injection of βgal into quiescent eyes. Representative analyses shown. A. Retina from normal B6 mice contains α/β CD3 T cells (A1) and NK cells (A3), while retina from Rag-deficient mice contained NK cells (A4), but no CD3 T cells (A2). Injection of βgal into BG2 eyes recruited additional T cells to the retina, and an increased proportion of Foxp3+ Tregs (B2) compared to control retina (B1, B3). Analysis of retina following an ONC and βgal injection showed an elevated number of T cells, but the proportion of Tregs was reduced (C1), compared to the contralateral retina (C2). Percentages of cells in the quadrants shown. Averages and statistics given in Tables I and II. Gating and analysis strategies shown in Supplemental fig. 2.
Table I.
CD3+ T cells and NK cells in quiescent murine retina.
| Mice | B6 | BG2 | Rag(−/−) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+ T cells | 43 ± 16# | 39 ± 33 | 1 ± 1 |
| NK cells (DX5+) | 14 ± 10 | ND | 49 ± 18 |
| N | 16 | 13 | 14 |
Number of cells/retina ± SD.
In comparisons of wt B6 and BG2 TCR Tg mice, injection of 5 µg of βgal into the AC of one eye of BG2 TCR Tg mice generated greater numbers of T cells in retinal parenchyma than were found in wt mice lacking βgal-specific BG2 T cells (Fig. 9B, Table IIA). In each case, unmanipulated contralateral retina was similar to normal control retina (Table IIB; and data not shown). Additional control experiments revealed that injection of saline into wt or BG2 mice recruited few T cells to the retina (Table IIB; Supplemental Fig. 2). Injection of βgal into BG2 mice on the Foxp3-GFP background showed that retinal T cells recruited by βgal injection into quiescent eyes exhibited a higher proportion of Foxp3+(GFP+)CD4+ Tregs, than was found in unmanipulated eyes or after saline injection (Fig. 9B2; Table IIA). Since in vitro assays (Fig. 6C) showed that DC isolated from retina following an ONC had a reduced ability to generate Tregs, βgal was injected into eyes that had been given an ONC 7 days earlier. Parenchymal T cells from these retinas were elevated in total number per retina, but not in their proportion of Foxp3+CD4+ T cells (Fig. 9C1; Table IIB). Contralateral retinas from these mice were shown in Fig. 9C2.
Table II.
Manipulation of the retinal environment reveals local control of CD4 T cell Ag-specific responses
| A | Mouse | BG2 | BG2 | BG2 | ||
| Pretreatment | None | None | Pvalue | ONC | Pvalue | |
| AC injection | βgal, 5 µg | Saline | βgal vs Saline | βgal, 5 µg | βgal vs βgal/ONC | |
| Number of CD3+ cells | 133 ± 83a | 60 ± 32 | 0.005 | 241 ± 234 | n.s. | |
| % Foxp3+ CD3+ cells | 17.4 ± 8.8 | 8.2 ± 4.2 | 0.002 | 9.6 ± 3.6 | 0.013 | |
| N | 9 | 13 | 9 | |||
| B | Mouse | BG2 | BG2 | BG2 | B6 | |
| Pretreatment | ONC | None | Contralateral eyesb | None | Pvalue | |
| AC injection | None | None | None | βgal, 5 µg | Versus control BG2 | |
| Number of CD3+ cells | 46 ± 50 | 32 ± 23 | 37 ± 22 | 55 ± 13 | n.s. | |
| % Foxp3+ CD3+ cells | ND | 5.4 ± 5.1 | 5.0 ± 4.8 | ND | n.s. | |
| N | 13 | 16 | 8 | 4 |
number of cells/retina
contralateral to βgal/ONC treated eyes
Discussion
The presence of immune privileged sites has been recognized since 1948, when Medawar grafted tissue into the AC of the eye and found prolonged survival of tissue in this site (13). Immune privilege has since been detected in a number of sites and cells, and includes retina and CNS (39, 40). In studies of EAU, a range of factors affecting susceptibility to EAU have been described and reveal that retinal immune privilege is based on a variety of mechanisms (6). Since adaptive immune responses have APC as a common origin, and MHC class II is a factor in EAU susceptibility (41–43), we sought to explore the role of APC in a model using Tg expression of βgal in retinal photoreceptor cells. We chose to exploit the limited susceptibility of B6 and B10.A mice to retinal autoimmune disease on the premise that their resistance to EAU resulted from potent mechanisms of immune privilege. Preliminary trials to determine if limited susceptibility to EAU could be overcome by transfer of increasing numbers of activated T cells, up to 10 – 20 × 106 T cells per mouse, revealed little increase in disease severity (unpublished observations). Since we found little evidence for retinal cells with Ag presenting ability in previous studies (16, 33), we proposed that retinal APC function was a constraint on pathogenesis, and sought strategies to locally manipulate APC. We show that provision of exogenous APC by injection of purified DC into the AC of the eye dramatically increased susceptibility of the retina to EAU induced by adoptive transfer of activated CD4 or CD8 T cells specific for βgal. We conclude that the function of retinal DC was an important determinant of the outcome of retinal immune responses.
In studies testing transfer of fresh, BM-derived DC into the eye, promotion of EAU was limited to the eye receiving exogenous APC, and the effect correlated with the number of DC that were inoculated. Although some APC injected into the AC undoubtedly escaped the eye, the strict correlation between EAU and unilateral injection of APC showed that the APC activity critical for pathogenesis was local. If the unilateral APC effect depended on APC migration to secondary lymphoid tissues and generation of T cells, then T cells generated remotely would have free access to both eyes through the circulation and would be unable to limit pathogenesis to the ipsilateral retina. Similarly, increased disease severity was unrelated to T cell access to the retina. Bypassing the circulation by intraocular injection of a number of T cells similar to that given i.v. gave only minimal EAU in the T cell-injected eye unless DC were also co-injected. Injection of a uveitogenic dose of T cells into one eye gave no EAU in the opposite eye, suggesting that the local environment altered the activity or migratory properties of the cells. Together, the ipsilateral dependency of EAU pathogenesis underscored the critical role of local Ag presentation.
Direct assay of the APC activity of myeloid cells from retina revealed effects of the retinal environment on their activity. DC residing in quiescent retina of CD11c-DTR/GFP Tg mice were isolated by their expression of GFP on the CD11c promoter, and tested for their ability to present βgal to naive BG2 T cells depleted of Foxp3+ T cells. T cells recovered from these cultures were approximately 50% Foxp3+. In contrast, MG isolated from quiescent retina better supported T cell survival in these assays, but only a small portion were activated, and fewer were Foxp3+. Upregulation of DC numbers and activity by the ONC injury gave a much different result in the APC assays; many more T cells were recovered and activated, but only 5% were Foxp3+. The activity of these DC resembled that of GFP+ splenic DC. MG from injured retina were less active, but more able to generate Foxp3+ T cells. Together, these results suggested that EAU induction might be more effective following the ONC, and this was found.
Based on the in vivo and in vitro assays and manipulations of retinal APC activity, a model for the presence and function of DC in the retina was constructed (Fig. 10). DC in normal quiescent retina are present in small numbers, and turn over slowly. Unpublished observations suggest they originate from an unidentified circulating precursor. Candidates include monocytes, or a separate lineage of DC precursors, or progenitors that pass through a local niche (Pathway 1). In vitro, these cells favored production of Foxp3+ T cells, and appeared to inhibit attempts to induce EAU.
FIGURE 10.
Model for APC function and phenotype of the DC in quiescent and injured retina. See the Discussion section for an examination of the cells and their activities. The round cell with black nucleus is in the lumen of a retinal blood vessel. The cell with a brown nucleus represents precursors that maintain the baseline level of DC in quiescent retina. They may populate and refresh a local niche, from which the parenchymal DC arise. The cell with a blue nucleus represents monocytes or other DC precursors that circulate in sufficient numbers to rapidly produce the large numbers of DC found in injured retina. The cell with a yellow nucleus represents the exogenous cells injected into the anterior chamber that support EAU induction. The green cells are the DC in the two states, resting and injury responders, that were examined for APC activity and other properties. ILM - inner limiting membrane of the retina.
DC numbers increased dramatically following a modest retinal injury, and they upregulated class II expression (12). The speed at which large numbers of these cells appeared (several thousand by 5 days post injury) suggests a relatively direct origination from circulating precursors, possibly monocytes (Pathway 2). Preliminary results suggest some may also be derived from existing retinal DC or progenitors (pathway 4). In vitro, they preferentially activated T cells, and few were Foxp3+. Their recruitment to the retina restored DTH to retinal autoantigens, and the retinas become more susceptible to EAU. These findings suggest that the retinal milieu modulated their activity, so that retinal DC promoted homeostasis in the absence of significant injury, but supported a T cell response following injury.
A small portion of DC or monocytes isolated from spleen or BM and injected into the AC entered the retina, bypassing the circulation and extravasation through the vascular endothelium (Pathway 3). This route may have produced a critical difference in their function, as they promoted EAU induction in the absence of an injury to the retina. The physiologic extravasation process of precursors entering the quiet retina may enhance their regulatory function; conversely, DC or monocyte precursors that bypassed the extravasation process promoted EAU induction. This route may be little used in normal retina, but the posterior segment of inflamed retina contains many cells that could enter in this manner. As the retina returns to a quiescent state after an injury or inflammation, the excess DC may exit or enter apoptosis to facilitate their removal. Since there is no evidence for lymphatic drainage of live cells from the retina, they may exit by reverse trans-endothelial migration, the movement of cells from an ablumenal space (retinal parenchyma) into the lumen of blood vessels (44–47) (Pathway 5), or other undemonstrated route.
The significance of local recognition of a retinal Ag found in this study is consistent with our previous observation that an ONC changed the balance of effector:regulatory activity to a retinal protein. In that study, the endogenous regulatory response to a retinal Ag inhibited the systemic DTH response to that Ag measured by the ear swelling assay. After an ONC, the regulatory activity was lost, and full-scale ear swelling was found (22). Together, the data suggests that this balance of T cell activity to an Ag in an immune privileged site is a dynamic process dependent on the nature of the local recognition of Ag. We propose that the small number of DC present in quiescent retina belies their critical role in maintaining the endogenous regulatory response that protects retina from autoimmunity. Their rapid response to stimuli, in which their numbers are rapidly elevated and their function is modified to support T cell activation, further demonstrate a central role in local immune homeostasis of an immune privileged tissue. These rapid changes in response to manipulations suggest a sentinel role. In other tissues, migration to draining lymph nodes would be the likely outcome. For the retina, which lacks lymphatics, their route out of the retina and their destination is presently unclear.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Heidi Roehrich for histology and Thien Sam for technical assistance.
Footnotes
This work was supported by NIH grants NIH R01-EY011542 (dsg), R01-EY016376 (dsg), T32-EY007133 (ul), and P30-EY011374. Additional support was provided by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, and the Minnesota Lions Clubs.
Abbreviations: EAU, experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis; βgal, β-galactosidase; DTR, diphtheria toxin receptor; DTx, diphtheria toxin; DC, dendritic cell; MG, microglia; ILM, inner limiting membrane; ONC, optic nerve crush; BM, bone marrow: Treg, regulatory T cells; AC, anterior chamber of the eye.
References
- 1.Lee HK, Iwasaki A. Innate control of adaptive immunity: dendritic cells and beyond. Semin. Immunol. 2007;19:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Villadangos JA, Schnorrer P. Intrinsic and cooperative antigen-presenting functions of dendritic-cell subsets in vivo. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:543–555. doi: 10.1038/nri2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gregerson DS, Obritsch WF, Fling SP, Cameron JD. S-antigen-specific rat T cell lines recognize peptide fragments of S-antigen and mediate experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis and pinealitis. J. Immunol. 1986;136:2875–2882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McPherson SW, Heuss ND, Roehrich H, Gregerson DS. Bystander killing of neurons by cytotoxic T cells specific for a glial antigen. Glia. 2006;53:457–466. doi: 10.1002/glia.20298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McPherson SW, Yang J, Chan CC, Dou C, Gregerson DS. Resting CD8 T cells recognize beta-galactosidase expressed in the immune-privileged retina and mediate autoimmune disease when activated. Immunology. 2003;110:386–396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01750.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Caspi RR. A look at autoimmunity and inflammation in the eye. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:3073–3083. doi: 10.1172/JCI42440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ben-Nun A, Wekerle H, Cohen I. The rapid isolation of clonable antigen-specific T lymphocyte lines capable of mediating autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Eur. J. Immunol. 1981;11:195–199. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830110307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu H, Chen M, Mayer EJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD. Turnover of resident retinal microglia in the normal adult mouse. Glia. 2007;55:1189–1198. doi: 10.1002/glia.20535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu H, Dawson R, Forrester JV, Liversidge J. Identification of novel dendritic cell populations in normal mouse retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48:1701–1710. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Greter M, Heppner FL, Lemos MP, Odermatt BM, Goebels N, Laufer T, Noelle RJ, Becher B. Dendritic cells permit immune invasion of the CNS in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 2005;11:328–334. doi: 10.1038/nm1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McMahon EJ, Bailey SL, Miller SD. CNS dendritic cells: critical participants in CNS inflammation? Neurochem. Int. 2006;49:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lehmann U, Heuss ND, McPherson SW, Roehrich H, Gregerson DS. Dendritic cells are early responders to retinal injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010;40:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Medawar P. Immunity to homologous grafted skin: III. The fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1948;29:58–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stein-Streilein J, Streilein JW. Anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID): Regulation, biological relevance, and implications for therapy. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2002;21:123–152. doi: 10.1080/08830180212066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matzinger P, Kamala T. Tissue-based class control: the other side of tolerance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:221–230. doi: 10.1038/nri2940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gregerson DS, Sam TN, McPherson SW. The antigen-presenting activity of fresh, adult parenchymal microglia and perivascular cells from retina. J. Immunol. 2004;172:6587–6597. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gregerson DS, Kawashima H. APC derived from donor splenocytes support retinal autoimmune disease in allogeneic recipients. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004;76:383–387. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0404249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sunayashiki-Kusuzaki K, Kikuchi T, Wawrousek EF, Shinohara T. Arrestin and phosducin are expressed in a small number of brain cells. Molec. Brain Res. 1997;52:112–120. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00247-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gregerson DS, Dou C. Spontaneous induction of immunoregulation by an endogenous retinal antigen. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43:2984–2991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McPherson SW, Heuss ND, Gregerson DS. Lymphopenia-induced proliferation is a potent activator for CD4+ T cell mediated autoimmune disease in the retina. J. Immunol. 2009;182:969–979. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jung S, Unutmaz D, Wong P, Sano G, De los Santos K, Sparwasser T, Wu S, Vuthoori S, Ko K, Zavala F, Pamer EG, Littman DR, Lang RA. In vivo depletion of CD11c(+) dendritic cells abrogates priming of CD8(+) T cells by exogenous cell-associated antigens. Immunity. 2002;17:211–220. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00365-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gregerson DS, Heuss ND, Lehmann U, McPherson SW. Peripheral induction of tolerance by retinal antigen expression. J. Immunol. 2009;183:814–822. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tewalt EF, Grant JM, Granger EL, Palmer DC, Heuss ND, Gregerson DS, Restifo NP, Norbury CC. Viral sequestration of antigen subverts cross presentation to CD8(+) T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000457. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li Y, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. Experimental induction of retinal ganglion cell death in adult mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999;40:1004–1008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dick LR, Aldrich C, Jameson SC, Moomaw CR, Pramanik BC, Doyle CK, DeMartino GN, Bevan MJ, Forman JM, Slaughter CA. Proteolytic processing of ovalbumin and beta-galactosidase by the proteasome to a yield antigenic peptides. J. Immunol. 1994;152:3884–3894. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Winkler BS. Glycolytic and oxidative metabolism in relation to retinal function. J. Gen. Physiol. 1981;77:667–692. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.6.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Caspi RR, Roberge FG, McAllister CG, el-Saied M, Kuwabara T, Gery I, Hanna E, Nussenblatt RB. T cell lines mediating experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) in the rat. J. Immunol. 1986;136:928–933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boxio R, Bossenmeyer-Pourie C, Steinckwich N, Dournon C, Nusse O. Mouse bone marrow contains large numbers of functionally competent neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004;75:604–611. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0703340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lord BI, Molineux G, Pojda Z, Souza LM, Mermod JJ, Dexter TM. Myeloid cell kinetics in mice treated with recombinant interleukin-3, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF), or granulocyte-macrophage CSF in vivo. Blood. 1991;77:2154–2159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou R, Caspi RR. Ocular immune privilege. F1000 Biol Rep. 2010;2 doi: 10.3410/B2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Damsker JM, Hansen AM, Caspi RR. Th1 and Th17 cells: adversaries and collaborators. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 2010;1183:211–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gregerson DS, Yang J. CD45-positive cells of the retina and their responsiveness to in vivo and in vitro treatment with IFN-gamma or anti-CD40. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44:3083–3093. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garcia-Valenzuela E, Sharma SC, Pina AL. Multilayered retinal microglial response to optic nerve transection in rats. Mol. Vis. 2005;11:225–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hu P, Pollard J, Hunt N, Chan-Ling T. Microvascular and cellular responses in the retina of rats with acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) Brain Pathol. 1998;8:487–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00170.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tian T, Woodworth J, Skold M, Behar SM. In vivo depletion of CD11c+ cells delays the CD4+ T cell response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and exacerbates the outcome of infection. J. Immunol. 2005;175:3268–3272. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.3268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bennett CL, Clausen BE. DC ablation in mice: promises, pitfalls, and challenges. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:519–525. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gregerson DS, Heuss ND, Lehmann U, McPherson SW. Evidence for extrathymic generation of regulatory T cells specific for a retinal antigen. Ophthalmic Res. 2008;40:154–159. doi: 10.1159/000119868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carson MJ, Doose JM, Melchior B, Schmid CD, Ploix CC. CNS immune privilege: hiding in plain sight. Immunol. Rev. 2006;213:48–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00441.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Streilein JW. Ocular immune privilege: the eye takes a dim but practical view of immunity and inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003;74:179–185. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1102574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Caspi RR, Grubbs BG, Chan CC, Chader GJ, Wiggert B. Genetic control of susceptibility to experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in the mouse model. Concomitant regulation by MHC and non-MHC genes. J. Immunol. 1992;148:2384–2389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Caspi RR, Chan CC, Leake WC, Higuchi M, Wiggert B, Chader GJ. Experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in mice. Induction by a single eliciting event and dependence on quantitative parameters of immunization. J. Autoimmun. 1990;3:237–246. doi: 10.1016/0896-8411(90)90143-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sun B, Rizzo LV, Sun SH, Chan CC, Wiggert B, Wilder RL, Caspi RR. Genetic susceptibility to experimental autoimmune uveitis involves more than a predisposition to generate a T helper-1-like or a T helper-2-like response. J. Immunol. 1997;159:1004–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Randolph GJ, Luther T, Albrecht S, Magdolen V, Muller WA. Role of tissue factor in adhesion of mononuclear phagocytes to and trafficking through endothelium in vitro. Blood. 1998;92:4167–4177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Muller WA, Randolph GJ. Migration of leukocytes across endothelium and beyond: molecules involved in the transmigration and fate of monocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1999;66:698–704. doi: 10.1002/jlb.66.5.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.D'Amico G, Bianchi G, Bernasconi S, Bersani L, Piemonti L, Sozzani S, Mantovani A, Allavena P. Adhesion, transendothelial migration, and reverse transmigration of in vitro cultured dendritic cells. Blood. 1998;92:207–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bradfield PF, Scheiermann C, Nourshargh S, Ody C, Luscinskas FW, Rainger GE, Nash GB, Miljkovic-Licina M, Aurrand-Lions M, Imhof BA. JAM-C regulates unidirectional monocyte transendothelial migration in inflammation. Blood. 2007;110:2545–2555. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.










