Skip to main content
The Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery logoLink to The Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery
. 2011 Winter;19(4):153–155. doi: 10.1177/229255031101900405

Is radiotherapy an effective treatment option for recurrent metastatic malignant melanoma? A case report of short-course, large-fraction radiation and a literature review

Abhirami Hallock 1, Olga Vujovic 1,, Edward Yu 1
PMCID: PMC3269204  PMID: 23204890

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is regarded to be radiation resistant. A case of recurrent malignant melanoma with in-transit metastasis treated with short-course, high-fraction palliative radiation is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of radiotherapy.

METHOD

An 80-year-old woman initially treated surgically for a primary malignant melanoma of the left lower leg presented with multiple in-transit metastases. Palliative radiation was offered to treat two fungating in-transit masses that were resistant to treatments of isolated limb infusion and intralesional interleukin-2.

RESULTS

Treatment consisted of short-course, high-fraction radiation with 800 cGy fractions given over three weeks on days 0, 7 and 21, for a total dose of 2400 cGy. She experienced a complete response that was maintained for six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation is an effective treatment option for palliation of recurrent malignant melanoma. Complete response is possible even with short-course, high-fraction radiation.

Keywords: In-transit metastases, Recurrent malignant melanoma, Short-course radiation


Recurrent malignant melanoma presents a treatment challenge, with few long-term survivors with advanced stage disease. Patients with stage IV metastatic disease have a dismal outcome, with a reported five-year survival rate of 5%. However, patients with stage IIIC disease (2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification system) who have more than four nodal metastases or in-transit metastases, have a significant expected five-year survival of 40% (1). It is, therefore, important to achieve effective palliation for this group of patients.

Traditionally, malignant melanoma has been considered to be a relatively radioresistant tumour (2,3). This belief has led to patients with recurrent or advanced-stage cutaneous malignant melanoma either not being referred for radiotherapy or being referred as a last resort.

We report a case involving a patient with an advanced locoregional recurrence of a cutaneous malignant melanoma who was referred for palliative radiation as a last resort after failed attempts with numerous other treatment options, including repeat surgical excisions, isolated limb infusion and intralesional injections with interleukin-2.

The present case illustrates the effectiveness of radiation as a treatment option for palliation of advanced-stage malignant melanoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old woman presented with a superficial spreading melanoma of the left posterior calf, three years before her referral for a radiation oncology consultation. She was initially treated with excision and skin grafting, with pathology confirming a 0.5 mm superficial spreading malignant melanoma (T1N0M0), which was completely excised. She was otherwise well and clinical examination revealed no evidence of metastatic disease.

She remained well for two-and-a-half years, at which time she developed numerous in-transit metastases confined to the left lower extremity. Over the following six months, she underwent 12 additional excisions for the in-transit disease. Because she continued to have intractable in-transit disease she was referred for isolated limb infusion therapy. This controlled all of the lesions except for two, and was associated with severe complications including skin breakdown and necrosis. The two resistant lesions continued to grow in size, and repeat biopsies confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma. Further attempts at treating these two lesions included intralesional inter-leukin-2 therapy, which failed, and an additional attempt at resection, which was incomplete because the tumour was wrapping around the tibial nerve and artery. At this point, she was referred for consideration of palliative radiotherapy.

When she was seen in consultation, she was symptomatic, with pain and swelling of the left lower leg that prevented her from wearing a shoe and walking, which was an activity she had previously enjoyed. She was also anemic from ongoing bleeding of the two fungating in-transit metastases.

Physical examination of the left leg revealed two large, black, fun-gating skin lesions measuring 4 cm each, located over the medial malleolus and the lower medial calf (Figure 1). She exhibited no inguinal adenopathy or other clinical evidence of metastatic disease.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Left lower leg of an 80-year-old woman showing two large, fun-gating, in-transit metasases

She was offered palliative radiotherapy for the two resistant lesions using a short-course, large-fraction radiation schedule because the patient lived 4 h away and was not able to undergo daily radiation treatments.

The radiation treatment consisted of a 800 cGy fraction size delivered in three fractions over three weeks on days 0, 7 and 21, for a total dose of 2400 cGy. Each lesion was treated with a separate electron radiation field, which treated the lesions while sparing underlying normal structures. She tolerated the radiation well without side effects, and the lesions showed a progressive response with a decrease in size and cessation of bleeding with each fraction of radiation.

At first follow-up at three months, she demonstrated an excellent response, with complete resolution of the lesions and complete healing of the overlying skin (Figure 2). She also had resolution of her leg pain and edema, and was able to wear shoes and walk again. At six months, a small (<1 cm) recurrent nodule was present at the edge of one of her radiation fields, which was otherwise asymptomatic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The same leg showing complete resolution of the two tumours, three months following short-course, high-fraction size radiation

At one year, following her radiotherapy, she developed numerous, rapidly progressing, in-transit metastases of the left lower leg and was offered an above-knee amputation.

DISCUSSION

Surgery is the mainstay for treatment of primary malignant melanoma and recurrent disease, especially locoregional recurrences. However, when surgery is no longer feasible, patients should be referred for other treatment options.

As previously stated, with respect to radiotherapy, the prevailing belief is that malignant melanoma is radioresistant. However, there have also been reports to the contrary, showing radiosensitivity of malignant melanoma (4,5). There has also been controversy over the most effective dose fractionation in treating malignant melanoma. The most commonly used dose fraction size in the adjuvant setting is 200 cGy per fraction, given daily over several weeks. However, for malignant melanoma, there has been evidence supporting significantly better response rates with fraction sizes ≥600 cGy (68). However, a recent, prospective, randomized trial comparing high-dose per fraction radiation (800 cGy) with standard fractionation (250 cGy) showed no difference in response rates (9). Regardless of the dose per fraction schedule, these studies have shown significant response rates, with overall response rates (ORR) of 70%, with complete responses of 25% (9,10). In comparison, the ORR with dacarbazine, the standard chemotherapy drug for metastatic melanomas, is 10%. Isolated limb infusion used for in-transit metastasis has a higher ORR of 85%, but is associated with significant side effects including skin necrosis and a risk of requiring limb amputation (11). In contrast, radiation of skin metastasis is well tolerated with minimal side effects, as shown in the case example, and can be administered in a convenient short-course schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent malignant melanoma remains a treatment challenge, with a propensity for progressive recurrence despite all available treatments. These tumours should no longer be considered radioresistant. Palliative radiation should be considered early in the management of recurrent disease and should not be a treatment of last resort, which has been the tradition in the past.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong S. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barranco SC, Romsdahl M, Humphrey RM. The radiation response of human malignant melanoma cells grown in vitro. Cancer Res. 1972;31:830–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Doss LL, Memula N. The radio respnsiveness of melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982;8:1131–4. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trott KR, von Lievein H, Kummermehr J. The radiosensitivity of malignant melanomas, Part I: Experimental sudies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981;7:9–13. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(81)90053-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Trott KR, von Lievein H, Kummermehr J. The radiosensitivity of malignant melanomas, Part II: Clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981;7:15–20. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(81)90054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Habermalz HJ, Fisher JJ. Radiation therapy of malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1976;38:2258–62. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197612)38:6<2258::aid-cncr2820380611>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adam JE, Habeshaw T, Kirk J. Response rate of malignant melanoma to large fraction irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1982;55:605–7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-55-656-605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Overgaard J. Radiation treatment of malignant melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980;6:41–4. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sause WT, Cooper JS, Rush S. Fraction size in external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;3:429–32. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90053-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Palliative radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic malignant melanoma: Prognostic factors for tumor response and long-term outcome: A 20-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:607–18. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00066-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lindnér P, Doubrovsky A, Kam PC, Thompson JF. Prognostic factors after isolated limb infusion with cytotoxic agents for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:127–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02557363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Pulsus Group

RESOURCES