Abstract
STAT4 has been identified as a genetic risk factor for the development of autoimmune diseases including systemic sclerosis. STAT4 regulates Th1 cell development and cell-mediated immunity, but it is not known how it may regulate the development of dermal fibrosis. Using the bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis model, it has now been demonstrated that STAT4-deficient mice have reduced dermal fibrosis in part via STAT4-dependent alterations in T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. These data stress the importance of STAT4 in autoimmune diseases such as systemic sclerosis and provide an important direction for future research to improve our understanding of systemic sclerosis pathogenesis.
Keywords: dermal fibrosis, STAT4, systemic sclerosis
Systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) is a multi-system disease clinically characterized by progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs [1]. Although the underlying pathogenesis is not fully understood, multiple lines of evidence point to inflammation and autoimmunity as a cause of the disease. Indeed, biopsies of early SSc skin demonstrate perivascular infiltrates of mononuclear inflammatory cells that lead to increased numbers of myofibroblasts and increased dermal thickness with thick collagen bundles found in biopsies of established SSc skin [2]. Autoimmunity is best exemplified by the presence of multiple but nonoverlapping SSc-associated autoantibodies that help define unique clinical subsets of patients [3]. Additional support for immune alterations in SSc comes from studies demonstrating increased circulating cytokines and, more recently, the identification of increased expression of genes involved in the type I interferon pathways [4,5]. More recently, genetic studies have strongly implicated autoimmunity and inflammation in SSc pathogenesis. These studies have demonstrated associations of polymorphisms in multiple genes involved in regulation of the immune responses such as IRF5, TNFSF4, PTPN22 and STAT4. (reviewed in [6]).
STAT4 is a member of the signal transducer and activators of transcription (STAT) family of molecules. These proteins are the molecular link from the cell surface cytokine receptors to the nucleus, where they serve as critical transcription factors. STAT4 expression is relatively restricted, with high expression in lymphoid and myeloid tissue, although more recent studies suggest that it might be expressed in other tissues as well. STAT4 is phosphorylated in response to IL-12 and IL-23 receptor activation, and is an important regulator of Th1 development [7,8]. STAT4 is also activated in response to type I interferons. Polymorphisms in the STAT4 gene region have been associated with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus [9]. More recently, STAT4 has also been identified as a susceptibility factor for the development of SSc [10].
How these polymorphisms in STAT4 alter its function and lead to the development of these autoimmune diseases remains unknown. Furthermore, a role for STAT4 in the development of SSc has not been determined either. The recent article published by Avouac and colleagues sought to determine the contribution of STAT4 to the development of dermal fibrosis in two murine models of dermal fibrosis [11].
Methods & results
In the current report, STAT4-deficient (stat4-/-) mice were compared with wild-type mice in two different models of dermal fibrosis. The first model of fibrosis evaluated was bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis. In this model, mice are administered daily subcutaneous injections of bleomycin or saline for 3 weeks starting at 6 weeks old. The TSK-1 murine model was also used. This mouse model is caused by a dominant mutation in the fibrillin 1 gene and is less dependent on inflammation. In both models, the amount of fibrosis in the skin was quantified and compared in stat4-/- mice and wild-type mice.
Using the bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis model, the authors demonstrated that stat4-/- mice had reduced dermal thickness after bleomycin injection compared with wild-type mice. There was also a reduction in accumulation of collagen and the number of α-smooth muscle actin-positive myofibroblasts in the dermis of stat4-/- mice relative to wild-type mice. These data support an important role for STAT4 in the matrix deposition and the development of dermal fibrosis.
In addition to changes in fibrosis, stat4-/- mice also had a reduction in dermal inflammation after bleomycin injection. Stat4-/- mice had a reduction in infiltrating leukocytes, in particular CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but not B cells or monocytes. The reduction in numbers of Ki-67+ T cells suggests that STAT4 regulated T-cell proliferation in lesional skin. To further characterize the reduction in inflammation, cytokine levels in serum and skin lysates were compared. Subcutaneous bleomycin resulted in a relative increase in serum and dermal IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-2 in wild-type but not stat4-/- mice. Interestingly, stat4-/- mice had similar levels of dermal IL-4, IL-5 and TGF-β after bleomycin injection compared with wild-type mice despite the reduction in dermal fibrosis. Together, these data suggest that STAT4 contributes to the development of dermal fibrosis in part by controlling T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.
In contrast to the bleomycin-induced fibrosis model, fibrosis in the skin in the TSK-1 model was not dependent on STAT4. Stat4-/- mice were crossed with the TSK-1 mouse to generate mice with the fibrillin 1 mutation and lacking stat4 (stat4-/- /Tsk1). There was no difference in hypodermal thickness, extracellular matrix deposition, and numbers of myofibroblasts between stat4-/-/Tsk1 mice versus wild-type controls. These data demonstrate that STAT4 is not required for dermal fibrosis in the TSK-1 mouse model.
Discussion
In the current report, Avouac and colleagues demonstrate a role for STAT4 in the development of dermal fibrosis. These data are the first to show a functional importance of STAT4 for dermal fibrosis with important implications for SSc. Lesional skin from stat4-/- mice had reduced numbers of fibrotic and inflammatory end points in the bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis model, but not the TSK-1 model. While inflammation is classically seen in the bleomycin model, the TSK-1 model is characterized by fibroblast changes and less dependent on inflammation. The data suggest that STAT4 regulates dermal fibrosis through orchestration of leukocyte infiltration, proliferation and cytokine production. However, they do not rule out the possibility that STAT4 may regulate other cellular populations such as the fibroblast in other systems. Additional studies such as bone marrow chimeric experiments would be of great value in further substantiating this hypothesis and are important to advance our understanding of how STAT4 mediates dermal fibrosis and SSc.
STAT4 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to SSc [10,12,13]. A comparison of SSc patients and healthy controls in five European cohorts demonstrated an association of the STAT4 rs7574865 T allele with SSc [10]. This association has been confirmed in multiple studies, including a recent genome-wide association study [12-15]. Gene–gene interaction studies have also demonstrated an additive effect of STAT4 and IRF5 with regards to SSc susceptibility [12]. Furthermore, an interaction of STAT4 with TBX21, which encodes a transcription factor involved in Th1 development, has also been demonstrated with regards to SSc susceptibility [13]. Together, these studies identify and confirm that STAT4 is an important genetic risk factor for the development of SSc.
The current paper sheds light on the mechanism by which STAT4 contributes to the development of dermal fibrosis. After administration of bleomycin, stat4-/- mice had reduced levels of Th1 cytokines, IFN-γ and IL-2, with similar levels of Th2 cytokines, relative to wild-type mice. It is known that STAT4 activation is a key step in the IL-12-induced differentiation of naive T-helper cells into Th1 cells [7]. There have been conflicting reports in the literature regarding the role of the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in SSc, which may reflect different stages of the disease process or heterogeneity amongst SSc patients [16-18]. However, based on the genetic association of STAT4 with SSc, the importance of STAT4 in the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance and the current findings it is likely that STAT4 regulation of T-cell function plays a role in SSc pathogenesis.
In addition to Th1 development, STAT4 may also contribute to the development of dermal fibrosis through additional pathways. Genetic and functional studies have implicated type I interferons in SSc [5,19]. Type I interferons induce an inflammatory response in dermal fibroblasts that is accentuated in dermal fibroblasts from SSc patients relative to normal control subjects [20,21]. Interestingly, type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) can also promote STAT4 activation and induce IFN-γ production by Th1 cells. However, type I interferon activation of STAT4 has been observed in human but not murine T cells due to species-specific differences in the cytoplasmic domain of the IFNAR2 subunit [22]. Therefore, the murine models used to determine the molecular pathways involved in the development of dermal fibrosis are suboptimal to investigate the potential role of STAT4 in the type I interferon response and the current data cannot rule out these possibilities. It therefore remains possible that in SSc, STAT4 and its polymorphisms could lead to alterations in the type I interferon pathways in T cells or dermal fibroblasts.
In summary, multiple genetic and functional studies now implicate STAT4 as a mediator in the development of dermal fibrosis. Through the regulation of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production, STAT4 likely regulates fibroblast function and therefore dermal fibrosis. Future studies must determine the specific cytokine pathways and cells that are regulated by STAT4 and how these lead to the development of dermal fibrosis. In addition, it will be important to understand how the polymorphisms in STAT4 that are associated with SSc susceptibility alter the expression and/or function of STAT4 and relate these changes to the pathogenesis of SSc. The paper by Avouac and colleagues provides us with the first functional studies of how STAT4 mediates dermal fibrosis, but is only the beginning.
Five-year view
Systemic sclerosis is a potentially devastating autoimmune disease with no proven disease-modifying treatments and minimally reliable diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. STAT4 is emerging as a potential target that may translate to clinical care. It is not clear if STAT4 itself will be the target or if these data serve to identify potential pathways of autoimmunity and dysregulation. However, in the next few years, it is anticipated that our knowledge of how STAT4 regulates lymphocyte function and dermal fibrosis will expand. These data will allow us to better understand the pathways and network of proteins that lead to the development of SSc and help to identify cytokines and cellular targets. Indeed, the current paper noted that IL-6 levels were elevated in serum and skin of mice injected with bleomycin and reduced IL-6 in the absence of STAT4. These intriguing data suggest that IL-6 may then be a suitable therapeutic target in SSc.
Finally, over the next 5 years, our understanding of how polymorphisms in STAT4 alter immune function and lead to SSc will begin to emerge. The candidate gene association studies have provided valuable information about SSc pathogenesis, however, these studies are only the framework from which our understanding of this complex autoimmune immune disease will be built on. SSc is a polygenic autoimmune disease, and each polymorphism contributes a small, but important risk to its development. The key to understanding how STAT4 contributes to SSc pathogenesis will start with identifying the causal variants in the STAT4 gene regions and expanding our knowledge of gene–gene interactions. In the next few years, combining the genetic studies with human and murine functional studies will provide the foundation to translate these basic science findings to the clinical care of SSc patients.
Key issues.
STAT-4-deficient mice demonstrated reduced fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis model.
There was no difference in fibrosis in the STAT-4-deficient TSK-1 mouse model of dermal fibrosis compared to litter mate controls.
STAT-4 may contribute to the development of dermal fibrosis through regulation of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by NIH/NIAMS-K08AR054404 (Sandeep K Agarwal).
Footnotes
Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Charles C, Clements P, Furst DE. Systemic sclerosis: hypothesis-driven treatment strategies. Lancet. 2006;367(9523):1683–1691. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68737-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fleischmajer R, Perlish JS, Reeves JR. Cellular infiltrates in scleroderma skin. Arthritis Rheum. 1977;20(4):975–984. doi: 10.1002/art.1780200410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arnett FC. Is scleroderma an autoantibody mediated disease? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18(6):579–581. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000245726.33006.c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gourh P, Arnett FC, Assassi S, et al. Plasma cytokine profiles in systemic sclerosis: associations with autoantibody subsets and clinical manifestations. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R147. doi: 10.1186/ar2821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan FK, Zhou X, Mayes MD, et al. Signatures of differentially regulated interferon gene expression and vasculotrophism in the peripheral blood cells of systemic sclerosis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45(6):694–702. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agarwal SK. The genetics of systemic sclerosis. Discov Med. 2010;10(51):134–143. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nishikomori R, Usui T, Wu CY, Morinobu A, O’Shea JJ, Strober W. Activated STAT4 has an essential role in Th1 differentiation and proliferation that is independent of its role in the maintenance of IL-12R β 2 chain expression and signaling. J Immunol. 2002;169(8):4388–4398. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watford WT, Hissong BD, Bream JH, Kanno Y, Muul L, O’Shea JJ. Signaling by IL-12 and IL-23 and the immunoregulatory roles of STAT4. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:139–156. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Remmers EF, Plenge RM, Lee AT, et al. STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(10):977–986. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rueda B, Broen J, Simeon C, et al. The STAT4 gene influences the genetic predisposition to systemic sclerosis phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(11):2071–2077. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Avouac J, Furnrohr BG, Tomcik M, et al. Inactivation of the transcription factor STAT-4 prevents inflammation-driven fibrosis in animal models of systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):800–809. doi: 10.1002/art.30171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dieude P, Guedj M, Wipff J, et al. STAT4 is a genetic risk factor for systemic sclerosis having additive effects with IRF5 on disease susceptibility and related pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(8):2472–2479. doi: 10.1002/art.24688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gourh P, Agarwal SK, Divecha D, et al. Polymorphisms in TBX21 and STAT4 increase the risk of systemic sclerosis: evidence of possible gene–gene interaction and alterations in Th1/Th2 cytokines. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(12):3794–3806. doi: 10.1002/art.24958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tsuchiya N, Kawasaki A, Hasegawa M, et al. Association of STAT4 polymorphism with systemic sclerosis in a Japanese population. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(8):1375–1376. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.111310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Radstake TR, Gorlova O, Rueda B, et al. Genome-wide association study of systemic sclerosis identifies CD247 as a new susceptibility locus. Nat Genet. 2010;42(5):426–429. doi: 10.1038/ng.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mavalia C, Scaletti C, Romagnani P, et al. Type 2 helper T-cell predominance and high CD30 expression in systemic sclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1997;151(6):1751–1758. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Needleman BW, Wigley FM, Stair RW. Interleukin-1, interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor α, and interferon-γ levels in sera from patients with scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(1):67–72. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Molteni M, Della BS, Mascagni B, et al. Increased interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels produced in vitro by alloactivated T lymphocytes in systemic sclerosis and Raynaud’s phenomenon. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;116(1):164–168. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00842.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dieude P, Guedj M, Wipff J, et al. Association between the IRF5 rs2004640 functional polymorphism and systemic sclerosis: a new perspective for pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(1):225–233. doi: 10.1002/art.24183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Farina GA, York MR, Di MM, et al. Poly(I:C) drives type I IFN- and TGFβ-mediated inflammation and dermal fibrosis simulating altered gene expression in systemic sclerosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2583–2593. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Agarwal SK, Wu M, Livingston CK, et al. Toll-like receptor 3 upregulation by type I interferon in healthy and scleroderma dermal fibroblasts. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(1):R3. doi: 10.1186/ar3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tyler DR, Persky ME, Matthews LA, Chan S, Farrar JD. Pre-assembly of STAT4 with the human IFN-α/β receptor-2 subunit is mediated by the STAT4 N-domain. Mol Immunol. 2007;44(8):1864–1872. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]