Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Dec;119(Suppl 1):226–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00834.x

Expression of kallikrein 4 (Klk4) in dental and non-dental tissues

James P Simmer 1, Amelia S Richardson 1, Charles E Smith 1,2, Yuanyuan Hu 1, Jan C-C Hu 1
PMCID: PMC3270893  NIHMSID: NIHMS318351  PMID: 22243250

Abstract

Kallikrein 4 (Klk4) is critical for proper dental enamel formation. Klk4 null mice and persons with two defective KLK4 alleles have obvious enamel defects, with no other apparent phenotype. Klk4 mRNA or protein is reported to be in tissues besides teeth, including prostate, ovary, kidney, liver, and salivary gland. In this study we used the Klk4 knockout/NLS-lacZ knockin mouse to assay Klk4 expression using ß-galactosidase histochemistry. Incubations for 5 h were used to detect Klk4 expression with minimal endogenous background, while overnight incubations susceptible to false positives were used to look for trace Klk4 expression. Developing maxillary molars at postnatal days 5, 6, 7, 8, and 14, developing mandibular incisors at postnatal day 14, and selected non-dental tissues from adult wild-type and Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice were examined by X-gal histochemistry. After 5 h incubation, Xgal staining was observed specifically in the nuclei of maturation stage ameloblasts in molars and incisors from Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice and was detected weakly in nuclei of salivary gland ducts and patches of prostate epithelia. We conclude that Klk4 is predominantly a tooth-specific protease with low expression in submandibular salivary gland and prostate, and with no detectable expression in liver, kidney, testis, ovary, oviduct, epididymis, and vas deferens.

Keywords: enamel, kallikrein, proteases, amelogenesis imperfecta, submandibular salivary gland


Secretory stage ameloblasts export three enamel matrix proteins: amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin (1). These proteins are cleaved extracellularly, and their digested products accumulate in the enamel matrix (2-4). The cleavage sites that generate many secretory stage enamel components have been characterized (5-9). Matrix metalloproteinase 20 (Mmp20) is expressed during the secretory stage (10), and in vitro analyses have demonstrated that Mmp20 is uniquely capable of catalyzing all of these cleavages (11-14). This proteolytic activity is necessary for proper enamel formation as Mmp20 null mice (15) and persons with MMP20 mutations produce defective enamel (16-19). During the maturation stage, the enamel layer hardens by widening and thickening hydroxyapatite crystals deposited during the secretory stage (20, 21). Kallikrein 4 (Klk4) is a glycosylated, chymotrypsin-like serine protease that is expressed and secreted by maturation stage ameloblasts (22-25). Klk4 degrades enamel proteins (26), which facilitates their reabsorption by maturation ameloblasts (27). In the absence of Klk4, accumulated enamel proteins are retained in the matrix and the crystals don’t fully mature (28). Klk4 null mice (28) and persons with KLK4 mutations (29) show enamel defects with no noticeable abnormalities elsewhere in the body. These findings suggest that Mmp20 and Klk4 both serve tooth-specific functions (30). In the case of Mmp20, this specificity is supported by data showing that Mmp20 has degenerated into a pseudogene in whales that have lost the ability to make teeth or enamel (31).

Klk4 is routinely isolated from developing teeth (12, 26), but has not been isolated from any other tissue. Klk4 mRNA and Klk4 antigen have been detected in tissues besides teeth, but the findings are inconsistent. Immunoassays of 38 healthy adult tissues detected KLK4 primarily in prostate, with no expression in liver, colon, or pituitary (32). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELIZA) assays of 37 tissues from healthy adults found that KLK4 was not abundant in any adult tissue, but was highest in pituitary, cervix, and muscle (33). Immunohistochemistry of tissue microarrays were positive for KLK4 in healthy adult kidney, liver, and prostate tissue, but negative for colon, lung, skin or skeletal muscle (34). The results of these surveys depended upon the specificity of the Klk4 antibodies employed, and none of the studies compared KLK4 expression to levels in developing teeth. Human KLK4 expression was also surveyed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which showed highest expression in prostate and low, but detectable levels in adrenal, salivary and thyroid glandular tissues (35). In prostate, KLK4 has been proposed to be the enzyme that activates prostate specific antigen (PSA) (36, 37), but recent evidence suggests KLK2 activates PSA (38).

We developed a gene-targeted mouse strain that has a lacZ reporter gene with a mouse nuclear localization signal (NLS-ßgal) inserted at the natural Klk4 translation initiation site, which is able to assay Klk4 expression using ß-galactosidase histochemistry (28). We have used these Klk4 knockout/lacZ knockin mice to assay for Klk4 expression in developing teeth, adult prostate, liver, kidneys, submandibular salivary glands, prostate, ovaries, testis, vas deferens and epididymis.

Materials and methods

Breeding and genotyping

Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice were mated with Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice. Genotyping was by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using genomic DNA obtained by tail biopsy (28). To detect wild-type Klk4, we used PCR primers that annealed to intron 3 and exon 5 (5′-AACCTAAGGGACAGGGCAGT and 5′-TGAGGTGGTACACAGGGTCA; 550-bp amplicon). To detect the knockin gene (Klk4lacZ), we used a PCR primer pair that annealed to the Klk4 upstream region and to the NLS-lacZ coding region (5′-TGCCTCCAACCAGATAGGTC and 5′-GACAGTATCGGCCTCAGGAA; 595-bp amplicon). The wild-type mice were strain C57BL/6.

Tissue processing for histochemistry

Mice (1-yr-old) were anesthetized with isoflurane and fixed by cardiac perfusion. Blood was cleared from the vasculature using lactated ringer’s solution (30-45 s) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 135 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM Na2H2PO4; pH 7.3) for 20 min. Following perfusion, the liver, kidneys, submandibular salivary glands, prostate, ovaries, testis, vas deferens and epididymis were dissected, immersed in paraformaldehyde fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in PBS; pH 7.3) for 2-3 h at 4 °C, and washed in PBS 4-5 times (every 0.5-1 h) with one overnight wash at 4 °C. The tissues were immersed in 15% sucrose (1-2 h) followed by 30% sucrose (3-4 h) at 4 °C for cryoprotection, embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) media and stored at −80 °C. The blocks were cryosectioned at 8 μm at −20 to −22 °C on a Leica cryostat. Slides were stored at −80 °C until staining.

Processing of dental tissues for histochemistry

Day 5, 6, 7, 8, and 14 mouse heads were quickly dissected of skin, cut in half, and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde fixative overnight at 4 °C, washed in PBS 4 to 5 times (every 0.5–1 h) at 4 °C, and decalcified at 4 °C by immersion in 1 L of 4.13% disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; pH 7.3) with agitation. The EDTA solution was changed every other day for 8 to 9 d for day 5 mice, 19 to 21 d for day 6, 7, and 8 mice, and for 30 d for day 14 mice. The samples were washed in PBS at 4 °C 4 to 5 times (every 0.5–1 h) followed by one overnight wash. The tissues were immersed in 15% sucrose (1-2 h) followed by 30% sucrose (3-4 h) at 4 °C for cryoprotection and then embedded in OCT and stored at −80 °C. The blocks were cryosectioned at 8 μm thickness at −20 to −22 °C on a Leica cryostat. Slides were stored at −80 °C until staining.

X-gal staining

Slides were removed from −80 °C and immediately treated with glutaraldehyde fixative (0.1 M 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 1.25 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5% glutaraldehyde, pH 7.3) and then washed with 0.1 M HEPES, 2 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.3) 3X for 5 min. The slides were stained with X-gal solution (0.1 M HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 2% Triton X-100, 1 mg/mL X-gal substrate; pH 8.0) for 5 h or overnight at 45 °C and then washed several times in PBS, and counterstained with 0.1% (w/v) Nuclear Fast Red, coverslipped with Aquamount, and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse TE300 inverted microscope.

Results

Klk4 expression in developing teeth

LacZ histostaining of wild-type and Klk4lacZ/lacZ maxillary first molars was carried out on sections from days 5, 6, 7, 8, and 14 (Fig. 1), which covers the period when secretory ameloblasts first transition into maturation stage ameloblasts (39). No lacZ histostaining was observed in any of the wild-type molar sections or in the day 5 Klk4lacZ/lacZ maxillary first molars. The earliest positive staining in maxillary first molars was in ameloblasts at the cusp tips (enamel-free zone) and the cusp slopes in day 6 and day 7 Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice. By day 8 positive staining had spread along the ameloblast layer nearly to the cervical margin of the developing crown. By day 14, strong positive lacZ histostaining was observed throughout the ameloblast layer. No cells besides ameloblasts were positive. Notably there was no positive staining in secretory stage ameloblasts, odontoblasts, bone, or along the developing roots. At all time points, the Klk4lacZ/lacZ maxillary first molars showed organic material (counterstained red) within the enamel layer. The wild-type maxillary first molars exhibited counterstained enamel proteins similar to that of the Klk4lacZ/lacZ maxillary first molars for days 5 through 7. By day 8 the residual enamel proteins near the cusp tips were reduced and by day 14 had disappeared. The continued presence of enamel proteins in the maturation stage enamel matrix past day 8 is due to the absence of Klk4 expression. LacZ histostaining of the day 14 Klk4lacZ/lacZ continuously growing incisor was negative for secretory stage ameloblasts and positive for maturation stage ameloblasts and some aged odontoblasts near the incisal tip of the tooth (Fig. 2).

Figure 1. Klk4 expression in day 5-14 maxillary first molars.

Figure 1

Wild-type (WT) sections from post-natal days, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 14 are shown in the left column. Comparable sections from Klk4 null mice are shown on the right column. No lacZ histostaining was observed in the wild-type sections demonstrating an absence of background staining in these sections. Klk4 (lacZ) expression was first observed at the cusp tips of day 6 and day 7 maxillary first molars. By day 14 Klk4 expression extended throughout the ameloblast layer. Note the red counterstaining of enamel proteins diminished in day 8 and was gone in day 14 wild-type enamel, but persisted in the Klk4 null mice through day 14. Key: Am, ameloblasts; E, enamel; D, dentin; Od, odontoblasts; P, pulp. Bars = 100 μm.

Figure 2. Klk4 expression in day 14 mandibular first and second molars and continuously erupting incisor.

Figure 2

A: Day 14 mandibular longitudinal section through the incisor and three molars of a Klk4lacZ/lacZ null mouse. Arrowheads indicate positions of the higher magnification views shown below. A: LacZ histostaining was observed throughout the ameloblast layer in the first and second molar and in the incisor starting approximately at the level of the mesial surface of the first molar. B-D: Positive staining for Klk4 expression in maturation stage ameloblasts. E-F: Absence of Klk4 expression in secretory stage ameloblasts. Scale bars: A, 200 μm; B-F, 50 μm.

Klk4 expression in adult salivary gland, prostate, liver, kidney, testis, ovary, ovarian duct, epididymis and vas deferens

LacZ histostaining of day 14 Klk4lacZ/lacZ maxillary first molars was carried out in parallel with the histostaining of selected non-dental tissues obtained from 1-yr-old wild-type and Klk4lacZ/lacZ mice (Fig 3). Positive lacZ nuclear histostaining was observed in the striated ducts of the submandibular salivary gland (Figs. 3C-3D) and in localized areas of prostate epithelia (Figs. 3F-3H). Nuclear staining was stronger in the salivary gland than in the prostate and clearly above background. Localized endogenous lacZ staining (background) was evident in prostate epithelia in wild-type mice when the incubation was allowed to run overnight (Supporting Fig. S1). Nuclei in adult liver (Figs. 4A-C), kidney (Figs. 4D-F), testis (Figs. 4G-I), ovary (Figs. 4J,K), and ovarian duct (Figs. 4J,L) were negative. The wild-type and Klk4-null mice were also negative for these tissues in the overnight incubation (Supporting Fig. S2). Cytoplasmic lacZ histostaining was detected in the epididymis (Fig. 5A) and vas deferens (Fig. 5B), but this clearly arose from endogenous galactosidase activity, as these tissues gave the same level of staining in the same locations as wild-type controls.

Figure 3. Klk4 expression in submandibular salivary gland and prostate.

Figure 3

A-B: Wild-type submandibular salivary gland shows no endogenous (background) staining for lacZ in 5 h incubations. C-D: Intralobular (striated) duct cells show positive nuclei for Klk4 expression in the Klk4lacZ/lacZ null mouse. E: Day 14 maxillary molars histostained along with non-dental tissues as a positive control. F-H: Prostate epithelia showed small patches of weakly positive nuclei indicative of Klk4 expression. Scale bars: A/C/E/G, 200 μm; B/D/F, 50 μm; H, 50 μm.

Figure 4. Lack of Klk4 expression (no nuclear staining) in liver, kidney, testis, ovary, and oviduct.

Figure 4

Wild-type sections for these tissues were negative (data not shown). All panels are from Klk4lacZ/lacZ null mice. A-C: liver; D-F: kidney; G-I: testis: J-K: ovary; L: oviduct. Bars on left: 200 μm; middle: 100 μm; right: 50 μm.

Figure 5. Lack of Klk4 expression (no nuclear staining) in epididymis and vas deferens.

Figure 5

Positive lacZ staining was observed in the epididymis and vas deferens but in cytoplasm rather than nuclei and at similar locations in Klk4lacZ/lacZ null and wild-type mice. A: Strong endogenous lacZ staining was observed in epithelial tissues in the head of the epididymis (left) whereas the tail of the epididymis (right) was more weakly stained. Bars: top row = 200 μm; second row = 50 μm. B: Weak endogenous lacZ staining in epithelium of the vas deferens. Bars: left pair = 100 μm; right pair = 50 μm.

Discussion

This is the first survey that compares Klk4 expression in developing teeth to that of healthy adult tissues. We confirmed the results of previous in situ hybridization studies that showed Klk4 is expressed by transition and maturation stage ameloblasts (22-25). Klk4 expression by maturation ameloblasts was far stronger than that of any of the soft tissues examined. We focused on healthy adult tissues, as all previous reports of non-dental Klk4 expression (excluding cancers) were from adults and some organs, such as prostate and ovaries, develop late and are best examined in adults. In the adult organs surveyed, the striated ducts of the submandibular salivary gland and small patches of prostate epithelia were the only sites that showed unambiguous Klk4 expression. No Klk4 expression at all could be detected in kidney, testis, ovary, ovarian duct, epididymis and vas deferens. There were no obvious morphological abnormalities in the non-dental tissues examined in the Klk4 null mice, suggesting that their normal development is not Klk4 dependent.

Our findings of only trace Klk4 expression in mouse non-dental tissues may appear to conflict with the results of human studies, but this is not necessarily the case. Human studies cannot include developing teeth as a reference. KLK4 expression in prostate is highly elevated relative to other tissues, which is consistent with our findings—if developing teeth and submandibular salivary glands are not tested. The frequency of occurrence of expressed sequence tags (EST) is one way to assess levels of protein expression in various tissues. The human expressed sequence tag (EST) profile for KLK4 (Hs.218366), which does not include developing teeth, lists only 24 KLK4 transcripts out of 189,345 characterized from healthy prostate, and only 6 additional KLK4 transcripts out of the more than 4 million characterized from all other tissues combined. By comparison, the EST profile for prostate specific antigen (KLK3; Hs.171995) lists 1095 transcripts from prostate and 307 from other tissues, and the EST profile for KLK2 (Hs.515560), the enzyme thought to activate PSA, lists 578 transcript from prostate and 44 from other tissues.

Even though the number of KLK4 mRNA transcripts in non-dental tissues is very low, polymerase chain reaction methods are able to amplify them and give the impression of positive KLK4 expression. Normal human ovaries were positive for KLK4 expression when assayed by RT-PCR, but negative by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (40). Prostate was positive for KLK4 by RT-PCR, but the KLK4 protein was barely detected in prostate extracts (10−4 times the PSA concentration) and in seminal plasma (10−6 times the PSA concentration and 10−4 times the KLK2 concentration) (41). Our findings of only trace Klk4 expression in mouse prostate are consistent with the low occurrence of KLK4 transcripts in the human EST database and the trace levels of KLK4 protein detected in prostate extracts and seminal plasma.

The low expression of Klk4 in mouse submandibular ducts is potentially interesting. The short-tailed shrew is the only poisonous mammal in North America. Its toxin (blarinasin; BLTX) is a glycosylated kallikrein-like serine protease (most closely related to KLK1) that is secreted into the saliva by the submandibular salivary gland (42, 43). A role for Klk4 in innate immunity, either directly or by processing salivary proteins like histatins, is easy to imagine. However, lacZ histostaining shows only low Klk4 expression and no KLK4 ESTs were found among the 20,155 sequenced from salivary glands.

Klk4 is able to activate protease activated receptors (PARs), particularly PAR1 and PAR2 (44, 45), which are G-protein coupled receptors. Cleavage within the extracellular amino-terminus exposes a tethered ligand domain, which binds to and activates the receptor to initiate multiple signaling cascades. Despite this irreversible mechanism of activation, signaling by PARs is efficiently terminated by receptor desensitization (receptor phosphorylation and uncoupling from G proteins) and downregulation (receptor degradation by cell-surface and lysosomal proteases) (46). While PAR-mediated signaling may not be a part of the normal Klk4 physiological activity, aberrantly expressed KLK4 is able to signal via aberrantly expressed PAR1 in colon tumorigenesis (47). The expression of protease activated receptors (PAR1 through PAR4) in developing teeth has never been explored.

In this study we found that mouse Klk4 expression is vastly higher in maturation stage ameloblasts than any of the adult tissues examined. As the number of KLK4 transcripts listed in the human and mouse EST databases is very low, all current evidence supports the conclusion that Klk4 expression is predominantly enamel-specific. As enamel malformations are the only phenotype detected in persons with both KLK4 alleles mutated and in Klk4 null mice, current evidence also supports the conclusion Klk4 functions as a tooth-specific protease.

Supplementary Material

Supp Fig S1-S2

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported by USPHS Research Grant DE019775 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 29892.

Footnotes

All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Supporting information Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Fig. S1: Overnight lacZ histostaining of wild-type and Klk4lacZ/lacZ null mouse tissues.

Fig. S2: Lack of Klk4 expression in liver, kidney, testis, ovary, and oviduct with overnight incubation.

References

  • 1.Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J, Simmer JP. The structural biology of the developing dental enamel matrix. J Struct Biol. 1999;126:270–299. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1999.4130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith CE, Pompura JR, Borenstein S, Fazel A, Nanci A. Degradation and loss of matrix proteins from developing enamel. Anat Rec. 1989;224:292–316. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092240219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uchida T, Tanabe T, Fukae M, Shimizu M, Yamada M, Miake K, Kobayashi S. Immunochemical and immunohistochemical studies, using antisera against porcine 25 kDa amelogenin, 89 kDa enamelin and the 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins, on immature enamel of the pig and rat. Histochem. 1991;96:129–138. doi: 10.1007/BF00315983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fukae M, Tanabe T, Uchida T, Yamakoshi Y, Shimizu M. Enamelins in the newly formed bovine enamel. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;53:257–261. doi: 10.1007/BF01320911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fincham AG, Belcourt AB, Termine JD, Butler WT, Cothran WC. Dental enamel matrix: sequences of two amelogenin polypeptides. Biosci Rep. 1981;1:771–778. doi: 10.1007/BF01114799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J. Amelogenin post-translational modifications: carboxy-terminal processing and the phosphorylation of bovine and porcine “TRAP” and “LRAP” amelogenins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197:248–255. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yamakoshi Y, Tanabe T, Fukae M, Shimizu M. Porcine amelogenins. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;54:69–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00316293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J. Comparative mass spectrometric analyses of enamel matrix proteins from five species suggest a common pathway of post-secretory proteolytic processing. Connect Tissue Res. 1996;35:151–156. doi: 10.3109/03008209609029186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamakoshi Y, Hu JC-C, Ryu OH, Tanabe T, Oida S, Fukae M, Simmer JP. A comprehensive strategy for purifying pig enamel proteins. In: Kobayashi I, Ozawa H, editors. Biomineralization: formation, diversity, evolution and application Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Biomineralization; Niigata, Jpn. Sept 25-28, 2001; Hadano, Japan: Tokai University Press; 2003. pp. 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Begue-Kirn C, Krebsbach PH, Bartlett JD, Butler WT. Dentin sialoprotein, dentin phosphoprotein, enamelysin and ameloblastin: tooth-specific molecules that are distinctively expressed during murine dental differentiation. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:963–970. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ryu OH, Fincham AG, Hu CC, Zhang C, Qian Q, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Characterization of recombinant pig enamelysin activity and cleavage of recombinant pig and mouse amelogenins. J Dent Res. 1999;78:743–750. doi: 10.1177/00220345990780030601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nagano T, Kakegawa A, Yamakoshi Y, Tsuchiya S, Hu JC, Gomi K, Arai T, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Mmp-20 and Klk4 cleavage site preferences for amelogenin sequences. J Dent Res. 2009;88:823–828. doi: 10.1177/0022034509342694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iwata T, Yamakoshi Y, Hu JC, Ishikawa I, Bartlett JD, Krebsbach PH, Simmer JP. Processing of ameloblastin by MMP-20. J Dent Res. 2007;86:153–157. doi: 10.1177/154405910708600209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chun YH, Yamakoshi Y, Yamakoshi F, Fukae M, Hu JC, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Cleavage Site Specificity of MMP-20 for Secretory-stage Ameloblastin. J Dent Res. 2010;89:785–790. doi: 10.1177/0022034510366903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caterina JJ, Skobe Z, Shi J, Ding Y, Simmer JP, Birkedal-Hansen H, Bartlett JD. Enamelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 20)-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:49598–49604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim JW, Simmer JP, Hart TC, Hart PS, Ramaswami MD, Bartlett JD, Hu JC. MMP-20 mutation in autosomal recessive pigmented hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. 2005;42:271–275. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Papagerakis P, Lin HK, Lee KY, Hu Y, Simmer JP, Bartlett JD, Hu JC. Premature stop codon in MMP20 causing amelogenesis imperfecta. J Dent Res. 2008;87:56–59. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ozdemir D, Hart PS, Ryu OH, Choi SJ, Ozdemir-Karatas M, Firatli E, Piesco N, Hart TC. MMP20 active-site mutation in hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J Dent Res. 2005;84:1031–1035. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee SK, Seymen F, Kang HY, Lee KE, Gencay K, Tuna B, Kim JW. MMP20 Hemopexin Domain Mutation in Amelogenesis Imperfecta. J Dent Res. 2010;89:46–50. doi: 10.1177/0022034509352844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smith CE. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9:128–161. doi: 10.1177/10454411980090020101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simmer JP, Papagerakis P, Smith CE, Fisher DC, Rountrey AN, Zheng L, Hu JC. Regulation of dental enamel shape and hardness. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1024–1038. doi: 10.1177/0022034510375829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hu JC, Ryu OH, Chen JJ, Uchida T, Wakida K, Murakami C, Jiang H, Qian Q, Zhang C, Ottmers V, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Localization of EMSP1 expression during tooth formation and cloning of mouse cDNA. J Dent Res. 2000;79:70–76. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790011301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hu JC, Zhang C, Sun X, Yang Y, Cao X, Ryu O, Simmer JP. Characterization of the mouse and human PRSS17 genes, their relationship to other serine proteases, and the expression of PRSS17 in developing mouse incisors. Gene. 2000;251:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00203-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hu JC, Sun X, Zhang C, Liu S, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Enamelysin and kallikrein-4 mRNA expression in developing mouse molars. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:307–315. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simmer JP, Sun X, Yamada Y, Zhang CH, Bartlett JD, Hu JC-C. Enamelysin and kallikrein-4 expression in the mouse incisor. In: Kobayashi I, Ozawa H, editors. Biomineralization: formation, diversity, evolution and application Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Biomineralization; Niigata, Jpn. Sept 25-28, 2001; Hadano, Japan: Tokai University Press; 2004. pp. 348–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ryu O, Hu JC, Yamakoshi Y, Villemain JL, Cao X, Zhang C, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Porcine kallikrein-4 activation, glycosylation, activity, and expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:358–365. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith CE, Richardson AS, Hu Y, Bartlett JD, Hu JC-C, Simmer JP. Effects of loss of function of kallikrein 4 on mineralization of enamel: comparison to mice lacking matrix metalloproteinase 20. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(20):18149–18160. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.194258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Simmer JP, Hu Y, Lertlam R, Yamakoshi Y, Hu JC. Hypomaturation enamel defects in Klk4 knockout/LacZ knockin mice. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:19110–19121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hart PS, Hart TC, Michalec MD, Ryu OH, Simmons D, Hong S, Wright JT. Mutation in kallikrein 4 causes autosomal recessive hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. 2004;41:545–549. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.017657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu Y, Papagerakis P, Yamakoshi Y, Hu JC, Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Functions of KLK4 and MMP-20 in dental enamel formation. Biol Chem. 2008;389:695–700. doi: 10.1515/BC.2008.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Cheng J, Springer MS. Pseudogenization of the tooth gene enamelysin (MMP20) in the common ancestor of extant baleen whales. Proc Biol Sci. 2010:22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Obiezu CV, Shan SJ, Soosaipillai A, Luo LY, Grass L, Sotiropoulou G, Petraki CD, Papanastasiou PA, Leesque MA, Diamandis EP. Human kallikrein 4: quantitative study in tissues and evidence for Its secretion into biological fluids. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1432–1442. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.049692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shaw JL, Diamandis EP. Distribution of 15 human kallikreins in tissues and biological fluids. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1423–1432. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Seiz L, Kotzsch M, Grebenchtchikov NI, Geurts-Moespot AJ, Fuessel S, Goettig P, Gkazepis A, Wirth MP, Schmitt M, Lossnitzer A, Sweep FC, Magdolen V. Polyclonal antibodies against kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4): immunohistochemical assessment of KLK4 expression in healthy tissues and prostate cancer. Biol. 2010;391:391–401. doi: 10.1515/BC.2010.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Day CH, Fanger GR, Retter MW, Hylander BL, Penetrante RB, Houghton RL, Zhang X, Mcneill PD, Filho AM, Nolasco M, Badaro R, Cheever MA, Reed SG, Dillon DC, Watanabe Y. Characterization of KLK4 expression and detection of KLK4-specific antibody in prostate cancer patient sera. Oncogene. 2002;21:7114–7120. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nelson PS, Gan L, Ferguson C, Moss P, Gelinas R, Hood L, Wang K. Molecular cloning and characterization of prostase, an androgen-regulated serine protease with prostate-restricted expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3114–3119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Takayama TK, Mcmullen BA, Nelson PS, Matsumura M, Fujikawa K. Characterization of hK4 (prostase), a prostate-specific serine protease: activation of the precursor of prostate specific antigen (pro-PSA) and single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator and degradation of prostatic acid phosphatase. Biochemistry. 2001;40:15341–15348. doi: 10.1021/bi015775e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williams SA, Xu Y, De Marzo AM, Isaacs JT, Denmeade SR. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is activated by KLK2 in prostate cancer ex vivo models and in prostate-targeted PSA/KLK2 double transgenic mice. Prostate. 2010;70:788–796. doi: 10.1002/pros.21111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hu JC, Sun X, Zhang C, Simmer JP. A comparison of enamelin and amelogenin expression in developing mouse molars. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:125–132. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dong Y, Kaushal A, Bui L, Chu S, Fuller PJ, Nicklin J, Samaratunga H, Clements JA. Human kallikrein 4 (KLK4) is highly expressed in serous ovarian carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:2363–2371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Obiezu CV, Soosaipillai A, Jung K, Stephan C, Scorilas A, Howarth DH, Diamandis EP. Detection of human kallikrein 4 in healthy and cancerous prostatic tissues by immunofluorometry and immunohistochemistry. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1232–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kita M, Okumura Y, Ohdachi SD, Oba Y, Yoshikuni M, Nakamura Y, Kido H, Uemura D. Purification and characterisation of blarinasin, a new tissue kallikrein-like protease from the short-tailed shrew Blarina brevicauda: comparative studies with blarina toxin. Biol Chem. 2005;386:177–182. doi: 10.1515/BC.2005.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aminetzach YT, Srouji JR, Kong CY, Hoekstra HE. Convergent evolution of novel protein function in shrew and lizard venom. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1925–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ramsay AJ, Dong Y, Hunt ML, Lnn M, Samaratunga H, Clements JA, Hooper JD. Kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4) initiates intracellular signaling via protease-activated receptors (PARs). KLK4 and PAR-2 are co-expressed during prostate cancer progression. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12293–12304. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709493200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mize GJ, Wang W, Takayama TK. Prostate-specific kallikreins-2 and -4 enhance the proliferation of DU-145 prostate cancer cells through protease-activated receptors-1 and -2. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1043–151. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ossovskaya VS, Bunnett NW. Protease-activated receptors: contribution to physiology and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:579–621. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gratio V, Beaufort N, Seiz L, Maier J, Virca GD, Debela M, Grebenchtchikov N, Magdolen V, Darmoul D. Kallikrein-related peptidase 4: a new activator of the aberrantly expressed protease-activated receptor 1 in colon cancer cells. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1452–1461. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Fig S1-S2

RESOURCES