CONSPECTUS

Since the widespread use of exogenous lung surfactant to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, premature infant survival and respiratory morbidity have dramatically improved. Despite the effectiveness of the animal-derived surfactant preparations, there still remain some concerns and difficulties associated with their use. This has prompted investigation into the creation of synthetic surfactant preparations. However, to date, no clinically used synthetic formulation is as effective as the natural material. This is largely because the previous synthetic formulations lacked analogues of the hydrophobic proteins of the lung surfactant system, SP-B and SP-C, which are critical functional constituents. As a result, recent investigation has turned towards the development of a new generation of synthetic, biomimetic surfactants that contain synthetic phospholipids along with a mimic of the hydrophobic protein portion of lung surfactant.
In this Account, we detail our efforts in creating accurate mimics of SP-C for use in a synthetic surfactant replacement therapy. Despite SP-C’s seemingly simple structure, the predominantly helical protein is extraordinarily challenging to work with given its extreme hydrophobicity and structural instability, which greatly complicates the creation of an effective SP-C analogue.
Drawing inspiration from Nature, two promising biomimetic approaches have led to the creation of rationally designed biopolymers that recapitulate many of SP-C’s molecular features. The first approach utilizes detailed SP-C structure-activity relationships and amino acid folding propensities to create a peptide-based analogue, SP-C33. In SP-C33, the problematic and metastable poly-valine helix is replaced with a structurally stable, poly-leucine helix and includes a well placed positive charge to prevent aggregation. SP-C33 is both structurally stable and eliminates the association propensity of the native protein. The second approach follows the same design considerations, but makes use of a non-natural, poly-N-substituted glycine or “peptoid” scaffold to circumvent the difficulties associated with SP-C. By incorporating unique, biomimetic side chains in a non-natural backbone, the peptoid mimic captures both SP-C’s hydrophobic patterning and helical secondary structure.
Despite the differences in structure, both SP-C33 and the SP-C peptoid mimic capture many requisite features of SP-C. In a surfactant environment, these analogues also replicate many of the key surface activities necessary for a functional biomimetic surfactant therapy while overcoming the difficulties associated with the natural protein. With improved stability, greater production potential, and elimination of possible pathogenic contamination, these biomimetic surfactant formulations offer the potential not only to improve the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome, but also the opportunity to treat other respiratory-related disorders.
INTRODUCTION
Despite the seemingly simple building blocks from which they are constructed, proteins constitute enormously complex and powerful molecular tools. Utilizing a bottom-up design approach, Nature has engineered proteins to perform a wide range of life-essential tasks that participate in almost every biological process. Proteins are able to carry out such diverse functions because they adopt specific, compact conformations with high precision and fidelity, allowing exact, three-dimensional positioning of the functional groups and facilitating the necessary interactions of the active site.
The diverse and precise bioactivities of proteins have made them coveted therapeutic agentsand are currently being used to in a variety of applications including in the treatment of diabetes, cancer, and to combat infection. Because of their size, peptides have several advantages over small molecules and antibodies for therapeutic applications. Therapeutic peptides are large enough (10–50 AA) that their interaction with desired targets are more specific with lower toxicity profiles than other small molecules. Likewise, peptides are small enough to have improved storage/stability, tissue penetration, and immunogenicity over antibody-based therapeutics. Despite this, peptide-based therapeutics are only recently seeing wider spread use, largely, because peptides are generally more difficult than small molecules to produce on a large scale, are rapidly cleared in vivo, and lack in vivo stability due to protease degradation1.
To date, the vast majority of engineered synthetic and recombinant peptide therapeutics are based upon sequences originating from natural sources, as these peptides have undergone natural selection for both efficacy and stability1. Recent advances in genomics and structural proteomics have led to a deeper understanding of how a protein’s amino acid sequence lends itself to the formation of stable, secondary structural elements such as α-helices, β-sheets, and turns; and how these structural elements give rise to tertiary and quaternary structures of folded, biologically active proteins. This improvement in translating amino acid sequences into protein structures and related functions, while not complete and still developing, has led to the ability to prepare some peptide sequences de novo with predictable structures2. In addition, researchers are also expanding Nature’s code with the inclusion of non-natural amino acids and, in some cases, using totally synthetic polymeric scaffolds, or “foldamers.3” These novel structures are beginning to become increasingly efficacious and have the possibility to possess improved properties over native peptides, increasing the tools available to the protein scientist.
Researchers have developed novel sequences of amino acids, non-natural polymers, and hybrids of the two that can be efficiently produced with improved stability, bioavailability, and, in some instances, improved functionality in comparison to the mimicked peptide. One interesting application with clinical relevance concerns the mimicry of the predominantly helical, hydrophobic protein of the lung surfactant (LS) system, surfactant protein C (SP-C). SP-C, in addition to SP-B, is an important constituent of exogenous LS material for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, working with the natural protein and sequence-identical analogues is extremely challenging due SP-C’s extreme hydrophobicity and metastable secondary structure4. These attributes make the isolation and storage of SP-C very difficult and may also contribute to the limited shelf-life of therapeutic preparations containing the protein5. The utilization of recombinant and synthetic peptides as well as non-natural, peptidomimetic approaches offer promise for overcoming these difficulties. Below, the requisite surface activities of a functional LS formulation and the key SP-C structural and molecular features are detailed followed by the ongoing approaches to mimic this difficult protein.
LUNG SURFACTANT AND RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME
LS is a complex mixture of over 50 lipid species and four surfactant proteins, which lines the alveolar air-liquid interface and is required for proper respiration, as its absence or dysfunction leads to severe respiratory disease6,7. No single component is solely responsible for LS’s unique biophysical activity7,8. Phospholipids are the main constituent of LS, representing > 80% of its mass, while neutral lipids and surfactant proteins each constitute approximately 10%8,9. In the airways, the lipid-protein mixture has three main properties that are essential for respiration: 1) rapid adsorption to the air-liquid interface of the alveoli,2) upon compression or exhalation, LS must dramatically reduce the alveolar surface tension to near-zero values, preventing collapse of the alveoli due to contractile forces of the alveolar liquid lining, and 3) rapidly respread to the air-liquid interface upon expansion or inhalation, reducing maximum surface tension and diminishing the work of breathing10.
An absence of functional LS in premature infants leads to the occurrence of neonatal RDS (nRDS). Without properly functioning LS, lung compliance is reduced and respiration is greatly impaired, ultimately resulting in alveolar collapse and suffocation without treatment. While nRDS was once a leading cause of infant mortality, it is now routinely treated by administration of animal-derived exogenous surfactant preparations into the lungs of afflicted individuals7. These surfactant replacement therapies (SRTs) consist of modified mammalian surfactant either extracted directly from animal lungs by lavage or isolated from homogenized lung tissue. Despite the efficacy of natural SRTs, there are some drawbacks associated with their use11. The natural preparations present a possibility of cross-species transfer of infectious agents as well as high production costs and batch-to-batch variability. In addition, SRTs may also be beneficial in the treatment of other respiratory-related disorders such as acute RDS; however, this requires significantly more material than current isolation techniques can supply12. To address these concerns, synthetic surfactants composed of synthetic phospholipids and surface-active chemical additives were developed. However, these synthetic preparations had reduced efficacies compared to natural surfactants and are no longer used, likely, a result of the absence of the hydrophobic LS proteins, SP-B and SP-C, which are both critical constituents of functional LS13,14. Therefore, there has been increasing interest in the development of a third category of SRTs: biomimetic SRTs that utilize an entirely synthetic surfactant containing a mimic of the hydrophobic protein portion of LS, which functions as well as the natural material and eliminates the concerns associated with animal-derived surfactants12,15. This endeavor requires a detailed understanding of the molecular interactions between the hydrophobic surfactant proteins and the LS phospholipids and how these interactions relate to surface activity16.
SURFACTANT PROTEIN C
Both SP-B and SP-C are key functional constituents of LS and are included in exogenous SRTs for the treatment of nRDS13,16. SP-B catalyzes the transport of surfactant to the air-liquid interface and assists in the folding and respreading of surfactant material during the respiration cycle. While many of SP-C’s biophysical properties overlap with those of SP-B, SP-C is ubiquitously expressed in all mammals and other non-mammalian species that breathe air via alveolar-like lung structures and lacks sequence homology to any other known protein16. These observations suggest that SP-C’s role in LS is both unique and necessary in addition to SP-B.
SP-C is synthesized in the airways by the alveolar type II cells and is secreted as a final 35 AA surface-active lipopeptide. The mature protein contains a high number of valine, leucine, and isoleucine residues as well as a dipalmitoylation modification near the N-terminus (Chart 1). The abundant hydrophobic residues, along with the palmitoyl motif, make SP-C one of the most hydrophobic proteins known to exist in any biological system7. SP-C’s unique sequence is highly conserved amongst all species expressing the protein17.
Chart 1.
Structure of native SP-C and SP-C analogues. The chart shows how two classes of SP-C analogues utilize different techniques to mimic the various conserved regions. Colored residues signify the different conserved regions of SP-C: residues in the flexible N-terminal region of SP-C are blue, the basic residues are red, and the hydrophobic, helical region is in green.
The three-dimensional structure of SP-C in an apolar solvent has been determined by 2D-NMR and was found to lack any tertiary structure while its secondary structure is dominated by a large α-helical region encompassing residues 9 to 3418. The length of this helical region, 37 Å, matches that of a fluid DPPC bilayer and within this region resides a 23 Å-long, valyl-rich stretch of hydrophobic amino acids that also closely matches the alkyl chain length of a DPPC bilayer. The unstructured N-terminal region of the mature peptide was found to assume a flexible disordered orientation in solution, but more recent studies have suggested that this segment adopts an amphipathic conformation in the presence of phospholipid monolayers and membranes19,20.
SP-C’s unique molecular characteristics make it ideally suited for interacting with LS phospholipids7. Strong hydrophobic forces and the lack of charged or bulky side-chains cause SP-C’s helical region to associate and interact with the interior of phospholipid acyl chains. In a DPPC monolayer, SP-C orientates at a 70° tilt relative to the interfacial plane and orients nearly parallel with the lipid acyl chains within a bilayer, maximizing interactions between the poly-valyl helix and the acyl chains21,22. The two positively charged residues, lysine and arginine, also promote binding to a phospholipid monolayer or bilayer through ionic interactions between the basic residues and the head groups of the anionic phospholipids23. The exact function of the palmitoylated cysteines is not completely known, but they appear also to contribute to SP-C’s association with phospholipids, as well as in the possible maintenance of its helical structure22,24–26. A depiction of SP-C’s believed disposition in a surfactant film is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hypothesized SP-C disposition in a LS film at the alveolar air-liquid interface. In a monolayer film, the SP-C helix is oriented nearly parallel to the air-liquid interface, while in a phospholipid bilayer, the SP-C helix aligns nearly parallel with the lipid acyl chains. The figure also shows how the palmitoyl chains of SP-C may act to anchor either the flexible N-terminal region in the same phospholipid film or to an adjacent layer, forming a surface-associated surfactant reservoir.
While only a minor component of LS, ~ 1% (w/w), SP-C has a substantial effect on the surface activity of the LS phospholipids. The addition of SP-C to surfactant phospholipids dispersed in an aqueous subphase accelerates the adsorption and transfer of surfactant phospholipids from the subphase, rapidly forming a surfactant layer at the interface27. SP-C also promotes further binding of dispersed lipid vesicles to the newly formed surfactant layer, creating a surface-associated surfactant reservoir26.
Once at the air-liquid interface, SP-C acts as a molecular lever and hydrophobic lipid anchor during respiration21. Upon exhalation, the LS film is compressed causing a reduction of surface tension. This compression leads to the exclusion of some material from the interface, resulting in the formation of bilayer and multilayered structures of surfactant that remain associated with the interface28. This multilayer formation is significantly enhanced by the presence of the hydrophobic SP-C protein28. Figure 1 depicts how SP-C may facilitate the formation of three dimensional surfactant structures. As the film is compressed, SP-C’s helical region reorients, aligning its helix with the lipid acyl chains29. At the same time, a number of lipid molecules are also drawn out of the monolayer surface and inverted to form a retained local bilayer structure30. SP-C’s helix as well as the palmitoylated cysteines are thought to assist in surfactant retainment, whereby the palmitoyl groups remain associated with the compressed surface film while the helix is anchored with the excluded phospholipids30,31. This surfactant reservoir could then readily be inserted upon expansion or inhalation. The SP-C-specific catalyzed multilayered structures are also believed to be responsible for SP-C’s regulation of surfactant viscosity, which prevents surfactant outflow from the alveoli to the upper airways at very low surface tensions32.
Despite SP-C’s many important biophysical properties, working with and studying the native protein is quite difficult as SP-C’s poly-valyl helix is discordant, i.e. it is composed of amino acids with a high propensity to form β-strands4. The SP-C helix is consequently metastable in solution and can spontaneously convert into β-sheet aggregates and amyloid fibrils that have inferior surface activity compared to the correctly folded, helical protein33–35. The instabilities of SP-C pose serious challenges either in isolating the native protein or the creation of synthetic analogues that retain the SP-C’s requisite α-helical structure and corresponding surface activity. As a result, researchers have employed a variety of unique strategies to overcome these problems by producing and mimicking SP-C in heterologous systems, synthetic peptide synthesis, and non-natural peptidomimetic materials.
SYNTHETIC SP-C ANALOGUES
The high degree of SP-C sequence conservation and uniqueness suggests the main molecular and structural features of SP-C must be preserved to retain the full repertoire of SP-C-related functionality17. These features include SP-C’s extreme hydrophobicity, its helical secondary structure, the flexible N-terminal region, and the two basic, charged residues. The palmitoylation motif has also been shown to have significant in vitro functionality; however, the in vivo importance of this motif has yet to be definitively proven19,20,31. In addition, the resulting analogues must resist misfolding and degradation over time and be amendable to efficient, larger-scale production.
Recombinant SP-C Analogues
The expression of SP-C in heterologous systems allows for more efficient, large-scale production of the troublesome protein than isolation of the native protein with the ability to introduce designed sequence variations, improving handling and efficacy36–38. A form of recombinant SP-C (rSP-C) is currently used in the Venticute39. This rSP-C analogue from Nycomed shares a nearly identical sequence with human SP-C except that the palmitoylated cysteines are absent and have been replaced with phenylalanines to eliminate protein oligomerization38. The phenylalanine substitution makes this protein analogue similar to canine SP-C, which contains one phenylalanine at position 6 and preserves, to some extent, the hydrophobicity of the palmitoyl groups. The addition of palmitoyl chains in a similar analogue did not enhance in vivo efficacy of the rSP-C-based formulation36.
rSP-C has shown good efficacy, improving lung function in premature animal models of RDS38. In clinical trials for the treatment of ARDS resulting from both indirect and direct lung injury, Venticute has shown a positive effect on gas exchange, but, ultimately, did not have a beneficial effect on long-term survival39. However, a post-hoc analysis suggested that Venticute may have survival benefits in patients with direct lung injury. As a result, Venticute is currently being used in a Phase III clinical trial for the reduction of mortality in patients with RDS resulting only from severe acute pneumonia or aspiration of gastric contents (NCT00074906). The forthcoming results of this study are highly anticipated by clinicians and researchers of the LS community.
Synthetic SP-C Peptide Analogues
SP-C’s lack of a tertiary structure and relatively simple secondary structure make it feasible to mimic the native protein by synthetic peptides. This is especially enticing given the difficulties associated with isolation, purification, and storage of the native protein from natural or recombinant sources. Utilizing structural and biophysical information gained from the native protein, synthetic SP-C analogues have been created to mimic the key lipid-interaction domains5,10,40,41. These synthetically engineered peptides not only address some of the inherent difficulties associated with SP-C, but also facilitate the production of sufficient quantities for use in a synthetic SRT. In fact, many of these polypeptide biomimetics have been found to have comparable in vitro activity as the native protein as well as favorable in vivo performance in animal models. However, the metastability of the helical region still remains a challenging problem in sequences that retain the poly-valyl helix.
To address the metastability of the poly-valyl helix, a novel series of valine-to-leucine substituted SP-C analogues have been created40,42,43. One of the first was SP-C(Leu), which is a non-acylated SP-C variant based upon the sequence of human SP-C, but replaces the valine residues in the α-helical region with leucine residues and the palmitoylated cysteines with serines40. The substitution of the β-sheet-promoting valine residues with the α-helix promoting leucines of SP-C(Leu) results in an analogue that spontaneously forms an α-helical structure in solution, even after acid treatment, which can be produced efficiently on a large scale. When combined with a phospholipid formulation, SP-C(Leu) adopted a transbilayer orientation and showed favorable in vitro surfactant spreading properties, similar to the native protein, reducing both minimum and maximum surface tensions during dynamic cycling. However, in an animal model of nRDS, the biomimetic formulation offered only a modest improvement in lung function40. This was due to unwanted oligomerization of the poly-leucine helix at high concentrations, caused by leucine zipper-like association.
To circumvent this problem, SP-C(LKS) was created in which three evenly spaced leucine residues in the helical region were replaced with lysine residues43. The location of the positive charges around the helical circumference prevented self-association and when combined with phospholipids, exhibited rapid adsorption and favorable modulation of surface tension during dynamic cycling43. However, SP-C(LKS) was unable to produce sufficient improvement of lung function in vivo. The reason for the poor in vivo performance is not well understood, but the introduction of the positively charged lysine residues in the nonpolar, helix may either disrupt the region’s hydrophobic interaction with the lipids or the SP-C dipole moment42.
The latest generation of the leucine-based synthetic peptide analogues, SP-C33, utilizes specific design features from both SP-C(Leu) and SP-C(LKS) to overcome the solubility and aggregation problems of SP-C(Leu) with improved in vivo performance relative to SP-C(LKS)42. SP-C33 is similar to the other valine to leucine-substituted analogues, but contains an N-terminal region that is truncated by two residues to increase synthesis efficancy and, most notably, replaces Leu 14 with lysine to prevent peptide oligomerization while not disrupting the hydrophobicity of the aliphatic helix. This analogue was found to prevent oligomerization and improve the dynamic surface activity of a lipid formulation42. When used to treat premature newborn animals, a SP-C33 containing formulation was as effective in increasing inspiration volumes as a modified natural surfactant preparation that contained both SP-B and SP-C44. Surprisingly, despite the demonstrated in vitro importance of the SP-C palmitoyl groups, an acylated SP-C33 analogue did not enhance the in vivo performance42. Airway openness at end expiration was lower in animals treated with SP-C33 than those treated with a natural SRT, suggesting that other components, such as SP-B, are necessary to maintain alveolar stability13. Despite this difference, the synthetic peptide is as effective as native SP-C in improving surface properties of lipids in vitro and in vivo and represents a successful engineering approach to overcome the numerous difficulties associated with the native protein.
Peptoid Analogues
In an alternative approach to creating recombinant or synthetic peptide analogues, recent work has been aimed at the development of a new category of synthetic surfactant protein mimics utilizing poly-N-substituted glycines or “peptoids”3. Peptoids have close structural similarity to peptides, but have their side chains appended to the amide nitrogens rather than to the α-carbons. This feature renders peptoids essentially invulnerable to protease degradation, making them more biostable than peptides and reducing specific recognition by the immune system45. So far, studies have shown peptoids to induce only very low-level antibody response and, certain sequences, have been found to be bioactive, nontoxic, and nonimmunogenic46,47. Despite the achirality of the N-substituted glycine backbone and its lack of hydrogen bond donors, peptoids are able to adopt extraordinarily stable, chiral helices. When substituted with α-chiral, sterically bulky side chains, steric and, in some instances, electronic repulsion between adjacent residues cause peptoids to adopt a secondary structure similar to a polyproline type I helix with ~ 3 residues per turn and a pitch of ~ 6 Å48,49. These helical structures are extremely stable and do not appreciably denature over time as their formation does not depend on hydrogen bonding along the backbone50. Peptoids also have the added advantage of being relatively easy and cost-effective to synthesize compared to peptides3. Utilizing a solid-phase, submonomer synthesis approach (Scheme 1), peptoids up to 50 residues in length can be synthesized in high yield, with coupling efficiencies comparable to those of Fmoc peptide synthesis (> 98.5%). Efficient synthesis and the ability to form stable, helical structures make peptoids an excellent platform for mimicry of bioactive molecules that rely on helical structure for proper function, such as the hydrophobic protein, SP-C.
Scheme 1.
Submonomer synthesis scheme for peptoidoligomers.
Utilizing design strategies similar to those that were used in the design of recombinant and synthetic peptide analogues of SP-C, a variety of non-acylated, sequence-specific peptoid analogues of SP-C(5-32) have been developed51,52. The sequences of the biomimetic analogues were designed to emulate the key structural features of the native protein, with a hydrophobic, α-chiral, helical region, mimicking SP-C’s helix, and an N-terminal amphipathic, achiral region containing side chains that are largely analogous to those present in human SP-C. To gain a greater understanding of the structural requirements in peptoid-based analogues of SP-C, systematic alterations were introduced in the sequences51. Two main classes of mimics were created, containing either α-chiral, aromatic- or α-chiral, aliphatic-based helices, which contained 8, 11, and 14 residues to determine both the side chain preference and the optimal helix length for a peptoid-based mimic of SP-C. Circular dichroism spectroscopy showed that the analogues were predominantly helical in solution with the longer mimics having the highest helical propensity. In addition to being highly helical, the analogues were stable and not prone to misfolding in solution over time.
When combined with a synthetic phospholipid formulation, the peptoid-based SP-C mimics all showed improvement in surface activity over the lipid system alone; however, the mimics containing the more rigid, aromatic helix yielded superior surface activity in comparison to the more biomimetic, aliphatic-based mimics. The optimal surface activity of the SP-C mimics was also dependent on the presence of a helical region of 14 peptoid monomers in length (~ 28 Å), which is similar in length to the poly-valyl region of native SP-C (26 Å). In a lipid film, the aromatic-based mimic altered the surface pressure-area isotherms (obtained on a Langmuir-Wilhelmy surface balance) in a manner similar to a synthetic SP-C peptide. Film morphology studies revealed that the presence of the aromatic-based mimic, but not the aliphatic-based mimic, resulted in the nucleation of bright vesicle domains, likely three-dimensional structural changes in the film, at higher surface pressures, similar to SP-C. In a pulsating bubble surfactometer, the aromatic-based mimic also accelerated surfactant adsorption to the air-liquid interface as well as greatly reduced the minimum and maximum surface tensions, all of which properties were similar to the SP-C peptide.
These results were somewhat surprising, as the native protein contains only aliphatic side chains in the helical region; however, it is believed that the aromatic monomers more effectively constrain the peptoid backbone into the polyproline type I-like helical conformation because it exhibits both steric repulsions between bulky side chains and electronic repulsions between aromatic π and carbonyl lone-pair electrons48. This indicates that it is more important to capture the extreme hydrophobicity and highly helical structure of SP-C rather than its exact side chain chemistry, which is consistent with previous studies of peptide analogues53.
Taken together, peptoid-based mimics of SP-C seem very promising, since they exhibit in vitro biophysical activities highly similar to that of the SP-C peptide. It was also found that the same design considerations occurring in SP-C peptide variants are applicable in the development of peptoid-based mimics of SP-C. Therefore, the results observed seem to provide a basis for the development of a peptoid-based biomimetic, SRT for the treatment of RDS or other medical applications, and this work is ongoing.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
While current SRT formulations are highly efficacious in the treatment of nRDS, there are still drawbacks associated with their use, which has prompted researchers to devise synthetic sources of the surface-active material, specifically creating mimics of the hydrophobic surfactant proteins, SP-B and SP-C. The importance of SP-C as a functional constituent of a biomimetic SRT is evidenced not only by its inclusion in natural exogenous surfactant formulations, but also by its ubiquitous expression in mammalian airwaysand its uniqueness, lacking any known sequence homologues. However, isolation and storage of either the native SP-C protein or sequence-identical analogues is extraordinarily difficult due to its extreme hydrophobicity and metastable secondary structure. As a result, researchers have drawn inspiration from Nature in redesigning the naturally selected protein to overcome these difficulties. Utilizing detailed structural information and biophysical insight about native SP-C, coupled with protein folding preferences, investigators have created a number of novel peptide and peptoid-based analogues that mimic SP-C’s key molecular and structural motifs, but because of their side chain chemistry and/or their unique backbone structure, reduce or eliminate many of the difficulties associated with the native protein and sequence identical analogues. Utilizing synthetic approaches, it is also conceivable that future SP-C analogues may contain other non-natural, sequence modifications that further improve stability and activity in comparison to the native and recombinant species. Further improvements in biomimetic SRT efficacy will also likely involve the inclusion of a SP-B mimetic as both constituents play a critical role in surfactant homeostasis. With improved stability, greater production potential, and elimination of possible pathogenic contamination, not only do biomimetic SRTs offer the potential to improve the treatment of nRDS, but they may also see wider application in the treatment of other, more prevalent, respiratory-related disorders where greater quantities of the surface-active material are required, such as in the treatment of acute RDS.
Acknowledgments
Numerous researchers have contributed to the authors’ work in this field; notably we acknowledge Cindy Wu and Shannon Seurynck-Servoss for their pioneering efforts in developing the first generation peptoid analogues of SP-C and SP-B. We also acknowledge Mark Johnson and Ron Zuckermann. NJB acknowledges support from the NIH Biotechnology Training Program. AEB acknowledges the support of NIH/NHLBI Grant # 2 R01 HL067984.
References
- 1.Sato AK, Viswanathan M, Kent RB, Wood CR. Therapeutic peptides: technological advances driving peptides into development. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17:638–642. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science. 2003;302:1364–1368. doi: 10.1126/science.1089427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Czyzewski AM, Barron AE. Protein and peptide biomimicry: Gold-mining inspiration from nature’s ingenuity. AIChE J. 2008;54:2–8. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kallberg Y, Gustafsson M, Persson B, Thyberg J, Johansson J. Prediction of amyloid fibril-forming proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:12945–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010402200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walther FJ, Waring AJ, Sherman MA, Zasadzinski JA, Gordon LM. Hydrophobic surfactant proteins and their analogues. Neonatology. 2007;91:303–310. doi: 10.1159/000101346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Orgeig S, Bernhard W, Biswas SC, Daniels CB, Hall SB, Hetz SK, Lang CJ, Maina JN, Panda AK, Perez-Gil J, Possmayer F, Veldhuizen RA, Yan W. The anatomy, physics, and physiology of gas exchange surfaces: is there a universal function for pulmonary surfactant in animal respiratory structures? Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2007;47:610–627. doi: 10.1093/icb/icm079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Notter RH. Lung surfactants : basic science and clinical applications. Marcel Dekker; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blanco O, Perez-Gil J. Biochemical and pharmacological differences between preparations of exogenous natural surfactant used to treat Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Role of the different components in an efficient pulmonary surfactant. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;568:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Veldhuizen R, Nag K, Orgeig S, Possmayer F. The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Basis of Disease. 1998;1408:90–108. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johansson J, Curstedt T, Robertson B. Artificial surfactants based on analogues of SP-B and SP-C. Pediatric Pathology & Molecular Medicine. 2001;20:501–518. doi: 10.1080/pdp.20.6.501.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu CW, Barron AE. In: Biomimetic Materials and Design: Interactive Biointerfacial Strategies, Tissue Engineering, and Drug Delivery. Dillow AK, Lowman AM, editors. Marcel-Dekker; New York: 2002. pp. 565–633. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Curstedt T, Johansson J. New synthetic surfactant - How and when? Biol Neonate. 2006;89:336–339. doi: 10.1159/000092871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Almlen A, Stichtenoth G, Linderholm B, Haegerstrand-Bjorkman M, Robertson B, Johansson J, Curstedt T. Surfactant proteins B and C are both necessary for alveolar stability at end expiration in premature rabbits with respiratory distress syndrome. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1101–1108. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00865.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Halliday HL. Controversies: synthetic or natural surfactant. The case for natural surfactant. J Perinat Med. 1996;24:417–26. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.5.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mingarro I, Lukovic D, Vilar M, Perez-Gil J. Synthetic pulmonary surfactant preparations: New developments and future trends. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:393–403. doi: 10.2174/092986708783497364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Serrano AG, Perez-Gil J. Protein-lipid interactions and surface activity in the pulmonary surfactant system. Chem Phys Lipids. 2006;141:105–118. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Foot NJ, Orgeig S, Donnellan S, Bertozzi T, Daniels CB. Positive selection in the N-terminal extramembrane domain of lung surfactant protein C (SP-C) in marine mammals. J Mol Evol. 2007;65:12–22. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Johansson J, Szyperski T, Curstedt T, Wuthrich K. The Nmr Structure of the Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Polypeptide Sp-C in an Apolar Solvent Contains a Valyl-Rich Alpha-Helix. Biochemistry. 1994;33:6015–6023. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gonzalez-Horta A, Andreu D, Morrow MR, Perez-Gil J. Effects of palmitoylation on dynamics and phospholipid-bilayer-perturbing properties of the N-terminal segment of pulmonary surfactant protein SP-C as shown by H-2-NMR. Biophys J. 2008;95:2308–2317. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.132845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Plasencia I, Baumgart F, Andreu D, Marsh D, Perezgil J. Effect of acylation on the interaction of the N-Terminal segment of pulmonary surfactant protein SP-C with phospholipid membranes. 2008. In Press, Corrected Proof. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gericke A, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R. Structure and orientation of lung surfactant SP-C and L-alpha-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine in aqueous monolayers. Biophys J. 1997;73:492–499. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78087-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vandenbussche G, Clercx A, Curstedt T, Johansson J, Jornvall H, Ruysschaert JM. Structure and Orientation of the Surfactant-Associated Protein-C in a Lipid Bilayer. Eur J Biochem. 1992;203:201–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb19848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Creuwels L, Boer EH, Demel RA, Vangolde LMG, Haagsman HP. Neutralization of the Positive Charges of Surfactant Protein-C - Effects on Structure and Function. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:16225–16229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.27.16225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bi XH, Flach CR, Perez-Gil J, Plasencia I, Andreu D, Oliveira E, Mendelsohn R. Secondary structure and lipid interactions of the N-terminal segment of pulmonary surfactant SP-C in Langmuir films: IR reflection-absorption spectroscopy and surface pressure studies. Biochemistry. 2002;41:8385–8395. doi: 10.1021/bi020129g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gustafsson M, Griffiths WJ, Furusjo E, Johansson J. The palmitoyl groups of lung surfactant protein C reduce unfolding into a fibrillogenic intermediate. J Mol Biol. 2001;310:937–950. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang ZD, Gurel O, Baatz JE, Notter RH. Acylation of pulmonary surfactant protein-C is required for its optimal surface active interactions with phospholipids. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19104–19109. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oosterlakendijksterhuis MA, Haagsman HP, Vangolde LMG, Demel RA. Characterization of Lipid Insertion into Monomolecular Layers Mediated by Lung Surfactant Proteins Sp-B and Sp-C. Biochemistry. 1991;30:10965–10971. doi: 10.1021/bi00109a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ding JQ, Takamoto DY, von Nahmen A, Lipp MM, Lee KYC, Waring AJ, Zasadzinski JA. Effects of lung surfactant proteins, SP-B and SP-C, and palmitic acid on monolayer stability. Biophys J. 2001;80:2262–2272. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76198-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang L, Cai P, Galla HJ, He HX, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R. Monolayer-multilayer transitions in a lung surfactant model: IR reflection-absorption spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. European Biophysics Journal with Biophysics Letters. 2005;34:243–254. doi: 10.1007/s00249-004-0446-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gustafsson M, Palmblad M, Curstedt T, Johansson J, Schurch S. Palmitoylation of a pulmonary surfactant protein C analogue affects the surface associated lipid reservoir and film stability. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes. 2000;1466:169–178. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00198-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakorn PN, Meyer MC, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R, Galla HJ. Surfactant protein C and lung function: new insights into the role of alpha-helical length and palmitoylation. European Biophysics Journal with Biophysics Letters. 2007;36:477–489. doi: 10.1007/s00249-006-0102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alonso C, Waring A, Zasadzinski JA. Keeping Lung Surfactant Where It Belongs: Protein Regulation of Two-Dimensional Viscosity. Biophys J. 2005;89:266–273. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.052092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Szyperski T, Vandenbussche G, Curstedt T, Ruysschaert JM, Wuthrich K, Johansson J. Pulmonary surfactant-associated polypeptide C in a mixed organic solvent transforms from a monomeric alpha-helical state into insoluble beta-sheet aggregates. Protein Sci. 1998;7:2533–40. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560071206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gustafsson M, Thyberg J, Naslund J, Eliasson E, Johansson J. Amyloid fibril formation by pulmonary surfactant protein C. FEBS Lett. 1999;464:138–42. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01692-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johansson J, Nilsson G, Stromberg R, Robertson B, Jornvall H, Curstedt T. Secondary Structure and Biophysical Activity of Synthetic Analogs of the Pulmonary Surfactant Polypeptide Sp-C. Biochem J. 1995;307:535–541. doi: 10.1042/bj3070535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hawgood S, Ogawa A, Yukitake K, Schlueter M, Brown C, White T, Buckley D, Lesikar D, Benson B. Lung function in premature rabbits treated with recombinant human surfactant protein-C. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:484–490. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.2.8756826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lukovic D, Plasencia I, Taberner FJ, Salgado J, Calvete JJ, Perez-Gil J, Mingarro I. Production and characterisation of recombinant forms of human pulmonary surfactant protein C (SP-C): Structure and surface activity. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes. 2006;1758:509–518. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Davis AJ, Jobe AH, Hafner D, Ikegami M. Lung function in premature lambs and rabbits treated with a recombinant SP-C surfactant. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1998;157:553–559. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.97-08019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Spragg RG, Lewis JF, Walmrath H, Johannigman J, Bellingan G, Laterre P, Witte MC, Richards GA, Rippin G, Rathgeb F, Hafner D, Taut FJH, Seeger W. Effect of recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant on the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:884–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nilsson G, Gustafsson M, Vandenbussche G, Veldhuizen E, Griffiths WJ, Sjovall J, Haagsman HP, Ruysschaert JM, Robertson B, Curstedt T, Johansson J. Synthetic peptide-containing surfactants - Evaluation of transmembrane versus amphipathic helices and surfactant protein C poly-valyl to poly-leucyl substitution. Eur J Biochem. 1998;255:116–124. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2550116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takei T, Hashimoto Y, Aiba T, Sakai K, Fujiwara T. The surface properties of chemically synthesized peptides analogous to human pulmonary surfactant protein SP-C. Biol Pharm Bull. 1996;19:1247–1253. doi: 10.1248/bpb.19.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johansson J, Some M, Linderholm BM, Almlen A, Curstedt T, Robertson B. A synthetic surfactant based on a poly-Leu SP-C analog and phospholipids: effects on tidal volumes and lung gas volumes in ventilated immature newborn rabbits. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:2055–2063. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00153.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Palmblad M, Johansson J, Robertson B, Curstedt T. Biophysical activity of an artificial surfactant containing an analogue of surfactant protein (SP)-C and native SP-B. Biochem J. 1999;339:381–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Almlen A, Stichtenoth G, Robertson B, Johansson J, Curstedt T. Concentration dependence of a poly-leucine surfactant protein C analogue on in vitro and in vivo surfactant activity. Neonatology. 2007;92:194–200. doi: 10.1159/000102057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miller SM, Simon RJ, Ng S, Zuckermann RN, Kerr JM, Moos WH. Comparison of the Proteolytic Susceptibilities of Homologous L-Amino-Acid, D-Amino-Acid, and N-Substituted Glycine Peptide and Peptoid Oligomers. Drug Dev Res. 1995;35:20–32. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chongsiriwatana NP, Patch JA, Czyzewski AM, Dohm MT, Ivankin A, Gidalevitz D, Zuckermann RN, Barron AE. Peptoids that mimic the structure, function, and mechanism of helical antimicrobial peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:2794–2799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708254105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gibbons JA, Hancock AA, Vitt CR, Knepper S, Buckner SA, Brune ME, Milicic I, Kerwin JF, Richter LS, Taylor EW, Spear KL, Zuckermann RN, Spellmeyer DC, Braeckman RA, Moos WH. Pharmacologic characterization of CHIR 2279, an N-substituted glycine peptoid with high-affinity binding for alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277:885–899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu CW, Kirshenbaum K, Sanborn TJ, Patch JA, Huang K, Dill KA, Zuckermann RN, Barron AE. Structural and spectroscopic studies of peptoid oligomers with alpha-chiral aliphatic side chains. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13525–13530. doi: 10.1021/ja037540r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wu CW, Sanborn TJ, Huang K, Zuckermann RN, Barron AE. Peptoid oligomers with alpha-chiral, aromatic side chains: Sequence requirements for the formation of stable peptoid helices. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:6778–6784. doi: 10.1021/ja003154n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sanborn TJ, Wu CW, Zuckerman RN, Barron AE. Extreme stability of helices formed by water-soluble poly-N-substituted glycines (polypeptoids) with alpha-chiral side chains. Biopolymers. 2002;63:12–20. doi: 10.1002/bip.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brown NJ, Wu CW, Seurynck-Servoss SL, Barron AE. Effects of Hydrophobic Helix Length and Side Chain Chemistry on Biomimicry in Peptoid Analogues of SP-C. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1808–1818. doi: 10.1021/bi7021975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wu CW, Seurynck SL, Lee KY, Barron AE. Helical peptoid mimics of lung surfactant protein C. Chem Biol. 2003;10:1057–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Clercx A, Vandenbussche G, Curstedt T, Johansson J, Jornvall H, Ruysschaert JF. Structural and Functional Importance of the C-Terminal Part of the Pulmonary Surfactant Polypeptide Sp-C. Eur J Biochem. 1995;229:465–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



