Skip to main content
Viral Immunology logoLink to Viral Immunology
. 2012 Feb;25(1):29–36. doi: 10.1089/vim.2011.0051

Associations Between Demographic Variables and Multiple Measles-Specific Innate and Cell-Mediated Immune Responses After Measles Vaccination

Benjamin J Umlauf 1, Iana H Haralambieva 1,,2, Inna G Ovsyannikova 1,,2, Richard B Kennedy 1,,2, V Shane Pankratz 3, Robert M Jacobson 1,,2,,4, Gregory A Poland 1,,2,
PMCID: PMC3271368  PMID: 22239234

Abstract

Measles remains a public health concern due to a lack of vaccine use and vaccine failure. A better understanding of the factors that influence variations in immune responses, including innate/inflammatory and adaptive cellular immune responses, following measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination could increase our knowledge of measles vaccine-induced immunity and potentially lead to better vaccines. Measles-specific innate/inflammatory and adaptive cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses were characterized using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to quantify the levels of secreted IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IFN-λ1, and TNF-α in PBMC cultures following in vitro stimulation with measles virus (MV) in a cohort of 764 school-aged children. IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed to ascertain the number of measles-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells. Cytokine responses were then tested for associations with self-declared demographic data, including gender, race, and ethnicity. Females secreted significantly more TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-α (p<0.001, p<0.002, p<0.04, respectively) compared to males. Caucasians secreted significantly more IFN-λ1, IL-10, IL-2, TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-α (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.003, p<0.01, and p<0.02, respectively) compared to the other racial groups combined. Additionally, Caucasians had a greater number of IFN-γ-secreting cells compared to other racial groups (p<0.001). Ethnicity was not significantly correlated with variations in measles-specific CMI measures. Our data suggest that innate/inflammatory and CMI cytokine responses to measles vaccine vary significantly by gender and race. These data further advance our understanding regarding inter-individual and subgroup variations in immune responses to measles vaccination.

Introduction

Vaccination against measles virus (MV) using a live attenuated viral vaccine is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at 12–15 mo and 4–6 y of age to impart lifelong immunity against MV infection (1,56). This vaccination regimen has led to a remarkable decline in the incidence of measles infection in the United States; however, measles remains a serious public health concern due to a lack of vaccine coverage, both in the United States and worldwide, and also due to vaccine failure (27,35,45,48). Primary vaccine failure, which has mainly been attributed to a suboptimal humoral immune response to the measles vaccine, is the major source of vaccine failure and occurs in approximately 2–10% of individuals vaccinated with measles vaccine (14,34,47,52,54). Secondary vaccine failure, or waning of the measles-specific antibody titer, has also been suggested as a minor factor in measles outbreaks (2,29,30).

The gold standard to determine the protective humoral immune response to measles is a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to measure circulating neutralizing antibody titer against the viral surface hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins (5,6). Generally, a neutralizing PRNT antibody titer (the serum dilution that reduces the number of plaques by 50%) >120 is defined as a protective antibody titer (6). However, long-standing evidence suggests that a successful immune response (clearance of wild-type measles infection) against MV can occur in the absence of a detectable humoral immune response (18). Thus a greater understanding of the respective roles of innate/inflammatory, humoral, and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses following measles vaccination is needed. In addition, these data also imply that measles infection occurring after vaccination could be related to a suboptimal innate or CMI response.

Variation in measles-specific CMI responses has been associated with multiple genetic factors, including HLA gene polymorphisms and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in cytokine, cytokine receptor, and innate immunity genes (9,11,41,42). These data also imply that variations in measles-specific innate/inflammatory and CMI responses may also be associated with demographic variables in a given population; thus offering a macro-scale view of variations in measles vaccine-induced innate/inflammatory and CMI responses. These data could potentially be used to create improved vaccines that are designed to upregulate key innate/inflammatory or CMI pathways in an effort to generate a protective immune response in a greater proportion of the population following measles vaccination (49,50).

To expand and test the hypothesis for gender and racial differences in measles-specific cytokine responses, we examined associations between innate/inflammatory and CMI responses following two doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and demographic or clinical variables. Specifically, a large population-based study was conducted (n=764) to determine measles-specific immune responses in children and young adults 11–22 years of age vaccinated with two doses of MMR vaccine. Associations between gender, race, or ethnicity, and cytokine measures (secreted IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IFN-λ1, TNF-α, as well as IFN-γ ELISPOT responses) were examined to determine if demographic variables were significantly associated with measles vaccine-induced innate/inflammatory and CMI responses. We reported such associations with humoral immunity in a previous article (23), and herein focus on markers of cell-mediated immunity.

Methods

Study subjects

The study cohort was comprised of a combined sample of 821 subjects from two independent, age-stratified random cohorts of healthy schoolchildren and young adults from all socioeconomic strata in Rochester, Minnesota, from which 764 were eligible for the current study (23). Between December 2006 and August 2007, 440 healthy children were enrolled (age 11–19 y) in Rochester, MN (cohort 1) as previously reported (7,20,36,38). Three-hundred ninety-six parents agreed to allow their children to take part in this study, and from these 396 children we obtained blood samples. From November 2008 through September 2009, an additional 381 healthy children and young adults were enrolled (age 11–22 y) in Rochester, Minnesota (cohort 2), and we also obtained blood samples from these 381 children (22,23,39,40).

Individuals born outside the United States were excluded from the study, and all participants received two and only two documented doses of MMR (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ) vaccine containing the attenuated Edmonston strain of MV (50% tissue culture infective dose of ≥1000). Additionally, no known circulating wild MV was observed in the community since the earliest year of birth for any subject. From the 821 study subjects who were enrolled, self-declared demographic data and immune measures were available for 764 subjects, who composed the final sample population. The institutional review board (IRB) of the Mayo Clinic approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all children who participated in the study, as well as written informed consent from age-appropriate children and young adults.

Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

One hundred milliliters of whole blood was collected from each participant in Cell Preparation Tube with Sodium Citrate (CPT; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) tubes, and PBMCs were isolated within 24 h according to manufacturer's protocol. Isolated PBMCs were resuspended at a concentration of 1×107 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 media containing L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Protide Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN) and 20% fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), frozen overnight at −80°C in a controlled-rate freezing container, and transferred to liquid nitrogen for storage until use.

Measurement of IFN-γ-secreting cells

The IFN cytokine response was assessed using commercially available IFN ELISPOT kits from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) as previously described (51). Briefly, an ELISPOT plate pre-coated with anti-human IFN-γ antibody (Ab) was blocked for 20 min with RPMI culture medium supplemented with 5% FCS. One aliquot of 5×106 cryopreserved PBMCs was thawed, counted, and resuspended in RPMI culture medium supplemented with 5% FCS. Seven wells were plated with 2×105 PBMCs per well for each subject; three wells were supplemented with live MV (Edmonston strain of MV, MOI 0.5); three wells were supplemented with culture medium to serve as negative controls, and one well was supplemented with 5 μg/mL of PHA-P to serve as a positive control. Any subject negative for PHA-P was repeated. The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for precisely 42 h. After incubation, the plates were developed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The plates were read with an ImmunoSpot S4 Pro Analyzer from C.T.L. (Cleveland, OH). Counting parameters were optimized to precisely and accurately count all ELISPOT plates. Several plates were assessed to optimize the counting parameters, including sensitivity, spot size thresholds, background hue, and spot separation (51). Once the counting parameters were established, these parameters were used to count all ELISPOT plates, ensuring that spots were counted consistently across all subjects. Quality control was performed by a single individual for each plate to manually eliminate any spurious spots resulting from debris or overdeveloped regions.

Measurement of secreted cytokines

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed to measure the level of seven (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IFN-λ1, and TNF-α) cytokines secreted by PBMCs following in vitro stimulation with live MV (Edmonston strain of MV) as previously described (37). Briefly, 1.5×107 cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, counted, and resuspended in RPMI culture medium supplemented with 5% FCS. Eleven wells on three 96-well round-bottom plates were plated with 2×105 cells/well. Five wells were supplemented with MV (the MOI is dependent on the cytokine, as described below), five wells were supplemented with RPMI culture medium with 5% FCS to serve as negative controls, and one well was supplemented with PHA-P to serve as a positive control. Any subject negative for PHA-P was repeated. The MOI and incubation time for each cytokine was as follows: IL-2, MOI 0.5, 48 h; IL-6, MOI 1.0, 72 h; IL-10, MOI 0.5, 48 h; IFN-α, MOI 1.0, 24 h; IFN-γ, MOI 1.0, 72 h; IFN-λ1, MOI 1.0, 72 h; TNF-α, MOI 1.0, 24 h, as previously optimized (37,44). After incubation, cell-free supernatants were harvested from each plate, transferred to a 96-well flat-bottom plate, and frozen at −80°C until analysis. Cytokine levels were measured with commercial kits according to the manufacturer's instructions. IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were measured using commercial kits from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), IFN-α was measured using commercial kits from Mabtech (Cincinnati, OH), and IFN-λ1 was measured using commercial kits from R&D Systems. Cytokine concentrations were determined by measuring absorbance at 450 nm correlated with a standard curve created by performing serial dilutions of the manufacturer's reference standard.

Other cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, and IL-17, were not quantified in this study, due to the negligible amounts of these cytokines detected in PBMC cultures (stimulated with MV) in our previous studies (11,21).

Statistical analysis

The statistical methods described herein are similar to those reported in previous articles (7,23,53). The comparisons of interest in this report are differences between patient-level demographic data and cellular immune measures of response to measles vaccination. The demographic characteristics were descriptively summarized across individuals using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables. A total of eight measures were assessed, as described above. Assessments of cytokine secretion for each of the measured cytokines resulted in five recorded values per outcome prior to stimulation with MV, and five values post-stimulation. In contrast, the ELISPOT assessments resulted in three recorded values pre-stimulation and three post-stimulation. For summary purposes, a single response measurement per individual was obtained for each outcome by subtracting the median of the unstimulated values from the median of the stimulated values. These single per-individual results were descriptively summarized across individuals using medians and interquartile ranges. Associations between each of the demographic or clinical variables (age, gender, race and ethnicity, recruitment cohort, and timing of immunization relative to recruitment), and each of the measures of innate and CMI were assessed using linear mixed models approaches on all of the repeated measurements (both stimulated and unstimulated) obtained for each immune measure on each subject. These approaches are similar to ANOVA, but allow for the analysis of repeated measurements made on each subject by accounting for the degree to which the measurements are correlated within a person. In these models, the data were rank-transformed to meet modeling assumptions, and tested for associations between demographic characteristics and an MV stimulation effect by assessing the interaction between a variable indicating stimulation status, and a variable indicating demographic group membership, while controlling for within-subject correlations. In addition to performing tests of significance for each measure individually, assessments were performed in which each of the demographic variables was adjusted for all others. Analyses were carried out using the SAS version 9 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) software system.

Results

Study population characteristics

The median age of participants at the time of enrollment was 15 years (IQR 13.0–17.0 ), as previously reported (23). The median age at first measles vaccination was 15 months (IQR 15.0–16.0 ), the median age at second measles vaccination was 5.0 years (IQR 4.0–11.0 ), and the median time from second measles vaccination to enrollment in the study was 7.4 years (IQR 5.6–9.2 ) (23).

Demographic characteristics

Self-declared demographic data were used for all demographic analyses (Table 1). The sample population was relatively balanced in terms of gender, with 55.9% males and 44.1% females. The majority, 80.6%, of the sample population indicated that they were of Caucasian descent. Likewise, 97.1% of study participants were Not Hispanic or Latino.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Cohort

Variable Result
Gender, n (%)
 Male 427 (55.9)
 Female 337 (44.1)
Race, n (%)
 Caucasian 616 (80.6)
 African-American 89 (11.7)
 Asian, Hawaiian, Pacific Islander 22 (2.9)
 Other, multiple or unknown 37 (4.8)
Ethnicity, n (%)
 Not Hispanic or Latino 742 (97.1)
 Hispanic or Latino 15 (2.0)
 Unknown 7 (0.9)

Detection of CMI responses

A wide range of secreted cytokines were detected in PBMC culture supernatants following in vitro stimulation with live MV as shown in Table 2. Strong interferon and proinflammatory cytokine responses were primarily detected. Specifically, we detected robust secretion of IFN-α, high secretion levels of IFN-γ, moderate secretion of IFN-λ1, and slight secretion of TNF-α. In addition, robust secretion of IL-6, moderate secretion of IL-2, and slight secretion of IL-10 was detected.

Table 2.

Secreted Cytokine Levels of the Study Cohort

Cytokine Assays performed (n) Median (IQR) pg/mL
IL-2 758 37.5 (20.5–64.4)
IL-6 756 354.6 (248.5–461.4)
IL-10 759 18.3 (11.3–28.5)
IFN-α 753 550.9 (272.6–1,031.2)
IFN-γ 756 67.4 (35.2–120.5)
IFN-λ1 757 34.1 (14.1–73.2)
TNF-α 751 13.7 (9.2–18.8)

IQR, interquartile range.

The frequencies of IFN-γ-secreting cells were measured following MV stimulation using ELISPOT assays. Specifically, 726 IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed, and the median detection of measles-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells was 36.0 spot-forming units (sfu) per 200,000 cells (IQR 13.0–69.0 sfu) as previously reported (23).

Associations between CMI responses and demographic data

Associations between demographic data and measles-specific CMI responses were examined to determine whether gender, race, or ethnicity were associated with variations in measles-specific CMI measures.

Several immune outcomes significantly varied by gender as outlined in Table 3. Females had significantly higher levels of secreted TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-α (p<0.001, p<0.002, and p<0.04, respectively).

Table 3.

Variation in Measles-Specific CMI Responses by Gender

CMI measure Gender Median (IQR)apg/mL p Valueb p Valuec
TNF-α Male 13.5 (8.8–18.7) <0.001 <0.001
  Female 14.0 (9.6–19.4)    
IL-6 Male 339.1 (235.4–446.6) 0.002 0.002
  Female 378.7 (269.5–480.9)    
IFN-α Male 523.0 (254.0–988.6) 0.07 0.04
  Female 609.6 (284.4–1093.7)    
a

IQR, interquartile range.

b

Univariate p value.

c

Multivariate p value, adjusting for all other demographic and clinical variables.

CMI, cell-mediated immune.

In addition, the levels of several secreted cytokines varied significantly by self-declared race (Table 4). Specifically, Caucasians had significantly higher levels of IFN-λ1, IL-10, IL-2, TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-α (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.003, p<0.01, and p<0.02, respectively) compared to all other racial groups combined (Caucasians versus non-Caucasians). Additionally, Caucasians had a greater number of IFN-γ-secreting cells compared to other racial groups (p<0.001).

Table 4.

Variation in Measles-Specific CMI Responses by Race

CMI measure Race Median (IQR)a p Valueb p Valuec
IFN-λ1 Caucasian 39.2 (16.6–76.3) pg/mL <0.001 <0.001
  Non-Caucasian 20.1 (5.4–48.8) pg/mL    
IL-10 Caucasian 19.0 (12.0–28.6) pg/mL <0.001 <0.001
  Non-Caucasian 14.5 (8.3–25.6) pg/mL    
IL-2 Caucasian 40.1 (21.6–66.7) pg/mL <0.001 <0.001
  Non-Caucasian 30.2 (14.6–47.5) pg/mL    
IFN-γ-secreting Caucasian 37.0 (15.1–67.0) sfud 0.005 <0.001
 cells Non-Caucasian 30.0 (11.0–72.0) sfud    
TNF-α Caucasian 13.9 (9.6–8.8) pg/mL <0.001 0.003
  Non-Caucasian 12.9 (9.6–9.4) pg/mL    
IFN-α Caucasian 592.7 (284.1–1,073.6) pg/mL 0.02 0.01
  Non-Caucasian 441.6 (246.4–784.6) pg/mL    
IL-6 Caucasian 354.9 (248.4–458.7) pg/mL 0.02 0.02
  Non-Caucasian 353.2 (254.0–476.3) pg/mL    
a

IQR, interquartile range.

b

Univariate p value.

c

Multivariate p value, adjusting for all other demographic and clinical variables.

d

Spot forming units per 200,000 cells.

Ethnicity was not significantly associated with variations in measles-specific CMI measures (data not shown).

Associations between CMI responses and clinical data

In addition, the number of detectable measles-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells was significantly associated with age at first vaccination (≤14 mo median=30.0 sfu, IQR 11.0–69.0 sfu; 15 mo median=40 sfu, IQR 16.5–78.5 sfu; >16 mo median=30.5 sfu, IQR 10.0–55.0 sfu; p<0.001).

Discussion

Race and gender have been associated with variations in immune response following viral vaccination with multiple pathogens, including measles (4,8,13,17,28,31,32,46). However, most measles studies have focused on racial and gender associations with humoral immunity (as the neutralizing antibodies are an accepted correlate of protection), rather than innate/inflammatory or CMI measures of immune response. In this study, measles-specific innate/inflammatory and CMI responses were examined in a healthy cohort of children and young adults who had received their second dose of MMR 7.4 y (median) earlier.

A Th-1-dominant cytokine response in concert with a robust innate/inflammatory cytokine secretion pattern was detected in PBMC cultures stimulated with live MV. Early studies examining CMI responses in children who had been vaccinated with measles vaccine suggested that a Th-2-like cytokine secretion pattern, driven primarily by the production of IL-4, dominated the CMI response to MV (19,55). However, more recent work has suggested that a Th-1-like cytokine secretion pattern, driven by IFN-γ secretion, dominates the response to measles vaccination in children and young adults after two doses of MMR vaccine (16,24,43).

Negligible amounts of the classical Th-2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 were detected in our previous studies of MV-stimulated PBMC culture supernatants (12,21), thus IL-10 rather than these cytokines was measured in the current study, as IL-10 plays a critical role in inhibiting the activity of Th-1 cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophages (3,15). Additionally, other studies have detected IL-10 secretion in PBMC cultures of individuals previously vaccinated with MV (3,15,33). In this study, we observed strong measles-specific secretion of IFN-γ, and high numbers of IFN-γ-secreting cells with only slight secretion of IL-10 (Table 1), which suggests a Th-1-biased recall immune response 7.4 years following the second MMR vaccination. In addition, this conclusion is further strengthened by the detection of moderate secretion of IFN-λ1, a cytokine that has been shown to induce a Th-1 bias (25,26), highlighting the important role of CMI in developing a robust, persistent immune response following measles vaccination.

Gender differences have also been associated with differences in measles antibody titers. A study of children and adults that had previously been vaccinated with MV containing vaccine from Catalonia, Spain (≥15 years of age) found that females have significantly higher measles-specific IgG titers following vaccination compared to age-matched males (13). No studies have shown gender associations with measles-specific CMI responses.

Males have been shown to have a greater CMI response (higher stimulation index [SI] in lymphoproliferation) to rubella virus at 2 and 4 week post-MMR vaccination, and to varicella zoster virus (higher frequencies of VZV-specific CD4+ T cells in healthy naturally immune adults) compared to females; thus it is feasible that CMI responses to measles vaccine also vary by gender (28,32). By assessing measles-specific cytokine responses 7.4 years following the last immunization, our study found that females secreted greater in vitro levels of innate/inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-α) compared to males.

This study suggests that females may have a more robust antiviral response to MV via secretion of innate/inflammatory cytokines upon MV recognition. The difference in median TNF-α secretion between males and females was negligible, although statistically significant. Although there was a statistically significant variation between females and males for some of the CMI measures, it is unlikely that these findings are clinically or biologically significant. The differences in both median IL-6 and IFN-α secretion between males and females (39.6 pg/mL and 86.6 pg/mL, respectively) were much larger. These translate into approximately a 10% and 14% increase in cytokine production, respectively. Although these findings might be biologically relevant, studies that monitor physiological changes with respect to cytokine levels are warranted to ascertain the biological/clinical relevance of the observed differential cytokine secretion by gender. Additionally, larger studies in vivo that monitor the kinetics of cytokine responses following measles vaccination (or measles infection) are also needed to validate these observations. Further, the age group studied in this study ranges from pre-pubescent to adolescent (age 11–22 years). It is known that cytokine responses may be modulated by sex hormones, which could potentially influence the results demonstrated in this study.

IL-6, a proinflammatory cytokine, and IFN-α, a type I interferon, are both essential to initiating an adaptive immune response. Other studies have shown that females have a higher measles-specific IgG titer compared to males (13). Thus we can speculate that the increased levels of some measles-specific cytokines secreted by females in response to MV stimulation may explain why females had higher antibody titers following measles vaccination compared to males.

Race and ethnicity have also been associated with both humoral and CMI responses to MV. A study of Innu, Inuit, and Caucasian schoolchildren from Newfoundland, Canada, found that Innu and Inuit children had a significantly higher measles seropositive rate, as well as higher measles antibody titers, following vaccination with a single dose of MMR vaccine as compared to Caucasian children (46). Additionally, a study of measles antibody seroprevalence in the U.S. from 1999–2004 found that non-Hispanic blacks had a significantly higher seroprevalence of measles antibodies compared to non-Hispanic whites (although the authors suggest that this might be due to natural measles infection), and that Mexican Americans had a significantly lower seroprevalence of measles antibodies than non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks (31). Genetic factors, including SNPs in cytokine and cytokine receptor genes, have also been significantly associated with measles-induced immunity in Caucasians and Somali African-Americans (8,10).

The race-specific innate/inflammatory and CMI cytokine immune response data from this study are interesting due to the wide range of cytokines that were differentially expressed in Caucasians as compared to other races combined. Caucasians secreted significantly greater amounts of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 (with pleiotropic effects in immunoregulation and inflammation), as well as significantly greater amounts of multiple immunostimulating cytokines, such as antiviral interferons, IFN-α, TNF-α, and IFN-λ1, and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6. However, similarly to the gender-specific analysis, it is possible that some of the race-specific statistically significant associations have limited clinical or biological significance, due to the minimal differences seen among median secretion levels between Caucasians and all other races combined. Future studies designed to look specifically for dose-related physiological changes of a given cytokine over time, in response to MV stimulation or in vivo, could offer a clearer picture of the precise clinical relevance of these data.

Interestingly, our data demonstrated an upregulation of both immunosuppressive CMI and immunostimulating innate cytokines in Caucasians. Previous studies have associated IL-10 with immunosuppression and impaired T-cell responses (3,15,33); however, these data indicate that Caucasians had increased expression of innate stimulating cytokines in addition to increased IL-10 expression. In part, undersampling of minority races in this study could explain these observations. However, at a macro level an interesting observation can be drawn from these data. Caucasians had increased expression of both immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive cytokines following measles vaccination. It is possible that the immunosuppressive properties of IL-10 are being balanced by the significantly higher expression of immunostimulatory cytokines such that Caucasians still generate a successful immune response following measles vaccination. This idea also implies that different races might have differential activation of biological pathways essential to generating an immune response. To fully understand the implications of differential cytokine production patterns, a systems biology approach that combines immunologic data with high-dimensional laboratory assays and clinical data sets could use pathway analysis to explain the impact of race-specific differential cytokine expression following MV stimulation.

This study had multiple strengths, including a large study population and the use of a wide range of measles-specific innate/inflammatory and CMI markers to immunologically characterize the study population. Additionally, the study population consisted of a random sample of children and young adults 11–22 years of age. The time and detail spent to recruit a random sample population was designed to increase confidence that the outcomes derived from the data would be relevant. The sample population was balanced in terms of gender distribution, but had limited racial and ethnic diversity. This limited the statistical power to associate small variations in measles-specific CMI responses with race or ethnicity. Additionally, this study relied on self-declared race information rather than genetic determinants to assign demographic information. Using principal component analysis with high-density SNP typing to determine racial background could allow for more precise subject classification. In the future, enriching the sample population with racial and ethnic minorities would increase the ability to elucidate race- and ethnicity-specific associations with measles-specific CMI measures. Additionally, sampling the study population prior to, and at multiple time points after, vaccination (which was not feasible in our study) could provide a better understanding of measles-specific innate/inflammatory and adaptive immune responses, as well as the kinetics of cytokine responses following vaccination.

In summary, Th-1-dominated cytokine patterns, as well as important immunostimulating cytokines, were predominantly detected, highlighting the importance of innate/inflammatory and CMI responses in generating a successful measles immune response. The humoral immune responses of this cohort have been described previously, with no reported seronegative individuals, and 91.1% with antibody concentrations above the protective threshold (210 mIU/mL, corresponding to a PRMN titer of 120) (23). Finally, we observed that innate/inflammatory and CMI responses to MV vary significantly by gender and race, advancing our understanding of inter-individual and subgroup variations in immune responses to measles vaccination. Delineating mechanisms that induce variations in the immune response to MV could facilitate the development of the next generation of vaccines that increase a host's immune responses following measles vaccination.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all of the children and parents who participated in this study. We would like to acknowledge and thank the laboratory staff, statisticians, and nurses at the Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group for their invaluable assistance with this study, as well as Megan O'Byrne for her immense help with statistical analysis. This project was supported by award numbers AI33144 and AI48793 (which recently received a MERIT Award) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and 5UL1RR024150-03 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID or the NIH.

Author Disclosure Statement

Dr. Poland is the chair of a safety evaluation committee for novel non-measles vaccines undergoing clinical studies by Merck Research Laboratories. Dr. Jacobson recently served on a Safety Review Committee for a post-licensure study conducted by Kaiser-Permanente concerning Gardasil HPV vaccine funded by Merck & Co. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices: Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0 Through 18 Years—United States, 2010. MMWR. 2010;58:1–4. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6504a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anders JF. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Jacobsen SJ. Wollan PC. Secondary failure rates of measles vaccines: a metaanalysis of published studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:62–66. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199601000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brooks DG. Trifilo MJ. Edelmann KH. Teyton L. McGavern DB. Oldstone MB. Interleukin-10 determines viral clearance or persistence in vivo. Nat Med. 2006;12:1301–1319. doi: 10.1038/nm1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Christensen PE. Schmidt H. Jensen O. Bang HO. Andersen V. Jordal B. An epidemic of measles in Southern Greenland, 1951. Measles in virgin soil. I. Acta Med Scand. 1953;144:313–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1953.tb15701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen BJ. Audet S. Andrews N. Beeler J. Plaque reduction neutralization test for measles antibodies: Description of a standardised laboratory method for use in immunogenicity studies of aerosol vaccination. Vaccine. 2007;26:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cohen BJ. Parry RP. Doblas D, et al. Measles immunity testing: comparison of two measles IgG ELISAs with plaque reduction neutralisation assay. J Virol Methods. 2006;131:209–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dhiman N. Haralambieva IH. Vierkant RA, et al. Predominant inflammatory cytokine secretion pattern in response to two doses of live rubella vaccine in health vaccinees. Cytokine. 2010;50:24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Cunningham JM, et al. Associations between measles vaccine immunity and single nucleotide polymorphisms in cytokine and cytokine receptor genes. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:21–29. doi: 10.1086/510596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Vierkant RA. Pankratz VS. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Associations between cytokine/cytokine receptor SNPs and humoral immunity to measles, mumps and rubella in a Somali population. Tissue Antigens. 2008;72:211–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2008.01097.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Vierkant RA. Pankratz VS. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Associations between cytokine/cytokine receptor SNPs and humoral immunity to measles, mumps and rubella in a Somali population. Tissue Antigens. 2008;72:211–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2008.01097.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Vierkant RA, et al. Associations between SNPs in toll-like receptors and related intracellular signaling molecules and immune responses to measles vaccine: preliminary results. Vaccine. 2008;26:1731–1736. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Vierkant RA, et al. Associations between SNPs in toll-like receptors and related intracellular signaling molecules and immune responses to measles vaccine: preliminary results. Vaccine. 2008;26:1731–1736. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dominguez A. Plans P. Costa J, et al. Seroprevalence of measles, rubella, and mumps antibodies in Catalonia, Spain: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:310–317. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0133-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elliman D. Sengupta N. Measles. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:229–234. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000168383.93647.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fiorentino DF. Zlotnik A. Vieira P, et al. IL-10 acts on the antigen-presenting cell to inhibit cytokine production by Th1 cells. J Immunol. 1991;146:3444–3451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gans HA. Maldonado Y. Yasukawa LL, et al. IL-12, IFN-gamma, and T cell proliferation to measles in immunized infants. J Immunol. 1999;162:5569–5575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gardner EM. Gonzalez EW. Nogusa S. Murasko DM. Age-related changes in the immune response to influenza vaccination in a racially diverse, healthy elderly population. Vaccine. 2006;24:1609–1614. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Good RA. Zak SJ. Disturbances in gamma globulin synthesis as “experiments of nature.”. Pediatrics. 1956;18:109–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Griffin DE. Ward BJ. Differential CD4 T cell activation in measles. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:275–281. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.2.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haralambieva IH. Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG, et al. 2′-5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase single-nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes are associated with variations in immune responses to rubella vaccine. Hum Immunol. 2010;71:383–391. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haralambieva IH. Ovsyannikova IG. Dhiman N. Vierkant RA. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Differential cellular immune responses to wild-type and attenuated Edmonston tag measles virus strains are primarily defined by the viral phosphoprotein gene. J Med Virol. 2010;82:1966–1975. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haralambieva IH. Ovsyannikova IG. Kennedy RB, et al. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes in cytokine, cytokine receptor genes, immunity to measles vaccination. Vaccine. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Haralambieva IH. Ovsyannikova IG. O'Byrne M. Pankratz VS. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. A large observational study to concurrently assess persistence of measles specific B-cell and T-cell immunity in individuals following two doses of MMR vaccine. Vaccine. 2011;29:4485–4491. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howe RC. Dhiman N. Ovsyannikova IG. Poland GA. Induction of CD4 T cell proliferation and Th1-like cytokine responses in vitro to measles virus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;140:333–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02766.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jordan WJ. Eskdale J. Boniotto M. Rodia M. Kellner D. Gallagher G. Modulation of the human cytokine response by interferon lambda-1 (IFN-lambda1/IL-29) Genes Immun. 2007;8:13–20. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jordan WJ. Eskdale J. Srinivas S, et al. Human interferon lambda-1 (IFN-lambda1/IL-29) modulates the Th1/Th2 response. Genes Immun. 2007;8:254–261. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katz SL. A vaccine-preventable infectious disease kills half a million children annually. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1679–1680. doi: 10.1086/497172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Klein NP. Holmes TH. Sharp MA, et al. Variability and gender differences in memory T cell immunity to varicella-zoster virus in healthy adults. Vaccine. 2006;24:5913–5918. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee KY. Lee HS. Hur JK. Kang JH. Lee BC. The changing epidemiology of hospitalized pediatric patients in three measles outbreaks. J Infect. 2007;54:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Markowitz LE. Preblud SR. Fine PEM. Orenstein WA. Duration of live measles vaccine-induced immunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:101–110. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199002000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McQuillan GM. Kruszon-Moran D. Hyde TB. Forghani B. Bellini W. Dayan GH. Seroprevalence of measles antibody in the US population, 1999–2004. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:1459–1464. doi: 10.1086/522866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mitchell LA. Sex differences in antibody- and cell-mediated immune response to rubella re-immunisation. J Med Microbiol. 1999;48:1075–1080. doi: 10.1099/00222615-48-12-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moss WJ. Ota MO. Griffin DE. Measles: immune suppression and immune responses. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1380–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Orenstein WA. Herrmann K. Albrecht P, et al. Immunity against measles and rubella in Massachusetts schoolchildren. Develop Biol Standard. 1986;65:75–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Otten M. Kezaala R. Fall A, et al. Public-health impact of accelerated measles control in the WHO African Region 2000–03. Lancet. 2005;366:832–839. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67216-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ovsyannikova IG. Dhiman N. Haralambieva IH, et al. Rubella vaccine-induced cellular immunity: evidence of associations with polymorphisms in the toll-like, vitamin A and D receptors, and innate immune response genes. Hum Genet. 2010;127:207–221. doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0763-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ovsyannikova IG. Dhiman N. Jacobson RM. Vierkant RA. Pankratz VS. Poland GA. HLA homozygosity does not adversely effect measles vaccine-induced cytokine responses. Virology. 2007;364:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ovsyannikova IG. Haralambieva IH. Dhiman N, et al. Polymorphisms in the vitamin A receptor and innate immunity genes influence the antibody response to rubella vaccination. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:207–213. doi: 10.1086/649588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ovsyannikova IG. Haralambieva IH. Vierkant RA. O'Byrne MM. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. The association of CD46, SLAM, and CD209 cellular receptor gene SNPs with variations in measles vaccine-induced immune responses—A replication study and examination of novel polymorphisms. Hum Hered. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Ovsyannikova IG. Haralambieva IH. Vierkant RA. Pankratz VS. Poland GA. The role of polymorphisms in toll-like receptors and their associated intracellular signaling genes in measles vaccine immunity. Hum Genet. 2011;130:547–561. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-0977-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ovsyannikova IG. Jacobson RM. Ryan JE. Vierkant RA. Pankratz VS. Poland GA. Human leukocyte antigen and interleukin 2, 10 and 12p40 cytokine responses to measles: Is there evidence of the HLA effect? Cytokine. 2006;36:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ovsyannikova IG. Jacobson RM. Vierkant RA. Pankratz SV. Jacobsen SJ. Poland GA. Associations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and very high levels of measles antibody following vaccination. Vaccine. 2004;22:1914–1920. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ovsyannikova IG. Reid KC. Jacobson RM. Oberg AL. Klee GG. Poland GA. Cytokine production patterns and antibody response to measles vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21:3946–3953. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00272-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ovsyannikova IG. Ryan JE. Vierkant RA. Pankratz SV. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Immunologic significance of HLA class I genes in measles virus-specific IFN-gamma and IL-4 cytokine immune responses. Immunogenetics. 2005;57:828–836. doi: 10.1007/s00251-005-0061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Poland GA. Jacobson RM. Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1815–1820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Poland GA. Jacobson RM. Colbourne SA, et al. Measles antibody seroprevalence rates among immunized Inuit, Innu and Caucasian subjects. Vaccine. 1999;17:1525–1531. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00362-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Poland GA. Jacobson RM. Schaid D. Moore SB. Jacobsen SJ. HLA alleles and measles vaccine-induced antibody levels: evidence of a significant association. Vaccine. 1998;16:1869–1871. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Poland GA. Jacobson RM. Thampy AM, et al. Measles re-immunization in children seronegative after initial immunization. JAMA. 1997;277:1156–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Poland GA. Ovsyannikova IG. Jacobson RM. Application of pharmacogenomics to vaccines. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10:837–852. doi: 10.2217/PGS.09.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Poland GA. Ovsyannikova IG. Jacobson RM. Smith DI. Heterogeneity in vaccine immune response: the role of immunogenetics and the emerging field of vaccinomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82:653–664. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ryan JE. Ovsyannikova IG. Poland GA. Detection of measles virus-specific interferon-gamma-secreting T-cells by ELISPOT. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;302:207–218. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-903-6:207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sheppeard V. Forssman B. Ferson MJ, et al. Vaccine failures and vaccine effectiveness in children during measles outbreaks in New South Wales, March–May 2006. Commun Dis Intell. 2009;33:21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tosh PK. Kennedy RB. Vierkant RA. Jacobson RM. Poland GA. Correlation between rubella antibody levels and cytokine measures of cell-mediated immunity. Viral Immunol. 2009;22:451–456. doi: 10.1089/vim.2009.0068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vartdal F. Gaudernack G. Funderud S, et al. HLA class I and II typing using cells positively selected from blood by immunomagnetic isolation—a fast and reliable technique. Tissue Antigens. 1986;28:301–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1986.tb00500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ward BJ. Griffin DE. Changes in cytokine production after measles virus vaccination: predominant production of IL-4 suggests induction of a Th2 response. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993;67:171–177. doi: 10.1006/clin.1993.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Watson JC. Hadler SC. Dykewicz CA. Reef S. Phillips L. Measles, mumps, and rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR. 1998;47:1–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Viral Immunology are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES