Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2012 Jan 15;5(1):72–79.

GC Glu416Asp and Thr420Lys polymorphisms contribute to gastrointestinal cancer susceptibility in a Chinese population

Liqing Zhou 1,*, Xiaojiao Zhang 2,*, Xuechao Chen 3,*, Li Liu 2, Chao Lu 2, Xiaohu Tang 2, Juan Shi 2, Meng Li 2, Mo Zhou 2, Zhouwei Zhang 2, Lingchen Xiao 2, Ming Yang 2
PMCID: PMC3272689  PMID: 22328951

Abstract

Vitamin D has potent anticancer properties, especially against gastrointestinal cancers. Group-specific component (GC), a key member of vitamin D pathway proteins, could bind to and transport vitamin D to target organs. As a polymorphic protein, two common coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) [Glu416Asp (rs7041) and Thr420Lys (rs4588)] were identified in its gene. These SNPs have been associated to circulating vitamin D levels and several cancer risks in different populations. However, there is no report on their role in gastrointestinal cancer development among Chinese to date. Therefore, we examined the association between these variants and risk of gastrointestinal cancers in a case-control cohort including 964 patients with four gastrointestinal cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer) and 1187 controls. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by logistic regression. We found that GC Thr420Lys polymorphism has significant impact on the risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers, especially colorectal cancer. Additionally, subjects who carrying GC Asp416-Lys420 haplotype, which contains the at-risk 420Lys allele, also showed significantly increased risk to develop gastrointestinal cancers. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that common genetic variants and haplo-types in GC may influence individual susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancers in Chinese population.

Keywords: Group-specific component, single nucleotide polymorphism, gastrointestinal cancer, susceptibility

Introduction

Vitamin D has potent anticancer properties, especially against gastrointestinal cancers. Reduced risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) was firstly correlated to vitamin D levels in vivo in 1980 [1]. This inverse relationship between vitamin D intake or circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25 (OH)D], a biomarker of vitamin D status and CRC was supported in both cohort studies [2-5] and case-control studies [6-8], although the association did not reach statistical significance in all reports. Similar inverse correlation was observed between vitamin D and esophageal cancer (EC) risk [5, 9]. Although inconsistent results on relationship between vitamin D and gastric cancer (GCa) were reported [5, 10], Ikezaki S et al did show that 24R.25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (a vitamin D3 derivative) exerts chemopreventive effects on glandular stomach carcinogenesis in rats [11]. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are few epidemiology studies on role of vitamin D in oncogenesis of liver. However, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (another vitamin D3 derivative) exhibited significantly anti-HCC activities ex vivo and in vivo [12-14], indicating the potential protective role of vitamin D in HCC development.

As a key protein of vitamin D pathway, group-specific component (GC, also known as vitamin D-binding protein) could bind to vitamin D and its plasma metabolites and transport them to target tissues. In addition, GC can be converted into a macrophage activating factor (GcMAF) by the stepwise action of β-galactosidase of B cells and sialidase of T cells [15]. During inflammation, GcMAF could stimulate phagocytotic activity of macrophages [16]. Interestingly, GcMAF also shown antitumor activities in mice [17] and may be a potential immunotherapeutic reagent for metastatic breast cancer [18]. All these evidence suggest that GC may play an important part during carcinogenesis, alone or in a combination manner with vitamin D.

The GC gene, which coding human GC, is polymorphic. There are two common non-synonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) [Glu416Asp (rs7041) and Thr420Lys (rs4588)] in this gene. Glu416Asp and Thr420Lys have been shown to alter plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D in candidate gene studies [19, 20]. Recently, genome wide association studies (GWAS) also shown that GC rs2282679, which is in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with Glu416Asp, was associated with serum 25(OH)D levels [21, 22]. In the previous reports, selected genetic variants in the GC gene, including Glu416Asp and Thr420Lys, have been investigated in breast cancer [23-25], prostate cancer [26], CRC [27] and basal cell carcinomas [28]. However, to date, there is no systematic evaluation on how common Glu416Asp and Thr420Lys SNPs are involved in development of gastrointestinal cancers in Chinese. Therefore, we specifically examined whether these two non-synonymous SNPs are associated with development of four gastrointestinal cancers (EC, HCC, GCa and CRC) in the current study. In addition, the role of GC haplotypes in development of gastrointestinal cancers was also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Study cohorts

This study consisted of 964 patients with gastrointestinal cancers (237 HCC cases, 289 EC cases, 192 GCa cases and 246 CRC cases) and 1187 healthy controls. HCC, EC, and GCa patients were consecutively recruited between January 2009 and July 2011, at Huaian No. 2 Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu Province, China. CRC patients were recruited between January 2009 and October 2011, at Huaian No. 2 Hospital. Controls were cancer-free individuals selected from a community cancer-screening program for early detection of cancer conducted during the same time period as the patients were collected. Controls were matched to patients on age (± 5 years) and sex. All subjects were ethnic Han Chinese. At recruitment, informed consent was obtained from each subject and each participant was then interviewed to collect the information on demographic characteristics and lifetime history of tobacco use. This study was approved by the institutional Review Board of Huaian No. 2 Hospital.

Polymorphism genotyping

GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys genotypes were examined using PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). In PCR-RFLP genotyping, the primers used for amplifying DNA segments containing either GC Asp416Glu or Thr420Lys were 5'-AGA TCT GAA ATG GCT ATTAT TTT GCA-3'/5'-TTG CCA GTT CCG TGG GTG AG-3’ or 5'-TCT GAA ATG GCT ATT ATT TTG CAT T-3'/5'-TGT TAA CCA GCT TTG CCA GTT AC-3', respectively. The underline nucleotides are mismatch nucleotides introduced to create an Eco147I site or an HpyCH4IV site. Restriction enzyme Eco147I (Fermentas) or HpyCH4IV (New England Biolabs) was used to distinguish GC Asp416Glu or Thr420Lys genotypes, respectively. A 15% random sample was reciprocally tested by direct sequencing, and the reproducibility was 99.9%.

Statistics

Pearson's X2 test was used to examine the differences in demographic variables, smoking status and genotype distributions of GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys polymorphisms between patients and controls. Associations between genotypes and risk of the development of gastrointestinal cancers were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) computed using unconditional logistic regression model. Smokers were considered current smokers if they smoked up to 1 year before the date of cancer diagnosis or if they smoked up to 1 year before the date of the interview for control subjects. Subjects who never smoked or smoked less than 1 year before the date of cancer diagnosis for case patients or the date of interview for control subjects were defined as nonsmokers. All ORs were adjusted for age, sex, or smoking status, where it was appropriate. A P value of less than 0.05 was used as the criterion of statistical significance, and all statistical tests were two-sided. All abovementioned analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 16.0). Haplo.stats [29] was also used to assess the relative effects of GC haplotypes on gastrointestinal cancers and adjusted for sex, age, and smoking status.

Results

Subject characteristics

As shown in Table 1, there were no statistically significant differences in the distributions of sex, age and smoking status between patients and controls, suggesting that the frequency matching was adequate. However, smokers were over-represented in gastrointestinal cancer patients compared with controls (all P < 0.01).

Table 1.

Distribution of selected characteristics among gastrointestinal cancer patients and controls

Hepatocellular carcinoma Esophageal cancer Gastric cancer Colorectal cancer




Variable Cases/Control Pa Cases/Control P* Cases/Control P* Cases/Control P*

237/315 289/337 192/204 246/331
Age (year) 0.702 0.897 0.209 0.377
 <59 121/166 155/179 99/118 134/168
 >59 116/149 134/158 93/86 112/163
Sex 0.587 0.616 0.481 0.420
 Male 189/257 204/244 138/153 185/239
 Female 48/58 85/93 54/51 61/92
Smoking status <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 No 83/177 67/169 51/114 81/183
 Yes 154/138 222/168 141/90 165/148
*

Two-sided x2 test

Genotype distributions of GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys polymorphisms

Genotyping results are shown in Table 2. The allele frequencies for GC 416Glu and 420Lys, respectively, were 0.281 and 0.301 in healthy controls as well as 0.283 and 0.336 in gastrointestinal cancer patients. All observed GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys genotype frequencies in both controls and patients conform to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (PHWE > 0.05), except GC Asp416Glu in the GCa case-control cohort (PHWE = 0.04). Linkage disequilibrium analysis showed that these two SNPs are in strong linkage, with D’ = 1.00 and r2 = 0.18. Distributions of these GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys genotypes were then compared among patients and controls. Frequencies of 416Asp/Asp, Asp/Glu and Glu/Glu genotypes among all gastrointestinal cancer patients were not significantly different from those among controls (x2 = 0.500, P = 0.779; degrees of freedom = 2). Significant difference was observed for 420Thr/Thr, Thr/Lys and Lys/Lys genotypes between gastrointestinal cancer patients and controls (x2 = 10.38, P = 0.006; degrees of freedom = 2). In the stratified analyses, frequencies of GC 420Thr/Thr, Thr/Lys and Lys/Lys genotypes were significantly different among CRC patients and controls (x2 = 15.65, P = 0.0004; degrees of freedom = 2), with the Lys/Lys variant being more prevalent in patients than in controls (13.4% vs. 4.5%).

Table 2.

GC genotype frequencies among patients and controls and their association with risk of gastrointestinal cancers

Cancer type Asp416Glu(rs7041T/G) Thr420Lys (rs4588 C/A)
Genotype Cases/Controlsb 0Ra (95% Cl) P Genotype Cases/Controlsb 0Ra (95% Cl) P
Hepatocellular carcinoma 237/315 237/315
Asp/Asp 117/152 Reference Thr/Thr 101/142 Reference
Asp/Glu 98/139 1.07 (0.75-1.53) 0.697 Thr/Lys 111/148 1.05 (0.73-1.49) 0.808
Glu/Glu 22/24 0.88 (0.64-1.21) 0.432 Lys/Lys 25/25 1.17 (0.86-1.60) 0.310
Ptrendc 0.920 Ptrendc 0.356
Esophageal cancer 289/337 289/337
148 148/188 Reference Thr/Thr 148/159 Reference
119 119/128 0.82 (0.57-1.16) 0.260 Thr/Lys 108/144 0.78(0.55-1.12) 0.181
22 22/21 1.00 (0.69-1.44) 0.997 Lys/Lys 33/34 0.96(0.72-1.28) 0.769
Ptrendc 0.232 Ptrendc 0.616
Gastric cancer 192/204 192/204
Asp/Asp 98/99 Reference Thr/Thr 74/88 Reference
Asp/Glu 86/89 1.11(0.71-1.73) 0.663 Thr/Lys 89/92 1.24(0.78-1.99) 0.367
Glu/Glu 8/16 1.45 (0.89-2.36) 0.133 Lys/Lys 29/24 1.25(0.89-1.75) 0.200
Ptrendc 0.310 Ptrendc 0.249
Colorectal cancer 246/331 246/331
Asp/Asp 123/171 Reference Thr/Thr 113/182 Reference
Asp/Glu 107/132 0.86 (0.65-1.24) 0.472 Thr/Lys 100/134 1.35 (0.92-1.71) 0.269
Glu/Glu 16/28 1.28 (0.67-2.48) 0.484 Lys/Lys 33/15 3.41 (1.85-6.57) 1.01×10-4
Ptrendc 0.956 Ptrendc 0.0009
Total 964/1187 964/1187
Asp/Asp 486/610 Reference Thr/Thr 436/571 Reference
Asp/Glu 410/488 0.97 (0.83-1.13) 0.682 Thr/Lys 408/518 1.07 (0.92-1.25) 0.383
Glu/Glu 68/89 1.02 (0.88-1.17) 0.841 Lys/Lys 120/98 1.15 (1.02-1.30) 0.020
Ptrendc 0.845 Ptrendc 0.013
a

Data were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status where it was appropriate. For all cancer together, the analyses were also adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status;

b

Number of subjects;

c

Tests for trend of odds were 2-sided and based on likelihood ratio tests assuming a multiplicative model.

Association between GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys polymorphisms and gastrointestinal cancer risks

No significant association between GC Asp416Glu or Thr420Lys SNPs and EC, HCC or GCa risk was observed (Ptreand of EC = 0.232 for Asp416Glu or 0.616 for Thr420Lys; Ptreand of HCC = 0.920 for Asp416Glu or 0.356 for Thr420Lys; Ptreand of GCa = 0.310 for Asp416Glu or 0.249 for Thr420Lys) (Table 2). However, there was a significant correlation between the GC Thr420Lys genetic variant and CRC risk (Ptreand = 0.0009) (Table 2). In detail, carriers of GC 420Lys/Lys genotype shown significantly elevated risk to develop CRC compared with 420Thr/Thr carriers (OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.85-6.57, P = 1.01×10-4). Although increased risk in carriers of 420Thr/Lys genotype was also found compared with 420Thr/Thr carriers, the association did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.92-1.71, P = 0.269). No such association existed between CRC and GC Asp416Glu SNP (Ptre and = 0.956) (Table 2). In the combined analysis of all gastrointestinal cancer patients and controls, we found that a 1.15-fold increased risk to develop gastrointestinal cancers in subjects carrying GC 420Lys/Lys genotype compared with 420Thr/ Thr carriers (95% CI = 1.02-1.30, P = 0.020) after adjustment of age, sex, and smoking status (Table 2). However, there was no significant association between GC Asp416Glu polymorphism and gastrointestinal cancer risk (Table 2). We also examined whether there are gene-smoking interactions, but the results were negative (data not shown).

GC Asp416Glu and Thr420Lys haplotypes and gastrointestinal cancer risks

Haplotype analyses shown that, compared with GC Asp416-Thr420 haplotype, a significantly increased gastrointestinal cancer risk was observed in carriers of Asp416-Lys420 haplotype (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.04-1.39, P = 0.015). However, there was no significant association between GC GIu416-Thr420 haplotype and gastrointestinal cancer risk (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.95-1.27, P = 0.273) (Table 3). Considering the haplotype frequency of Glu416-Lys420 was only 0.1% in cases or controls, we did not calculate its OR and 95% CI (Table 3). For CRC, compared with GC Asp416-Thr420 haplotype, a significantly increased gastrointestinal cancer risk was observed in carriers of Asp416-Lys420 haplotype (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.19-2.17, P = 0.002) or Glu416-Thr420 haplotype and gastrointestinal cancer risk (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.08 -1.94, P = 0.023) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Distribution of GC hapiotypes frequencies among patients and controls and their association with gastrointestinal cancers

Haplotypes No. of chromosomes (%) ORa (95% Cl) Pb

Patients Controls
Huaian cohort
Asp416-Thr420 790 (41.0) 900 (37.9) Reference
Glu416-Thr420 542 (28.1) 669 (28.2) 1.11 (0.95-1.27) 0.273
Asp416-Lys420 594 (30.8) 802 (33.8) 1.22 (1.04-1.39) 0.015
GIU416-Lys420 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) NC NC

NC, not calculated.

a

Adjusted for sex, age, and smoking;

b

After 1000 permutation test.

Table 4.

Distribution of GC hapiotypes frequencies among patients and controls and their association with colorectal cancer

Haplotypes No. of chromosomes (%) ORa (95% Cl) Pb

Patients Controls
Huaian cohort
Asp416-Thr420 225 (45.8) 242 (36.5) Reference
Glu416-Thr420 130 (26.5) 194 (29.3) 1.43 (1.08-1.94) 0.023
Asp416-Lys420 136(27.7) 226 (34.2) 1.57 (1.19-2.17) 0.002
GIU416-Lys420 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) NC NC

NC, not calculated.

a

Adjusted for sex, age, and smoking;

b

After 1000 permutation test.

Discussion

In this study, we examined whether GC Asp416Glu or Thr420Lys genetic polymorphisms are associated with risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers. On the basis of analysis of a Chinese Han case-control cohort (964 incident patients with gastrointestinal cancers and 1187 control subjects), we demonstrated that GC Thr420Lys polymorphism has significant impact on the risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers, especially on CRC oncogenesis. Additionally, subjects who carrying GC Asp416-Lys420 haplotype, which contains the GC at-risk 420Lys allele, also shown significantly increased risk to develop gastrointestinal cancers, especially CRC.

GC is a serum glycoprotein that belongs to the albumin family. As a key member in vitamin D metabolism pathway, GC can bind to 25(OH)D and other blood vitamin D sterol metabolites and transports them in circulation to target organs, including gastrointestinal organs. It was found that Glu416Asp and Thr420Lys could alter plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D [19, 20]. Sinotte M et al found that the plasma 25 (OH)D concentration of GC 420Lys/Lys carriers was significantly lower than that of 420Thr/Thr carriers (Crude mean ± SE = 59.0 ± 2.4 vs. 67.2 ± 1.0, P = 0.0016; adjusted mean ± SE = 58.4 ± 2.0 vs. 67.2 ± 0.9, P < 0.0001) [19]. Similar results were observed in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Family Study [20]. GC Thr420Lys was associated with levels of 25(OH) D and 1,25(OH)2D in both Hispanics and African Americans participants at all three study centers [20]. These results suggest that the increased risk of GC 420Lys/Lys carriers to develop gastrointestinal cancers (especially CRC) may be due to their low circulating 25(OH)D levels compared to 420Thr/Thr carriers, since clinically deficient 25(OH)D levels have been associated to increased cancer risk. In addition, the activation of the vitamin D receptor pathway was correlated to increased endocytotic uptakes of the GC-25(OH)D-complex to cancer cells, which in turn leads to anticarcinogenic action of vitamin D [30]. Therefore, it is biologically plausible that subjects carrying 420Lys/ Lys genotype or Asp416-Lys420 haplotype have a lower uptake ability of GC-25(OH)D complex from circulation and, thus, a increased gastrointestinal cancer risk.

In the previous reports, three common phenotypic alleles (haplotypes) have been identified in the GC protein (Gc1s: Glu416-Thr420, Gc1f: Asp416-Thr420, and Gc2: Asp416-Lys420) [31, 32]. These GC haplotypes have been associated with differences in serum 25(OH)D concentration and affinity of GC to vitamin D metabolites. Compared with Asp416-Lys420 haplotype, GC Glu416-Thr420 and Asp416-Thr420 haplotypes were associated with higher levels of serum 25 (0H)D concentration as well as higher affinity of GC to vitamin D metabolites [32-34]. Consistent with these previous findings, we also identified the same three common haplotypes in Chinese population and found that Asp416-Lys420 haplotype was associated with significantly increased gastrointestinal cancer risk. This observation is biologically plausible since the Asp416-Lys420 haplotype carrier may be in vitamin D deficient status and their gastrointestinal cells more easily undergo malignant transformation compared to carriers of these other two common haploptypes.

In summary, our study demonstrates that GC Thr420Lys genetic polymorphism and Asp416-Lys420 haplotype are associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal cancers in Chinese Han population. However, as a hospital-based case-control study, our study may have selection bias and/or systematic error because the cases were recruited from a hospital and the controls were recruited from the community. Therefore, independent studies are needed to validate our findings.

References

  • 1.Garland CF, Garland FC. Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol. 1980;9:227–231. doi: 10.1093/ije/9.3.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bostick RM, Potter JD, Sellers TA, McKenzie DR, Kushi LH, Folsom AR. Relation of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy food intake to incidence of colon cancer among older women. The Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1302–1317. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martinez ME, Marshall JR, Sampliner R, Wilkinson J, Alberts DS. Calcium, vitamin D, and risk of adenoma recurrence (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:213–220. doi: 10.1023/a:1015032215779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martfnez ME, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Speizer FE, Wing A, Willett WC. Calcium, vitamin D, and the occurrence of colorectal cancer among women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1375–1382. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.19.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giovannucci E, Liu Y, Rimm EB, Hollis BW, Fuchs CS, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:451–459. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pritchard RS, Baron JA, Gerhardsson de Verdier M. Dietary calcium, vitamin D, and the risk of colorectal cancer in Stockholm, Sweden. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:897–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marcus PM, Newcomb PA. The association of calcium and vitamin D, and colon and rectal cancer in Wisconsin women. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:788–793. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.5.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kampman E, Slattery ML, Caan B, Potter JD. Calcium, vitamin D, sunshine exposure, dairy products and colon cancer risk (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:459–466. doi: 10.1023/a:1008914108739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lipworth L, Rossi M, McLaughlin JK, Negri E, Talamini R, Levi F, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C. Dietary vitamin D and cancers of the oral cavity and esophagus. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1576–1581. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ikezaki S, Nishikawa A, Furukawa F, Tanakamura Z, Kim HC, Mori H, Takahashi M. Chemopreventive effects of 24R.25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, a vitamin D3 derivative, on glandular stomach carcinogenesis induced in rats by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and sodium chloride. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2767–2770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.La Vecchia C, Ferraroni M, D'Avanzo B, Decarli A, Franceschi S. Selected micronutrient intake and the risk of gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994;3:393–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jourdan JL, Akhter J, Bowrey P, Pourgholami M, Morris DL. Hepatic intra-arterial injection of lipiodol-l,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 for hepato-cellular carcinoma in rats. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:2739–2744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pourgholami MH, Morris DL. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in lipiodol for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: cellular, animal and clinical studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89-90:513–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pourgholami MH, Akhter J, Lu Y, Morris DL. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of liver cancer cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cancer Lett. 2000;151:97–102. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(99)00416-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yamamoto N, Kumashiro R. Conversion of vitamin D3 binding protein (group-specific component) to a macrophage activating factor by the stepwise action of B-galactosidase of B cells and sialidase of T cells. J Immunol. 1993;151:2794–2802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamamoto N, Naraparaju VR. Role of vitamin D3-binding protein in activation of mouse macrophages. J Immunol. 1996;157:1744–1749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kisker O, Onizuka S, Becker CM, Fannon M, Flynn E, D'Amato R, Zetter B, Folkman J, Ray R, Swamy N, Pirie-Shepherd S. Vitamin D binding proteinmacrophage activating factor (DBP-maf) inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth in mice. Neoplasia. 2003;5:32–40. doi: 10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80015-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamamoto N, Suyama H, Yamamoto N, Ushijima N. Immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer patients with vitamin D-binding protein-derived macrophage activating factor (GcMAF) Int J Cancer. 2008;122:461–467. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sinotte M, Diorio C, Berube S, Pollak M, Brisson J. Genetic polymorphisms of the vitamin D binding protein and plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:634–640. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Engelman CD, Fingerlin TE, Langefeld CD, Hicks PJ, Rich SS, Wagenknecht LE, Bowden DW, Norris JM. Genetic and environmental determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in Hispanic and African Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3381–3388. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ahn J, Yu K, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Simon KC, McCullough ML, Gallicchio L, Jacobs EJ, Ascherio A, Helzlsouer K, Jacobs KB, Li Q, Weinstein SJ, Purdue M, Virtamo J, Horst R, Wheeler W, Chanock S, Hunter DJ, Hayes RB, Kraft P, Albanes D. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2739–2745. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang TJ, Zhang F, Richards JB, Kestenbaum B, van Meurs JB, Berry D, Kiel DP, Streeten EA, Ohlsson C, Koller DL, Peltonen L, Cooper JD, O'Reilly PF, Houston DK, Glazer NL, Vandenput L, Peacock M, Shi J, Rivadeneira F, McCarthy MI, Anneli P, de Boer IH, Mangino M, Kato B, Smyth DJ, Booth SL, Jacques PF, Burke GL, Goodarzi M, Cheung CL, Wolf M, Rice K, Goltzman D, Hidiroglou N, Ladouceur M, Wareham NJ, Hocking LJ, Hart D, Arden NK, Cooper C, Malik S, Fraser WD, Hartikainen AL, Zhai G, Macdonald HM, Forouhi NG, Loos RJ, Reid DM, Hakim A, Dennison E, Liu Y, Power C, Stevens HE, Jaana L, Vasan RS, Soranzo N, Bojunga J, Psaty BM, Lorentzon M, Foroud T, Harris TB, Hofman A, Jansson JO, Cauley JA, Uitterlinden AG, Gibson Q, Järvelin MR, Karasik D, Siscovick DS, Econs MJ, Kritchevsky SB, Florez JC, Todd JA, Dupuis J, Hyppönen E, Spector TD. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376:180–188. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60588-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McCullough ML, Stevens VL, Diver WR, Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Bostick RM, Thun MJ, Calle EE. Vitamin D pathway gene polymorphisms, diet, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: a nested case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R9. doi: 10.1186/bcr1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abbas S, Linseisen J, Slanger T, Kropp S, Mutschelknauss EJ, Flesch-Janys D, Chang-Claude J. The Gc2 allele of the vitamin D binding protein is associated with a decreased postmenopausal breast cancer risk, independent of the vitamin D status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1339–1343. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson LN, Cotterchio M, Cole DE, Knight JA. Vitamin D-Related Genetic Variants, Interactions with Vitamin D Exposure, and Breast Cancer Risk among Caucasian Women in Ontario. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1708–1717. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kidd LC, Paltoo DN, Wang S, Chen W, Akereyeni F, Isaacs W, Ahaghotu C, Kittles R. Sequence variation within the 5’ regulatory regions of the vitamin D binding protein and receptor genes and prostate cancer risk. Prostate. 2005;64:272–282. doi: 10.1002/pros.20204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Poynter JN, Jacobs ET, Figueiredo JC, Lee WH, Conti DV, Campbell PT, Levine AJ, Limburg P, Le Marchand L, Cotterchio M, Newcomb PA, Potter JD, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Duggan DJ, Baron JA, Haile RW. Genetic variation in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the vitamin D-binding protein (GC) and risk for colorectal cancer: results from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:525–536. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Flohil SC, de Vries E, van Meurs JB, Fang Y, Strieker BH, Uitterlinden AG, Nijsten T. Vitamin D-binding protein polymorphisms are not associated with development of (multiple) basal cell carcinomas. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:1103–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:425–434. doi: 10.1086/338688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Welsh J. Vitamin D and prevention of breast cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28:1373–1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Braun A, Bichlmaier R, Cleve H. Molecular analysis of the gene for the human vitamin-D-binding protein (group-specific component): allelic differences of the common genetic GC types. Hum Genet. 1992;89:401–406. doi: 10.1007/BF00194311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arnaud J, Constans J. Affinity differences for vitamin D metabolites associated with the genetic isoforms of the human serum carrier protein (DBP) Hum Genet. 1993;92:183–188. doi: 10.1007/BF00219689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lauridsen AL, Vestergaard P, Nexo E. Mean serum concentration of vitamin D-binding protein (Gc globulin) is related to the Gc phenotype in women. Clin Chem. 2001;47:753–756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lauridsen AL, Vestergaard P, Hermann AP, Brot C, Heickendorff L, Mosekilde L, Nexo E. Plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D are related to the phenotype of Gc (vitamin D-binding protein): a cross-sectional study on 595 early postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;77:15–22. doi: 10.1007/s00223-004-0227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES