SUMMARY
The present study examined the clinico-pathological profile of sinonasal masses in patients attending an Ear Nose Throat clinic of a rural tertiary care hospital of western Maharashtra in India, between May 2007 to June 2009. During the study period, 112 patients presented with sinonasal masses (male 68, female 44; age group 8-70 years). Nasal polyploid masses were non-neoplastic in 80 (71.4%) subjects, and neoplastic in 32 (28.6%) cases. Nasal obstruction was the most common (97.3%) presenting complaint, followed by rhinorrhoea (49.1%), hyposmia (31.25%), intermittent epistaxis (17.9%), headache (16.9%), facial swelling (11.6%) and eye-related symptoms (10.7%). The most common site of origin of polyploid masses was the middle meatus (54.4%) followed by the lateral wall of the nasal cavity (16.1%) and superior meatus (10.7%). Unilateral nasal masses was present in 47.7% patients, while the remaining patients had bilateral nasal masses. Allergic (62.5%) and inflammatory (25%) polyps were the most common non-neoplastic mass. Haemangioma (47.3%) and inverted papilloma (36.8%) were most common benign neoplastic mass; 92.3% of all malignant masses were squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery was the major mode of treatment. It included Caldwell-Luc operation (7.1%), polypectomy (17.8%), excision of mass (25.0%) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (44.6%). Malignancies were treated with radiotherapy.
KEY WORDS: Sino nasal mass, Polyp, Nasal obstruction, Squamous cell carcinoma, FESS
RIASSUNTO
In questo studio vengono presi in esame gli aspetti clinico-patologici delle masse nasosinusali in pazienti seguiti presso la Clinica Otorinolaringoiatrica del centro di cura ospedaliero di Maharashtra in India, nel periodo compreso tra il maggio 2007 ed il giugno 2009. Durante il periodo di studio una massa nasosinusale è stata riscontrata in 112 pazienti (68 maschi, 44 femmine; range di età 8-70 anni). Masse naso sinusali di tipo non neoplastico sono state riscontrate in 80 pazienti (71,4%) mentre quelle di tipo neoplastico in 32 pazienti (28,6%). L'ostruzione nasale è stato il sintomo più comunemente riferito (97,32%), seguito da rinorrea (49,1%), iposmia (31,25%), epistassi intermittente (17,85%), cefalea (16,87%), tumefazione del volto (11,6%) e sintomi oculari (10,71%). La sede di origine più comune delle masse di tipo polipoide è stato il meato medio (54,46%), seguito dalla parete laterale della cavità nasale (16.07%) e dal meato superiore (10,7%). Nel 47,74% dei pazienti sono state osservate masse naso sinusali unilaterali, mentre nei restanti casi le lesioni erano bilaterali. I polipi su base allergica (62,5%) ed infiammatoria (25%) rappresentavano le masse di tipo non neoplastico più comunemente osservate. Gli emangiomi (47,3%) e i papillomi invertiti (36,8%) rappresentavano le masse neoplastiche benigne osservate più di frequente. Il carcinoma a cellule squamose ha rappresentato il 92,3% di tutte le masse neoplastiche maligne. La chirurgia è stata la scelta principale per il trattamento dei pazienti, ed in particolare l'intervento di Caldwell-Luc (7,1%), la polipectomia (17,8%), l'escissione della massa (25%) e la chirurgia endoscopica sinusale funzionale (44,6%). Le neoplasie maligne sono state trattate con radioterapia.
Introduction
The nose is the most prominent part of the face with substantial aesthetic and functional significance. It is one of the few organs of body invested with an aura of emotional and cultural importance. Anatomical location of the nose and it passage have been regarded as the direct avenue to the brain, man's source of intelligence and spirituality.
Nasal masses are common finding in an ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat) outpatient department. Most patients present with complaints of nasal obstruction 1. Other symptoms include nasal discharge, epistaxis and disturbances of smell. A sinonasal mass can have various differential diagnoses. They may be congenital, inflammatory, neoplastic (benign or malignant) or traumatic in nature. A congenital nasal mass may present intranasally, extranasally, or as external nasal mass with or without nasal obstruction 2. Congenital masses are predominantly mid line swellings and include dermoids, glioma and encephaloceles as common diagnoses 3. Polyps are a common cause of nasal obstruction in adults with a prevalence of about 4% in the general population 4.
Polyp is a general term used to describe any mass of tissue that bulges or projects downwards from the normal surface and is macroscopically visible. It is also known as prolapsed pedunculated mucosa. This condition is wellknown with little improvement in its treatment modality, although it is a common condition; the exact aetiopathological correlation is still unknown. Hippocrates gave a graphic description of nasal polypoidal masses as early as 460-370 B.C., and can thus be considered the "Father of Rhinology". Forestus (1522-1597 A.D.) described a case of a woman whose nasal polyps, according to him, were due to forcing of mucous membrane into the nose, which he attributed to her carrying heavy weights on her head.
The trend and tradition of a clinical entity changes with time. Tandon et al. 5 and Dasgupta et al. 6 devoted considerable effort in the study of sinonasal masses in the Indian population. However, to date an analysis of the sinonasal masses in the rural population of India has been lacking. The present investigation was undertaken to study the clinico-pathological profile of sinonasal masses in a rural tertiary care hospital of western Maharashtra, India.
Material and methods
The study was carried out at Rural Medical College and Pravara Rural Hospital, Loni, which is a tertiary care hospital in western Maharashtra, India. The ENT department of the hospital predominantly receives patients from Ahmednagar and Nashik districts. All patients diagnosed with sinonasal masses during the period from May 2007 to June 2009 were included. The criteria for selection of cases were mainly based on history and clinical examination. Detailed history was taken considering the patients' complaints, mainly nasal obstruction, mass in the nose, epistaxis, rhinorrhoea, hyposmia and deformity of nose and face. Occupational history, personal habits and socioeconomic status of patients were documented. Socioeconomic status was assessed according to the modified BG Prasad classification based on Consumer Price Index of April 2006 7 8. Clinical examinations were carried out as per standard protocols. Appropriate radiological and laboratory investigations were done as appropriate. Biopsy was taken from all cases for histopathological examination to confirm diagnosis. Earlier workers used different terms for the same pathological entity and the same term for lesions of different types. World Health Organization classification (1978, 1991) 9 10 was adopted to describe the lesion. Patients were treated either by pharmacotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy or a combination as appropriate. Patients were asked for regular follow up. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee of the medical college. Data was analysed using Microsoft Office Excel 2007.
Results
During the study period, 112 patients presented with sinonasal masses, and confirmed by various investigations. The socio-demographic details of the study population are given in Table I.
Table I.
N (%) | |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 68 (60.7) |
Female | 44 (39.2) |
Total | 112 (100) |
Age Group | |
< 10 years | 11 (9.8) |
11-20 years | 24 (21.4) |
21-30 years | 22 (19.6) |
31-40 years | 23 (20.5) |
41-50 years | 15 (13.4) |
51-60 years | 6 (5.4) |
61-70 years | 11 (9.8) |
Mean Age (in years), (SD) | 31.2 (7.4) |
Education | |
Graduate and above | 8 (7.1) |
Intermediate/Matriculation | 12 (10.7) |
Secondary | 20 (17.8) |
Primary | 32 (28.6) |
Illiterate | 40 (35.7) |
Occupation | |
Farmer | 45 (40.2) |
Labourer | 37 (33) |
Business | 3 (2.7) |
Service | 5 (4.5) |
Student | 17 (15.1) |
Others | 5 (4.5) |
Socioeconomic Status | |
Upper | 0 (0) |
Upper middle | 0 (0) |
Middle | 8 (7.1) |
Lower middle | 67 (59.8) |
Lower | 37 (33) |
Dietary Habit | |
Vegetarian | 45 (40.2) |
Non-vegetarian | 67 (59.8) |
Religion | |
Hindu | 63 (56.2) |
Muslim | 35 (31.3) |
Christian | 7 (6.2) |
Others | 7 (6.2) |
Nasal polyploidal masses were non-neoplastic in 80 (71.4%) study subjects, and neoplastic in 32 (28.6%) patients (Table II). The age range of the patients were 8 to 70 years. Non-neoplastic polypoid masses were common in the age group 11 to 40 years. Benign neoplastic polypoid masses were common in the age range of 11 to 50 years, while malignant neoplastic polypoid masses were more common after the third decade of life (Table III).
Table II.
Type of mass | Male | Female | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Non-neoplastic | 46 | 34 | 80 |
Neoplastic | |||
Benign | 12 | 07 | 19 |
Malignant | 10 | 3 | 13 |
Total | 68 | 44 | 112 |
Table III.
Age (years) |
Non-neoplastic mass |
Neoplastic mass | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Benign | Malignant | |||
< 10 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
11-20 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 24 |
21-30 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 22 |
31-40 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 23 |
41-50 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 15 |
51-60 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
61-70 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Total | 80 | 19 | 13 | 112 |
Nasal obstruction was the most common (97.3% cases) presenting complaint. Rhinorrhoea (49.1%), hyposmia (31.3%), intermittent epistaxis (17.9%), headache (16.9%), swelling over face (11.6%) and eye related symptoms (10.7%) were other common symptoms. Facial pain (3.9%) and external nasal deformity (1.8%) were demonstrated in a minority of patients. Unilateral nasal masses were observed in 47.7% patients, while the remaining patients had bilateral nasal masses. All the benign as well as malignant polypoid masses presented unilaterally, with the exception one benign neoplastic mass. Among non-neoplastic polypoid nasal masses, 69.4% were multiple and 30.6% presented as a single mass. All benign and malignant nasal polypoid masses were found to be single except in one malignant case (Table IV). The most common site of origin of the polyploid masses was the middle meatus (54.5%) followed by the lateral wall of the nasal cavity (16.1%) and superior meatus (10.7%). The study further revealed that of 70 cases of true nasal polyps, 60 (85.1%) originated from the middle meatus and 10 (14.3%) from the superior meatus. Mucoid discharge was found to be common in non-neoplastic nasal polypoid masses. All patients with malignant neoplastic polypoid masses presented with blood stained discharge or intermittent epistaxis (Table V).
Table IV.
Non-neoplastic mass |
Neoplastic mass | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Benign | Malignant | |||
Laterality | ||||
Unilateral | 23 | 18 | 13 | 54 |
Bilateral | 57 | 1 | 0 | 58 |
Total | 80 | 19 | 13 | 112 |
Number | ||||
Single | 22 | 18 | 12 | 52 |
Multiple | 50 | 0 | 1 | 51 |
Total | 72* | 18** | 13 | 103 |
Cases of rhinoscleroma are not considered;
a case of angiofibroma is not considered.
Table V.
Non-neoplastic mass | Neoplastic mass | ||
---|---|---|---|
Benign | Malignant | ||
Mucoid | 27 | 02 | - |
Mucopurulent | 15 | 01 | - |
Foul smelling | 02 | - | - |
Blood-stained/intermittent epistaxis | 03 | 01 | 13 |
Histopathological examination revealed that 44.6% (n = 50) of the polyps to be allergic in nature (ethmoidal polyp), while 17.8% (n = 20) were inflammatory (antrochoanal polyp). Rhinoscleroma and rhinosporodiosis were the other two non neoplastic lesions confirmed by histopathological investigation (Table VI). All patients with rhinoscleroma were in the third decade of life with a male-female ratio of 3:1 (6 males, 2 females). Among benign neoplastic lesions, haemangioma was the most common (n = 9) followed by inverted papilloma (n = 7). Mucocele and angiofibroma were only seen in 2 and 1 cases, respectively. Squamous cell carcinoma represented 92.3% all sinonasal malignancies (Table VI). Surgery was the major mode of treatment in all cases. It included Caldwell-Luc operation (7.1%), polypectomy (17.8%), excision of mass (25.0%) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (44.6%). Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were considered as the treatment of choice in 17.8% of patients. Among 20 cases of antrochoanal polyp, 12 (60%) patients were treated with polypectomy by avulsion and 8 (40%) had undergone polypectomy with the Caldwell-Luc procedure. All 50 patients with bilateral ethmoidal polyps underwent polypectomy/FESS followed by steroid therapy. Only one patient developed recurrence of bilateral ethmoidal polyp. Malignancies were treated with radiotherapy.
Table VI.
N (%) | |
---|---|
Non neoplastic mass | |
Allergic polyp | 50 (62.5) |
Inflammatory polyp | 20 (25) |
Rhinoscleroma | 8 (10) |
Rhinosporodiosis | 2 (2.5) |
Total | 80 (100) |
Benign neoplastic mass | |
Haemangioma | 9 (47.3) |
Inverted papilloma | 7 (36.8) |
Mucocele | 2 (10.5) |
Angiofibroma | 1 (5.3) |
Total | 19 (100) |
Malignant neoplastic mass | |
Squamous cell carcinoma | 12 (92.3) |
Adenocarcinoma | 1 (7.6) |
Total | 13 (100) |
Discussion
Sinonasal masses had predilection for males, demonstrating a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. It was higher (male-tofemale ratio of 1.7:1) in the study by Zafar et al. 11 from India, while a study from Nigeria 12 revealed an opposite ratio showing female preponderance (M:F ratio of 1:1.2). A British review of nasal polyposis reported a ratio at 2:1 (M:F) 4. The 2nd to 4th decades of life are the most vulnerable period for development of sinonasal masses. Bakari et al. 12 had reported a peak incidence of 33 years, while for Zafar et al. 11 the mean age of presentation was 22.5 years. Malignancies have been reported generally after the fourth decade of life.
Nasal polyps result from chronic inflammation of the nasal and sinus mucous membranes and are the most common tumours of the nasal cavity. Their exact pathogenesis is not known, however a strong association with allergy, infection, asthma and aspirin sensitivity has been implicated 4 13. We found 71.4% of the sinonasal masses to be non-neoplastic. Such a high proportion of non-neoplastic lesions has been reported in previous studies 11 12 14. Nasal polyp was the most common non-neoplastic mass and was similarly documented by those authors. True nasal polyps are subdivided into allergic nasal polyps, showing abundant eosinophils in the stroma in addition to inflammatory cells, whereas in the other type viz. inflammatory nasal polyps, there is a paucity of eosinophils. Ethmoidal and antrochoanal polyps are generally allergic and inflammatory in nature, respectively. This trend was also seen considering the two forms of the polyps in the present study. The incidence of rhinoscleroma (10%) was much higher than reported by another similar study 11, while no case was reported by Nigerian 12 or Nepali 15 authors. Rhinosporodiosis, an endemic disease in India, Sri Lanka and a few African nations 16 was also diagnosed and treated. We found 2 cases of rhinosporiodosis, while Pradhananga et al. 15 had encountered only one case during their twoyear study period. Rhinoscleroma and rhinosporodiosis are rare entities in the west (Europe and America) and scarcely documented among those who have never travelled to endemic areas 17 18.
Haemangioma is not regularly seen in the nasal cavity, though if it occurs, is predominantly capillary and is found attached to the nasal septum 19. Cavernous haemangioma is rarely seen in the sinonasal tract 20. Among the benign lesions, capillary haemangioma (47.3%) was most common lesion in our study. All cases were found to be arising from the cartilaginous part of the nasal septum. This finding corresponds to the observation of Pradhananga et al. 15. A clinicopathological study of haemangioma from Japan reported an usual origin of capillary type from the nasal septum and of the cavernous variety from the lateral nasal wall 21. Inverted papillomas are comparatively rare, but this morphological variant is the most commonly encountered lesion of all sinonasal papillomas 22. The other two morphological forms are exophytic (everted) squamous cell papilloma and cylindric cell papilloma. Inverted papilloma formed 36.8% of all benign neoplastic masses, which was marginally higher from the findings of Humayun et al. 1and Bakari et al. 12. Though it is a benign lesion but clinically it behaves as a potentially notorious pathology if not treated adequately and followed adequately. The rate of malignant transformation may be as high as 11% 23. Inverted papilloma was associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal cavity in 6 (21.4%) of the 28 cases studied by Califano et al. in USA 24. Mucocele and angifibroma were evident in 2 and 1 patients, respectively, while Pradhananga et al. 15 reported 9 cases of angiofibroma over a period of two years in Nepal. Juvenile angiofibroma forms 0.5% of all head and neck tumours in Europe 25.
Malignancy of sinonasal tract is rare 26. The maxillary sinus is the most common site of origin 27, while the most common histological type is squamous cell carcinoma 28. It is rarely encountered before the 4th decade of life. It formed 11.6% of all lesions and 40.6% of neoplastic masses in our study. Histological investigation revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 92.3% (n = 12) of all malignant neoplastic sinonasal masses, and only 1 slide was identified to be adenocarcinoma. Svane-Knudsen et al. have similarly reported squamous cell carcinoma to be the most commonly encountered malignancy of sinonasal tract in Denmark 29. Pradhananga et al. 15 reported 6.3% of their sinonasal masses to be malignant, while for Fasunla et al. 27 malignant sinonasal tumours constituted 59.4% of the 138 sinonasal neoplasms seen. The highest numbers of cases were seen in the age group 61-70 years with 7 study subjects. A Polish study reported 71-80 years to be the most commonly affected age group for malignancies of the sinonasal tract 30. All the tumours originated in the maxillary sinus (100%), eroding the lateral wall of nasal cavity.
The common presentation of the sinonasal masses were nasal obstruction, (97.3% cases), rhinorrhoea (49.1%), hyposmia (31.3%) and headache (16.9%). These findings compare favourably with other studies 1 12 14 15. Intermittent epistaxis was noticed in 17.9% of cases with 12 of the malignant masses showing it as a regular feature. External deformity of nose and cheek is more common in neoplastic polypoid lesions, but can also be seen in long standing non-neoplastic polyps developing at an early age. Unilateral presentation was seen in 48.2% of cases. This was in contrast with the observations of Bakari et al. 12 where bilateral sinonasal masses were seen in 44.7% of cases, and unilateral lesions in 55.3% of patients. Non-neoplastic inflammatory polyps were usually unilateral and single, while allergic polyps were usually bilateral and multiple in agreement with the analysis of Frosini et al. 31.
Histopathological examination is conclusive in diagnosing the polypoid lesions, describing both aetiology and cellular details. It is the only means of determining the nature of the disease, i.e. inflammatory or neoplastic. Radiological investigations may also help in understanding the type of pathology, extension of lesion and associated sinus pathology. Most of non-neoplastic and benign neoplastic nasal masses require surgical excision, while malignant neoplastic nasal masses require wide surgical excision, radiotherapy or chemotherapy either alone or in combination. Regular follow-up is necessary for early detection of recurrence or metastases. The outcome for malignant lesions is relatively poor and associated with late diagnosis, difficult surgical anatomy and a lack of effective adjuvant modalities of treatment 32. Topically applied corticosteroids have a favourable effect on symptoms 33. However, corticosteroids are only helpful in allergic conditions. FESS was the most commonly used surgical intervention (44.6%) followed by excision of the mass (25.0%). Polypectomy and Caldwell-Luc procedure for nasal polyposis are certainly associated with a risk of recurrence. FESS offers a definite advantage over other procedures and is now the preferred modality 34. Complete surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective and safe approach in the treatment of sinonasal cancer and associated with better survival 35 36. However, radiotherapy was the only mode of treatment offered to patients in our clinic.
Conclusions
Sinonasal masses have various differential diagnoses. Malignancy should be distinguished from non-malignant lesions. Benign conditions show a peak during second to fourth decade of life, while malignancy is generally observed only after the 4th decade. Polyps are the most common benign lesion, while squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour of the sinonasal tract. Nasal obstruction is the most common symptom. Medical management is often not adequate and has a limited role. Surgery is the treatment of choice for benign lesions, while a combination of surgery and radiotherapy is helpful in malignant conditions.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Dr. K. J. Shinde, Professor and Head, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, for his guidance and encouragement. We are also thankful to Pravara Medical Trust, Loni, Maharashtra, India for providing permission and lending support to the project.
References
- 1.Humayun AHM, Zahurul Huq AHM, Ahmed SMT, et al. Clinicopathological study of sinonasal masses. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;16:15–22. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harley EH. Pediatric congenital nasal masses. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;70:28–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valencia MP, Castillo M. Congenital and acquired lesions of the nasal septum: a practical guide for differential diagnosis. Radio Graphics. 2008;28:205–223. doi: 10.1148/rg.281075049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hedman J, Kaprio J, Poussa T, et al. Prevalence of asthma, aspirin intolerance, nasal polyposis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a population-based study. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:717–722. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.4.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tondon PL, Gulati J, Mehta N. Histological study of polypoidal lesions in the nasal cavity. Indian J Otolaryngol. 1971;13:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dasgupta A, Ghosh RN, Mukherjee C. Nasal polyps-histopathological spectrum. Indian J Otorhynolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;49:32–37. doi: 10.1007/BF02991708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Economic Survey 2000-2001. Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Economic Division, New Delhi.
- 8.Gupta MC, Mahajan BK. The textbook of preventive and social medicine. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2003. pp. 117–118. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH. Histological typing of upper respiratory tract tumors. International Histological Typing of Tumors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1978. pp. 32–33. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH. Histological typing of tumours of the upper respiratory tract and ear. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zafar U, Khan N, Afroz N, et al. Clinicopathological study of non-neoplastic lesions of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51:26–29. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.40386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bakari A, Afolabi OA, Adoga AA, et al. Clinico-pathological profile of sinonasal masses: an experience in national ear care center Kaduna, Nigeria. BMC Research Notes. 2010;3:186–186. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Casale M, Pappacena M, Potena M, et al. Nasal polyposis: from pathogenesis to treatment, an update. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2011;10:158–163. doi: 10.2174/187152811795564055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dasgupta A, Ghosh RN, Mukherjee C. Nasal polyps - Histopathologic spectrum. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;49:32–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02991708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pradhananga RB, Adhikari P, Thapa NM, et al. Overview of nasal masses. J Inst Med. 2008;30:13–16. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morelli L, Polce M, Piscioli F, et al. Human nasal rhinosporidiosis: an Italian case report. Diagnostic Pathology. 2006;1:25–25. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-1-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arseculeratne SN. Recent advances in rhinosporidiosis and Rhinosporidium seeberi. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2002;20:119–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bailhache A, Dehesdin D, François A, et al. Rhinoscleroma of the sinusesa. Rhinology. 2008;46:338–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Webb CG, Porter G, Sissons GRJ. Cavernous hemangioma of the nasal bones: an alternative management option. J Laryngol Otol. 2000;114:287–289. doi: 10.1258/0022215001905364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Archontaki M, Stamou AK, Hajiioannou JK, et al. Cavernous haemangioma of the left nasal cavity. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:309–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Iwata N, Hattori K, Tsujimura T. Hemangioma of the nasal cavity: a clinicopathological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2002;29:335–339. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(02)00028-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Syrjänen KJ. HPV infections in benign and malignant sinonasal lesions. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:174–181. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.3.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barnes L, Tse LLY, Hunt JL. Schneiderian papillomas. In: Barnes L, Eveson JV, Reichart P, et al., editors. World health organization classification of tumors. Lyon: Pathology of the Head and Neck Tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. pp. 28–32. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Califano J, Koch W, Sidransky D, et al. Inverted sinonasal papilloma: a molecular genetic appraisal of its putative status as a precursor to squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2000:156333–156337. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64734-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinology. 2010;48((Suppl 22)):1–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zimmer LA, Carrau RL. Neoplasms of the nose and paranasal sinuses. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newland SD, editors. Head & Neck Surgery - Otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fasunla AJ, Lasisi AO. Sinonasal malignancies: a 10-year review in a tertiary health institution. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99:1407–1410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weymuller EA, Gal TJ. Neoplasms of the nasal cavity. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, editors. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck surgery. 4th ed. Mosby: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Svane-Knudsen V, Jorgensen KE, Hansen O, et al. Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a series of 115 patients. Rhinology. 1998;36:12–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zyłka S, Bień S, Kamiński B, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of the sinonasal malignancies. Otolaryngol Pol. 2008;62:436–441. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(08)70287-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Frosini P, Picarella G, Campora E. Antrochoanal polyp: analysis of 200 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29:21–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Resto VA, Deschler DG. Sinonasal malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;37:473–487. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(03)00159-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dassonville C, Bonfils P, Momas I, et al. Nasal inflammation induced by a common cold: comparison between controls and patients with nasal polyposis under topical steroid therapy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:78–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yaman H, Yilmaz S, Karali E, et al. Evaluation and management of antrochoanal polyps. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;3:110–114. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.2.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jansen EP, Keus RB, Hilgers FJ, et al. Does the combination of radiotherapy and debulking surgery favor survival in paranasal sinus carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:27–35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoppe BS, Stegman LD, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Treatment of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer with modern radiotherapy techniques in the postoperative setting-- the MSKCC experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:691–702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]