Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Feb;194(4):897–898. doi: 10.1128/JB.06495-11

Genome Sequence of Enterobacter cloacae subsp. dissolvens SDM, an Efficient Biomass-Utilizing Producer of Platform Chemical 2,3-Butanediol

Youqiang Xu a, Ailong Wang a, Fei Tao b, Fei Su b, Hongzhi Tang b, Cuiqing Ma a,, Ping Xu a,b,
PMCID: PMC3272950  PMID: 22275097

Abstract

Enterobacter cloacae subsp. dissolvens SDM has an extraordinary characteristic of biomass utilization for 2,3-butanediol production. Here we present a 4.9-Mb assembly of its genome. The key genes for regulation and metabolism of 2,3-butanediol production were annotated, which could provide further insights into the molecular mechanism of high-yield production of 2,3-butanediol.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The energy crisis of recent years shows the shortage of nonrenewable resources such as crude oil (4, 13). With growing demand for nonrenewable resources and their shortage, biological production of fuels and chemicals from renewable resources has gained great attention (13). 2,3-Butanediol (2,3-BD) is a useful chemical that can be produced from renewable resources (3, 15). It is an important platform compound, which could be used to produce a series of useful products, such as methyl ethyl ketone and 1,3-butadiene (2, 4). Microbial production of 2,3-BD has a long history (over 100 years) (4). Various bacteria were used to produce 2,3-BD (6, 7, 9, 15, 16). However, there has been only one report related to 2,3-BD production by an Enterobacter strain, and the production yield was very low (14). The Enterobacter cloacae subsp. dissolvens SDM (CGMCC 4230) strain isolated from soil samples is a potential industrial candidate for 2,3-BD production (6), which could produce more than 100 g liter−1 2,3-BD from glucose. Moreover, strain SDM has an extraordinary characteristic of biomass utilization for 2,3-BD production. This strain could efficiently use pentose sugars, xylose, and arabinose from lignocellulose and other cheap biomass, such as cassava, one of the most efficient crops in terms of carbohydrate production (11) for 2,3-BD production (unpublished results).

Here we determined a draft genome sequence of strain SDM. The genome sequence was determined by 454 genome sequencer (454 GS FLX) (10). The genome sequence contains 286,872 reads with an average length of 356 bp at more than 20-fold coverage with the G+C content of 55.1%. The reads were assembled using the Newbler Assembler (454 Life Science) into 168 large contigs (>500 bp) with a length of 4,923,170 bp. The genome sequence was annotated by the RAST server (1). tRNAs were predicted by tRNAscan-SE v.1.23 (8), and rRNAs were found with the RNAmmer 1.2 (5).

The genome sequence of strain SDM contains 4,539 protein-coding sequences (CDSs). Three rRNAs and 53 tRNAs were identified. Seventeen CDSs for the metabolism of pentose sugars from biomass are annotated, which are related to the complete pentose metabolic pathway, including 2 subpathways of phosphoketolase and transketolase/transaldolase. This metabolism is important for pentose utilization in the industrial application. In addition, there are 712 CDSs for utilization of other carbohydrates, indicating that strain SDM may have a wide substrate spectrum. The sequence contains the complete operon (2 CDSs) and key coding genes (2 CDSs) for 2,3-BD metabolism, which could provide further insights into efficient biomass utilization for the production of 2,3-BD. The genome sequence also contains a series of membrane transport systems, including 56 CDSs involved in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. The ABC transporters play important roles in not only accumulating compatible solutes and substrates but also excreting unwanted products (12). It may be an important reason for the high-yield production of 2,3-BD.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The whole-genome shotgun sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number AGSY00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, with accession number AGSY01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Huajun Zheng and his colleagues for genome sequencing performed at the Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000014, 31070062, and 30821005) and the Chinese National Program for High Technology Research and Development (2011AA02A207).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Aziz RK, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystem technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Celińska E, Grajek W. 2009. Biotechnological production of 2,3-butanediol—current state and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 27:715–725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ji XJ, et al. 2009. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella oxytoca using a two-stage agitation speed control strategy. Bioresour. Technol. 100:3410–3414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ji XJ, Huang H, Ouyang PK. 2011. Microbial 2,3-butanediol production: a state-of-the-art review. Biotechnol. Adv. 29:351–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lagesen K, et al. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Li L, et al. 27 August 2011. Biocatalytic production of (2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol from diacetyl using whole cells of engineered Escherichia coli. Bioresour. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.097. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu Z, et al. 2011. Production of (2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol and (3S)-acetoin from glucose using resting cells of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Bacillus subtilis. Bioresour. Technol. 102:10741–10744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ma C, et al. 2009. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella pneumoniae SDM. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82:49–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Margulies M, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Peters D. 2007. Raw materials. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 105:1–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Poolman B. 2002. Transporters and their roles in LAB cell physiology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82:147–164 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ragauskas AJ, et al. 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Saha BC, Bothast RJ. 1999. Production of 2,3-butanediol by newly isolated Enterobacter cloacae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52:321–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang A, et al. 2010. Production of 2,3-butanediol from corncob molasses, a waste by-product in xylitol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87:965–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang L, et al. 2010. Microbial production of 2,3-butanediol by a surfactant (serrawettin)-deficient mutant of Serratia marcescens H30. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37:857–862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES