Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Sep 28;131(2):679–690. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1788-4

Change in Physical Activity During Active Treatment in a Prospective Study of Breast Cancer Survivors

Marilyn L Kwan 1, Barbara Sternfeld 1, Isaac Joshua Ergas 1, Allegra W Timperi 1, Janise M Roh 1, Chi-Chen Hong 2, Charles P Quesenberry 1, Lawrence H Kushi 1
PMCID: PMC3273453  NIHMSID: NIHMS347946  PMID: 21953007

Abstract

Physical activity offers many benefits to breast cancer survivors, yet research on physical activity during the immediate period following a breast cancer diagnosis is limited. In a prospective cohort study of 1,696 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Program from 2006–2009, we describe change in self-reported physical activity levels from around diagnosis to six months post-diagnosis and determine factors associated with change. Participants completed a comprehensive physical activity questionnaire at baseline (2 months post-diagnosis) and at follow-up (8 months post-diagnosis). Predictors of physical activity change were determined by multivariable linear regression. Reductions in all physical activity levels were observed (P<0.0001); mean (SD) change (hours/week) of moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was −1.28 (4.48) and sedentary behavior was −0.83 (6.95). In fully-adjusted models, overweight and obesity were associated with greater declines in MVPA of −1.58 hours/week (SD=0.92) and −1.29 hours/week (SD=0.93), respectively (P=0.0079). Receipt of chemotherapy only was also associated with a greater decrease in MVPA (−2.12 hours/week; SD=0.92; P<0.0001), specifically for recreational activities (−1.62 hours/week; SD=0.64; P=0.0001). These data suggest challenges in maintaining physical activity levels during active treatment among women with breast cancer. Interventions to encourage physical activity in breast cancer survivors should be pursued.

Keywords: Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy, Cohort Studies, Physical Activity, Exercise, Radiation Therapy, Sedentary Lifestyle, Cancer Survivorship

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 2.5 million women are living after a diagnosis of breast cancer in the US today, and this number is expected to increase to 3.4 million by 2015 [1]. Physical activity has been associated with improved aerobic fitness, muscular strength, and quality of life, as well as reduced treatment-related side effects in breast cancer survivors [2, 3]. Furthermore, studies have suggested that physical activity might be related to better prognosis and/or survival after breast cancer diagnosis [421].

Research on physical activity levels in breast cancer survivors during the immediate period (first six months) after breast cancer diagnosis has been relatively limited [2228]. These primarily small- to modest-sized studies have reported decreases in physical activity in the proximate post-diagnosis period, yet how activity levels change from pre-diagnosis to post-diagnosis has only been explored in a few studies [22, 26, 28]. Furthermore, information is lacking on the associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with change in activity levels after a breast cancer diagnosis.

In this study, we describe change in physical activity measures (moderate-vigorous and sedentary) from around diagnosis to approximately eight months post-diagnosis in a prospective cohort of 1,696 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in a large managed care setting. We also examine the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with change in activity levels. This study is the largest to date to examine physical activity change during the first six months after a breast cancer diagnosis, and identifies patient characteristics that are associated with changes in physical activity. This information may thus provide guidance on identifying groups of breast cancer survivors that may benefit from physical activity interventions.

METHODS

The Pathways Study is an ongoing, prospective cohort study actively recruiting women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) patient population [29]. As of December 31, 2010, 3,331 patients have been enrolled since recruitment began in January 2006. Briefly, cases are ascertained rapidly on a daily basis by automatic scanning of electronic pathology reports with subsequent verification of cancer diagnosis and patient notification by a medical record analyst. Eligibility criteria include: current KPNC membership; at least 21 years of age at diagnosis; diagnosis of first primary invasive breast cancer (all stages); no prior history of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer; ability to speak English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin; and residence within a 65-mile radius of a field interviewer. Passive consent is obtained from the patient’s physician of record, followed by written informed consent from all participants before they are enrolled in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of KPNC and all collaborating institutions.

Data collection

The baseline interview is conducted by a trained interviewer approximately two months after diagnosis. During the baseline interview, information is collected on demographic factors such as age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, smoking history, and clinical factors including height, weight to calculate body mass index (BMI; normal <25 kg/m2, overweight 25–29 kg/m2, obese ≥30 kg/m2), menopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives, family history of breast cancer, and lymphedema. Detailed physical activity information is collected as described below. A 6-month follow-up questionnaire (approximately eight months post-diagnosis) is mailed to participants asking for updates on the same information obtained at baseline.

Physical activity

Details on physical activity for the preceding six months is collected at the baseline interview (which covers the pre-diagnosis period) and 6-month follow-up using a questionnaire based on the Arizona Activity Frequency Questionnaire [6, 30]. The questionnaire queries domains of household activities (e.g., routine cleaning, taking care of infants and toddlers, and light yard work), recreational activities (e.g., running or jogging, aerobic dance or exercise class, and tennis), transportation activities (e.g., climbing up stairs, riding a bicycle for transportation), and sedentary activities/behaviors (doing crafts, reading, socializing, attending group events, watching television, and playing games). Participants indicate how often they participate in each activity, and for activities participated in at least once per month, they select the usual duration of the activity (e.g., 15–30 minutes).

Each activity is assigned a standard MET (metabolic equivalent) value according to the Compendium by Ainsworth et al. [31]. To calculate total non-sedentary activity, a summary variable of MET-hours/week was created by multiplying the MET value of each activity by frequency and duration, and summing over all activities with a MET value. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated in hours/week of activities of 3 METs or more, overall and within specific domains of related activities (household, recreational, and transportation). For sedentary behavior, only a summary variable in hours/week was calculated as no MET values were assigned to the activities/behaviors considered sedentary. Physical activity summary values were only assigned if ≥23 activities out of 45 (for total non-sedentary activity) and ≥4 activities out of 6 (for sedentary activity/behavior) had non-missing values. Meeting physical activity guidelines was defined as 2.5 hours/week or more of moderate to vigorous intensity activity according to the 2008 US Department of Health and Human Services Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [32].

Clinical characteristics

Diagnostic characteristics are obtained from the KPNC Cancer Registry [33]. This includes data on stage of disease and tumor characteristics such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) status. Supplemental results from additional testing for equivocal Her2 expression are obtained directly from the KPNC regional cytogenetics laboratory. Information on breast surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy are obtained from the KPNC Cancer Registry and KPNC electronic data sources.

Statistical analysis

The present analysis was limited to 1,696 women enrolled in the cohort with complete baseline and 6-month follow-up physical activity information as of December 17, 2010; 81 women had already been excluded due to missing stage information. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from diagnosis to baseline into the study was 1.90 (0.63) months and from baseline to follow-up was 6.09 (1.55) months.

Physical activity measures (total non-sedentary, MVPA, and sedentary behavior) were summarized as MET-hours/week and hours/week using mean and SD, and median and interquartile (I-Q) range. Change in each measure was calculated as the difference between follow-up and baseline, where a positive or negative value indicates an increase or decrease in measure, respectively, compared to the reference measure at baseline. A one-sample paired t-test was used to compare baseline and follow-up measures.

Minimally-adjusted associations of physical activity change and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were calculated using multivariable linear regression [34], adjusting for age at diagnosis, cancer stage, and relevant baseline measure of PA. Multivariable linear regression was also used to assess the independent associations of each sociodemographic and clinical characteristic with physical activity change, with each covariate fully adjusted for all others under consideration. These covariates included age at diagnosis, season of diagnosis, race/ethnicity, education, partner status, employment, smoking history, menopausal status at baseline, BMI at baseline, AJCC stage, hormone receptor status, Her2 status, breast surgery, treatment, hormonal therapy, family history of breast cancer, oral contraceptive use, and lymphedema at follow-up.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the study population overall and by quartile of change from baseline to 6-month follow-up (about eight months post-diagnosis) for total non-sedentary activity are given in Table 1. The average age at breast cancer diagnosis was 60.4 years, and 75% were postmenopausal at baseline. Participants were primarily white (72%) and highly educated, with 86% having at least some college education or more. Less than half (43%) were employed at the time of the baseline interview. About 56% never smoked, and 41% and 3% were former or current smokers at the baseline interview, respectively. Change in total non-sedentary activity was relatively similar across most sociodemographic variables.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants, overall and by quartiles of change in total non-sedentary activity from baseline to 6 month follow-up, Pathways Study (n=1,696), 2006–2010

Totala Change in Total Non-Sedentary Activity (MET-hours/week)b, c

n % Quartile 1
(−207.38 to −22.70)
Quartile 2
(−22.70 to −7.03)
Quartile 3
(−7.03 to 5.47)
Quartile 4
(5.47 to 224.76)

n % n % n % n %
Sociodemographic Factors
Age at diagnosis (years)
    Mean (SD) 60.42 (11.61) 58.99 (11.58) 61.20 (11.55) 60.63 (11.65) 60.72 (11.63)
Season of Diagnosis
    1st quarter (Jan–Mar) 449 26.47 102 24.34 119 28.47 118 28.23 108 25.84
    2nd quarter (Apr–Jun) 438 25.83 120 28.64 111 26.56 97 23.21 105 25.12
    3rd quarter (Jul–Sep) 408 24.06 99 23.63 94 22.49 105 25.12 102 24.40
    4th quarter (Oct–Dec) 401 23.64 98 23.39 94 22.49 98 23.44 103 24.64
Race/ethnicity
    White 1,221 71.99 299 71.36 302 72.25 305 72.97 305 72.97
    Black 90 5.31 26 6.21 15 3.59 24 5.74 24 5.74
    Asian 180 10.61 45 10.74 44 10.53 40 9.57 46 11.00
    Hispanic 160 9.43 37 8.83 41 9.81 38 9.09 38 9.09
    Other 45 2.65 12 2.86 16 3.83 11 2.63 5 1.20
Education
    High school or less 240 14.15 61 14.56 55 13.16 64 15.13 55 13.16
    Some college 603 35.55 149 35.56 147 35.17 153 36.60 146 34.93
    College graduate 455 26.83 108 25.78 101 24.16 114 27.27 123 29.43
    Post-graduate 398 23.47 101 24.11 115 27.51 87 20.81 94 22.49
Partner Status
    Married/Living as married 1,066 62.85 268 63.96 271 64.83 248 59.33 266 63.64
    Widowed 190 11.20 39 9.31 43 10.29 54 12.92 49 11.72
    Separated/Divorced 301 17.75 69 16.47 78 18.66 75 17.94 76 18.18
    Single 137 8.08 43 10.26 25 5.98 41 9.81 26 6.22
Currently Employed 731 43.10 177 42.24 175 41.87 183 43.78 188 44.98
Smoking History
    Never 949 55.96 246 58.71 235 56.22 216 51.67 235 56.22
    Former 689 40.63 160 38.19 171 40.91 186 44.50 166 39.71
    Current 58 3.42 13 3.10 12 2.87 16 3.83 17 4.07
Menopausal Status at Baseline
    Postmenopausal 1,272 75.00 306 73.03 322 77.03 313 74.88 310 74.16
BMI at Baseline (kg/m2)
    <25 (normal) 634 37.38 165 39.38 167 39.95 138 33.01 154 36.84
    25–29 (overweight) 529 31.19 144 34.37 114 27.27 120 28.71 143 34.21
    ≥30 (obese) 524 30.90 109 26.01 135 32.30 156 37.32 120 28.71
Clinical Characteristics
AJCC Stage (6th Edition)
    Stage I 918 54.13 196 46.78 218 52.15 231 55.26 260 62.20
    Stage II 581 34.26 165 39.38 147 35.17 145 34.69 117 27.99
    Stage III 176 10.38 54 12.89 47 11.24 39 9.33 33 7.89
    Stage IV 21 1.24 4 0.95 6 1.44 3 0.72 8 1.91
Hormone Receptor Status
    ER+/PR+ 1,082 63.80 238 56.80 263 62.92 283 67.70 282 67.46
    ER+/PR− 328 19.34 90 21.48 85 20.33 69 16.51 82 19.62
    ER−/PR+ 2 0.12 0 0.00 1 0.24 1 0.24 0 0.00
    ER−/PR− 270 15.92 87 20.76 67 16.03 60 14.35 51 12.20
Her2 Status
    Positive 197 11.62 59 14.08 57 13.64 44 10.53 31 7.42
Breast Surgery
    None 10 0.59 2 0.48 3 0.72 3 0.72 2 0.48
    Conserving 1,064 62.74 244 58.23 260 62.20 274 65.55 274 65.55
    Mastectomy 622 36.67 173 41.29 155 37.08 141 33.73 142 33.97
Treatment
    None 378 22.29 68 16.23 102 24.40 88 21.05 112 26.79
    Chemotherapy only 560 33.02 199 47.49 133 31.82 130 31.10 93 22.25
    Radiation therapy only 556 32.78 102 24.34 131 31.34 150 35.89 165 39.47
    Both 189 11.14 48 11.46 50 11.96 48 11.48 41 9.81
Hormonal Therapy
    Yes 1,219 71.88 286 68.26 296 70.81 311 74.40 311 74.40
Family History of Breast Cancer
    Yes 364 21.46 98 23.39 92 22.01 90 21.53 81 19.38
Oral Contraceptive Use
    Yes 1,248 73.58 329 78.52 300 71.77 302 72.25 307 73.44
HRT (Postmenopausal)
    Yes 850 66.82 201 65.69 222 68.94 202 64.54 215 69.35
Lymphedema Self-Report at Follow-up
    Yes 118 6.96 26 6.21 31 7.42 24 5.74 34 8.13

Abbreviations: MET, metabolic equivalent; SD, standard deviation; ref, reference; BMI, body mass index; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

a

Missings n (%): Partner Status n=2 (0.12); Currently Employed n=5 (0.29); BMI at Baseline n=9 (0.53); Hormone Receptor Status n=14 (0.83); Her2neu Status n=43 (2.54); Chemotherapy n=13 (0.77); Hormonal Therapy n=15 (0.88); Oral Contraceptive Use n=10 (0.59); Hormone Replacement Therapy n=3 (0.24); Lymphedema Self-Report at Follow-up n=108 (6.37)

b

For the ranges defining the quartiles of change, positive (+) or negative (−) sign indicates an increase or decrease in measure, respectively, compared to reference measure at baseline.

c

n=23 women were missing complete physical activity data; n=5 and n=11 women had 0 MET-hours/week of total non-sedentary activity at baseline and 6-month follow-up, respectively.

The majority of women were diagnosed with early stage breast cancer (54% and 34% Stage I and II, respectively), and 83% had hormone receptor positive tumors (ER+ and/or PR+). About 63% of women had breast-conserving surgery only, while 37% had a mastectomy and less than 1% had no breast surgery. Approximately 33% received chemotherapy only and 33% received radiation therapy only, while 72% overall received hormonal therapy. Almost half (48%) of the women who had the greatest decline in total non-sedentary activity (Quartile 1) had chemotherapy only while 22% had an increase (Quartile 4). The opposite trend was observed for women who had radiation therapy only with almost 24% making up the lowest physical activity quartile and 40% the highest. No differences across quartile of change in activity levels were noted for type of breast cancer surgery and hormonal therapy. At the 6-month follow-up, 7% reported having lymphedema, yet no major differences across quartiles of change were apparent.

Overall, levels of physical activity decreased from baseline to 6-month follow-up (Table 2). Total non-sedentary activity decreased by a mean (SD) of −9.40 (27.94) MET-hours/week (P < 0.0001). Overall MVPA decreased by a mean (SD) of −1.28 (4.48) hours/week (P < 0.0001), and the individual MVPA domains also had similar patterns of decrease. Participants reported the greatest decrease in recreational activity (−0.74 hours/week, SD=3.09; P < 0.0001), followed by household activity and transportation activity. About 4% and 7% of women reported no MVPA at baseline and follow-up, respectively. At baseline, about 70% of the cohort was meeting the US 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines while only 58% were doing so at follow-up. Sedentary behavior decreased by a mean (SD) of −0.83 (6.95) hours/week (P < 0.0001). Socializing had the largest reduction of −0.28 hours/week (SD=2.52; P < 0.0001), followed by reading, doing crafts, attending group events, and playing games, while television watching increased by 0.32 hours/week (SD=2.25; P < 0.0001). Overall, those who had higher levels of activity at baseline also did at follow-up, and vice versa (not shown).

Table 2.

Physical activity measures at baseline and 6-month follow-up, and associated change, Pathways Study (n=1,696), 2006–2010

Baseline 6-month
Follow-up
Change from
Baseline (ref) to 6-
month Follow-upa
Mean Difference (SD)
P valuec
Total Non-Sedentary Activity (MET-hours/week)
    Median (I-Q Range)b 46.33 (28.88–68.57) 36.98 (21.45–56.70) −9.40 (27.94) <0.0001
      Quartile 1: Median (I-Q Range)b 19.80 (14.58–24.34) 14.49 (9.94–18.03) --- ---
      Quartile 2: Median (I-Q Range) 37.67 (33.60–42.05) 29.16 (25.71–33.22) --- ---
      Quartile 3: Median (I-Q Range) 56.46 (51.11–61.60) 46.00 (40.84–50.70) --- ---
      Quartile 4: Median (I-Q Range) 87.25 (76.92–105.02) 75.60 (63.98–93.75) --- ---
Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity (hours/week)
    Overall: Median (I-Q Range)b 4.69 (1.88–8.56) 3.38 (1.19–6.75) −1.28 (4.48) <0.0001
      Quartile 1: Median (I-Q Range)b 1.13 (0.69–1.69) 0.75 (0.44–1.13) --- ---
      Quartile 2: Median (I-Q Range) 3.50 (2.88–4.19) 2.56 (2.13–3.19) --- ---
      Quartile 3: Median (I-Q Range) 6.63 (5.63–7.56) 5.06 (4.31–5.94) --- ---
      Quartile 4: Median (I-Q Range) 12.00 (10.06–15.00) 10.13 (8.38–12.75) --- ---
    Household Activity: Median (I-Q Range) 0.94 (0.19–3.00) 0.63 (0–2.25) −0.44 (2.69) <0.0001
    Recreational Activity: Median (I-Q Range) 1.88 (0.19–4.50) 1.13 (0–3.25) −0.74 (3.09) <0.0001
    Transportation Activity: Median (I-Q Range) 0.50 (0–0.75) 0.19 (0–0.75) −0.08 (1.38) 0.018
Sedentary Behavior (hours/week)
    Overall: Median (I-Q Range)b 17.63 (12.56–22.63) 16.75 (12.13–21.75) −0.83 (6.95) <0.0001
      Quartile 1: Median (I-Q Range)b 9.44 (7.69–11.13) 9.56 (7.63–10.88) --- ---
      Quartile 2: Median (I-Q Range) 15.38 (14.13–16.50) 14.81 (13.50–15.75) --- ---
      Quartile 3: Median (I-Q Range) 20.06 (18.94–21.31) 19.06 (18.00–20.34) --- ---
      Quartile 4: Median (I-Q Range) 27.00 (24.75–30.00) 25.50 (23.44–28.63) --- ---
    Doing crafts: Median (I-Q Range) 0 (0–0.63) 0 (0–0.63) −0.15 (1.56) 0.0001
    Reading: Median (I-Q Range) 4.50 (2.25–7.50) 4.50 (1.88–7.50) −0.16 (2.53) 0.0092
    Socializing: Median (I-Q Range) 2.25 (1.13–4.50) 2.25 (0.75–4.50) −0.28 (2.52) <0.0001
    Attending group events: Median (I-Q Range) 0.63 (0–1.88) 0.63 (0–1.88) −0.081 (1.57) 0.038
    Watching television: Median (I-Q Range) 5.00 (3.00–7.50) 5.00 (3.00–7.50) 0.32 (2.55) <0.0001
    Playing games: Median (I-Q Range) 0 (0–0.38) 0 (0–0.38) −0.05 (1.25) 0.10

Abbreviations: ref, reference; MET, metabolic equivalent; I-Q, interquartile.

a

Positive (+) or negative (−) sign indicates an increase or decrease in measure, respectively, compared to reference measure at baseline.

b

No activity level was calculated for n=5 (0.29%) at baseline and n=11 (0.66%) at follow-up for total non-sedentary activity; n=64 (3.77%) at baseline and n=114 (6.81%) at follow-up for moderate-vigorous physical activity; n=2 (0.12%) at baseline and n=3 (0.18%) at follow-up for sedentary behavior.

c

From one-sample paired t-test comparing baseline and 6-month follow-up measures.

Change in MVPA and sedentary behavior levels from baseline to 6-month follow-up by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were minimally adjusted for age at diagnosis, AJCC stage, and relevant baseline physical activity measure (data not shown). For MVPA, being non-married (−2.24 hours/week for single women, −1.73 hours/week for separated/divorced women, and −1.62 hours/week for widows) was associated with a greater decrease compared to married (−1.35 hours/week). Similarly, being postmenopausal at baseline (−1.78 hours/week) was associated with a greater decrease in MVPA compared to premenopausal (−1.05 hours/week), as well as being overweight and obese at baseline (−1.89 and −1.70 hours/week, respectively) compared to normal weight (−1.09 hours/week). Women of all cancer stages experienced a decline in activity, although the largest declines were observed in women diagnosed with Stage III (−2.01 hours/week) tumors. Women who had chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy also had decreases in activity, yet the greatest reductions were among those who had chemotherapy only (−2.15 hours/week) and both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (−1.63 hours/week).

For sedentary behavior, Asians and Hispanics (−1.59 and −2.11 hours/week, respectively) experienced more of a decrease compared to Whites, Blacks, and Other races/ethnicities (−0.20, −0.34, and −0.19 hours/week, respectively) (data not shown). Being employed was also associated with a larger decline in sedentary behavior (−0.91 hours/week) compared to unemployed (−0.10 hours/week), as well as being postmenopausal at diagnosis (−0.82 hours/week) vs. premenopausal (0.10 hours/week). Women who had breast-conserving surgery had an increase in sedentary behavior (0.17 hours/week) compared to those who had a mastectomy (−0.27 hours/week).

Table 3 gives multivariate regression models for change in MVPA and sedentary behavior levels, adjusting for all covariates of interest. For MVPA, being overweight and obese at baseline continued to be associated with more of a decrease (−1.58 and −1.29 hours/week, respectively) compared to normal weight (−0.84 hours/week; P = 0.0079). Having chemotherapy only (−2.12 hours/week) and both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (−1.60 hours/week) also continued to be associated with a decrease in MVPA compared to no treatment (−0.60 hours/week; P < 0.0001). Radiation therapy only (−0.62 hours/week) had a similar level of decline as no treatment (−0.60 hours/week). Partner status, menopausal status, and AJCC stage were no longer associated with MVPA change.

Table 3.

Fully-adjusted multivariable linear regression of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior from baseline to six month follow-up, Pathways Study (n=1,696), 2006–2010

Change in Moderate-Vigorous Physical
Activity (hours/week)a, b
Change in Sedentary Behavior
(hours/week)a, b

LS Mean Change (SE) P value LS Mean Change (SE) P value
Sociodemographic Factors
Age at Diagnosis (years) 0.12 0.10
    <50 = Ref −0.92 (0.96) −1.93 (1.54)
    50–59 −1.45 (0.93) −1.62 (1.50)
    60–69 −1.02 (0.94) −0.84 (1.53)
    ≥70 −1.55 (0.96) −1.92 (1.54)
Season of Diagnosis 0.39 0.20
    1st quarter (Jan–Mar) = Ref −1.14 (0.93) −1.60 (1.49)
    2nd quarter (Apr–Jun) −1.53 (0.92) −1.87 (1.49)
    3rd quarter (Jul–Sep) −1.17 (0.94) −1.00 (1.52)
    4th quarter (Oct–Dec) −1.11 (0.93) −1.85 (1.50)
Race/ethnicity 0.22 0.014
    White = Ref −0.84 (0.92) −0.77 (1.48)
    Black −0.95 (1.00) −1.81 (1.62)
    Asian −1.11 (0.98) −2.12 (1.58)
    Hispanic −0.98 (0.94) −2.43 (1.52)
    Other −2.30 (1.09) −0.76 (1.75)
Education 0.60 0.0068
    High school or less = Ref −1.37 (0.96) −2.48 (1.55)
    Some college −1.37 (0.92) −1.93 (1.49)
    College graduate −1.05 (0.93) −1.07 (1.51)
    Post-graduate −1.15 (0.92) −0.83 (1.49)
Partner Status 0.14 0.77
    Married/Living as married = Ref −0.89 (0.92) −1.77 (1.49)
    Widowed −1.21 (0.97) −1.21 (1.57)
    Separated/Divorced −1.10 (0.94) −1.80 (1.51)
    Single −1.74 (0.95) −1.53 (1.54)
Currently Employed 0.15 0.031
    No = Ref −1.40 (0.92) −1.19 (1.49)
    Yes −1.07 (0.92) −1.97 (1.49)
Smoking History 0.37 0.53
    Never = Ref −1.43 (0.90) −1.96 (1.45)
    Former −1.52 (0.91) −1.77 (1.47)
    Current −0.75 (1.05) −1.00 (1.69)
Menopausal Status at Baseline 0.43 0.019
    Premenopausal = Ref −1.09 (0.95) −0.89 (1.53)
    Postmenopausal −1.38 (0.92) −2.26 (1.48)
BMI at Baseline (kg/m2) 0.0079 0.063
    <25 (normal) = Ref −0.84 (0.93) −2.11 (1.50)
    25–29 (overweight) −1.58 (0.92) −1.27 (1.49)
    ≥30 (obese) −1.29 (0.93) −1.36 (1.50)
Clinical Characteristics
AJCC Stage 0.88 0.13
    Stage I = Ref −1.20 (0.98) −2.48 (1.58)
    Stage II −1.07 (0.98) −2.61 (1.59)
    Stage III −1.33 (1.02) −2.89 (1.65)
    Stage IV −1.34 (1.23) 1.67 (1.98)
Hormone Receptor Status 0.81 0.25
    ER+/PR+ = Ref −1.02 (0.64) −2.82 (1.04)
    ER+/PR− −1.17 (0.66) −2.05 (1.06)
    ER−/PR+ −1.38 (2.78) 1.10 (4.48)
    ER−/PR− −1.37 (0.69) −2.54 (1.11)
Her2 Status 0.70 0.88
    Negative = Ref −1.09 (0.91) −1.56 (1.47)
    Positive −1.23 (0.96) −1.40 (1.55)
    Not Done −1.39 (0.96) −1.78 (1.54)
Breast Surgery 0.40 0.019
    Conserving = Ref −1.45 (0.81) 1.09 (1.31)
    None −0.49 (1.86) −6.25 (3.00)
    Mastectomy −1.76 (0.81) 0.43 (1.31)
Treatment <0.0001 0.46
    None = Ref −0.60 (0.95) −1.32 (1.53)
    Chemotherapy only −2.12 (0.92) −1.23 (1.48)
    Radiation therapy only −0.62 (0.95) −1.95 (1.54)
    Both −1.60 (0.94) −1.81 (1.52)
Hormonal therapy 0.27 0.77
    No = Ref −1.07 (0.93) −1.51 (1.50)
    Yes −1.40 (0.93) −1.65 (1.50)
Family History of Breast Cancer 0.80 0.28
    No = Ref −1.21 (0.91) −1.37 (1.47)
    Yes −1.27 (0.93) −1.79 (1.51)
Oral Contraceptive Use 0.39 0.80
    No = Ref −1.13 (0.92) −1.63 (1.49)
    Yes −1.34 (0.92) −1.53 (1.49)
Lymphedema Self-Report at Follow-up 0.42 0.24
    No = Ref −1.39 (0.90) −1.21 (1.45)
    Yes −1.08 (0.97) −1.94 (1.57)

Abbreviations: LS, least squares; SE, standard error; ref, reference; BMI, body mass index; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

a

Positive (+) or negative (−) sign indicates an increase or decrease in measure, respectively, compared to reference measure at baseline.

b

Adjusting for all covariates listed in table as well as relevant baseline physical activity measure.

For sedentary behavior, Asians, Hispanics, and Blacks (−2.12, −2.43, and −1.81 hours/week, respectively) experienced more of a decrease compared to Whites and Other races/ethnicities (−0.77 and −0.76 hours/week, respectively; P = 0.014) (Table 3). Being employed continued to be associated with more of a decline in sedentary behavior (−1.97 hours/week) compared to unemployed (−1.19 hours/week; P = 0.031) while being postmenopausal at baseline remained associated with a greater decrease in sedentary behavior (−2.26 hours/week) compared to premenopausal (−0.89 hours/week; P = 0.019). Women who had any breast surgery had an increase in sedentary behavior (1.09 hours/week for conserving and 0.43 hours/week for mastectomy) whereas the small group who had no surgery experienced a decrease (−6.25 hours/week; P = 0.019). While not observed in the minimally-adjusted models, more education (−0.83 hours/week for post-graduate level vs. −2.48 hours/week for high school or less; P = 0.0068) and higher BMI were each associated with less of a decrease in sedentary behavior (−1.36 hours/week for obese women vs. −2.11 hours/week for normal weight women; P = 0.063).

Table 4 gives change in levels of MVPA by domain, and sedentary behavior by activity, within each treatment group (chemotherapy only, radiation therapy only, both, none) adjusted for all covariates of interest. For each MVPA domain, reductions were observed in each treatment group, yet for recreational activity, the greatest decrease was among women who had chemotherapy only (−1.62 hours week), followed by both chemotherapy and radiation, radiation only, and no treatment (−1.26, −0.71, and −0.68 hours/week, respectively; P = 0.0001). For the sedentary behavior activities, there was a suggestion that women experienced increases in doing crafts and watching television, and decreases in reading (except for chemotherapy only), socializing, attending group events, and playing games.

Table 4.

Fully-adjusted multivariable linear regression of change in physical activity measures from baseline to 6-month follow-up by treatment status, Pathways Study (n=1,696), 2006–2010

Change in Physical Activity from Baseline (ref) to 6-month
Follow-up
LS Mean Change (SE)a, b

None=Ref
(n=378)
Chemotherapy
only
(n=560)
Radiation
Therapy only
(n=556)
Chemotherapy
and Radiation
Therapy
(n=189)
P valueb
Moderate-Vigorous Physical
Activity (hours/week)
    Overall −0.60 (0.95) −2.12 (0.92) −0.62 (0.95) −1.60 (0.94) <0.0001
    Household Activity −0.06 (0.61) −0.51 (0.59) −0.15 (0.61) −0.55 (0.60) 0.12
    Recreational Activity −0.68 (0.66) −1.62 (0.64) −0.71 (0.67) −1.26 (0.66) 0.0001
    Transportation Activity −0.12 (0.32) −0.36 (0.31) −0.19 (0.32) −0.17 (0.32) 0.11
Sedentary Behavior (hours/week)
    Overall −1.32 (1.53) −1.23 (1.48) −1.95 (1.54) −1.81 (1.52) 0.46
    Doing crafts 0.08 (0.38) 0.03 (0.37) 0.16 (0.38) 0.07 (0.38) 0.82
    Reading −0.10 (0.58) 0.08 (0.56) −0.30 (0.58) −0.27 (0.57) 0.20
    Socializing −0.89 (0.54) −0.86 (0.52) −1.17 (0.54) −0.99 (0.53) 0.29
    Attending group events −0.14 (0.38) −0.28 (0.37) −0.02 (0.38) −0.19 (0.38) 0.24
    Watching television 0.54 (0.58) 0.68 (0.56) 0.39 (0.58) 0.31 (0.57) 0.27
    Playing games −0.26 (0.29) −0.44 (0.28) −0.46 (0.30) −0.52 (0.29) 0.14

Abbreviations: LS, least squares; SE, standard error; ref, reference.

a

Positive (+) or negative (−) sign indicates an increase or decrease in measure, respectively, compared to reference measure at baseline.

b

Adjusting for all covariates listed in Table 3 as well as relevant baseline physical activity measure.

DISCUSSION

In this prospective cohort study of 1,696 breast cancer survivors, we found that physical activity levels, including sedentary behavior, decreased from the time around diagnosis to the period encompassing active treatment, assessed approximately eight months post-diagnosis. Having chemotherapy and being overweight or obese were the strongest independent predictors of experiencing a significant decline in moderate-vigorous physical activity. Being non-white, employed at diagnosis, postmenopausal at diagnosis, and having no breast surgery were independently related to a larger decrease in sedentary behavior, while being more educated and overweight or obese at diagnosis were associated with less of a decrease. Our results confirm findings from other studies reporting declines in physical activity after a breast cancer diagnosis. However, we were able to further characterize these changes by treatment status and other sociodemographic and clinical factors, and more closely examine the role of sedentary behavior.

Previous studies that have examined physical activity (usually non-sedentary or recreational) changes before and after a breast cancer diagnosis have generally reported decreases in activity immediately after diagnosis [22, 26, 28] and then increases at six months post-treatment [22] or 12–18 months post-diagnosis [28], although these increases did not reach pre-diagnosis levels. Younger age at diagnosis (<40 years and 40–49 years compared to ≥50 years) and lower BMI (<25 kg/m2) have been found to be associated with greater reductions in physical activity from pre-diagnosis to 12 months post-diagnosis [28]. In contrast, another study found that obese and overweight women had greater reductions in physical activity compared to normal weight women [26], which is in general agreement with our results. Studies have also reported that the amount of change in physical activity was dependent on pre-diagnosis activity levels [26, 28]. Our results reflected similar trends of women starting in the highest category of physical activity experiencing the greatest reduction while women in the lowest category having the least reduction.

Receipt of adjuvant breast cancer therapy can induce treatment-related side effects such as fatigue, nausea, pain, and other physiologic distress, which can disrupt a woman’s normal activity levels [3]. We found that women who had chemotherapy only and both chemotherapy and radiation therapy experienced the largest declines in non-sedentary activity from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Similarly, a small prospective study of 231 breast cancer patients reported decreases in leisure-time exercise activity both in women who had radiation therapy only and chemotherapy plus radiation therapy from pre-diagnosis to completion of adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy only was not examined) [22]. Our results also support findings from another breast cancer survivor cohort study of 812 women that reported the greatest reductions in non-sedentary activity among those who had surgery and chemotherapy, and surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from pre-diagnosis to 4–12 months post-diagnosis, yet these groups also had the largest increases in sedentary behavior [26].

Sedentary behavior is a growing area of interest in chronic disease and breast cancer research [3540], which may reduce overall energy expenditure [41] and lead to adverse effects on various breast cancer-related biological pathways, including decreased estrogen metabolism [42, 43] and increased insulin resistance and inflammation [4446]. Yet, some sedentary behaviors could facilitate social support, such as socializing and attending group events, and thus might be encouraged to improve quality of life in survivors [47]. In contrast to the results reported in the breast cancer survivor cohort study of 812 women [26], Pathways women overall experienced a general decline in sedentary behavior from around diagnosis to eight months post-diagnosis. The decrease was a mixture of less time spent reading, socializing, attending group events, and playing games, which require more active focus, with more time watching television, which is more passive in nature. Some predictors of change in sedentary behavior in our population might be related to higher functional and physical status after a breast cancer diagnosis (e.g., employed, normal weight, no breast surgery). These factors could represent an active, labor-intensive lifestyle, thereby decreasing the likelihood of engaging in sedentary behaviors.

The importance of exercise in cancer prevention and control has emerged over the last 20 years [48, 49], and its physical and mental benefits to cancer survival are now recognized [50]. The American College of Sports Medicine has concluded that exercise can be safe during and after cancer treatments and can improve aerobic fitness, muscular strength, quality of life, and fatigue in certain survivor groups, including breast cancer [3]. We also recently reported in the Pathways Study that physical activity is associated with improved quality of life during the first several months after cancer diagnosis [51]. For individuals with chronic conditions such as cancer, being as physically active as their abilities and conditions allow and avoiding inactivity is advised [32].

While a breast cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment can disrupt a woman’s normal activity levels [52], it can be an opportune time to educate and motivate the individual to adopt healthier lifestyle changes, including physical activity, to promote long-term health as a cancer survivor [53, 54]. Identifying women who could benefit most from physical activity interventions could facilitate and guide the health education process. We report several possible factors such as high BMI and receipt of chemotherapy that are associated with greater declines in non-sedentary activity in the immediate post-diagnosis period and during adjuvant therapy. We also confirm that women who were the most active before their cancer diagnosis experienced the largest decline while those who were the least active had the smallest decline. Despite the latter group having the lowest decline, these women should still be encouraged to increase their post-diagnosis activity levels.

Several limitations of the study should be noted. Physical activity was self-reported after breast cancer diagnosis, thus over-reporting (or under-reporting) of physical activity is possible. Nonetheless, this potential bias would not have altered the qualitative estimated change in activity levels over time, as the same instrument was used at baseline and follow-up, and regardless of activity levels, the relative ranking of individuals would not have been affected. While two studies have shown that physical activity levels eventually increase but do not return to pre-diagnosis levels among breast cancer survivors [25, 28], we did not explore this area of long-term physical activity change since the scope of the present paper was on short-term change. Future analyses from this cohort will focus on greater longitudinal change in activity levels as data become available at other follow-up periods. Despite these limitations, notable strengths of the study include being the largest prospective study to date of physical activity change from around the time of diagnosis to about eight months post-diagnosis in breast cancer survivors, and capturing non-recreational sources of physical activity as well as sedentary behavior.

In conclusion, an overall decrease in physical activity, both moderate-vigorous and sedentary, from around diagnosis to about eight months post-diagnosis was observed in this prospective study of breast cancer survivors. Women with higher body mass and who had received chemotherapy were more likely to have larger decreases in moderate-vigorous activity levels. This information points to specific groups of women after a breast cancer diagnosis for whom attention to activity may be particularly important. Our findings also indicate that the active treatment period is characterized by overall decreases in physical activity among women with breast cancer. Given the growing knowledge that physical activity improves quality of life [51] and long-term outcomes in women with breast cancer [48], encouragement of continued physical activity in the absence of clear contraindications, even in the early post-diagnosis months, may be warranted.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (grant number 2R01 CA105274). The authors thank office and field staff for data collection, processing, and preparation. We thank all Pathways Study participants for their numerous contributions to this study.

Abbreviations

BMI

body mass index

ER

estrogen receptor

Her2

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

I-Q

interquartile

KPNC

Kaiser Permanente Northern California

MET

metabolic equivalent

MVPA

moderate-vigorous physical activity

SD

standard deviation

PR

progesterone receptor

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES: none

The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

REFERENCES

  • 1.De Angelis R, Tavilla A, Verdecchia A, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Feuer EJ, Mariotto AB. Breast cancer survivors in the United States: geographic Variability and Time Trends, 2005–2015. Cancer. 2009 doi: 10.1002/cncr.24217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Courneya KS, Segal RJ, Mackey JR, Gelmon K, Reid RD, Friedenreich CM, Ladha AB, Proulx C, Vallance JK, Lane K, Yasui Y, McKenzie DC. Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4396–4404. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1409–1426. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Holick CN, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bersch AJ, Stampfer MJ, Baron JA, Egan KM, Willett WC. Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(2):379–386. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, Kroenke CH, Colditz GA. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. Jama. 2005;293(20):2479–2486. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.20.2479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sternfeld B, Weltzien E, Quesenberry CP, Jr, Castillo AL, Kwan M, Slattery ML, Caan BJ. Physical activity and risk of recurrence and mortality in breast cancer survivors: findings from the LACE study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(1):87–95. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Irwin ML, Smith AW, McTiernan A, Ballard-Barbash R, Cronin K, Gilliland FD, Baumgartner RN, Baumgartner KB, Bernstein L. Influence of pre- and postdiagnosis physical activity on mortality in breast cancer survivors: the health, eating, activity, and lifestyle study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(24):3958–3964. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Irwin ML, McTiernan A, Manson JE, Thomson CA, Sternfeld B, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, Craft L, Lane D, Martin LW, Chlebowski R. Physical Activity and Survival in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: Results from the Women's Health Initiative. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4(4):522–529. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barbaric M, Brooks E, Moore L, Cheifetz O. Effects of physical activity on cancer survival: a systematic review. Physiother Can. 2010;62(1):25–34. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patterson RE, Cadmus LA, Emond JA, Pierce JP. Physical activity, diet, adiposity and female breast cancer prognosis: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Maturitas. 2010;66(1):5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ibrahim EM, Al-Homaidh A. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: meta-analysis of published studies. Med Oncol. 2011;28(3):753–765. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9536-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borugian MJ, Sheps SB, Kim-Sing C, Van Patten C, Potter JD, Dunn B, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG. Insulin, macronutrient intake, and physical activity: are potential indicators of insulin resistance associated with mortality from breast cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(7):1163–1172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pierce JP, Stefanick ML, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, Sternfeld B, Madlensky L, Al-Delaimy WK, Thomson CA, Kealey S, Hajek R, Parker BA, Newman VA, Caan B, Rock CL. Greater survival after breast cancer in physically active women with high vegetable-fruit intake regardless of obesity. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(17):2345–2351. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Friedenreich CM, Gregory J, Kopciuk KA, Mackey JR, Courneya KS. Prospective cohort study of lifetime physical activity and breast cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(8):1954–1962. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McTiernan A, Irwin M, Vongruenigen V. Weight, physical activity, diet, and prognosis in breast and gynecologic cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(26):4074–4080. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.27.9752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bertram LA, Stefanick ML, Saquib N, Natarajan L, Patterson RE, Bardwell W, Flatt SW, Newman VA, Rock CL, Thomson CA, Pierce JP. Physical activity, additional breast cancer events, and mortality among early-stage breast cancer survivors: findings from the WHEL Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9714-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen X, Lu W, Zheng W, Gu K, Matthews CE, Chen Z, Zheng Y, Shu XO. Exercise after diagnosis of breast cancer in association with survival. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4(9):1409–1418. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abrahamson PE, Gammon MD, Lund MJ, Britton JA, Marshall SW, Flagg EW, Porter PL, Brinton LA, Eley JW, Coates RJ. Recreational physical activity and survival among young women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2006;107(8):1777–1785. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.West-Wright CN, Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Ursin G, Deapen D, Neuhausen S, Reynolds P, Chang E, Ma H, Bernstein L. Long-term and recent recreational physical activity and survival after breast cancer: the California Teachers Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(11):2851–2859. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Emaus A, Veierod MB, Tretli S, Finstad SE, Selmer R, Furberg AS, Bernstein L, Schlichting E, Thune I. Metabolic profile, physical activity, and mortality in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121(3):651–660. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0603-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carmichael AR, Daley AJ, Rea DW, Bowden SJ. Physical activity and breast cancer outcome: A brief review of evidence, current practice and future direction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andrykowski MA, Beacham AO, Jacobsen PB. Prospective, longitudinal study of leisure-time exercise in women with early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):430–438. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, Coremans T, Fieuws S, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Truijen S, Neven P, Christiaens MR. Physical activity levels after treatment for breast cancer: one-year follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):417–425. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0997-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Emery CF, Yang HC, Frierson GM, Peterson LJ, Suh S. Determinants of physical activity among women treated for breast cancer in a 5-year longitudinal follow-up investigation. Psychooncology. 2009;18(4):377–386. doi: 10.1002/pon.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Harrison S, Hayes SC, Newman B. Level of physical activity and characteristics associated with change following breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Psychooncology. 2009;18(4):387–394. doi: 10.1002/pon.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Irwin ML, Crumley D, McTiernan A, Bernstein L, Baumgartner R, Gilliland FD, Kriska A, Ballard-Barbash R. Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma: the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) study. Cancer. 2003;97(7):1746–1757. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Irwin ML, McTiernan A, Bernstein L, Gilliland FD, Baumgartner R, Baumgartner K, Ballard-Barbash R. Physical activity levels among breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(9):1484–1491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Littman AJ, Tang MT, Rossing MA. Longitudinal study of recreational physical activity in breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):119–127. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0113-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kwan ML, Ambrosone CB, Lee MM, Barlow J, Krathwohl SE, Ergas IJ, Ashley CH, Bittner JR, Darbinian J, Stronach K, Caan BJ, Davis W, Kutner SE, Quesenberry CP, Somkin CP, Sternfeld B, Wiencke JK, Zheng S, Kushi LH. The Pathways Study: a prospective study of breast cancer survivorship within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(10):1065–1076. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9170-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Staten LK, Taren DL, Howell WH, Tobar M, Poehlman ET, Hill A, Reid PM, Ritenbaugh C. Validation of the Arizona Activity Frequency Questionnaire using doubly labeled water. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1959–1967. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200111000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR, Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR, Jr, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498–S504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oehrli MD, Quesenberry CP, Leyden WA. Northern California Cancer Registry: Kaiser Permanente; 2009. 2009 Annual Report on Trends, Incidence, and Outcomes. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Selvin S. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press; 1995. Practical Biostatistical Methods. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Friedenreich CM. The role of physical activity in breast cancer etiology. Semin Oncol. 2010;37(3):297–302. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56(11):2655–2667. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Owen N, Bauman A, Brown W. Too much sitting: a novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk? Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(2):81–83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.055269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–113. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lynch BM, Friedenreich CM, Winkler EA, Healy GN, Vallance JK, Eakin EG, Owen N. Associations of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time with biomarkers of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES (2003–2006) Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1559-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mathew A, Gajalakshmi V, Rajan B, Kanimozhi VC, Brennan P, Binukumar BP, Boffetta P. Physical activity levels among urban and rural women in south India and the risk of breast cancer: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009;18(5):368–376. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832e1c46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brown WJ, Bauman AE, Owen N. Stand up, sit down, keep moving: turning circles in physical activity research? Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(2):86–88. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.055285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Booth FW, Laye MJ, Lees SJ, Rector RS, Thyfault JP. Reduced physical activity and risk of chronic disease: the biology behind the consequences. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(4):381–390. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0606-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Matthews CE, Fowke JH, Dai Q, Leon Bradlow H, Jin F, Shu XO, Gao YT, Longcope C, Hebert JR, Zheng W. Physical activity, body size, and estrogen metabolism in women. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(5):473–481. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036445.04238.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):639–645. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181607421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW, Winkler EA, Owen N. Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003–06. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(5):590–597. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gustat J, Srinivasan SR, Elkasabany A, Berenson GS. Relation of self-rated measures of physical activity to multiple risk factors of insulin resistance syndrome in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(10):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00427-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Somkin CP, Quesenberry CP, Jr, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Mandelblatt J, Pelayo MP, Timperi AW, Miles SQ, Kushi LH. Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0764-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kushi LH, Byers T, Doyle C, Bandera EV, McCullough M, McTiernan A, Gansler T, Andrews KS, Thun MJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(5):254–281. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254. quiz 313-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research. Washington, D.C.: AICR; 2007. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Doyle C, Kushi LH, Byers T, Courneya KS, Demark-Wahnefried W, Grant B, McTiernan A, Rock CL, Thompson C, Gansler T, Andrews KS. Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(6):323–353. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.6.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mandelblatt JS, Luta G, Kwan ML, Makgoeng SB, Ergas IJ, Roh JM, Sternfeld B, Adams-Campbell LL, Kushi LH. Associations of physical activity with quality of life and functional ability in breast cancer patients during active adjuvant treatment: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1483-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Demark-Wahnefried W, Hars V, Conaway MR, Havlin K, Rimer BK, McElveen G, Winer EP. Reduced rates of metabolism and decreased physical activity in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(5):1495–1501. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.5.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM. Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5814–5830. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Humpel N, Magee C, Jones SC. The impact of a cancer diagnosis on the health behaviors of cancer survivors and their family and friends. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(6):621–630. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0207-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES