Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase from Plasmodium falciparum produced in Escherichia coli was crystallized by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in complex with OA and PRPP in the presence of Mg2+.
Keywords: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase, Plasmodium falciparum
Abstract
Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) catalyzes the Mg2+-dependent condensation of orotic acid (OA) with 5-α-d-phosphorylribose 1-diphosphate (PRPP) to yield diphosphate (PPi) and the nucleotide orotidine 5′-monophosphate. OPRT from Plasmodium falciparum produced in Escherichia coli was crystallized by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in complex with OA and PRPP in the presence of Mg2+. The crystal exhibited tetragonal symmetry, belonging to space group P41 or P43, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 49.15, c = 226.94 Å. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.5 Å resolution at 100 K using a synchrotron-radiation source.
1. Introduction
There are an estimated 300–500 million cases of malaria and up to three million people die from this disease annually. Plasmodium falciparum is the causative agent of the most lethal and severe form of human malaria (Guerin et al., 2002 ▶). Chemotherapy for malaria is available, but is complicated by both adverse effects and widespread resistance to most currently available antimalarial drugs (Attaran et al., 2004 ▶; White, 2004 ▶). More efficacious and less toxic drugs which uniquely target the parasite are therefore required. The malaria parasite depends on de novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides, whereas the human host has the ability to synthesize them by both de novo and salvage pathways (Krungkrai et al., 1990 ▶; Jones, 1980 ▶; Weber, 1983 ▶). The final two steps of uridine 5-monophosphate (UMP) synthesis require the addition of ribose 5-phosphate from 5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) to orotic acid (OA) by orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT; EC 2.4.2.10) to form orotidine 5-monophosphate (OMP) and the the subsequent decarboxylation of OMP to form UMP by OMP decarboxylase (OMPDC; EC 4.1.1.23). These enzymes are encoded by two separate genes in most prokaryotes and the malaria parasite (Krungkrai et al., 2003 ▶; Krungkrai, Aoki et al., 2004 ▶). Previous studies have demonstrated that the two enzymes exist as a heterotetrameric (OPRT)2(OMPDC)2 complex in two species of malaria parasite: P. falciparum and P. berghei (Krungkrai, Prapunwattana et al., 2004 ▶; Krungkrai et al., 2005 ▶). In contrast, in most multicellular organisms, including humans, these genes are fused into a single gene, resulting in the bifunctional UMP synthase (Livingstone & Jones, 1987 ▶; Suttle et al., 1988 ▶; Suchi et al., 1997 ▶).
Phosphoribosyltransferases (PRTs) are divided into two evolutionary families, types I and II, which are characterized by distinct folding architectures. OPRT belongs to the type I family. The P. falciparum OPRT (PfOPRT) has only 28% sequence identity to the human enzyme according to ClustalW calculations (Krungkrai, Aoki et al., 2004 ▶). Because of the low similarity between the two enzymes and the existence of the salvage pathway in humans, inhibition of OPRT would be harmless to the human body with respect to synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides. Therefore, PfOPRT has promise as an antimalarial drug target. To enable structure-based drug design of the enzyme, its three-dimensional structure is necessary. The crystal structures of three bacterial and yeast OPRTs are known: those from Salmonella typhimurium (Scapin et al., 1994 ▶, 1995 ▶), Escherichia coli (Henriksen et al., 1996 ▶), Streptococcus mutans (Liu et al., 2010 ▶) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (González-Segura et al., 2007 ▶). Here, we report the crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction study of PfOPRT in complex with OA and PRPP.
2. Experimental
2.1. Protein expression and purification
Recombinant PfOPRT was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS (Novagen) as described previously (Krungkrai, Aoki et al., 2004 ▶). The E. coli cells were disrupted using a sonicator or a French press in buffer A (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole) containing a protease-inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The sample was applied onto a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a linear gradient of 10–250 mM imidazole in buffer A. The fractions containing PfOPRT were pooled and applied onto a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare), which was developed with buffer B (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol). The purified protein was concentrated to 20 mg ml−1 using a Vivaspin (Sartorius) and stored at 193 K until the crystallization experiments. Up to 3.7 mg purified PfOPRT was obtained from 9 l E. coli cell culture.
2.2. Crystallization of PfOPRT
Crystals of PfOPRT with maximum dimensions of 0.05 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm appeared using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in an Intelli-Plate 96 (Art Robbins Instruments) at 293 K within one month (Fig. 1 ▶). The drop consisted of 0.5 µl protein solution (8 mg ml−1 PfOPRT, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 µM OA, 500 µM PRPP) and 0.5 µl reservoir solution (60 mM sodium cacodylate trihydrate pH 6.8, 31.5% polyethylene glycol 300, 3% trimethylamine N-oxide dihydrate) and was equilibrated against 60 µl reservoir solution in the deep well of an Intelli-Plate 96.
Figure 1.
Crystal of PfOPRT. Crystals were obtained in a sitting drop.
3. Data collection and analysis
X-ray diffraction data were measured on beamline BL17A at the Photon Factory (Tsukuba, Japan). A crystal fished out from a crystallization drop was flash-cooled in a nitrogen-gas stream at 100 K without soaking in additional cryoprotectant solution. The diffraction patterns (Fig. 2 ▶) were recorded on a Quantum 315 CCD detector (ADSC). The wavelength, crystal-to-detector distance, crystal oscillation angle per image and beam exposure time were set to 0.98 Å, 319.1 mm, 0.8° and 12 s, respectively. A complete data set was collected from 150 images covering 120° in total.
Figure 2.
X-ray diffraction image from a PfOPRT crystal. The frame edge in the enlargement is 2.5 Å.
The data set was processed using the HKL-2000 program suite (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶). The crystal of PfOPRT was tetragonal, belonging to space group P41 or P43, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 49.15, c = 226.94 Å. From the 244 322 accepted observations to 2.5 Å resolution, 15 138 unique reflections were obtained. Assuming two monomers of the PfOPRT in the asymmetric unit, the crystal volume per enzyme mass (V M) and solvent content were calculated to be 2.08 Å3 Da−1 and 41%, respectively. The low completeness of the diffraction data (82.2%) was caused by the crystal anisotropy. A summary of the data statistics is presented in Table 1 ▶.
Table 1. Crystal parameters and X-ray diffraction data-collection statistics.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
Crystal system | Tetragonal |
Space group | P41 or P43 |
Unit-cell parameters (Å) | a = b = 49.15, c = 226.94 |
Resolution range (Å) | 50–2.5 (2.59–2.50) |
No. of molecules in asymmetric unit | 2 |
VM (Å3 Da−1) | 2.08 |
Vsolv (%) | 41 |
No. of measured reflections | 244322 |
No. of unique reflections | 15318 |
Rmerge† (%) | 9.7 (25.0) |
Completeness (%) | 82.2 (74.3) |
Average I/σ(I) | 9.4 (2.0) |
R
merge =
, where I
i(hkl) is the value of the ith measurement of the intensity of a reflection, 〈I(hkl)〉 is the mean value of the intensity of that reflection and the summation is over all measurements.
Molecular-replacement calculations with the programs MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010 ▶) and BALBES (Long et al., 2008 ▶) from the CCP4 program package (Winn et al., 2011 ▶) are currently in progress using the structure of S. cerevisiae OPRT (PDB entry 2ps1; González-Segura et al., 2007 ▶) as a search model. The model enzyme shares 22% sequence identity with PfOPRT. The solved atomic structure should provide insight into how PfOPRT interacts with OA and PRPP in the presence of Mg2+.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the staff for their excellent support during data collection on BL17A at Photon Factory. This work was supported by the Knowledge Cluster Initiative and in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 22550152) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to TI).
References
- Attaran, A., Barnes, K. I., Curtis, C., d’Alessandro, U., Fanello, C. I., Galinski, M. R., Kokwaro, G., Looareesuwan, S., Makanga, M., Mutabingwa, T. K., Talisuna, A., Trape, J. F. & Watkins, W. M. (2004). Lancet, 363, 237–240. [DOI] [PubMed]
- González-Segura, L., Witte, J. F., McClard, R. W. & Hurley, T. D. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 14075–14086. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Guerin, P. J., Olliaro, P., Nosten, F., Druilhe, P., Laxminarayan, R., Binka, F., Kilama, W. L., Ford, N. & White, N. J. (2002). Lancet Infect. Dis. 2, 564–573. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Henriksen, A., Aghajari, N., Jensen, K. F. & Gajhede, M. (1996). Biochemistry, 35, 3803–3809. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Jones, M. E. (1980). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 253–279. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Krungkrai, J., Cerami, A. & Henderson, G. B. (1990). Biochemistry, 29, 6270–6275. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Krungkrai, J., Prapunwatana, P., Wichitkul, C., Reungprapavut, S., Krungkrai, S. R. & Horii, T. (2003). Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 34, Suppl. 2, 32–43. [PubMed]
- Krungkrai, S. R., Aoki, S., Palacpac, N. M., Sato, D., Mitamura, T., Krungkrai, J. & Horii, T. (2004). Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 134, 245–255. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Krungkrai, S. R., DelFraino, B. J., Smiley, J. A., Prapunwattana, P., Mitamura, T., Horii, T. & Krungkrai, J. (2005). Biochemistry, 44, 1643–1652. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Krungkrai, S. R., Prapunwattana, P., Horii, T. & Krungkrai, J. (2004). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 1012–1018. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.-P., Xu, R., Gao, Z.-Q., Xu, J.-H., Hou, H.-F., Li, L.-Q., She, Z., Li, L.-F., Su, X.-D., Liu, P. & Dong, Y.-H. (2010). Acta Cryst. F66, 498–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Livingstone, L. R. & Jones, M. E. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262, 15726–15733. [PubMed]
- Long, F., Vagin, A. A., Young, P. & Murshudov, G. N. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Scapin, G., Grubmeyer, C. & Sacchettini, J. C. (1994). Biochemistry, 33, 1287–1294. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Scapin, G., Ozturk, D. H., Grubmeyer, C. & Sacchettini, J. C. (1995). Biochemistry, 34, 10744–10754. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Suchi, M., Mizuno, H., Kawai, Y., Tsuboi, T., Sumi, S., Okajima, K., Hodgson, M. E., Ogawa, H. & Wada, Y. (1997). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 525–539. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Suttle, D. P., Bugg, B. Y., Winkler, J. K. & Kanalas, J. J. (1988). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1754–1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Weber, G. (1983). Cancer Res. 43, 3466–3492. [PubMed]
- White, N. J. (2004). J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1084–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.