Four distinct subsets of invariant natural killer T (NKT) cells are shown to differentiate in the thymus, then migrate to peripheral tissues where they retain their phenotypic and functional characteristics.
Abstract
There is heterogeneity in invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells based on the expression of CD4 and the IL-17 receptor B (IL-17RB), a receptor for IL-25 which is a key factor in TH2 immunity. However, the development pathway and precise function of these iNKT cell subtypes remain unknown. IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are present in the thymic CD44+/− NK1.1− population and develop normally even in the absence of IL-15, which is required for maturation and homeostasis of IL-17RB− iNKT cells producing IFN-γ. These results suggest that iNKT cells contain at least two subtypes, IL-17RB+ and IL-17RB− subsets. The IL-17RB+ iNKT subtypes can be further divided into two subtypes on the basis of CD4 expression both in the thymus and in the periphery. CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells produce TH2 (IL-13), TH9 (IL-9 and IL-10), and TH17 (IL-17A and IL-22) cytokines in response to IL-25 in an E4BP4-dependent fashion, whereas CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are a retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR)γt+ subset producing TH17 cytokines upon stimulation with IL-23 in an E4BP4-independent fashion. These IL-17RB+ iNKT cell subtypes are abundantly present in the lung in the steady state and mediate the pathogenesis in virus-induced airway hyperreactivity (AHR). In this study we demonstrated that the IL-17RB+ iNKT cell subsets develop distinct from classical iNKT cell developmental stages in the thymus and play important roles in the pathogenesis of airway diseases.
Author Summary
T cells are a diverse group of immune cells involved in cell-mediated acquired immunity. One subset of T cells is the innate-like invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells that recognize glycolipid ligands on target cells instead of peptides. We know that functionally distinct subtypes of iNKT cells are involved in specific pathologies, yet their development, phenotypes, and functions are not well understood. Here, we determine the relationship between various mouse iNKT cell subsets, identify reliable molecular markers for these subsets, and show that these contribute to their functional differences. We identify four iNKT cell subsets that we show arise via different developmental pathways and exhibit different cytokine profiles. Importantly, we show that these subsets can be isolated from the thymus (the organ of all T cells), as well as from peripheral tissues such as spleen, liver, lung, and lymph nodes. Contrary to the general understanding that iNKT cells mature after their exit from the thymus and their migration into peripheral tissues, we conclude that distinct phenotypic and functional iNKT cell subsets can be distinguished in the thymus by virtue of the presence or absence of the cytokine receptor IL-17RB and another cell surface molecule called CD4, and these subsets then migrate to peripheral tissues where they retain their phenotypic and functional characteristics. Regarding functional significance, we show that those iNKT cell subsets that lead to airway hyper-responsiveness to respiratory viruses are different to those that lead to allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity, which will enable researchers to focus on specific subsets as potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
Introduction
Natural killer T (NKT) cells, unlike conventional T cells bearing diverse antigen receptors, are characterized by the expression of an invariant T cell receptor (TCR), Vα14Jα18 paired with Vβ8, Vβ7, or Vβ2 in mice [1] and the Vα24Jα18/Vβ11 pair in humans [2],[3], that recognizes glycolipid antigens in conjunction with the monomorphic MHC class I-like CD1d molecule [4],[5]. Therefore, these cells are termed invariant NKT (iNKT) cells. Another characteristic feature of iNKT cells is their rapid and massive production of a range of cytokines, such as those typically produced by T helper cell (TH) 1, TH2, and TH17 cells [6]–[8], upon stimulation with their ligand, α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) [9],.
It is speculated that the ability of iNKT cells to produce these various cytokines is due either to the microenvironment in which they undergo priming or to the existence of functionally distinct subtypes of iNKT cells producing different cytokines; however, there is no clear-cut evidence to support the latter notion. It has been reported that iNKT cells include both CD4+ and CD4− subtypes [6],[11], each of which produces different cytokines. Human CD4+ iNKT cells produce both TH1 and TH2 cytokines, whereas CD4− iNKT cells produce mainly TH1 cytokines [12],[13]. Although such functional differences were originally less apparent in mouse CD4+ and CD4− iNKT cells, two functionally distinct subtypes of iNKT cells in the mouse thymus have since been identified based on NK1.1 expression; NK1.1− iNKT cells produce a large amount of IL-4 and little IFN-γ, whereas NK1.1+ iNKT cells produce less IL-4 and more IFN-γ [14],[15]. Furthermore, CD4− iNKT cells in the liver have been found to be more effective in mediating tumor rejection than CD4+ iNKT cells in the liver or any other tissues [16].
There is also further heterogeneity of CD4+ iNKT cells in terms of expression of the IL-17 receptor B (IL-17RB), a receptor for IL-25 [17]. IL-25 is a key factor in TH2 immunity, including allergic reactions and airway hyperreactivity (AHR). The CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells produce large amounts of IL-13 and IL-4 but little IFN-γ in response to IL-25, mediating a key role in IL-25-driven AHR [17],[18]. Another subset of newly identified iNKT cells within the NK1.1− CD4− subset is the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR)γt+ iNKT cells. These cells can induce autoimmune disorders by their production of IL-17A and IL-22 [8],[19], even though IL-17A-producing iNKT cells are not restricted to a particular iNKT cell subset [20].
The emergence of functionally distinct subpopulations of iNKT cells is reminiscent of how iNKT subtypes develop in the thymus and expand in the periphery. Here, we demonstrate IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are a subtype distinct from the CD122+ iNKT cells producing IFN-γ. Moreover, there are two subtypes of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells; CD4− produces TH17 cytokines in an IL-23-dependent fashion, whereas the other CD4+ produces TH2 and TH17 cytokines in an IL-25 dependent manner. In addition, these IL-17RB+ iNKT cells contribute to the induction of virus and viral antigen-induced chronic AHR.
Results
Identification of Two Distinct Subtypes in iNKT Cells; IL-17RB+ iNKT Cells Producing TH2 and TH17 Cytokines and IL-17RB− iNKT Cells Producing IFN-γ
We previously identified a fraction of splenic CD4+ iNKT cells that expresses IL-17RB and produces TH2 cytokines after treatment with IL-25 [17]. In order to directly analyze the function of IL-17RB on iNKT cells, we generated IL-17RB-deficient mice by the disruption of exon 1 and exon 2 of the Il17rb gene (Figure S1). We then compared the number and function of iNKT cells in the spleen and the liver from Il17rb −/− mice on a C57BL/6 (B6) background to those of wild type (WT) B6 mice. We also included in our comparison Il15 L117P mice, in which leucine (CTT) at amino acid position 117 of IL-15 was substituted with proline (CCT), because IL-15 is reported to be critical for the development and homeostatic maintenance of iNKT cells [21],[22], as well as other cell types such as NK and CD8+ memory T cells [23],[24]. As shown in Figure 1A, the number of iNKT cells in Il17rb −/− mice was only slightly decreased in the spleen, and was almost comparable in the liver, compared with B6 mice, findings consistent with our previous analysis on the distribution of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells (3%–5% in the spleen and almost none in the liver) as detected by a specific monoclonal antibody [17]. Similarly, Il15 L117P mice appear to recapitulate the previously reported phenotype of Il15 −/− mice [21],[22] because iNKT and NK cells were decreased by 50% in the spleen and by 90% in the liver, indicating that the L117P mutation resulted in the loss of IL-15 function.
We then analyzed the frequency of IL-17RB+ subtypes among α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ iNKT cells in the spleen and liver of WT, Il17rb −/−, and Il15 L117P mice (Figure 1B). The percentage of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells was increased more than 4 times in the spleen and 10 times in liver of the Il15 L117P mice.
By using Il17rb −/− and Il15 L117P mice, we further analyzed the iNKT cell subtypes in terms of their ability to produce cytokines (Figure 1C and 1D). α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ TCRβ+ iNKT cells from the spleen of WT, Il17rb −/−, and Il15 L117P mice (Figure 1C) and those from the liver of B6 and Il17rb −/− mice (Figure 1D) were sorted and co-cultured with GM-CSF-induced bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BM-DCs) in the presence of α-GalCer. The Il17rb −/− iNKT cells produced normal levels of IFN-γ, but this was significantly decreased in Il15 L117P iNKT cells. Intriguingly, there was impaired production of not only TH2 cytokines such as IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13, but also of TH17 cytokines IL-17A and IL-22 in Il17rb −/− iNKT cells, but not in Il15 L117P iNKT cells in the spleen (Figure 1C and 1D), even though the number of iNKT cells were only slightly decreased in Il17rb −/− (see Figure 1A). The iNKT cells derived from WT, Il17rb −/−, or Il15 L117P failed to produce any indicated cytokines when co-cultured with BM-DCs from Cd1d1 −/− mice (unpublished data), indicating the cytokine production from iNKT cells are absolutely CD1d/α-GalCer dependent.
To examine the functional activity of Il17rb −/− iNKT cells in vivo, we administered α-GalCer (2 µg) intravenously (i.v.) and monitored serum cytokine levels (Figure 1E). The production of IFN-γ peaked normally at 12 to 24 h after stimulation in the Il17rb −/− mice. On the other hand, the production (around 1–6 h) of other cytokines, such as IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22, was severely impaired in the Il17rb −/− mice. The results suggest that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are distinct from IL-17RB− iNKT cells, which mainly produce IFN-γ, and also that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells produce IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13 among TH2 cytokines and IL-17A and IL-22 TH17-type cytokines.
Development of IL-17RB+ and IL-17RB− iNKT Subtypes in the Thymus
iNKT cells in the spleen and liver from il17rb −/− mice are defective in the production of IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22, while IFN-γ production is diminished in Il15 L117P iNKT cells (Figure 1). We therefore attempted to identify the origin of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in the thymus by comparing α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ iNKT cells in B6 with those in Il17rb −/− and in Il15 L117P mice on a B6 background (Figure 2A). The percentage and number of iNKT cells in the thymus were severely decreased in Il15 L117P mice to a similar extent as previously reported in Il15 −/− mice [21]. By contrast, the percentage and number of iNKT cells in Il17rb −/− mice was only slightly decreased, to a similar extent to that seen in the spleen and liver (Figure 1C and 1D). In order to analyze their phenotype precisely, enriched α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ iNKT cells were further divided based on the expression of CD44 and NK1.1 (Figure 2B), because iNKT cells can be classified into developmental stages based on the cell surface expression of these molecules, i.e., CD44lo NK1.1− (Stage 1), CD44hi NK1.1− (Stage 2), and CD44hi NK1.1+ (Stage 3) [14],[25]. In agreement with earlier results [21], there was a decrease in the CD44hi NK1.1+ (Stage 3) population of α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ iNKT cells in the thymus of Il15 L117P mice. By contrast, the percentage and number of iNKT cells in Il17rb −/− mice were reduced, especially in the CD44lo NK1.1− (Stage 1) and CD44hi NK1.1− (Stage 2) populations, although the CD44hi NK1.1+ (Stage 3) population was unchanged (Figure 2B). To determine whether the reduction in absolute numbers of developmental Stages 1 and 2 iNKT cell populations in Il17rb −/− mice is due to a developmental defect or to bypassing of these developmental stages, we analyzed surface expression of IL-17RB and CD122, a receptor for IL-15 (Figure 2C). Consistent with the observation shown in Figure 2B, IL-17RB expression was detected mainly in the Stage 1 and Stage 2 populations in both CD4− and CD4+ fractions (Figure 2C), whereas CD122 expression was mainly in the Stage 3 population as previously reported [21], and is inversely correlated with the expression of IL-17RB (Figure 2C). In order to investigate whether IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are distinct from IL-15-dependent iNKT cells, thymic iNKT cells from B6 and Il15 L117P mice were divided based on the expression of IL-17RB and CD4, and were further analyzed in the expression of CD44 and NK1.1 (Figure 2D and 2E). The percentage of CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells was higher in Il15 L117P mice (Figure 2D), due to the reduction in the numbers of IL-17RB− iNKT cells. Concerning the distribution of the expression of CD44 and NK1.1 in iNKT cell subtypes, even though IL-17RB+ iNKT cells comprised only ∼10% of the thymic iNKT cells, more than half of them were Stage 2, while almost all (>97%) of the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells were Stage 3 (Figure 2E). Furthermore, more than 80% of Stage 1/2 iNKT cells were IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, while only ∼2% of the Stage 3 iNKT cells were IL-17RB+ (Figure 2D). The percentage (Figure 2F) and absolute number (Figure 2G) of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells among the total iNKT cells and in developmental Stages 1 and 2 were similar to those of Il15 L117P mice, while those of IL-17RB− iNKT cells (i.e., CD122+ iNKT cells) among the total and in developmental Stage 3 were also comparable to those in Il17rb −/− mice, indicating that two distinct iNKT cell subsets are present in the different stages of iNKT cell development, i.e., the IL-17RB+ subtype in Stages 1 and 2 and the CD122+ subtype in Stage 3.
In order to determine if iNKT cell subtypes arise as a distinct population in the thymus of each other, each subtype in Stage 1 or Stage 2 was sorted and co-cultured with a fetal thymus (FT) lobe from Jα18 −/− mice (Figure 2H and 2I). IL-17RB− subtype in Stage 1 gave rise to cells in Stage 2 and Stage 3 with IL-17RB− phenotype (Figure 2H and 2I, lower left), whereas IL-17RB+ subtype in Stage 1 gave rise to cells in Stage 2 but not to Stage 3 with IL-17RB+ phenotype (Figure 2H and 2I, upper left). Furthermore, IL-17RB− subtype in Stage 2 gave rise to cells in Stage 3 with IL-17RB− phenotype (Figure 2H and 2I, lower left), whereas IL-17RB+ subtype in Stage 2 kept in Stage 2 with IL-17RB+ phenotype (Figure 2H and 2I, upper left), indicating that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells arise in the thymus as distinct phenotypic subtypes from IL-17RB− iNKT cells, which undergo a series of developmental stages (i.e. Stages 1–3) previously characterized [14],[15].
To confirm the differences among subtypes of iNKT cells, we compared global gene expression profiles in WT B6 CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ or IL-17RB−, iNKT cells to each other (Figure S2A), and also WT B6 CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells to the same cell types from Il15 L117P mice (Figure S2B). The genome-wide expression profile of the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells were similar to each other but different from those of CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells (Figure S2A). Moreover, the gene expression profiles of CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ WT iNKT cells were similar to those in Il15 L117P mice (Figure S2B). Therefore, it is likely that IL-17RB+ iNKT cell development in the thymus is distinct from the IL-17RB− (i.e. CD122+) iNKT cells. The gene expression profiles of the CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells were quite similar to those of the CD4− IL-17RB+ cells rather than the CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells (Figure S2A), suggesting that these two subtypes, CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, develop from the same precursors, whereas the precursors for IL-17RB− iNKT cells are distinct.
In order to investigate functional differences in the IL-17RB+ and IL-17RB− subsets of iNKT cells, we analyzed the ability of thymic iNKT cells in B6, Il17rb −/− and Il15 L117P mice to produce cytokines in response to α-GalCer (Figure S3). IFN-γ was produced at similar levels by Il17rb −/− and WT iNKT cells, but was greatly reduced in the Il15 L117P iNKT cells, while the production of IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22 was impaired in the Il17rb −/− but not in the Il15 L117P iNKT cells, similar to what we had observed in the spleen and liver (Figure S3).
Dominant Development of IL-17RB+ iNKT Subtypes in TH2-Prone BALB/c Mice
In a previous study, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells were fairly abundant in the spleen of TH2-prone mice, but were barely detectable in TH1-prone mice [17]. Thus, we examined whether the frequency of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in the thymus of BALB/c mice is different from that of B6 mice. Intriguingly, more than one-third of thymic iNKT cells were IL-17RB+ in TH2-prone BALB/c mice, four times higher than in TH1-prone B6 mice (Figure S4A). The genome-wide expression profiles of CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in BALB/c were similar to each other, but different from those of CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells (Figure S4B). Cluster analysis also showed that CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ or IL-17RB− iNKT cells in B6 and BALB/c mice were essentially equivalent (Figure S4C).
Genetic Analysis of iNKT Cell Subtypes in the Thymus
iNKT cells in the thymus can be divided into four populations based on their expression of CD4 and IL-17RB (Figures 2D and S4A), and thymic Il17rb −/− iNKT cells had a decreased ability to produce TH2 and TH17 cytokines (Figure S3). Therefore, we analyzed the function of iNKT cell subtypes in the thymus of B6 (Figure 3) and BALB/c mice (Figure S5). We first used quantitative real-time PCR to investigate TH1/TH2/TH17-related gene expression patterns in FACS sorted thymic iNKT subtypes. The levels of Cd4 and Il17rb transcripts were correlated with the surface expression of these molecules (Figures 3A and S5A). Il2rb ( = Cd122) expression was restricted to CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cell subtypes (Figures 3A and S5A) in correlation with their surface protein expression (Figure 2C). The expression levels of TH1-related transcripts, such as Ifng, Tbx21, and Stat4, were more than 10 times higher in those of CD4− and CD4+ IL-17RB− iNKT cells. Higher levels of TH2-related transcripts, such as Il4, were detected in CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, even though Gata3, a transcription factor essential for TH2 cytokine production, was expressed at a similar level in all subtypes (Figures 3B and S5B). On the other hand, the expression of TH17-related transcripts, such as Il17a, Il22, and Rorc, were restricted to the CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells (Figures 3B and S5B).
We then investigated the gene expression level in cells derived from Stages 1 and 2 by FT organ culture (Figure 2H and 2I). Consistent with the findings above, Ifng expression was restricted to the cells derived from CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT precursors (Figure S6A and S6B). Higher levels of Il4 were detected in CD4+ IL-17RB+ derived cells and restricted expression of Il17a in cells derived from CD4− IL-17RB+ precursors (Figure S6A and S6B), supporting each subtype arise from Stage 1 as a functionally distinct subtype.
Based on these findings, we analyzed potential production of cytokines from these thymic iNKT cell subtypes. Sorted iNKT cell subtypes were stimulated with PMA plus ionomycin (Figure S7A). Similar to the cytokine expression, IFN-γ was exclusively produced by the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− subtypes, while IL-10 and IL-13 were mainly produced by the CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells and IL-17A was produced predominantly by CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells. It should be noted that all four subtypes have a potential to produce IL-4, in correlation with their mRNA expression of Il4 and Gata3 (Figures 3B and S5B).
We then further analyzed cytokine production after α-GalCer activation. Sorted iNKT cell subtypes were co-cultured with BM-DCs in the presence of α-GalCer (Figures 3C and S5C). IFN-γ was exclusively produced by the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− subtypes, while IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13 were mainly produced by the CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells. Similarly, IL-17A and IL-22 were produced predominantly by CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells. These cytokine production patterns correlated with their differential expression of TH1/TH2/TH17-related genes in the different iNKT subtypes.
We also analyzed the expression profiles of cytokine receptor genes. Il12rb2 transcript was expressed in CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells, and Il23r expression was restricted to CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells (Figures 3D and S5D), suggesting that CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells respond to IL-12 through IL-12Rβ2/IL-12Rβ1, while CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells respond to IL-23 through IL-23R/IL-12Rβ1. In fact, CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells produced large amounts of IFN-γ but not TH2 and TH17 cytokines in response to IL-12 (Figures 3E and S5E), while CD4− IL17RB+ iNKT cells produced large amounts of TH17 cytokines, IL-17A and IL-22, but not IFN-γ and TH2 cytokines in response to IL-23 (Figures 3F and S5F). IL-25-mediated activity requires not only IL-17RB but also IL-17RA expression [26], which is expressed on all iNKT cell subtypes (Figures 3D and S5D). IL-25 acts on thymic CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells to induce a large amount of TH2 cytokines, along with moderate amounts of TH17 cytokines (Figures 3G and S5G) similar to previous observations in the CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cell subtype in the spleen [17]. Interestingly, however, IL-25 does not stimulate CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, despite their expression of IL-17RB (Figures 3G and S5G). We also found that cytokine production from iNKT cells in these experimental settings was hardly observed when BM-DCs derived from Cd1d1 −/− mice (unpublished data), indicating signals from TCR are also required for cytokine production from iNKT cells. These results suggest that three types of iNKT cells, i.e. CD4− IL-17RB+ (iNKT-TH17, IL-23 reactive), CD4+ IL-17RB+ (iNKT-TH2/17, IL-25 reactive), and CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− (iNKT-TH1, IL-12 reactive), exist as distinct subpopulations in the thymus.
The chemokine receptor expression patterns are also distinct among thymic iNKT cell subtypes. Ccr4 and Ccr7 expression was restricted to both CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, and Ccr6 expression was only observed on CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells (Figures 3H and S5H). Cxcr3 expression was several times higher on IL-17RB− iNKT cells than on the other subtypes. Surprisingly, the expression of Cxcr6, which has been reported to be abundantly expressed by all iNKT cells [27],[28], was also restricted to the IL-17RB− iNKT cells (Figures 3H and S5H). Note that the expression patterns and levels of all of the genes tested were almost equivalent between B6 and BALB/c mice, consistent with our finding that all iNKT subtypes are present in these strains.
Distribution of iNKT Subtypes in the Periphery
Distinct expression of chemokine receptors among thymic iNKT cell subtypes (Figures 3H and S5H) may reflect the differential distribution of iNKT cell subtypes in the periphery. We thus investigated the frequency of total iNKT cells and subtypes in the spleen, liver, BM, lung, inguinal lymph node (LN), and mesenteric LN in WT B6, BALB/c, and Il17rb −/− mice (Figures 4 and S8). The absolute number and percentage of iNKT cells were slightly decreased in the spleen, lung, inguinal LN, and mesenteric LN of Il17rb −/− mice, but were unchanged compared to WT mice in liver and BMs (Figures 4A and S8A). We then gated on α-GalCer/CD1d dimer+ TCRβ+ iNKT cells and further analyzed them for the expression of CD44 and NK1.1 in B6 background mice (Figure 4B). The percentage of NK1.1− subtype cells was higher in the spleen, lung, inguinal LN, and mesenteric LN, but lower in the liver and BM, and was decreased in Il17rb −/− mice, suggesting that the majority of iNKT cell subtypes maintain surface expression of NK1.1− after emigration from the thymus (Figure 2B). Similarly, we examined the expression of CD4 and IL-17RB on the iNKT subtypes (Figures 4C and S8B). Interestingly, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells were abundant in the lung, inguinal LN, and mesenteric LN, but barely detectable in the liver and BM of both B6 and BALB/c mice. More than 40% of iNKT cells were IL-17RB+ in the lung, inguinal LN, and mesenteric LN, whereas more than 90% were IL-17RB− in the liver and BM (Figures 4C and S8B). Therefore, the distribution patterns of the iNKT cell subtypes are distinct in the tissues. In agreement with a previous study [21], we found that the number of iNKT cells was decreased in the spleen (∼1/3) and liver (∼1/30) in Il15 L117P mice (Figure S9A). Reduction of iNKT cell number was also observed in BM (∼1/8) in these mice (Figure S9A), probably due to the selective reduction of the IL-17RB− subtypes (Figure S9B). We finally compared iNKT cell subtypes in the thymus and periphery of B6 and BALB/c mice (Figure 4D). The total iNKT cell number was almost equivalent between these two strains, but BALB/c had ∼4 times more CD4+ IL-17RB+ subtype cells, but lower (∼1/3) numbers of CD4− IL-17RB− cells, resulting in a higher number of CD4+ IL-17RB+ cells in the spleen (∼5 times), lung (∼2 times), inguinal LN (∼1.5 times), mesenteric LN (∼4 times), and lower numbers of CD4− IL-17RB− cells, especially in liver (∼1/6) and BM (∼2/5) of BALB/c mice (Figure 4D).
To confirm the distribution profiles of each subtype in the periphery, we performed intracellular cytokine staining after PMA plus ionomycin stimulation (Figure S7B) and quantitative real-time PCR analysis (Figure S10A–D) on these iNKT cells that were tested in the thymic iNKT cell subtypes (Figures 3A, 3B, 3D, 3H, S7A). The gene expression profiles and potential cytokine production in the iNKT cell subtypes were almost equivalent among those in the different peripheral tissues, but higher than those in the thymus, strongly suggesting that each iNKT subtype in the periphery is derived from the same iNKT subtypes in the thymus.
IL-17RB+ iNKT Cells as TH2/TH17-Producing iNKT Subtypes
We next compared global gene expression profiles of CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ or IL-17RB− iNKT subtypes in the thymus and spleen in order to test whether each subtype is functionally and phenotypically stable or plastic. Each of the four subtypes in spleen was highly correlated with the corresponding subtype in the thymus (Figure 5A), suggesting that iNKT subtypes can be divided by CD4 and IL-17RB expression both in the thymus and the periphery. Furthermore, iNKT cell subtypes in the periphery (Figure S10) showed similar quantitative gene expression profiles as in the thymus (Figure 3).
In order to confirm the stability and plasticity of iNKT cell subtypes, we sorted thymic iNKT cell subtypes based on the expression of CD4 and IL-17RB from WT B6 and transferred them into iNKT cell-deficient Jα18 −/− mice. Ten days after transfer, we analyzed the IL-17RB expression by iNKT cell subtypes in the spleen. The results clearly showed that the majority of transferred cells maintained their surface IL-17RB expression (Figure 5B), suggesting that IL-17RB expression is stable as the cells migrate from the thymus to the periphery.
We further analyzed in cytokine production of splenic iNKT cell subtypes from B6 and BALB/c mice. The cytokine production profiles of splenic iNKT cell subtypes in response to α-GalCer (Figures 5C and S11A), IL-12 (Figures 5D and S11B), IL-23 (Figures 5E and S11C), and IL-25 (Figures 5F and S11D) were quite similar to those of the thymic iNKT cell subtypes (Figures 3C, 3E, 3F, 3G, S5C, S5E, S5F, S5G). Taken together, all of the iNKT subtypes detected in the thymus also exist as phenotypically and functionally distinct subtypes in the peripheral tissues.
E4BP4 Is Required for the Production of IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22 Cytokines by CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT Cells in Response to IL-25
Both thymic and peripheral iNKT cells in the steady state contain Ifng mRNA in the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− cells (Tbx21 expressed, iNKT-TH1, IL-12 reactive), and Il17a and Il22 mRNA in the CD4− IL-17RB+ cells (Rorc expressed, iNKT-TH17, IL-23 reactive). The expression of these cytokine transcripts is thought to result from the fact that peripheral iNKT cells are not truly quiescent, but instead appear to be continuously activated at a low level due to their recognition of endogenous self-glycolipid ligand(s) in vivo. However, the CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells do not contain Il9, Il10, Il13 (unpublished data), Il17a, or Il22 mRNA (Figures 3B, S5B, S10B) in the steady state, even though these cytokines are immediately produced after activation by α-GalCer, similar to cases of IFN-γ from IL-17RB− iNKT cells. These results suggest differences in the transcriptional regulation of cytokine genes in the different iNKT cell subtypes.
One of the candidate genes is E4BP4, a mammalian basic leucine zipper transcription factor that regulates IL-10 and IL-13 production not only by CD4+ T cells and regulatory T cells but also by iNKT cells [29]. E4BP4 expression was markedly induced in IL-25-treated iNKT cells, and its expression level correlated with Il10 and Il13 expression [29]. Furthermore, iNKT cells lacking E4bp4 had reduced expression of IL-10 and IL-13 in response to either IL-25 or α-GalCer stimulation, but the IFN-γ and IL-4 production were unaffected [29], indicating that E4bp4 controls the TH2 cytokine production in a particular iNKT cell subtype.
Therefore, we analyzed the role of E4bp4 in iNKT cell subtypes. The expression of E4bp4 was selectively and strongly induced by IL-25 treatment in CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells both from thymus and spleen (Figure 6B). However, CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells failed to induce E4bp4 expression even after treatment with IL-23 (Figure 6B), suggesting the cell type-specific function of E4bp4 and its possible role not only in Il10 and Il13 expression but also in Il9, Il17a, and Il22 expression by IL-25-treated CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed cytokine production by CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells lacking E4bp4 after treatment with IL-25 in the presence of BM-DCs (Figure 6C). The production of IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22 cytokines by both thymic or splenic CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in response to IL-25 was completely abrogated, indicating E4BP4 turned out to be an intrinsic regulator of IL-25-mediated production, not only of IL-10 and IL-13 but also of IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-22.
Involvement of IL-17RB+ iNKT Cells in the Pathogenesis of Virus-Induced AHR
We then investigated the role of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in the pathogenesis of virus-induced AHR, which is known to be different from allergen-induced AHR [30]. Certain viruses, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Sendai virus, metapneumovirus, and parainfluenza virus, cause childhood asthma and COPD-like symptoms, which include AHR, airway inflammation, and mucus hypersecretion [31]–[33]. However, it has been very difficult to understand how such symptoms develop, even long after the apparent clearance of viruses. It has been reported that, in mouse models of infection with parainfluenza virus or Sendai virus, virus-induced chronic inflammation leads to asthma that resembles human asthma and COPD [34]. The chronic pulmonary symptoms evolved independently of CD4+ T cells but required CD4− iNKT cells and did not occur in Cd1d −/− and Jα18 −/− mice [34].
Therefore, we attempted to determine whether or not the CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are responsible for chronic inflammatory lung disease induced by RSV infection. We used the secreted form of recombinant G protein of RSV (rec Gs) (Figure S12) as an immunogen because priming with a recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) expressing rec Gs induced a more TH2-biased response and enhanced pulmonary eosinophil and macrophage infiltration following RSV challenge than did priming with rVV expressing either wild-type G or membrane anchored G (Gm) proteins [35],[36]. Mice were inoculated i.n. with RSV (106 pfu/100 µl) or PBS as a control four times at 10-d intervals and were intraperitoneally (i.p.) immunized with rec Gs/alum (50 µg/2 mg) 4 d after the first RSV infection. Three days after the last RSV administration, mice were exposed i.n. to 50 µg rec Gs and then, 24 h later, measured for AHR (Figure 7A). In this experimental setting, RSV/rec Gs-induced AHR was observed in WT BALB/c but not in Jα18 −/− or Il17rb −/− mice, which had a similar response level as PBS/rec Gs-induced WT controls, indicating that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells contribute to the development of RSV plus viral antigen-induced AHR (Figure 7B). Airway macrophage and lymphocyte numbers, which were relatively higher than eosinophils and neutrophils, were recruited into the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of RSV/rec Gs-induced WT mice but not the other mice (Figure 7C). These results suggest that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are required for the development of RSV-induced AHR. Low level of cytokines (IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22) in the BAL fluid was detected in this experiment (Figure 7D). The production of IL-13 and IL-22, which plays a crucial role in the activation of macrophages and neutrophils, respectively, was detected higher in RSV/rec Gs-induced WT mice. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the lung tissue revealed that a large number of inflammatory mononuclear cells had infiltrated into the peribronchiolar region, a response that was higher in RSV/rec Gs-induced WT mice compared to RSV/rec Gs-induced Jα18 −/− or Il17rb −/−, mice (Figure 7E, upper panel). By periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining, mucus-producing cells were abundant only in RSV/rec Gs-induced BALB/c mice but not in Jα18 −/− or Il17rb −/− mice (Figure 7E, lower panel). To confirm the findings that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are essential for the development of RSV/rec Gs-induced AHR, we transferred enriched splenic IL-17RB+ iNKT cells into Jα18 −/− mice and tested their ability to develop AHR (Figure 7F). The cell transfer of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, but not IL-17RB− iNKT cells nor PBS alone, restored AHR induced by RSV plus rec Gs, dependent of cell number transferred, demonstrating the important contribution of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in the pathogenesis of development in virus plus viral antigen-induced AHR.
Discussion
In the present study, we identified IL-17RB− and IL-17RB+ subtypes of iNKT cells both in the thymus and the periphery. The IL-17RB− iNKT cells express CD122 (IL-15Rβ chain), expand in an IL-15-dependent manner, and produce IFN-γ in response to IL-12. On the other hand, the IL-17RB+ iNKT cells do not express CD122 or respond to IL-15. The IL-17RB+ iNKT cells can be further divided into at least two subtypes: (1) CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells produce TH2, TH9, and TH17 cytokines in an E4BP4-dependent fashion in response to IL-25, and (2) CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are RORγt+ and produce TH17 cytokines in response to IL-23, but independently of E4BP4. In the thymus, the IL-17RB+ iNKT cells have a developmental pathway distinct from the IL-17RB− iNKT cells.
It has been proposed that iNKT cell differentiation stages can be categorized based on the expression patterns of CD44 and NK1.1, for example CD44lo NK1.1− for Stage 1, CD44hi NK1.1− for Stage 2, and CD44hi NK1.1+ for Stage 3 [14],[25]. However, the majority (>80%) of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells was present in both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 subsets, while IL-17RB− iNKT cells were enriched in Il17rb −/− mice and were mainly detected in Stage 3, suggesting that a certain but not all of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are not precursors for the Stage 3 cells. It is believed that iNKT cells acquire their ability to produce IL-4 and IL-10, but make little IFN-γ in Stages 1/2 populations, whereas iNKT cells in Stage 3 produce abundant IFN-γ but less if any IL-10 [14],[15],[25],[37]. These finding are in agreement with the present results that the Stage 1/2 populations mainly contain IL-17RB+ iNKT cells that can produce IL-4 and IL-10, but not IFN-γ, whereas the majority of the Stage 3 iNKT cells are IL-17RB− iNKT cells producing IFN-γ but not TH2 cytokines. The results shown here also indicated that all of the four iNKT subtypes already existed in Stage 1 and developed into phenotypically and functionally distinct iNKT cells as CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ in Stage 2 and CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB− through Stage 2 to Stage 3.
It has reported that IL-15 plays an important role in the expansion of iNKT cells [21]. Our present data showed that IL-15 requires only for the expansion of IL-17RB− iNKT cell subtypes but not for IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, even though it has still been unclear that the cytokine(s) are required for the development and expansion of IL-17RB+ subtypes. In fact, IL-17RB− iNKT cell subtypes were greatly reduced in number among iNKT cell subtypes but already had an ability to produce IFN-γ in Il15 L117P mice, resulting in the reduced IFN-γ production after iNKT cell activation due to the reduced number of these subtypes.
In the previous reports, the IL-17A-producing subtypes were proposed to be contained within the CD44hi NK1.1− CD4− RORγt+ subpopulation [8],[19]. In the present studies, we found that the CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cell subtype is CD44hi NK1.1− CD4− (about 50%–70% of the cells are IL-17RB+) and has a restricted expression of Il17a, Rorc, Ccr6, and Il23r genes, for a phenotype similar to the previously reported CD44+ NK1.1− CD4− RORγt+ population that produces IL-17A [19],[38]. These results indicate that IL-17RB (and CD4−) is a reliable and specific phenotypic marker for RORγt+ IL-17A-producing iNKT cells in the thymus.
In the periphery, the tissue distribution of the iNKT cell subtypes seems to largely depend on the expression of chemokine receptors: CCR6+ CCR4+ CCR7+ expression by CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, CCR4+ CCR7+ expression by CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, and CXCR3+ CXCR6+ by CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells. Indeed, the number of liver iNKT cells, the majority of which are the CD4− and CD4+, IL-17RB− iNKT cells identified here, depends on the chemokine receptor CXCR6, whereas iNKT cells in other tissues are less dependent as reported [27],[28]. In Ccr4 −/− mice, the lung has fewer iNKT cells and a corresponding reduction in iNKT cell-mediated AHR [39], implicating the reduction of pulmonary localization of IL-17RB+ iNKT cells.
IL-17A-producing iNKT cells have been described in other studies in the thymus, liver, spleen, lung, LNs, and skin [8],[19],[20],[38],[40]. In these studies, it was suggested that all NK1.1− iNKT cells have the potential to secrete IL-17A. However, in the present study, we show heterogeneity among NK1.1− iNKT cells. Accordingly, CD4− but not CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells correspond to the IL-17A-producing iNKT cells previously reported, as does the exclusive expression of Ccr6 along with Itgae ( = Cd103) and Il1r1 ( = Cd121a) in CD4− IL-17RB+ iNKT cells (unpublished data) [40].
CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells produce not only the previously described IL-13 and IL-4 [17],[18] but also IL-9 and IL-10 along with IL-17A and IL-22 in response to IL-25 in an E4BP4-dependent fashion. Even though it is still unclear whether IL-25-reactive CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells can be further divided into differentially functional subsets (i.e. iNKT-TH2, iNKT-TH9, iNKT-TH17), it is noteworthy that a recently described subset of differentiated T cells [41], termed TH9, which can be induced by IL-4 plus TGF-β, produces IL-9 and IL-10 in response to IL-25. This IL-9 production is IL-4 independent, highlighting the role of IL-25 in the regulation of both TH2 and TH9 cells [42]. We demonstrated here that IL-25 induces not only IL-13 and IL-4 but also IL-9 and IL-10 from CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells, which can thus be characterized as iNKT-TH2 and iNKT-TH9 cells. Concerning the cytokine production by CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cells in response to IL-25, not only IL-10 and IL-13 but also IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-22 were attenuated in the absence of E4bp4, recently defined as a transcription factor that regulates IL-10 and IL-13 production by CD4+ T cells and iNKT cells [29], suggesting that E4BP4 also controls IL-25-mediated production of IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-22. Although the precise mechanisms by which IL-25 mediates cytokine expression still remains unclear, E4BP4 itself directly or indirectly controls IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, and IL-22 expression by genetic/epigenetic regulation in CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT subtypes. It will be of interest to determine if E4BP4 regulates IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-22 production by CD4+ TH cells. Taken collectively, our studies indicate that CD4− or CD4+, IL-17RB+ iNKT cells become functionally stable iNKT-TH17 or iNKT-TH2/9/17, respectively, during their development.
The study described here indicates that iNKT cell-mediated AHR was not induced by viral infections in Jα18 −/− or Il17rb −/− mice, suggesting that IL-17RB+ iNKT cells are responsible for the pathogenesis of many different forms of airway inflammation. Although distinct subsets of iNKT cells have been reported to be involved in different forms of asthma [17],[18],[34],[43], they are now consolidated into CD4− and/or CD4+ IL-17RB+ iNKT cell subsets.
iNKT cells are also known to mediate regulatory functions controlling various pathological conditions, such as infectious diseases caused by microbes [44], autoimmune diseases (colitis, lupus, diabetes) [45],[46], atherosclerosis [47], and malignancy [48]. It will be interesting to elucidate whether subsets of iNKT cells play differential roles in mediating and controlling these diverse pathological conditions.
Materials and Methods
Mice
B6 and BALB/c mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories or Clea Japan, Inc. Il17rb-deficient mice were generated as shown in Figure S1 and were backcrossed >8 times to B6 or BALB/c mice. Il15 L117P mutant mice were produced by N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis by ENU administration to male C57BL/6J mice, and their sperm was mated to wild-type eggs and preserved as founder embryos [49],[50]. Jα18-deficient mice were generated as previously described [51] and were backcrossed >10 times to B6 or BALB/c mice. Cd1d1-deficient mice [52] were provided by Dr. Luc van Kaer (Nashville, TN). E4bp4-deficient mice were generated as previously described and were backcrossed 8 times to B6 mice [29]. All mice were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions and were used at 8–16 wk of age. All experiments were in accordance with protocols approved by the RIKEN Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cytokine Measurement
Cytokines except IL-22 in culture supernatants and BAL fluids were analyzed by cytometric bead array (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol. IL-22 was quantified by an ELISA reagent set (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting
Cells were analyzed by FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) or FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and sorted by FACS Aria (BD Biosciences). Antibodies (BD Biosciences or eBioscience) used for staining mouse cells were as follows: FITC or APC-Cy7 anti-TCRβ (H57-597), Pacific blue anti-CD4 (RM4-5), FITC anti-CD44 (IM7), PE-Cy7 anti-NK1.1 (PK136), PE anti-CD122 (TM-β1), FITC anti-CD8α (53-6.7), PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-CD25 (PC61), PE anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), PE anti-IL-4 (11B11), PE anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3), PE anti-IL-13 (eBio13A), PE anti-IL-17A (TC11-18H10), and PE rat IgG1 (A110-1). Biotinylated anti-mouse IL-17RB (B5F6) was generated previously [17] and detected by staining with PE or PE-Cy7 Avidin (BD Biosciences). APC α-GalCer loaded CD1d dimer (BD Biosciences) for iNKT cell enrichment and detection was prepared as previously described [53].
Coculture with a FT lobe
The procedures for the coculture with a deoxyguanosine (dGuo)-treated FT lobe under high oxygen submersion conditions have been described in detail previously [54],[55]. Basically, single dGuo-treated FT lobes from Jα18 −/− of B6 background were placed into wells of a 96-well V-bottom plate, to which cells from B6 mice to be examined were added. Culture medium was supplemented with IL-7 (1 ng/ml), IL-15 (10 ng/ml), and soluble IL-15Rα (10 ng/ml). The plates were centrifuged at 150× g for 5 min at room temperature, placed into a plastic bag (Ohmi Odor Air Service), the air inside was replaced by a gas mixture (70% O2, 25% N2, and 5% CO2), and incubated at 37°C. After 10 d of culture, cells were harvested from each well and analyzed by FACS and quantitative real-time PCR.
Intracellular Cytokine Staining
Intracellular cytokine staining was performed as described previously [53]. For cytokine production from sorted iNKT cell subtypes, Brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) was added for the last 4 to 5 h of culture to accumulate intracellular cytokines after PMA (25 ng/ml, Sigma) with ionomycin (1 µg/ml, Sigma) treatment. Following fixation with Cytofix/Cytoperm plus (BD Biosciences), cells were stained for indicated intracellular cytokines for 15 min at room temperature.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
PCR primers and probes were designed with Universal ProbeLibrary Assay (Roche) or with TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems). Sequence of primers and probes in the latter case are shown in Table S1. PCR was performed with the TaqMan universal master mix with ROX (Applied Biosystems) according to the protocol provided. ABI PRISM7900HT Fast system (Applied Biosystems) or Biomark system (Fludigm) was used for quantitative real-time PCR according to the manufacturer's instructions. To ensure the specificity of the amplification products, a melting curve analysis was performed. Results were normalized and analyzed by ΔCt or ΔΔCt methods using the internal control gene Hprt1.
Correlation Analysis of Microarrays
Gene expression detected using microarrays was normalized by the quantile normalization method [56]. Pearson's correlation values of logarithms of all signal intensities from 45,101 probes were calculated, and we performed hierarchal clustering of correlation matrices to indicate the degree of similarity between cell types. Scatter diagrams were drawn to display how similarly or differently genes were expressed in two samples. These diagrams contain only probes whose signals were present and coefficient values were shown in the figures.
RSV-Induced AHR
Strain A2 of human RSV was used in this study. The general protocol for analyzing airway remodeling during RSV infection in mice is as follows: AHR was induced by sensitizing and challenging with OVA/alum (3–4 times) and/or infection with RSV (3–4 times), and then challenging with OVA, resulting in the examination of various pathological endpoints as previously described [57]–[59]. In the present study, we modified these protocols in order to analyze the physiological role of iNKT cells in the development of AHR mediated by RSV. In brief, mice were i.n. administered with RSV (106 pfu) or PBS as a control 4 times at 10-d intervals. Mice were i.p. immunized with rec Gs/alum (50 µg/2 mg) 4 d after first RSV infections. Three days after the last RSV administration, mice were exposed i.n. to rec Gs recombinant protein and AHR responses were measured 1 d later.
Measurement of Airway Responsiveness
Airway function was measured for changes in lung resistance (RL) and dynamic compliance in response to increasing doses of inhaled methacholine (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg/ml) by using an invasive FlexiVent (SCIREQ Scientific Respiratory Equipment Inc.).
Lymphocyte Isolation and Analysis of BAL Fluid
After measurement of AHR and sacrifice, the mouse trachea was cannulated, the lungs were lavaged twice with 1 ml PBS (10-fold PBS dilution), and the BAL fluid was pooled as previously described [30]. Lymphocytes from thymus, spleen, liver, lung, BM, inguinal LN, and mesenteric LN were isolated as described previously [53].
Statistical Analysis
The statistical significance of differences was determined by t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), or the Kruskal-Wallis test. The values were expressed as means ± SEM from independent experiments. Any differences with a p value of <0.05 were considered significant (* p<0.05; ** p<0.01).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Inoue, K. Kakimoto, S. Sakata, and Y. Nagata for technical assistance; T. Tashiro and K. Mori for α-GalCer synthesis; P. D. Burrows for comments on the manuscript; and N. Takeuchi for secretarial assistance.
Abbreviations
- α-GalCer
α-Galactosylceramide
- AHR
airway hyperreactivity
- BAL
bronchoalveolar lavage
- iNKT
invariant natural killer T
- ROR
retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor
- RSV
respiratory syncytial virus
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), Japan Science and Technology to HW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Taniguchi M, Harada M, Kojo S, Nakayama T, Wakao H. The regulatory role of Valpha14 NKT cells in innate and acquired immune response. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:483–513. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lantz O, Bendelac A. An invariant T cell receptor alpha chain is used by a unique subset of major histocompatibility complex class I-specific CD4+ and CD4−8− T cells in mice and humans. J Exp Med. 1994;180:1097–1106. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.3.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Exley M, Garcia J, Balk S. P, Porcelli S. Requirements for CD1d recognition by human invariant Va24+CD4−CD8− T cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186:109–120. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bendelac A. Positive selection of mouse NK1+ T cells by CD1-expressing cortical thymocytes. J Exp Med. 1995;182:2091–2096. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.6.2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bendelac A, Lantz O, Quimby M. E, Yewdell J. W, Bennink J. R, et al. CD1 recognition by mouse NK1+ T lymphocytes. Science. 1995;268:863–865. doi: 10.1126/science.7538697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bendelac A, Savage P. B, Teyton L. The biology of NKT cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:297–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taniguchi M, Seino K, Nakayama T. The NKT cell system: bridging innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:1164–1165. doi: 10.1038/ni1203-1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Michel M. L, Keller A. C, Paget C, Fujio M, Trottein F, et al. Identification of an IL-17-producing NK1.1neg iNKT cell population involved in airway neutrophilia. J Exp Med. 2007;204:995–1001. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morita M, Motoki K, Akimoto K, Natori T, Sakai T, et al. Structure-activity relationship of α-galactosylceramides against B16-bearing mice. J Med Chem. 1995;38:2176–2187. doi: 10.1021/jm00012a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawano T, Cui J, Koezuka Y, Toura I, Kaneko Y, et al. CD1d-restricted and TCR-mediated activation of Vα14 NKT cells by glycosylceramides. Science. 1997;278:1626–1629. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Godfrey D. I, MacDonald H. R, Kronenberg M, Smyth M. J, VanKaer L. NKT cells: what's in a name? Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:231–237. doi: 10.1038/nri1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gumperz J. E, Miyake S, Yamamura T, Brenner M. B. Functionally distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells revealed by CD1d tetramer staining. J Exp Med. 2002;195:625–636. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee P. T, Benlagha K, Teyton L, Bendelac A. Distinct functional lineages of human Va24 natural killer T cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195:637–641. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benlagha K, Kyin T, Beavis A, Teyton L, Bendelac A. A thymic precursor to the NKT cell lineage. Science. 2002;296:553–555. doi: 10.1126/science.1069017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pellicci D. G, Hammond K. J, Uldrich A. P, Baxter A. G, Smyth M. J, et al. A natural killer T (NKT) cell development pathway involving a thymus-dependent NK1.1− CD4+ CD1d-dependent precursor stage. J Exp Med. 2002;195:835–844. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Crowe N. Y, Coquet J. M, Berzins S. P, Kyparissoudis K, Keating R, et al. Differential antitumor immunity mediated by NKT cell subsets in vivo. J Exp Med. 2005;202:1279–1288. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Terashima A, Watarai H, Inoue S, Sekine E, Nakagawa R, et al. A novel subset of mouse NKT cells bearing the IL-17 receptor B responds to IL-25 and contributes to airway hyperreactivity. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2727–2733. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stock P, Lombardi V, Kohlrautz V, Akbari O. Induction of airway hyperreactivity by IL-25 is dependent on a subset of invariant NKT cells expressing IL-17RB. J Immunol. 2009;182:5116–5122. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coquet J. M, Chakravarti S, Kyparissoudis K, McNab F. W, Pitt L. A, et al. Diverse cytokine production by NKT cell subsets and identification of an IL-17-producing CD4−NK1.1− NKT cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11287–11292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801631105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rachitskaya A. V, Hansen A. M, Horai R, Li Z, Villasmil R, et al. Cutting edge: NKT cells constitutively express IL-23 receptor and RORgammat and rapidly produce IL-17 upon receptor ligation in an IL-6-independent fashion. J Immunol. 2008;180:5167–5171. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Matsuda J. L, Gapin L, Sidobre S, Kieper W. C, Tan J. T, et al. Homeostasis of Va14 iNKT cells. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:966–974. doi: 10.1038/ni837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ranson T, Vosshenrich C. A, Corcuff E, Richard O, Laloux V, et al. IL-15 availability conditions homeostasis of peripheral natural killer T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2663–2668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0535482100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Judge A. D, Zhang X, Fujii H, Surh C. D, Sprent J. Interleukin 15 controls both proliferation and survival of a subset of memory-phenotype CD8(+) T cells. J Exp Med. 2002;196:935–946. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kennedy M. K, Glaccum M, Brown S. N, Butz E. A, Viney J. L, et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 2000;191:771–780. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.5.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benlagha K, Wei D. G, Veiga J, Teyton L, Bendelac A. Characterization of the early stages of thymic NKT cell development. J Exp Med. 2005;202:485–492. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rickel E. A, Siegel L. A, Yoon B. R, Rottman J. B, Kugler D. G, et al. Identification of functional roles for both IL-17RB and IL-17RA in mediating IL-25-induced activities. J Immunol. 2008;181:4299–4310. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.4299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geissmann F, Cameron T. O, Sidobre S, Manlongat N, Kronenberg M, et al. Intravascular immune surveillance by CXCR6+ NKT cells patrolling liver sinusoids. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Germanov E, Veinotte L, Cullen R, Chamberlain E, Butcher E. C, et al. Critical role for the chemokine receptor CXCR6 in homeostasis and activation of CD1d-restricted NKT cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:81–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motomura Y, Kitamura H, Hijikata A, Matsunaga Y, Matsumoto K, et al. The transcription factor E4BP4 regulates the production of IL-10 and IL-13 in CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:450–459. doi: 10.1038/ni.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Akbari O, Stock P, Meyer E, Kronenberg M, Sidobre S, et al. Essential role of NKT cells producing IL-4 and IL-13 in the development of allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. Nat Med. 2003;9:582–588. doi: 10.1038/nm851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gern J. E, Busse W. W. The role of viral infections in the natural history of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:201–212. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.108604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sigurs N, Gustafsson P. M, Bjarnason R, Lundberg F, Schmidt S, et al. Severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in infancy and asthma and allergy at age 13. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:137–141. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-730OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hamelin M. E, Prince G. A, Gomez A. M, Kinkead R, Boivin G. Human metapneumovirus infection induces long-term pulmonary inflammation associated with airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in mice. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1634–1642. doi: 10.1086/504262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim E. Y, Battaile J. T, Patel A. C, You Y, Agapov E, et al. Persistent activation of an innate immune response translates respiratory viral infection into chronic lung disease. Nat Med. 2008;14:633–640. doi: 10.1038/nm1770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bembridge G. P, Garcia-Beato R, López J. A, Melero J. A, Taylor G. Subcellular site of expression and route of vaccination influence pulmonary eosinophilia following respiratory syncytial virus challenge in BALB/c mice sensitized to the attachment G protein. J Immunol. 1998;161:2473–2480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Johnson T. R, Johnson J. E, Roberts S. R, Wertz G. W, Parker R. A, et al. Priming with secreted glycoprotein G of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) augments interleukin-5 production and tissue eosinophilia after RSV challenge. J Virol. 1998;72:2871–2880. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.4.2871-2880.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gadue P, Stein P. L. N.K. T cell precursors exhibit differential cytokine regulation and require Itk for efficient maturation. J Immunol. 2002;169:2397–2406. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Michel M. L, Mendes-da-Cruz D, Keller A. C, Lochner M, Schneider E, et al. Critical role of ROR-γt in a new thymic pathway leading to IL-17-producing invariant NKT cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19845–19850. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806472105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meyer E. H, Wurbel M. A, Staton T. L, Pichavant M, Kan M. J, et al. iNKT cells require CCR4 to localize to the airways and to induce airway hyperreactivity. J Immunol. 2007;179:4661–4671. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Doisne J. M, Becourt C, Amniai L, Duarte N, Le Luduec J. B, et al. Skin and peripheral lymph node invariant NKT cells are mainly retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gt+ and respond preferentially under inflammatory conditions. J Immunol. 2009;183:2142–2149. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Veldhoen M, Uyttenhove C, van Snick J, Helmby H, Westendorf A, et al. Transforming growth factor beta “reprograms” the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1341–1346. doi: 10.1038/ni.1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Angkasekwinai P, Chang S. H, Thapa M, Watarai H, Dong C. Regulation of IL-9 expression by IL-25 signaling. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:250–256. doi: 10.1038/ni.1846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pichavant M, Goya S, Meyer E. H, Johnston R. A, Kim H. Y, et al. Ozone exposure in a mouse model induces airway hyperreactivity that requires the presence of natural killer T cells and IL-17. J Exp Med. 2008;205:385–393. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kinjo Y, Kronenberg M. V alpha 14 iNKT cells are innate lymphocytes that participate in the immune response to diverse microbes. J Clin Immunol. 2005;25:522–533. doi: 10.1007/s10875-005-8064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Novak J, Griseri T, Beaudoin L, Lehuen A. Regulation of Type 1 diabetes by NKT cells. Int Rev Immunol. 2007;26:49–72. doi: 10.1080/08830180601070229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ronchi F, Falcone M. Immune regulation by invariant NKT cells in autoimmunity. Front Biosci. 2008;13:4827–4837. doi: 10.2741/3042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tupin E, Nicoletti A, Elhage R, Rudling M, Ljunggren H. G, et al. CD1d-dependent activation of NKT cells aggravates atherosclerosis. J Exp Med. 2004;199:417–422. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Terabe M, Berzofsky J. A. The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity. Adv Cancer Res. 2008;101:277–348. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)00408-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Masuya H, Nakai Y, Motegi H, Niinaya N, Kida Y, et al. Development and implementation of a database system to manage a large-scale mouse ENU-mutagenesis program. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:404–411. doi: 10.1007/s00335-004-2265-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yoshida Y, Makita Y, Heida N, Asano S, Matsushima A, et al. PosMed (Positional Medline): prioritizing genes with an artificial neural network comprising medical documents to accelerate positional cloning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W147–W152. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cui J, Shin T, Kawano T, Sato H, Kondo E, et al. Requirement for Vα14 NKT cells in IL-12-mediated rejection of tumors. Science. 1997;278:1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mendiratta S. K, Martin W. D, Hong S, Boesteanu A, Joyce S, Van Kaer L. CD1d1 mutant mice are deficient in natural T cells that promptly produce IL-4. Immunity. 1997;6:469–477. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80290-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Watarai H, Nakagawa R, Omori-Miyake M, Dashtsoodol N, Taniguchi M. Methods for detection, isolation and culture of mouse and human invariant NKT cells. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:70–78. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kawamoto H, Ikawa T, Ohmura K, Fujimoto S, Katsura Y. T cell progenitors emerge earlier than B cell progenitors in the murine fetal liver. Immunity. 2000;12:441–450. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80196-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kawamoto H, Ohmura K, Fujimoto S, Lu M, Ikawa T, Katsura Y. Extensive proliferation of T cell lineage-restricted progenitors in the thymus: an essential process for clonal expression of diverse T cell receptor β chains. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:606–615. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bolstad B. M, Collin F, Simpson K. M, Irizarry R. A, Speed T. P. Experimental design and low-level analysis of microarray data. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2004;60:25–58. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(04)60002-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schwarze J, Mäkelä M, Cieslewicz G, Dakhama A, Lahn M, et al. Transfer of the enhancing effect of respiratory syncytial virus infection on subsequent allergic airway sensitization by T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1999;163:5729–5734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schwarze J, Cieslewicz G, Joetham A, Ikemura T, Mäkelä M. J, et al. Critical roles for interleukin-4 and interleukin-5 during respiratory syncytial virus infection in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness after airway sensitization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:380–386. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9903057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Becnel D, You D, Erskin J, Dimina D. M, Cormier S. A. A role for airway remodeling during respiratory syncytial virus infection. Respir Res. 2005;6:122. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.