Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2012 Jan 1;2(1):79–82. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001321

Drosophila Reporter Vectors Compatible with ΦC31 Integrase Transgenesis Techniques and Their Use to Generate New Notch Reporter Fly Lines

Ben E Housden 1, Kat Millen 1, Sarah J Bray 1,1
Editor: B J Andrews
PMCID: PMC3276196  PMID: 22384384

Abstract

Complex spatial and temporal regulation of gene activity is fundamental to development and homeostasis. The ability to decipher the DNA sequences that accurately coordinate gene expression is, therefore, of primary importance. One way to assess the functions of DNA elements entails their fusion to fluorescent reporter genes. This powerful approach makes it possible to visualize their regulatory capabilities when reintroduced into the developing animal. Transgenic studies in Drosophila have recently advanced with the introduction of site-specific, ΦC31 integrase–mediated approaches. However, most existing Drosophila reporter vectors are not compatible with this new approach and have become obsolete. Here we describe a new series of fluorescent reporter vectors optimized for use with ΦC31 transgenesis. By using these vectors to generate a set of Notch reporter fly lines, we demonstrate their efficacy in reporting the function of gene regulatory elements.

Keywords: reporter plasmids, ΦC31 integrase, fluorescent protein, Drosophila, Notch


Understanding the mechanisms employed by regulatory DNA sequences to control gene expression is essential to the study of development and disease. Tools enabling this are, therefore, of major importance. One method for deciphering genomic regulatory information utilizes in vivo reporter assays to assess the activity of putative enhancers. For such analysis, the DNA is subcloned adjacent to easily monitored reporter genes, such as encoding β-galactosidase or green fluorescent protein (GFP), in vectors designed for transgenesis. This approach has been widely exploited in Drosophila, where stably inherited, single-copy transgene insertions could be generated with p-element transposon-based vectors (Rubin and Spradling 1982; Spradling and Rubin 1982). With this method, transgenes are inserted randomly in the genome, with a preference for promoter regions (Bellen et al. 2004). Expression from such insertions is often influenced by the surrounding sequences (position effects), leading to difficulties in interpreting patterns generated.

More recently, a transformation system has been introduced which exploits the integration mechanism used by bacteriophage ΦC31 (Groth et al. 2004). A phage integrase induces recombination between attP (phage genome) and attB (bacterial genome) sequences (Groth and Calos 2004; Thorpe and Smith 1998). Several groups have established transgenic fly lines containing attP sites (platforms) at specific, nonmutagenic locations (Bateman et al. 2006; Bischof et al. 2007; Groth et al. 2004; Markstein et al. 2008; Venken et al. 2006). Injection of attB-containing vectors with a source of ΦC31 integrase results in integration of the vector into the genome at the attP platform.

The ΦC31 system is more efficient than previous techniques, and as integration occurs at specific attP sites, insertions are directly comparable and mapping is unnecessary. However, most vectors for in vivo reporter assays, lacking attB sites, are incompatible with this method. Two adapted vectors with attB sequences have recently been made, but both use Gateway cloning and one retains p-element ends, precluding subsequent use of p-element mutagenesis in the flies generated (Aerts et al. 2010; Boy et al. 2010). We have generated a new series of compatible vectors that contain no unneccessary sequences and are optimized for enhancer detection due to the position of the cloning site, inclusion of insulators, and use of multiple reporters.

To achieve this, we adapted elements from the existing HZ50PL-lacZ enhancer–detecting vector (Hiromi and Gehring 1987) and a high copy p-element transformation plasmid [p-WhiteRabbit; Dunin-Borkowski and Brown (1995)]. We combined the hsp70 minimal promoter from HZ50PL-lacZ with eGFP, mCherry, lacZ, or venus[PEST]-YFP coding sequences. Incorporating these reporters into a plasmid containing the p-WhiteRabbit vector backbone, mini-white, and kanamycin resistance genes (kan) in combination with an attB sequence enables use of the ΦC31 system. A lox-p site was included to allow removal of kan and platform sequences after genomic integration.

To minimize influence from position effects, the mini-white gene and vector backbone are arranged to flank the reporter gene after integration (Figure 1). We also inserted insulator (gypsy) elements, which have been shown to be effective in reducing the influence of neighboring sequences, flanking mini-white and the reporter gene (Barolo et al. 2000; Barolo et al. 2004) (Figure 1, purple circles). Resulting vectors are named after the originating plasmid (pWhiteRabbit), substituting the color prefix according to the type of reporter (pGreenRabbit, etc.). These vectors are compatible with a wide range of experiments, including live imaging. For example, destabilized Venus[PEST]-YFP could be used when perdurance of the reporter would be an issue or when fine-scale temporal differences in expression are investigated (Aulehla et al. 2008; Nagai et al. 2002). Furthermore, the different reporters enable several regulatory elements to be analyzed simultaneously.

Figure 1 .

Figure 1 

Reporter vectors compatible with ΦC31 transgenesis techniques. Diagram of vector backbone (top) into which four different reporters have been inserted as indicated. All vectors carry kanamycin resistance and use mini-white as a transformation marker. All reporters are downstream of a minimal hsp70 promoter and are flanked by UTRs from the hsp70 gene. The positions of gypsy (SuHw) insulator sequences (purple), lox-p, attB (yellow), and multiple cloning site (MCS) unique restriction sites are indicated.

Reporters show no basal expression

One important criterion for reporter constructs is that basal expression levels should be low. We tested whether pGreenRabbit gave any expression in the absence of an enhancer by generating insertions in several attP platform lines (2A, 22A, 51D, 68E, 81C, and 96E). In no case was GFP expression detected in the wing disc (Figure 2A and data not shown). Similarly, no basal expression could be detected in larval brains or trachea, confirming their efficacy as enhancer-detection vectors (Figure 2, G and H).

Figure 2 .

Figure 2 

Vectors accurately report expression pattern from a Notch responsive element. (A) Basal expression from pGreenRabbit (GR) integrated at platform 51D. (B–E) Expression from indicated reporter vectors driven by the Notch responsive element (NRE) in the wing pouch of third instar larvae. NRE-lacZ (B, magenta; B′′, white) is a previously reported Notch reporter (Furriols and Bray 2001). The same NRE was used to generate NRE-GreenRabbit (NRE-GRins; B, green; B′, white); NRE-RedRabbit (NRE-RRins; C); NRE-BlueRabbit (NRE-BRins; D); and NRE-VenusRabbit (NRE-VRins; E). NRE-VRins was imaged with 10× excitation. (F) Notch-RNAi expression in the posterior compartment (green braces; driven using en-Gal4) eliminates expression from NRE-GRins. (G, H) Basal expression from pGR integrated at platform 51D in the larval brain (G) and trachea (H). (I, J) Expression from NRE-GRins in the larval brain (I) and trachea (J). Suffix “ins” indicates that the constructs contained insulators. (K) Comparison of expression levels from independent transgenic lines (average pixel intensity in the wing pouch measured using ImageJ). NRE-RR insertions at the same platform (86Fb) produce similar expression levels. NRE-lacZ insertions generated using p-element transgenesis are expressed at varying levels. At least five discs were quantified per genotype. Error bars show standard error of the mean. Primary antibodies were rabbit α-GFP (Molecular Probes, 1/500) (A, B, and E–J); rabbit α-dsRed (ClonTech, 1/50) (C); and mouse α-βGalactosidase (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1/20) (B and D).

Vectors accurately report Notch responsive enhancer activity

To test the functionality of these vectors, we inserted a previously characterized Notch responsive element (NRE) (Furriols and Bray 2001). Costaining to detect expression from NRE-GreenRabbit and the previous NRE-lacZ (Figure 2, B-B”) revealed identical patterns in wing discs. Furthermore, NRE-GreenRabbit gave the expected expression patterns elsewhere. In trachea, GFP was detected only in nests of cells at the tracheal branch points, as reported for the parent NRE reporter (Furriols and Bray 2001), and in larval brains, it was present in imaginal neuroblasts, a known site of Notch activity (Almeida and Bray 2005) (Figure 2, I and J). Notch responsiveness of NRE-GreenRabbit was confirmed by expressing Notch-RNAi in posterior compartments of wing discs. Under these conditions, expression was lost, indicating that it is dependent on Notch signaling (Figure 2F). NRE function was also accurately reported with mCherry, lacZ, and Venus[PEST]-YFP variants (Figure 2, C-E). As expected, independent insertions of NRE-RedRabbit at a single platform site gave reproducible expression levels compared with independent NRE-lacZ p-element insertions (Figure 2K). The new vectors, therefore, accurately and reproducibly report known expression patterns from enhancer elements. The lines generated will also provide useful tools for analysis of Notch pathway activity in vivo.

Transgenes are resistant to position effects

To test susceptibility to surrounding sequences, we analyzed expression from pGreenRabbit at a location prone to position effects from a neighboring gene (51D) (http://flyc31.frontiers-in-genetics.org/). No expression was detected in wing imaginal discs (Figure 3A) or in several other tissues (Figure 2, G and H), indicating that the flanking vector sequences are effective buffers. When these vectors were removed by inducing recombination between lox-p sites, patterned reporter expression was present but greatly attenuated in the presence of insulators (Figure 3, B-C). Therefore, both the buffering sequences and insulators are effective in preventing position effects and make the vectors resistant to influences from surrounding DNA. Furthermore, the insulator sequences have no adverse effects on vector function, (Figure 3, D and E).

Figure 3 .

Figure 3 

Insulators and buffering sequences are effective in preventing position effects without interfering with local enhancer-driven expression. Expression from pGreenRabbit in the absence of an enhancer sequence under the following conditions: buffering sequences present without insulators (GR; A); buffering sequences removed by Cre-induced recombination between lox-p sites without insulators (GR*; B); and buffering sequences removed with insulators (GRins*; C). Expression driven by the NRE enhancer in the absence (NRE-GR; D) or presence (NRE-Grins; E) of insulators. (A) and (C) were imaged using 4× higher excitation compared with other images. Primary antibody was rabbit α-GFP (Molecular Probes, 1/500) for all images.

In summary, we have constructed a series of four reporter vectors specifically designed for use with ΦC31-mediated transgenesis that enable analysis and direct comparisons of different enhancers. Insulator elements and buffering sequences have been incorporated to protect the reporter gene from position effects. Using these vectors, we have produced a new generation of Notch reporter flies. These fly-lines demonstrate that the transgenes are effective reporters of enhancer-driven expression and, therefore, that the vectors constitute a flexible set of tools for in vivo enhancer assays in Drosophila.

Literature Cited

  1. Aerts S., Quan X. J., Claeys A., Naval Sanchez M., Tate P., et al. , 2010.  Robust target gene discovery through transcriptome perturbations and genome-wide enhancer predictions in Drosophila uncovers a regulatory basis for sensory specification. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida M. S., Bray S. J., 2005.  Regulation of post-embryonic neuroblasts by Drosophila Grainyhead. Mech. Dev. 122: 1282–1293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aulehla A., Wiegraebe W., Baubet V., Wahl M. B., Deng C., et al. , 2008.  A beta-catenin gradient links the clock and wavefront systems in mouse embryo segmentation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10: 186–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barolo S., Carver L. A., Posakony J. W., 2000.  GFP and beta-galactosidase transformation vectors for promoter/enhancer analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques 29: 726, 728, 730, 732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barolo S., Castro B., Posakony J. W., 2004.  New Drosophila transgenic reporters: insulated P-element vectors expressing fast-maturing RFP. Biotechniques 36: 436–440, 442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bateman J. R., Lee A. M., Wu C. T., 2006.  Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics 173: 769–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bellen H. J., Levis R. W., Liao G., He Y., Carlson J. W., et al. , 2004.  The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167: 761–781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bischof J., Maeda R. K., Hediger M., Karch F., Basler K., 2007.  An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 3312–3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boy A. L., Zhai Z., Habring-Muller A., Kussler-Schneider Y., Kaspar P., et al. , 2010.  Vectors for efficient and high-throughput construction of fluorescent drosophila reporters using the PhiC31 site-specific integration system. Genesis 48: 452–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunin-Borkowski O. M., Brown N. H., 1995.  Mammalian CD2 is an effective heterologous marker of the cell surface in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 168: 689–693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furriols M., Bray S., 2001.  A model Notch response element detects Suppressor of Hairless-dependent molecular switch. Curr. Biol. 11: 60–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Groth A. C., Calos M. P., 2004.  Phage integrases: biology and applications. J. Mol. Biol. 335: 667–678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Groth A. C., Fish M., Nusse R., Calos M. P., 2004.  Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166: 1775–1782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hiromi Y., Gehring W. J., 1987.  Regulation and function of the Drosophila segmentation gene fushi tarazu. Cell 50: 963–974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Markstein M., Pitsouli C., Villalta C., Celniker S. E., Perrimon N., 2008.  Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat. Genet. 40: 476–483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nagai T., Ibata K., Park E. S., Kubota M., Mikoshiba K., et al. , 2002.  A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 87–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C., 1982.  Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218: 348–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spradling A. C., Rubin G. M., 1982.  Transposition of cloned P elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes. Science 218: 341–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thorpe H. M., Smith M. C., 1998.  In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5505–5510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Venken K. J., He Y., Hoskins R. A., Bellen H. J., 2006.  P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314: 1747–1751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES