Phosphorylation of Chromosome Core Components May Serve as Axis Marks for the Status of Chromosomal Events during Mammalian Meiosis

Tomoyuki Fukuda; Florencia Pratto; John C Schimenti; James M A Turner; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Christer Höög

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002485

. 2012 Feb 9;8(2):e1002485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002485

Phosphorylation of Chromosome Core Components May Serve as Axis Marks for the Status of Chromosomal Events during Mammalian Meiosis

Tomoyuki Fukuda ^1,^*, Florencia Pratto ², John C Schimenti ³, James M A Turner ⁴, R Daniel Camerini-Otero ², Christer Höög ^1,^*

Editor: Mary Ann Handel⁵

PMCID: PMC3276554 PMID: 22346761

Abstract

Meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis between homologous chromosomes are essential for proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division. While recombination and synapsis, as well as checkpoints that monitor these two events, take place in the context of a prophase I-specific axial chromosome structure, it remains unclear how chromosome axis components contribute to these processes. We show here that many protein components of the meiotic chromosome axis, including SYCP2, SYCP3, HORMAD1, HORMAD2, SMC3, STAG3, and REC8, become post-translationally modified by phosphorylation during the prophase I stage. We found that HORMAD1 and SMC3 are phosphorylated at a consensus site for the ATM/ATR checkpoint kinase and that the phosphorylated forms of HORMAD1 and SMC3 localize preferentially to unsynapsed chromosomal regions where synapsis has not yet occurred, but not to synapsed or desynapsed regions. We investigated the genetic requirements for the phosphorylation events and revealed that the phosphorylation levels of HORMAD1, HORMAD2, and SMC3 are dramatically reduced in the absence of initiation of meiotic recombination, whereas BRCA1 and SYCP3 are required for normal levels of phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, but not of SMC3. Interestingly, reduced HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 phosphorylation is associated with impaired targeting of the MSUC (meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin) machinery to unsynapsed chromosomes, suggesting that these post-translational events contribute to the regulation of the synapsis surveillance system. We propose that modifications of chromosome axis components serve as signals that facilitate chromosomal events including recombination, checkpoint control, transcription, and synapsis regulation.

Author Summary

Meiosis is a specialized cell division to generate haploid sperm and eggs. For accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the first meiotic division, chromosome synapsis and recombination should be properly established between them during the prophase I stage. Chromosome synapsis and recombination proceed in the context of the meiotic chromosome axis. While studies using knockout mouse models have revealed that chromosome axis components play roles in multiple chromosomal events during mammalian meiosis, it remains to be elucidated how they contribute to the processes. Here, we show that many mammalian meiotic chromosome axis proteins are phosphorylated in a spatially and temporally distinct manner during the prophase I stage. Especially, phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and SMC3 was observed preferentially in chromosomal regions where synapsis has not occurred. Moreover, phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 was reduced in mutant testicular cells that were defective in recombination initiation or chromosome axis organization. Additionally, the mutant spermatocytes failed to correctly distribute checkpoint proteins that coordinate chromosome synapsis with gene expression and meiotic progression. Thus, it is suggested that phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins serves as integrative axis marks for the status of events that take place on meiotic chromosomes.

Introduction

Meiosis is a special type of cell division that gives rise to haploid gametes required for sexual reproduction. To halve the chromosome number, two successive chromosome segregation events follow a single round of DNA replication. At the first stage of meiosis, the leptotene stage of prophase I, recombination is initiated between homologous chromosomes (homologs) by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) formed by the SPO11 protein [1]. Recombination is, in some organisms including mice, required for synapsis of homologs [2], [3]. At the zygotene stage of prophase I, homologs come into close proximity and the synaptonemal complex (SC) assembles between the aligned homologs [4], [5]. At the pachytene stage of prophase I, the homologs become fully synapsed by the SCs and repair of a subset of DSBs results in crossover recombination. At the diplotene stage of prophase I, the SCs are disassembled and the homologs undergo desynapsis, now attached to each other only at crossover sites. The physical connections between the homologs, called chiasmata, are essential for correct segregation of the homologs at the anaphase stage of meiosis I [6]. Thus, processes that transform the nature of meiotic chromosomes, such as recombination and synapsis, are executed in a coordinated manner during prophase I.

The integrity of the recombination process and chromosome synapsis during prophase I is monitored by cellular surveillance systems [7]. Checkpoint kinases such as ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) play key roles in the meiotic surveillance systems in many organisms, including mice. In budding yeast, Mec1 and Tel1, the yeast orthologs of ATR and ATM, respectively, are activated by Spo11-generated DSBs to regulate the pachytene checkpoint that monitors recombination and synapsis [7]. In mammals, deficiencies in recombination or synapsis give rise to meiotic arrest or cell death at the late zygotene or pachytene stage of prophase I [8]–[11]. This checkpoint-like phenomenon is thought to be controlled by MSUC (meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin), a surveillance system that monitors synapsis and causes gene silencing [10]. In MSUC, ATR is recruited to unsynapsed chromosomal regions together with ATR activators, such as BRCA1 and TOPBP1, and induces phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) in those regions [10]. This post-translational signal triggers chromatin alterations, leading to transcriptional silencing [10], [12]. The MSUC machinery is proposed to control meiotic progression, by silencing gene expression on the XY chromosomes in male germ cells and by a yet-to-be-determined mechanism in female germ cells [10], [13]–[16]. In contrast to ATR, ATM is dispensable for meiotic surveillance systems including MSUC in mouse meiosis, while it is required for completion and regulation of meiotic recombination [8], [9], [17].

Meiotic recombination and synapsis take place in the context of a prophase I-specific chromosome structure. Chromosomes consisting of two sister chromatids are organized in linear arrays of chromatin loops whose bases are attached to the chromosome axis [4]. The chromosome axis is associated to a single axial chromosome core composed of cohesin complex proteins and cohesin regulators, which promote sister chromatid cohesion and include meiosis-specific cohesin subunits, such as REC8, RAD21L, SMC1β and STAG3, as well as the canonical cohesin subunits (SMC3, SA1/2, SMC1α and RAD21) and cohesin-associated proteins (WAPL and PDS5B) [18]–[23]. The cohesin core serves as a scaffold for the assembly of the axial element (AE) of the SC, a protein structure that promotes additional chromosome axis organization. SYCP2 and SYCP3 are major components of the mammalian AE and are essential for its formation [24], [25]. Proteins harboring a HORMA (Hop1, Rev7 and Mad2) domain represent a third group of chromosome axis proteins in eukaryotes and include the mammalian HORMA domain-containing proteins, HORMAD1 and HORMAD2. In contrast to cohesin complex proteins and AE proteins, HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 bind preferentially to chromosome axes where homologs are not synapsed, such as axes prior to synapsis (unsynapsed) and axes where the SC has disassembled after completion of synapsis (desynapsed) [26], [27]. We have monitored here the phosphorylation status of individual chromosome axis proteins in mouse spermatocytes during prophase I, to better understand the relationship between axis morphogenesis and axis-associated chromosomal events. We report that chromosome axis proteins, such as cohesin complex proteins, AE proteins and HORMA domain-containing proteins, are phosphorylated in a spatially and temporally distinct manner during mammalian meiosis. We suggest that the observed dynamic changes in the phosphorylation pattern of chromosome axis proteins serve as signals that integrate the recruitment of regulatory proteins with the facilitation of chromosomal events that take place on meiotic chromosomes.

Results

Chromosome axis proteins are differentially phosphorylated during the prophase I stage of meiosis

To examine the phosphorylation status of meiotic chromosome axis components, we performed immunoblotting experiments following SDS-gel separation of mouse testis nuclear extracts. The nuclear extracts were also treated with phosphatase to identify phosphorylated proteins by changes in their gel mobility (Figure 1A and Figure S1). Phosphatase-sensitive protein bands were detected for SYCP2, SYCP3, STAG3, REC8, HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 (Figure 1A, black and gray arrowheads), whereas no obvious mobility shifts were seen for SMC3 and SMC1β (Figure 1A). Thus, most of the chromosome axis proteins that we analyzed are phosphorylated. To examine whether the phosphorylated forms of these proteins are bound to chromosomes, we fractionated testis nuclear extracts. Testis nuclear extracts were treated with detergents containing Triton X-100, and then fractionated by centrifugation into a pellet (insoluble fraction) including chromosome-associated proteins and a supernatant (soluble fraction) containing nucleoplasmic proteins. SYCP2 was found to be highly enriched in the insoluble fraction, whereas the other chromosome axis proteins were found in both fractions (Figure 1B). We found that the phosphorylated forms of HORMAD1, HORMAD2, STAG3 and REC8 were preferentially bound to the chromosome, by comparing the gel mobility of the protein bands in the insoluble fraction to those in the nuclear extracts. In contrast, the phosphorylated forms of SYCP3 appeared at similar levels in both fractions. Thus, chromosome axis proteins bound to chromosomes are frequently phosphorylated.

(A) Testis nuclear extracts treated with (+) or without (−) phosphatase (PPase) and phosphatase inhibitors (Inhibitor) were probed with antibodies against meiotic chromosome axis components. Phosphatase-sensitive slow-migrating forms are indicated by black and gray arrowheads. (B) Testis nuclear extracts were fractionated into detergent-soluble and detergent-insoluble fractions and analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies against meiotic chromosome axis components. Histone H3 was used as a control for chromosomal proteins. (C) Testis nuclear extracts from juvenile mice of each age were examined by immunoblotting. (D) Testis nuclear extracts were immunoprecipitated without (Mock) or with the antibody against the phosphorylated S/T-Q motif (pS/T-Q). The immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed on a gradient gel and examined by immunoblotting against chromosome axis proteins. Note that using a gradient gel did not enable separation of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of chromosome axis proteins.

We next analyzed the timing with which phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins takes place. We used testis nuclear extracts of juvenile mice, in which a synchronous first wave of spermatogenesis occurs. As shown in Figure 1C, the phosphorylated forms of SYCP2, STAG3, REC8 and HORMAD1 were detected as early as 11 or 12 days postpartum (dpp), corresponding to the leptotene and early zygotene stages of prophase I. For HORMAD2, a phosphorylated form of this protein was first seen at 12 dpp (Figure 1C, gray arrowhead). In addition, a second phosphorylated form appeared at 17 dpp, corresponding to the late pachytene stage (Figure 1C, black arrowhead), suggesting that phosphorylation of HORMAD2 occurs in a temporally-regulated manner.

To gain insights into the nature of the kinases responsible for the observed phosphorylation events targeting chromosome axis proteins, we used an anti-pS/T-Q antibody that recognizes a phosphorylated serine or threonine followed by a glutamine residue, a consensus target sequence for ATM /ATR (S/T-Q motif). Testis nuclear extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with the anti-pS/T-Q antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed for chromosome axis proteins by immunoblotting. We detected strong protein bands representing SYCP2, HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 in the immunoprecipitates, suggesting that phosphorylation of these proteins occurs at an S/T-Q motif (Figure 1D). We also detected a relatively strong signal for SMC3 in the immunoprecipitates (Figure 1D), implying that this chromosome axis protein is also phosphorylated at an S/T-Q motif despite the absence of a detectable shift in gel mobility (Figure 1A). We saw little or no signal in the anti-pS/T-Q immunoprecipitates for STAG3, SMC1β, REC8 and SYCP3 (Figure 1D), suggesting that these proteins are phosphorylated at other motifs than the S/T-Q motif. Altogether, our results suggest that multiple kinases with different motif-specificity contribute to phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins.

The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 is restricted to unsynapsed chromosomal axes

We next investigated the phosphorylation events that target HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 in more detail. Immunoprecipitates of the anti-pS/T-Q antibody were examined using gel conditions that provided better resolution than that seen in Figure 1D, identifying one band strongly labeled by the anti-HORMAD1 antibody (Figure 2A, black arrowhead) and two bands labeled by the anti-HORMAD2 antibody (Figure 2A, black and gray arrowheads). The enrichment of the slowest-migrating phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 (Figure 2A, black arrowhead) suggests that two phosphorylated forms of HORMAD1 exist, one that is phosphorylated primarily at a non-S/T-Q site and one that is phosphorylated at multiple sites containing an S/T-Q site. In contrast, the observation that both phosphorylated forms of HORMAD2 were enriched in the anti-pS/T-Q immunoprecipitates (Figure 2A, black and gray arrowheads) suggests that the both forms of HORMAD2 are phosphorylated at an S/T-Q site(s).

Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 contain several S/T-Q motifs, including the Ser³⁷⁵-Gln³⁷⁶ motif in the C-terminal region of HORMAD1 that is highly conserved in vertebrate HORMAD1 proteins (data not shown). Based on this information, we generated a peptide antibody against the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 (anti-pS375). Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting experiments using the anti-pS375 antibody showed that HORMAD1 is phosphorylated at Ser³⁷⁵ in testis nuclear extracts (Figure 2B and 2C).

To examine the chromosomal localization of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1, nuclear spreads of mouse testicular cells were immunostained using the anti-pS375 antibody. The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 was first detectable as series of small foci along the chromosome axes in leptotene spermatocytes, temporally coinciding with loading of HORMAD1 onto the entire chromosome axis, as labeled by the regular anti-HORMAD1 antibody (Figure 2D). The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 appeared as discontinuous lines composed of small foci on HORMAD1-labelled unsynapsed chromosome axes during zygotene (Figure 2D and 2E). In pachytene and diplotene spermatocytes, the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 overlapped with HORMAD1 at unsynapsed chromosome axes of the XY chromosomes (Figure 2D). Strikingly, whereas the anti-HORMAD1 antibody also labeled desynapsed chromosomal regions that appear at the diplotene stage [26], [27], the anti-pS375 antibody did not (Figure 2D). To confirm this staining pattern, we examined the localization of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 in oocytes during prophase I. We observed that the anti-pS375 antibody labeled series of foci along unsynapsed chromosomal regions in these cells, but notably did not label synapsed or desynapsed regions of chromosomes (Figure S2A).

Depletion of HORMAD1 from the synapsed chromosome axes requires the TRIP13 AAA-ATPase [27]. We therefore examined the chromosomal distribution of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 in a Trip13 mutant. We observed that the anti-pS375 antibody, in contrast to the situation in wild-type spermatocytes, also labeled discontinuous lines along the chromosome axes of synapsed autosomes in the mutant spermatocytes (89/100 pachytene cells) (Figure 2F). Taken together, our data show that HORMAD1 is phosphorylated at Ser³⁷⁵, that the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 is restricted to unsynapsed chromosomes in wild-type meiocytes and that TRIP13 facilitates the depletion of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 from synapsed chromosomes.

The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is preferentially associated with unsynapsed chromosomal regions

We detected SMC3 in the anti-pS/T-Q immunoprecipitates of testis nuclear extracts (Figure 1D). SMC3 is known to be phosphorylated in mammalian cells at an S/T-Q motif, the Ser¹⁰⁸³-Gln¹⁰⁸⁴ motif, in response to DNA damage [28]. Indeed, immunoprecipitation of SMC3 from testis nuclear extracts followed by immunoblotting using a selective antibody for the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (anti-pS1083) identified a protein band in a phosphatase-sensitive manner (Figure 3A). Since SMC3 is expressed in both mitotic and meiotic cells, we addressed whether phosphorylation of SMC3 at Ser¹⁰⁸³ occurs in the context of the meiotic chromosome axis. Indeed, we found several meiosis-specific cohesin components and AE proteins to be co-immunoprecipitated from testis nuclear extracts with the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (Figure 3B). In addition, the anti-pS1083 signal increased when the first wave of spermatogenesis reached the leptotene stage (Figure S3A). Next, nuclear spreads of mouse spermatocytes and oocytes were immunostained using the anti-pS1083 antibody (Figure 3C, Figures S3B and S2B). The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was first detectable as foci on chromosome axes in leptotene cells (Figure 3C, Figures S3B and S2B). The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was present on both synapsed and unsynapsed chromosomal regions at early zygotene (Figure 3C), whereas the signal intensity increased preferentially at unsynapsed chromosomal regions during late zygotene (Figure 3C, Figures S3B and S2B). In pachytene and diplotene spermatocytes, the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 accumulated on the XY chromosomes (Figure 3C and Figure S3B). Thus, the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is preferentially associated with unsynapsed chromosomes.

(A) Testis nuclear extracts were immunoprecipitated with the anti-SMC3 antibody, followed by treatment with (+) or without (−) phosphatase (PPase) and phosphatase inhibitors (Inhibitor). 80% of the immunoprecipitated SMC3 and the rest were separated on a gradient gel and immunoblotted with antibodies against the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (pS1083) and normal SMC3, respectively. (B) Testis nuclear extracts were immunoprecipitated without (Mock) or with the anti-pS1083 antibody. The immunoprecipitates were probed with antibodies against meiotic chromosome axis components. The asterisk marks a non-specific band. (C) Nuclear spreads of spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS1083, anti-SYCP3 and anti-HORMAD1 antibodies. Arrowheads indicate the XY bivalent. Bars, 10 µm.

Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 partially depends on BRCA1 but not on ATM

We have identified a set of phosphorylation events that target HORMAD1 and SMC3 localized at unsynapsed chromosomal regions and shown that they are phosphorylated at an S/T-Q motif, a known motif for ATM/ATR kinases. We therefore investigated the role of these kinases in phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins. Nuclear extracts were prepared from the testes of Atm ^−/− mice and the occurrence of the phosphorylated forms of chromosome axis proteins in the insoluble fraction was analyzed. We found that SYCP2, STAG3, REC8 and HORMAD1 are phosphorylated in the Atm ^−/− testis nuclear extracts (Figure 4A). We also detected the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 and the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 in the Atm ^−/− testis extracts (Figure 4B and 4C), as well as in the Atm ^−/− spermatocytes (Figure S4). We observed a reduced intensity of the slowest-migrating form of HORMAD2 (Figure 4A, black arrowhead). However, since this phosphorylated form of HORMAD2 occurs at the late pachytene stage (Figure 1C), the reduced intensity of this band in the Atm ^−/− testis extracts is most likely due to the observed loss of germ cells that takes place at the pachytene stage in Atm ^−/− male mice [8], [29]. Therefore, we conclude that ATM is dispensable for phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins prior to the pachytene stage.

(A and D) The insoluble fraction of testis nuclear extracts was prepared from *Atm* ^−/− (A) and *Brca1* ^Δ11/Δ11 *Trp53* ^+/− (*Brca1^Δ*) (D) males and probed with antibodies against meiotic chromosome axis components. (B and E) Testis nuclear extracts from *Atm* ^−/− (B) and *Brca1* ^Δ11/Δ11 *Trp53* ^+/− (E) males were immunoprecipitated with the anti-HORMAD1 antibody. 80% of the immunoprecipitated HORMAD1 and the rest were separated on a gradient gel and immunoblotted with anti-pS375 and anti-HORMAD1 antibodies, respectively. The asterisk marks a non-specific band. (C and F) Testis nuclear extracts from *Atm* ^−/− (C) and *Brca1* ^Δ11/Δ11 *Trp53* ^+/− (F) males were immunoprecipitated with the anti-SMC3 antibody. 80% of the immunoprecipitated SMC3 and the rest were separated on a gradient gel and immunoblotted with anti-pS1083 and anti-SMC3 antibodies, respectively. (G) Nuclear spreads of *Brca1* ^Δ11/Δ11 *Trp53* ^+/− pachytene spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375, anti-SYCP3 and anti-SYCP1 antibodies. Arrowheads indicate the XY bivalent. Bar, 10 µm.

ATR is localized to unsynapsed chromosomal axes [10]. We found that the distribution of ATR is similar to that of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 from late zygotene to diplotene (Figure S5). To examine if ATR phosphorylates chromosome axis proteins during prophase I, we took advantage of the fact that BRCA1 is required for a subset of ATM/ATR-dependent phosphorylation events [30] and that BRCA1 facilitates the proper distribution of ATR at unsynapsed chromosomal regions during prophase I in meiocytes [13], [31]. We prepared nuclear extracts from testes of Brca1 ^Δ11/Δ11 Trp53 ^+/− males, which express a mutated BRCA1 protein that lacks a protein domain encoded by exon 11. The mutated BRCA1 protein fails to correctly distribute recombination proteins to repair sites and ATR to unsynapsed chromosomal regions in spermatocytes [13], [31], [32]. Immunoblotting experiments of the insoluble fraction prepared from the mutant testis nuclear extracts identified the phosphorylated forms of SYCP2, STAG3 and REC8, as well as the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (Figure 4D and 4F). In contrast, the intensities of the bands representing the slowest-migrating form of HORMAD1 (Figure 4D, black arrowhead), the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 (Figure 4E) and the two slow-migrating forms of HORMAD2 (Figure 4D, black and gray arrowheads) were partially decreased in this mutant. By immunostaining of the mutant pachytene spermatocytes, the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 was detected as discontinuous lines on unsynapsed axes of the XY chromosomes (50/50 pachytene cells) (Figure 4G). These findings suggest that the bulk of HORMAD1 phosphorylation is independent of ATR recruited to unsynapsed axes by the MSUC pathway and that BRCA1-regulated ATR may be required for efficient activation or maintenance of phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 at the unsynapsed chromosome axis.

SPO11 is required for normal levels of phosphorylation of HORMAD1, HORMAD2, and SMC3

To explore the relationship between phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins and meiotic recombination, we examined the phosphorylation status of chromosome axis proteins in Spo11 ^−/− testicular cells. SPO11-induced DSBs are required for the initiation of meiotic recombination. The phosphorylated forms of SYCP2, STAG3 and REC8 were detected in the insoluble fraction of testis nuclear extracts prepared from Spo11 ^−/− mice, showing that Spo11 is dispensable for phosphorylation of these proteins (Figure 5A). In contrast, the slowest-migrating form of HORMAD1 (Figure 5A, black arrowhead) and the two slow-migrating forms of HORMAD2 (Figure 5A, black and gray arrowheads) were not observed in the Spo11 ^−/− mutant. Furthermore, a considerably reduced signal was seen for the anti-pS375 antibody for HORMAD1 (Figure 5B) and the anti-pS1083 antibody for SMC3 (Figure 5C) in Spo11 ^−/− mutant testes. We also analyzed the phosphorylation status of HORMAD1 and SMC3 by immunostaining Spo11 ^−/− spermatocytes. Most of the chromosomes in Spo11 ^−/− spermatocytes remain unsynapsed due to lack of recombination, as visualized by intense HORMAD1 labeling on unsynapsed axes in these cells (Figure 5D and 5E). Importantly, the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 and the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 were hardly detected on the axis of unsynapsed chromosomal regions (Figure 5D and 5E). Thus, SPO11 is critically important for phosphorylation of HORMAD1 at Ser³⁷⁵, SMC3 at Ser¹⁰⁸³ and HORMAD2.

(A) The insoluble fraction of testis nuclear extracts was probed with antibodies against meiotic chromosome axis components. (B) The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 was examined as in Figure 4B. (C) The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was examined as in Figure 4C. (D) Nuclear spreads of *Spo11* ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375, anti-SYCP3 and anti-HORMAD1 antibodies. (E) Nuclear spreads of *Spo11* ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS1083, anti-SYCP3 and anti-HORMAD1 antibodies. Bars, 10 µm.

Efficient phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 requires SYCP3

To address the relationship between the phosphorylation of axis proteins and chromosome axis organization, we examined the phosphorylation status of chromosome axis proteins in three SC-deficient mutants, Sycp1 ^−/−, Tex12 ^−/− and Sycp3 ^−/−, as well as in a mutant deficient for a cohesin complex protein, Smc1β ^−/−. SYCP1 and TEX12 are components of the central region of the SC, a structure that is essential for chromosome synapsis [33], [34], whereas SMC1β is a meiosis-specific cohesin subunit that contributes to chromosome organization and synapsis [35]. As shown in Figure 6A, the phosphorylated forms of SYCP2, STAG3, REC8 and HORMAD1 were detected in the insoluble fraction of Sycp1 ^−/−, Tex12 ^−/− and Smc1β ^−/− testis nuclear extracts. The intensity of the slowest-migrating band of REC8 was increased in the Sycp1 ^−/− and Tex12 ^−/− mutants (Figure 6A, black arrowhead). We also detected the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 in Sycp1 ^−/−, Tex12 ^−/− and Smc1β ^−/− spermatocytes (Figure S6). The slowest-migrating form of HORMAD2 that appears at the late pachytene stage was not detected in these three mutants (Figure 6A, black arrowhead), most likely explained by the fact that spermatogenesis arrests at late zygotene or early pachytene in these three mutants [33]–[35]. Taken together, SYCP1, TEX12 and SMC1β are dispensable for phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins prior to the pachytene stage.

In the Sycp3 mutant, which does not form AEs and displays synapsis defects [24], [36], the immunoblotting signal of SYCP2 could not be detected in the insoluble fraction of testis nuclear extracts (Figure 6A), consistent with the fact that SYCP2 is not loaded onto the chromosome axis in this mutant [37]. Importantly, the slowest-migrating form of HORMAD1 (Figure 6A, black arrowhead) and the two slow-migrating forms of HORMAD2 (Figure 6A, black and gray arrowheads) were reduced in the absence of SYCP3. We confirmed the reduced level of HORMAD1 phosphorylation in the Sycp3 mutant by immunoblotting (Figure 6B) and immunostaining (Figure 6D and Figure S7A) using the anti-pS375 antibody. In contrast, the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was detectable in the Sycp3 mutant in both assays (Figure 6C, 6E and Figure S7C). These results show that SYCP3 is required for efficient phosphorylation of HORMAD1 at Ser³⁷⁵ and HORMAD2.

Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes are defective in distributing ATR to unsynapsed chromosomal regions

It was recently reported that HORMAD1 is required for loading the MSUC machinery, including ATR and γH2AX, onto the chromosome [16], [38]. To find out if phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 has a role in chromosome targeting of the MSUC machinery, we analyzed the distribution of γH2AX and ATR in Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes, in which phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 is impaired (Figure 6). In wild-type spermatocytes, SPO11-formed DSBs at the leptotene stage trigger a first wave of γH2AX mediated by ATM, a γH2AX signal that starts to fade away at the early zygotene stage [8], [17]. Subsequently, a second wave of γH2AX emerges during the zygotene stage, phosphorylation of H2AX now mediated by ATR as part of the MSUC pathway that targets unsynapsed chromosomes [17]. Thus, unsynapsed chromosomal regions in wild-type spermatocytes, whose axes are marked by HORMAD1, are labeled with γH2AX during the zygotene stage (Figure 7A and 7D) and also the unsynapsed AEs of the XY chromosomes at the pachytene and diplotene stages (data not shown) [39]. Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes are eliminated at a late zygotene stage or an early pachytene stage, and as consequence of this, many chromosomes in the mutant cells remain partially unsynapsed [24], [40]. In Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes, the first wave of γH2AX at the leptotene stage took place as seen in wild-type spermatocytes, and the γH2AX signal began to disappear at the early zygotene stage (Figure 7B, top panels). Importantly, in Sycp3 ^−/− cells at a late stage of zygotene, γH2AX failed to become localized to the unsynapsed chromosomes as seen in wild-type zygotene cells. Instead, the γH2AX signal in the mutant cells was localized to restricted domains (Figure 7B, middle panels) or displayed a pseudo-sex-body-like staining pattern (Figure 7B, bottom panels). The pseudo-sex body is a chromosomal domain seen in Spo11 ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes (Figure 7C), within which the MSUC machinery accumulates [14], [17], [39]. As seen in Spo11 ^−/− spermatocytes [14], ATR accumulated in the pseudo-sex-body-like domain in Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes (Figure 7E). These results show that ATR and γH2AX fail to correctly accumulate at unsynapsed chromosomal regions in Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes, as well as in Spo11 ^−/− spermatocytes.

(A–C) Nuclear spreads of wild-type (A), *Sycp3* ^−/− (B) and *Spo11* ^−/− (C) zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-γH2AX, anti-HORMAD1 and anti-SYCP1 antibodies. (D–G) Nuclear spreads of wild-type (D), *Sycp3* ^−/− (E), *Sycp1* ^−/− (F) and *Tex12* ^−/− (G) zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-γH2AX, anti-REC8 and anti-ATR antibodies. Arrowheads indicate the position of the pseudo-sex body-like staining of γH2AX. Bars, 10 µm.

To exclude the possibility that mislocalization of γH2AX and ATR in the Sycp3 ^−/− and Spo11 ^−/− mutants is due to a synapsis defect in these mutants, we also examined the distribution of these markers in Sycp1 ^−/− and Tex12 ^−/− spermatocytes. In these mutant spermatocytes, where meiosis does not proceed beyond the pachytene stage, γH2AX and ATR were observed on the entire length of unsynapsed chromosomes (Figure 7F and 7G) and did not display a pseudo-sex-body-like staining pattern. These results show that the distribution of the MSUC machinery and phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 are normal despite absence of synapsis. Our results reveal that SYCP3 and SPO11 contribute both to phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 and to the process through which ATR becomes correctly distributed to unsynapsed chromosomes. Possibly, it is the phosphorylated forms of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 that mediate the distribution of the MSUC machinery among unsynapsed chromosomes.

Discussion

Meiotic chromosome axis proteins are phosphorylated

We show here that a large number of chromosome axis proteins are phosphorylated during the prophase I stage of mouse meiosis. This includes HORMA domain-containing proteins (HORMAD1 and HORMAD2) and components of the cohesin complex (SMC3, STAG3 and REC8) and the AE (SYCP2 and SYCP3), similar to what has been shown previously for some individual mammalian chromosome axis proteins [26], . Chromosome axis proteins are intimately involved in several critical meiotic processes including sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome organization, recombination, synapsis and checkpoint control [16], [24], [35], [38], [45]–[47]. What is the role of the post-translational modifications added to the chromosome axis proteins? They could promote dissociation of proteins from the chromosome axis, in analogy with the displacement of the cohesin complex that occurs in response to phosphorylation at the prophase stage of mitosis [48]. We consider this explanation unlikely however, as phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins during meiosis starts at an early stage of prophase I, not coinciding with their displacement from the chromosome axis. Phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins could act more directly to promote different meiotic processes. Supporting this, phosphorylation of the yeast HORMA-domain containing protein, Hop1 in S. cerevisiae, is required for the prevention of inter-sister recombination and the pachytene checkpoint [49], while elimination of phosphorylation sites within Rec8 in S. cerevisiae causes defects in recombination and synapsis during prophase I [50]. To gain more insight into the functional consequences of the phosphorylation of various chromosome axis proteins during meiosis, we have focused on the role of the phosphorylation events that target SMC3, HORMAD1 and HORMAD2.

Phosphorylation of SMC3 occurs at unsynapsed chromosomal regions and depends on recombination

In mouse spermatocytes, SMC3 localizes to the meiotic chromosome axis irrespective of the status of chromosome synapsis (Figure S3B) [51]. We found that the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is preferentially associated with unsynapsed chromosomal regions but not with synapsed or desynapsed regions from late zygotene to diplotene, similar to the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1. Phosphorylation of SMC3 at Ser¹⁰⁸³ depends on SPO11 but is not affected in the absence of full-length BRCA1 and SYCP3, indicating that SMC3 is regulated differently from HORMAD1 and HORMAD2. Moreover, the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was detected on both synapsed and desynapsed chromosomes during early zygotene, in contrast to the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1, which is not detected in synapsed regions. Probably, TRIP13-mediated displacement of HORMAD1 from synapsed chromosome axes enables more strictly regulated localization of HORMAD1 phosphorylation in unsynapsed chromosomal regions.

The cohesin complex is one of the important factors in DNA damage response pathways [52]. SMC1α and SMC3 are phosphorylated at S/T-Q motifs by ATM/ATR and these phosphorylation events are crucial for the DNA damage checkpoint at the intra-S phase of mitosis [28]. As in mitotic cells, SMC3 may be phosphorylated primarily in response to DSBs that are introduced by SPO11 (Figure 8A, arrow 4). Since DSBs are processed and repaired by recombination on the chromosome axis, SMC3 phosphorylation may reflect the progression of this process and be involved in DNA damage repair or checkpoints as in mitotic cells. The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is also detected at the diplotene stage on the XY chromosomes where DSBs are repaired. This phosphorylation suggests that SMC3 is additionally phosphorylated at unsynapsed regions by ATR in a manner similar to H2AX in the MSUC pathway (Figure 8A, arrow 8). To summarize, SMC3 may change the modification status according to the progression of recombination and synapsis.

(A) Schematic representation of the model for regulation of phosphorylation of meiotic chromosomal proteins at S/T-Q motifs. In response to SPO11-formed DSBs (arrow 1), ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX (arrow 2) and ATR phosphorylates HORMAD1/2 (arrow 3) and SMC3 (arrow 4). Phosphorylated HORMAD1/2 serves as a marker for unsynapsis and contributes to the correct localization of ATR at unsynapsed chromosomal regions (arrow 5). At the unsynapsed chromosomes, ATR phosphorylates H2AX to promote MSUC (arrow 6), as well as HORMAD1/2 (arrow 7) and SMC3 (arrow 8). Phosphorylated HORMAD1/2 further stabilizes ATR (arrow 9) at unsynapsed chromosomes and ATR further phosphorylates HORMAD1/2 (arrow 10), amplifying the unsynapsis signal via the positive feedback loop (arrow 9 and 10). (B) The status of chromosome synapsis can be indicated by the presence or absence of HORMAD1/2 and phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and SMC3. At unsynapsed chromosomal regions, the chromosome axis contains the S/T-Q motif-phosphorylated forms of HORMAD1/2 and SMC3. When homologs are synapsed, HORMAD1/2 and the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 are displaced from the chromosome axis. After desynapsis, HORMAD1/2 is again included in the chromosome axis but HORMAD1 (and possibly HORMAD2) is not phosphorylated at the S/T-Q motif. Distribution of the phosphorylated forms of other components of the chromosome axis remains to be determined.

Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 may be part of a surveillance system monitoring synapsis

HORMAD1 has multiple phosphorylation sites, including Ser³⁷⁵ and a non-S/T-Q site, which are differently regulated. HORMAD1 is associated with unsynapsed and desynapsed chromosome axes [26], [27], but the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 is restricted to unsynapsed chromosomes. Collectively, our results show that HORMAD1 is phosphorylated at a non-S/T-Q site in the nucleoplasm, as well as on the chromosome, and that HORMAD1 is further phosphorylated at Ser³⁷⁵ on unsynapsed chromosomes in a SPO11-dependent manner.

HORMAD2 also has multiple phosphorylation sites. One phosphorylated form of HORMAD2 contains phosphorylation possibly at an S/T-Q site, which is regulated in a manner temporally and genetically similar to phosphorylation of HORMAD1 at Ser³⁷⁵. The other phosphorylated form of HORMAD2 is temporally regulated to take place at the late pachytene stage. Considering the localization of HORMAD2 at the unsynapsed chromosome axis during the leptotene to pachytene stages [27], we infer that HORMAD2 is primarily phosphorylated on unsynapsed chromosomes probably at an S/T-Q site similarly to Ser³⁷⁵ of HORMAD1 and that additional phosphorylation might occur on the XY chromosomes at the late pachytene stage.

ATR is recruited to unsynapsed chromosomal regions, to which HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 are localized, and phosphorylates histone H2AX, leading to MSUC [10]. Recent studies using Hormad1-deficient mice revealed that HORMAD1 has multiple functions, one of which is to load ATR onto the chromosome [16], [38]. We found here that phosphorylation of HORMAD1 at Ser³⁷⁵ and that of HORMAD2 are reduced in Spo11 ^−/−, Brca1 ^Δ11/Δ11 and Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes. Intriguingly, the three mutants exhibit a similar defect in which ATR and γH2AX fail to localize to unsynapsed chromosomal regions and instead assemble at aberrant nuclear sites (Figure 7) [31]. This phenotypic similarity leads us to propose a model in which phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 is required for the distribution of ATR at unsynapsed chromosomal regions (Figure 8A). HORMAD1 is primarily required for the loading of ATR irrespective of its phosphorylation state, because pseudo-sex body is formed in the Spo11 mutant in a HORMAD1-dependent manner [16]. Therefore, HORMAD1/2 phosphorylation is dispensable for the loading of ATR, but may regulate its distribution on the prophase I chromosome. It is possible that ATR tends to aggregate at certain domains on chromosomes, as seen in the pseudo-sex body formation. Phosphorylation of HORMAD1/2 may increase the affinity of HORMAD1/2 for ATR or ATR activators, leading to the anchoring of the ATR activity at entire unsynapsed chromosomes, against this tendency. This model explains why γH2AX is localized to the unsynapsed XY chromosomes but not to the desynapsed autosomes at the diplotene stage [39], despite the presence of HORMAD1/2 at both unsynapsed and desynapsed chromosomes. Phosphorylation-based regulation of checkpoint proteins is also known for other HORMA domain-containing proteins, such as yeast Hop1 in the pachytene checkpoint [49] and mammalian MAD2 in the spindle checkpoint [53]. Thus, phosphorylation of HORMAD1/2 may regulate phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions to recruit or anchor proteins involved in synapsis surveillance processes to unsynapsed chromosomes. HORMAD1/2 phosphorylation may also recruit proteins that promote SC formation, since synapsis is defective in Hormad1-deficient mice [16], [38]. In addition, phosphorylation of HORMAD1/2 possibly regulates inter-homolog partner choice in meiotic recombination like yeast Hop1, because this regulation appears to be impaired in the Sycp3 mutant [54].

Axis marks: The meiotic chromosome is spatially and temporally regulated through post-translational modifications and compositional changes of chromosome axis components

The presence or absence of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 can distinguish whether homologs are not synapsed (unsynapsed and desynapsed) or synapsed, respectively [26], [27]. We show here that the presence or absence of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 and the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 can distinguish whether homologs that are not synapsed are unsynapsed or desynapsed, respectively. These findings prompt us to propose that modification status and composition of proteins that constitute the chromosome axis can label chromosomal regions according to the meiotic stage or progression of chromosomal events (Figure 8B). In support of this, a cohesin subunit, RAD21L, is replaced by another subunit, RAD21, in response to completion of recombination at the late pachytene stage [19], [20]. Our proposal is analogous to current models of how histone modifications and variations, which label certain chromatin regions according to DNA damage status and transcriptional activity, contribute to the recruitment of proteins involved in DNA repair, DNA-damage checkpoints and transcriptional regulation. Similarly, combinations of modifications and compositions of chromosome axis components may serve as landmarks for recruitment of proteins involved in recombination, SC formation and checkpoint control.

Our findings shed light on regulations of meiotic chromosomal events through phosphorylation of chromosome axis components. In addition to phosphorylation, other modifications of axis components may mark certain chromosomal regions to regulate meiotic events. Indeed, in yeast, SUMOylation of AE protein(s) regulates recombination and synapsis [55]. Further identification of modification sites and modification enzymes will provide more insights into regulation through the axis marks.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Wild-type C57BL/6 and mutant mice were used in accordance with regulations provided by the animal ethics committee of Karolinska Institutet. The Trip13 [56], Atm [29], Brca1 [57], Spo11 [2], Sycp3 [24], Smc1β [35], Sycp1 [33] and Tex12 [34] mutants were reported previously.

Antibodies

To generate a phospho-specific antibody for Ser³⁷⁵ of HORMAD1 (pS375), rabbits were immunized with a Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated peptide corresponding to amino acids 372–382 of mouse HORMAD1. The anti-pS375 antisera were passed through a column conjugated with the non-phosphorylated peptide to remove fractions cross-reacting with non-phosphorylated HORMAD1. The flow-through fractions were then subjected to affinity-purification using the phosphorylated peptide. The purified antibody was further passed through a column conjugated with the non-phosphorylated peptide. The flow-through fractions were collected and concentrated by ultrafiltration (Amicon, Millipore). The following antibodies were also used: guinea pig anti-SYCP2, anti-SMC1β, anti-STAG3, anti-REC8 and anti-SYCP1 antibodies [58]; guinea pig anti-HORMAD1antibody [26]; rabbit anti-HORMAD1 antibody (13917-1-AP) from Proteintech Group; rabbit anti-pS/T-Q antibody (#2851) from Cell Signaling Technology; rabbit anti-pS1083 antibodies (A300-480A and IHC-00070) from Bethyl Laboratories; mouse and rabbit anti-γH2AX antibodies (#05-636 and #07-164) from Millipore; mouse anti-SYCP3 (sc-74569), rabbit anti-HORMAD2 (sc-82192), goat anti-SMC3 (sc-8198) and goat anti-ATR (sc-1887) antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; rabbit anti-SMC3 (ab9263) and rabbit anti-SYCP1 (ab15090) antibodies from Abcam; mouse anti-SYCP1 antibody (a gift from C. Heyting).

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation

Testis nuclear extracts were prepared as described previously [26]. For phosphatase treatment, nuclear extracts were incubated with λ-phosphatase (New England Biolabs) in the presence or absence of phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Merck) for 90 min at 30°C. For fractionation of nuclear extracts, testes were homogenized in a buffer containing 0.32 M Sucrose, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and the complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). After centrifugation at 1000 g, the pellet was suspended in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and protease inhibitors. After centrifugation at 16000 g, the supernatant was collected as a soluble fraction. The pellet was resuspended in the same buffer. After sonication and centrifugation at 16000 g, the supernatant was recovered as an insoluble fraction. Proteins were separated on a 5, 8, or 10% polyacrylamide gel to detect slow-migrating forms or on a 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen), and were subsequently transferred onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously [26].

Immunofluorescence staining

For preparation of nuclear spreads, a drying-down technique [59] was used. Indirect immunofluorescence analysis was performed using previously described antibodies [26]. We also used the following primary antibodies and dilutions: anti-pS375, 1∶100; anti-pS1083, 1∶100; anti-γH2AX, 1∶400; anti-ATR, 1∶50. Slides were viewed at room temperature using Leica DMRA2 and DMRXA microscopes. Images were captured with a Hamamatsu digital charge-coupled device camera C4742-95 and processed with Openlab 3.1.4 software (Improvision) and Adobe Photoshop.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Meiotic chromosome axis proteins were analyzed as in Figure 1A. The positions of molecular weight markers are presented on the left.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.9MB, tif)}

Figure S2

HORMAD1 and SMC3 are phosphorylated at unsynapsed chromosome axes. (A and B) Nuclear spreads of oocytes from embryonic ovaries were analyzed by immunostaining. The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 (A) and the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (B) were labeled by phosphorylation-specific antibodies. Chromosome axes were labeled by SYCP3 and unsynapsed and desynapsed axes were marked by HORMAD1. Arrows indicate synapsed regions of homologs. Arrowheads indicate desynapsed regions of homologs. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5.3MB, tif)}

Figure S3

SMC3 is phosphorylated during prophase I. (A) Testis nuclear extracts from juvenile mice of each age were immunoprecipitated with the anti-SMC3 antibody. 80% of the immunoprecipitated SMC3 and the rest were separated on a gradient gel and immunoblotted with antibodies against the Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 (pS1083) and normal SMC3, respectively. (B) Nuclear spreads of spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS1083, anti-SMC3 and anti-SYCP3 antibodies. Arrowheads indicate the XY bivalent. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4MB, tif)}

Figure S4

HORMAD1 and SMC3 are phosphorylated on unsynapsed chromosomes in the absence of ATM. (A) Nuclear spreads of Atm ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375, anti-SYCP3 and anti-SYCP1 antibodies. (B) Nuclear spreads of Atm ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS1083, anti-SYCP3 and anti-SYCP1 antibodies. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.5MB, tif)}

Figure S5

Localization of the Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 and ATR during the prophase I stage of meiosis. Nuclear spreads of spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375, anti-SYCP3 and anti-ATR antibodies. Arrowheads indicate the XY bivalent. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.2MB, tif)}

Figure S6

HORMAD1 is phosphorylated on unsynapsed chromosomes in the absence of SYCP1, TEX12 or SMC1β. (A–C) Nuclear spreads of Sycp1 ^−/− (A), Tex12 ^−/− (B) and Smc1β ^−/− (C) zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375, anti-SYCP3 and anti-HORMAD1 antibodies. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.6MB, tif)}

Figure S7

Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and SMC3 in the absence of SYCP3. (A) Nuclear spreads of Sycp3 ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS375 and anti-REC8 antibodies. (B) Nuclear spreads of Sycp3 ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-HORMAD1 and anti-REC8 antibodies. HORMAD1 is loaded on cohesin cores. (C) Nuclear spreads of Sycp3 ^−/− zygotene-like spermatocytes were labeled with anti-pS1083 and anti-REC8 antibodies. The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 was detected as foci along the discontinuous cohesin cores. Bars, 10 µm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.2MB, tif)}

Acknowledgments

We thank Christa Heyting and Albert Pastink for the Sycp1 mutant, Rolf Jessberger for the Smc1β mutant, and Kerry Schimenti for technical assistance. We also thank Anna Kouznetsova for critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (http://www.cancerfonden.se), the Swedish Research Council (http://www.vr.se), Torsten och Ragnar Söderbergs Stiftelser (http://www.soderbergsstiftelser.se), and Karolinska Institutet (http://www.ki.se). RDC-O was supported by the NIDDK (NIH) Intramural Research Program (http://www2.niddk.nih.gov). TF was supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Uehara Memorial Foundation (http://www.ueharazaidan.com) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (http://www.jsps.go.jp). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1.Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2001;52:1–53. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(01)52008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell. 2000;6:975–987. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell. 2000;6:989–998. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Zickler D, Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:603–754. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Page SL, Hawley RS. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:525–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell. 2003;112:423–440. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Hochwagen A, Amon A. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol. 2006;16:R217–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7203–7215. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, et al. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:737–742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406212102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:207–216. doi: 10.1038/nrg2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Handel MA, Schimenti JC. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:124–136. doi: 10.1038/nrg2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:497–508. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00093-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2005;37:41–47. doi: 10.1038/ng1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc'his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, et al. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Royo H, Polikiewicz G, Mahadevaiah SK, Prosser H, Mitchell M, et al. Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr Biol. 2010;20:2117–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Daniel K, Lange J, Hached K, Fu J, Anastassiadis K, et al. Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:599–610. doi: 10.1038/ncb2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm −/− spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3233–3245. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Suja JA, Barbero JL. Cohesin complexes and sister chromatid cohesion in mammalian meiosis. Genome Dyn. 2009;5:94–116. doi: 10.1159/000166622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Lee J, Hirano T. RAD21L, a novel cohesin subunit implicated in linking homologous chromosomes in mammalian meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201008005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Ishiguro K, Kim J, Fujiyama-Nakamura S, Kato S, Watanabe Y. A new meiosis-specific cohesin complex implicated in the cohesin code for homologous pairing. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:267–275. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Herran Y, Gutierrez-Caballero C, Sanchez-Martin M, Hernandez T, Viera A, et al. The cohesin subunit RAD21L functions in meiotic synapsis and exhibits sexual dimorphism in fertility. EMBO J. 2011;30:3091–3105. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Kuroda M, Oikawa K, Ohbayashi T, Yoshida K, Yamada K, et al. A dioxin sensitive gene, mammalian WAPL, is implicated in spermatogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Fukuda T, Hoog C. Mouse cohesin-associated protein PDS5B is expressed in testicular cells and is associated with the meiotic chromosome axes. Genes. 2010;1:484–494. doi: 10.3390/genes1030484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Yuan L, Liu JG, Zhao J, Brundell E, Daneholt B, et al. The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol Cell. 2000;5:73–83. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Yang F, De La Fuente R, Leu NA, Baumann C, McLaughlin KJ, et al. Mouse SYCP2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:497–507. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Fukuda T, Daniel K, Wojtasz L, Toth A, Hoog C. A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:158–171. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Luo H, Li Y, Mu JJ, Zhang J, Tonaka T, et al. Regulation of intra-S phase checkpoint by ionizing radiation (IR)-dependent and IR-independent phosphorylation of SMC3. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:19176–19183. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802299200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Barlow C, Liyanage M, Moens PB, Tarsounas M, Nagashima K, et al. Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development. 1998;125:4007–4017. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.20.4007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Foray N, Marot D, Gabriel A, Randrianarison V, Carr AM, et al. A subset of ATM- and ATR-dependent phosphorylation events requires the BRCA1 protein. EMBO J. 2003;22:2860–2871. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Turner JM, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S, et al. BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol. 2004;14:2135–2142. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Xu X, Aprelikova O, Moens P, Deng CX, Furth PA. Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice. Development. 2003;130:2001–2012. doi: 10.1242/dev.00410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.de Vries FA, de Boer E, van den Bosch M, Baarends WM, Ooms M, et al. Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1376–1389. doi: 10.1101/gad.329705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Hamer G, Wang H, Bolcun-Filas E, Cooke HJ, Benavente R, et al. Progression of meiotic recombination requires structural maturation of the central element of the synaptonemal complex. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2445–2451. doi: 10.1242/jcs.033233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Hodges CA, Hunt PA, et al. Cohesin SMC1β is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:555–562. doi: 10.1038/ncb1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Liebe B, Alsheimer M, Hoog C, Benavente R, Scherthan H. Telomere attachment, meiotic chromosome condensation, pairing, and bouquet stage duration are modified in spermatocytes lacking axial elements. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:827–837. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Pelttari J, Hoja MR, Yuan L, Liu JG, Brundell E, et al. A meiotic chromosomal core consisting of cohesin complex proteins recruits DNA recombination proteins and promotes synapsis in the absence of an axial element in mammalian meiotic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5667–5677. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.16.5667-5677.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Shin YH, Choi Y, Erdin SU, Yatsenko SA, Kloc M, et al. Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet. 2001;27:271–276. doi: 10.1038/85830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Hamer G, Novak I, Kouznetsova A, Hoog C. Disruption of pairing and synapsis of chromosomes causes stage-specific apoptosis of male meiotic cells. Theriogenology. 2008;69:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Lammers JH, van Aalderen M, Peters AH, van Pelt AA, de Rooij DG, et al. A change in the phosphorylation pattern of the 30000–33000 Mr synaptonemal complex proteins of the rat between early and mid-pachytene. Chromosoma. 1995;104:154–163. doi: 10.1007/BF00352179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Prieto I, Suja JA, Pezzi N, Kremer L, Martinez AC, et al. Mammalian STAG3 is a cohesin specific to sister chromatid arms in meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:761–766. doi: 10.1038/35087082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Lee J, Iwai T, Yokota T, Yamashita M. Temporally and spatially selective loss of Rec8 protein from meiotic chromosomes during mammalian meiosis. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2781–2790. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Eijpe M, Offenberg H, Jessberger R, Revenkova E, Heyting C. Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:657–670. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Bannister LA, Reinholdt LG, Munroe RJ, Schimenti JC. Positional cloning and characterization of mouse mei8, a disrupted allelle of the meiotic cohesin Rec8. Genesis. 2004;40:184–194. doi: 10.1002/gene.20085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Xu H, Beasley MD, Warren WD, van der Horst GT, McKay MJ. Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev Cell. 2005;8:949–961. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Wang H, Hoog C. Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:485–495. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, et al. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e69. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell. 2008;132:758–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Brar GA, Hochwagen A, Ee LS, Amon A. The multiple roles of cohesin in meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and pairing. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:1030–1047. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-06-0637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.James RD, Schmiesing JA, Peters AH, Yokomori K, Disteche CM. Differential association of SMC1α and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes in wild-type and SPO11-deficient male mice. Chromosome Res. 2002;10:549–560. doi: 10.1023/a:1020910601858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Watrin E, Peters JM. The cohesin complex is required for the DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2009;28:2625–2635. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Wassmann K, Liberal V, Benezra R. Mad2 phosphorylation regulates its association with Mad1 and the APC/C. EMBO J. 2003;22:797–806. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Li XC, Bolcun-Filas E, Schimenti JC. Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice. Genetics. 2011;189:71–82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Watts FZ, Hoffmann E. SUMO meets meiosis: An encounter at the synaptonemal complex: SUMO chains and sumoylated proteins suggest that heterogeneous and complex interactions lie at the centre of the synaptonemal complex. Bioessays. 2011;33:529–537. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Li XC, Schimenti JC. Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (Trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Xu X, Qiao W, Linke SP, Cao L, Li WM, et al. Genetic interactions between tumor suppressors Brca1 and p53 in apoptosis, cell cycle and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2001;28:266–271. doi: 10.1038/90108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Kouznetsova A, Novak I, Jessberger R, Hoog C. SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2271–2278. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 1997;5:66–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1018445520117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Meiotic chromosome axis proteins were analyzed as in Figure 1A. The positions of molecular weight markers are presented on the left.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.9MB, tif)}

Figure S2

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5.3MB, tif)}

Figure S3

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4MB, tif)}

Figure S4

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.5MB, tif)}

Figure S5

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.2MB, tif)}

Figure S6

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.6MB, tif)}

Figure S7

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.2MB, tif)}

[pgen.1002485-Keeney1] 1.Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2001;52:1–53. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(01)52008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Romanienko1] 2.Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell. 2000;6:975–987. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Baudat1] 3.Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell. 2000;6:989–998. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Zickler1] 4.Zickler D, Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:603–754. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Page1] 5.Page SL, Hawley RS. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:525–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Petronczki1] 6.Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell. 2003;112:423–440. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Hochwagen1] 7.Hochwagen A, Amon A. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol. 2006;16:R217–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Barchi1] 8.Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7203–7215. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-DiGiacomo1] 9.Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, et al. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:737–742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406212102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Burgoyne1] 10.Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:207–216. doi: 10.1038/nrg2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Handel1] 11.Handel MA, Schimenti JC. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:124–136. doi: 10.1038/nrg2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-FernandezCapetillo1] 12.Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:497–508. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00093-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Turner1] 13.Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2005;37:41–47. doi: 10.1038/ng1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Mahadevaiah1] 14.Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc'his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, et al. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Royo1] 15.Royo H, Polikiewicz G, Mahadevaiah SK, Prosser H, Mitchell M, et al. Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr Biol. 2010;20:2117–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Daniel1] 16.Daniel K, Lange J, Hached K, Fu J, Anastassiadis K, et al. Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:599–610. doi: 10.1038/ncb2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Bellani1] 17.Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm −/− spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3233–3245. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Suja1] 18.Suja JA, Barbero JL. Cohesin complexes and sister chromatid cohesion in mammalian meiosis. Genome Dyn. 2009;5:94–116. doi: 10.1159/000166622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Lee1] 19.Lee J, Hirano T. RAD21L, a novel cohesin subunit implicated in linking homologous chromosomes in mammalian meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201008005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Ishiguro1] 20.Ishiguro K, Kim J, Fujiyama-Nakamura S, Kato S, Watanabe Y. A new meiosis-specific cohesin complex implicated in the cohesin code for homologous pairing. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:267–275. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Herran1] 21.Herran Y, Gutierrez-Caballero C, Sanchez-Martin M, Hernandez T, Viera A, et al. The cohesin subunit RAD21L functions in meiotic synapsis and exhibits sexual dimorphism in fertility. EMBO J. 2011;30:3091–3105. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Kuroda1] 22.Kuroda M, Oikawa K, Ohbayashi T, Yoshida K, Yamada K, et al. A dioxin sensitive gene, mammalian WAPL, is implicated in spermatogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Fukuda1] 23.Fukuda T, Hoog C. Mouse cohesin-associated protein PDS5B is expressed in testicular cells and is associated with the meiotic chromosome axes. Genes. 2010;1:484–494. doi: 10.3390/genes1030484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Yuan1] 24.Yuan L, Liu JG, Zhao J, Brundell E, Daneholt B, et al. The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol Cell. 2000;5:73–83. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Yang1] 25.Yang F, De La Fuente R, Leu NA, Baumann C, McLaughlin KJ, et al. Mouse SYCP2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:497–507. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Fukuda2] 26.Fukuda T, Daniel K, Wojtasz L, Toth A, Hoog C. A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:158–171. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Wojtasz1] 27.Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Luo1] 28.Luo H, Li Y, Mu JJ, Zhang J, Tonaka T, et al. Regulation of intra-S phase checkpoint by ionizing radiation (IR)-dependent and IR-independent phosphorylation of SMC3. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:19176–19183. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802299200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Barlow1] 29.Barlow C, Liyanage M, Moens PB, Tarsounas M, Nagashima K, et al. Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development. 1998;125:4007–4017. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.20.4007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Foray1] 30.Foray N, Marot D, Gabriel A, Randrianarison V, Carr AM, et al. A subset of ATM- and ATR-dependent phosphorylation events requires the BRCA1 protein. EMBO J. 2003;22:2860–2871. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Turner2] 31.Turner JM, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S, et al. BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol. 2004;14:2135–2142. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Xu1] 32.Xu X, Aprelikova O, Moens P, Deng CX, Furth PA. Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice. Development. 2003;130:2001–2012. doi: 10.1242/dev.00410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-deVries1] 33.de Vries FA, de Boer E, van den Bosch M, Baarends WM, Ooms M, et al. Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1376–1389. doi: 10.1101/gad.329705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Hamer1] 34.Hamer G, Wang H, Bolcun-Filas E, Cooke HJ, Benavente R, et al. Progression of meiotic recombination requires structural maturation of the central element of the synaptonemal complex. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2445–2451. doi: 10.1242/jcs.033233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Revenkova1] 35.Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Hodges CA, Hunt PA, et al. Cohesin SMC1β is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:555–562. doi: 10.1038/ncb1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Liebe1] 36.Liebe B, Alsheimer M, Hoog C, Benavente R, Scherthan H. Telomere attachment, meiotic chromosome condensation, pairing, and bouquet stage duration are modified in spermatocytes lacking axial elements. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:827–837. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Pelttari1] 37.Pelttari J, Hoja MR, Yuan L, Liu JG, Brundell E, et al. A meiotic chromosomal core consisting of cohesin complex proteins recruits DNA recombination proteins and promotes synapsis in the absence of an axial element in mammalian meiotic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5667–5677. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.16.5667-5677.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Shin1] 38.Shin YH, Choi Y, Erdin SU, Yatsenko SA, Kloc M, et al. Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Mahadevaiah2] 39.Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet. 2001;27:271–276. doi: 10.1038/85830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Hamer2] 40.Hamer G, Novak I, Kouznetsova A, Hoog C. Disruption of pairing and synapsis of chromosomes causes stage-specific apoptosis of male meiotic cells. Theriogenology. 2008;69:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Lammers1] 41.Lammers JH, van Aalderen M, Peters AH, van Pelt AA, de Rooij DG, et al. A change in the phosphorylation pattern of the 30000–33000 Mr synaptonemal complex proteins of the rat between early and mid-pachytene. Chromosoma. 1995;104:154–163. doi: 10.1007/BF00352179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Prieto1] 42.Prieto I, Suja JA, Pezzi N, Kremer L, Martinez AC, et al. Mammalian STAG3 is a cohesin specific to sister chromatid arms in meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:761–766. doi: 10.1038/35087082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Lee2] 43.Lee J, Iwai T, Yokota T, Yamashita M. Temporally and spatially selective loss of Rec8 protein from meiotic chromosomes during mammalian meiosis. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2781–2790. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Eijpe1] 44.Eijpe M, Offenberg H, Jessberger R, Revenkova E, Heyting C. Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:657–670. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Bannister1] 45.Bannister LA, Reinholdt LG, Munroe RJ, Schimenti JC. Positional cloning and characterization of mouse mei8, a disrupted allelle of the meiotic cohesin Rec8. Genesis. 2004;40:184–194. doi: 10.1002/gene.20085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Xu2] 46.Xu H, Beasley MD, Warren WD, van der Horst GT, McKay MJ. Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev Cell. 2005;8:949–961. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Wang1] 47.Wang H, Hoog C. Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:485–495. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Hauf1] 48.Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, et al. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e69. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Carballo1] 49.Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell. 2008;132:758–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Brar1] 50.Brar GA, Hochwagen A, Ee LS, Amon A. The multiple roles of cohesin in meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and pairing. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:1030–1047. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-06-0637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-James1] 51.James RD, Schmiesing JA, Peters AH, Yokomori K, Disteche CM. Differential association of SMC1α and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes in wild-type and SPO11-deficient male mice. Chromosome Res. 2002;10:549–560. doi: 10.1023/a:1020910601858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Watrin1] 52.Watrin E, Peters JM. The cohesin complex is required for the DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2009;28:2625–2635. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Wassmann1] 53.Wassmann K, Liberal V, Benezra R. Mad2 phosphorylation regulates its association with Mad1 and the APC/C. EMBO J. 2003;22:797–806. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Li1] 54.Li XC, Bolcun-Filas E, Schimenti JC. Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice. Genetics. 2011;189:71–82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Watts1] 55.Watts FZ, Hoffmann E. SUMO meets meiosis: An encounter at the synaptonemal complex: SUMO chains and sumoylated proteins suggest that heterogeneous and complex interactions lie at the centre of the synaptonemal complex. Bioessays. 2011;33:529–537. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Li2] 56.Li XC, Schimenti JC. Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (Trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Xu3] 57.Xu X, Qiao W, Linke SP, Cao L, Li WM, et al. Genetic interactions between tumor suppressors Brca1 and p53 in apoptosis, cell cycle and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2001;28:266–271. doi: 10.1038/90108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Kouznetsova1] 58.Kouznetsova A, Novak I, Jessberger R, Hoog C. SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2271–2278. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pgen.1002485-Peters1] 59.Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 1997;5:66–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1018445520117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Phosphorylation of Chromosome Core Components May Serve as Axis Marks for the Status of Chromosomal Events during Mammalian Meiosis

Tomoyuki Fukuda

Florencia Pratto

John C Schimenti

James M A Turner

R Daniel Camerini-Otero

Christer Höög

Roles

Abstract

Author Summary

Introduction

Results

Chromosome axis proteins are differentially phosphorylated during the prophase I stage of meiosis

Figure 1. Chromosome axis proteins are phosphorylated during prophase I.

The Ser375-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 is restricted to unsynapsed chromosomal axes

Figure 2. HORMAD1 is phosphorylated at Ser375 on unsynapsed chromosomes.

The Ser1083-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is preferentially associated with unsynapsed chromosomal regions

Figure 3. SMC3 is phosphorylated at Ser1083 during prophase I.

Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 partially depends on BRCA1 but not on ATM

Figure 4. Phosphorylation of chromosome axis proteins in the absence of a checkpoint protein.

SPO11 is required for normal levels of phosphorylation of HORMAD1, HORMAD2, and SMC3

Figure 5. Phosphorylation of HORMAD1, HORMAD2, and SMC3 is highly dependent on SPO11.

Efficient phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 requires SYCP3

Figure 6. Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 is reduced in the absence of SYCP3.

Sycp3 −/− spermatocytes are defective in distributing ATR to unsynapsed chromosomal regions

Figure 7. Distribution of ATR at unsynapsed chromosomal regions is impaired in the absence of SYCP3.

Discussion

Meiotic chromosome axis proteins are phosphorylated

Phosphorylation of SMC3 occurs at unsynapsed chromosomal regions and depends on recombination

Figure 8. Chromosomal regions are marked by compositional differences and modification status of axis proteins.

Phosphorylation of HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 may be part of a surveillance system monitoring synapsis

Axis marks: The meiotic chromosome is spatially and temporally regulated through post-translational modifications and compositional changes of chromosome axis components

Materials and Methods

Animals

Antibodies

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation

Immunofluorescence staining

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

The Ser³⁷⁵-phosphorylated form of HORMAD1 is restricted to unsynapsed chromosomal axes

Figure 2. HORMAD1 is phosphorylated at Ser³⁷⁵ on unsynapsed chromosomes.

The Ser¹⁰⁸³-phosphorylated form of SMC3 is preferentially associated with unsynapsed chromosomal regions

Figure 3. SMC3 is phosphorylated at Ser¹⁰⁸³ during prophase I.

Sycp3 ^−/− spermatocytes are defective in distributing ATR to unsynapsed chromosomal regions