Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1979 Feb;6(2):609–623. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.2.609

Urea-induced binding of histone 1 to nucleosomes lacking linker DNA.

S A Newman, P Noon
PMCID: PMC327716  PMID: 424307

Abstract

The binding of H1 (and H5) to nucleosome core particles was demonstrated by separating mononucleosomes according to their DNA size on acrylamide gels containing high molarity urea. The presence of urea causes a redistribution of H1 so that it associates with some particles of all linker lengths, including no linker. When the urea is removed the H1 remains associated with particles of all DNA sizes if the different size classes are not mixed with each other. Therefore, urea can effect the transfer of H1 from particles with linker to particles with no linker. When nucleosomes of uniform DNA fragment length, some containing and some lacking H1, are re-electrophoresed under native conditions, they migrate as two widely separated bands. The mobilities of these variants do not depend on linker length and are identical to the mobilities of native H1-containing and H1-lacking particles. When the same collection of particles is electrophoresed in the presence of high molarity urea they migrate with a uniform mobility. These results suggest that H1-containing nucleosomes are conformationally different from H1-lacking particles, but that this difference is eliminated when histone-histone interactions are disrupted by urea.

Full text

PDF
609

Images in this article

612Image
on p.612
613Image
on p.613
614Image
on p.614
616Image
on p.616
618Image
on p.618
619Image
on p.619
620Image
on p.620

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakayev V. V., Bakayeva T. G., Varshavsky A. J. Nucleosomes and subnucleosomes: heterogeneity and composition. Cell. 1977 Jul;11(3):619–629. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonner W. M. Proximity and accessibility studies of histones in nuclei and free nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jan;5(1):71–85. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradbury E. M., Danby S. E., Rattle H. W., Giancotti V. Studies on the role and mode of operation of the very-lysine-rich histone H1 (F1) in eukaryote chromatin. Histone H1 in chromatin and in H1 - DNA complexes. Eur J Biochem. 1975 Sep 1;57(1):97–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garel A., Axel R. Selective digestion of transcriptionally active ovalbumin genes from oviduct nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):3966–3970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaubatz J. W., Chalkley R. Distribution of H1 histone in chromatin digested by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Oct;4(10):3281–3301. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.10.3281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodwin G. H., Nicolas R. H., Johns E. W. An improved large scale fractionation of high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Oct 20;405(2):280–291. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ilyin Y. V., Varshavsky A. Y., Mickelsaar U. N., Georgiev G. P. Studies on deoxyribonucleoprotein structure. Redistribution of proteins in mixtures of deoxyribonucleoproteins, DNA and RNA. Eur J Biochem. 1971 Sep 24;22(2):235–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johns E. W. Studies on histones. 7. Preparative methods for histone fractions from calf thymus. Biochem J. 1964 Jul;92(1):55–59. doi: 10.1042/bj0920055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kornberg R. D. Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:931–954. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Noll M. Internal structure of the chromatin subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 1974 Nov;1(11):1573–1578. doi: 10.1093/nar/1.11.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Noll M., Kornberg R. D. Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jan 25;109(3):393–404. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olins D. E., Bryan P. N., Harrington R. E., Hill W. E., Olins A. L. Conformational states of chromatin nu bodies induced by urea. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Jun;4(6):1911–1931. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.6.1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanger F., Air G. M., Barrell B. G., Brown N. L., Coulson A. R., Fiddes C. A., Hutchison C. A., Slocombe P. M., Smith M. Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phi X174 DNA. Nature. 1977 Feb 24;265(5596):687–695. doi: 10.1038/265687a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Varshavsky A. J., Bakayev V. V., Georgiev G. P. Heterogeneity of chromatin subunits in vitro and location of histone H1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Feb;3(2):477–492. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whitlock J. P., Jr, Simpson R. T. Removal of histone H1 exposes a fifty base pair DNA segment between nucleosomes. Biochemistry. 1976 Jul 27;15(15):3307–3314. doi: 10.1021/bi00660a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES