Abstract
Pelvic dilatation is the alteration of the urinary tractmost frequently detected by maternal-fetalultra-sound. Hydronephrosis is not a diagnosis; it is an imagefinding. The diagnosis is the cause that produces it. Since pelvic dilatation is relatively frequent in thenormal fetus, and the definition and diagnosis of hy-dronephrosis are difficult, once it is detected, adequate follow-up is required. Therefore, it is important for the urologist and obstetrician to understanddifferential diagnosis and clinical implications in order to offer an accurate counselling to the parents.
Keywords: ultrasound, prenatal, renal, dilatation
Introduction
Routine fetal ultrasound has revolutionized management of pregnancies by improving accuracy of gestational age assesment and detection of fetal anomalies.
But most findings considered “ abnormalities” are probably normal variants with minimal or uncertain clinical significance. (1,2,3)
In each cases, an abnormal findings can affect parental attitude toward the pregnancy and their unborn baby (4,5). Therefore, it is important for the urologist and obstetrician to understand differential diagnosis and clinical implications in order to offer an accurate counselling to the parents.
Prenatal Hydronephrosis is the most common organspecific fetal condition detected antenatally and one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges (6) .
It occurs in approximately 1% of fetuses ( range 0.6% to 4.3 %) (7).
The diagnosis is based on an increased anteroposterior renal pelvic size in mm, with variable ascertainment criteria between studies.
Prenatal assesment with ultrasonography provides excellent imaging of fluid-filled structures and renal parenchima. This information leds to differential diagnoses and their ramifications.
The differential diagnoses can range from a self-limited condition without clinical significance ( resulting in spontaneous resolution in early infancy, without long term sequelae) to condition that require post-natal treatment.
Discussion
There are many others factors investigated by ultrasound exam in order to assess hydronephrosis: fetal
wellbeing, gestational age, unilaterality versus bilaterality, amniotic fluid volume.
Prenatal hydronephrosis may be caused by various obstructive and non obstructive etiologies (8,9):
ureteropelvic junctions obstruction
vesicoureteral reflux
ureterocele
ureterovesical junction obstruction
ectopic ureter
posteriore urethral valves
megacystis megaureter
physiologic dilatation
multicystc dysplastic kidney
autosomal recessive polycistic kidney disease
exstrophy
Prune- Belly Syndrome
Ultrasound can scan more elements of fetal genitourinary abnormalities:
Hydronephrosis, its grade of severity, with pelviectasis and/or caliectasis;
Caliectasis : intrarenal dilatation
Pelvic anterior-posterior diameter
Renal parenchima echogenicity (less than liver or spleen)
Urothelial thickening
Duplication: separation of renal pelvic sinus echoes whithout hydroneprosis visualization
Renal cysts
Intravescical Cystic structures
Bladder filling: fill and void cycles
Bladder wall thickness
Oligohydramnios
The evaluation of these parameters can explain possibile causes of these findings ( obstructive/ non obstructive etiologies), may be helpful in predicting residual fetal renal function, in establishing neonatal outcome.
The threshold for the diagnosis of hydronephrosis is based on the recognition that renal pelvic diameter may vary with gestational age (10,11,12). There is considerable variation in the definition of prenatal hydronephrosis in the literature. Then this sign is assessed using the grading system (13): from grade 1 to grade 5, when it is associated with severe caliectasis and cortical atrophy.
A recent systematic review of cohort studies of fetus with renal pelvis dilatation (RPD) > 15 mm have shown that the risk of postnatal RPD and obstruction increased as the mean fetal renal pelvis increased from 5 to 15 mm. For a given measure of fetal renal pelvis, the risk of postnatal RPD decreased with gestational age at presentation (14,15,16,17,18).
Some studies evaluated increased renal echogenicity as a sonographic sign for differentiation between obstructive and non obstructive etiologies of fetal bladder distention (19). They found that the criteria of oligohydramnios of anof obstructive etiology; this has implications for prenatal and postnatal management. (20,21, 22).
The total volume of amniotic fluid is also an importantfactor in fetus with hydronephrosis (23). By 16 weeks of gestation most of amniotic fluid is fetal urine. The volume increases until the end of second trimester at a relative constant rate, then it remains steady, and then decreases shortly bifore term ( 24).Oligohydramnios refers to a reduced amount of amniotic fluid , which resutls in pulmonary maldevelopment and somatic compression (25).This sign is due to obstruction and/or renal failure and represent an important prognostic factor for fetal outcome.
Fetal urologic abnormalities encompass a spectrum of disease processes that present a challenge for the pediatric urologist and obstetrician.
Knowledge about the specific conditions will help with prenatal counseling, determination of the need for therapeutic intervention in utero versus early delivery, and the postnatal evaluation and management of these condition.
References
- 1.Morin L, Cendron M, Crombleholm TM, Garmel SH, Kaluber GT, DʼAlton ME. Minimal Hydronephrosis in the fetus: Clinical significance and implications for management. J.Urol. 2000;164:1057–1060. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Odibo AO, Raab E, Elovitz M, Merrill JD, macones GA: Prenatal mild pyelectasis: Evaluating the thresholds of renal pelvic diameter associated with normal postnatal renal function. J Ultrasond Med. 2004;23:513–517. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.4.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chitty LS, Altman DG: Charts of fetal size: Kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:891–897. doi: 10.1002/pd.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Filly RA: Obstetrical sonography: the best way to terrify a pregnant woman. J. Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:1–5. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kleinved JH, Timmermans DR, De Smit DJ, Van der Wall G, Ten kate LP. Does prenatal scrrening influence anxiety levels of pregnant women? A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:354–361. doi: 10.1002/pd.1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.ChudleighT: ChudleighT: Mild pielctasis. Prenat.Diagn. 2001;21:936–941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Livera LN, Brookfiled DS, Egginton JA, Hawnaur JM: Antenatal ultrasonography to detect fetal renal abnormalities: A prospective screening programme. BMJ. 1989;298:1421–1423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6685.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hubert KC, Palmer JS. Current Diagnosis and management of fetal genitourinary Abnormalities. Urol clinic Am. 2007;34:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peters CA. "Perinatal Urology." . In: Campbell's Urology .Wahls; Retik; Vaughan; Wein (Eds) 8 th Edition, VolumeIII, Chapter 51 Philadelphia: Saunders. 2003 (electronic version) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siemens DR, Prouse KA, MacNeily AE, et al. Antenatal hydronephrosis: thresholds of renal pelvic diameter to predict insigni.cant postnatal pelvicalciectasis . Tech Urol. 1998;4:198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grigon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H, Leblond R: Urinary tract dilatation in utero: Classificationa and cilinical applications. Radiology. 1986;160:645–647. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3526402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classi.cation and clinical application. Radiology. 1986;160:645–7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3526402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bernan RE, Parer JT, de Lannoy CW Jr. Placental growth and the formation of amniotic fluid. Nature. 1967;214:678–80. doi: 10.1038/214678a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Daljit K.H, Angie S.W, Ruth G., Winyard P.J.D. Mild Fetal Renal Pelvis Dilatation – Much Ado About Nothing? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:168–177. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00810208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeilen D, Avni FE. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:242–246. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ismaili K, Avni FE, Wissing KM, hall M: Long-term clinical outcome of infants with mild and moderate fetal pyelectasis. Validation of neonatal ultrasound as a screening tool to detect significant nephrouropathies. J Pediatri. 2004;144:759–765. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Linag CC, Cheng PJ, Lin CJ, Chen HW, Chao AS, Chang SD : Outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal hydronephrosis. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aksu N, yavascan O, kangin M, kara OD, Aydin Y, Erdogan H, Tuncel TC, Cetinkaya E, Ozbay E, Sandikcioglu TG. Postnatal management of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20:1253–1259. doi: 10.1007/s00467-005-1989-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaefer M, Peters CA, Retik AB, et al. Increased renal echogenicity: a sonographic sign for di.erentiating between obstructive and nonobstructive etiologies of in utero bladder distention. J Urol. 1997;158:1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harrison MR, Nakayama DK, Noall RA, et al. Managemet of the fetus with a urinary tract malformation. JAMA. 1981;246:635–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gramellini D, Fieni S, Caforio E, benassi G, Bedocchi L, Beseghi U, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy:second versus third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Urinary tract infection: diagnosis, treatment andlong.termmanagement. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2007 http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG54. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berhrman RE, Parer JT, de Lannoy CW Jr. Placental growth and the formation of amniotic fluid. Nature. 1967;214:678–80. doi: 10.1038/214678a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Queenan JT, Thompson W, Whiteld C. Amniotic fluid volume in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;114:34–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90285-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Potter EL. Normal and abnormal development of the kidney. Chicago. Year Book Medical. 1972 [Google Scholar]
