Abstract
p53 is critical in the normal response to a variety of cellular stresses including DNA damage and loss of p53 function is a common feature of many cancers. In hematological malignancies, p53 deletion is less common than in solid malignancies but is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy. Compared to their wild-type (WT) counterparts, hematopoietic progenitor cells lacking p53 have a greater propensity to survive cytokine loss, in part, due to the failure to transcribe Puma, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family member. Using expression arrays, we have further characterized the differences that distinguish p53−/− cells from WT myeloid cells in the presence of Interleukin-3 (IL-3) to determine if such differences contribute to the increased clonogenicity and survival responses observed in p53−/− cells. We show that p53−/− cells have a deregulated intracellular signaling environment and display a more rapid and sustained response to IL-3. This was accompanied by an increase in active ERK1/2 and a dependence on an intact MAP kinase signaling pathway. Contrastingly, we find that p53−/− cells are independent on AKT for their survival. Thus, loss of p53 in myeloid cells results in an altered transcriptional and kinase signaling environment that favors enhanced cytokine signaling.
Introduction
p53 is a critical regulator of the response to DNA damage and oncogenic stress. Loss of p53 function, through mutation or deletion, is a frequent occurrence in human malignancies. In hematological malignancies, p53 deletion, 17p-, is less common, but is a poor prognostic feature. p53 functions to regulate several pathways, including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis through transcriptional upregulation of proapoptotic Bcl-2 genes, in particular Puma/Bbc3 and Noxa [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Loss of p53 protects cells from p53-dependent apoptotic stimuli due to limited Puma and Noxa transcriptional upregulation.
The induction of apoptosis is a key tumor suppressor function of p53, particularly in those cells which acquire other oncogenic lesions [8]. p53-dependent Puma upregulation has a central role in this response, inducing apoptosis in the transformed cells [9]. Interestingly, in response to an acute DNA-damaging stress such as ionizing radiation, p53-dependent upregulation of Puma may actually contribute to tumor development in some models [10], [11]. In this situation, p53-dependent apoptosis induces cell death in thymic cells which have sustained DNA damage but not yet acquired oncogenic mutations. This cell loss creates a niche into which surviving cells with transforming mutations may proliferate.
It is increasingly apparent that p53 also has a critical role in regulating the response to a wide variety of cellular stresses. For example, we and others have shown that deletion of p53 can protect cells against apoptosis induced by cytokine deprivation, in particular Interleukin-3 (IL-3) deprivation [12], [13]. These results complement earlier observations from Lotem and Sachs [14], who showed that untransformed hematopoietic progenitor cells from p53−/− mice formed colonies in limiting doses of cytokine. p53-deficient hematopoietic progenitor cells were also able to form more colonies in the absence of IL-3 compared to wild-type (WT) cells [12]. These experiments clearly suggest that p53 is involved in modulating the sensitivity to cytokine with a loss of p53 increasing viability and growth in the presence of limiting cytokine doses. The p53 response is also coupled to cell death in the absence of cytokine with a failure to upregulate Puma expression a likely explanation for this [12]. Thus, in the presence of IL-3 receptor signaling, a p53-dependent response modulates the sensitivity to cytokine receptor activation and may also contribute to growth and survival differences important for tumorigenesis.
To explore this further we compared the expression profiles of WT cells and p53−/− IL-3 dependent cells [12], hereafter referred to as FDM (Factor Dependent Myeloid) cells, in the presence or absence of IL-3, using microarray analysis. Under normal culture conditions, p53 deleted cells have substantially different gene expression profiles compared to WT cells. Some of these differences are in genes that regulate cytokine signaling, in particular genes such as SOCS1 and SOCS3, and the cell cycle inhibitor p21. The different gene expression profiles suggest that even under optimal growth conditions deletion of p53 alters gene expression rendering cells more responsive to changes in cytokine levels. This may in part explain our and others observation that lower doses of IL-3 are required to maintain viability of p53−/− cells compared to WT cells [14]. In support of this hypothesis, we show that MAP Kinase signaling is activated earlier and in a more sustained manner in p53−/− cells after IL-3 stimulation. Interestingly, we also observed that p53−/− cells treated with an AKT inhibitor were protected from cell death in comparison to WT cells indicating that AKT activation is redundant. In comparison, p53−/− cells were sensitive to an MEK inhibitor indicating that MAP Kinase signaling was required for p53−/− viability.
Expression array analysis of IL-3 withdrawal responsive genes by Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA) of curated pathways indicates that WT samples displayed an identifiable response with pathways such as the JAK-STAT, Insulin and p53 signaling pathways significantly altered. In contrast, the changes in gene expression in p53−/− cells upon IL-3 withdrawal did not show the alterations to downstream cytokine signaling. Thus, the down-modulation of cytokine signaling on withdrawal of cytokine appears to be p53-dependent.
Materials and Methods
Generation of IL-3 dependent FDM cells
Murine WT and p53−/− factor dependent myeloid (FDM) cells were generated previously by HoxB8 transformation [12] and their generation was approved by the animal ethics committee at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AEC 594) and Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (2003.024). All FDM cells were cultured in DMEM (low glucose; Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; JRH Laboratories) plus 0.25 ng/mL IL-3 (R&D systems).
Expression array
Expression array was performed as previously described [12]. Briefly, RNA from three biological replicates per genotype was isolated using Qiagen RNAeasy extraction kit according to the manufacturer's instruction. RNA was labeled, amplified and hybridized to Illumina MouseWG-6 V1 Expression BeadChips according to Illumina standard protocols. Samples were processed at the Australian Genome Research Facility, Melbourne, Australia. A total of 18 arrays comprising over 46,000 transcripts that interrogates the whole mouse genome, were generated covering three time points (0, 6, 18 hours after IL-3 deprivation), and each time series repeated in triplicate with independent biological samples (Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository accession GSE18770).
Expression array analysis
The data were analyzed using the lumi package [15] from Bioconductor [16] and R (R development core, http://www.R-project.org).
Expression array quality assessment
The quality of the array series was assessed using the package arrayQualityMetrics, which offers an extensive set of visualizations and metrics for assessing microarray data quality [17]. Applied to this dataset, arrayQualityMetrics indicates that although in general the data are of good quality, one sample was considered to be an outlier and hence was excluded from further analysis (arrayQualityMetrics). The proportion of expressed probes for each array is represented in Table 1.
Table 1. Proportion of expressed probes for each array.
Genotype and hours withdrawn of IL-3 | WT 0 h | WT 6 h | WT 18 h | p53−/− 0 h | p53−/− 6 h | p53−/− 18 h |
Proportion of expressed probes | 0.319 | 0.340 | 0.330 | 0.319 | 0.319 | 0.301 |
The empirical reliability of each array following a linear model fit was estimated. A normexp-by-control background correction, quantile normalization and log2 transformation was carried out. Probes that failed to achieve a BeadStudio detection p value of 0.01 on any array were deemed to be not expressed, and hence were removed from all subsequent analyses. Hierarchical clustering was carried out which is hierarchical cluster analysis on a set of dissimilarities. These dissimilarities are a distance matrix computed by using the Manhattan distance on the expression data. A linear model was fitted for each probe; subsequently differential expression analysis was carried out.
Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA)
For the signaling pathways available in KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), the Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA) algorithm [18], [19], [20] was conducted. SPIA uses information from differentially expressed genes and their fold changes, as well as pathways topology in order to assess the significance of the pathways in the condition under the study. At time of writing, 80 pathways were available for searching. A false discovery adjusted global p-value cut-off of 0.1 was chosen. A SPIA analysis provides information on the KEGG pathway being perturbed (the KEGG ID), the number of genes in the KEGG pathway (pSize), the number of differentially expressed genes found within the pathway (NDE), the False Discovery Rate (pGFdr), and whether the pathway is activated or inhibited (Status).
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)
Broad GSEA software was used to analyze array results [21], [22]. A mean-rank gene set test to analyze whether a set of genes is highly ranked relative to other genes in terms of the residual standard deviation for each gene taken from the linear model fitted to the array. Genes were considered expressed in the array based on their detection p-value.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM TrisHCl pH 7.4, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (DOC), 0.1% SDS, 1% NP40, protease inhibitor cocktail, 5 mM ßglycerophosphate, 1 mM Na Molybdate, 2 mM Na pyrophosphate, 10 mM NaF). Lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the following antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho Stat5 (Tyr 694; Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-Stat5 (Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho ERK1/2 (Thr 202/Tyr 204; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho AKT (Ser 473; Cell Signaling), mouse monoclonal anti-AKT (Cell Signaling), mouse monoclonal anti-ßactin, goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG coupled to HRP (Sigma Aldrich) and donkey polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG coupled to HRP (Amersham).
Cell Viability Assays
IL-3 was removed by washing cells 3 times in PBS before being cultured in DMEM/10% FCS with or without IL-3 (as indicated) or treated with the AKT inhibitor VIII (Calbiochem) at 0, 0.1 or 0.5 ng/mL or a MEK inhibitor (U0126; Selleck chemicals) at 0, 40 or 200 nM. Cell viability was determined by staining cells with Propidium Iodide (PI, 1 µg/mL; Sigma- Aldrich) followed by flow-cytometric analysis (LSR II; Becton Dickinson).
Clonogenic survival assays
Clonogenic survival assays were performed as previously described [23], [24]. Briefly, 1×104 cells/mL were cultured in DMEM, 10% FCS with or without IL-3 at various concentrations. After three days, cells were plated in 6-well plates in DMEM, 20% FCS, 0.5 ng/mL IL-3, and 0.3% soft agar. After 14 days the numbers of colonies were counted and expressed as a percentage relative to the number of colonies generated per 1000 cells cultured in IL-3. At least 3 independent clones of each genotype were assayed in each experiment.
Results
Gene expression profile of WT and p53−/− FDM cells in the presence of IL-3
Previously, we showed that the apoptotic response to cytokine deprivation in immortalized IL-3 dependent myeloid cells (Factor Dependent Myeloid or FDM cells) differed significantly between cells derived from WT and p53−/− mice. Decreased Puma protein levels in p53−/− cells contributed to the survival advantage exhibited by these cells when starved of IL-3 [12]. We speculated that p53-dependent transcription under non-stress conditions (abundant IL-3) also contributed to the enhanced viability and clonogenicity of p53−/− FDM cells. As previously described [12], RNA samples from three independent clones each of WT and p53−/− FDM cells, 0, 6 and 18 h after IL-3 withdrawal, were analyzed using the Illumina MouseWG-6 Expression BeadChip array. To extract the most significantly variant genes, we considered that significantly differentially expressed genes had an adjusted p-value of 0.1 or lower and a positive B statistic (1000 probes). In the presence of IL-3, 533 probes, representing 519 genes, showed significantly higher expression in the WT samples compared to p53−/− samples and 467 probes representing 431 genes showed significantly reduced expression. The top 30 most differentially expressed genes in WT and p53−/− samples are shown in Figure 1A. Three members of the Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) family, the SH2-containing protein, CISH (also known as CIS or SOCS), SOCS1 and SOCS3 were expressed at significantly higher levels in WT cells, compared to p53−/− cells in the presence of IL-3. The SOCS family of proteins are modulated by various cytokines including IL-2, IL-3, EPO and G-CSF [25]. CISH functions to inhibit STAT5, in the presence of IL-3, resulting in reduced activation of the JAK/STAT pathway [26]. This raises the possibility that in the absence of p53 decreased CISH expression results in amplified IL-3 signaling. To determine whether mRNA levels of SOCS1 and SOCS3 reflected difference in protein expression, we probed lysates from 4 independent WT and 4 independent p53−/− cell lines with antibodies to SOCS1 and SOCS3 (supplemental Figure S1A). These data show that SOCS3 expression varies between cell lines but does not show any consistent elevation in p53−/− cells. Although SOCS1 expression was in fact higher in 2 of 4 p53−/− cell lines than in WT cell lines, these differences were not consistent across all cell lines. In addition, we saw no consistent differences in expression of IL-3 receptor components between WT and p53−/− cell lines. These data suggest that differences in the response to IL-3 signaling between WT and p53−/− cell lines is not explained by expression levels of the IL-3 receptor, SOCS1 or SOCS3.
To highlight the most prominent p53-dependent genes under these conditions we selected genes with a LogFc of greater than 2, since this would identify genes whose expression was much higher in p53−/− than WT (potentially repressed by p53), and genes whose expression was much higher in WT than p53−/− (potentially p53-induced) (Figure 1B and 1C). As expected, well-described p53-dependent genes such as p21 (Cdkn1a) were expressed at significantly lower levels in p53−/− FDM samples compared to WT, indicating our system correctly identified known p53-dependent genes. The genes most significantly over-expressed by fold-change in p53−/− cells other than the Neomycin resistance cassette, were Sphk1, Sphingosine Kinase 1 and Bcl11A suggesting that these are normally down-regulated by p53. Down-regulation of Sphk1 by p53 may be important for the apoptotic response as Sphk1 expression is associated with increased survival [27] and has been described in association with activated PI3K/AKT signaling [28], [29]. Bcl11A is a zinc-finger transcription factor, which is an essential regulator of lymphopoiesis in mice, and its elevated expression has been associated with some lymphoma patients in humans [30], [31], [32], [33]. Interestingly, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia samples with gains at 2p16 locus (mapping to REL and Bcl11a) are more frequent in samples which also bear 17p- (p53 loss) deletions [34], [35]. The mechanism of this correlation is unknown. In our FDM cells, although we identified an increase in Bcl11a mRNA in p53 null samples, protein levels of Bcl11a were not consistently elevated in multiple p53−/− FDM clones compared to WT FDM clones cultured in the presence of IL-3 (Supplementary Figure S1B). Only subtle elevations of isoform 1 (84 kda) and isoform 5 (53 kda) were observed in p53−/− FDM clones.
Pathway Analysis
A Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA) algorithm [18], [19], [20] was performed for the pathways available in KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes). SPIA uses information from a set of differentially expressed genes and their fold changes, as well as pathways topology, to assess the potential significance of a specific pathway being altered in a gene list comparison. A false discovery adjusted global p-value cut-off of 0.1 was chosen. The fifteen pathways that were differentially represented in p53−/− and WT FDM cells are listed in Figure 2A. Since the same genes may be represented in many different pathways, we were interested in which differentially expressed genes accounted for the various pathway calls (Figure 2B). A relatively small group of differentially expressed genes accounted for the many activated or inactivated pathways. For example, all isoforms of Calmodulin (Calm1, Calm2 and Calm3) were represented in 7 different pathways, and were decreased in p53−/− cells. In total, there were 73 differentially expressed genes within these fifteen pathways, with 46 upregulated in WT and 27 upregulated in p53 null samples. MAPK1 expression is represented in all but 2 of the 15 pathways, and was upregulated in p53−/− cells. The Insulin signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathways were identified as pathways which are selectively activated in p53−/− FDM cells suggesting these are normally down-modulated by p53 (Figure 2B). The genes included in these pathways are also known to be involved in cytokine signal transduction such as IL-3 signaling and includes PIK3 gamma (PIK3CG), SOCS1 and 3, MAPK1 and a-Raf. Activation of these pathways in p53−/− FDM cells is consistent with a de-regulated signal transduction environment and raises the possibility that p53−/− cells are intrinsically more responsive to IL-3 and other cytokines.
p53-dependent gene family enrichment in FDM samples
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was done to compare families of genes whose expression most differed between WT and p53−/− FDM cells. The analysis was performed on the listed gene families in Figure 3A [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. The results indicated that the gene families most different between WT to p53−/− FDM samples were the tumor suppressors, kinases and transcription factors. The logFC changes of each of individual differentially expressed kinases are shown in Figure 3B. SGK1 (serum/glucocorticoid kinase 1), and RIPK3 were expressed at approximately a 1.5 fold higher level in p53−/− cells, suggesting p53 functions to regulate the expression of these kinases under physiological conditions. However, RIPK3 protein levels in p53 null lysates were higher than seen in WT cells in 2 of 4 cell lines (Supplemental Figure S1A). SGK1 is a serine-threonine kinase related to AKT/PKB involved in transducing cytokine-dependent survival signals [42] and like Sphk1 its down-regulation may be important for an apoptotic response. In contrast, RIPK3 is a kinase involved in necroptosis activated by TNF Receptor Family signaling.
As mentioned above, Bcl11a was significantly upregulated in p53−/− samples. In WT samples, the lineage-specific transcription factor GFI1 was expressed at approximately 2-fold greater levels relative to p53−/− cells suggesting that p53 levels may contribute lineage choices. GFI1 may repress hematopoietic colony formation and Bcl11A over-expression is associated with proliferative signals and some AML subtypes [43], [44]. Together, these data suggest that a combination of an activated intracellular signaling environment, combined with the expression of transcription factors which favor clonogenic proliferation, contribute to the survival and proliferative advantages observed in p53−/− cells.
FDM transcriptional response to cytokine withdrawal
We also extended the analysis of changes in gene expression in WT and p53−/− FDM cells after IL-3 deprivation beyond the analysis of Bcl-2 family members we have previously published [12]. We used a linear model to determine which genes were differentially expressed in WT or p53−/− at 0 h compared to 6 h and 6 h compared to 18 h post cytokine withdrawal (with the resulting t-statistics classifying genes as either up, down or not significant).
The pathways most affected by 6 h of IL-3 withdrawal were identified by SPIA KEGG analysis (Figure 4A and B). As anticipated, the JAK/STAT, Insulin and p53 signaling pathways were the top 3 pathways identified by SPIA to be responding to IL-3 withdrawal. This type of analysis is not a definitive indication of signaling kinase pathway activation, since the activity of such pathways is dictated by events other than just gene transcription. However, it is interesting that p53-dependent pathways were identified as inactivated in this analysis, indicating p53-dependent transcription contributes to the normal response to IL-3 signaling, as well as the apoptotic response to IL-3 deprivation.
In contrast, the transcriptional differences observed p53−/− FDM samples assayed after 6 h of IL-3 deprivation did not cluster in the same SPIA pathways as WT cells (Figure 4B). By 18 h, only two KEGG pathways in the p53 null cell lines were activated (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S2).
Increased sensitivity of p53−/− FDM cells to IL-3
We wanted to determine if the altered pathway activation or inhibition revealed by gene expression profiling translated into detectable differences in cellular responses to IL-3 signaling. One prediction was that p53−/− cells would initiate IL-3 receptor signaling at lower concentrations of IL-3 than WT cells. To test this, we compared the viability of WT and p53−/− FDM cells in decreasing concentrations of IL-3 ligand in both viability and clonogenic assays (Figure 5A and 5B). At all except the highest concentrations of IL-3 used, more p53−/− FDM cells were viable than WT cells (Figure 5A). After WT or p53−/− FDM cells were cultured in limiting IL-3 doses for three days they were plated in soft agar containing abundant IL-3 (Figure 5B). In this clonogenic assay, p53−/− cells were able to form more colonies than WT cells at limiting IL-3 concentrations. This suggests that IL-3 can transduce survival signals in p53-deleted cells at many fold lower concentrations that in WT cells.
To determine if differential activation of cytokine signaling pathways was occurring in p53−/− FDM cells after IL-3 stimulation, lysates from cells stimulated with various concentrations of IL-3 after a period of IL-3 deprivation were probed with antibodies to detect activation of the signaling kinases AKT, ERK and STAT5 (Figure 5C). The most consistent difference observed was that ERK1/2 phosphorylation occurred in response to lower concentrations of IL-3 in p53−/− FDM cells (see also Supplementary Figure S3). This was consistent with the array data showing higher ERK2 (MAPK1) mRNA levels of in p53−/− FDM cells and pathway analysis which suggested activation of the MAPK pathway. There were no differences in total ERK1/2 levels between WT and p53−/− cells (Figure 5C). This data indicates that loss of p53 resulted in higher levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 activation occurred in response to lower IL-3 ligand concentrations. As transient activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway can have profound effects on cellular response compared to prolonged activation [45], loss of p53 may sensitize cells to transient activation of this pathway leading to a substantial increase in cell survival compared to WT cells.
AKT activation, as indicated by phosphorylation of serine 473 after IL-3 stimulation, was comparable between WT and p53−/− cells, or even slightly blunted in p53−/− cells (Figure 5C). This suggested the possibility ERK activation was relatively more important in p53−/− cells than in WT cells. We treated WT and p53−/− FDM cells, cultured in the presence or absence of IL-3, with increasing concentrations of an AKT or a MEK inhibitor to determine whether p53−/− and WT cells had altered susceptibility to apoptosis induced by these drugs. In response to the AKT inhibitor, WT cells showed a dose-dependent decrease in viability in the presence of IL-3, which was exacerbated by IL-3 deprivation. Intriguingly, p53−/− cells were highly resistant to cell death induced by AKT inhibition, in the presence or absence of IL-3. The withdrawal of IL-3 resulted in the death of approximately 15% of p53−/− FDM cells, but this was not significantly increased by AKT inhibition (Figure 5C). In contrast, the reduction of p53−/− FDM cell viability was similar to the response of WT cells (Figure 5D). To determine whether AKT inhibition also affected ERK1/2 phosphorylation, or if MEK inhibition affected AKT phosphorylation, we probed western blots of lysates from cells treated with either inhibitor for phosphorylated AKT or ERK1/2 (Supplemental Figure S4). There was no evidence to indicate that AKT inhibitor had an impact on ERK1/2 phosphorylation or the reverse. AKT inhibition caused an increase in Puma expression in WT but not p53 null cells. Puma is normally upregulated in response to IL-3 deprivation [12]. It is not surprising therefore that inhibition of AKT results in Puma upregulation. This suggests that in this model there no crosstalk between these two pathways. Taken together, these results suggest that IL-3 dependent FDM cells lacking p53 no longer require AKT signaling to maintain viability, but are, in part at least, dependent on ERK1/2 signaling. This suggests further that regulation of AKT activation in response to IL-3 receptor signaling is p53-dependent.
Discussion
Although loss of function mutations or deletions affecting p53 is frequent in many tumors, it is relatively rare in de novo AML [46] and strongly associated with poorer prognosis. One possible explanation is that p53-dependent proapoptotic proteins such as Puma are important predictors of the responsiveness of many cancer types, including myeloid malignancies, to chemotherapeutic drugs [47]. However, it is also the case that hematopoietic progenitor cells lacking p53 have a greater capacity for clonal proliferation in the absence of any apoptotic stimuli [12]. Our data demonstrates that deletion of p53 results in substantial differences in mRNA expression profiles in cells under normal culture conditions, and that the cell biological correlates of these expression differences manifest as enhanced survival in limiting doses of IL-3 and an amplified signaling response to IL-3 stimulation. This altered response to growth factor signaling may contribute to tumorigenesis and altered responses to treatment observed in the absence of p53.
In this study we did not focus on p53-dependent regulation of apoptosis. We, and others, have shown that p53-dependent upregulation of Puma and Noxa is essential for normal apoptosis in response to p53-dependent death stimuli [3], [4], [6], [23], [48]. At the same time, it has been elegantly demonstrated that the failure of cells to undergo apoptosis does not account for all of the oncogenic effects of loss of p53 function [8]. Indeed, in T-cell lymphoma induced by irradiation, p53-dependent apoptosis was required for tumor development, by removing cells and creating a niche in which malignant cells could proliferate [10], [11].
We sought to determine how p53 null myeloid cells differed from their WT counterparts in the absence of an apoptotic stimulus, and how such differences might contribute to the oncogenic effects of p53 deletion. Expression levels of intracellular kinases such as MAPK and secondary messenger molecules such as the calmodulins suggested that p53−/− hematopoietic cells have activated signal transduction pathways compared to WT cells. However, expression levels alone do not prove the activation of such pathways, nor whether there is any measurable effect on cell behavior. Strikingly, ERK1/2 was more rapidly phosphorylated at lower IL-3 concentrations in cells without p53. This is an indication that MAPK signaling pathways are more readily activated in p53−/− cells. It seems probable that a number of factors, other than the expression levels of kinases, contribute to this phenomenon. For example, p53−/− cells also expressed lower levels of SOCS mRNA and higher levels of RIPK3 which may contribute to cytokine receptor signaling. It is important to note that these mRNA levels did not necessarily correlate with consistent differences in protein expression, emphasizing the importance of validating expression array experiments at a pathway level as well as validating individual proteins. Further, it is also apparent that variations in mRNA expression levels between WT and p53−/− cells do not necessarily reflect differences in p53 response genes. It is likely that many of the observed differences arise because of adaptation to the lack of p53, triggered by deregulation of a smaller number of direct p53 response genes.
Activation of PI3K and AKT is part of the IL-3 receptor signaling pathways which regulate cell viability in response to IL-3 signaling [49]. Our pathway analyses indicated that PI3K expression levels were lower in p53−/− FDM cells than WT cells. When we looked for AKT activation in response to IL-3 stimulation, we observed that AKT was phosphorylated in p53 null cells similarly to WT cells. However, the resistance of p53−/− FDM cells to apoptosis induced by AKT inhibition suggests that AKT activation is not required for IL-3 survival signaling in p53−/− cells. AKT activation and p53 regulation are linked by experimental evidence showing the E3 ubiquitin ligase which regulates p53 stability, MDM2, is itself a substrate of AKT [50]. When cytokine receptor activation results in PI3K/AKT activation, MDM2 is phosphorylated and stabilized, resulting in p53 poly-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Our data, and that of others, suggests that the anti-apoptotic functions of AKT, particularly in the context of IL-3 deprivation or deprivation of metabolic substrates such as glucose, depend critically on p53. In the absence of p53, this pathway becomes redundant. Thus, we conclude that p53 plays an important role in the regulation of signal transduction pathways activated by cytokines such as IL-3.
Interestingly, when p53−/− cells were treated with a MEK inhibitor, they underwent apoptosis similar to WT cells. This indicates that cells lacking p53 retain a dependence on MAP kinase signaling, which is supported by the increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in these cells. Proteomic analysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia samples has indicated that patients with higher levels of p53 (which often is indicative of p53 mutation) also had abundant ERK2 [51]. It is well recognized that loss of p53 is a poor prognostic feature in hematological malignancy, at least in part because cells lacking functional p53 do not activate apoptosis pathways in response to chemotherapeutic drugs [52]. Our data suggest that an alternative treatment strategy in p53-deleted myeloid tumors would be the use of MAP kinase inhibitors. Our data further suggest targeting of the PI3K/AKT pathway is unlikely to be a successful therapeutic option where p53 is deleted or mutated.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Philippe Bouillet and Andreas Strasser for providing the p53−/− mice.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work is supported by the National Health and Research Council (NHMRC) project grant 565212 and was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC Independent Research Institute Infrastructure Support Scheme (IRIISS). PGE is supported by the Sylvia and Charles Viertel Senior Medical Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Oda E, Ohki R, Murasawa H, Nemoto J, Shibue T, et al. Noxa, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family and candidate mediator of p53-induced apoptosis. Science. 2000;288:1053–1058. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5468.1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Han J, Flemington C, Houghton AB, Gu Z, Zambetti GP, et al. Expression of bbc3, a pro-apoptotic BH3-only gene, is regulated by diverse cell death and survival signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11318–11323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201208798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nakano K, Vousden KH. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol Cell. 2001;7:683–694. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00214-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu J, Zhang L, Hwang PM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. PUMA induces the rapid apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2001;7:673–682. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00213-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shibue T, Takeda K, Oda E, Tanaka H, Murasawa H, et al. Integral role of Noxa in p53-mediated apoptotic response. Genes Dev. 2003;17:2233–2238. doi: 10.1101/gad.1103603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Villunger A, Michalak EM, Coultas L, Mullauer F, Bock G, et al. p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins puma and noxa. Science. 2003;302:1036–1038. doi: 10.1126/science.1090072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu J, Wang Z, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Zhang L. PUMA mediates the apoptotic response to p53 in colorectal cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1931–1936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2627984100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Christophorou MA, Ringshausen I, Finch AJ, Swigart LB, Evan GI. The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nature. 2006;443:214–217. doi: 10.1038/nature05077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu J, Zhang L. PUMA, a potent killer with or without p53. Oncogene. 2008;27(Suppl 1):S71–83. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Michalak EM, Vandenberg CJ, Delbridge AR, Wu L, Scott CL, et al. Apoptosis-promoted tumorigenesis: gamma-irradiation-induced thymic lymphomagenesis requires Puma-driven leukocyte death. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1608–1613. doi: 10.1101/gad.1940110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Labi V, Erlacher M, Krumschnabel G, Manzl C, Tzankov A, et al. Apoptosis of leukocytes triggered by acute DNA damage promotes lymphoma formation. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1602–1607. doi: 10.1101/gad.1940210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jabbour AM, Daunt CP, Green BD, Vogel S, Gordon L, et al. Myeloid progenitor cells lacking p53 exhibit delayed up-regulation of Puma and prolonged survival after cytokine deprivation. Blood. 2010;115:344–352. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao Y, Coloff JL, Ferguson EC, Jacobs SR, Cui K, et al. Glucose metabolism attenuates p53 and Puma-dependent cell death upon growth factor deprivation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:36344–36353. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803580200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lotem J, Sachs L. Hematopoietic cells from mice deficient in wild-type p53 are more resistant to induction of apoptosis by some agents. Blood. 1993;82:1092–1096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Du P, Kibbe WA, Lin SM. lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1547–1548. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kauffmann A, Gentleman R, Huber W. arrayQualityMetrics–a bioconductor package for quality assessment of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:415–416. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tarca AL, Draghici S, Khatri P, Hassan SS, Mittal P, et al. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:75–82. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khatri P, Voichita C, Kattan K, Ansari N, Khatri A, et al. Onto-Tools: new additions and improvements in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W206–211. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL, Amin K, Done A, et al. A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res. 2007;17:1537–1545. doi: 10.1101/gr.6202607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–273. doi: 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ekert PG, Jabbour AM, Manoharan A, Heraud JE, Yu J, et al. Cell death provoked by loss of interleukin-3 signaling is independent of Bad, Bim, and PI3 kinase, but depends in part on Puma. Blood. 2006;108:1461–1468. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-014209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ekert PG, Read SH, Silke J, Marsden VS, Kaufmann H, et al. Apaf-1 and caspase-9 accelerate apoptosis, but do not determine whether factor-deprived or drug-treated cells die. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:835–842. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200312031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yoshimura A, Nishinakamura H, Matsumura Y, Hanada T. Negative regulation of cytokine signaling and immune responses by SOCS proteins. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:100–110. doi: 10.1186/ar1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Croker BA, Kiu H, Nicholson SE. SOCS regulation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19:414–422. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amato R, D'Antona L, Porciatti G, Agosti V, Menniti M, et al. Sgk1 activates MDM2-dependent p53 degradation and affects cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. J Mol Med. 2009;87:1221–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0525-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Song L, Xiong H, Li J, Liao W, Wang L, et al. Sphingosine Kinase-1 Enhances Resistance to Apoptosis through Activation of PI3K/Akt/NF-{kappa}B Pathway in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1839–1849. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marfe G, Di Stefano C, Gambacurta A, Ottone T, Martini V, et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 overexpression is regulated by signaling through PI3K, AKT2, and mTOR in imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Exp Hematol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu P, Keller JR, Ortiz M, Tessarollo L, Rachel RA, et al. Bcl11a is essential for normal lymphoid development. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:525–532. doi: 10.1038/ni925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ferreira BI, Garcia JF, Suela J, Mollejo M, Camacho FI, et al. Comparative genome profiling across subtypes of low-grade B-cell lymphoma identifies type-specific and common aberrations that target genes with a role in B-cell neoplasia. Haematologica. 2008;93:670–679. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Satterwhite E, Sonoki T, Willis TG, Harder L, Nowak R, et al. The BCL11 gene family: involvement of BCL11A in lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2001;98:3413–3420. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.12.3413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Agueli C, Cammarata G, Salemi D, Dagnino L, Nicoletti R, et al. 14q32/miRNA clusters loss of heterozygosity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with up-regulation of BCL11a. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:575–578. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pfeifer D, Pantic M, Skatulla I, Rawluk J, Kreutz C, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number changes and LOH in CLL using high-density SNP arrays. Blood. 2007;109:1202–1210. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Forconi F, Rinaldi A, Kwee I, Sozzi E, Raspadori D, et al. Genome-wide DNA analysis identifies recurrent imbalances predicting outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion. Br J Haematol. 2008;143:532–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Megan Kong Y, Dahlke C, Xiang Q, Qian Y, Karp D, et al. Toward an ontology-based framework for clinical research databases. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Messina DN, Glasscock J, Gish W, Lovett M. An ORFeome-based analysis of human transcription factor genes and the construction of a microarray to interrogate their expression. Genome Res. 2004;14:2041–2047. doi: 10.1101/gr.2584104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moreland RT, Ryan JF, Pan C, Baxevanis AD. The Homeodomain Resource: a comprehensive collection of sequence, structure, interaction, genomic and functional information on the homeodomain protein family. Database (Oxford) 2009;2009:bap004. doi: 10.1093/database/bap004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zola H, Swart B, Banham A, Barry S, Beare A, et al. CD molecules 2006–human cell differentiation molecules. J Immunol Methods. 2007;319:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298:1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Futreal PA, Coin L, Marshall M, Down T, Hubbard T, et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:177–183. doi: 10.1038/nrc1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Endo T, Kusakabe M, Sunadome K, Yamamoto T, Nishida E. The kinase SGK1 in the endoderm and mesoderm promotes ectodermal survival by down-regulating components of the death-inducing signaling complex. Sci Signal. 2011;4:ra2. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yin B, Delwel R, Valk PJ, Wallace MR, Loh ML, et al. A retroviral mutagenesis screen reveals strong cooperation between Bcl11a overexpression and loss of the Nf1 tumor suppressor gene. Blood. 2009;113:1075–1085. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-144436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khandanpour C, Kosan C, Gaudreau MC, Duhrsen U, Hebert J, et al. Growth Factor Independence 1 (Gfi1) Protects Hematopoietic Stem Cells Against Apoptosis But Also Prevents the Development of a Myeloproliferative-Like Disease. Stem Cells. 2010 doi: 10.1002/stem.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yamamoto T, Ebisuya M, Ashida F, Okamoto K, Yonehara S, et al. Continuous ERK activation downregulates antiproliferative genes throughout G1 phase to allow cell-cycle progression. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1171–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Renneville A, Roumier C, Biggio V, Nibourel O, Boissel N, et al. Cooperating gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a review of the literature. Leukemia. 2008;22:915–931. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ni Chonghaile T, Sarosiek KA, Vo TT, Ryan JA, Tammareddi A, et al. Pretreatment mitochondrial priming correlates with clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Science. 2011;334:1129–1133. doi: 10.1126/science.1206727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jeffers JR, Parganas E, Lee Y, Yang C, Wang J, et al. Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:321–328. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Letai A. Growth factor withdrawal and apoptosis: the middle game. Mol Cell. 2006;21:728–730. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mayo LD, Donner DB. The PTEN, Mdm2, p53 tumor suppressor-oncoprotein network. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002;27:462–467. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(02)02166-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kornblau SM, Tibes R, Qiu YH, Chen W, Kantarjian HM, et al. Functional proteomic profiling of AML predicts response and survival. Blood. 2009;113:154–164. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-119438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gudkov AV, Komarova EA. Pathologies associated with the p53 response. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001180. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.