Abstract
Mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers (CRC) display widespread instability at DNA microsatellite sequences (MSI). Although MSI has been reported to commonly occur at coding repeats, leading to alterations in the function of a number of genes encoding cancer-related proteins, nothing is known about the putative impact of this process on non-coding microRNAs. In miRbase V15, we identified very few human microRNA genes with mono- or di-nucleotide repeats (n = 27). A mutational analysis of these sequences in a large series of MSI CRC cell lines and primary tumors underscored instability in 15 of the 24 microRNA genes successfully studied at variable frequencies ranging from 2.5% to 100%. Following a maximum likelihood statistical method, microRNA genes were separated into two groups that differed significantly in their mutation frequencies and in their tendency to represent mutations that may or may not be under selective pressures during MSI tumoral progression. The first group included 21 genes that displayed no or few mutations in CRC. The second group contained three genes, i.e., hsa-mir-1273c, hsa-mir-1303 and hsa-mir-567, with frequent (≥80%) and sometimes bi-allelic mutations in MSI tumors. For the only one expressed in colonic tissues, hsa-mir-1303, no direct link was found between the presence or not of mono- or bi-allelic alterations and the levels of mature miR expression in MSI cell lines, as determined by sequencing and quantitative PCR respectively. Overall, our results provide evidence that DNA repeats contained in human miRNA genes are relatively rare and preserved from mutations due to MSI in MMR-deficient cancer cells. Functional studies are now required to conclude whether mutated miRNAs, and especially the miR-1303, might have a role in MSI tumorigenesis.
Introduction
During the last decade, microRNA (miRNA) genes have been extensively identified in mammals, plants and viruses. They encode short (∼22 nucleotides) single-stranded mature RNA molecules (miRs) that regulate gene expression mostly by base pairing with the 3′ UTR of target mRNA [1], [2]. In humans, it is estimated that more than one thousand miRs control the expression of about 60% of protein-coding genes. Numerous functional studies have reported the participation of miRs in various cellular processes, and subsequently, their deregulation in a number of human diseases including cancer [2], [3]. MiRNA genes can be located within introns and less frequently within exons, or intergenic regions, their expression being regulated by independent or host gene promoters [4]. Excepting miRNA genes arising entirely from the spliced out introns of host's mRNA (named mirtrons [5]), each microRNA gene produces three types of molecules that will undergo successive cleavages by two RNAses, called Drosha and Dicer, to yield the fully functional miR: a large primary transcript (pri-miR, ∼500 to 3000 bases), a hairpin-like intermediate precursor (pre-miR, ∼60 to 80 bases), and a transient miRNA duplex from which two different mature miRs are usually produced at different (major miR/minor miR*) or equivalent (miR-5p/miR-3p) amounts [5], [6]. Each maturation step relies heavily on crucial structural features that dictate a correct and reliable biogenesis of the mature miRNA. Both size and sequence variations in various regions of the miRNA hairpin (basal segment, stem, miRNA duplex and loop) can cause dysregulation of miR biogenesis and are believed to have tumorigenic consequences [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].
Several genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that lead to the alteration of miR expression and function have been described in human tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC) [13], [14], [15]. A methylation of miRNA-34b/c CpG islands, for instance, has been frequently observed in CRC cell lines and primary tumors [16], and an increased expression of miR-17-92 cluster has been noted in conjunction with a chromosomal instability (CIN) at the chromosome band 13q31 containing this miRNA locus [17]. Importantly, CIN also called MSS (microsatellite stability) characterizes the main subset of CRC (representing 80–85% of all CRCs). Microsatellite instability (MSI), on the other hand, a particularity resulting from a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, has been reported in the remaining 15–20% of CRCs [18]. In MSI CRC, which usually does not display CIN, tumor progression is thought to result notably from the accumulation of secondary mutational events (deletion/insertion) affecting microsatellites, repeated sequences of short DNA motifs (1–6 bp), contained in cancer-related genes [19], [20]. These mutations affect target genes involved in various biological pathways such as the regulation of cell cycle and/or cell proliferation (TGFBR2, IGF2R, TCF4, AXIN2, PTEN, RIZ…), the regulation of apoptosis (BAX, CASP5, BCL10, APAF1, FAS…), or the DNA damage signalling and repair pathways (RAD50, BLM, MSH3, MSH6, MBD4, MLH3, CHK1, ATR…). In the majority of target genes, frame-shift mutations were observed in exonic repeats, most often mononucleotide tracts, leading to the production of truncated proteins. More rarely, somatic mutations in intronic mononucleotide repeats of MSI target genes (MRE11 and HSP110) were shown to lead to aberrant splicing and to the generation of altered proteins [21], [22].
In this study, we investigated for the first time whether miRNA genes, regardless of their genomic location, might constitute new targets of MSI in CRC. All human miRNA genes containing mononucleotide (MNR) or dinucleotide repeats (DNR) (≥7 repeats) in their hairpin sequences were screened for mutations (nucleotides additions/deletions) using a large series of MMR-deficient CRC cell lines and primary tumors, as well as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LBLs) and MSS CRC controls enabling the assessment of the polymorphic status of these sequences.
Results
Screening for microsatellite repeats in miRNA hairpins and determination of their polymorphism in MMR-proficient cell lines
Amongst the 940 human miRNA sequences listed in miRbase V15, 24 contain MNR with at least seven repeat units (2.5%) (Table 1). DNR (≥7 repeats) are more rarely found in miRNA sequences (3/940, 0.3%) (Table 1). These miRNA genes are distributed on several chromosomes. The majority is found in protein-coding genes (22/27, 81.5%), mostly within intronic sequences (21/22, 95.5%). Repeated sequences vary in size and can reach up to 18 repeats. More than two-thirds of MNR (17/24; 71%) are small (7 to 8 bp) and A/T rich (16/24; 67%). They span many regions of the hairpin precursor (Figure 1) considered important for miR maturation and/or function. These regions consist of the basal segments, the stem, the miRNA duplex and the terminal loop [7], [8], [9], [10]. Two miRNAs (hsa-mir-511-1 and hsa-mir-511-2) are duplicates of the same gene and display a unique sequence indistinguishable in our analysis. Except hsa-mir-1234 and hsa-mir-3166, all miRNA genes were successfully amplified using a set of fluorescent primers bordering the hairpin sequence. MiRNA genes were first analyzed in healthy individuals (LBLs, n = 40) for an evaluation of the inherent polymorphism (Table 2). Out of 21 MNR analyzed in normal DNA samples, the majority (17 genes) was shown to be monomorphic (Table 2). Length polymorphism (1 bp shift) in hsa-mir-1303 was observed with the smaller allele having the highest allelic frequency (Table S1, Figure S1). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs33982250 and rs34889453, both corresponding to an Adenine deletion, are reported for hsa-mir-1303 and are located outside the MNR [23]. Rare alleles with up to 3-bp shifts were also identified in hsa-mir-511, hsa-mir-543 and hsa-mir-1302-7 genes (Table S1, Figure S1). Similar results were obtained in a series of 25 primary MSS colorectal tumors and 13 MSS CRC cell lines (Table S1).
Table 1. Intergenic and intragenic microRNA genes containing MNR or DNR.
miRNA gene | Chromosomic location | Genomic location | Repeat size |
hsa-mir-1302-7 | 8q24.3 | IG | A7 |
hsa-mir-511-1 | 10p12.33 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-511-2 | 10p12.33 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-543 | 14q32.31 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-548f-3 | 5q22.1 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-548f-5 | Xp21.1 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-548u | 6p11.2 | I | T7 |
hsa-mir-3166 | 11q14.2 | IG | T7 |
hsa-mir-328 | 16q22.1 | I | G7 |
hsa-mir-1225 | 16p13.3 | I* | G7 |
hsa-mir-4271 | 3p21.31 | E | G7 |
hsa-mir-92b | 1q22 | I | C7 |
hsa-mir-152 | 17q21.32 | I | C7 |
hsa-mir-296 | 20q13.32 | I | C7 |
hsa-mir-1249 | 22q13.31 | I | C7 |
hsa-mir-320c-1 | 18q11.2 | I | A8 |
hsa-mir-525 | 19q13.42 | IG | A8 |
hsa-mir-320b-2 | 1q42.11 | I | A9 |
hsa-mir-644 | 20q11.22 | I | T9 |
hsa-mir-4329 | Xq23 | IG | T9 |
hsa-mir-1273c | 6q25.2 | I | T11 |
hsa-mir-567 | 3q13.2 | I | A13 |
hsa-mir-1303 | 5q33.2 | IG | T13 |
hsa-mir-1234 | 8q24.3 | I* | G18 |
hsa-mir-1277 | Xq24 | I | (AU)7 |
hsa-mir-620 | 2q24.21 | I | (UA)11 |
hsa-mir-558 | 12p22.3 | I | (GU)18 |
IG, intergenic; I, intronic; I*, mirtron (miRNAs from small intronic sequences); E, exonic.
Table 2. Polymorphism and somatic mutation frequency of microsatellite repeats in miRNA genes.
CRC cell lines | Colorectal primary tumors | |||||||
miRNA gene | LBL (%) | Polymorphism | MSS (%) | MSI (%) | P value | MSS (%) | MSI (%) | P value |
MNR | ||||||||
hsa-mir-1302-7 | 1/33 (3%)a | yes | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%)b | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 1/36 (2.8%)b | NS |
hsa-mir-511 | 3/40 (7.5%)a | yes | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%)b | NS | 0/23 (0%) | 0/36 (0%)b | NS |
hsa-mir-543 | 6/35 (17.1%)a | yes | 0/13 (0%) | 1/14 (7%)b | NS | 0/25 (0%) | 2/39 (5%)b | NS |
hsa-mir-548f-3 | 0/36 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/23 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-548f-5 | 0/38 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 1/40 (2.5%) | NS |
hsa-mir-548u | 0/32 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/12 (0%) | NS | 0/23 (0%) | 0/39 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-328 | 0/34 (0%) | no | 0/12 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/22 (0%) | 0/40 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-1225 | 0/37 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | NS | 1/22 (4,6%) | 0/33 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-4271 | 0/33 (0%) | no | 0/10 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | NS | 0/23 (0%) | 1/38 (2.6%) | NS |
hsa-mir-92b | 0/38 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 0/40 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-152 | 0/40 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/20 (0%) | 0/37 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-296 | 0/36 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-1249 | 0/23 (0%) | no | 1/13 (7.7%) | 0/13 (0%) | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 2/39 (5%) | NS |
hsa-mir-320c-1 | 0/38 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/23 (0%) | 1/38 (2.6%) | NS |
hsa-mir-525 | 0/38 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 2/14 (14.3%) | NS | 0/21 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | NS |
hsa-mir-320b-2 | 0/37 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 1/14 (7.1%) | NS | 0/24 (0%) | 3/40 (7.5%) | NS |
hsa-mir-644 | 0/40 (0%) | no | 0/12 (0%) | 6/14 (42.9%) | 0.03 | 0/23 (0%) | 8/39 (20.5%) | 0.053 |
hsa-mir-4329 | 0/40 (0%) | no | 2/12 (16.7%) | 0/13 (0%) | NS | 0/22 (0%) | 6/38 (15.8%) | NS |
hsa-mir-1273c | 0/32 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 9/11 (82%) | <0.0001 | 0/25 (0%) | 33/39 (84.6%) | <0.0001 |
hsa-mir-567 | 0/39 (0%) | no | 0/12 (0%) | 14/14 (100%) | <0.0001 | 2/25 (8%) | 31/39 (79.5%) | <0.0001 |
hsa-mir-1303 | 20/39 (51%)a | yes | 0/13 (0%) | 12/14 (85.7%)b | <0.0001 | 0/23 (0%) | 33/40 (82.5%)b | <0.0001 |
DNR | ||||||||
hsa-mir-1277 | 0/40 (0%) | no | 0/13 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | NS | 0/25 (0%) | 1/41 (2.4%) | NS |
hsa-mir-620 | 32/40 (80%)a | yes | 0/13 (0%) | 1/14 (7%)b | NS | 0/21 (0%) | 1/38 (2.6%)b | NS |
hsa-mir-558 | 35/40 (87.5%)a | yes | 0/12 (0%) | 4/13 (30.8%)b | 0.095 | 0/24 (0%) | 12/38 (31.6%)b | 0.006 |
MiRNA genes with DNR appeared to be highly polymorphic (Table 2). Two of 3 genes displayed several alleles with important length variations: 6 and 15 alleles found respectively for hsa-mir-620 and hsa-mir-558 in healthy individuals (Table S1, Figure S1). Here, length polymorphisms have been reported to be localized within the microsatellite repeats [23].
Mutation analysis of miRNA genes with MNR and DNR
The instability of all miRNA repeats was investigated in a series of 41 primary MSI CRCs and 14 MSI CRC cell lines (Table 2). Primary MSS CRCs (n = 25) and MSS CRC cell lines (n = 13) are used as controls. With very few exceptions, the MSS controls did not show size alterations in any of the miRNA repeats (3/557 and 3/304 mutational events in primary tumors and cell lines, respectively), while 135/913 and 50/326 mutational events were observed in MSI primary tumors (p = 2.2×10−16) and cell lines (p = 2.28×10−10), respectively. Analysis of DNR showed that 2 miRNAs with 7 (hsa-mir-1277) and 11 repeats (hsa-mir-620) were unaltered in MSI samples. Hsa-mir-558 with 18 repeats appeared mutated in one third of MSI cell lines (4/13; 30.8%) and MSI CRCs (12/38; 31.6%) (Table 2).
Statistical studies were performed on miRNAs with MNR because of their largest number (n = 21). Based on the data reported in Table 2, we show that the majority of miRNA genes are rarely (3/21 with mutation rate ≤15%) or not altered (14/21, 66%) in MSI CRC cell lines, while very few genes (4/21; 19%) are found to be significantly mutated. Similar results were obtained in MSI CRCs (Table 2). However, alterations were less frequently encountered in MSI tumors compared to cell lines, an observation in accordance with what is reported for genes with coding MNRs [24]. Additionally, we noted a significant correlation between the size of miRNA MNRs and the mutation frequency in MSI tumors (p<0.001, r = 0.76) (Figure 2). This correlation was already observed for many microsatellite sequences independently of their genomic localizations (intergenic, coding/exonic, coding/5′ 3′ untranslated and intronic MNRs) (Figure S2).
miRNA genes with MNR segregate into different groups
Using a maximum likelihood statistical method as previously described (refer to Materials and Methods and [24]), we identified two distinct groups of miRNA genes containing MNR that differed in their mutability in MSI primary tumors (Figure 3). Briefly, the test considers that all genes belong to one group of frequency and opposes to this configuration the alternative hypothesis of two mutually exclusive groups of frequencies. The likelihood ratio calculates the chances of each hypothesis and gives the most “likely” to occur. The first, largest group comprises miRNA genes found to be not or not much mutated in MSI tumors (18/21; 86%). The second group contained 3 miRNA genes (hsa-mir-1273c, hsa-mir-567 and hsa-mir-1303) frequently mutated in MSI CRCs (≥75%). Similar groups were defined in MSI CRC cell lines (Figure S3).
Characterization of alterations and their impact on mature miRNA expression
Our analysis allowed the identification of 3 MSI-targeted miRNAs: hsa-mir-1273c, hsa-mir-567 and hsa-mir-1303. For these genes, the great majority of MSI cell lines presented up to 3 bp deletions (Figure 4, Table S2), and rarely a nucleotide addition (Table S2). A bi-allelic mutation was also noted in 36%, 57% and 83% of altered MSI CRC cell lines for mir-1273c, mir-567 or mir-1303, respectively (Figure 4, Table S2). Similar alterations were found in MSI primary tumors with the exception of hsa-mir-1273c, which generally displayed smaller levels of alterations in tumors (only 1 bp-deletion) (Figure 4, Table S2). Concerning the polymorphic hsa-mir-1303 gene, whose major allele displays an A-deletion (Table S1), the hairpin precursor was sequenced in each MSI CRC cell line to determine the real extent of the deletion. Like LBL and MSS cell lines (Table S1), MSI cell lines appeared to be homozygous (50%; delA/delA) or heterozygous (50%, delA/A) for the “delA” allele. The relevance of the “delA” SNP in hsa-mir-1303 is shown in Figure 5A that illustrates changes in the terminal loop of the mir-1303 hairpin structures. The dimension of the loop containing the microsatellite decreases when the alterations get bigger and whenever the hairpin structure contains the A-addition SNP (Figure 5A).
Based on these results, we hypothesized that nucleotide deletions encountered in miRNA precursors might affect the biogenesis of mature miRs, modifying their levels of expression and/or their sequence as reported for some other miRNA genes [7], [8], [9], [10]. Using specific quantitative RT-PCR technologies, we determined the relative expression of each mature miR in wild-type (WT) and mutated CRC cell lines in comparison to expression in healthy colonic mucosae. Expression of miR-567 and miR-1273c was not detectable in colonic mucosae and colorectal cell lines (CT>36 cycles) (data not shown); whereas miR-1303 appeared to be fairly expressed in both normal and tumor colonic cells (Figure 5B). Taking into account the level of instability, miR-1303 expression was first analysed in MSI CRC cell lines. With normal colonic mucosae serving as controls, no difference in miR-1303 expression was noted between unaltered hsa-mir-1303 MSI cell lines and the heterozygously mutated MSI cell lines (Figure 5B). An increase in the expression of miR-1303 expression was nevertheless observed in some of the MSI cell lines mutated on both alleles (Figure 5B). Furthermore, cell lines supposed to have identical structures of miRNA hairpins (Figure 5C), did not show comparable expression levels. It seems, therefore, as long as the size of the loop does not correlate to the levels of expression, that MSI alterations have no repercussion on mature miR expression. A significant increase of miR-1303 observed in MSS CRC cell lines in comparison to normal colonic mucosa supported this result (Figure 5B).
Discussion
To date, the only established indirect impact of MSI process on miRNA biogenesis is the targeting and therefore disruption of protein coding genes involved in miRNA processing and transport [25], [26], [27], [28]. Our study is the first reporting somatic mutations in miRNA genes due to MSI in MMR-deficient CRCs. By screening the quasi totality of MNR and DNR (≥7 repeat units) contained in miRbase-V15-annotated miRNA hairpin sequences, hsa-mir-1273c, hsa-mir-1303 and hsa-mir-567 were demonstrated to be mutated at high frequency in both CRC cell lines and primary tumors. Since high mutation frequency is the first criterion currently taken into consideration to identify target genes that play a role in the MSI-driven pathway to cancer [19], [20], [29], [30], these miRNA genes may thus constitute real target for MSI. In contrast, all other miRNA alterations we identified are likely to be the result of the background of genetic instability characterizing these tumors. They were found to be affected at low frequency and may play only a minor role in colon tumorigenesis, if any. Besides, some miRNA genes containing microsatellite were found to be never mutated in CRC cell lines and primary tumours. They might be considered as ‘survivor’ miRNA genes whose mutations are not selected for during tumor progression since they could be highly deleterious for cancer cells [19].
MSI is also influenced by sequence criteria, e.g. the length of the repeat. Expectedly, we observed an overall positive correlation between the length of miRNA repeats and their mutation rates in MSI CRC, corroborating the observation made for coding and non-coding MNR. As required for protein coding genes [29], [30], functional criteria are necessary to assert that MSI-targeted miRNA genes have a role in MSI colon tumorigenesis. MiRNAs are deeply involved in the regulation of gene expression, being therefore associated with various biological processes. No biological role has yet been attributed to hsa-mir-1303 that is, amongst these, the only miR that was significantly expressed in the colonic mucosa. Several hundreds of mRNA can be assigned in silico to miR-1303 depending on the software used, and further analyses are necessary to define those whose in vivo expression really depends on hsa-mir-1303. Furthermore, the priority is to prove that MNR alterations due to MSI may impact mir-1303 function. Several teams have already highlighted the major role of the terminal loop within the primary miRNA hairpin in miRNA biogenesis and function [8], [9]. In addition, a single base alteration (i.e. SNP) within the miRNA gene itself (pri-, pre- and mature miRNA sequences) is sometimes sufficient to alter miRNA expression and/or function in cancers, blocking the processing of pri-miRNA to pre-miRNA [23], [31] or, conversely, increasing mature miR expression [32]. We failed here to observe any evident correlation between expression level of mature miR-1303 and mutation in the DNA repeat contained in its terminal loop in MSI CRC cells, regardless of the SNP adjacent to the loop. Further studies using appropriate plasmid constructions will be developed to know whether MNR mutations affecting this miRNA gene could modify the processing of the mature miR-1303 generating different miRs [33] or the function of the pri- or pre-miRNA molecules that are recently reported by Trujillo et al. [34] to be biologically active.
In conclusion, our findings have two main implications for the role of miRNA in MSI-driven carcinogenesis. They first provide evidence that MSI CRCs display only a few somatic mutations affecting a small number of miRNA genes containing DNA repeats with yet unclear consequence on the processing and function of these molecules. Functional studies are now required to enforce the idea that the miR-1303 might have a role in MSI tumorigenesis. Secondly, they show that DNA repeats contained in miRNA genes are relatively rare and usually preserved from mutations due to MSI in MMR-deficient cancer cells. This study focuses on the nucleotide repeats located in the hairpin sequences that contain at least the pre-miRNA, and could be enlarged to MNR located in other regions of miRNA genes important for the transcription and the processing of large primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs).
Materials and Methods
DNA samples
Normal DNA was obtained from 40 healthy individuals (lymphoblastoid cell lines) provided by CEPH (Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain, Paris, France). Primary tumor tissues (41 MSI and 25 MSS tumors) from patients undergoing surgery for CRC at either the Saint-Antoine hospital (Paris, France) or the hospital of Hautepierre (Strasbourg, France) were collected at the Biological Resources Centers of each institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Ethics approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Paris, France) and from the “Comité pour la Protection des Personnes de Strasbourg” (CPPEST IV, Strasbourg, France). The MSI status was determined by fluorescent multiplex PCR, as previously described [35], and allowed the evaluation of the percentage of epithelial carcinoma tissue in MSI samples. Only tumors with at least 40% of tumor material have been included in our study. DNA was extracted from 14 MSI and 13 MSS CRC cell lines using QIAamp DNA mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to manufacturer's instructions.
Identification of mono- and dinucleotide repeats
A systematic screening for mono and dinucleotide repeats was performed in miRbase (version 15, April 2010 release) (http://www.mirbase.org/) [6]. This database provides sequences of miRNA hairpin precursors and mature miRNAs in various species. We selected human miRNAs having at least 7 repeat units. This minimum number was chosen because microsatellites were rarely found to be unstable below 7 repeats (refer to SelTarbase, http://www.seltarbase.org/).
Mutation analysis
Specific primers flanking the hairpin sequences were designed using the Amplifix software for each miRNA candidate. PCR amplification was performed in a final volume of 25 µl with 5 ng of DNA, high or low MgCl2 concentration, with or without Q solution, and Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). Primer sequences are listed in Table S3. The thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 45 sec; 60°C for 60 sec and 72°C for 60 sec. Finnzyme Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) was also used in some cases according to manufacturer's protocol. Adequate dilutions of the fluorescent PCR products were mixed with formamide and GeneScan™ 400HD ROX™ Size Standard (Life Technologies, Courtaboeuf, France), heat-denatured and run on a short capillary containing GS Performance Optimized Polymer 7 on the ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer. Data were visualized and annotated in the GeneMapper 3.7 software (Life Technologies).
Sequencing of hsa-mir-1303 hairpin precursor
A sequence containing the hsa-mir-1303 hairpin precursor was amplified by the Finnzyme Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the following primers: F-GTGAACTAAACGCTGCCTCTGCTA and R-TGCAGGAACCGTACTAAGCACT (Tm = 66°C). PCR products were then purified on 96-well Multiscreen-PCR filtration plats (Millipore, Molsheim, France). Sequencing reaction was carried out using the Big Dye Terminator Kit V3.1 (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol and using separately the forward or reverse primers. Sequences products were then purified on 96-well Multiscreen-DV plates (Millipore) with Sephadex G-50 Fine and analysed on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies)
Reverse-Transcription and Real-Time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was prepared from exponentially grown cells (9 MSS and 14 MSI CRC cells) and normal colonic mucosa from patients with CRC (n = 7) using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) then quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. cDNAs were generated from 10 ng or 100 ng of total RNA using miRNA-specific stem loop RT primers (Life Technologies) for miR-1303 or miR-1273c, respectively. RT-qPCR assays were performed in triplicate on an ABI 7900 Sequence Detection System using the TaqMan MicroRNA assay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies). For the detection of miR-567, the miScript PCR system (miScript RT and miScript SYBR Green PCR kits) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). With both technologies, CT, the cycle number at which the amount of amplified target reaches a fixed threshold, was determined. CT above 36 were considered as false positives. Mature miRNA expression was normalized to that of RNU48 (Life Technologies) or RNU6B (Qiagen) (ΔCT = CTmiR−CTRNU). Comparative quantification was performed using a calibrator sample. Relative miRNA expression was expressed as 2−ΔΔCT (2−(ΔCT sample−ΔCTcalibrator)). The thermal cycling conditions comprised 45 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min (Life Technologies) or 45 cycles at 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s and 70°C for 30 s, preceded by an initial activation step at 95°C for 15 min (Qiagen).
Statistical analyses
The differences between variables were assessed with the Chi-2 or Fisher's exact test, when required. Student t-test was used to evaluate differences in miR expression levels.
As previously described by Duval et al., a ratio of likelihood was calculated to assign each miRNA to a frequency group [24]. With Ni, the number of tumors tested at locus i and ni, the number of tumors unstable at this locus, the H1 alternative hypothesis assumes the presence of two types of loci (ie. miRNA genes) that differ in their mutation frequencies (a “stable” group with a low mutation rate, p1; and an “unstable” group with a high mutation rate, p2. α and 1-α are the proportions of sites with the p1 and p2 instability respectively). Conversely, the H0 null hypothesis assumes that all miRNA genes can be grouped in one frequency class, p0, where no significant differences exist between each miRNA locus. The ratio of likelihood is given by:
This ratio follows a Chi-square distribution with two degrees of freedom.
For all tests, a 95% confidence interval was applied and P<0.05 was considered as significant.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Lina El-Murr for critical reading of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: N El-Murr is a recipient of a LNCC (Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer) fellowship. This work was supported by Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:102–114. doi: 10.1038/nrg2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Melo SA, Esteller M. Dysregulation of microRNAs in cancer: Playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.009. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:259–269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Olena AF, Patton JG. Genomic organization of microRNAs. J Cell Physiol. 2010;222:540–545. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Winter J, Jung S, Keller S, Gregory RI, Diederichs S. Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:228–234. doi: 10.1038/ncb0309-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ. miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D154–158. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zeng Y, Cullen BR. Efficient processing of primary microRNA hairpins by Drosha requires flanking nonstructured RNA sequences. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:27595–27603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504714200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zeng Y, Yi R, Cullen BR. Recognition and cleavage of primary microRNA precursors by the nuclear processing enzyme Drosha. Embo J. 2005;24:138–148. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang X, Zeng Y. The terminal loop region controls microRNA processing by Drosha and Dicer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:7689–7697. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, Nam JW, Heo I, et al. Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell. 2006;125:887–901. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu M, Jolicoeur N, Li Z, Zhang L, Fortin Y, et al. Genetic variations of microRNAs in human cancer and their effects on the expression of miRNAs. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:1710–1716. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:389–402. doi: 10.1038/nrc2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNAs and chromosomal abnormalities in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2006;25:6202–6210. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Breving K, Esquela-Kerscher A. The complexities of microRNA regulation: mirandering around the rules. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;42:1316–1329. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:597–610. doi: 10.1038/nrg2843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Toyota M, Suzuki H, Sasaki Y, Maruyama R, Imai K, et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-34b/c and B-cell translocation gene 4 is associated with CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4123–4132. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Diosdado B, van de Wiel MA, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Mongera S, Postma C, et al. MiR-17–92 cluster is associated with 13q gain and c-myc expression during colorectal adenoma to adenocarcinoma progression. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:707–714. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Boland CR, Goel A. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2073–2087. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duval A, Hamelin R. Mutations at coding repeat sequences in mismatch repair-deficient human cancers: toward a new concept of target genes for instability. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2447–2454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Woerner SM, Benner A, Sutter C, Schiller M, Yuan YP, et al. Pathogenesis of DNA repair-deficient cancers: a statistical meta-analysis of putative Real Common Target genes. Oncogene. 2003;22:2226–2235. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giannini G, Ristori E, Cerignoli F, Rinaldi C, Zani M, et al. Human MRE11 is inactivated in mismatch repair-deficient cancers. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:248–254. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dorard C, de Thonel A, Collura A, Marisa L, Svrcek M, et al. Expression of a mutant HSP110 sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy and improves disease prognosis. Nat Med. 2011;17:1283–1289. doi: 10.1038/nm.2457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duan S, Mi S, Zhang W, Dolan ME. Comprehensive analysis of the impact of SNPs and CNVs on human microRNAs and their regulatory genes. RNA Biol. 2009;6:412–425. doi: 10.4161/rna.6.4.8830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duval A, Rolland S, Compoint A, Tubacher E, Iacopetta B, et al. Evolution of instability at coding and non-coding repeat sequences in human MSI-H colorectal cancers. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:513–518. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.5.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Melo SA, Ropero S, Moutinho C, Aaltonen LA, Yamamoto H, et al. A TARBP2 mutation in human cancer impairs microRNA processing and DICER1 function. Nat Genet. 2009;41:365–370. doi: 10.1038/ng.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 26.Melo SA, Moutinho C, Ropero S, Calin GA, Rossi S, et al. A genetic defect in exportin-5 traps precursor microRNAs in the nucleus of cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:303–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Garre P, Perez-Segura P, Diaz-Rubio E, Caldes T, de la Hoya M. Reassessing the TARBP2 mutation rate in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2010;42:817–818. doi: 10.1038/ng1010-817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim MS, Oh JE, Kim YR, Park SW, Kang MR, et al. Somatic mutations and losses of expression of microRNA regulation-related genes AGO2 and TNRC6A in gastric and colorectal cancers. J Pathol. 2010;221:139–146. doi: 10.1002/path.2683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:5248–5257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perucho M. Correspondence re: C.R. Boland et al., A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1999;58:5248–5257, 1998. Cancer Res 59: 249–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duan R, Pak C, Jin P. Single nucleotide polymorphism associated with mature miR-125a alters the processing of pri-miRNA. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:1124–1131. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T, Zhou X, Gu H, et al. Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non-small cell lung cancer survival. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2600–2608. doi: 10.1172/JCI34934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jazdzewski K, Liyanarachchi S, Swierniak M, Pachucki J, Ringel MD, et al. Polymorphic mature microRNAs from passenger strand of pre-miR-146a contribute to thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1502–1505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812591106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Trujillo RD, Yue SB, Tang Y, O'Gorman WE, Chen CZ. The potential functions of primary microRNAs in target recognition and repression. Embo J. 2010;29:3272–3285. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Buhard O, Cattaneo F, Wong YF, Yim SF, Friedman E, et al. Multipopulation analysis of polymorphisms in five mononucleotide repeats used to determine the microsatellite instability status of human tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:241–251. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.