Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2010 Dec;5(4):42–47.

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium Infection in Immunocompromised Patients, In South-West of Iran, 2009–10

A Balouty Dehkordy 1, A Rafiei 1,2,*, SM Alavi 2, SM Latifi 3
PMCID: PMC3279856  PMID: 22347265

Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite with worldwide distribution. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection by antigen detection in faeces among immunocompromised patients referred to educational hospitals of Ahvaz City, South-West of Iran, 2009–2010.

Methods

Fecal samples from 176 immunocompromised patients were collected and Cryptosporidium coproantigen test was performed using ELISA method (DRG kit, Germany). A questionnaire was completed for each case and the results were analyzed using descriptive and Chi-Square tests, by SPSS statistical software (15th version).

Results

Our study indicated 5.1% Cryptosporidium infection prevalence in the immunocompromised participated population. Furthermore, 4.2 %, 4 %, 4.5 % and 9.1 % infection rates were identified in children suffered from hematopoietic malignancy, adult cancer patients, renal transplant recipients, and HIV+ cases, respectively. There was not significant correlation between the infection and age and gender (P>0.05). Infection was most frequent among HIV+ patients.

Conclusion

The present study confirmed the high prevalence of Cryptosporidium antigen in fecal samples of immunocompromised patients in the region. As no chemotherapeutic agents have yet proven, especially in immunosuppressed patients, therefore our results highlight the importance of preventive intervention in these groups.

Keywords: Cryptosporidium, Coproantigen, Immunocompromised patients, ELISA, human, Iran

Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is caused by Cryptosporidium strains, a parasite classified as emerging pathogens. The organism infects the gastrointestinal epithelium to produce a diarrhea that is self-limited in immunocompetent persons, but potentially life threating in immunocompromised persons (1). Furthermore, Cryptosporidium stated an organism with low infective dose and resistant to conventional water disinfectants (2). In addition, no definitive treatment and proven protocol has been achieved for cryptosporidiosis (3). Therefore, prevention seems to be the main effective disease protection, especially among immuno-compromised individuals.

Immunocompromised patients such as HIV+ patients with malignant disease, post-transplant patients and children under 5 years old, are at high risk to develop diarrheal disease caused by Cryptosporidium.

Because of the lack of updated data, this study was conducted to estimate Cryptosporidium prevalence in immunocompromised patients, in south-west of Iran.

Materials and Methods

This cross sectional study was performed among immunocompromised patients referred to educational hospitals of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences during 2009–2010.

Overall, 176 patients including 48 children with lymphohematopoietic malignancies and 50 adults with malignancies, admitted to Hematology Department of Shafa Hospital and underwent chemotherapy were included in the study. Fifty-five renal transplant patients and 33 confirmed HIV+ patients were also participated. The patients were interviewed and a questionnaire was completed for demographical, hygienic, and environmental life style. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

A total 176 stool samples were collected and stored at −20°C without any preservative until used. The ELISA, DRG diagnostic kits (EIA-3467, Germany) was used for Cryptosporidium antigen detection in stool samples. The samples were defrosted and enzyme immunoassay was performed as described by the manufacturer. The results were carried out spectrophotometrically at 450 nm using Dynatech ELISA reader. According to manufacturer guideline, the specimen was considered positive if optical density was more than 0.15.

Statistical analysis was conducted with Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 15th.

Results

Among 176 immunocompromised patients, 9 (5.1%) cases were positive for Cryptosporidium antigen. Of these, 2 and 7 cases were among 1–15 and 16–75 year old group, respectively. No significant correlation between Cryptosporidium infection frequency, age, and gender was obtained (Table 1, 2). Frequency of Cryptosporidium infection was 9.1%, 4%, 4.2% and 4.5 % among HIV+, adults with malignancies, children suffered from lymphohematopoietic malignancy and renal transplant patients, respectively (Table 3).

Table 1.

Frequency of Cryptosporidium infection in immunocompromised patients according to gender

ELISA Positive Negative Total

Gender No. % No. % No. %
Male 7 5.8 113 94.2 120 100
Female 2 3.6 54 96.4 56 100

Table 2.

Frequency of Cryptosporidium infection in immunocompromised patients according to age

ELISA Positive Negative Total

Age (year) No. % No. % No. %
1–15 2 4.2 46 95.8 48 100
16–76 7 5.5 121 94.5 128 100

Table 3.

Frequency of Cryptosporidium infection according to type of immunosuppressant illness

ELISA Negative Positive Total

Illness No. % No. % No. %
Children Malignancy 46 95.8 2 4.2 48 100
Adult Malignancy 48 96 2 4 50 100
Kidney Recipients 43 95.5 2 4.5 45 100
HIV+ 30 90.9 3 9.1 33 100
Total 167 94.9 9 5.1 176 100

The freeze/thaw associated instability of Cryptosporidium antigen in nine positive samples was analyzed. Only two stool samples were positive after second freeze-thaw cycle.

Discussion

Cryptosporidiosis is recognized as an important gastroenteritis disorder of immunocompromised patients. In such cases, it may lead to high morbidity and mortality (4). The prevalence of Cryptosporidium antigen in stool examination by ELISA in immunocompromised patients was 5.1%. Similar studies in Iran indicated the prevalence rates of 1.4%, 11.5%, 22%, and 26.7% within immunocompromised patients (58). Higher prevalence rates (17–61.1%) have been reported in India and Turkey, among immunocompromised patients with diarrhea (912). There are discrepancies in prevalence rates of Cryptosporidium sp. in Iran and other countries (13). Probably different situation of hygienic life styles and living environmental are responsible for these variable levels of infection.

There was only one infected case with diarrhea in our study. As this parasite has been recognized to cause sever life-threatening disorder, even in non-diarrheic immunocompromised patients, therefore the reliable technique for demonstration of oocysts in stool examination of such patients is necessary.

In this study, infection was most frequent among HIV+ cases. Higher rate of infection in HIV+ patients have been reported ranged from 8.7% to 26.7% in Iran and 0% to 100% in other countries (4, 8, 14, 15). This finding may be because HIV+ patients suffered from immunological disturbances predominantly from cellular immunoresponce of T helper 1 cell. On the other hand, in our study the most cases had addiction and were in low socioeconomic level, besides, they did not use safe and hygienic drinking water.

In the current study, Cryptosporidium prevalence was 4.5% in renal transplant patients. Different rates of infection from 2.4%, 4.5% and 11.5% have been reported from Iranian communities (6, 16, 17). In some other countries, 18.8% and 20% rates of infection have been indicated (18, 19). Renal transplant patients in our study were under cyclosporine A treatment. Cyclosporine A as an immunosuppressive treatment also acts as an antiparasite agent, therefore it seems this situation could result to reduce infection rate of Cryptosporidium (20). Furthermore, in our study transplant patients used hygienic water as advised by health centers. Current study indicated Cryptosporidium infection rate of 4.2% and 4% in children with hematopoeitic and adult cancer patients, respectively. Higher rate of infection have been reported by others (7, 2123).

Analysis of Cryptosporidium antigen viability in feces suggests the possibility that some samples may become negative in ELISA after second freeze/thaw process. Similar results have been reported for other parasite infections (24). These data suggest that fresh sample should be used; if not possible, a careful of sample handling must be performed.

The present study confirmed the high prevalence of Cryptosporidium antigen in fecal samples of immunocompromised patients in the region. As no chemotherapeutic agents have yet proven, especially in immunosuppressed patients, therefore our results highlight the importance of preventive intervention in these groups.

ELISA showed high sensitivity and specificity with reliable results for Cryptosporidium antigen detection in stool (25). In addition cryptosporial antigens may be present in stool without existence the whole oocysts (26), therefore its application in routine diagnosis and even large-scale epidemiological surveys is recommended.

Acknowledgements

We thank the hospital staff and patients, who participated in the survey undertaken. We acknowledge the Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran for their financial support. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Gerald DS, Larry SR. Foundations of parasitology. 7th. Mc Graw Hill Companies; 2006. pp. 141–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Havelar A, Boonyakarnkul T, Cunliffe D, et al. Guidelines for drinking water qulity, water born pathogens. Geneva: WHO; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abubakar I, Aliyu SH, Arumugam C, Usman NK, Hunter PR. Treatment of cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised individuals: systemic review and meta analysis. Br J Clin Phamacol. 2007;63(4):387–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02873.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paul RH, Gordon N. Epidemiology and clinical features of Cryptosporidium infection in immunocompromise patients. Clin Mic Reviews. 2002;15(1):145–54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.145-154.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nahrevanian H, Assmar M. Cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised patients in the Islamic Republic of Iran. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008;41:74–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hazrati Tappeh KH, Gharavi MJ, Mkhdoumi K, Rahbar M, Taghizadeh H. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp. infection in renal transplant and heamodialysis Iranian patients. Iranian J Publ Health. 2006;35(3):54–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berenji F, Zabolinejad N, Kianifar HR, Badeii Z, Banihashem A, Hiradfar S. Cryptosporidium infection in pediatric patients with lymphohematopoietic malignancies. Iran J Ped. 2007;17(3):247–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taherkhani H, Fallah M, Jadidian K, Vaziri S. A study on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in HIV positive patients. J Res Health Sci. 2007;7(2):20–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ballal M, Prabhu T, Chadran A, Shivananda P. Cryptosporidium and Isospora belli diarrhea in immunocompromised hosts. Indiana J Cancer. 1999;36(1):38–42. Mar. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ramakrishnun K, Rajaiah Shenbarathai S, Uma A. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestation in HIV/AIDS patients with diarrhea in Madurai City, South India. Jpn J Infect Di. 2007;60(4):209–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tany M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp in patients with neoplasia and diarrhea. Sand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(1):69–70. doi: 10.3109/00365549509018975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arikan S, Ergn, Aky Y, Glp A. Cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised patients in a Turkish university hospitals. Acta Microbial Immuno Hung. 1999;46(1):33–40. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.46.1999.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mirzaei M. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp infection in diarrheic humans in Iran. Kor J Parasitol. 2007;45(2):133–37. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2007.45.2.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meamar AR, Rezaian M, Mohraz M, Zahabiun F, Hadighi R, Kia EB. A comparative analysis of intestinal parasitic infection between HIV+/AIDS patients and non infected individuals. Indian J Parasitol. 2007;2(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nahrvanian H, Assmar M. A case report of cryptosporidiosis and isosporidiasis in AIDS patients in Iran. J Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;29:33–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nateghi Rostami M, Keshavarz H, Eskandari E, Kia EB, Rezaeian M. Intestinal parasitic infections in renal transplant recipients. Iranian J Parasitol. 2007;2(3):16–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Valar C, Keitel E, Dal Pra Rl, Gnatta D, Santos AF. Parasitic infection in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:460–2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ok UZ, Cirit M, Uner A, Akcicek F, Basic A, Ozcel MA. Cryptosporidiosis and blastocystosis in renal transplant recipients. Nephron. 1997;75:171–74. doi: 10.1159/000189527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Minz M, Udgiri NK, Heer MK, Kashyap R. Cryptosporidiosis in live related renal transplant recipients: A single center experience. Transplant. 2004;77:1916–17. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000132341.99938.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chappell LH, Wastling JM. Cyclosporin A: antiparasite drug modulator of the host parasite relationship and immunosuppressant. Parasitol. 1992;105:25–40. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000075338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hassan SI, Sabry H, Amer NM, Shalaby M A, Mohamed NA, Gaballah H. Incidence of cryptosporidiosis in immunodeficient cancer patients in Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2002;32(1):33–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rivera WL, Yason J A, Riveran PT. Serological detection of cryptosporidiosis among Filipino cancer patients. Parasitol Res. 2005;98(1):75–76. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baqai R, Anwar S, Kazmi SU. Detection of Cryptosporidium in immunosuppressed patients. J Ayub Col Abbottabad. 2005;17(3):38–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barbieri M, Server MA, Pirez MI, Battiston J, Nietto A. Use of specific antibody and circulating antigen serum levels in the hydatid immunodiagnosis of asymptomatic population. Inter J Parasitol. 1994;24(7):937–42. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jayalakshmi J, Appalaraju B, Mahadevan K. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of Cryptosporidium antigen in fecal specimens of HIV/AIDS patients. Indian J Pat Microb. 2008;51(1):137–38. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.40427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ungar BL. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of Cryptosporidium antigens in fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2491–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2491-2495.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES