Skip to main content
The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology : Official Journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology logoLink to The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology : Official Journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology
. 2011 Dec 27;15(6):415–422. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2011.15.6.415

Spontaneous Oscillatory Rhythm in Retinal Activities of Two Retinal Degeneration (rd1 and rd10) Mice

Yong Sook Goo 1,, Kun No Ahn 1, Yeong Jun Song 1, Su Heok Ahn 2, Seung Kee Han 2, Sang Baek Ryu 3, Kyung Hwan Kim 3
PMCID: PMC3282230  PMID: 22359480

Abstract

Previously, we reported that besides retinal ganglion cell (RGC) spike, there is ~ 10 Hz oscillatory rhythmic activity in local field potential (LFP) in retinal degeneration model, rd1 mice. The more recently identified rd10 mice have a later onset and slower rate of photoreceptor degeneration than the rd1 mice, providing more therapeutic potential. In this study, before adapting rd10 mice as a new animal model for our electrical stimulation study, we investigated electrical characteristics of rd10 mice. From the raw waveform of recording using 8×8 microelectrode array (MEA) from in vitro-whole mount retina, RGC spikes and LFP were isolated by using different filter setting. Fourier transform was performed for detection of frequency of bursting RGC spikes and oscillatory field potential (OFP). In rd1 mice, ~10 Hz rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is always phase-locked with the OFP and this phase-locking property is preserved regardless of postnatal ages. However, in rd10 mice, there is a strong phase-locking tendency between the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes (~5 Hz) and the first peak of OFP (~5 Hz) across different age groups. But this phase-locking property is not robust as in rd1 retina, but maintains for a few seconds. Since rd1 and rd10 retina show phase-locking property at different frequency (~10 Hz vs. ~5 Hz), we expect different response patterns to electrical stimulus between rd1 and rd10 retina. Therefore, to extract optimal stimulation parameters in rd10 retina, first we might define selection criteria for responding rd10 ganglion cells to electrical stimulus.

Keywords: Oscillatory rhythmic activity, Retinal ganglion cell spike, Local field potential, rd1 mice, rd10 mice

INTRODUCTION

Retinal prostheses are being developed to restore vision for the blind with retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [1-3]. While the retinal degenerations result in photoreceptor loss, significant numbers of bipolar and ganglion cells remain for many years. The preservation of the remaining neural network in patients with RP and AMD provides the opportunity to restore vision by means of an electronic retinal prosthesis.

Among the many animal models of RP, the most extensively characterized animal is the rd1 (formerly rd: abbreviated from retinal degeneration, now Pde6brd1) mouse, first described as a rodless phenotype [4]. Rd1 mouse carries a spontaneous non-sense mutation of the β-subunit of the rod-phosphodiesterase (PDE) gene, causing the massive death of rods in the first weeks of postnatal life. Cones eventually die as well as in typical RP [5,6]. The more recently identified Pde6brd10 (rd10) mouse, which carries a mis-sense mutation in the same gene, has a later onset and slower rate of photoreceptor degeneration than the rd1 mouse [7]. The slower degenerative time course makes rd10 a more appropriate model of human RP, and presents a broader window of opportunity to test therapies for photoreceptor rescue [8-11].

In recent studies including ours using rd1 mice, it is known that the neurophysiological properties of photoreceptor-degenerated retinas differ significantly from those of normal retina [12-17]. The most significant alteration of spontaneous activities of retinal networks in rd1 mice is the presence of an oscillatory rhythmic activity with ~10 Hz frequency [12,13,16]. In our previous study, we showed that the rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is phase-locked with the oscillatory field potential [16].

While some electrophysiological studies including ours have been done with rd1 mice, however, only few studies have been done regarding electrical characteristics of retinal waveform in rd10 mice, and most of them are focused on in vivo ERG study [18,19]. Therefore, here, we investigate the electrical characteristics of retinal waveform using microelectrode array (MEA).

High frequency oscillations (20 to 120 Hz), those generated by the internal dynamics of the system, have been found at all stages of visual processing, from the retina to the cortex [20]. However, ~10 Hz oscillatory rhythmic activity in adult retina has hardly been reported. Even if there is debate about the role of oscillatory rhythmic activity, other than spike rate it is one way of neural code of retina to communicate with the brain.

Therefore, before adapting rd10 mice as a new animal model for our electrical stimulation study for retinal prosthesis, we investigated electrical characteristics of rd10 mice. In this study, we mainly focused on whether there is oscillatory rhythm in bursting RGC spikes and field potential and whether the bursting spikes of RGC is phaselocked with the oscillatory rhythm of local field potential (LFP) in rd10 mice. Since in rd1 mice LFP shows age dependent occurrence [12], we followed the oscillatory rhythm change from postnatal 4 weeks up to 30 weeks even after the complete histological loss of photoreceptor layer is seen in rd10 mice. Also, we compared the oscillatory rhythm in RGC spikes and field potential in two photoreceptor degeneration mice; rd1 and rd10 mice to understand the neural code used by the two diseased retinas to communicate with the brain. This understanding will facilitate to set new selection criteria for responsiveness to electrical stimulus in rd10 mice and rd10-specific optimal electrical stimulation parameters like we already proposed in rd1 mice [17], eventually. Some of the preliminary results has been reported in Goo et al as a conference proceeding [21].

METHODS

In vitro recording of retinal activity

Wild-type (C57BL/6J strain), rd1 (C3H/HeJ strain), rd10 (B6.CXB1-Pde6brd10/J) were used for this experiment. Animal use protocols were approved by the institutional animal care committee of Chungbuk National University (approval number: CBNURA-042-0902-1). Postnatal 8 weeks wild-type, 4 weeks and 8 weeks rd1 mice and 4, 8, 10, 15, 20 and 30 weeks rd10 mice were used. The animals were anesthetized with intramuscular injection of 30 mg/kg zolazepam hydroxide (Zoletil 50; Virbac, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and 10 mg/kg zylazine hydroxide (Rumpun; Bayer, Shawnee Mission, KS) sufficient to extinguish forefoot withdrawal reflexes. The retinal patches were prepared following the method of Stett et al. [22]. Briefly, the eyeball was enucleated, and then, the retina was isolated and cut to the patches of ~3×3 mm sizes. The retinal patches were carried out under moderate illumination in an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) solution (124 mM NaCl, 10 mM Glucose, 1.15 mM KH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1.15 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM KCl) bubbled with 95% O2, 5% CO2 with a pH of 7.3~7.4 and a temperature of 32℃ and then mounted onto a planar microelectrode array (MEA). The retinal patches were placed ganglion cell layer down onto the MEA.

Electrode and data recording system

The data acquisition system (MEA60 system; Multi Channel Systems GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) included planar MEA, stimulator (STG1004), amplifier (MEA1060), temperature control units, data acquisition hardware (Mc_Card) and software (Mc_Rack). The MEA contained 64 circular-shaped electrodes in an 8×8 grid layout with electrode diameters of 30µm and inter-electrode distances of 200µm and coated with porous titanium nitride (TiN) to minimize electrical impedance. The four electrodes at the vertices were inactive. Multi-electrode recordings of the retinal activity were obtained from 60 electrode channels with a bandwidth ranging from 10 to 3,000 Hz at a gain of 1,200. The data sampling rate was 25 kHz/channel. From the raw waveform of retinal recording, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) Spikes and LFP were isolated by using 100 Hz high-pass filter and 20 Hz low-pass filter, respectively. No light or electric stimulation was applied for this experiment and the spontaneous retinal activity was recorded.

Data analysis

Stored data were processed off-line by a spike sorting software (Offline Sorter™) to transform the waveforms containing multiunit activities into multiple single unit spike trains. The spontaneous mean firing rate for each recorded cell was computed as the total number of spikes divided by the length of the recording period. Mean±standard error of the mean (SEM) are presented for the mean firing rate. However, given the non-normal distribution of the spontaneous firing rate, also central values were expressed as medians± first and third quartiles and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. For comparisons across multiple age groups in rd10 mice, one way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test were employed.

Since the strength of neural oscillations are defined in frequency domains on the basis of peaks in the power spectrum, Fourier transform estimated by Burg algorithm [23] was performed for detection of the frequency of LFP and oscillatory rhythm of bursting RGC spikes with Matlab™ (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). And to find a frequency from retinal recording for a short period (e.g. several seconds), a continuous wavelet transform was performed using Matlab.

RESULTS

Spontaneous hyperactivity in degenerated retina; rd1 and rd10 retina

To determine whether hyperactivity emerges in degenerated retina (rd1 and rd10 retina) as Stasheff's recent results [13,24], we examined the spontaneous activity of wild-type (wt), rd1, and rd10 retina. Whereas spontaneous firing rates varied among individual ganglion cells, the frequency of spontaneous activity was significantly higher overall among rd1 and rd10 ganglion cells than among wt ganglion cells at postnatal 8 weeks (p<0.001). But no statistical difference was found in spontaneous firing rates between rd1 and rd10 retinas of postnatal 4 weeks (PNW4) and 8 weeks (PNW8) (p>0.05). This may be seen in the sample raster plots of Fig. 1A and in the comparison of mean firing rates (+/- SEM) for wt, rd1, and rd10 ganglion cells (Fig. 1B). In rd10 ganglion cells, the mean firing rate at PNW8 and PNW30 are significantly higher than that at the other age groups (ANOVA and posthoc Tukey criteria, p=0.05). Considering the non-normal distribution of ganglion cell's firing rate, we calculated median firing rate and compared the difference among age groups (Fig. 1C). In rd10 ganglion cells, the highest and second highest firing rates were observed at PNW30, PNW8, respectively. There was no statistical difference among the other age groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, Tukey criteria, p=0.05).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Spontaneous activity increases with photoreceptor degeneration in rd1 and rd10 ganglion cells. (A) Representative raster plots display extracellular recordings of spontaneous action potentials in wild type (wt), rd1, and rd10 at postnatal ages of 8 weeks. Each panel displays the RGC activity recorded over 10 sec period in a sample of 16 ganglion cells (1 per row) from a single retina. (B) Mean±SEM firing rate of all cells recorded across different postnatal ages. Spontaneous activity significantly increases with aging from postnatal 4 weeks to 8 weeks both in rd1 and rd10 ganglion cells (p<0.05). At PNW8, the mean spike frequency of wt is significantly lower than either rd1 or rd10 (***p<0.001). In rd10, the mean firing rate at PNW8 and PNW30 are highest, and no statistical difference among the other age groups (ANOVA, p=0.05, posthoc Tukey criteria). Statistically significant differences among different age groups are indicated above the mean value (*p<0.05). (C) Median spontaneous firing rates (middle line in each bar) and 1st and 3rd quartiles (ends of bars) are indicated for each of 6 age groups. The median spike rate at PNW8 is the highest, and at PNW30, second highest, and no difference among PNW4, 10, 15, and 20 (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.05, Tukey's criteria). Statistically significant differences among different age groups are indicated above the median value (*p<0.05). Data are from the same recordings in B. The number of cells in each sample is indicated above the bar, with the number of retinas in parentheses. Each retina was from a different animal.

The distribution of firing rates within the ganglion cell shifts to the right in rd1 and rd10 retina, which means that a greater proportion of cells favor higher frequency firing in rd1 and rd10 in comparison with wt retina (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Quantification of spontaneous hyperactivity in rd1 and rd10 ganglion cells. Cumulative frequency histograms display the distribution of mean firing rates among all ganglion cells recorded in normal and degenerating retinas at postnatal 4 weeks (PNW4) (A) and 8 weeks (PNW8) (B) The same cells were used as in Fig. 1. Each panel represents the proportion of the ganglion cell population firing at a rate up to the frequency of x axis. A greater proportion of cells is active at higher rates in rd1 and rd10 mice comparing with wt mice, seen as a rightward shift and steeper slope of the histogram curve.

Rhythmic local field potential and bursting RGC spikes in rd1 and rd10 retina

Rhythmic oscillatory behaviors in field potential waveforms were clearly observed (Fig. 3), similar to those in our previous study [12]. The spectral peak of the field potential was approximately 10 Hz and 4 Hz, rd1 and rd10 retina of PNW8, respectively (Fig. 3. right panel of Ab and Bb). The spontaneous RGC firing pattern also showed a consistent temporal structure with a rhythmic burst of spikes (Fig. 3Ac, Bc). The interspike interval histogram (ISIH) (Fig. 3. right panel of Ac, Bc) demonstrates the temporal structure of spontaneous RGC spike trains in detail. The first peak, at approximately 15 ms, was the result of interspike interval within a single burst of spikes. The second peak, at approximately 100 ms and 240 ms, rd1 and rd10 retina, respectively corresponds to the interburst interval. These results are consistent with the recent results of Stasheff [13], which showed a rhythmic burst of spikes, and with those of Margolis et al. [14], which showed an oscillatory synaptic input and a rhythmic burst of spikes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) A typical raw waveform of neural activity recorded from rd1 (A) and rd10 (B) retina. (b) Field potential waveform (left) obtained from low-pass filtering with 20 Hz cutoff frequency and its power spectral density estimated by the Burg algorithm [23] (right). (c) The spiking activity obtained by high-pass filtering with 100 Hz cutoff frequency (left) shows a temporal structure of rhythmic bursts of spikes, where the interburst interval of ~100 ms (corresponding to ~10 Hz) and ~240 ms (corresponding to ~4 Hz) in rd1 and rd10 retina, respectively.

The temporal structure of the field potential and the spontaneous spike train suggest that the oscillatory waveform of the field potential reflects synaptic input, which produces the rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes that is phase-locked with the oscillatory field potential not only in rd1 but also in rd10 retina. One difference found in power spectrum of field potential between rd1 and rd10 retina (Fig. 3. right panel of Ab, Bb) was the second peak (~8 Hz) was more dominant than the first peak (~4 Hz) in rd10 retina.

Rhythmic local field potential and bursting RGC spikes across different age groups

1. Rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is always phase-locked with the oscillatory field potential in rd1 retina (Fig. 4)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Bursting RGC spikes (left) and its power spectrum (right) (b) LFP (left) and its power spectrum (right) in rd1 retina at postnatal 4 weeks (PNW4) (A) and PNW8 (B). RGC spikes and LFP were obtained with high-pass filtering and low-pass filtering as in Fig. 3. The number of cells is indicated, with the number of retinas in parentheses. There is no statistical difference between the spectral peak in bursting RGC spikes and LFP (p>0.05) in both PNWs.

In rd1 mice, regardless of postnatal ages, there is no statistical difference between the power spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes and LFP at 4 weeks [peak in spike; 9.3±0.9 Hz (n=40), peak in LFP; 9.3±1.3 Hz (n=15); p>0.05] and 8 weeks [peak in spike 10.0±1.3 Hz (n=87), peak in LFP; 10.9±0.8 Hz (n=10); p>0.05].

Also, there is no statistical difference between the peaks in bursting spikes for PNW4 and PNW8, and no statistical difference between the peaks of LFP at PNW4 and PNW8, either.

2. Rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is phase-locked with the first spectral peak of the oscillatory field potential in rd10 retina (Fig. 5)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a) Bursting RGC spikes (left) and its power spectrum (right) (b) LFP (left) and its power spectrum (right) in rd10 retina with PNW4 (A), PNW8 (B), PNW10 (C), PNW15 (D), PNW20 (E), and PNW30 (F). RGC spikes and LFP were obtained with high-pass filtering and low-pass filtering as in Fig. 3 and 4. The number of cells is indicated, with the number of retinas in parentheses. Except PNW4, no statistical difference between the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes and first peak of oscillatory field potential was found among different age groups (ANOVA, p>0.05).

In rd10 mice, except the PNW4 when the degeneration is not fully developed [19], there is strong phase-locking tendency between the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes (~5 Hz) and the first peak of oscillatory field potential (~5 Hz). Even if there is phase-locking tendency between them, the second peak of oscillatory field potential is always the major peak in power spectral density calculated from the 200 sec recording time, which means on average ~10 Hz frequency rhythm is dominant. Table 1 summarized the spectral peaks of bursting RGC spikes and oscillatory field potential among different age groups. There is no statistical difference between the spectral peaks of bursting RGC spikes and oscillatory field potential (ANOVA, p>0.05) except PNW4 and the second peak of oscillatory potential at 10 Hz is roughly two times of the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes at 5 Hz. And second spectral peak at ~10 Hz is the same frequency of LFP observed in rd1 retina.

Table 1.

The frequency of power spectral peaks in bursting RGC spikes and local field potential (LFP) across different postnatal weeks (PNW) from 4 to 30 weeks in rd10 retina

graphic file with name kjpp-15-415-i001.jpg

*Statistical difference between the frequencies of bursting spike and 1st peak of LFP at PNW4 (t-test, p<0.001).

3. ~ 5 Hz frequency is found in continuous wavelet transform calculated from retinal activity for short recording time in rd10 retina

Since spectral peak of ~5 Hz was evident as first peak even if not dominant in power spectrum of oscillatory field potential, we performed the continuous wavelet transform from the retinal recording for short period of time (e.g. a few seconds). Besides strong hot spot at ~10 Hz, there is always substantial hot spot at ~ 5 Hz (Fig. 6), which means this phase locking of ~5 Hz frequency between the oscillatory field potential and bursting spikes in rd10 retina is not robust as the 10 Hz phase locking in rd1 mice, and it runs only a few seconds. Therefore, dominant peak is observed at ~10 Hz when spectral power was calculated from retinal recording for more than a few minutes.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Both in rd1 and rd10 mice, the spontaneous retinal activity (a), spike obtained by high pass filtering (b), LFP obtained by low pass filtering (c), and power spectrum through continuous wavelet transform are shown. (A) In rd1 mice, hot spot is only observed at ~10 Hz frequency (Ad). (B) In rd10 mice, hot spot is more prominent at ~10 Hz frequency but substantial hot spot is also found at ~5 Hz (Bd).

DISCUSSION

We show that in degenerated retina, spontaneous hyperactivity and rhythmic bursting is observed not only in rd1 but also in rd10 mice. In rd1 mice, ~10 Hz rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is always phase-locked with the oscillatory field potential and this phase-locking property is preserved regardless of postnatal ages (PNW4, PNW8). However, in rd10 mice, there is strong phase-locking tendency between the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes at ~5 Hz and the first peak of oscillatory field potential at ~5 Hz across different age groups. But this phase-locking property is not robust as in rd1 retina, but maintains for a few seconds, therefore if the power was calculated from the recording of a few minutes, on average dominant spectral peak of LFP is always observed at ~10 Hz.

Spontaneous hyperactivity in rd10 retina

The change of mean firing rates across different age groups corresponds to Stasheff's recent work [24]; highest firing rates at about 8 weeks. But since they only followed up to the postnatal 120 days (~postnatal 17 weeks), they have not showed the rebound increase of firing rates at PNW30 of ours. At this point, it is not clear why this happens. Clearly, we will need to understand in much greater detail about retinal circuits in each developmental stage in rd10 retina.

Phase-locking at different frequency in rd1 and rd10 retina

Degeneration occurs rapidly, with onset of rod loss at P8 and near complete loss of rods by P21 in rd1 mice [25]. Since photoreceptor degeneration completes by 4 weeks and horizontal cells degenerate by 8 weeks in rd1 mice [26], we used PNW4 and PNW8 rd1 mice, and observed if there is any possible change regarding frequency of oscillatory rhythm in RGC spike and field potential. About 10 Hz rhythmic activities were observed from both spontaneous spikes of RGCs and oscillatory field potential and this rhythm preserved up to PNW8 when the degeneration of horizontal cell completed. Our result can be interpreted once the retinal degeneration completes by 4 weeks, no more change in retinal network develops and the same pattern of information processing continues.

While in rd10 mice, rod degeneration starts around P18, and photoreceptor death is accompanied and followed by dendritic retraction in bipolar and horizontal cells [19]. Recent study of Phillips et al. [27] using rd10 mice at various stages of degeneration ranging from P30 to postnatal month 9.5 (PNM9.5) showed that horizontal cells and rod and cone bipolar cells underwent morphological remodeling including loss of dendrites, cell body migration, and the sprouting of ectopic processes. Despite these changes, the laminar organization of bipolar and amacrine cells and the ON-OFF organization in the inner plexiform layer was largely preserved. Surviving cone and bipolar cell terminals continued to express the appropriate cell-specific presynaptic proteins needed for synaptic function up to PNM9.5 [27]. But this may not guarantee that unchanged normal synaptic function of wild-type retina preserves in rd10 retina, probably the opposite would be true. In our experiment with rd10 retina, at PNW4 the power spectrum of LFP shows very different peak at 7.1 Hz. This might be interpreted that due to incomplete degeneration by 4 weeks, sufficient inhibitory input from horizontal cells still persists; therefore, typical oscillatory field potential has not developed yet. But once the typical oscillatory field potential develops by 8 weeks due to degeneration, it preserves until the PNW30 (p>0.05: comparison among the peaks of LFP).

Before we answer why in rd10 retina phase locking at ~5 Hz frequency runs only for a few seconds not for longer period of time (~minutes) as in rd1 retina, we will need to understand in much greater detail about retinal circuits in each developmental stage in rd1 and rd10 retina. At least, one thing is clear that more complicated neural code is used in rd10 retina; ~5 Hz oscillatory field potential for short period time and long-lasting ~10 Hz oscillatory field potential (corresponds to the first and second peak at power spectrum; Fig. 5Bb, Cb, Db, Eb, and Fb).

Functional role of oscillatory rhythm

Neuronal oscillations appear throughout the nervous system, in structures as diverse as the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, subcortical nuclei and sense organs [28]. Unlike the case for mammalian vision, in which the function of oscillations remains subjects of debate, the behavioral role of synchronous gamma oscillations (20~80 Hz) among retinal dimming detectors is important for frog's survival - it triggers escape behavior [29]. Whether neuronal oscillations contribute to normal function, are merely epiphenomena, or even interfere with physiological processing are topics of vigorous debate [28].

Koepsell et al. reported that individual RGCs multiplex two streams of information; one stream encodes visual information by changes in firing rate time-locked to external visual stimuli, the other stream encodes information using spike timing relative to intrinsic retinal oscillations [30]. Since the oscillatory rhythm of bursting RGC spikes differ in rd1 and rd10 mice in our study, this might be related with the intrinsic property difference encoding the visual information both in rd1 and rd10 mice.

Implication of different phase locking property in rd1 and rd10 retina

Since rd1 and rd10 retina show phase-locking at different frequency (~10 Hz vs. ~5 Hz) between the bursting RGC spikes and oscillatory field potential, we expect different response patterns to electrical stimulus between rd1 and rd10 retina. We already proposed tentative optimal stimulation parameters for electrical stimuli in rd1 retina [17]. Therefore, to extract optimal stimulation parameters in rd10 retina, first we might define selection criteria for responding rd10 ganglion cells to electrical stimulus.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants of Ministry of Health & Welfare (A050251), MEST (2009-0065444, 2010-0020852), and research grant of the Chungbuk National University in 2009.

ABBREVIATIONS

RGC

retinal ganglion cell

LFP

local field potential

MEA

microelectrode array

OFP

oscillatory field potential

RP

retinitis pigmentosa

AMD

age-related macular degeneration

PDE

phosphodiesterase

ERG

electroretinogram

PNW

postnatal week

PNM

postnatal month

References

  • 1.Chader GJ, Weiland J, Humayun MS. Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis. Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:317–332. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17522-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rizzo JF., 3rd Update on retinal prosthetic research: the Boston Retinal Implant Project. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31:160–168. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31821eb79e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Benav H, Besch D, Bruckmann A, Gabel VP, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Harscher A, Kibbel S, Koch J, Kusnyerik A, Peters T, Stingl K, Sachs H, Stett A, Szurman P, Wilhelm B, Wilke R. Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc Biol Sci. 2011;278:1489–1497. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farber DB, Flannery JG, Bowes-Rickman C. The rd mouse story: seventy years of research on an animal model of inherited retinal degeneration. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 1994;13:31–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.LaVail MM, Matthes MT, Yasumura D, Steinberg RH. Variability in rate of cone degeneration in the retinal degeneration (rd/rd) mouse. Exp Eye Res. 1997;65:45–50. doi: 10.1006/exer.1997.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pierce EA. Pathways to photoreceptor cell death in inherited retinal degenerations. Bioessays. 2001;23:605–618. doi: 10.1002/bies.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang B, Hawes NL, Pardue MT, German AM, Hurd RE, Davisson MT, Nusinowitz S, Rengarajan K, Boyd AP, Sidney SS, Phillips MJ, Stewart RE, Chaudhury R, Nickerson JM, Heckenlively JR, Boatright JH. Two mouse retinal degenerations caused by missense mutations in the beta-subunit of rod cGMP phosphodiesterase gene. Vision Res. 2007;47:624–633. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otani A, Dorrell MI, Kinder K, Moreno SK, Nusinowitz S, Banin E, Heckenlively J, Friedlander M. Rescue of retinal degeneration by intravitreally injected adult bone marrowderived lineage-negative hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:765–774. doi: 10.1172/JCI21686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rex TS, Allocca M, Domenici L, Surace EM, Maguire AM, Lyubarsky A, Cellerino A, Bennett J, Auricchio A. Systemic but not intraocular Epo gene transfer protects the retina from light-and genetic-induced degeneration. Mol Ther. 2004;10:855–861. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Picard E, Jonet L, Sergeant C, Vesvres MH, Behar-Cohen F, Courtois Y, Jeanny JC. Overexpressed or intraperitoneally injected human transferrin prevents photoreceptor degeneration in rd10 mice. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2612–2625. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pang JJ, Dai X, Boye SE, Barone I, Boye SL, Mao S, Everhart D, Dinculescu A, Liu L, Umino Y, Lei B, Chang B, Barlow R, Strettoi E, Hauswirth WW. Long-term retinal function and structure rescue using capsid mutant AAV8 vector in the rd10 mouse, a model of recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Mol Ther. 2011;19:234–242. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ye JH, Goo YS. The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mice recorded with a multi-electrode array. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:1079–1088. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stasheff SF. Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99:1408–1421. doi: 10.1152/jn.00144.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Margolis DJ, Newkirk G, Euler T, Detwiler PB. Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6526–6536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1533-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ryu SB, Ye JH, Lee JS, Goo YS, Kim CH, Kim KH. Electrically-evoked neural activities of rd1 mice retinal ganglion cells by repetitive pulse stimulation. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;13:443–448. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2009.13.6.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ryu SB, Ye JH, Goo YS, Kim CH, Kim KH. Temporal response properties of retinal ganglion cells in rd1 mice evoked by amplitude-modulated electrical pulse trains. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6762–6769. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goo YS, Ye JH, Lee S, Nam Y, Ryu SB, Kim KH. Retinal ganglion cell responses to voltage and current stimulation in wild-type and rd1 mouse retinas. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:035003. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/035003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Della Santina L, Bouly M, Asta A, Demontis GC, Cervetto L, Gargini C. Effect of HCN channel inhibition on retinal morphology and function in normal and dystrophic rodents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1016–1023. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gargini C, Terzibasi E, Mazzoni F, Strettoi E. Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: a morphological and ERG study. J Comp Neurol. 2007;500:222–238. doi: 10.1002/cne.21144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Munk MH, Neuenschwander S. High-frequency oscillations (20 to 120 Hz) and their role in visual processing. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;17:341–360. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200007000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goo YS, Ahn KN, Song YJ, Ryu SB, Kim KH. Comparison of basal oscillatory rhythm of retinal activities in rd1 and rd10 mice; Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011. pp. 1093–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E. Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vision Res. 2000;40:1785–1795. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hayes MH. Statistical digital signal processing and modeling. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stasheff SF, Shankar M, Andrews MP. Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:3002–3009. doi: 10.1152/jn.00704.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carter-Dawson LD, LaVail MM, Sidman RL. Differential effect of the rd mutation on rods and cones in the mouse retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17:489–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Strettoi E, Porciatti V, Falsini B, Pignatelli V, Rossi C. Morphological and functional abnormalities in the inner retina of the rd/rd mouse. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5492–5504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05492.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Phillips MJ, Otteson DC, Sherry DM. Progression of neuronal and synaptic remodeling in the rd10 mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:2071–2089. doi: 10.1002/cne.22322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koepsell K, Wang X, Hirsch JA, Sommer FT. Exploring the function of neural oscillations in early sensory systems. Front Neurosci. 2010;4:53. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.010.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arai I, Yamada Y, Asaka T, Tachibana M. Light-evoked oscillatory discharges in retinal ganglion cells are generated by rhythmic synaptic inputs. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:715–725. doi: 10.1152/jn.00159.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koepsell K, Wang X, Vaingankar V, Wei Y, Wang Q, Rathbun DL, Usrey WM, Hirsch JA, Sommer FT. Retinal oscillations carry visual information to cortex. Front Syst Neurosci. 2009;3:4. doi: 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology : Official Journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Korean Physiological Society and Korean Society of Pharmacology

RESOURCES