Skip to main content
Journal of Women's Health logoLink to Journal of Women's Health
. 2012 Jan;21(1):73–79. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2893

Early Age at First Intercourse and Subsequent Gaps in Contraceptive Use

Brianna M Magnusson 1,, Saba W Masho 1, Kate L Lapane 1
PMCID: PMC3283439  PMID: 21992618

Abstract

Background

Sexual debut before age 15 years has been associated with increased sexual risk behaviors among teens, but little is known about its effects beyond adolescence. This study examines the relationship between the age at first intercourse and subsequent contraceptive gaps.

Methods

We identified 3538 sexually active, fertile women participants from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth. Women were classified as consistent contraceptive users or inconsistent/nonusers. Age at first intercourse with a man was determined by self-report and categorized as <15, 15–17, and ≥18 years.

Results

Twenty-three percent reported gaps in contraceptive use in the year prior to interview. Compared with women who were 18 or older at first intercourse, women who were <15 years of age at the time of first intercourse were nearly two times as likely to report a gap in contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio: 1.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.23–3.00).

Conclusions

Age at first intercourse is associated with inconsistent or nonuse of contraceptives in later life. Primary prevention efforts should be established to empower girls to make informed and autonomous decisions about sexual debut. Personalized contraceptive counseling has been demonstrated as being effective in increasing contraceptive use and compliance and should be offered to all women, with particular focus on women who report an early age at first intercourse or other factors associated with inconsistent contraceptive use.

Introduction

The average age of sexual debut for girls in the United States is 17 years of age.1 Sociodemographic factors associated with contraceptive use have been well documented.24 Sexual debut before age 15 years has been associated with increased sexual risk behaviors including unprotected intercourse,5 multiple sexual partners,6 and pregnancy7 among teens. Although recent research has begun to examine the importance of the timing of sexual debut on physical, mental,8 and reproductive outcomes throughout life,9 little is known about the effect of sexual debut before age 15 years beyond adolescence. Previously, we reported that sexual debut before age 15 years (in particular, involuntary sexual debut before age 15 years) was associated with increased risk of experiencing multiple unintended pregnancies later in life,10 suggesting that early sexual experiences may influence a woman's reproductive health beyond adolescence.

Persistent nonuse or gaps in contraceptive use among sexually active, fecund women who were not planning a pregnancy put them at risk for unintended pregnancy. In the United States, each year there are 3.1 million unintended pregnancies, 50% of which occur among women not using contraceptives in the month of conception.11 Approximately half of unintended pregnancies end in abortion.11 Unintended pregnancies resulting in births are associated with detrimental prenatal behavior, including drug and alcohol abuse, and poor birth outcomes.12 Additionally, unintended pregnancies resulting in births account for 51% of publicly funded births nationwide, accounting for $11.1 billion in public maternity care expenditures.13 Contraceptive nonuse is one of the most important processes contributing to unintended pregnancy. Approximately 10% of sexually active, fertile women not seeking a pregnancy are persistent nonusers of contraceptives, and an additional 15% of women experience a gap in contraceptive use lasting at least 1 month.2,4 Contraceptive use gaps are associated with black race, lower levels of education, being uninsured or having Medicaid, being >40 years of age, and having infrequent intercourse.2 This study seeks to examine the relationship between the age of first vaginal intercourse and subsequent gaps in contraceptive use. Understanding the impact of the timing of first intercourse on contraceptive nonuse later in life may be important in promoting contraceptive use and preventing unintended pregnancy.

Materials and Methods

Data were obtained from the first data release of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) comprised of 7356 face-to-face interviews with women aged 15–44 years, collected between July 2006 and December 2008. The NSFG is designed to collect information on factors affecting “childbearing, marriage, and parenthood from a national probability sample of women and men 15–44 years of age”.14 The sampling procedure has been described elsewhere.15 We obtained ethical approval from the Virginia Commonwealth University Human Subjects Review Board.

For this study we sought to identify women at risk of unintended pregnancy. That is, we did not include women who were currently pregnant (n=330) or trying to conceive (n=242), who reported that they had never had sex (n=1027) or did not have at least one sex partner in the year prior to interview (n=656). A total of 67 women had missing contraceptive use data and an additional 144 women had missing data on one of the other variables in the analysis.

The remaining 3358 women who reported that they were fecund (i.e., not surgically or medically sterile) were included in the analysis.

Women reported whether or not they had intercourse with a male partner within the 12 months preceding the interview. For each month in which women reported sexual activity, the participants reported any contraceptive method use, including partner's vasectomy or withdrawal. We classified women into two categories of contraceptive use: (1) consistent users (reference category) or (2) inconsistent users. Women were considered to be consistent users of contraception if they reported the use of any type of contraceptive method in each sexually active month, regardless of the number of sexually active months. Inconsistent users were women reporting a contraceptive use gap of at least one sexually active month. All contraceptive methods were considered equally without any differentiation by method.

The primary determinant of interest was age at first intercourse. To assess age at first intercourse, women were asked, “At any time in your life, have you ever had sexual intercourse with a man, that is, made love, had sex, or gone all the way?” Women were specifically instructed not to count oral or anal sex, heavy petting, or other forms of sexual activity that did not involve vaginal penetration. Women answering yes to this question were then asked for the month and year of this first intercourse and their age at the time of first intercourse. Age at first sexual intercourse was categorized as <15, 15–17, and ≥18 years. This categorization allowed comparison to previous literature.10,16

We reviewed the literature to understand which factors have been associated with age at first intercourse and/or contraceptive use. These fell in three domains: sociodemographic factors, childhood factors, and sexual history factors.

Contraceptive gaps and nonuse are associated with race/ethnicity, education, insurance status, age, and marital status.2,11 Thus we considered each respondent's age at interview (15–19, 20–34, 35–45 years), education (less than high school, high school graduate or equivalent, or at least some college), self-reported race and ethnicity (white, non-Hispanic, black, non-Hispanic, Hispanic, or other non-Hispanic), whether respondent was foreign born, and marital status (married, cohabitating, formerly married, not cohabitating, or never married). Economic factors may influence a woman's ability to obtain and consistently use contraceptive drugs or devices; therefore, we considered economic indicators at the time of interview including current insurance status (private insurance, Medicaid, or no coverage) and poverty status based on income as a percentage of the federal poverty level (<100%, 100–199%, or >200%).

Adolescent sexual behavior research has shown that childhood and family factors including socioeconomic status during childhood,17,18 parental living situation,17,18 and mother's reproductive history, particularly early childbearing,17,19 are associated with the occurrence of adolescent pregnancy,20 earlier sexual intercourse,17,20 and more risky sexual practices including increased number of lifetime sex partners.17,18 These factors are also associated with multiple unintended pregnancies.10 Childhood family status was assessed by asking respondents about the parents or parental figures they resided with at age 14. Parental living situation at age 14 was then categorized as living with two biological or adoptive parents or living in any other parental or nonparental situation. To estimate socioeconomic status during childhood, respondents were asked to identify the highest level of education that their mother or mother figure (less than high school, high school graduate, or at least some college) and that their father or father figure had completed (less than high school, high school graduate, at least some college, or no father figure). “No father figure” was considered to be a valid category because the absence of a father in the home has meaning as a proxy for childhood socioeconomic status.21

Having a mother who was a teenage mother has been associated with early age of intercourse, having a teen pregnancy, and other sexual risk behaviors.22,23 Respondents were asked to identify their mother's age at the time of her first birth, from which we identified women whose mother had a first birth during her teens, defined as <18 years of age.

Finally, we considered the respondent's sexual history variables, specifically the number of sexual partners in the 12 months before the interview (1 or ≥2) and the number of months in the prior year with at least one reported episode of intercourse with a male partner (1–4, 5–9, 10–12 months). We also evaluated whether the respondent had ever been pregnant, her future pregnancy intentions, and abortion history. Pregnancy and abortion history were based on self report. Two dummy variables using a nested coding approach were defined.24 First, women were classified as ever having been pregnant (yes/no). Then, women who had at least one pregnancy were asked how each pregnancy ended (live birth, stillbirth, pregnancy loss, or abortion). The number of abortions was counted and women were classified as having ever had an abortion (yes/no). With this approach we were able to evaluate the effect of abortion history only among women having experienced at least one pregnancy. Women were considered as intending a future pregnancy if they responded “yes” or undecided to the survey question, “Looking to the future, do you, yourself want to have a baby (or another baby)?” These categories were considered together because we hypothesized that women undecided about their future childbearing intentions would be more similar to those desiring to preserve fertility with respect to contraceptive decision making.

Statistical analysis

To account for the complex survey design of the NSFG, all analyses of the data were conducted using SUDAAN, 25 with sample weights provided in the NSFG.15 We first compared the characteristics of women according to their category of contraceptive use (inconsistent and consistent users [referent]). Logistic regression models were used to understand the relationship between age at first intercourse and inconsistent contraceptive use adjusting for sociodemographic, childhood, and sexual history variables. An iterative process of modeling was employed in which potential confounders were individually introduced into the model. Potential confounders were retained in the model if their addition resulted in a greater than 10% change in the odds ratio for the association between age at first intercourse and inconsistent or nonuse of contraceptives. To determine if the impact of age at first intercourse decreases with increasing age at interview we conducted a sensitivity analysis of women at least 18 years old at first interview and stratified the crude and fully adjusted model by age at interview (18–24, 25–34, or 35–44 years). Additionally, to estimate the effect of involuntary first sex on the relationship between age at first intercourse and contraceptive use gaps, we conducted a sensitivity analysis among women 18 or older at the time of interview (for whom the relevant question was asked).

Results

The average age of first intercourse in our sample was 17.5 years of age, with 13% (n=517) of women reporting their first intercourse at <15 years of age. Inconsistent use of contraceptives in the year prior to interview was reported by 22.7% of women. Among contraceptive users, the most common methods used in the month prior to interview were the oral contraceptive pill (31%), condoms (21%), and various forms of long-acting reversible contraceptives (e.g., intrauterine devices, injectables or implants; 10%). Characteristics of the sample by contraceptive use status are summarized in Table 1. Compared with consistent users of contraceptives, inconsistent users were more likely to be black or Hispanic, married or cohabitating, and have lower levels of education, lower income, and Medicaid or no insurance coverage. Inconsistent users were also more likely to report at least one pregnancy and have less frequent intercourse in the year prior to interview, as compared with consistent users. Having a mother or father with less than a high school education was associated with an increased risk of inconsistent use of contraceptives in crude models, but lost significance after adjustment for the respondent's own highest level of education.

Table 1.

Respondent Characteristics by Contraceptive Use in the Year Before Interview

 
Inconsistent use n=791 (22.7%) Weighted n=6,531,544
Consistent use n=2747 (77.3%) Weighted n=22,252,561
  Weighted %
Age at first intercourse, years
 <15 20.2 11.0
 15–17 49.4 46.6
 ≥18 30.4 42.4
Sociodemographic factors
Age at interview, years
 15–19 10.3 12.4
 20–34 64.7 60.3
 35–45 25.0 27.3
Education
 Less than high school 24.2 13.9
 High school graduate 26.6 21.8
 At least some college 49.2 64.3
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic 58.2 66.3
 Black, non-Hispanic 17.4 12.5
 Hispanic 19.3 14.4
 Other, non-Hispanic 5.2 6.8
Foreign born 14.5 15.7
Poverty levela
 <100% FPL 27.1 15.5
 100–199% FPL 26.6 20.9
 ≥200% FPL 46.3 63.5
Insurance status
 Private insurance 53.9 71.3
 Medicaid 22.0 9.9
 No coverage 24.2 18.7
Marital status
 Married 49.5 42.5
 Cohabitating 15.6 14.1
 Formerly married 10.1 6.8
 Never married 24.9 36.6
Childhood/adolescent factors
Lived with 1 or 0 biological/adoptive parents 36.5 32.5
Mother <18 years at first birth 17.1 13.3
Mother's highest education
 Less than high school 25.0 19.0
 High school graduate 32.0 31.3
 At least some college 43.1 49.7
 Father's highest education
 Less than high school 25.2 16.4
 High school graduate 28.4 28.3
 At least some college 38.9 48.1
 No father figure present 7.5 7.2
Sexual history variables
Ever pregnant
 Intends future pregnancy/does not know intent 61.0 60.7
Abortion history
 One or more abortions 16.6 13.7
 No abortions 63.9 41.9
 Never pregnant 19.5 44.4
No. of months had sex
 1–4 14.4 14.3
 5–9 24.9 18.9
 10–12 60.8 66.8
 ≥2 sex partners in last 12 months 15.4 16.3
a

FPL, federal poverty level.

Table 2 shows the relationship between age at sexual debut and contraceptive use. Experiencing first intercourse before age 15 was associated with an increased risk of reporting inconsistent use of contraceptives in the year prior to interview. Relative to women reporting a sexual debut at 18 years of age or older, women reporting age at first sexual intercourse as less than 15 years were more likely to report inconsistent use (crude odds ratio [OR]: 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72–3.87), as well as women whose sexual debut was between 15 and 17 years (crude OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11–1.98). After adjustment for all potential confounders, as compared with women who were 18 or older at first intercourse, women who were <15 years old at the time of first intercourse were 1.93 times as likely (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23–3.00) to have inconsistent contraceptive use in the year prior to interview and women who were 15–17 years old at the time of first intercourse were 1.23 times as likely to use contraceptives inconsistently (aOR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.89–1.70).

Table 2.

Association Between Age at First Intercourse and Inconsistent or Nonuse of Contraceptives

  Crude odds ratio (95% confidence interval) Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)a
Age at first intercourse, years
 <15 2.57 (1.72–3.87) 1.93 (1.23–3.00)
 15–17 1.48 (1.11–1.98) 1.23 (0.89–1.70)
 ≥18 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
Sociodemographic factors
Education
 Less than high school 2.28 (1.49–3.48) 1.82 (1.16–2.84)
 High school graduate 1.59 (1.19–2.12) 1.29 (0.98–1.72)
 At least some college 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
Age at interview, years
 15–19 0.77 (0.54–1.12) 0.77 (0.44–1.35)
 20–34 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
 35–45 0.85 (.59–1.23) 0.90 (0.57–1.42)
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
 Black, non-Hispanic 1.58 (1.10–2.28) 1.28 (0.81–2.01)
 Hispanic 1.53 (1.04–2.27) 1.14 (0.76–1.71)
 Other, non-Hispanic 0.87 (0.44–1.72) 1.12 (0.54–2.34)
Foreign born 0.91 (0.67–1.22) 0.58 (0.37–0.92)
Poverty level
 <100% FPL 2.39 (1.59–3.60) 1.52 (1.03–2.25)
 100–199% FPL 1.75 (1.17–2.61) 1.30 (0.83–2.02)
 ≥200% FPL 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
Insurance status
 Private insurance 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
 Medicaid 2.92 (1.88–4.54) 1.77 (1.12–2.79)
 No coverage 1.71 (1.24–2.34) 1.24 (0.88–1.74)
Marital status
 Married 1.71 (1.18–2.48) 2.50 (1.54–4.08)
 Cohabitating 1.63 (1.15–2.30) 1.63 (1.08–2.47)
 Formerly married 2.17 (1.18–4.00) 1.88 (0.91–3.87)
 Never married 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
Childhood/adolescent factors
Lived with 1 or 0 biological/adoptive parents 1.19 (0.87–1.64) 0.78 (0.54–1.12)
Mother <18 years at first birth 1.35 (0.96–1.91) 0.94 (0.63–1.39)
Mother's highest level of education
 Less than high school 1.52 (1.06–2.18) 0.84 (0.56–1.26)
 High school graduate 1.18 (0.88–1.59) 0.94 (0.70–1.27)
 At least some college 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
Father's highest level of education
 Less than high school 1.90 (1.29–2.79) 1.20 (0.75–1.91)
 High school graduate 1.24 (0.94–1.63) 0.96 (0.69–1.35)
 At least some college 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
 No father figure 1.29 (0.79–2.10) 0.93 (0.49–1.80)
Sexual history factors
Ever pregnant 3.48 (2.55–4.76) 2.82 (1.87–4.26)
Intends future pregnancy/does not know intent 1.01 (0.76–1.34) 1.58 (1.11–2.25)
Ever had an abortion 0.77 (0.53–1.19) 0.87 (0.62–1.21)
≥2 sex partners in last 12 months 0.93 (0.64–1.35) 1.06 (0.67–1.67)
No. of months had sex
 1–4 1.11 (0.70–1.75) 1.54 (0.99–2.38)
 5–9 1.44 (1.09–1.91) 2.08 (1.54–2.83)
 10–12 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
a

Adjusted for all factors on the table.

While other factors predominate gaps in contraceptive use among women interviewed between ages 18 and 24 years, being <15 years at first sex remained an important factor for women aged 25–34 or 35–44 years at time of interview (data not shown). After adjustment for all potential confounders women who were 25–34 or 35–44 years old at time of interview and <15 years of age at first intercourse had two times (aOR25-34yrs: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.08–3.72) and 4.5 times (aOR35-44yrs: 4.51; 95% CI: 1.58–12.84) increased likelihood of inconsistent contraceptive use as compared with women in the same age group who were 18 or older at first intercourse. Among women who were 18–24 years old at interview, those who reported their first intercourse at less than 15 years of age were no more likely to report inconsistent contraceptive use as compared with women who were 18 or older at first intercourse (aOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.29–2.00).

Approximately 7% of eligible women over 18 years (of whom the question was asked) reported that their first intercourse was nonvoluntary. Among women <15 years at first intercourse, 18% reported nonvoluntary first sex, compared with 5% and 6% of women who were 15–17 and 18 years or older, respectively, at first intercourse. For women reporting first intercourse at <15 years of age, the magnitude of the association was similar for women reporting that intercourse to be voluntary (aOR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.22–3.15) and nonvoluntary (aOR: 1.96; 95% CI: 0.77–5.02) compared with women reporting voluntary first intercourse at 18 years or older. However, the confidence interval for nonvoluntary intercourse is wide and contains 1. A similar pattern was observed for women who were 15–17 years at first intercourse (voluntary aOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.89–1.73 and nonvoluntary aOR: 1.61 95% CI: 0.90–2.88).

Discussion

This study confirms that the effects of early sexual experiences may linger well beyond adolescence. Our findings are consistent with previous reports supporting the importance of age at sexual debut on sexual health outcomes.9,10 Indeed, this study illustrates that the impact of sexual debut at <15 years of age on contraceptive use may persist beyond adolescence.

Contraceptive use is an expression of a woman's reproductive control and is affected by access to family planning services and a variety of sociodemographic factors, relationship dynamics, societal norms, and economic factors. We found that 23% of sexually active women had a gap in contraceptive use lasting at least 1 month, despite not seeking pregnancy. Contraceptive use is one of the most important tools for reducing the burden of unplanned pregnancies. Consistent with 2002 and 2006 NSFG data,26 we identified 8.1% of our sample as nonusers and 14.6% as those who had a gap of at least 1 month. This is comparable with the United Kingdom and Europe and exceeds less developed countries.27

Prior research has noted coercive first intercourse is associated with reduced control over subsequent sexual relationships28 and a reduced ability to use contraceptives effectively28 and is strongly associated with experiencing multiple unintended pregnancies.10 Further, coercive sex, including childhood sexual abuse, has been associated with increased risky sex behaviors29 and a reduction in self-efficacy,30 which may contribute to inconsistent contraceptive use. In our nationally representative sample of U.S. women, 18% of those reporting sexual debut before age 15 years indicated that the sexual act was not voluntary. However, this may be a conservative estimate due to underreporting of coercive acts. That we did not find a larger association between contraceptive use gaps among those reporting nonvoluntary first intercourse may be a function of underreporting or small sample size.

We stratified by age to determine the extent to which the impact of age at first intercourse changes with increasing time. Our findings indicate that women who were 25–44 years at interview and <15 years at first intercourse had higher odds of inconsistent contraceptive use compared with similar women who were 18 years or older at first intercourse. Whereas women aged 18–24 years at interview and less than 15 years at first intercourse were no more likely to experience contraceptive use gaps as compared with women in the same age group with later sexual debut. We cannot rule out that the age-stratified analyses represent a cohort effect. As societal norms regarding the social acceptability of adolescent and premarital intercourse have changed over time, the impact of age at first intercourse may differentially affect women coming of age with different societal expectations. Additionally, women who were older at time of interview may have been in more stable relationships or held beliefs of subfecundity that reduced incentive to use contraception.

Several hypotheses may explain why sexual debut at <15 years is related to later contraceptive use. First, women who engage in their first intercourse at younger ages may be risk-prone. Risk-proneness is defined as the propensity to be attracted to potentially risky behavior.31 Early intercourse has been associated with an increase in sexual risk behavior including decreased condom and contraceptive use and unintended pregnancies,57 but may in fact represent an indicator of individuals who have an increased attraction to or tolerance of risk. Identifying such risk-prone individuals in early adolescence and providing specific contraceptive information and readiness discussions may be warranted. Second, sexual debut at <15 years is more likely to be nonvoluntary and even when reported as voluntary, young adults reporting younger age at first intercourse are more likely to report a nonautonomous reason for engaging in intercourse (such as peer pressure or desire to please a partner), experience regret with respect to the timing of intercourse, and report that they wished they had waited longer. If sexual debut at these ages is nonvoluntary or induced by peer-pressure, it may reduce self-efficacy and influence a woman's ability to protect herself from sexual risks.32 Primary prevention efforts to empower girls to make informed and autonomous decisions about sexual debut as well as cognitive–behavioral interventions aimed at increasing sexually assertive beliefs, behaviors, and practices32 for women of all ages may be justified.

Nevertheless, these findings do have implications for practice. Brief counseling in clinics is associated with increased sexual health knowledge and lower rates of sexually transmitted infection in young women.33 A recent study found that among women aged 35–44 years, contraceptive counseling was associated with lower rates of nonuse,34 and personalized contraceptive counseling has been shown to improve contraceptive adherence.35 However, less than 20% of women overall report that they have received any form of contraceptive counseling in the 12 months prior to interview. Inquiring about age at first intercourse on patient intake forms may assist providers in identifying women at higher risk for contraceptive use gaps and allow for targeted contraceptive and behavioral counseling.

These data must be considered with several caveats. First, data on psychological factors that may be associated with contraceptive use, such as depression and risk proneness, are not available in the NSFG. Second, contraceptive use in this study was evaluated as self-reported use of any contraceptive drug or device during a month in which intercourse was reported. This definition of contraceptive use is limited in that it does not consider whether contraceptives were used correctly, consistently, or with every episode of intercourse. Additionally as most women in the sample relied on the same methods (pill, condom, long-acting reversible contraceptives), all contraceptive drugs and devices were considered equal, which does not address differences in obtaining, use, and effectiveness of methods. Further, we classified women according to biological age at sexual debut. A more appropriate concept may be sexual readiness, which is characterized by evaluating planning, whether intercourse was consensual, absence of regret, and autonomy of the decision to have sex.36 Future research should include an evaluation of sexual readiness at first intercourse.

Conclusion

In summary, inconsistent or nonuse of contraceptives is a common, but potentially modifiable factor. In the United States, 3.1 million unintended pregnancies occur each year.11 Because 50% of unintended pregnancies occur among women not using contraceptives in the month of conception,11 it is important to further our understanding of factors contributing to gaps in contraceptive use. These findings demonstrate that a young age at first intercourse may affect a woman's reproductive health throughout her life. Our findings may give reason to consider interventions that delay sexual initiation, as well as interventions to promote consistent contraceptive use throughout reproductive life.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a dissertation assistantship from Virginia Commonwealth University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University. The project described was supported in part by award number UL1RR031990 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources, National Cancer Institute, or the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Chandra A. Martinez GM. Mosher WD. Abma JC. Jones J. Fertility, family planning and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Vital Health Stat. 2005 Dec;23(25):1–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu J. Meldrum S. Dozier A. Stanwood N. Fiscella K. Contraceptive nonuse among US women at risk for unplanned pregnancy. Contraception. 2008;78:284–289. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frost J. Singh S. Finer LB. Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39:90–99. doi: 10.1363/3909007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frost JJ. Singh S. Finer LD. U.S. women's one-year contraceptive use patterns 2004. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39:48–55. doi: 10.1363/3904807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cavazos-Rehg PA. Krauss MJ. Spitznagel EL, et al. Type of contraception method used at last intercourse and associations with health risk behaviors among US adolescents. Contraception. 2010;82:549–555. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santelli JS. Brener ND. Lowry R. Bhatt A. Zabin LS. Multiple sexual partners among U.S. adolescents and young adults. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elis BJ. Bates JE. Dodge KA, et al. Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy? Child Dev. 2003;74:801–821. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jamieson LK. Wade TJ. Early age of first sexual intercourse and depressive symptomatology among adolescents. J Sex Res. 2010 Sep;14:1–11. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.509892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sandfort TG. Orr M. Hirsch JS. Santelli J. Long-term health correlates of timing of sexual debut: results from a national US study. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:155–161. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Magnusson BM. Masho SW. Lapane KL. Adolescent and sexual history factors associated with reproductive control in US women aged 18–44. Sex Health. 2011;8:95–101. doi: 10.1071/SH10007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finer LB. Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.090.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kost K. Landry DJ. Darroch JE. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sonfield A. Kost K. Gold RB. Finer LB. The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43:94–102. doi: 10.1363/4309411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lepkowski JM. Mosher WD. Davis KE. Groves RM. Van Hoewyk J. The 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2010;2(150) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Groves RM. Mosher WD. Lepkowski J. Kirgis NG. Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2009;1(48):1–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O'Donnell L. O'Donnel CR. Stueve A. Early sexual initiation and subsequent sex-related risks among urban minority youth: The Reach for Health Study. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33:268–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manlove J. Romano-Papillo A. Ikramullah E. Not yet: programs to delay first sex among teens. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Manlove J. Franzetta K. McKinney K. Romano-Papillo A. Terry-Humen E. No time to waste: programs to reduce teen pregnancy among middle school-aged youth. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.O'Connor ML. Women who were born to teenage mothers have nearly double the risk of early child bearing. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997;29:243–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Resnick MD. Bearman PS. Blum RW, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. JAMA. 1997;278:823–832. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.U.S. Census Bureau, Children's Living Arrangements and Characteristics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; Mar, 2002. 2003. P20–547, Table C8. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maynard RA. A Special Report on the Costs of Adolescent Childbearing. New York: Robin Hood Foundation; 1996. Kids Having Kids. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hardy JB. Shapiro S. Astone NM. Miller TL. Brooks-Gunn J. Hilton S. Adolescent childbearing revisited: the age of inner-city mothers at delivery is a determinant of their children's self-sufficiency at age 27 to 33. Pediatrics. 1997;100:802–809. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.5.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rothman K. Greenland S. Lash T. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. pp. 407–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mosher WD. Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(29) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2005. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2005/WCU2005.htm. [May 25;2011 ]. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2005/WCU2005.htm
  • 28.Williams CM. Brett KM. Abma JC. Coercive first intercourse and unintended first births. Violence Vict. 2009;24:351–363. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.24.3.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Howard DE. Wang MQ. Psychosocial correlates of U.S. adolescent who report a history of forced sexual intercourse. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36:372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walsh JF. Foshee V. Self-efficacy, self determination and victim blaming as predictors of adolescent sexual victimization. Health Ed Res. 1998;13:139–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zuckerman M. Sensation Seeking: The Balance Between Risk and Reward. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing; 1991. pp. 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rickert VI. Sanghvi R. Wiemann CM. Is lack of sexual assertiveness among adolescent and young adult women a cause for concern? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:178–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kamb ML. Fishbein M. Douglas JM, et al. Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT study group. JAMA. 1998;280:1161–1167. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.13.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Upson K. Reed SD. Prager SW. Schiff MA. Factors associated with contraceptive nonuse among US women ages 35–44 years at risk of unwanted pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81:427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weisman CS. Maccannon DS. Henderson JT. Shortridge E. Orso CL. Contraceptive counseling in managed care: preventing unintended pregnancy in adults. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12:79–95. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(01)00147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hawes ZC. Wellings K. Stephenson J. First heterosexual intercourse in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. J Sex Res. 2010;47:137–152. doi: 10.1080/00224490903509399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES