Abstract

The lacZ gene from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081, encoding a β-galactosidase of the glycoside hydrolase family GH2, was cloned into different inducible lactobacillal expression vectors for overexpression in the host strain Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. High expression levels were obtained in laboratory cultivations with yields of approximately 53000 U of β-galactosidase activity per liter of medium, which corresponds to ∼170 mg of recombinant protein per liter and β-galactosidase levels amounting to 63% of the total intracellular protein of the host organism. The wild-type (nontagged) and histidine-tagged recombinant enzymes were purified to electrophoretic homogeneity and further characterized. β-Galactosidase from L. bulgaricus was used for lactose conversion and showed very high transgalactosylation activity. The maximum yield of galacto-oligosaccharides (GalOS) was approximately 50% when using an initial concentration of 600 mM lactose, indicating that the enzyme can be of interest for the production of GalOS.
Keywords: β-galactosidase, lactase, transgalactosylation, galacto-oligosaccharides, prebiotics
Introduction
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and especially lactobacilli are important starter and adjunct cultures in the production of foods that require lactic acid fermentation, notably various dairy products, fermented vegetables, fermented meats, and sourdough bread.1,2Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (L. bulgaricus), a thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium with an optimal growth temperature of 45 °C, is one of the economically most important representatives of the heterogeneous group of LAB, with a worldwide application in yogurt production and in other fermented milk products.3L. bulgaricus is a homofermentative LAB, and during growth in milk it rapidly converts lactose into lactic acid for food product preservation. The metabolism of lactose in this organism involves two main enzymes, a lactose antiporter permease (LacS) for the uptake of the sugar and a β-galactosidase (LacZ) for the intracellular cleavage of lactose into glucose and galactose, both of which are part of the lac operon.4Lactobacillus spp. encode β-galactosidases that belong to glycoside hydrolase families GH2 and GH42 according to the CAZy nomenclature (http://www.cazy.org).5 The predominant GH2 β-galactosidases found in lactobacilli are of the LacLM type, heterodimeric proteins of ∼105 kDa, which are encoded by the two overlapping genes, lacL and lacM. We recently cloned several lactobacillal β-galactosidase genes of this type, including lacLM from Lactobacillus reuteri,6Lactobacillus acidophilus,7Lactobacillus pentosus,8Lactobacillus plantarum,9 and Lactobacillus sakei,10 and characterized the resulting proteins with respect to their biochemical properties. In addition, di- or oligomeric GH2 β-galactosidases of the LacZ type, encoded by the single lacZ gene, are sometimes, but not often, found in lactobacilli, whereas they are more frequent in other LAB including Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus thermophilus(11) or bifidobacteria including Bifidobacterium bifidum(12) or Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis.13
β-Galactosidases catalyze the hydrolysis of the β-1,4-d-glycosidic linkage of lactose and structurally related substrates. β-Galactosidases have two main technological applications in the food industry—the removal of lactose from milk and dairy products14 and the production of galacto-oligosaccharides (GalOS), exploiting the transglycosylation activity of some of these enzymes.15,16 GalOS are prebiotic sugars, which are defined as a “selectively fermented ingredient that allows specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity in the gastrointestinal microbiota that confers benefits upon host well-being and health”.17 GalOS are complex mixtures of different oligosaccharides, and the spectrum of the oligosaccharides making up these mixtures strongly depends on the source of the β-galactosidase used for the biocatalytic reaction as well as on the conversion conditions used in their production.15,18 Rabiu et al.19 and Tzortzis et al.20 produced various GalOS mixtures using lactose as substrate and β-galactosidases from different probiotic bifidobacteria. Subsequently, they showed that these different mixtures typically resulted in better growth of the producer strain of the enzyme for GalOS production. This concept can serve as the basis for a new generation of functionally enhanced, targeted oligosaccharides and has increased interest in β-galactosidases from beneficial probiotic organisms.21 Because lactobacilli have traditionally been recognized as potentially health-promoting, probiotic bacteria,22 GalOS produced by their β-galactosidases can be of interest for nutritional purposes. In the present study we report the heterologous expression of the single-gene encoded β-galactosidase (LacZ) from L. bulgaricus in L. plantarum using pSIP vectors and, thus, the overexpression of this enzyme in a food grade host. In addition, the β-galactosidase was purified, characterized, and compared to the enzymes of the LacLM type, also with respect to the spectrum of GalOS produced by these different β-galactosidases.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Enzymes
All chemicals and enzymes were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated and were of the highest quality available. MRS broth powder was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) were from Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania).
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
The type strain L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081 (synonym L. bulgaricus; other collection numbers are ATCC 11842; originally isolated from Bulgarian yogurt in 191923) was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ; Braunschweig, Germany). All bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1. Lactobacillus strains were cultivated in MRS media at 37 °C, without agitation. Escherichia coli NEB5α (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was grown at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium with shaking at 120 rpm. When needed, erythromycin was supplemented to media in concentrations of 5 μg/mL for Lactobacillus or 200 μg/mL for E. coli, whereas ampicillin was used at 100 μg/mL for E. coli.
Table 1. Strains and Plasmids Used for Cloning and Overexpression of the β-Galactosidase Gene lacZ from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricusa.
| strains and plasmids | relevant characteristics and purpose | ref |
|---|---|---|
| strains | ||
| L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081 | original source of lacZ | DSMZ |
| Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 | host strain, plasmid free | (42) |
| E. coli NEB5α | cloning host | New England Biolabs |
| plasmids | ||
| pJET1.2 | for subcloning and PCR fragment synthesis | Fermentas |
| pSIP403 | spp-based expression vector, pSIP401 derivative, Emr, gusA controlled by PsppA | (33) |
| pSIP409 | spp-based expression vector, pSIP401 derivative, Emr, gusA controlled by PsppQ | (33) |
| pTH101 | pSIP403 derivative, gusA replaced by lacZ | this study |
| pTH102 | pSIP403 derivative, gusA replaced by lacZ carrying C-terminal His6-tag | this study |
| pTH103 | pSIP409 derivative, gusA replaced by lacZ | this study |
| pTH104 | pSIP409 derivative, gusA replaced by lacZ carrying C-terminal His6-tag | this study |
Emr, erythromycin resistance; spp, sakacin P gene cluster; gusA, β-glucuronidase reporter gene; lacZ, β-galactosidase gene.
DNA Manipulation
Total DNA of L. bulgaricus DSMZ 20081 was isolated using chloroform extraction as described by Nguyen et al.24 with slight modifications. In short, cell pellets from 3 mL overnight cultures were resuspended and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in 400 μL of 1 mM Tris–EDTA buffer pH 8 (TE buffer) containing 50 μL of lysozyme (100 mg/mL) and 50 μL of mutanolysin (480 U/mL). The mixture was subsequently supplemented with 50 μL of 10% SDS and 10 μL of proteinase K (20 mg/mL) and incubated further at 60 °C for 1 h. After inactivation of proteinase K (at 75 °C for 15 min), 2 μL of RNase (2 mg/mL) was added to the mixture, and incubation was continued at 37 °C for 30 min. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified by using phenol–chloroform and precipitated with 3 M sodium acetate, pH 3.8, and ice-cold isopropanol. The DNA precipitate was washed with cold (−20 °C) 70% ethanol, and the dried DNA pellets were dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer, pH 7.5, at room temperature with gentle shaking.
The primers used for PCR amplification of lacZ from the genomic DNA of L. bulgaricus DSM 20081 (NCBI reference sequence no. NC_008054)23 were supplied by VBC-Biotech Service (Vienna, Austria) and are listed in Table 2. The appropriate endonuclease restriction sites were introduced in the forward and reverse primers as indicated. DNA amplification was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) as recommended by the supplier and using standard procedures.25 The amplified PCR products were purified by the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up system kit (Promega, Madison, WI). When needed, the PCR fragments were subcloned into the pJET1.2 plasmid (CloneJET PCR cloning kit, Fermentas), and E. coli was used as a host for obtaining the plasmids in sufficient amounts before transformation into Lactobacillus. All PCR-generated inserts were confirmed by DNA sequencing performed by a commercial provider.
Table 2. Primers Used for Cloning of the β-Galactosidase Gene lacZ from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricusa.
| primer | restriction enzyme | sequence (5→3) | ref sequence accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | BsmBI | GCTGCGTCTCCCATGAGCAATAAGTTAGTAAAAG | NC_008054, GeneID: 4085367 |
| R1 | XhoI | CGCGCTCGAGTTATTTTAGTAAAAGGGGCTG | NC_008054, GeneID: 4085367 |
| R2 | XhoI | CGCGCTCGAGTTAGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGTTTTAGTAAAAGGGGC | NC_008054, GeneID: 4085367 |
Restriction sites are underlined; the His6-tag sequence is shown in italic.
Plasmid Construction and Transformation
Gene fragments of lacZ with or without the His6-tag were excised from the pJETlacZ plasmid using BsmBI and XhoI and ligated into the 5.6 kb NcoI–XhoI fragments of pSIP403 or pSIP409, resulting in the plasmids pTH101, pTH102, pTH103, and pTH104 (Table 1). The constructed plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent cells of L. plantarum WCFS1 according to the protocol of Aukrust and Blom.26
β-Galactosidase Assays
β-Galactosidase activity was determined using o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (oNPG) or lactose as the substrates, as described previously.6 In brief, these assays were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer of pH 6.5 at 30 °C, and the final substrate concentrations in the 10 min assays were 22 mM for oNPG and 575 mM for lactose. Protein concentrations were determined by using the method of Bradford with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard.
Expression of Recombinant β-Galactosidase
For the heterologous overexpression of the lacZ gene from L. bulgaricus, overnight cultures (∼16 h) of L. plantarum WCFS1 harboring the expression plasmid pTH101, pTH102, pTH103, or pTH104 were added to 15 mL of fresh MRS medium containing erythromycin to an OD600 of ∼0.1 and incubated at 30 °C without agitation. The cells were induced at an OD600 of 0.3 by adding 25 ng/mL of the inducing peptide pheromone IP-673 (supplied by the Molecular Biology Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K.). Cells were harvested at an OD600 of 1.8–2, washed twice by buffer P (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 20% w/v glycerol and 1 mM dithiothreitol),6 and resuspended in 0.5 mL of the same buffer. Cells were disrupted in a bead beating homogenizer using 1 g of glass bead (Precellys 24; PEQLAB, Germany). Cell-free extracts were obtained after a centrifugation step at 9000g for 15 min at 4 °C.
Fermentation and Protein Purification
L. plantarum WCFS1 harboring pTH101 or pTH102 was cultivated in 1 L fermentations to obtain sufficient material for purification of LacZ. The cultivation conditions and the induction protocol were identical to those of the small-scale cultivations. Expression of lacZ was induced at OD600 0.3, and the cells were harvested at OD600 ∼6. After centrifugation as above, cells were disrupted by using a French press (Aminco, Silver Spring, MD), and debris was removed by centrifugation (30000g, 20 min, 4 °C). The purification of the recombinant enzyme was performed by immobilized metal affinity chromatography using a Ni-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden)8 or substrate affinity chromatography (with the substrate analogue p-aminobenzyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside immobilized onto cross-linked 4% beaded agarose; Sigma) as previously described.6 Purified enzymes were stored in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at 4 °C.
Gel Electrophoresis, Gel Permeation Chromatography, and Activity Staining
Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and activity staining using 4-methylumbelliferyl β-d-galactoside (MUG) as the substrate were carried out as previously described6 using the Phast System with precast gels (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Gel permeation chromatography was performed on a Superose 12 column (16 × 1000 mm; GE Healthcare) using 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 150 mM NaCl, and with the Sigma Gel Filtration Molecular Markers Kit with standard proteins of 12–200 kDa. In addition, pyranose oxidase with a molecular mass of 250 kDa was used as a standard.27
Characterization of Recombinant β-Galactosidase
Steady-state kinetic data for the substrates lactose or oNPG were obtained at 30 °C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, with concentrations ranging from 0 to 600 mM for lactose and from 0 to 25 mM for oNPG. Furthermore, the inhibition of the hydrolytic activity of LacZ by d-glucose as well as d-galactose was investigated by adding these sugars into the assay mixture in concentrations ranging from 10 to 300 mM, and the respective inhibition constants were determined. The kinetic parameters and the inhibition constants were calculated using nonlinear regression, fitting the observed data to the Henri–Michaelis–Menten equation using SigmaPlot (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
The pH dependence of β-galactosidase activity was evaluated in the range of pH 3–10 using Britton–Robinson buffer (containing 20 mM each of phosphoric, acetic, and boric acid adjusted to the required pH with NaOH). The temperature dependence of β-galactosidase activity was assessed by measuring activity in the range of 20–90 °C for 10 min. The catalytic stability of β-galactosidase was determined by incubating the enzyme in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at various temperatures and by subsequent measurements of the remaining enzyme activity (A) at various time points (t) using the standard oNPG assay. Residual activities (At/A0, where At is the activity measured at time t and A0 is the initial activity) were plotted versus the incubation time. The inactivation constants kin were obtained by linear regression of ln(activity) versus time. The half-life values of thermal inactivation τ1/2 were calculated using τ1/2 = ln 2/kin.28
To study the effect of various cations on β-galactosidase activity, the enzyme samples were assayed at 30 °C for 10 min with 22 mM oNPG (10 mM Bis-Tris, pH 6.5, or 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5) as the substrate in the presence of various cations added in final concentrations of 1–50 mM. The measured activities were compared with the activity blank of the enzyme solution determined under identical conditions but without added cations using the standard oNPG assay. Unless otherwise stated, the nontagged enzyme LacZ was used for these characterization experiments.
Lactose Hydrolysis and Transgalactosylation
The synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides (GalOS) was carried out in discontinuous mode using purified recombinant, nontagged β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus (1.5 lactase U/mL of reaction mixture). Reaction conditions were 600 mM initial lactose concentration in sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5) containing 10 mM MgCl2; the incubation temperature was varied from 30 to 50 °C. Continuous agitation was applied at 300 rpm. Samples were withdrawn periodically, and the composition of the GalOS mixture was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis and high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD), following methods described previously.29 Individual GOS compounds were identified and quantified by using authentic standards and the standard addition technique.16,30
Statistical Analysis
All experiments and measurements were performed at least in duplicate, and the data are given as the mean ± standard deviation when appropriate. Student’s t test was used for the comparison of data.
Results and Discussion
Plasmid Construction and Expression of β-Galactosidase Derived from L. bulgaricus in L. plantarum
The yields of β-galactosidase activity when using the wild-type strain of L. bulgaricus as a producer are rather low; for example, β-galactosidase levels were only ∼4000 U of activity/L of medium (MRS containing 2% lactose) after cultivation at 37 °C for 24 h for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081. Hence we attempted heterologous overexpression in a food grade organism to obtain higher yields of this biotechnologically attractive enzyme, and we cloned the L. bulgaricus lacZ gene into the vectors pSIP403 and pSIP409, which differ only in their promoters.31−33 The four expression plasmids pTH101, pTH102, pTH103, and pTH104 were constructed by replacing gusA, which originally was used as a reporter gene in the pSIP plasmid series, by lacZ, both with and without a hexa-histidine tag (Table 1). In these vectors, the transcription of lacZ is regulated by the inducible promoters PsppA and PsppQ for the pSIP403 and pSIP409 derivatives, respectively (Figure 1). The expression of lacZ with the different vectors was subsequently studied in L. plantarum WCFS1 as host, using an inducer concentration of 25 ng/mL of the inducing peptide pheromone IP-673.25,31 Induced and noninduced cells were harvested in the late stationary phase (OD600 of 1.8–2.0), and the intracellular cell-free extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, which showed unique bands of ∼100 kDa in induced L. plantarum cells (Figure 2) and β-galactosidase activity assays (Table 3). Analysis of the crude cell extracts gave volumetric activities in the range of ∼15–23 U/mL of cultivation medium and specific activities of ∼160–200 U/mg (Table 3). The β-galactosidase activities in L. plantarum cells without plasmids were diminishing (0.002 U/mL and 0.07 U/mg), and hence the enzyme activities obtained can be attributed solely to the plasmid-encoded LacZ from L. bulgaricus. The choice of the PsppA promoter (pSIP403 derivatives) or PsppQ promoter (pSIP409 derivatives) did not affect the levels of β-galactosidase activity, because expression yields were well comparable and statistically not different for these constructs.
Figure 1.

Schematic overview of the pTH plasmids developed in this study. The structural gene lacZ (with or without a hexa-histidine tag) is controlled by the inducible promoters PsppA (pSIP403 derivatives) or PsppQ (pSIP409 derivatives). PsppIP controls the structural genes of the two-component regulatory system, sppK, a histidine kinase, and sppR, a response regulator. Ery indicates the erythromycin resistance marker, and transcriptional terminators are marked by lollypop structures.
Figure 2.
SDS-PAGE analysis of cell-free extracts of noninduced (A) and induced cells (B) of L. plantarum WCFS1 harboring pTH101 (lanes 1A, 1B), pTH103 (lanes 2A, 2B), pTH104 (lanes 3A, 3B), and pTH102 (lanes 5A, 5B). Lane 4 shows the Precision Plus Protein standard (Bio-Rad). The gel was stained with Coomassie blue.
Table 3. β-Galactosidase Activity in Cell-free Extracts of Induced and Noninduced Cells of L. plantarum WCFS1 Carrying Various Expression Plasmidsa.
| volumetric activity (U/mL fermentation broth) |
specific activity
(U/mg protein) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plasmid | induced | noninduced | induced | noninduced | induction factorb |
| pTH101 | 22.5 ± 0.8 | 1.50 ± 0.04 | 196 ± 3 | 10.3 ± 1.1 | 19 |
| pTH102 | 15.5 ± 0.6 | 1.62 ± 0.13 | 158 ± 3 | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 13 |
| pTH103 | 22.0 ± 1.3 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 193 ± 10 | 4.11 ± 0.18 | 47 |
| pTH104 | 18.0 ± 0.5 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 168 ± 4 | 3.43 ± 0.13 | 49 |
Data are expressed as the average ± standard deviation of three independent cultivations. The specific β-galactosidase activity in cell-free extracts of nontransformed L. plantarum was 0.07 U/mg.
The induction factors are calculated from the specific β-galactosidase activity obtained under inducing conditions divided by the activity under noninduced conditions in cells harvested at OD600 of 1.8–2.0.
Noninduced cells of L. plantarum harboring the various expression vectors were also cultivated and tested for basal expression (“leakage”) from the promoters (Table 3). Cells carrying pSIP409-derived vectors containing PsppQ show significantly lower basal activities than cells harboring pSIP403-derived vectors based on PsppA. As a consequence, the highest induction factors, that is, the quotient of specific activity obtained for induced and noninduced cells, of roughly 50 were found for the constructs pTH103 and pTH104 carrying PsppQ as the promoter.
Interestingly, the activities obtained for His-tagged LacZ were always significantly lower by approximately 20–30% despite both protein versions being produced in comparable levels as judged by SDS-PAGE analysis. The reduced activity is most probably caused by the C-terminal His-tag, because specific activities determined for purified, homogeneous nontagged and His-tagged LacZ (306 and 251 U/mg) also differ by ∼20%. The exact mechanism of how the His-tag interferes with the activity is, however, not known.
Fermentation and Purification of Recombinant β-Galactosidase LacZ
L. plantarum harboring pTH101 or pTH102 was cultivated on a larger scale (1 L cultivation volume), and gene expression was induced in accordance with the previous experiments. Typical yields obtained in 1 L laboratory cultivations were approximately 7.5 ± 0.5 g wet biomass and 53 ± 2 kU of nontagged (pTH101) and 43 ± 2 kU of His-tagged (pTH102) β-galactosidase activity. As judged from the specific activity of the crude cell extract (193 U/mg for nontagged LacZ) and that of the purified enzyme, 63% of the total soluble intracellular protein in L. plantarum amounts to the heterologously expressed protein, which was produced at levels of ∼170 mg recombinant protein/L of medium.
The recombinant enzymes were purified to apparent homogeneity from cell extracts by single-step purification protocols using either substrate affinity or immobilized metal affinity chromatography. The specific activity of the purified recombinant enzymes was 306 U/mg for wild-type, nontagged LacZ and 251 U/mg for His-tagged LacZ, respectively, when using the standard oNPG assay. Both purification procedures yielded homogeneous β-galactosidase as judged by SDS-PAGE (Figure 3A).
Figure 3.
Electrophoretic analysis of purified recombinant β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus: (A) SDS-PAGE (lanes: 1, Precision plus Protein standard ladder (Bio-Rad); 2, purified recombinant enzyme); (B) native-PAGE (lanes: 3, activity staining of β-galactosidase using 4-methylumbelliferyl β-d-galactoside as substrate; 4, purified β-galactosidase; 5, high molecular mass protein ladder (GE Healthcare)).
Molecular Characterization of the lacZ Gene Product, β-Galactosidase LacZ
β-Galactosidase from L. bulgaricus is a homodimer, consisting of two identical subunits of ∼115 kDa, as judged by denaturing SDS-PAGE (molecular mass of ∼115 kDa as judged by comparison with reference proteins; Figure 3A) and native PAGE (molecular mass of ∼200 kDa; Figure 3B). Gel permeation chromatography and comparison with protein standards of known mass gave a molecular mass of 230 kDa for native LacZ. This is in good agreement with the calculated molecular mass of 114 047 Da deduced for the LacZ subunit from its sequence. Activity staining directly on the native PAGE gel using 4-methylumbelliferyl β-galactoside as the substrate indicated furthermore that the protein band of ∼200 kDa indeed shows β-galactosidase activity (Figure 3B).
Enzyme Kinetics
The steady-state kinetic constants for the hydrolysis of the natural substrate lactose as well as for the artificial substrate o-nitrophenol β-d-galactopyranoside (oNPG) together with the inhibition constants for both end products, d-galactose and d-glucose, for β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus are summarized in Table 4. The kcat values were calculated on the basis of the theoretical vmax values experimentally determined by nonlinear regression and using a molecular mass of 114 kDa for the catalytically active subunit (115 kDa for His-tagged LacZ). β-Galactosidase from L. bulgaricus is not inhibited by its substrates lactose in concentrations of up to 600 mM or oNPG in concentrations of up to 25 mM as is evident from the Michaelis–Menten plots (not shown). The hydrolysis end products d-galactose and d-glucose competitively inhibit the hydrolytic activity of β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus, albeit this inhibition of, for example, d-galactose on cleavage of the natural substrate lactose is only moderate as is evident from the ratio of the Michaelis constant for lactose and the inhibition constant for d-galactose (Ki,Gal/Km,Lac = 3.7). The inhibition by d-glucose is even less pronounced as is obvious from the high inhibition constant measured for the hydrolysis of oNPG and the high ratio of Ki to Km for this reaction (Ki,Glc/Km,oNPG = 134).
Table 4. Kinetic Parameters for Recombinant β-Galactosidase LacZ from L. bulgaricus, both Nontagged and C-Terminally His-Tagged, for the Hydrolysis of Lactose and o-Nitrophenyl β-d-Galactopyranoside (oNPG).
| substrate | method for determination of enzyme activity | kinetic parametera | nontagged LacZ | His-tagged LacZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lactose | release of d-glucose | vmax,Glc (μmol min–1 mg–1) | 123 ± 5 | 111 ± 4 |
| Km,Lac (mM) | 19.2 ± 3.8 | 19.9 ± 3.8 | ||
| kcat (s–1) | 234 ± 13 | 211 ± 10 | ||
| kcat/Km(M–1 s–1) | 12300 | 10600 | ||
| Ki,Gal (mM) | 70.7 ± 16.8 | nd | ||
| oNPG | release of oNP | vmax,oNP (μmol min–1 mg–1) | 317 ± 6 | 257 ± 5 |
| Km,oNPG (mM) | 0.919 ± 0.088 | 1.20 ± 0.11 | ||
| kcat (s–1) | 603 ± 15 | 492 ± 13 | ||
| kcat/Km(M–1 s–1) | 655000 | 410000 | ||
| Ki,Glc (mM) | 123 ± 9 | nd | ||
| Ki,Gal (mM) | 9.52 ± 1.54 | nd | ||
Molecular masses of 114 and 115 kDa were used to calculate kcat from vmax for native and His-tagged LacZ, respectively.
Effect of Metal Ions on Enzyme Activity
Various mono- and divalent metal ions were tested with respect to a possible stimulating or inhibitory effect on β-galactosidase activity. These were added in final concentrations of 1–50 mM to the enzyme in Bis-Tris buffer (Table 5). The monovalent cations K+ and especially Na+ activated β-galactosidase activity when using this buffer system considerably; for example, an almost 12-fold increase in activity was found in the presence of 50 mM Na+ compared to a blank where no metal ion was added to the enzyme sample. When using the standard 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, K+ only resulted in a slight activation of approximately 1.4-fold when added in 10 mM concentrations. The divalent cations Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ showed an inhibitory effect when using Bis-Tris buffer, and especially the latter cation inhibited β-galactosidase activity strongly (Table 5). Interestingly, when using 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer instead of Bis-Tris buffer, Mg2+ showed an activating effect (150% relative activity) at concentrations of 1 and 10 mM; this could indicate a synergistic effect with Na+ present in this buffer.14
Table 5. Effect of Cations on Activity of β-Galactosidase in 10 mM Bis-Tris Buffer, pH 6.5a.
| relative activity
(%) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| cation | 1 mM | 10 mM | 50 mM |
| blank (none) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Na+ | 722 | 1030 | 1190 |
| K+ | 365 | 536 | 507 |
| Mg2+ | 85 | 31 | ndb |
| Ca2+ | 77 | 38 | nd |
| Zn2+ | 3 | 0.55 | nd |
Enzyme activity was determined under standard assay conditions in 10 mM Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5, using oNPG as the substrate with the respective cation added to give the stated final concentration. Experiments were performed in duplicates, and the standard deviation was always <5%.
nd, not determined.
Effect of Temperature and pH on Enzyme Activity and Stability
The temperature optima of the activity of β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus are 45–50 and 55–60 °C for oNPG and lactose hydrolysis, respectively, when using the 10 min assay (Figure 4A). The pH optimum of LacZ activity is pH 7.5 for both substrates lactose and oNPG (Figure 4B). Overall, the pH curves show a broad peak with 75% of maximal β-galactosidase activity in the pH range of 6–9 (Figure 4B). Catalytic stability, that is, the length of time the enzyme remains active before undergoing irreversible inactivation, of β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus was measured at a constant pH of 7.0 while the temperature was varied from 37 to 60 °C. In addition, we tested the effect of different buffers and the addition of cations on stability. LacZ activity showed first-order inactivation kinetics when analyzed in the plot of ln(residual activity) versus time (not shown). Data for the inactivation constants kin and half-life times of activity τ1/2 are summarized in Table 6. Regardless of the temperature, stability was comparable in phosphate buffer without added cation and Bis-Tris buffer containing 10 mM Na+, the metal ion that was found to increase activity significantly. Addition of 10 mM Mg2+ to phosphate buffer increased the stability considerably. Under these conditions, L. bulgaricus LacZ was well stable at 50 °C with a half-life time of >1 day. When the temperature was increased to 60 °C, activity was, however, lost rapidly (Table 6). This effect of ions such as Mg2+ on stability and activity seems common among GH2 β-galactosidases and is also observed for E. coli β-galactosidase LacZ34,35 as well as for some β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus spp. of the LacLM type.6,8 Several metal-binding sites were identified in the structure of E. coli LacZ, some of which are located in the direct vicinity of the active site. These ions are thought to take directly part in the catalytic mechanism and also to contribute to subunit interaction and hence stabilization of E. coli LacZ.34,35
Figure 4.
Temperature and pH optima of the activity of recombinant β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus: (○) lactose as substrate; (●) oNPG as substrate. Relative activities are given in comparison with the maximum activities measured under optimal conditions (100%), which were 412 and 237 U/mL with oNPG and lactose as the substrate, respectively, when determining the temperature optimum (A) and 680 and 106 U/mL with oNPG and lactose as the substrate, respectively, for the pH dependence of activity (B).
Table 6. Catalytic Stability of Recombinant β-Galactosidase from L. bulgaricusa.
| sodium
phosphate buffer, pH 7 |
sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7 + 10 mM Mg2+ |
Bis-Tris buffer, pH 7 + 10 mM Na+ |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| temperature (°C) |
kin (h–1) |
τ1/2 (h) |
kin (h–1) |
τ1/2 (h) |
kin (h–1) |
τ1/2 (h) |
| 37 | 0.0053 | 145 | 0.0016 | 345 | 0.0084 | 82.5 |
| 50 | 0.925 | 0.75 | 0.026 | 26 | 1.12 | 0.62 |
| 60 | 15.3 | 0.045 | 1.0 | 0.32 | 16.9 | 0.041 |
The inactivation constant kin and half-life time of activity τ1/2 were calculated at different temperatures and reaction conditions. Buffer concentrations were 50 mM each. Experiments were performed in duplicates, and the standard deviation was always <5%.
Lactose Transformation and Synthesis of Galacto-oligosaccharides
The transgalactosylation activity of L. bulgaricus LacZ has been described before,36−38 but has not been studied in much detail; for example, the structures of the main transferase products have not been identified. Lactose conversion and product formation of a typical LacZ-catalyzed reaction, using an initial lactose concentration of 600 mM (205 g/L) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer with 10 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5, and 1.5 Ulactose/mL of β-galactosidase activity at 30 °C, are shown in Figure 5A. During the initial reaction phase, galacto-oligosaccharides (GalOS) are the main reaction products, which are formed together with the primary hydrolysis products d-galactose and d-glucose. The concentration of total GalOS reached a maximum of 102 g/L after 12 h of reaction, when 90% of initial lactose was converted; this corresponds to a yield of almost 50% GalOS. Thereafter, the concentration of GalOS decreased because they are also hydrolyzed by the β-galactosidase. This breakdown of GalOS, however, proceeds only slowly, most probably because of end product inhibition by d-galactose, which at this point of the reaction is present in notable concentrations, and only approximately 10% of total GalOS are degraded when the reaction proceeds for another 12 h. A detailed analysis of the main transferase products formed is given in Figure 5B. Up to ∼90% lactose conversion, the amount of total GalOS, expressed by their relative concentration (percentage of GalOS of total sugars in the reaction mixture) was increasing almost linearly. At the beginning of the reaction, the trisaccharides β-d-Galp-(1→6)-Lac and β-d-Galp-(1→3)-Lac were formed predominately. With further progress of the reaction, the concentrations of d-galactose and d-glucose increased steadily, and these monosaccharides became important acceptors for the transferase reaction; hence, disaccharides other than lactose are formed as well. Non-lactose disaccharides were prevailing by weight at around 75% lactose conversion and later, with β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Glc (allolactose) and β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Glc as the two main products. In addition to these main GalOS components, β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Gal and β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Gal were identified in the reaction mixtures; these were, however, minor constituents. GalOS containing new β-(1→4) linkages could not be identified in these mixtures. β-Galactosidase from L. bulgaricus formed GalOS structurally similar to those obtained with other β-galactosidases from LAB,7,9,15,16,39 yet proportions of individual components varied to some extent. The predominant oligosaccharide products were identified as β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Glc (allolactose) and β-d-Galp-(1→6)-Lac, together accounting for approximately 60% of the GalOS, indicating that this β-galactosidase has a propensity to synthesize β-(1→6)-linked GalOS.
Figure 5.
Composition of the sugar mixture during lactose conversion by recombinant β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus. The reaction was carried out at 30 °C with an initial concentration of 600 mM lactose in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 using ∼1.5 Ulactose/mL of enzyme. (A) Time course of the conversion: (+), lactose; (●), glucose; (○), galactose; (▼) total galacto-oligosaccharides (GalOS). (B) Composition of the sugar mixture and individual GalOS components at different degrees of lactose conversion: (●), glucose; (○), galactose; (▼) total (GalOS); (⧫), β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Glc; (■), β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Gal; (◇), β-d-Galp-(1→3)-Lac; (△), β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Glc; (□), β-d-Galp-(1→6)-Lac; (◆), unidentified GalOS. Monosaccharides were measured enzymatically, lactose and GalOS were quantified by HPAEC-PAD and CE. Individual sugars are given as the percentage of total sugars (205 g/L) in the mixture.
To examine whether the high thermostability of L. bulgaricus LacZ can be exploited for GalOS synthesis, we also ran the lactose conversion experiments at higher temperatures, that is, 40 and 50 °C, using otherwise identical conditions. Table 7 lists these results for a comparable degree of lactose conversion of ∼90%. The reaction mixture showed a very similar composition regardless of the reaction temperature. However, the time needed to obtain 90% lactose conversion was reduced, from 12 h of reaction time at 30 °C to 8 h at 40 °C and only 5 h at 50 °C, and therefore the productivity increased from 8.5 to 19.8 g L–1 h–1 GalOS for the LacZ-catalyzed reaction at the highest temperature tested. It is interesting to note that the reaction temperature hardly affected the maximum GalOS yield or the composition of the GalOS mixture. Several studies have shown that transgalactosylation becomes more pronounced compared to hydrolysis at higher temperatures.40,41
Table 7. Oligosaccharide Components (% w/w of Total Sugar) of GalOS Mixtures Obtained with β-Galactosidase of L. bulgaricus at Three Different Temperaturesa.
| reaction
temperature |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| GalOS component | 30 °C | 40 °C | 50 °C |
| glucose | 28.7 | 31.0 | 32.5 |
| galactose | 11.9 | 13.5 | 14.2 |
| total GOS | 49.5 | 48.7 | 48.2 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Gal | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-Glc | 3.8 | 4 | 3.9 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→3)-Lac | 5.6 | 5.1 | 4.5 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Gal | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-Glc | 17.1 | 15.5 | 15 |
| β-d-Galp-(1→6)-Lac | 12.5 | 12.5 | 13.2 |
| unknown OS | 8.9 | 9.7 | 9.9 |
| lactose conversion | 90.1b | 93.2c | 94.9d |
A lactose concentration of 600 mM (205 g/L) and 1.5 U/mL of β-galactosidase activity (determined with lactose as substrate under standard assay conditions) were used in each experiment. Data are given for the maximal yields obtained during the course of the reaction. Experiments were performed in duplicate, and the standard deviation was always <5%.
At 12 h.
At 8 h.
At 5 h.
In conclusion, the properties of β-galactosidase LacZ from L. bulgaricus differ in some important aspects from those of lactobacillal β-galactosidases of the LacLM type. Its high activity, modest inhibition by the end product d-galactose, and high transgalactosylation activity together with its thermostability make this enzyme an attractive biocatalyst for various food-related applications.
Glossary
Abbreviations used
- CAZy
Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database
- CE
capillary electrophoresis
- DTT
1,4-dithiothreitol
- GalOS
galacto-oligosaccharides
- GOD
glucose oxidase
- HPAEC-PAD
high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection
- Lac
lactose
- MUG
4-methylumbelliferyl β-d-galactoside
- oNP
o-nitrophenol
- oNPG
o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside
- PMSF
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride.
Author Contributions
∥ T.-T.N. and H.A.N contributed equally to this work.
T.-T.N., H.A.N., and S.L.A. thank the ASEAN–European University Network ASEA–Uninet, the Austrian government, and the Austrian Academic Exchange Service ÖAD for a Technology Southeast Asia Grant. This research was funded in part by the doctoral program “BioToP - Biomolecular Technology of Proteins” (Austrian Science Funds, FWF Project W1224).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Giraffa G.; Chanishvili N.; Widyastuti Y. Importance of lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 480–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leroy F.; De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson R. K.Yoghurt, role of starter cultures. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Roginski H., Fuquay J. W., Fox P. F., Eds.; Academic Press: London, U.K., 2003; Vol. 2, pp 1059–1063. [Google Scholar]
- Lapierre L.; Mollet B.; Germond J.-E. Regulation and adaptive evolution of lactose operon expression in Lactobacillus delbrueckii. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 928–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cantarel B. L.; Coutinho P. M.; Rancurel C.; Bernard T.; Lombard V.; Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen T.-H.; Splechtna B.; Steinböck M.; Kneifel W.; Lettner H. P.; Kulbe K. D.; Haltrich D. Purification and characterization of two novel β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4989–4998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen T.-H.; Splechtna B.; Krasteva S.; Kneifel W.; Kulbe K. D.; Divne C.; Haltrich D. Characterization and molecular cloning of a heterodimeric β-galactosidase from the probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus R22. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 269, 136–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maischberger T.; Leitner E.; Nitisinprasert S.; Juajun O.; Yamabhai M.; Nguyen T. H.; Haltrich D. β-Galactosidase from Lactobacillus pentosus: purification, characterization and formation of galacto-oligosaccharides. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 838–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal S.; Nguyen T.-H.; Nguyen T. T.; Maischberger T.; Haltrich D. β-Galactosidase from Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1: biochemical characterization and formation of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 1408–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal S.; Nguyen T.-H.; Nguyen H. A.; Nguyen T. T.; Maischberger T.; Kittl R.; Haltrich D. Characterization of a heterodimeric GH2 β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus sakei Lb790 and formation of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3803–3811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaillancourt K.; Moineau S.; Frenette M.; Lessard C.; Vadeboncoeur C. Galactose and lactose genes from the galactose-positive bacterium Streptococcus salivarius and the phylogenetically related galactose-negative bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus: organization, sequence, transcription, and activity of the gal gene products. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 785–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goulas T. K.; Goulas A. K.; Tzortzis G.; Gibson G. R. Molecular cloning and comparative analysis of four β-galactosidase genes from Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB41171. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 1365–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hung M. N.; Xia Z.; Hu N. T.; Lee B. H. Molecular and biochemical analysis of two β-galactosidases from Bifidobacterium infantis HL96. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4256–4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama T.; Amachi T.. β-Galactosidase, enzymology. In Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation; Flickinger M. C., Drew S. W., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1999; Vol. 3, pp 1291–1305. [Google Scholar]
- Gosling A.; Stevens G. W.; Barber A. R.; Kentish S. E.; Gras S. L. Recent advances refining galactooligosaccharide production from lactose. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 307–318. [Google Scholar]
- Splechtna B.; Nguyen T.-H.; Steinböck M.; Kulbe K. D.; Lorenz W.; Haltrich D. Production of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides from lactose using β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4999–5006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson G. R.; Probert H. M.; Loo J. V.; Rastall R. A.; Roberfroid M. B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2004, 17, 259–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park A. R.; Oh D. K. Galacto-oligosaccharide production using microbial β-galactosidase: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1279–1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabiu B. A.; Jay A. J.; Gibson G. R.; Rastall R. A. Synthesis and fermentation properties of novel galacto-oligosaccharides by β-galactosidases from Bifidobacterium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2526–2530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tzortzis G.; Goulas A. K.; Gibson G. R. Synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides using whole cells of a novel strain, Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 412–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rastall R. A.; Maitin V. Prebiotics and synbiotics: towards the next generation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 490–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleerebezem M.; Vaughan E. E. Probiotic and gut lactobacilli and bifidobacteria: molecular approaches to study diversity and activity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 269–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van de Guchte M.; et al. The complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus bulgaricus reveals extensive and ongoing reductive evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 9274–9279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen T.-H.; Splechtna B.; Yamabhai M.; Haltrich D.; Peterbauer C. Cloning and expression of the β-galactosidase genes from Lactobacillus reuteri in Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 129, 581–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halbmayr E.; Mathiesen G.; Nguyen T.-H.; Maischberger T.; Peterbauer C. K.; Eijsink V. G.; Haltrich D. High-level expression of recombinant β-galactosidases in Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus sakei using a Sakacin P-based expression system. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4710–4719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aukrust T.; Blom H. Transformation of Lactobacillus strains used in meat and vegetable fermentations. Food Res. Int. 1992, 25, 253–261. [Google Scholar]
- Hallberg B. M.; Leitner C.; Haltrich D.; Divne C. Crystal structure of the 270 kDa homotetrameric lignin-degrading enzyme pyranose 2-oxidase. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 341, 781–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polizzi K. M.; Bommarius A. S.; Broering J. M.; Chaparro-Riggers J. F. Stability of biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11, 220–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Splechtna B.; Nguyen T.-H.; Haltrich D. Comparison between discontinuous and continuous lactose conversion processes for the production of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides using β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 6772–6777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Splechtna B.; Nguyen T.-H.; Zehetner R.; Lettner H. P.; Lorenz W.; Haltrich D. Process development for the production of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides from lactose using β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus sp. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2, 480–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathiesen G.; Sørvig E.; Blatny J.; Naterstad K.; Axelsson L.; Eijsink V. G. High-level gene expression in Lactobacillus plantarum using a pheromone-regulated bacteriocin promoter. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 39, 137–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sørvig E.; Gronqvist S.; Naterstad K.; Mathiesen G.; Eijsink V. G.; Axelsson L. Construction of vectors for inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and L. plantarum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 229, 119–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sørvig E.; Mathiesen G.; Naterstad K.; Eijsink V. G.; Axelsson L. High-level, inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus plantarum using versatile expression vectors. Microbiology 2005, 151, 2439–2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards R. A.; Jacobson A. L.; Huber R. E. Thermal denaturation of β-galactosidase and of two site-specific mutants. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 11001–11008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juers D. H.; Rob B.; Dugdale M. L.; Rahimzadeh N.; Giang C.; Lee M.; Matthews B. W.; Huber R. E. Direct and indirect roles of His-418 in metal binding and in the activity of β-galactosidase (E. coli). Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 1281–1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garman J.; Coolbear T.; Smart J. The effect of cations on the hydrolysis of lactose and the transferase reactions catalysed by β-galactosidase from six strains of lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 46, 22–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Itoh T.; Ohhashi M.; Toba T.; Adachi S. Purification and properties of β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Milchwissenschaft 1980, 35, 593–597. [Google Scholar]
- Vasiljevic T.; Jelen P. Oligosaccharide production and proteolysis during lactose hydrolysis using crude cellular extracts from lactic acid bacteria. Lait 2003, 83, 453–467. [Google Scholar]
- Schwab C.; Sørensen K. I.; Gänzle M. G. Heterologous expression of glycoside hydrolase family 2 and 42 β-galactosidases of lactic acid bacteria in Lactococcus lactis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 300–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu C. A.; Lee S. L.; Chou C. C. Enzymatic production of galactooligosaccharides by β-galactosidase from Bifidobacterium longum BCRC 15708. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 2225–2230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osman A.; Tzortzis G.; Rastall R. A.; Charalampopoulos D. A comprehensive investigation of the synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides by whole cells of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 150, 140–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleerebezem M.; et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 1990–1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




