This is one of two papers in this issue to identify and characterize the enzyme responsible for N1-methylation of pseudouridine 54 in archaeal tRNAs. The recombinant methyltransferase is shown to have specificity for the sequence context of the single pseudouridine that is modified, expanding the structure/function analysis of this important family of RNA modification enzymes.
Keywords: tRNA modification, tRNA methylation, Haloferax volcanii, TrmY, Archaea
Abstract
The methylation of pseudouridine (Ψ) at position 54 of tRNA, producing m1Ψ, is a hallmark of many archaeal species, but the specific methylase involved in the formation of this modification had yet to be characterized. A comparative genomics analysis had previously identified COG1901 (DUF358), part of the SPOUT superfamily, as a candidate for this missing methylase family. To test this prediction, the COG1901 encoding gene, HVO_1989, was deleted from the Haloferax volcanii genome. Analyses of modified base contents indicated that while m1Ψ was present in tRNA extracted from the wild-type strain, it was absent from tRNA extracted from the mutant strain. Expression of the gene encoding COG1901 from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, VNG1980C, complemented the m1Ψ minus phenotype of the ΔHVO_1989 strain. This in vivo validation was extended with in vitro tests. Using the COG1901 recombinant enzyme from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (Mj1640), purified enzyme Pus10 from M. jannaschii and full-size tRNA transcripts or TΨ-arm (17-mer) fragments as substrates, the sequential pathway of m1Ψ54 formation in Archaea was reconstituted. The methylation reaction is AdoMet dependent. The efficiency of the methylase reaction depended on the identity of the residue at position 55 of the TΨ-loop. The presence of Ψ55 allowed the efficient conversion of Ψ54 to m1Ψ54, whereas in the presence of C55, the reaction was rather inefficient and no methylation reaction occurred if a purine was present at this position. These results led to renaming the Archaeal COG1901 members as TrmY proteins.
INTRODUCTION
Transfer RNAs in all three domains of life contain a large variety of characteristic post-transcriptionally modified nucleosides. Among them pseudouridine, an isomer of uridine (abbreviated Ψ) and base or ribose methylations (mN, or Nm respectively; N being any of the four bases A, U, C, or G) are by far the most abundant (all listed in Czerwoniec et al. 2009; Cantara et al. 2011) (for review, see Grosjean 2009; Motorin and Helm 2011). Many of these noncanonical nucleotides are highly conserved at specific sites in functionally important parts of tRNA molecules. For example Ψ, m5U (riboT), or m1Ψ are nearly always found at position 54 in the so-called TΨ-loop at the elbow of the L-shaped tRNA molecules, while Ψ is found at the neighboring position 55. The conservation of these modifications at these two positions is certainly due to essential structural roles. Indeed, the presence of Ψ55 reinforces tertiary base-pairing with the conserved G18, favors intra-loop stacking with the conserved purine at position 57 and with the neighboring m5U54/m1Ψ54 engaged in a reverse-Hoogsteen pair with the conserved A58 (Romby et al. 1987). Together with the conserved tertiary pair C56-G19 between the TΨ-loop and D-loop, this “ensemble” of conserved interacting nucleotides allows crucial interactions that form a stable “tertiary core” and, hence, the canonical tRNA L-shape architecture (Kotlova et al. 2007 and references therein). In agreement with this “locking” function of both Ψ55 and m5U54 (probably also m1Ψ54 in archaeal tRNAs, see below), these base modifications are among the earliest to appear during the complex tRNA maturation process (Nishikura and De Robertis 1981; Grosjean et al. 1996).
Even if the modifications at position 54 and 55 are conserved and have critical structural roles, strains lacking these modifications are viable. A mutant of Escherichia coli deleted in the truB gene (encoding for the Ψ55 producing enzyme) grew normally on all media tested (Gutgsell et al. 2000). It did exhibit a competitive disadvantage in extended co-culture with its wild-type progenitor and a defect in surviving rapid transfers from 37°C to 50°C (Gutgsell et al. 2000). Moreover, combining truB mutations with mutations affecting the catalytic activity of TrmA, the enzyme catalyzing the formation of the adjacent m5U54, further increased the temperature sensitivity phenotype (Kinghorn et al. 2002).
In the present work, we focus on the biosynthesis of 1-methylpseudouridine in tRNAs (m1Ψ54) (Fig. 1A). This Ψ derivative was first characterized from the bulk tRNA of archaeon Halococcus morrhuae (Pang et al. 1982). It has now been found in tRNAs isolated from many Archaea, mainly Euryarchaeota (Table 1). Its location at position 54 of tRNA was inferred from sequence analysis of 41 tRNAs from H. volcanii (Gupta 1984, 1986). In contrast, tRNA sequences from Thermoplasma acidophilum (two sequences), Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (one sequence), and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (one sequence) revealed the presence of a nonmethylated Ψ or a ribose-methylated U (Um) in place of m1Ψ54 (Cantara et al. 2011; http://www.uni-bayreuth.de/departments/biochemie/trna/). In tRNAs from Thermococcales (Pyrococcus furiosus and Pyrococcus abyssi), m5U54 or s2m5U54 are found instead of m1Ψ54 (Fig. 1A; Kowalak et al. 1994; Constantinesco et al. 1999). As previously noted (Gupta and Woese 1980; Pang et al. 1982), methyl groups on the uracil ring at tRNA position 54 in the two cases (N1 in m1Ψ and C5 in m5U) bear similar orientations with respect to the ribose and the polynucleotide chain and both methylated products have similar shapes. This could be an example of evolutionary convergence of structures (and probably of function).
TABLE 1.
Only the first step in m1Ψ formation in tRNA, the formation of Ψ54, has been elucidated with the recent characterization of the tRNA-Ψ54 synthase, Pus10 (Gurha and Gupta 2008). The enzyme responsible for the subsequent N1 methylation of the uracil ring of Ψ54 and the corresponding gene has yet to be identified. However, experiments with whole-cell extract of H. volcanii incubated with 32P-radiolabeled T7-transcript and AdoMet (SAM) showed enzymatic formation of m1Ψ54, indicating that the enzyme of interest was SAM dependent (Grosjean et al. 1995).
Nep1 (Nucleolar Essential Protein1, formerly named Emg1) from S. cerevisiae and Methanocaldococcus jannaschii was recently identified as a genuine SAM-dependent N1-pseudouridine methyltransferase (Wurm et al. 2010). This enzyme belongs to Cluster of Orthologous Group (COG) 1756 (Tatusov et al. 2003) and converts Ψ into m1Ψ in small synthetic fragments of 8, 9, or 11 nucleotides in length (GAUUCAACGCC, where the second of the two adjacent Us is Ψ) (Wurm et al. 2010). This motif corresponds to the sequence in helix 35 of SSU rRNA of S. cerevisiae as well as of M. jannaschii, where Nep1 tightly binds (Buchhaupt et al. 2006). Nep1 is responsible for the methylation step in the formation of the hypermodified 1-methyl-3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl) pseudouridine (m1acp3Ψ) found at position 1191 in helix 35 of yeast 18S rRNA and also has a role in ribosome assembly (Fig. 1B; Meyer et al. 2011; Thomas et al. 2011). These functions appear to be conserved in other eukaryotes (Brand et al. 1978; Youvan and Hearst 1981). Despite the obvious sequence analogy of the Nep1 target with the conserved sequence GUUCAANC/U (underlined, cf. target sequences in Fig. 1, A and B) present in nearly all tRNAs sequenced so far (Marck and Grosjean 2002), Nep1 is certainly not the missing tRNA N1-pseudouridine methyltransferase. The reasons are: (1) The genome of S. acidocaldarius contains a Nep1 homolog (Saci_0034), but its bulk tRNA lacks m1Ψ, and its only sequenced tRNA harbors Um54 (Table 1; Gupta and Woese 1980; Kuchino et al. 1982); (2) conversely, the genome of H. volcanii lacks the gene coding for Nep1, while nearly all of its tRNAs harbor m1Ψ54 (Table 1; Gupta 1984, 1986); (3) this absence is consistent with the fact that helix 35 of H. volcanii 16S rRNA harbors an acp3U and not the “hypermodified” m1acp3Ψ as in eukaryotes (Kowalak et al. 2000).
A better candidate for the missing m1Ψ54 methyltransferase came from a bioinformatics analysis of a large variety of orphan genes coding for putative AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases in genomes of microorganisms belonging to the three domains of life. This analysis identified one of the methyltransferases belonging to COG1901, encompassing an α/β knot fold (also named SPOUT) superfamily of methyltransferases as a valid candidate (Tkaczuk et al. 2007). This prediction fits with the observation that genes of this family usually cluster with pus10 in several archaeal genomes (Grosjean et al. 2008a). Lastly, the crystal structure of a COG1901 family member, Mj1640 from M. jannaschii, was solved in complex with AdoMet at 1.4 Å resolution (Chen and Yuan 2010). Mj1640 protein shares much structural similarity with the highly conserved eukaryotic nucleolar Emg1/Nep1 protein at its C-terminal half containing the conserved deep trefoil knot fold (Z-score 15.7, RMS 2.5 Å, 163 Cα). However, because of significant differences in N-terminal extension domain and overall surface charge distribution, it was suggested that the two proteins Nep1 and Mj1640 target different RNA sequences (Chen and Yuan 2010). This structural data greatly strengthened the prediction that the COG1901 (or DUF358) RNA methylase family was the missing tRNA-m1Ψ forming enzyme, and we set out to test this experimentally using both in vivo and in vitro assays. Here we show that a H. volcanii strain deleted in the COG1901 family gene HVO_1989 lacks m1Ψ in tRNA, and that in vitro Mj1640 catalyzes the formation of m1Ψ at position 54 on tRNA. These results led to the renaming of the Archaeal COG1901 proteins as TrmY (as Y is commonly used to represent Ψ) for tRNA(pseudouridine54-N1)-methyltransferase.
RESULTS
trmY is not essential in H. volcanii, but deletion of trmY leads to the absence of m1Ψ54 in H. volcanii tRNA
The H. volcanii trmY (COG1901 homolog, HVO_1989) was deleted using previously published methods (Allers et al. 2004). Deletion of trmY in this strain (VDC2376) was confirmed by PCR using two primer pairs, one designed to anneal outside the deleted fragment and the other within (Fig. 2A). trmY is therefore dispensable in H. volcanii. Deletion of trmY did not lead to any obvious phenotype when analyzing growth in rich or minimal liquid medium or on solid medium at 20, 30, 37, 44, and 50°C or with total salt concentrations ranging from 12% (1.812 M NaCl, 65.28 mM MgCl2, 63 mM MgSO4, and 41.64 mM KCl) to 25% (3.775 M NaCl, 136 mM MgCl2, 131.25 mM MgSO4, and 86.75 mM KCl) (compared with the standard YPC media with a final concentration of 18% salt; data not shown). To test whether TrmY was involved in m1Ψ formation, we first extracted bulk tRNA from VDC2376 (ΔtrmY) and H26 (the isogenic parent strain as wild type [WT]). The bulk tRNA preparations were enzymatically hydrolyzed with nuclease P1 and snake venom phosphodiesterase and dephosphorylated with alkaline phosphatase, and the ribonucleosides analyzed by LC/MS-MS as described previously (de Crécy-Lagard et al. 2010). The 259 m/z ion that corresponds to the protonated molecular weight (MH+) of m1Ψ was detected by MS at 13.36 min in the WT background, while no 259 m/z ion was detected in the ΔtrmY strain (Fig. 2B). The peak observed in the mutant strain and not in the WT strain between 14 and 14.5 min corresponds to background (see the differences in the intensity scales between the right and left panels). As in our set-up, the m1Ψ peak eluted as a trail of the U peak at 13–13.6 min and these two peaks were difficult to separate with a trailing peak most certainly corresponding to an unidentified modification remaining in the mutant strain, a two-dimensional thin layer chromatography (2D–TLC) method was used to better detect the m1Ψ modification. Also, to rescue the effects of the trmY deletion, a derivative of the ΔtrmY strain was created (VDC2604), which contained a plasmid-borne copy of the COG1901 encoding gene from Halobacterium sp. NRC1, VNG_1980C (Fig. 2A). The WT, ΔtrmY (VDC2376), and ΔtrmY+pHTrmY (VDC2604) strains were in vivo labeled with 32P. Total tRNA was isolated, digested by nuclease P1, and resolved by 2D–TLC. As shown in Figure 3A, radioactive m1Ψ spot is present in both WT and complemented strains but is absent from the ΔtrmY strain (VDC2376). Because m1Ψ is present only at position 54 in H. volcanii tRNAs (Gupta 1984, 1986), these results show that, at least in halophilic Archaea, COG1901 proteins (TrmY) are required for the formation of m1Ψ54 in tRNA.
Lack of TrmY in the ΔtrmY strain only affects methylation and not Ψ formation at position 54 of the tRNA. We used CMCT-primer extension reactions, which specifically allow the identification of Ψ at a particular position in RNA (Bakin and Ofengand 1998) to determine the presence of Ψ54 in ΔtrmY strain. As seen in Figure 3B, the Ψ-specific band (marked by an arrow) is present at position 54 of tRNA in the ΔtrmY strain, but not in the WT and complemented strains, as expected if m1Ψ54 and not Ψ54 is present in these last two strains. As expected, Ψ55-specific bands are present in all three strains. These results suggested that Pus10-mediated Ψ54 (and Ψ55) formation does not require the presence of TrmY activity.
M. jannaschii TrmY catalyzes the formation of m1Ψ54 in tRNA in vitro
The [α-32P]UTP-labeled tRNATrp substrate, generated by transcription of a plasmid carrying a synthetic H. volcanii tRNATrp lacking its intron, was first modified by purified recombinant M. jannaschii Pus10, thus converting U at both positions 54 and 55 to Ψ, as described before (Gurha and Gupta 2008). This in vitro pseudouridylated tRNATrp was used as a substrate for further enzymatic methylation by the recombinant M. jannaschii TrmY protein mostly prepared under renaturing conditions. The doubly modified RNA was then phenol extracted, digested with nuclease P1, and the resulting digested products analyzed by 2D–TLC. Autoradiographies of the TLC plates revealed the presence of a radiolabeled spot corresponding to pm1Ψ only when the tRNATrp transcript was first incubated with Pus10 and then with TrmY (Fig. 4B). When tRNATrp was treated with TrmY without pretreatment with Pus10 it did not show any pm1Ψ (data not shown). Nearest neighbor analyses using RNase T2 digestion on the same radiolabeled tRNA samples confirmed the presence of m1Ψp only in the tRNATrp incubated with both Pus10 and TrmY (Fig. 4C), attesting that within tRNATrp the m1Ψ residue was located on the 5′ side of a 32P-labeled-uridine residue. RNase T2 produces ribonucleotide 3′-monophosphates (Np), and in the process transfers labeled phosphate on the 5′ side of a residue in the RNA to the 3′ side of the preceding residue. In H. volcanii tRNATrp there is only one U residue (position 54) that precedes another U residue (position 55) (see Fig. 4A). Therefore, the m1Ψp observed in Figure 4C is obviously derived from the residue at position 54 of this RNA. Moreover, Ψp is absent in the rightmost panel of Figure 4C, indicating that the methylation reaction was nearly complete under our experimental conditions, i.e., all Ψ54 being converted into m1Ψ54. This methylation is AdoMet dependent, as it was not observed when AdoMet was omitted from the reaction mixture (data not shown). Similar methylations were obtained when H. volcanii elongator tRNAMet was used as substrate (Fig. 4D) instead of H. volcanii tRNATrp. This tRNAMet contains residues G58 and G60 instead of the conserved A58 and semiconserved pyrimidine-60 at these positions of the TΨ-loop (Fig. 4A).
Initial methylation reactions were done using proteins prepared under native conditions. However, additional AdoMet was not needed for methylation with this protein when the protein was in excess of the RNA. AdoMet had to be added to the reaction for complete conversion of Ψ54 to m1Ψ54 when the RNA was equal to or in molar excess of this protein. This was not unexpected, because the protein prepared under native conditions contains bound AdoMet (Chen and Yuan 2010). Furthermore, methylation by AdoMet-containing TrmY (under excess enzyme concentration) could be inhibited by addition of S-adenosyl-homocysteine, an inhibitor of SAM-dependent methyltransferases (data not shown). Similarity of results using proteins prepared under native and renaturing conditions suggested that AdoMet is not required for the stability of the recombinant protein.
M. jannaschii TrmY converts only tRNA Ψ54 and not Ψ55 to m1Ψ. This is shown by TLC analyses of RNase T2 digestion of [α-32P]CTP-labeled tRNATrp first incubated with Pus10 then with TrmY (Fig. 4E). Autoradiography of the TLC plate reveals the presence of labeled Ψp and the absence of m1Ψp, indicating that Ψ55 (preceding C56) is not converted to m1Ψ in this tRNA.
M. jannaschii TrmY can produce m1Ψ in just the TΨ-arm (stem–loop) of tRNA
Previously it was shown that M. jannaschii Pus10 can produce Ψ in the T-arm-Trp (Fig. 4A), a 17-base fragment of tRNATrp, at positions that correspond to positions 54 and 55 of tRNA (Gurha and Gupta 2008). The same pseudouridylated fragment and the equivalent fragment from tRNAMet (Fig. 4A) are both substrates for the M. jannaschii TrmY (Fig. 4F; data not shown). Methylation of Ψ in Pus10-treated T-arm-Trp occurs only at positions equivalent to 54 and not 55 of the tRNA (data not shown).
M. jannaschii TrmY requires Ψ55 (or possibly U55) in the tRNA to produce m1Ψ54
In a mutant tRNATrp, where U55 is changed to any other residue (C, A, or G), the U54 can still be converted to Ψ54 by M. jannaschii Pus10 (Gurha and Gupta 2008). However, Ψ54 of a mutant tRNATrp, where the U55 is changed to A55 (Fig. 4A), is not a substrate for M. jannaschii TrmY. Nuclease P1 digest of [α-32P]UTP-labeled transcript of this mutant tRNA does not show any pm1Ψ after treatment with TrmY (Fig. 4G). Similarly, a U-to-G change at position 55 did not lead to any m1Ψ formation (Fig. 4H), while a trace amount of pm1Ψ was observed when U55 was changed to C55 (Fig. 4I). These experiments suggest that the presence of Ψ55 (or possibly U55) in the tRNA is required for enzymatic methylation of the adjacent Ψ54 by TrmY to produce m1Ψ54. However, at present we cannot distinguish whether an unmodified U55 can substitute for the requirement of Ψ55, because Pus10 treatment of RNA converts both U54 and U55 in our substrates to Ψ (Gurha and Gupta 2008).
DISCUSSION
In the present work, by combining genetic and biochemical experiments, we showed that in at least two Euryarchaeota, H. volcanii, and M. jannaschii COG1901, genes encode the missing tRNA(pseudouridine54-N1)-methyltransferase or TrmY. This newly identified TrmY enzyme belongs to the SAM-dependent SPOUT super family of dimeric enzymes (Tkaczuk et al. 2007). The closest COG1901 homologs among SPOUT methyltransferase of known catalytic function is the newly identified dimeric Nep1 (COG1756) catalyzing the N1-methylation of Ψ (m1Ψ) in helix 35 of 18S rRNA of Eukarya and Archaea (Fig. 1B; Wurm et al. 2010). Hence, these two families represent yet another example of two closely related SPOUT subfamilies that target different RNA molecules (an rRNA and a tRNA).
M. jannaschii TrmY can produce m1Ψ54 in full-sized tRNAs as well as at the equivalent position in TΨ-stem–loop substrates (17-mer TΨ-arm of tRNA). Likewise, the tRNA:m5U54 methyltransferases of E. coli (TrmA or RumT), of S. cerevisiae (Trm2p), and of P. abyssi (PAB_0719, aTrmU54) can produce m5U54 in similar full-sized or truncated RNAs (Gu et al. 1996; Becker et al. 1997; Urbonavicius et al. 2008), suggesting a possibility of similar substrate recognition modes as described for E. coli TrmA (Alian et al. 2008) and archaeal TrmU54 (Walbott et al. 2008). However, archaeal TrmY can methylate Ψ54 in tRNA harboring G58 and G60 (Fig. 4A,D). This differs from the yeast Trm2p enzyme, which requires the presence of both A58 and a pyrimidine at position 60 to methylate its substrate (Becker et al. 1997). This specificity of yeast Trm2p probably depends on the formation of a reverse intra-loop Hoogsteen pair between U54 and A58 in the tRNAs (Becker et al. 1997). The M. jannaschii TrmY requires a Ψ (or possibly a U) at position 55 to efficiently methylate Ψ54. This is reminiscent of the requirements of the yeast Trm2p enzyme, where U55 cannot be replaced by any other residue (Becker et al. 1997). We could not determine whether the residue 3′ adjacent to the target Ψ residue needs to be Ψ or an unmodified U because of our experimental design, but in the case of the archaeal Nep1, it was shown that the 5′ adjacent residue to the target Ψ residue can be an unmodified U (Wurm et al. 2010).
In addition to M. jannaschii TrmY, high-resolution crystal structures of other SAM-dependent RNA methyltransferases, such as Nep1 of M. jannaschii and S. cerevisiae, TrmA and RumA both of E. coli, are known (Lee et al. 2005; Alian et al. 2008; Leulliot et al. 2008; Taylor et al. 2008; Thomas et al. 2011). Nep1 is an rRNA N1-Ψ methyltransferase, TrmA is a tRNA C5-m5U methyltransferase, whereas RumA is an rRNA C5-m5U methyltransferase. Structural analysis of these RNA methyltransferases reveals that TrmY and Nep1 belong to SPOUT family, whereas TrmA and RumA belong to Rossmann (α/β) fold. These two groups share fewer structural similarities, except for a somehow similar α/β fold for AdoMet and RNA substrate binding. Although TrmY and Nep1 share the same characteristic deep trefoil knot core, different structural domains/motifs extended from the deep trefoil knot core are observed. These extra domains/motifs are proposed to facilitate RNA substrate binding and/or selection. Similarly, TrmA and RumA share close structural similarity both in RNA binding and catalytic domains. However, significant structural differences of the extended loop linking the RNA-binding domain and the catalytic domain are observed, suggesting the functional role of this loop in substrate selection.
TrmY homologs are found in the majority of Euryarchaeota and in a few Crenoarchaeota. All Archaea that contain a TrmY homolog contain a Pus10 homolog (see the COG1901 Subsystem in the SEED database; http://pubseed.theseed.org/SubsysEditor.cgi?page=SubsystemOverview) consistent with our finding that the presence of Ψ at position 54 is a prerequisite to the formation of m1Ψ. The presence or absence of m1Ψ in archaeal tRNAs has been reported by different research groups over many years (Table 1). The presence of Ψ or m1Ψ correlates well with the presence and absence of Pus10 and TrmY, with the exception of the Thermococcales (Table 1). Despite the presence of both pus10 and trmY genes in their genomes (Table 1) (COG1901 Subsystem in the SEED database), m5U or s2T and not m1Ψ were formally identified in bulk tRNAs from Thermococcales (Fig. 1A; Table 1). Likewise, when a tRNA transcript specific for Phe, Asp, or Ile, lacking modifications, was incubated with AdoMet and cell extracts from P. furiosus or P. abyssi, m5U was almost quantitatively formed at position 54 of the TΨ-loop (Constantinesco et al. 1999; Urbonavicius et al. 2008). Under the same experimental conditions, U54 in the tRNAIle transcript was shown to be “doubly” modified into m1Ψ when incubated with cell extracts from H. volcanii (Grosjean et al. 1995). The enzyme responsible for the formation of m5U54 in P. abyssi was recently identified as PAB_0719 (aTrmU54) (Urbonavicius et al. 2008; Auxilien et al. 2011). This protein is a member of the COG2265 SAM-dependent, Rossmann-like RNA m5U methyltransferase family. Phylogenetic analysis showed that it has been acquired by lateral gene transfer of a bacterial RlmD gene responsible for the site-specific formation of m5U in 23S rRNA (position 1939 in E. coli). Thus, during evolution, the RlmD-like protein in P. abyssi (PAB_0719, aTrmU54) has changed target specificity from rRNA to tRNA. The question of the role of TrmY proteins in Thermococcales remains open. Are these still active as a tRNA m1Ψ methyltransferase, but in specific conditions that have escaped detection, or have they acquired another function? Further experimental work is required to address this issue.
Only a few sequenced Crenarchaeota encode both genes pus10 and trmY (COG1901 subsystem in the SEED database), these include Ignococcus hospitalis KIN4_1, Aeroyrum pernix K1, the Pyrobaculum species, and a few other (but not all) Thermoproteales. Indeed, m1Ψ54 was detected in bulk tRNAs extracted from two thermoproteales (Pyrobaculum islandicum and Thermoproteus neutrophilus) fitting with the genomic data (Table 1). The only other experimental data available for a Crenarchaeota is for S. acidocaldarius, where 2′-O-methyluridine at tRNA position 54 (Um54) was identified (Gupta and Woese 1980; Kuchino et al. 1982), there again fitting with the absence of both active Pus10 proteins and TrmY in Sulfolobales (Table 1).
While COG1901 is primarily found in Archaea, homologs are surprisingly found in most sequenced Vibrio genomes, in two Shewanella baltica strains (OS195 and OS185), two Photobacterium profundum strains (SS9 and 3TCK) and in Alcanivorax borkumensis SK2 (Fig. 5A) (COG1901 subsystem in the SEED database). m1Ψ54 is typically an archaeal tRNA signature modification (Gupta and Woese 1980; Pang et al. 1982) and has never been identified in any bacterial tRNA sequenced so far (for review, see Grosjean et al. 2008b)). Therefore, the presence of TrmY was not expected in bacterial genomes. In addition, the gene coding for the enzyme TrmA responsible for the formation of the canonical m5U54 in the T-loop of bacterial tRNA (Ny and Björk 1980) is found in all sequenced Vibrio genomes (VV1_1171 in Vibrio vulnificus, see COG1901 subsystem in the SEED database). The presence of COG1901 homologs in just a few bacteria could suggest that the gene family arose from a recent horizontal gene transfer event from Archaea. However, the phylogenetic analysis of the COG1901 family (Fig. 5A) shows that bacterial and archaeal COG1901 proteins form two distinct monophyletic groups, which is not easily compatible with the above hypothesis. Although the overall fold of VV2_1434 (COG1901 homolog in V. vulnificus) shares close structural similarity to that of Mj1640 (Z-score 26.0, RMS 1.6 Å, 181 Cα), significant differences for local conserved motifs and overall charge distributions are observed between these two structures (Fig. 5B). In general, VV2_1434 has a more compact structure compared with Mj1640, suggesting that the bacterial and archaeal homologs may fulfill different functions. For example, Mj1640 displays short β-strands with flexible loops at the middle part of the β-sheet compared with those of VV2_1434, whereas VV2_1434 displays an extra α-helix at its “head” of the overall “butterfly” shape (Fig. 5B). Further experimental work is required to establish the function of the bacterial COG1901 members.
This work generally reinforces the difficulty of transferring functional annotations of RNA methylases. TrmY are homologs of Nep1 but carry the same reaction (methylation of a Ψ residue) in different substrates, one tRNA the other rRNA. Also, even if we have functionally characterized the function of COG1901 as TrmY in a few Archaea, some of the COG1901 homologs (for example, in Thermococcales or Bacteria) might have another function. Experimental validation of judiciously chosen members is the only solution to correctly annotating RNA methylase superfamilies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bioinformatics
Sequences and distribution of all genes/proteins analyzed in this work are available through the “COG1901 sub-system” on the public SEED server (http://pubseed.theseed.org/SubsysEditor.cgi?page=SubsystemOverview) (Overbeek et al. 2005). We also used the BLAST tools and resources at NCBI (Altschul et al. 1997). Multiple protein alignments were performed with the ClustalW tool (Chenna et al. 2003) in the SEED database or the MultiAlign software (http://omics.pnl.gov/). H. volcanii genome sequences were obtained from the UCSC browser (http://archaea.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway?db=haloVolc1). For the phylogenetic analysis, candidate protein sequences were identified using the BLAST tool at NCBI (Altschul et al. 1997), all were COG1901 members (see Supplemental File 1 for the list of sequences used). Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) through the EMBL-EBI website. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MrBayes 3.1 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) from the command line using the Dayhoff-6 amino acid categories and inferred a tree with the CAT+Γ model to account for evolutionary rate site variations. MrBayes was run for 1,100,000 MCMC iterations with a burnin of 100,000. Trees were sampled every 1000 iterations. A consensus tree was generated and visualized using FigTree 1.3.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
Strains, media, and transformation
All strains used in this study are detailed in Supplemental Table S1. H. volcanii H26 was used as the wild-type (WT) strain. E. coli was routinely grown in LB-Lennox (LB) (Fisher) or LB agar (Fisher) at 37°C, supplemented when required with ampicillin (Amp; 100 μg/mL), isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; 0.2 mM), and bromo-chloro-indolyl-galactopyranoside (X-gal; 40 μg/mL). When required, novobiocin was added to a final concentration of 0.3 μg/mL. H. volcanii cells were routinely grown at 44°C (unless specified) in rich medium (Hv-YPC) or minimal medium (Hv-min). H. volcanii media were made according to the recipes provided in the HaloHandbook (http://www.haloarchaea.com/resources/halohandbook/). Transformations of chemically competent E. coli were performed as described by the manufacturer's directions (Invitrogen). Transformation of H. volcanii was performed as described in the HaloHandbook using the “standard PEG-mediated transformation of Haloarchaea” protocol.
Plasmid and deletion strain construction
All plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Supplemental Tables S2 and S3, respectively. pIKB227, a pTA131 derivative used to disrupt trmY (HVO_1989) was produced as described previously (Blaby et al. 2010) using oligonucleotide pairs HVO1989_N_IfKO_Fwd, HVO1989_N_IfKO_Rev, HVO1989_C_IfKO_Fwd, and HVO1989_C_IfKO_Rev to amplify the regions upstream of and downstream from the target gene. Demethylated pIKB227 was prepared by passaging the plasmid through E. coli (INV110, Invitrogen) and was subsequently used in the pop-in/pop-out procedure (Allers et al. 2004) to delete trmY on the H. volcanii H26 chromosome. trmY of Halobacterium sp. NRC1 (VNG_1980C) was amplified by PCR from purified genomic DNA using Phusion Hot Start polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) and Hsal_cog1901_Fwd and Hsal_cog1901_Rev as primers. The amplicon was inserted, after digestion with the compatible enzymes, between the NdeI and BlpI sites of pJAM202 to generate pIKB421 (pHTrmY). This plasmid was verified by PCR, restriction digestion, and sequencing, and then passed through E. coli (INV110, Invitrogen) before transformation into the H. volcanii strain VDC2376 (ΔtrmY), creating complemented strain VDC2604. Transformants were selected for by plating onto Hv-YPC containing novobiocin (0.3 μg/mL).
Detection of m1Ψ residues in tRNAs
For analysis by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), H. volcanii bulk tRNA was prepared, hydrolyzed, and analyzed as described previously (de Crécy-Lagard et al. 2010). tRNA purifications and analyses were performed at least twice independently. For analysis by 2D-TLC, uniformly 32P-labeled total tRNA was prepared as described before (Gupta 1984; Joardar et al. 2008). Labeled tRNAs were digested with nuclease P1 and digests were resolved on cellulose plates (EM Science) using isobutyric acid/0.5 N NH4OH (5:3, v/v) in the first dimension and isopropanol/HCl/H2O (70:15:15, v/v/v) in the second dimension (Gupta 1984). Radioactivity in the plates was revealed by phosphorimaging. Presence of Ψ at a specific position in tRNA was analyzed by the 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (CMCT) modification technique (Ofengand et al. 2001; Motorin et al. 2007) using total small RNA. For this, initially total RNA was prepared from the cells using TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc). Small RNA fraction from the total RNA was extracted by suspending total RNA in 1 M NaCl by vigorous vortexing. The high-salt soluble fraction was separated from insoluble material by centrifugation. RNA was precipitated from the supernatant by ethanol. A total of 5 μg of this RNA was treated with CMCT for 2, 10, and 20 min each at 37°C, while an untreated sample was simply incubated at 37°C for 20 min as control. After precipitation of the RNA, alkali treatment was done for 3 h at 37°C for all samples except the ones treated with CMCT for 2 min. Again, after precipitation the RNA was used for primer extension with [5′-32P]-labeled primers that hybridized close to and on the 3′ side of the position to be mapped for Ψ. AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega) was used for primer extension according to the manufacturer's protocol, except that the reverse-transcription reaction was done at 50°C for 1 h with 0.75 mM dNTP each. The extension stops at one residue before the CMCT modified Ψ. A dark band in CMCT, followed by alkali treatment lanes, with an increased intensity in the 20-min treatment lane indicates the presence of Ψ at that position. The position of the band in the gel that corresponds to Ψ is determined by its distance from the end of the primer and sometimes the presence of darker bands for U and G in the 2-min CMCT, but no alkali treatment lane, and correlation with the known sequence of the RNA.
Expression and purification of TrmY of M. jannaschii
Recombinant TrmY protein of M. jannaschii (MJ1640) was purified as described before (Chen and Yuan 2010). These procedures are considered native conditions in this work. The protein was also prepared under renaturing conditions. For this, harvested cells were resuspended in a buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 500 mM NaCl) containing 8 M urea, and lysed by sonication. The supernatant from a 25-min spin at 13,000 rpm at 4°C was loaded onto a Ni2+ column at room temperature equilibrated with the same buffer. The protein was renatured on the column in a gradient of 8 M urea to no urea in the same buffer containing 2.5 mM imidazole. After a brief wash with 25 mM imidazole containing buffer, the protein was eluted using 250 mM imidazole in the same buffer. Pooled fractions were then dialyzed using 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), and 20% Glycerol.
In vitro tRNA methylation assays
Transcripts for H. volcanii tRNATrp and elongator tRNAMet (lacking their introns), T-arm-Trp, and T-arm-Met were generated as described previously (Gurha et al. 2007). Mutants of tRNATrp were prepared by independently changing U55 to A, C, and G, and of tRNAMet by changing U54 to A as described before (Gurha et al. 2007). Sequences of these transcripts are shown in Figure 4A. Appropriate labeled transcripts were prepared using relevant [α-32P]NTP. Recombinant M. jannaschii Pus10 was used first to convert U54 and U55 equivalents of these transcripts into Ψ as described previously (Gurha and Gupta 2008). M. jannaschii TrmY efficiently works under a range of salt concentrations (100–500 mM NaCl). Our standard 20-μL methylation reaction contained 100–150 nM pseudouridylated RNA and 1 μM renatured M. jannaschii TrmY in 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.75 mM DTT, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM AdoMet, and 5% Glycerol. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 68°C for 1 h, RNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and digested with RNase T2 or nuclease P1. The digests were resolved by TLC as described before for uniformly labeled tRNA. For methylation inhibition reactions, proteins isolated under native conditions were used and 0.1 mM of S-adenosylhomocysteine, instead of AdoMet, was used in the reactions.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental material is available for this article.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
H. volcanii H26 was received from Julie Maupin-Furlow (University of Florida) as well as from Thorsten Allers (University of Nottingham, UK). Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 genomic DNA was prepared by Gabriela Phillips (University of Florida). Plasmid pJAM202 was a gift from Julie Maupin-Furlow. We thank Archi Joardar for providing M. jannaschii Pus10 and Sophie Alvarez for performing the LC–MS analyses, and Elisha Fitzek for analysis of archaeal Pus10 using structural criteria for functional proteins. H.G. holds a position of Emeritus Scientist at the CNRS, Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, in Gif-sur-Yvette. This work was funded in part by NIGMS (Grant no. 1RC2GM092602–01 subcontract to V.d.C.-L.), NSF (Grant no. MCB-05169448 to V.d.C.-L.), and NIH (Grant no. GM055945 to R.G.).
Footnotes
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.030841.111.
REFERENCES
- Alian A, Lee TT, Griner SL, Stroud RM, Finer-Moore J 2008. Structure of a TrmA–RNA complex: A consensus RNA fold contributes to substrate selectivity and catalysis in m5U methyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 6876–6881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allers T, Ngo H, Mevarech M, Lloyd RG 2004. Development of additional selectable markers for the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii based on the leuB and trpA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 943–953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auxilien S, Rasmussen A, Rose S, Brochier-Armanet Cl, Husson C, Fourmy D, Grosjean H, Douthwaite S 2011. Specificity shifts in the rRNA and tRNA nucleotide targets of archaeal and bacterial m5U methyltransferases. RNA 17: 45–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakin AV, Ofengand J 1998. Mapping of pseudouridine residues in RNA to nucleotide resolution. Methods Mol Biol 77: 297–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becker HF, Motorin Y, Sissler M, Florentz C, Grosjean H 1997. Major identity determinants for enzymatic formation of ribothymidine and pseudouridine in the T ψ-loop of yeast tRNAs. J Mol Biol 274: 505–518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Best AN 1978. Composition and characterization of tRNA from Methanococcus vannielii. J Bacteriol 133: 240–250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaby IK, Phillips G, Blaby-Haas CE, Gulig KS, El Yacoubi B, de Crécy-Lagard V 2010. Towards a systems approach in the genetic analysis of archaea: accelerating mutant construction and phenotypic analysis in Haloferax volcanii. Archaea 2010: 426239 doi: 10.1155/2010/426239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brand RC, Klootwijk J, Planta RJ, Maden BE 1978. Biosynthesis of a hypermodified nucleotide in Saccharomyces carlsbergensis 17S and HeLa-cell 18S ribosomal ribonucleic acid. Biochem J 169: 71–77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchhaupt M, Meyer B, Kötter P, Entian K-D 2006. Genetic evidence for 18S rRNA binding and an Rps19p assembly function of yeast nucleolar protein Nep1p. Mol Genet Genomics 276: 273–284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cantara WA, Crain PF, Rozenski J, McCloskey JA, Harris KA, Zhang X, Vendeix FAP, Fabris D, Agris PF 2011. The RNA modification database, RNAMDB: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D195–D201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H-Y, Yuan YA 2010. Crystal structure of Mj1640/DUF358 protein reveals a putative SPOUT-class RNA methyltransferase. J Mol Cell Biol 2: 366–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD 2003. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3497–3500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Constantinesco F, Motorin Y, Grosjean H 1999. Transfer RNA modification enzymes from Pyrococcus furiosus: detection of the enzymatic activities in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 1308–1315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crain PF 1990. Preparation and enzymatic hydrolysis of DNA and RNA for mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol 193: 782–790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czerwoniec A, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Purta E, Kaminska KH, Kasprzak JM, Bujnicki JM, Grosjean H, Rother K 2009. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D118–D121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Crécy-Lagard V, Brochier-Armanet C, Urbonavicius J, Fernandez B, Phillips G, Lyons B, Noma A, Alvarez S, Droogmans L, Armengaud J, et al. 2010. Biosynthesis of wyosine derivatives in tRNA: an ancient and highly diverse pathway in Archaea. Mol Biol Evol 27: 2062–2077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar RC 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edmonds CG, Vestal ML, McCloskey JA 1985. Thermospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of nucleosides and of enzymatic hydrolysates of nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 13: 8197–8206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edmonds CG, Crain PF, Gupta R, Hashizume T, Hocart CH, Kowalak JA, Pomerantz SC, Stetter KO, McCloskey JA 1991. Posttranscriptional modification of tRNA in thermophilic archaea (Archaebacteria). J Bacteriol 173: 3138–3148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H. 2009. Nucleic Acids are not boring long polymers of only four types of nucleotides. In DNA and RNA modification enzymes: Structure, mechanism, function and evolution (ed. H Grosjean), pp. 1–18. Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX. [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H, Constantinesco F, Foiret D, Benachenhou N 1995. A novel enzymatic pathway leading to 1-methylinosine modification in Haloferax volcanii tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4312–4319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H, Edqvist J, Straby KB, Giegé R 1996. Enzymatic formation of modified nucleosides in tRNA: dependence on tRNA architecture. J Mol Biol 255: 67–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H, Droogmans L, Roovers M, Keith G 2007. Detection of enzymatic activity of transfer RNA modification enzymes using radiolabeled tRNA substrates. Methods Enzymol 425: 55–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H, Gaspin C, Marck C, Decatur WA, de Crécy-Lagard V 2008a. RNomics and Modomics in the halophilic archaea Haloferax volcanii: identification of RNA modification genes. BMC Genomics 9: 470 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosjean H, Gupta R, Maxwell ES 2008b. Modified nucleotides in Archaeal RNAs. In Archaea: New models for prokaryotic biology (ed. P Blum), pp. 171–196. Horizon Scientific Press, Caister Academic Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
- Gu X-R, Nicoghosian K, Cedergren RJ, Wong JT-F 1983. Sequences of halobacterial tRNAs and the paucity of U in the first position of their anticodons. Nucleic Acids Res 11: 5433–5442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu X-R, Nicoghosian K, Cedergren RJ 1984. Glycine and asparagme tRNA sequences from the archaebacteriuin, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. FEBS Lett 176: 462–466 [Google Scholar]
- Gu X, Ivanetich KM, Santi DV 1996. Recognition of the T-arm of tRNA by tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase is not sequence specific. Biochemistry 35: 11652–11659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R 1984. Halobacterium volcanii tRNAs: identification of 41 tRNAs covering all amino acids, and the sequences of 33 Class I tRNAs. J Biol Chem 259: 9461–9471 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R 1986. Transfer RNAs of Halobacterium volcanii: sequences of five leucine and three serine tRNAs. Syst Appl Microbiol 7: 102–105 [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R, Woese C 1980. Unusual modification patterns in the transfer ribonucleic acids of archaebacteria. Curr Microbiol 4: 245–249 [Google Scholar]
- Gurha P, Gupta R 2008. Archaeal Pus10 proteins can produce both pseudouridine 54 and 55 in tRNA. RNA 14: 2521–2527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gurha P, Joardar A, Chaurasia P, Gupta R 2007. Differential roles of archaeal box H/ACA proteins in guide RNA-dependent and independent pseudouridine formation. RNA Biol 4: 101–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gutgsell N, Englund N, Niu L, Kaya Y, Lane BG, Ofengand J 2000. Deletion of the Escherichia coli pseudouridine synthase gene truB blocks formation of pseudouridine 55 in tRNA in vivo, does not affect exponential growth, but confers a strong selective disadvantage in competition with wild-type cells. RNA 6: 1870–1881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joardar A, Gurha P, Skariah G, Gupta R 2008. Box C/D RNA-guided 2′-O methylations and the intron of tRNATrp are not essential for the viability of Haloferax volcanii. J Bacteriol 190: 7308–7313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilpatrick MW, Walker RT 1981. The nucleotide sequence of the tRNAMMet from the archaebacterium Thermoplasma acidophilum. Nucleic Acids Res 9: 4387–4390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinghorn SM, O'Byrne CP, Booth IR, Stansfield I 2002. Physiological analysis of the role of truB in Escherichia coli: a role for tRNA modification in extreme temperature resistance. Microbiology 148: 3511–3520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotlova N, Ishii TM, Zagryadskaya EI, Steinberg SV 2007. Active suppressor tRNAs with a double helix between the D- and T-loops. J Mol Biol 373: 462–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kowalak JA, Dalluge JJ, McCloskey JA, Stetter KO 1994. The role of posttranscriptional modification in stabilization of transfer RNA from hyperthermophiles. Biochemistry 33: 7869–7876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kowalak JA, Bruenger E, Crain PF, McCloskey JA 2000. Identities and phylogenetic comparisons of posttranscriptional modifications in 16S ribosomal RNA from Haloferax volcanii. J Biol Chem 275: 24484–24489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuchino Y, Ihara M, Yabusaki Y, Nishimura S 1982. Initiator tRNAs from archaebacteria show common unique sequence characteristics. Nature 298: 684–685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee TT, Agarwalla S, Stroud RM 2005. A unique RNA fold in the RumA-RNA-cofactor ternary complex contributes to substrate selectivity and enzymatic function. Cell 120: 599–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leulliot N, Bohnsack MT, Graille M, Tollervey D, Van Tilbeurgh H 2008. The yeast ribosome synthesis factor Emg1 is a novel member of the superfamily of α/β knot fold methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 629–639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marck C, Grosjean H 2002. tRNomics: analysis of tRNA genes from 50 genomes of Eukarya, Archaea, and Bacteria reveals anticodon-sparing strategies and domain-specific features. RNA 8: 1189–1232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer B, Wurm JP, Kötter P, Leisegang MS, Schilling V, Buchhaupt M, Held M, Bahr U, Karas M, Heckel A, et al. 2011. The Bowen–Conradi syndrome protein Nep1 (Emg1) has a dual role in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis, as an essential assembly factor and in the methylation of Ψ1191 in yeast 18S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 1526–1537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motorin Y, Helm M 2011. RNA nucleotide methylation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2: 611–631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motorin Y, Muller S, Behm-Ansmant I, Branlant C 2007. Identification of modified residues in RNAs by reverse transcription-based methods. Methods Enzymol 425: 21–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoghosian K, Gu X-R, Cedergren R 1985. Halobacterium cutirubrum tRNA sequences. FEBS Lett 193: 255–260 [Google Scholar]
- Nishikura K, De Robertis EM 1981. RNA processing in microinjected Xenopus oocytes. Sequential addition of base modifications in the spliced transfer RNA. J Mol Biol 145: 405–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noon KR, Guymon R, Crain PF, McCloskey JA, Thomm M, Lim J, Cavicchioli R 2003. Influence of temperature on tRNA modification in Archaea: Methanococcoides burtonii (Optimum Growth Temperature [Topt], 23°C) and Stetteria hydrogenophila (Topt, 95°C). J Bacteriol 185: 5483–5490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ny T, Björk GR 1980. Cloning and restriction mapping of the trmA gene coding for transfer ribonucleic acid (5-methyluridine)-methyltransferase in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 142: 371–379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ofengand J, Del Campo M, Kaya Y 2001. Mapping pseudouridines in RNA molecules. Methods 25: 365–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overbeek R, Begley T, Butler RM, Choudhuri JV, Chuang HY, Cohoon M, de Crécy-Lagard V, Diaz N, Disz T, Edwards R, et al. 2005. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res Symp Series 33: 5691–5702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pang H, Ihara M, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Gupta R, Woese CR, McCloskey JA 1982. Structure of a modified nucleoside in archaebacterial tRNA which replaces ribosylthymine. 1-Methylpseudouridine. J Biol Chem 257: 3589–3592 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romby P, Carbon P, Westhof E, Ehresmann C, Ebel JP, Ehresmann B, Giegé R 1987. Importance of conserved residues for the conformation of the T-loop in tRNAs. J Biomol Struct Dyn 5: 669–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tatusov R, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Kiryutin B, Koonin E, Krylov D, Mazumder R, Mekhedov S, Nikolskaya A, et al. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 41 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor AB, Meyer B, Leal BZ, Kötter P, Schirf V, Demeler B, Hart PJ, Entian K-D, Wöhnert J 2008. The crystal structure of Nep1 reveals an extended SPOUT-class methyltransferase fold and a pre-organized SAM-binding site. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 1542–1554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas SR, Keller CA, Szyk A, Cannon JR, LaRonde-LeBlanc NA 2011. Structural insight into the functional mechanism of Nep1/Emg1 N1-specific pseudouridine methyltransferase in ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 2445–2457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tkaczuk K, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Purta E, Bujnicki J 2007. Structural and evolutionary bioinformatics of the SPOUT superfamily of methyltransferases. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 73 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urbonavicius J, Auxilien S, Walbott H, Trachana K, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B, Brochier-Armanet C, Grosjean H 2008. Acquisition of a bacterial RumA-type tRNA(uracil-54, C5)-methyltransferase by Archaea through an ancient horizontal gene transfer. Mol Microbiol 67: 323–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walbott H, Leulliot N, Grosjean H, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B 2008. The crystal structure of Pyrococcus abyssi tRNA (uracil-54, C5)-methyltransferase provides insights into its tRNA specificity. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 4929–4940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wurm JP, Meyer B, Bahr U, Held M, Frolow O, Kotter P, Engels JW, Heckel A, Karas M, Entian KD, et al. 2010. The ribosome assembly factor Nep1 responsible for Bowen-Conradi syndrome is a pseudouridine-N1-specific methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 2387–2398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Youvan DC, Hearst JE 1981. A sequence from Drosophila melanogaster 18S rRNA bearing the conserved hypermodified nucleoside amψ: analysis by reverse transcription and high-performance liquid chromatography. Nucleic Acids Res 9: 1723–1742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]