Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2012 Mar 14;53(11):1345–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.12.126

Cascade assembly of the benzo[a]anthraquinone ring system common to the angucycline antibiotics

Aleksandra Baranczak 1, Gary A Sulikowski 1,
PMCID: PMC3287049  NIHMSID: NIHMS350217  PMID: 22383859

Abstract

A benzo[a]anthraquinone ring system, common to a group of angucycline antibiotics, has been prepared by a unique cascade of reactions. The reaction sequence was initiated by a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling between a bromoquinone and vinyl boronic anhdyride. The reaction product is proposed to undergo a 6π-electron cyclization triggered by reductive activation of the quinone. The reaction process is proposed to be autocatalytic.

Keywords: Cascade reaction, Quinone, Electrocyclization, Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, Reductive activation


The structural feature common to the angucycline antibiotics is a benz[a]anthraquinone aglycone that varies in oxidation state within the AB ring sub-structure (Figure 1).1 Since the identification tetrangangomycin in 1965 a large number of angucycline metabolites have been identified with associated biological activity ranging from antitumor to antifungal. These discoveries have stimulated interest in the total synthesis of this sub-class of aromatic polyketide natural products.2 The Diels-Alder and Hauser type annulations have figured prominently among synthetic strategies leading to the chemical synthesis of a variety of angucyclinones. Moore3a–c and others3d–f have employed a cascade of pericyclic reactions starting from benzocyclobutenes to construct the central quinone (C ring) in order to complete benzoanthraquinone ring assembly (1, 2, Scheme 1). In the course of studies on aromatic polyketides unrelated to the angucyclines we have uncovered a new route to access the angucyline ring system by apparent rearrangement of vinyl quinone 4 to construct the corner B ring. The synthesis of quinone 4 required access to uniquely functionalized protected hydroquinone 3. Herein, we detail the results of this serendipitous discovery and a brief discussion of mechanistic implications of the key rearrangement.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Select angucycline antibiotics.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Pericyclic reactions leading to benz[a]anthraquinone core.

Our synthetic studies started from dibromonaphthazarin 6 prepared by the Brazzard annulation reaction.4 Reduction of quinone 6 to the corresponding dihydroquinone was followed by immediate phenol protection with MOMCl using Adogen 464 as a phase-transfer reagent.5 At this point we required a bromotin exchange resulting in desymmetrization of dibromide 7. The required metalation relied upon an initial lithium-halogen exchange that under standard conditions provided a mixture of distannane 9 and proton quenched products 10 and 11. A solution to this undesired reaction outcome was found in a publication by Yoshida and co-workers6a who studied the mono lithium-halogen using 1,2-dibromobenzene.6 Yoshida’s studies indicated a rapid quench with stannyl chloride was critical to the success of the reaction. Indeed, when addition of n-butyllithium to dibromide 7 was followed by the addition of trimethylstannyl chloride after 50 seconds we were gratified to isolate bromostannane 8 in a reproducible 80–85% yield.

Stille cross-coupling of bromostannane 8 with 2-iodocyclohexenone proceeded smoothly using reaction conditions reported by Porco in his synthesis of (−)-kinamycin C.7 Oxidation of MOM protected dihydroquinone 13 with CAN in acetonitrile led to bromoquinone 14 now activated to engage in a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling. In the event reaction of 14 with vinyl boronic anhydride did not lead to the expected vinyl quinone but unexpectedly angular quinone 16 (29%). When the coupling was carried out with vinyl boronate 15 quinone 17 was produced in 48% yield.

The cross-coupling of 14 with vinyl boronic anhydride likely delivers vinyl quinone 18a, less clear is the pathway by which 18a proceeds to the observed product quinone 16. The most direct pathway proceeds by way of a 6π-electrocyclic ring closure to 19 followed by isomerization to hydroquinone 20 followed by oxidation to 16. However, the pericyclic rearrangement of 18a to 19 would likely be a high-energy transformation requiring a reaction temperature significantly higher than observed.8 An alternate explanation would be anion-accelerated process by way of either semiquinone 18b or two-electron reduction product 18c.9 Interestingly, many quinone containing natural products including mitomycin, dynemycin and anthracyclines utilize quinone reductive activation to trigger chemical transformations leading to reactive intermediates poised to modify biomolecules such as DNA.10 When accompanied by subsequent oxidation rearrangement of 18b/18c leads to dihydroquinone 20 by way of quinone 19. Finally, oxidation of 20 would account for the observed production of angular quinone 16. The final oxidation of 20 could be achieved by conversion of quinone 18a to dihydroquinone 18c. Overall, the proposed reaction pathway shown in Scheme 4 is reductive rendering the process autocatalytic.11

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Proposed reaction pathway from 18 to 16.

In conclusion, we have discovered a new synthetic route to access the core tetracyclic structure common to members of the angucycline group of antibiotics. Interestingly, this transformation may take advantage of quinone reduction as a means of reaction acceleration, and when combined with a final oxidation step constitutes an autocatalytic process.

Supplementary Material

01

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Desymmetrization of dibromonaphthazarin.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Preparation of benz[a]anthraquinone.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (CA 059515) and the Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology. We also acknowledge Dr. Weidong Zhang for early studies on the conversion of dibromide 7 to arylstannane 8.

Footnotes

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at do:XXXXX.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Rohr J, Thiericke R. Nat Prod Rep. 1992;9:103–137. doi: 10.1039/np9920900103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carreno M, Urbano A. Synlett. 2005:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Heileman M, Tiedemann R, Moore H. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:3801–3802. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tiedemann R, Heileman M, Moore H, Schaumann E. J Org Chem. 1999;64:2170–2171. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hergueta A, Moore H. J Org Chem. 2002;67:1388–1391. doi: 10.1021/jo010919g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Koo S, Liebeskind L. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:3389–3404. [Google Scholar]; (e) Suzuki T, Hamura T, Suzuki K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:2248–2252. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Mori K, Tanaka Y, Ohmori K, Suzuki K. Chem Lett. 2008;37:470–471. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huot R, Brassard P. Can J Chem. 1974;52:838–842. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Seitz U, Daub J. Synthesis. 1986:686–689. [Google Scholar]; (b) Roush W, Madar D, Coffey D. Can J Chem. 2001;79:1711–1726. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Usutani H, Tomida Y, Nagaki A, Okamoto H, Nokami T, Yoshida JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3046–3048. doi: 10.1021/ja068330s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Saito M, Nitta M, Yoshioka M. Organometallics. 2001;20:749–753. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lei X, Porco JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:14790–14791. doi: 10.1021/ja066621v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Faragher R, Gilchrist T, Southon I. Tetrahedron Letters. 1979:4113–4116. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bradbury R, Gilchrist T, Rees C. J Chem Soc Perk Trans. 1981;1:3234–3238. [Google Scholar]; (c) Munslow W, Rersch W. J Org Chem. 1982;47:5096–5099. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bronson JJ, Danheier RL. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, Fleming I, Paquette LA, editors. Vol. 5. Pergamon Press; New York: 1991. pp. 699–750. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wolkenberg S, Boger D. Chem Rev. 2002;102:2477–2495. doi: 10.1021/cr010046q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pererson D, Fisher J. Biochemistry. 1986;25:4077–4084. doi: 10.1021/bi00362a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES