Abstract
Primary rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) are difficult to maintain in a differentiated state in culture for scientific studies or technological applications. Relatively little is known about molecular regulatory processes that affect LSEC differentiation because of this inability to maintain cellular viability and proper phenotypic characteristics for extended times in vitro, given that LSEC typically undergo death and detachment around 48–72 h even when treated with VEGF. We demonstrate that particular lipid supplements added to serum-free, VEGF-containing medium increase primary rat liver LSEC viability and maintain differentiation. Addition of a defined lipid combination, or even oleic acid (OA) alone, promotes LSEC survival beyond 72 h and proliferation to confluency. Moreover, assessment of LSEC cultures for endocytic function, CD32b surface expression, and exhibition of fenestrae showed that these differentiation characteristics were maintained when lipids were included in the medium. With respect to the underlying regulatory pathways, we found lipid supplement-enhanced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and MAPK signaling to be critical for ensuring LSEC function in a temporally dependent manner. Inhibition of Akt activity before 72 h prevents growth of SEC, whereas MEK inhibition past 72 h prevents survival and proliferation. Our findings indicate that OA and lipids modulate Akt/PKB signaling early in culture to mediate survival, followed by a switch to a dependence on ERK signaling pathways to maintain viability and induce proliferation after 72 h. We conclude that free fatty acids can support maintenance of liver LSEC cultures in vitro; key regulatory pathways involved include early Akt signaling followed by ERK signaling.
Keywords: unsaturated fatty acids, fenestrae, vascular endothelial growth factor, CD32b, monoculture
liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) play important roles in regulating liver function. LSEC line capillaries of the microvasculature and possess fenestrae to facilitate filtration between the liver parenchyma and sinusoid by serving as a selectively permeable barrier (7, 23). This role is augmented by high endocytic uptake rates, making LSEC effective scavengers for molecules such albumin, acetylated low-density lipoproteins, hyaluronan, and antigens in the bloodstream (22, 23, 26, 34, 40, 43). Furthermore, LSEC have a phenotype unique from traditional vascular endothelial cells, such as pan-endothelial marker CD31 localized only to endosomes in differentiated, unstimulated LSEC (18). Differentiated LSEC are capable of affecting resident liver cell proliferation, survival, or maintaining their quiescence. As such, loss of function may underlie various hepatic pathologies (7, 16, 24, 33, 50, 57).
LSEC are also targets or facilitators of infection and toxicological damage to liver (5). In addition to intrinsically vital contributions they make to proper liver tissue function in vivo, cultured LSEC are important to consider as essential nonparenchymal components of ex vivo tissue-engineered models of liver physiology, which are of emerging importance in drug discovery and development (19, 29, 47, 51).
Despite this importance, much of LSEC biology remains unknown because they are difficult to maintain in a differentiated state for prolonged periods in vitro. Conventional endothelial culturing techniques are not as successful with LSEC; low serum concentrations (5%) can be toxic, and cells die within 48–72 h in serum-free monocultures even in the presence of VEGF (21, 31). Previously, attempts at serum-free LSEC culture resulted in cell viability maintenance from 6 up to 30 days with surviving cells maintaining endocytic uptake (20, 21, 31). Receptor-mediated endocytic uptake is a characteristic feature of endothelial phenotype but is insufficient for specific characterization of LSEC differentiation, since large venule endothelial cells in the liver, as well as several vascular endothelial cells, also exhibit this function (21, 28, 40, 41, 54). Another rat study was also able to prolong cell survival in vitro with the use of multiple growth factors such as FGF, hepatocyte growth factor, and PMA within the context of hepatocyte-conditioned medium (31). Human LSEC cultures have been reported to be sustained for long periods; however, these LSEC were positively selected for or had a higher expression of CD31, a marker of LSEC dedifferentiation (14, 32). There are also controversies regarding phenotyping human LSEC, because there are reports of heterogeneous expression of surface markers used to characterize LSEC, such as von Willebrand factor and immunological markers (21).
This study tested the hypothesis that an alternative approach emphasizing nonprotein components could be beneficial in maintaining LSEC function in culture. Because of the location of the liver downstream of the intestinal tract and a center for lipid metabolism (10), we hypothesized that LSEC require lipids to maintain cell viability. We found that even in serum-free minimal growth factor (i.e., solely VEGF) media, free fatty acids (FFAs) were able to sustain LSEC culture. The addition of lipid supplements to serum-free media with 50 ng/ml VEGF allowed us to bypass the critical time point between 48 and 72 h when most differentiated LSEC die in vitro. We identified oleic acid (OA) as a major contributing agent responsible for enhancing this survival. OA and lipids in culture could also eventually induce proliferation of cells with LSEC phenotype to confluency, although OA alone was insufficient for maintaining long-term confluent cultures. Furthermore, our results indicate that OA and lipids can maintain multiple LSEC phenotype markers simultaneously for at least 5 days in culture. Our findings indicate that OA and lipids influence early Akt/PKB signaling to mediate cell survival, whereas late ERK signaling is necessary in culture for viability and proliferation to persist.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemically defined culture media.
Serum/growth factor-free base medium was made as described with modifications (27, 31). Low-glucose DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was supplemented with 0.03 g/l l-proline, 0.10 g/l l-ornithine, 0.305 g/l niacinamide, 1 g/l glucose, 2 g/l galactose, 2 g/l BSA, 50 μg/ml gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 1 mM l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 5 μg/ml insulin-5 μg/ml transferrin-5 ng/ml sodium selenite (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Modified hepatocyte growth medium (HGM) included 200 μM ethanolamine and phosphoethanolamine, 100 nM ascorbic acid, 110 nM hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 20 μg/ml heparin (Celsus Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH), and 50 ng/ml VEGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Additional treatments included 1% chemically defined lipid concentrate (∼8 μM final concentration; Invitrogen no. 11905031) or 50 μM OA, FFA-free BSA, phosphatidylcholine (PC;, 50 μM), and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC; 50 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich). For signaling studies, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor LY-294002 and the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901 (EMD Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ) were added to LSEC cultures 4 h after seeding and maintained throughout the experiment. Inhibitors were reconstituted in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) to 20 mM. LY-294002 was dosed at concentrations of 10 and 3 μM, whereas PD-0325901 was used at 1 and 0.3 μM. Inhibitors were replenished once a day with fresh medium changes.
LSEC isolation and culture.
Livers from ∼180- to 250-g male Fisher rats (Taconic, Hudson, NY) were used under the guidelines set forth by Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Committee on Animal Care. Cells were isolated with a two-step collagenase perfusion (27, 47) using Liberase Blendzyme (Roche Applied Science) in place of collagenase. The liver was perfused initially at 25 ml/min and reduced down to 15 ml/min flow rates in calcium-free 10 mM HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by 10 mM HEPES buffer with Blendzyme for cell isolation. The supernatant cell suspension from the perfusion was used to isolate LSEC at room temperature (6, 27). Very briefly, supernatant suspensions were spun down at 50 g for 3 min. Supernatants were spun at 100 g for 4 min. Supernatants following the spin were pelleted at 350 g for 10 min and resuspended in 20 ml of modified HGM without VEGF. The suspension was loaded over 25%/50% Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich)/PBS layers and centrifuged at 900 g for 20 min. The interfaces between the Percoll layers were taken and resuspended with 1:1 modified HGM without VEGF before being spun down at 950 g for 12 min. This LSEC-enriched pellet was then resuspended into modified HGM with 25 ng/ml VEGF and 2% FBS (Hyclone/Thermo Fisher Scientific, South Logan, UT). Cells were counted using Sytox orange exclusion and Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) staining on disposable hemocytometer (inCyto, Seoul, Korea). LSEC were then seeded onto 10 μg/ml fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich)-coated tissue culture plates at 400,000 cells/cm2. Four to six hours after seeding, culture media were changed with serum-free modified HGM supplemented with VEGF. Additional conditions included supplementing 50 μM OA, 50 μM LPC, 50 μM PC, and 1% lipid concentrate to the culture over the course of 5 days at 37°C and 5% CO2. Media for all cultures were changed on a daily basis for all experiments.
Live/dead assay.
LSEC viability was assessed using the Live/Dead assay kit (Invitrogen L3224). LSEC were incubated for 1 h with 2 μM calcein AM and 4 μM ethidium bromide homodimer in modified HGM. Cultures were washed with warm media before imaging.
Alamar blue metabolic assay.
Metabolic activity of LSEC was assessed over the time period of 5 days using Alamar blue (Invitrogen) reduction assays. Positive reference standards were first made by heating base modified HGM at 125°C with 10% Alamar blue until the entire reagent was oxidized and converted to a bright shade of red. On the days of analysis, 10% Alamar blue reagent was introduced to each well and allowed to incubate at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 6 h before being screened in a SpectraMax E2 (MDS Analytical Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA) fluorescent plate reader. Reference standards were included on each plate as positive controls and served as a point of reference in interpreting results. Fluorescence measurements were read by exciting the samples at 530 nm and reading the emission wavelengths at 590 nm. Samples were pooled across 3 biological replicates (5 technical replicates) for a total of 15 data points. All data points were normalized to blank readings before relative comparison to control samples.
Acetylated LDL uptake assay.
LSEC were grown on Thermanox coverslips (Nalgene Nunc, Rochester, NY) coated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin. On day 5, SEC were incubated for 4 h with 10 μg/ml 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate-labeled acetylated LDL (Di-I-Ac-LDL; Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA). Cells were washed several times with probe-free modified HGM and then rinsed with PBS. LSEC were fixed for 30 min in 3% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA), rinsed with PBS, mounted on glass slides with Fluormount (Sigma-Aldrich), and sealed with nail polish. Samples were compared with positive controls using human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMVEC; Lonza, Allendale, NJ).
Immunofluorescence microscopy.
LSEC were cultured for up to 5 days on Thermanox coverslips coated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin. Samples were rinsed with PBS and fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min. After fixation, samples were rinsed three times with PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h, excluding samples immunostained for CD31, which were not permeabilized so as to evaluate only surface expression. After permeabilization, samples were rinsed three times with 2% BSA in 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (PBS-T). Samples were blocked with 5% goat or donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) in 2% BSA PBS-T for 1 h before overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies for anti-rat CD32b/SE-1 (IBL America, Minneapolis, MN) at 1:100, CD31/PECAM-1 (Chemicon/Millipore, Temecula, CA) at 1:100, and PCNA (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at 1:600. The following day, samples were rinsed three times in 2% BSA PBS-T before a 1-h incubation step with secondary AlexaFluor 488/555 (Invitrogen) antibodies at 1:250. Coverslips were then rinsed in 2% BSA PBS-T and stained with 1:500 Hoechst. After incubation with secondary antibodies, samples were rinsed once in 2% BSA PBS-T before being treated briefly with nuclear Hoechst staining for 1 min. After Hoechst staining, samples were rinsed twice in normal PBS before being mounted onto glass slides with Fluormount and sealed with nail polish.
Scanning electron microscopy.
LSEC were grown on fibronectin-coated Thermanox coverslips. On days 3–5, LSEC were rinsed with PBS and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in PBS for 30 min. Samples were prepared following previously established protocols (27).
Flow cytometry.
Twenty-four hours before harvest, 10 μM 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU; Invitrogen) was added to all conditions. Samples were detached with 0.025% trypsin (Invitrogen) the following day, quenched with media containing 10% FBS, and immediately spun down at 1,600 rpm for 5 min. Cells were washed in PBS before being fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15–30 min at room temperature. LSEC were centrifuged, resuspended in 1% BSA in PBS, and incubated with primary CD32b antibody (1:100) before use of the Click-iT EdU kit, following manufacturer's instructions. Samples were analyzed on an Accuri-C6 (Accuri Cytometers, Ann Arbor, MI) flow cytometer and processed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR). HDMVEC were used as a negative control population. Total and cellular events were captured with gates created using forward and side scatter data from HDMVEC populations. After this, CD32b and EdU gates were designated using the double negative HDMVEC population.
Western blotting.
LSEC were harvested on day 5 of culture by incubation with cell lysis buffer (46) for 30 min. Cell lysis buffer consisted of 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 30 mM sodium fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 mM Tris (Roche Applied Science), 150 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail, and 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were spun down at 12,000 rpm for 12 min at 4°C and supernatants were reserved. Total protein content of sample lysates was determined using micro bicinchoninic acid kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) before samples were loaded onto the NuPage Novex system (Invitrogen). Lysates were loaded with 6× reducing buffer (Boston BioProducts, Worcester, MA) in 4%-12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS-T and incubated with antibodies for β-actin (1:5,000), phospho-ERK1/2 (1:5,000), ERK1/2 (1:5,000), phospho-Akt (1:1,000), and Akt (1:5,000) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed and then incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies (Amersham/GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA) at 1:10,000 dilution in PBS-T with 5% blotting grade nonfat dry milk (Bio-Rad). Membranes were subsequently visualized using chemiluminescent ECL kits (Amersham/GE Healthcare Biosciences) on a Kodak Image Station (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA).
Image and statistical analysis.
All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times with duplicate or triplicate samples. Fluorescent images were analyzed using Cell Profiler (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA) and ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Intact cell body counts from phase contrast were assessed at ×100 magnification. Cells from a camera area of 1,360 × 900 μm were counted from three biological replicates across 7 days. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA and Student's t-test (Microsoft Excel).
RESULTS
FFA lipids support cell survival past the first 48 h in serum-free media.
Isolated LSEC were plated and cultured using different lipid supplements of 50 μM OA or 1% lipid (a cocktail of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids) (Fig. 1). Immunofluorescence staining of LSEC 24 h after isolation indicated high purity of LSEC (see Fig. 5C). Distinct morphological changes were observed starting on day 3 in cultures with 50 μM OA or 1% lipid supplement, compared with control cultures (Fig. 1, A and C). Notably, LSEC cultured with 1% lipid underwent proliferation, and by day 5, the culture was at or near confluency. Both regular and FFA-free BSA were evaluated to account for potential variability of BSA-bound lipids. Medium supplemented with 50 μM OA yielded results similar to 1% lipid at day 5 in regular BSA. When FFA-free BSA was used, cells treated with 50 μM OA died after day 4 of culture (Fig. 1, B and D), although this was not observed with regular BSA. Untreated cells took on a granular appearance, indicating that lipid moiety is a critical component for LSEC viability (Fig. 1, C and D). Granular morphology was also observed in LSEC cultured with PC and LPC (data not shown).
Fig. 1.
Lipids in free fatty acid (FFA) form sustain long-term culture. Phase-contrast images of rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) were taken at day 5 of culture in serum-free medium [modified hepatocyte growth medium (HGM)] with regular BSA (A and C) or FFA-free BSA (B and D). LSEC were cultured with 50 ng/ml VEGF (control), plus 50 μM oleic acid (OA) or 1% chemically defined lipid concentrate. Only conditions with OA or lipid appeared favorable for persistence of cell culture. Higher magnification images indicate a pronounced change in morphology in lipid-treated conditions compared with untreated control cells, which appeared more granular (C and D). Scale bars: 50 μm, A and B; 20 μm, C and D.
Fig. 5.

LSEC differentiation marker CD32b, proliferation marker PCNA, and nuclear Hoechst colocalize to the same cells in FFA cultures. Five-day-old LSEC cultures were imaged for CD32b (green), nuclear PCNA antigen (red), and nuclear Hoechst dye (blue) (A). Punctate CD32b staining was observed in the control and did not colocalize with Hoechst. Broad, diffuse CD32b staining was observed in OA and lipid cultures on cells positive for PCNA and Hoechst, demonstrating that differentiated LSEC undergo proliferation at day 5 in vitro. Immunostaining controls for the absence of CD31 (B) and CD32b signal degradation (C) were performed. LSEC were cultured for 24 h before being stained with CD31 and Hoechst (B). Samples that were permeabilized were positive for CD31, whereas nonpermeabilized LSEC did not stain positive for CD31. LSEC culture were highly pure in LSEC population after 24 h using CD32b staining (C). After several days in culture, LSEC increased in surface area, whereas CD32b staining appears to have decreased in overall intensity compared with that of freshly isolated cells. This may indicate that LSEC are no longer actively synthesizing new CD32b antigen. Contrast and brightness were adjusted for the entire image due to background fluorescence arising from the Thermanox plastic coverslips. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Live/dead images of LSEC across conditions in both regular and FFA-free BSA were taken during 5 days of culture (Fig. 2, A and B). Massive cell death observed in the control concurs with previously reported observations of LSEC demise beyond 48 h in culture. Although all conditions experienced cell number decline between days 2 and 3, lipid- and OA-treated cultures recovered and proliferated in both types of BSA, with statistically significant differences in population after day 3 compared with control (P < 5E-4). (Fig. 2, C and D). Phase and live/dead staining indicated pronounced and distinct morphological changes for surviving LSEC. Lipid supplementation maintained LSEC to day 5. Cells grown with OA in normal BSA were viable 4 days after isolation; however, FFA-free BSA did not synergize with OA to maintain cell viability. Lipid and OA conditions had persistently higher total live cell percentages compared with control, PC, and LPC conditions; PC and LPC did not offer any growth advantage for LSEC relative to control (P > 0.24) (Fig. 2). Live/dead assay confirmed that LSEC with unhealthy granular appearance were dead and positive for ethidium bromide. PC and LPC cell cultures did not survive past day 2 in regular BSA (data not shown).
Fig. 2.

LSEC death at 48 h is abrogated following treatment with FFA. Live/dead assays were performed on LSEC culture across several conditions (A and B), with cell number quantification by Cell Profiler (C and D). Samples were treated with calcein AM (green) for live cells and ethidium bromide homodimer (red) for dead cells. Whereas all conditions experienced steep drops in total population by day 3, only OA or lipid treatments had significant live cell numbers (P < 5E-4 compared with control), indicating lipid type importance. PC, phosphatidylcholine; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine. Scale bar, 100 μm.
FFAs support metabolic and endocytic functionality in LSEC past day 3.
OA and lipid supplement supported significantly higher Alamar blue reduction relative to control, in agreement with live/dead stain results (Fig. 3A). These trends were also observed in FFA-free BSA cultures (Fig. 3B). Endocytic capacity was measured using Di-I-Ac-LDL uptake as a functional assay for endothelial phenotype (Fig. 3C). OA and lipid treatments sustained high endocytic uptake at day 5; cells positive for nuclear Hoechst were also strongly positive for Di-I-Ac-LDL. Many cells in the control did not remain after fixation; those that did remain stained positive for Hoechst but were negative for Di-I-Ac-LDL.
Fig. 3.

OA and lipid supplement support phenotype and function in LSEC cultures. Alamar blue measurements were statistically higher at days 3 (P < 0.05) and 5 (P < 0.005) in 50 μM OA and 1% lipid supplement treatments over control for LSEC in regular BSA (A). Similar trends were also observed in FFA-free BSA cultures (B). Alamar blue reduction was statistically higher at day 3 for 50 μM OA and 1% lipid supplement treatments over control, PC, and LPC. At day 5, only 1% lipid supplement treatment was statistically significant over control, PC, and LPC, indicating that the 50 μM OA condition was insufficient to sustain long-term cultures without the presence of other fatty acids. Most cells in the control condition did not survive past day 3; remaining cells did not costain for Hoechst (blue) and Di-I-Ac-LDL (red), whereas OA and lipid conditions consistently costained for both on day 5 (C). Contrast and brightness were adjusted for the entire image for Hoechst staining due to background fluorescence arising from the Thermanox coverslips. Scale bars: 100 μm, C; 2.5 μm, D.
LSEC phenotype and proliferation are partially maintained with lipids in growth factor-reduced, serum-free media.
After cell number reduction at day 3, LSEC phenotype was assessed. An important LSEC hallmark is the presence of fenestrae on cell surfaces. Using scanning electron microscopy, we found both 50 μM OA- and 1% lipid-treated LSEC expressed numerous fenestrae at days 3–5 of culture (Fig. 4), whereas control cells did not maintain fenestrae. Only about 5% of all FFA-treated cells expressed fenestrations in sieve plates. A larger percentage (10–15%) expressed large holes (Fig. 4, H and I) that are suspected to be sieve plate remnants. When the population was taken as a whole, porosity was well below the 10% observed for healthy LSEC in vivo (7), indicating that FFA alone does not maintain fenestrations at normal levels.
Fig. 4.
Maintenance of fenestrations in FFA cultures. LSEC cultures were evaluated for fenestrations at 3, 4, and 5 days after isolation in the presence or absence of lipid supplementation. At day 3, most cells in the control condition were dead (arrows) or had no visible fenestrations (A, D, G, J), whereas OA (B, E, H, K)- and lipid (C, F, I, L)-treated cultures displayed some cells with fenestrations arranged in sieve plates (arrowheads). Some cells displayed very large transcytotic pores (arrows). These fenestrations (arrowhead) and large pores (arrows) were maintained in a fraction of the treated cells until day 5. Mag, magnification. Scale bar in L represents 1 μm for panels B–F and J–L; scale bar in I represents 10 μm for panels A and G–I.
Another characteristic LSEC marker, CD32b, was used to corroborate phenotype. Immunostained coverslips revealed that cells treated with FFAs maintained CD32b expression at day 5 (Fig. 5A). Control cells remaining in culture did not have colocalization of CD32b surface expression with nuclei; CD32b appeared as punctate staining that were most likely dead cell remnants. Nonviable adherent cells appeared less frequently in protocols with multiple rinse steps (e.g., Di-I-Ac-LDL uptake, Fig. 3C; coimmunostaining, Fig. 5; flow cytometry, Fig. 6B). Although we stained for CD31, we did not observe CD31 expression on the cell surfaces of LSEC in FFA-treated conditions or remaining adherent cells in the control unless samples were permeabilized before staining (Fig. 5B). CD32b+ cells comprised a greater proportion of total cell populations in lipid-treated LSEC in flow cytometry compared with controls (Fig. 6C). The enhanced presence of CD32b+ cells in OA and lipid is consistent with immunostaining results. CD32b staining was still present on day 5 cultures treated with lipid (Fig. 5C) and OA (not shown), but signal intensity was diminished compared with LSEC evaluated on day 1 following isolation.
Fig. 6.
OA and lipid supplement help promote proliferation and maintain differentiation in long-term LSEC culture. Day 5 total events were captured by flow cytometry and gated for CD32b and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) using double-negative human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMVEC; A). Total event (cellular + debris) and cellular event counts were tallied and presented as the increase in number over control, showing a consistently 5- to 20-fold greater number of cellular events in OA and lipid conditions (B). OA and lipid conditions maintained CD32b and were also EdU+. LSEC with OA or lipid had statistically significant larger percentages of total events for CD32b+, EdU+, and dual CD32b+/EdU+ populations compared with control (C). Overall CD32b expression in OA and lipid conditions was statistically significantly different from that in untreated cells (**P < 0.01, ††P < 0.001).
Proliferative capabilities were measured using PCNA and EdU (a BrdU analog) incorporation. OA- and lipid-treated cells stained positive for both PCNA and CD32b expression at day 5, whereas untreated cells did not (Fig. 5A). Most cells were PCNA− in the control; those that were PCNA+ were CD32b−. Day 5 cells had higher proportions CD32b+/EdU+ cells in OA compared with control (Fig. 6, A and C). Lipid-treated LSEC did not have statistically significant CD32b+/EdU+ populations over the control. However, this is likely attributed to the culture achieving confluency by days 4 and 5 relative to the OA condition; we were able to obtain a greater number of overall and CD32b+ events for 1% lipid samples than with any other condition. Even when debris was included, we had statistically significant larger populations of distinct double-positive cells following treatment. Combined with immunostaining observations, we can state that PCNA observed in untreated conditions most likely stems from contaminating cell types and/or dedifferentiated LSEC.
Temporal dependence of LSEC on PI3K and MAPK pathways observed at days 3 and 5 in FFA-treated cultures.
Akt and ERK1/2 proteins were probed on days 3 and 5 by Western blotting, because significant phenotypic changes occurred at these times (Fig. 7, A and B). Signaling trends observed for Akt and ERK1/2 were consistent across biological replicates. Phospho-Akt/Akt ratios decreased dramatically by day 5 in OA- and lipid-treated LSEC. Day 3 total and phospho-ERK1/2 levels were similar for all conditions but increased by day 5 in OA- and lipid-treated LSEC. Phospho-ERK/ERK ratios remained relatively unchanged for ERK2 but increased by day 5 for ERK1, indicating ERK1 as the primary contributor to overall phospho-ERK/ERK in OA and lipid cultures. Despite no observable statistical significance for phosphoprotein signals in Western blots, we found a temporal significance with regard to total signaling proteins present at days 3 and 5 compared with control conditions. Total Akt was statistically significant at days 3 (P < 0.05) and 5 for OA conditions (P < 0.05) and at day 5 for lipid conditions (P < 0.05), whereas total ERK1 (p44) was statistically significant at day 5 (P < 0.05) compared with control. Phospho-Akt levels remained relatively constant across all conditions and times, whereas total Akt increased in treated conditions compared with control through day 5.
Fig. 7.
Lipid- and OA-treated LSEC had higher phospho-ERK and phospho-Akt activity. Phospho- and total protein blots were performed for Akt and ERK at days 3 and 5 (representative blot shown in A). Signaling trends observed for Akt and ERK1/2 were consistent across biological replicates. Replicates and pixel intensity data were analyzed using ImageJ and plotted against control after normalization to β-actin values (B). OA and lipid conditions had higher phospho-ERK1/total phospho-ERK1 ratios than in control. Phospho-Akt/total Akt ratios were lower in OA and lipid conditions than in control. Total Akt increased in OA and lipid conditions (*P < 0.05 compared with control at days 3 and 5), whereas total ERK1 increased at day 5 (*P < 0.05 from control).
Inhibition studies were performed using PI3K inhibitor LY-294002 and MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901. Inhibitors did not affect LSEC for the first 24 h of incubation (Figs. 8A and 9A), despite lower concentrations effectively reducing downstream Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 9D). By day 2, 10 μM PI3K inhibitor had adverse effects despite addition of OA or lipid (Fig. 8B and Fig. 9, A–C). Lower PI3K inhibitor concentrations (3 μM) showed similar effects in unsupplemented medium, but cultures with OA or lipid survived whereas only the lipid condition continued to proliferate (Fig. 8B and Fig. 9, B and C). High MEK1/2 inhibitor concentrations only slightly affected OA conditions at day 2 by reducing attached cell number, although culture quality appeared similar to treatments without inhibitor. Lipid cultures did not appear to be perturbed by 1 μM MEK1/2 inhibitor by day 2. MEK1/2 inhibition prevented culture survival after day 4 (Fig. 8, C and D, and Fig. 9C). Lower MEK1/2 inhibitor concentration (0.3 μM) did not vary from the high dose used (P >> 0.05 between all MEK1/2 inhibitor conditions at every time point), indicating LSEC may be more sensitive to changes downstream of MEK1/2 vs. PI3K later in culture.
Fig. 8.
OA and lipid supplement support cultures through early maintenance of low threshold of phospho-Akt followed by late phospho-ERK signaling. Cells were cultured in identical conditions with PI3K inhibitor (LY-294002, 1 or 10 μM) or MEK1/2 inhibitor (PD-0325901, 0.3 or 1 μM) for 7 days. Drug inhibitors had no significant effects on cell cultures following the first day of drug inhibitor treatment (A). Significant cell integrity loss was observed in LSEC with 10 μM PI3K inhibitor, with less pronounced effects in 1 μM PI3K inhibitor by day 2, whereas MEK1/2 inhibitor started to affect OA cultures but not 1% lipid-treated SEC (B). SEC in OA or 1% lipid were able to maintain culture viability by days 4 and beyond in culture despite low PI3K inhibitor concentrations (C and D). MEK1/2 inhibitor did eventually affect lipid-treated SEC by day 4 (C), although many cells managed to survive in low MEK1/2 inhibitor concentrations. No SEC remained by day 7 of culture with MEK1/2 inhibitor, whereas low PI3K inhibitor SEC treated with either OA or 1% lipid recovered (D). Scale bar, 100 μm. MEKi, MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901; PI3Ki, PI3K inhibitor LY-294002.
Fig. 9.
OA and lipid supplement support cultures through early maintenance of low threshold of phospho-Akt followed by late phospho-ERK signaling. Intact cell body counts show temporal difference in Akt and ERK signaling (A–C). Low PI3K inhibitor delayed LSEC recovery in OA and lipid conditions, whereas high concentrations prevented culture recovery as early as day 2. After PI3K inhibition, the OA condition was eventually unable to rescue the culture entirely, because the culture declined after day 5. Delays in intact cell loss were observed for low and high MEK inhibition until day 3 in lipid conditions, and LSEC did not recover at later times following MEK inhibition. Although control conditions contained many intact cell bodies, cells had granular morphology of dead cells observed in Fig. 2. Western blots show PI3K and MEK1/2 inhibitors effectively reduced phosphoprotein signals within the first 24 h of treatment (D). C, control; L, 1% lipid.
DISCUSSION
To test our hypothesis on the requirement of lipids to maintain LSEC viability, we evaluated several different types of lipids in both regular and FFA-free BSA. FFA-free BSA permitted individual testing of lipids for effects on LSEC culture, since native albumin exists bound to a variety of FFAs (4). By day 5, we observed that LSEC cultured with FFAs maintained metabolic and endocytic activity and proliferated to confluency. The particular form of lipids delivered to LSEC was important, since membrane lipids PC and LPC did not maintain viability. PC and LPC can facilitate cell signaling and stimulate proliferation in many cell types (2, 42) but did not maintain LSEC in culture. We observed that OA alone was insufficient for supporting long-term culture in FFA-free BSA, although OA could recapitulate the lipid supplement effects in regular BSA. In comparison, the 1% lipid supplement, a cocktail of saturated and unsaturated FFAs, was able to support LSEC viability regardless of the BSA used, affirming the necessity for a variety of FFAs to sustain survival and proliferation.
A hallmark of LSEC is the presence of fenestrae, which were maintained in both OA and lipid samples on day 5. Of the few living cells remaining in the control, none were found to possess fenestrae, consistent with previous findings that fenestrae disappear within the first 48 h of culture (7). Additional evaluation with CD32b phenotype marker validated findings that surviving LSEC in lipid or OA maintained differentiation by expressing this marker, one specific to liver sinusoidal endothelium (37). Along with CD32b expression, we also looked at the proliferative capacity of LSEC, since no previous studies have explicitly reported that differentiated rat LSEC can undergo proliferation. We successfully demonstrated that differentiated LSEC undergo proliferation, via nuclear PCNA expression and EdU incorporation, when treated with FFAs. Despite maintenance of several phenotypic characteristics in prolonged cultures, we did observe degradation of some markers. Although fenestrae arranged in sieve plates were observed, they were not abundant in OA- and lipid-treated cultures, and a large percentage of these LSEC no longer exhibited fenestrae by day 5. Many cells in the FFA-treated condition processed large transcytotic pores >1 μm in diameter. These may be the remnants of sieve plates that have degraded or fenestrae that have fused. We noticed that although LSEC still expressed CD32b, the presence was diffuse and overall fluorescence intensity was lower than for freshly isolated LSEC (Fig. 5C). Other studies have reported sharper declines in specific LSEC phenotype markers during culture, mostly associated with the dedifferentiation process, recently reported to involve Leda-1 (24, 37). We suspect that lipid-treated LSEC maintain a state of differentiation that allows them to persist and proliferate in vitro, but they do not maintain physiological levels of CD32b antigen or fenestrations.
In LSEC we observed that phospho-Akt/Akt levels decreased in FFA conditions as time progressed, whereas the inverse occurred with phospho-ERK/ERK, primarily by ERK1. From these observations and inhibitor studies, we believe low threshold levels of phospho-Akt are required for cell survival between days 2 and 3. At this point, high concentrations of PI3K inhibitor LY-294002 abolished the beneficial effects that OA and 1% lipid have on LSEC, whereas lower concentrations did not affect cultures. Beyond 3 days, cells in low PI3K inhibitor could proliferate and recover, albeit not to the level seen in uninhibited samples. Granular morphology appeared earlier, at day 2 (as opposed to day 3 in control samples without inhibitor), in untreated samples with PI3K inhibitor. This may indicate that downstream signals of PI3K are closely associated with cell survival during this time. Past day 3, MEK1/2 inhibition was fatal to cultures, since LSEC did not survive or proliferate regardless of the concentration of MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901 added to cultures. Interestingly, OA- and lipid-treated cultured LSEC did not have a significant dependence on MAPK before this time, because 10 μM inhibitor only slightly affected the number of cells in culture. At early time points, MEK1/2 inhibition also prevented LSEC from undergoing the increased spreading seen with FFA treatments. As such, MAPK signaling may be partially responsible for the morphology change induced by FFAs before day 3 but required afterward for survival and proliferation.
Although it is understood that ECM, cell-cell contacts (37), and paracrine/autocrine signaling (17) are absolutely vital to achieve functional LSEC, consideration of the role of lipids is important given the results of this study. Effects of FFAs on LSEC can have several implications on liver pathophysiology. In general, lipids are crucial for survival for all mammalian cells as energy substrates, membrane lipid bases, and for influencing cell signal processes (3). Concentrations of FFAs in circulation can vary dramatically depending on the metabolic state but have been reported to be anywhere between 10 μM and 1 mM in human plasma, although generally within the range of 200–600 μM (25, 44, 45). Approximately 150 μM total plasma FFA is taken up in the liver, of which about 50 μM is composed of OA (and is recapitulated in our experimental conditions) (25, 30). The liver is the primary organ responsible for lipid metabolism as 75% of the blood that enters into the liver arrives from the intestine, which absorbs lipids from the gut or lipolysis from adipose tissue (10). Thus FFAs are likely to have a profound influence on LSEC. Past studies have shown that polyunsaturated FFAs can protect hepatocytes from superoxide radicals (49), whereas bioactive lipids such as sphingosine 1-phosphate provide oxidative protection to LSEC following liver injury (57). In contrast, studies also argue for the presence of lipids as precursors to chronic disease, apoptosis, steatosis, and insulin resistance/diabetes (1, 33, 35, 36). For example, caveolin-1 is important to lipid metabolism during liver regeneration but may also implicate a role of pathogenesis in LSEC, since it is upregulated in dedifferentiating cells (8, 10, 50). Moreover, we observed that cocultures of hepatocytes and LSEC induce hepatic cell death in lipid conditions, suggesting concentrations beneficial to LSEC can be lipotoxic for hepatocytes (data not shown).
OA and other unsaturated FFAs have been reported to have numerous effects on metabolically active cells, although the main mechanisms of OA and other FFA incorporation are still not fully understood. OA has been found to participate in cross talk with EGF receptor and other pathways by affecting MAPK and PI3K (12, 13, 52, 53, 55, 56). However, much of the data from previous studies are contradictory in either stimulating or inhibiting these pathways dependent on the system being studied.
Unsaturated FFAs have been found to be able to protect against oxidative stress by reducing lipid peroxidation and inhibiting the inflammatory pathway NF-κB, which can lead to endothelial cell activation (9, 11, 15, 39). Thus OA may prevent oxidative stress in LSEC that decreases ERK1/2 activity (38, 48), thereby allowing cells to resume cell survival and proliferation after day 3. This would be in agreement with the results we observed in increased phospho-ERK1/2 activity. Furthermore, increased saturated to unsaturated fatty acid levels are strongly correlated with insulin resistance and decreased glucose production in the liver (33, 36). The introduction of more unsaturated FA into the system may facilitate insulin signaling and activation of phospho-Akt for cell survival in our early time points. Although it is most likely that FFAs indirectly modulate proteomic responses via metabolic pathways, we observed distinct changes in phosphoprotein signaling pathways. We could directly influence viability in OA- and lipid-treated LSEC by inhibiting PI3K and MAPK pathways, showing a temporal shift in phosphoprotein signaling dependence from PI3K to MAPK.
Our results implicate the underlying importance of FFAs in the basic function of LSEC, because FFAs modulate LSEC phenotype, survival, and proliferation in the absence of serum. Changes in the FFA profile due to shifts in systemic or dietary delivery to the liver can potentially result in LSEC dysfunction, leading to oxidative stress and activation of inflammatory pathways. In addition, decreases in unsaturated FFA (and increase in saturated FFA) could lead to steatosis and insulin resistance. As such, lipid balance in the liver is required to prevent onset of disease. We demonstrated that LSEC monocultures can maintain their unique phenotype in culture through at least 5 days of culture and were concomitantly proliferating. Our chemically defined media system provides an in vitro platform to effectively move forward in understanding the phenomena involved in LSEC biology.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant EFRI-0735997 (to D. A. Lauffenburger), an NSF Graduate Student Fellowship, and National Institutes of Health Grants CA076541 (to D. B. Stolz) and R01 GM069668 (to D. A. Lauffenburger).
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: T.-C.H., D.A.L., L.G.G., and D.B.S. conception and design of research; T.-C.H. performed experiments; T.-C.H., D.A.L., L.G.G., and D.B.S. analyzed data; T.-C.H., D.A.L., L.G.G., and D.B.S. interpreted results of experiments; T.-C.H. and D.B.S. prepared figures; T.-C.H. and D.B.S. drafted manuscript; T.-C.H. and D.B.S. edited and revised manuscript; T.-C.H., D.A.L., L.G.G., and D.B.S. approved final version of manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Laura Vineyard, Ryan Littrell, Rachel Pothier, and Yasuko Toshimitsu for performing rat liver perfusions; Lorenna Buck and Megan Palmer for help with flow cytometry; Tharathorn Rimchala for advice in image quantitation; and Jonathan Franks for scanning electron microscopy processing. We also thank Abhinav Arneja, Benjamin Cosgrove, Shannon Alford, Kristen Naegle, Melody Morris, Sarah Kolitz, and Ajit Dash for helpful discussions and suggestions.
REFERENCES
- 1. Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 346: 1221–1231, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bassa BV, Noh JW, Ganji SH, Shin MK, Roh DD, Kamanna VS. Lysophosphatidylcholine stimulates EGF receptor activation and mesangial cell proliferation: regulatory role of Src and PKC. Biochim Biophys Acta 1771: 1364–1371, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Berk PD, Stump DD. Mechanisms of cellular uptake of long chain free fatty acids. Mol Cell Biochem 192: 17–31, 1999 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bojesen IN, Bojesen E. Binding of arachidonate and oleate to bovine serum albumin. J Lipid Res 35: 770–778, 1994 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bolt HM. Vinyl chloride-a classical industrial toxicant of new interest. Crit Rev Toxicol 35: 307–323, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Braet F, De Zanger R, Sasaoki T, Baekeland M, Janssens P, Smedsrod B, Wisse E. Assessment of a method of isolation, purification, and cultivation of rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Lab Invest 70: 944–952, 1994 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Braet F, Wisse E. Structural and functional aspects of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell fenestrae: a review. Comp Hepatol 1: 1, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brasaemle DL. Cell biology. A metabolic push to proliferate. Science 313: 1581–1582, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brooks JD, Musiek ES, Koestner TR, Stankowski JN, Howard JR, Brunoldi EM, Porta A, Zanoni G, Vidari G, Morrow JD, Milne GL, McLaughlin B. The fatty acid oxidation product 15-A(3t)-isoprostane is a potent inhibitor of NFkappaB transcription and macrophage transformation. J Neurochem 119: 614–616, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Canbay A, Bechmann L, Gerken G. Lipid metabolism in the liver. Z Gastroenterol 45: 35–41, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Carluccio MA, Massaro M, Bonfrate C, Siculella L, Maffia M, Nicolardi G, Distante A, Storelli C, De Caterina R. Oleic acid inhibits endothelial activation: a direct vascular antiatherogenic mechanism of a nutritional component in the Mediterranean diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19: 220–228, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Casabiell X, Zugaza JL, Pombo CM, Pandiella A, Casanueva FF. Oleic acid blocks epidermal growth factor-activated early intracellular signals without altering the ensuing mitogenic response. Exp Cell Res 205: 365–373, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Collins QF, Xiong Y, Lupo EG, Jr, Liu HY, Cao W. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates free fatty acid-induced gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 281: 24336–24344, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Daneker GW, Lund SA, Caughman SW, Swerlick RA, Fischer AH, Staley CA, Ades EW. Culture and characterization of sinusoidal endothelial cells isolated from human liver. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34: 370–377, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. De Caterina R, Spiecker M, Solaini G, Basta G, Bosetti F, Libby P, Liao J. The inhibition of endothelial activation by unsaturated fatty acids. Lipids 34, Suppl: S191–S194, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. DeLeve LD. Hepatic microvasculature in liver injury. Semin Liver Dis 27: 390–400, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. DeLeve LD, Wang X, Hu L, McCuskey MK, McCuskey RS. Rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cell phenotype is maintained by paracrine and autocrine regulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 287: G757–G763, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. DeLeve LD, Wang X, McCuskey MK, McCuskey RS. Rat liver endothelial cells isolated by anti-CD31 immunomagnetic separation lack fenestrae and sieve plates. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 291: G1187–G1189, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Domansky K, Inman W, Serdy J, Dash A, Lim MH, Griffith LG. Perfused multiwell plate for 3D liver tissue engineering. Lab Chip 10: 51–58, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Elvevold K, Nedredal GI, Revhaug A, Bertheussen K, Smedsrod B. Long-term preservation of high endocytic activity in primary cultures of pig liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 84: 749–764, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Elvevold K, Smedsrod B, Martinez I. The liver sinusoidal endothelial cell: a cell type of controversial and confusing identity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 294: G391–G400, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Elvevold KH, Nedredal GI, Revhaug A, Smedsrod B. Scavenger properties of cultivated pig liver endothelial cells. Comp Hepatol 3: 4, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Enomoto K, Nishikawa Y, Omori Y, Tokairin T, Yoshida M, Ohi N, Nishimura T, Yamamoto Y, Li Q. Cell biology and pathology of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Med Electron Microsc 37: 208–215, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Geraud C, Schledzewski K, Demory A, Klein D, Kaus M, Peyre F, Sticht C, Evdokimov K, Lu S, Schmieder A, Goerdt S. Liver sinusoidal endothelium: a microenvironment-dependent differentiation program in rat including the novel junctional protein liver endothelial differentiation-associated protein-1. Hepatology 52: 313–326, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hagenfeldt L, Wahren J, Pernow B, Raf L. Uptake of individual free fatty acids by skeletal muscle and liver in man. J Clin Invest 51: 2324–2330, 1972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hansen B, Longati P, Elvevold K, Nedredal GI, Schledzewski K, Olsen R, Falkowski M, Kzhyshkowska J, Carlsson F, Johansson S, Smedsrod B, Goerdt S, McCourt P. Stabilin-1 and stabilin-2 are both directed into the early endocytic pathway in hepatic sinusoidal endothelium via interactions with clathrin/AP-2, independent of ligand binding. Exp Cell Res 303: 160–173, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hwa AJ, Fry RC, Sivaraman A, So PT, Samson LD, Stolz DB, Griffith LG. Rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells survive without exogenous VEGF in 3D perfused co-cultures with hepatocytes. FASEB J 21: 2564–2579, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Irving MG, Roll FJ, Huang S, Bissell DM. Characterization and culture of sinusoidal endothelium from normal rat liver: lipoprotein uptake and collagen phenotype. Gastroenterology 87: 1233–1247, 1984 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nat Biotechnol 26: 120–126, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kokatnur MG, Oalmann MC, Johnson WD, Malcom GT, Strong JP. Fatty acid composition of human adipose tissue from two anatomical sites in a biracial community. Am J Clin Nutr 32: 2198–2205, 1979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Krause P, Markus PM, Schwartz P, Unthan-Fechner K, Pestel S, Fandrey J, Probst I. Hepatocyte-supported serum-free culture of rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. J Hepatol 32: 718–726, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lalor PF, Lai WK, Curbishley SM, Shetty S, Adams DH. Human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells can be distinguished by expression of phenotypic markers related to their specialised functions in vivo. World J Gastroenterol 12: 5429–5439, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Leclercq IA, Da Silva Morais A, Schroyen B, Van Hul N, Geerts A. Insulin resistance in hepatocytes and sinusoidal liver cells: mechanisms and consequences. J Hepatol 47: 142–156, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Li R, Oteiza A, Sorensen KK, McCourt P, Olsen R, Smedsrod B, Svistounov D. Role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and stabilins in elimination of oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300: G71–G81, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Malhi H, Barreyro FJ, Isomoto H, Bronk SF, Gores GJ. Free fatty acids sensitise hepatocytes to TRAIL mediated cytotoxicity. Gut 56: 1124–1131, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Manco M, Mingrone G, Greco AV, Capristo E, Gniuli D, De Gaetano A, Gasbarrini G. Insulin resistance directly correlates with increased saturated fatty acids in skeletal muscle triglycerides. Metabolism 49: 220–224, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. March S, Hui EE, Underhill GH, Khetani S, Bhatia SN. Microenvironmental regulation of the sinusoidal endothelial cell phenotype in vitro. Hepatology 50: 920–928, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Martinez I, Nedredal GI, Oie CI, Warren A, Johansen O, Le Couteur DG, Smedsrod B. The influence of oxygen tension on the structure and function of isolated liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Comp Hepatol 7: 4, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Massaro M, De Caterina R. Vasculoprotective effects of oleic acid: epidemiological background and direct vascular antiatherogenic properties. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 12: 42–51, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Nagelkerke JF, Barto KP, van Berkel TJ. In vivo and in vitro uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein by rat liver endothelial, Kupffer, and parenchymal cells. J Biol Chem 258: 12221–12227, 1983 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Netland PA, Zetter BR, Via DP, Voyta JC. In situ labelling of vascular endothelium with fluorescent acetylated low density lipoprotein. Histochem J 17: 1309–1320, 1985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Nolan CJ, Madiraju MS, Delghingaro-Augusto V, Peyot ML, Prentki M. Fatty acid signaling in the beta-cell and insulin secretion. Diabetes 55, Suppl 2: S16–S23, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Nonaka H, Tanaka M, Suzuki K, Miyajima A. Development of murine hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells characterized by the expression of hyaluronan receptors. Dev Dyn 236: 2258–2267, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Richieri GV, Kleinfeld AM. Unbound free fatty acid levels in human serum. J Lipid Res 36: 229–240, 1995 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Seppala-Lindroos A, Vehkavaara S, Hakkinen AM, Goto T, Westerbacka J, Sovijarvi A, Halavaara J, Yki-Jarvinen H. Fat accumulation in the liver is associated with defects in insulin suppression of glucose production and serum free fatty acids independent of obesity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3023–3028, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shults MD, Janes KA, Lauffenburger DA, Imperiali B. A multiplexed homogeneous fluorescence-based assay for protein kinase activity in cell lysates. Nat Methods 2: 277–283, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sivaraman A, Leach JK, Townsend S, Iida T, Hogan BJ, Stolz DB, Fry R, Samson LD, Tannenbaum SR, Griffith LG. A microscale in vitro physiological model of the liver: predictive screens for drug metabolism and enzyme induction. Curr Drug Metab 6: 569–591, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Smathers RL, Galligan JJ, Stewart BJ, Petersen DR. Overview of lipid peroxidation products and hepatic protein modification in alcoholic liver disease. Chem Biol Interact 192: 107–112, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Sohma R, Takahashi M, Takada H, Kuwayama H. Protective effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid on primary culture of rat hepatocytes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22: 1965–1970, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Straub AC, Stolz DB, Ross MA, Hernandez-Zavala A, Soucy NV, Klei LR, Barchowsky A. Arsenic stimulates sinusoidal endothelial cell capillarization and vessel remodeling in mouse liver. Hepatology 45: 205–212, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sung JH, Esch MB, Shuler ML. Integration of in silico and in vitro platforms for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 6: 1063–1081, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Vacaresse N, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Auge N, Suc I, Frisach MF, Salvayre R, Negre-Salvayre A. Activation of epithelial growth factor receptor pathway by unsaturated fatty acids. Circ Res 85: 892–899, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Vinciguerra M, Veyrat-Durebex C, Moukil MA, Rubbia-Brandt L, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Foti M. PTEN down-regulation by unsaturated fatty acids triggers hepatic steatosis via an NF-kappaBp65/mTOR-dependent mechanism. Gastroenterology 134: 268–280, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Voyta JC, Via DP, Butterfield CE, Zetter BR. Identification and isolation of endothelial cells based on their increased uptake of acetylated-low density lipoprotein. J Cell Biol 99: 2034–2040, 1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wang XL, Zhang L, Youker K, Zhang MX, Wang J, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS, Shen YH. Free fatty acids inhibit insulin signaling-stimulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation through upregulating PTEN or inhibiting Akt kinase. Diabetes 55: 2301–2310, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yonezawa T, Haga S, Kobayashi Y, Katoh K, Obara Y. Unsaturated fatty acids promote proliferation via ERK1/2 and Akt pathway in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 367: 729–735, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zheng DM, Kitamura T, Ikejima K, Enomoto N, Yamashina S, Suzuki S, Takei Y, Sato N. Sphingosine 1-phosphate protects rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells from ethanol-induced apoptosis: role of intracellular calcium and nitric oxide. Hepatology 44: 1278–1287, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






