Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutrition. 2011 Nov 12;28(4):372–377. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.07.020

IMPACT OF BARBECUED MEAT CONSUMED IN PREGNANCY ON BIRTH OUTCOMES ACCOUNTING FOR PERSONAL PRENATAL EXPOSURE TO AIRBORNE POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS. BIRTH COHORT STUDY IN POLAND

Wieslaw Jedrychowski 1, Frederica P Perera 2, Deliang Tang 2, Laura Stigter 2, Elzbieta Mroz 1, Elzbieta Flak 1, John Spengler 3, Dorota Budzyn-Mrozek 1, Irena Kaim 4, Ryszard Jacek 1
PMCID: PMC3288524  NIHMSID: NIHMS319140  PMID: 22079395

Abstract

We previously reported an association between prenatal exposure to airborne PAH and lower birth weight, birth length and head circumference. The main goal of the present analysis was to assess the possible impact of co-exposure to PAH-containing of barbecued meat consumed during pregnancy on birth outcomes.

The birth cohort consisted of 432 pregnant women who gave birth at term (>36 weeks of gestation). Only non-smoking women with singleton pregnancies, 18-35 years of age, and who were free from chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension were included in the study. Detailed information on diet over pregnancy was collected through interviews and the measurement of exposure to airborne PAHs was carried out by personal air monitoring during the second trimester of pregnancy. The effect of barbecued meat consumption on birth outcomes (birthweight, length and head circumference at birth) was adjusted in multiple linear regression models for potential confounding factors such as prenatal exposure to airborne PAHs, child’s sex, gestational age, parity, size of mother (maternal prepregnancy weight, weight gain in pregnancy) and prenatal environmental tobacco smoke (ETS).

The multivariable regression model showed a significant deficit in birthweight associated with barbecued meat consumption in pregnancy (coeff = −106.0 g; 95%CI: −293.3, −35.8); The effect of exposure to airborne PAHs was about the same magnitude order (coeff. = −164.6 g; 95%CI: −172.3, − 34.7). Combined effect of both sources of exposure amounted to birth weight deficit of 214.3 g (95%CI: −419.0, − 9.6). Regression models performed for birth length and head circumference showed similar trends but the estimated effects were of borderline significance level. As the intake of barbecued meat did not affect the duration of pregnancy, the reduced birthweight could not have been mediated by shortened gestation period.

In conclusion, the study results provided epidemiologic evidence that prenatal PAH exposure from diet including grilled meat might be hazardous for fetal development.

Keywords: barbecued meat, pregnancy, birth weight, birth cohort study

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) being widely present in the human environment pose health risks as some of them, such as benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) or benzo[a]anthracene are classified as “probably carcinogenic” to humans. PAH compounds are generated in the course of processing of coal, crude oil and natural gas (1). They are inhaled with outdoor and indoor pollutants generated by incomplete burning of oil and gas used for heating, vehicle transportation and tobacco smoking. However, diet is a major source of exposure to PAH for an adult person (26), which is estimated to contribute to about 70 - 90% of total exposure (2, 7).

A high contribution of PAH exposure from the alimentary tract results to a great extent from the fact that cooking foods at high temperatures (grilling, roasting, frying) generate large amounts of PAHs (8 - 10). While grilling, meat or its products are cooked over dry heat from open fire, and the term “barbecue” is traditionally applied to a cooking method, where grilling fire comes from smoking wood. When food is in direct contact with flame, pyrolysis of fats in the meat and smoke of hot charcoal generate great amounts of PAHs, that mostly accumulate in the outer surface of the barbecued meat (9, 10). Other minor sources of exposure to PAHs are ingestion of house dust, or dermal absorption from contaminated soil and water (11, 12).

After being absorbed into the human body, PAH compounds are distributed to almost all internal organs and are transferred through the placenta to the fetus (13, 14) where they are metabolized to form a number of metabolites that may bind to DNA to form a moiety called PAH-DNA adducts. The formation of PAH-DNA adducts can alter DNA replication and may be associated with an increased risk of several forms of cancer (15, 16).

Reproductive epidemiology provides solid evidence that the developing fetus and infants are significantly more sensitive to environmental toxicants than adults. This is due to differential exposure, physiologic immaturity, and a longer lifetime over which disease initiated in the early life can develop. It was shown that newborns and young children are especially vulnerable to the toxic effects of airborne PAH in terms of birth outcomes (17 - 21). Most importantly, it was recently documented that prenatal exposure to airborne PAH may also have an effect on the future cognitive development of children (22).

The main goal of the present analysis is to assess the possible relationship between meat prepared by different cooking methods consumed during pregnancy and birth outcomes, after accounting for individual prenatal exposure to airborne PAH measured in the second trimester of pregnancy together with other potential confounders such as child’s sex, gestational age, parity, size of mother (maternal prepregnancy weight, weight gain in pregnancy) and prenatal environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). The secondary goal of the study was to assess the effect of barbecued meat consumption in pregnancy on the level of cord blood B[a]P-DNA adducts, which is believed to be a molecular dosimeter of PAH compounds and can serve as a proxy for PAH-DNA adducts.

Material and methods

This study is part of an ongoing, longitudinal investigation of the health effects of prenatal exposure to outdoor and indoor air pollution on infants and children in Krakow, Poland. As described previously (23), between January 2001 and February 2004, we recruited a total of 505 women registered at prenatal healthcare clinics in the central area of Krakow, where they had also lived for at least a year preceding screening. Each woman visiting the prenatal clinic because of her pregnancy received a letter of introduction and a short screening questionnaire to find whether the eligibility criteria are met. Eligibility criteria included: age ≥ 18 years, non-smoking, singleton pregnancies, no current occupational exposure to known developmental toxicants, no history of illicit drug use, pregnancy-related diabetes, or hypertension.

A total of 432 pregnant women who gave birth between January 2001 and February 2004 met these criteria and gave birth to term babies (>36 weeks of gestation), Upon enrollment, a detailed questionnaire was administered to each subject at the entry to the study and in the third trimester to gather demographic data and information on house characteristics, date of the last menstrual period (LMP), medical and reproductive history, occupational hazards, alcohol consumption, and smoking practices of others present in the home. The questionnaires also elicited detailed information on dietary PAHs (specifically, the frequency of grilled, broiled, fried, or smoked meat consumption during each trimester of pregnancy). Prenatal ETS exposure was assessed by questionnaire data and cord blood cotinine measurements.

After giving birth, maternal and hospital records were reviewed to obtain data on delivery complications. Weight, length, and head circumference at birth were recorded for all infants. Gestational age at birth was defined as the interval between the last day of the mother’s LMP and the date of birth. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Jagiellonian University.

Air monitoring

Study participants were monitored for personal exposure to airborne PAHs during the second trimester of pregnancy using a personal environmental monitoring sampler (PEMS) measuring particles and gases developed at Harvard School of Public Health. Details of the personal air monitoring conducted in Krakow have been published earlier (23). Briefly, on completion of the interview, the women were given a backpack containing a portable air monitor to be worn during the day and kept near the bed at night during a consecutive 48-hr period. The sampling pump draws air through a polyurethane (PUF) sampler to measure PAH. After sampling, the field samplers were frozen and shipped on dry ice to Southwest Research Institute in Texas. Personal air monitoring data were given a quality assurance (QA) score (0-3) for flow rate, flow time, and completeness of documentation (24). Final QA score of 0 (highest quality) or 1 (high quality) was required for inclusion. Air samples were analyzed at Southwest research Institute for levels of pyrene and eight carcinogeneic PAHs. Determination of total PAH concentration (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b) fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i) perylene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene/iso-chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, and pyrene) in extracts was performed. Chemical procedures in the analysis of the collected samples were described elsewhere (25). In the present analysis, only total PAH measurements were considered.

Dosimetry of PAH-DNA adducts

Maternal blood (30–35 mL) was collected within 1 day postpartum, and umbilical cord blood (30–60 mL) was collected at delivery. Samples were transported to the laboratory immediately after collection. The buffy coat, packed red blood cells, and plasma were separated and stored at −70°C. BaP-DNA adducts in extracted WBC DNA white blood cells were analyzed using the HPLC-fluorescence method of Alexandrov et al. (26), which detects BaP tetraols. The assay gives zero values when unexposed calf thymus DNA is tested (D. Tang, personal communication). The method has a variation coefficient of 12% and a lower limit of detection of 0.125 adducts per 108 nucleotides. HPLC analysis of DNA samples for BaP-DNA adducts was performed in batches, with 18-paired maternal and newborn samples in the same batch.

Dosimetry of cord blood cotinine

In cord blood samples the serum cotinine concentration was measured at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using a sensitive isotope-dilution high-performance liquid chromatographic/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) procedure. Limits of detection (LOD) were set below 0.05 ng/mL. About 20% of specimens had cotinine levels below the LOD. For statistical analysis, samples with non-detectable levels were assigned a value of 0.025, midway between the LOD of 0.05 and 0. Maternal blood cotinine level below 15.0 ng/mL was considered the borderline separating smokers from nonsmokers (27, 28).

Statistical methods

The main birth outcomes were birthweight, length, and head circumference at birth; and their association with exposure was examined by univariate and multivariate models. Several models were constructed. Following estimation of crude effects. in multivariable linear regression models, the impact of the consumption of barbecued meat on the birth outcomes was adjusted for potential confounders (airborne PAHs, child’s sex, gestational age, parity, maternal prepregnancy weight, weight gain in pregnancy and prenatal environmental tobacco smoke). In all statistical analyses, the significance level was set at p<0.05. All statistical analyses have been performed with STATA version 11.1 software.

Results

Analysis of personal air samples from 432 pregnant women included in the study showed that PAHs exposure (expressed in geometric means) in the second trimester of pregnancy averaged 26.05 ng/m3 (95%CI: 23.3 - 29.1 ng/m3 and for B[a]P, 2.7 ng/m3 (95%CI: 2.4 - 3.1). There was perfect correlation between total PAH and B[a]P concentrations (rho = 0.99).

The mean weight, length, head circumference at birth and gestational age for term babies under study were 3456.7 g, 54.8 cm, 33.9 cm and 39.6 weeks, respectively. The newborns of mothers who consumed any barbecued meat in the third pregnancy trimester showed significantly lower birthweight by 189.4 g, and shorter length at birth (of border significance) by 0.82 cm. The corresponding reduction in head circumference was 0.4 cm, also of border significance (Table 1). Those subjects who consumed barbecued meat were exposed to much lower airborne PAHs concentrations and it resulted from the fact that majority of them (73%) lived in the city areas with lower pollution level. The correlation between barbecued meat and airborne PAH was insignificant.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study sample (term babies) by the consumption of barbecued meat in the third trimester of pregnancy

Variables Total sample Consumption of barbecued
meat in the 3rd trimester
of pregnancy
P-level for
difference
N= 432 No (n=384) Yes (n=48)
Mother’s age: mean 27.57 27.52 27.96 0.4186
SD 3.55 3.60 3.10
Maternal education (yrs of schooling):
mean 15.57 15.58 15.42 0.6980
SD 2.80 2.79 2.89
Mother’s height (cm): mean 165.0 165.1 164.3 0.3389
SD 5.560 5.620 5.052
Mother’s prepregnancy weight (kg):
mean 58.15 58.17 57.98 0.8832
SD 8.669 8.632 9.057
Maternal weight gain in prepregnancy
(kg):

mean

15.41

15.48

14.90

0.4552
SD 5.095 5.054 5.443
Gestational age:
(weeks) > 36
mean 39.57 39.58 39.50 0.6297
SD 1.127 1.128 1.130
Birth order:  1 n (%) 272 (63.0) 244 (63.5) 28 (58.3) 0.5851
       ≥ 2 n (%) 160 (37.0) 140 (36.5) 20 (41.7)
Gender of baby:  Boys n (%) 221 (51.2) 200 (52.1) 21 (43.7) 0.3494
          Girls n (%) 211 (48.8) 184 (47.9) 27 (56.2)
Birth weight (g): mean 3456.7 3477.7 3288.3 0.0048
SD 439.57 436.14 435.08
Length at birth (cm): mean 54.75 54.84 54.02 0.0437
SD 2.659 2.648 2.662
Head circumference at birth(cm): mean 33.94 33.99 33.58 0.0559
SD 1.388 1.375 1.456
PAH total (ng/m3): mean 52.22 55.25 28.02 0.0073
SD 66.45 68.23 43.44
Benzo(a)pyrene (ng/m3): mean 6.574 6.983 3.299 0.0056
SD 8.707 8.905 6.062
Maternal blood adducts: mean 0.262 0.266 0.230 0.0596
SD 0.120 0.121 0.109
Missing date 15 13 2
Cord blood adducts: mean 0.271 0.270 0.284 0.5457
SD 0.153 0.135 0.254
Missing date 42 39 3
Prenatal ETS (+) n (%) 114 (26.4) 100 (26.0) 14 (29.2) 0.7722
Consumption of barbecued meat in the
2nd trimester of pregnancy (y/n)
n (%) 112 (25.9) 96 (25.0) 16 (33.3) 0.2858

In the univariate analysis of the relationship between birth outcomes and the consumption of barbecued, roasted, fried and smoked meats in the various trimesters of pregnancy the nonparametric trend tests were used (Table 2). It has been shown that out of all individual food items considered, only barbecued meat consumed in the third trimester of pregnancy was significantly and inversely correlated with birthweight (z = −1.99, p = 0.047). Similar but insignificant trends were observed between other birth outcomes (length at birth and head circumference) and the consumption of barbecued meat in the last trimester of pregnancy.

Table 2.

Relation between birthweight and the frequency of barbecued, roasted, fried and smoked foods consumed over pregnancy trimesters (nonparametric trend)

Type of foods First two trimesters of
pregnancy
Third trimester of
pregnancy
Whole pregnancy
Barbecued meat Z = −1.20, p= 0.230 Z = −1.99, p=0.047 Z= − 1.78, p= 0.075
Barbecued fish Z = 0.36, p = 0.719 Z = −1.61, p= 0.107 Z = −0.67, p = 0.506
Total barbecued food Z = −1.02, p = 0.307 Z = −2.05, p = 0.040 Z = − 1.76, p = 0.079
Roasted meat Z = 0.11, p = 0.911 Z = 0.91, p= 0.363 Z = 0.51, p = 0.608
Roasted fish Z = 0.96, p = 0.355 Z = 1.47, p = 0.141 Z = 1.52, p = 0.127
Total roasted food Z = 0.30, p = 0.762 Z = 1.22, p = 0.222 Z = 0.82, p = 0.414
Fried meat Z = 1.15, p = 0.248 Z = 0.08, p = 0.935 Z = 0.87, p = 0.363
Fried fish Z = − 0.33, p = 0.742 Z = −1.39, p = 0.165 Z = −0.91, p = 0.363
Total fried food Z = 0.90, p = 0.366 Z = −.090, p = 0.366 Z = 0.46, p = 0.645
Smoked meat Z = −2.88, p = 0.004 Z = 1.44, p = 0.151 Z = −1.05, p = 0.296
Smoked fish Z = 1.44, p = 0.150 Z = 0.27, p= 0.791 Z = 1,18, p = 0.236
Smoked cheese Z = −.0.04, p = 969 Z = −1.18, p = 0.238 Z = −0.60, p = 0.550
Total smoked food Z = −1.39, p = 0.165 Z = 0.85, p = 0.393 Z = −.053, p = 0.598

There was a significant positive association between the level of the airborne PAHs (in tertiles) and cord blood adducts (non-parametric trend z = 3.43, p = 0.001) and a border significant association for maternal blood adducts and the airborne PAHs (z = 1.68, p = 0.092). However, the association between cord or maternal blood adducts and the consumption of barbecued, roasted, fried and smoked meats in various trimesters of pregnancy appeared to be insignificant.

For each birth outcome a separate model was constructed in which independent variables beside airborne exposure to PAH (dichotomized by median) included gender of child, parity, anthropometry of mother, gestational age, and ETS measured by cord blood cotinine. While the effect of prenatal airborne PAH exposure (above median value) adjusted for a wide set of confounders amounted to birthweight deficit of 106 g, the separate effect of ingested dietary PAH component resulted in birthweight deficit of 165 g. The estimated combined exposure to both sources of PAHs produced the birthweight deficit of 214 g. (Table 3). Out of the total variability in birthweight (39%) estimated from the multivariable model regression model, 1.3% could be attributed to prenatal airborne PAHs exposure, 0.9% to ETS exposure, and 0.8% to the consumption of grilled meat. The major variability in birthweight was explained by gestational age (13.4%), weight gain in pregnancy (7.9%), prepregnancy weight (7.3%), baby’s sex (3.9%) and parity (3.3%).

Table 3.

Estimated effect of barbecued meat consumed over the third trimester of pregnancy on birthweight adjusted for airborne PAHs and other potential confounders (multivariable linear regression model, N = 432, R-squared = 0.39

Predictors Coeff. t P>t [95% Conf. Interval]
Maternal age −4.50 −0.78 0.435 −15.80 6.81
Maternal education (in years) 13.47 1.95 0.052 −0.11 27.04
Gestational age (weeks) 140.38 9.20 0.000 110.39 170.38
Maternal weight gain in pregnancy (kg) 26.48 7.63 0.000 19.65 33.30
Prepregnancy maternal weight (kg) 14.72 7.47 0.000 10.85 18.59
Child’s sex (girls) −189.93 −5.52 0.000 −257.62 −122.24
Parity 103.63 3.40 0.001 43.64 163.63
Cord cotinine (lg) −56.52 −2.22 0.027 −106.52 −6.51
Airborne PAH (−) Grilled meat (−) reference
Airborne PAH (−) Grilled meat (+) −164.57 −2.51 0.012 −293.31 −35.83
Airborne PAH(+) Grilled meat (−) −106.00 −2.92 0.004 −177.27 −34.65
Airborne PAH (+) Grilled meat (+) −214.30 −2.06 0.040 −419.01 −9.59

*dichotomized by median value of the distribution (24.9 ng/m3)

**/ 0 = no consumption of the barbecued meat, 1 = reported consumption of the barbecued meat in the last trimester of pregnancy

A similar statistical approach for other birth outcomes revealed that the association between length and head circumference at birth and the consumption of barbecued meat was of borderline significance level (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4.

Estimated effect of barbecued meat consumed over the third trimester of pregnancy on length at birth adjusted for airborne PAHs and other potential confounders (N = 432, R-squared = 0.27)

Predictors Coef. t P>t [95% Conf.
Interval]
Maternal age 0.04 0.93 0.354 −0.04 0.11
Maternal education (in years) 0.03 0.60 0.547 −0.06 0.12
Gestational age (weeks) 0.78 7.73 0.000 0.58 0.98
Maternal weight gain in pregnancy (kg) 0.12 5.06 0.000 0.07 0.16
Prepregnancy maternal weight (kg) 0.06 4.86 0.000 0.04 0.09
Child’s sex (girls) −1.19 −5.19 0.000 −1.64 −0.74
Parity 0.17 0.83 0.408 −0.23 0.57
Cord cotinine (lg) −0.31 −1.84 0.066 −0.64 0.02
Airborne PAH exposure* −0.67 −2.90 0.004 −1.12 −0.22
Consumption of barbecued meat ** −0.67 −1.82 0.070 −1.39 0.05
*

dichotomized by median value of the distribution (24.9 ng/m3)

**

/ 0 = no consumption of the barbecued meat, 1 = reported consumption of the barbecued meat in the last trimester of pregnancy

Table 5.

Estimated effect of barbecued meat consumed over the third trimester of pregnancy on head circumference adjusted for airborne PAHs and other potential confounders (N = 432, R-squared = 0.25)

Predictors Coef. t P>t [95% Conf. Interval]
Maternal age 0.01 0.24 0.814 −0.04 0.04
Maternal education (in years) 0.05 2.08 0.039 0.01 0.10
Gestational age (weeks) 0.25 4.79 0.000 0.15 0.36
Maternal weight gain in pregnancy (kg) 0.06 4.71 0.000 0.03 0.08
Prepregnancy maternal weight (kg) 0.04 5.35 0.000 0.02 0.05
Child’s sex (girls) −0.73 −6.12 0.000 −0.97 −0.50
Parity 0.32 3.01 0.003 0.11 0.53
Cord cotinine (lg) −0.14 −1.59 0.113 −0.31 0.03
Airborne PAH exposure* −0.32 −2.63 0.009 −0.55 −0.08
Consumption of barbecued meat ** −0.36 −1.87 0.062 −0.74 0.02
*

dichotomized by median value of the distribution (24.9 ng/m3)

**

/ 0 = no consumption of the barbecued meat, 1 = reported consumption of the barbecued meat in the last trimester of pregnancy

In a separate analysis, we tested the effect of the consumption of barbecued meat in the last trimester of pregnancy on gestational age. There was no evidence that the intake of barbecued meat shortens the duration of pregnancy (results not shown here); thus the observed deficit in birthweight and other birth outcomes could not have been mediated by shortening the gestation period.

Discussion

The results of our study suggest that both sources of PAH prenatal exposure (airborne and dietary) have an additive effect on birthweight deficit in newborns. While the higher prenatal airborne PAH exposure (above median value) adjusted for a wide set of confounders amounted to birthweight deficit of 106 g, the effect of ingested barbecued meat consumed in the last pregnancy trimester resulted in birthweight deficit of 165 g. The estimated combined exposure to both sources of PAHs produced the birthweight deficit of 214 g. Out of the total variability in birthweight (39%) explained by the multivariable linear regression model, 1.3% could be attributed to prenatal airborne PAHs exposure and only 0.8% to the consumption of charcoal grilled meat. Higher proportion of variability explained by airborne PAH was brought about by higher prevalence of airborne PAH exposure (50%) compared with that of the grilled meat (11%). Since there was no significant interaction term between the exposure to airborne PAH and barbecued meat, the combined health effects should reflect summarized exposure to both PAH sources and not their synergistic effect. The reduction in birthweight attributed to the airborne PAHs or to the consumption of barbecued meat could not be mediated by shortening of gestation age, since duration of pregnancy was not associated with the exposures in question.

In earlier publications the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-DNA adducts in peripheral white cells after consumption of charcoal broiled beef was reported by Rothman et al. (29, 30). In the latter study the adducts levels were positively associated with the recent consumption of charcoal broiled food (median duration since the last consumption was 6 days with range 1-30 days). Individuals who consumed barbecued food more than twice in the previous two weeks had a 4-fold increased risk of having elevated adducts level (>0.2 fmole/μg DNA) compared to individuals consuming this kind of food two or fewer times. However, the results of the analysis were not adjusted for airborne PAH exposure.

Our study did not show the association between consumption of barbecued meat in pregnancy and cord blood PAH-DNA adducts. However, DNA adduct formation is subject to a greater variability than external exposure. As this variability results from differences in metabolic phenotypes related to genetic polymorphisms in a variety of enzymes involved in the activation or detoxification of PAH or repair of PAH-DNA adducts, individuals with a similar level of external exposure, might have different PAH-DNA adduct levels (15). Moreover, the recent study by Kelvin et al (31) showed that plasma antioxidants may also modulate the effect of prenatal PAH exposure on PAH-DNA adducts in cord blood.

Our study showing the negative impact of airborne PAH exposure on birth outcomes corresponds with earlier findings of Perera et al. (32 - 34) and with the results of the analysis published by Choi et al (21). Choi et al. demonstrated in two separate but parallel prospective cohort studies that prenatal exposure to airborne PAHs was significantly associated with adverse effects of fetal growth in both Polish and US African Americans.

Potential strength of our study comes from the fact that personal monitoring of exposure to airborne PAHs in pregnancy was performed in each study subjects. In our study, the most important confounders of the birth outcomes, such as the presence of chronic diseases or active tobacco smoking by mothers in pregnancy have been removed through entry criteria. Other risk factors that might potentially have effect on giving birth to newborns with lower growth, such as maternal prepregnancy weight, weight gain in gestation, gestation age, parity, child’s sex and prenatal ETS were also accounted for in the analysis.

Main weak points of our study result from the relatively small number of individuals who consumed barbecued food in pregnancy, the lack of more precise information on timing of the ingestion of barbecued meat in the last pregnancy trimester, and estimates of PAH dietary exposure based only on the food frequency questionnaires, which are prone to recall bias. Moreover, the consumption of barbecued meat might be a proxy indicator of some life style factors such as particular maternal nutrition patterns, inadequate provision of polyunsaturated fatty acids (35) folic acid or iron in maternal diet (36), and other potential co-exposures which were not controlled in the present study. Nevertheless, supplementary analysis of the data regarding alcohol intake in pregnancy did not show correlation with any of the main PAH exposure variables.

In conclusion, this study highlights the fact that not only contaminated air might be linked to detrimental birth outcome effects but possibly the exposure to PAH compounds resulting from the consumption of grilled food in pregnancy, unrecognized to date as a reproductive health hazard. The results of the study may have practical implications for public health policy and establishing guidelines for the protection of newborns’ health, however, more studies exploring the impact of dietary sources of PAH exposure in pregnancy on newborns’ health are needed.

Acknowledgements

This study is part of an ongoing comparative longitudinal investigation on the health impact of prenatal exposure to outdoor/indoor air pollution in infants and children being conducted in New York City and Krakow. The study received funding from an RO1 grant entitled, “Vulnerability of the Fetus/Infant to PAH, PM2.5 and ETS” (NIEHS 1R01ES010165-01; 02/01/00-01/31/06), the Gladys T. and Roland Harriman Foundation, and the Lundin Foundation. Principal investigator: Prof. FP Perera, co-investigator: Prof WA Jedrychowski.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks in humans . Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. Vol. 92. Lyon, France: 2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scientific Committee on Foods of EC (SCF) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food in the risk to human health of PAHs in food. Brussels: SCF: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Phillips DH. PAHs in the diet. Mutat Res. 1999;443:139–147. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Falco G, Domingo JL, LLobet JM, et al. PAHs in Foods: Human Exposure through the Diet in Catalonia, Spain. J Food Protect. 2003;66:2325–2331. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.12.2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guillen MD, Sopelana P, Partearroyo MA. Food as a source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Rev Environ Health. 1997;12:133–146. doi: 10.1515/reveh.1997.12.3.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mottier P, Parisod V, Turesky RJ. Quantitative determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in barbecued meat sausages by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. J Agr Food Chem. 2000;48:1160–1166. doi: 10.1021/jf991205y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Food Standard Agency of UK (FSA) PAHs in the UK Diet: Total Diet Study Samples. 2000. Food Survey Information Sheet. No.31/02. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen BH, Lin YS. Formation of PAHs during processing of duck meat. J Agr Food Chem. 1997;45:1394–1403. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Knize MG, Salmon CP, Pais P, et al. Food heating and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amine and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mutagens/carcinogens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1999;459:179–193. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4853-9_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dyremark A, Westerholm R, Övervik E, et al. PAH emissions from charcoal grilling. Atmosph Environ. 1995;13:1553–1558. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lambert TW, Lane S. Lead, arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and house dust in the communities surrounding the Sydney, Nova Scotia, tar ponds. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:35–41. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.WHO . Addendum to Vol. 2 Health criteria and other supporting information. 2nd ed WHO; Geneva: 1998. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manchester DK, Perera FP. Relationship between ambient air pollution and DNA damage in Polish mothers and newborns. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(Suppl.3):821–826. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai W, et al. Effects of Transplacental Exposure to Environmental Pollutants on Birth Outcomes in a Multiethnic Population. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:201–205. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Godschalk RWL, Van Schooten FJ, Bartsch H. A critical evaluation of DNA adducts as biological markers for human exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds. J Biochem Molecular Biol. 2003;36:1–11. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2003.36.1.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schocket B. DNA damage in humans exposed to environmental and dietary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mutat Res. 1999;8:143–153. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Whyatt RM, Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, et al. Association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adduct levels in maternal and newborn white blood cells and glutathione S-transferase P1 and CYP1A1 polymorphisms. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. 2000;9:207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Hemminki K, et al. Biomarkers of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA damage and cigarette smoke exposures in paired maternal and newborn blood samples as a measure of differential susceptibility. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2001;10:581–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Perera FP, Tang D, Whyatt RM, et al. DNA damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons measured by benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in mothers and newborns from Northern Manhattan, the World Trade Center Area, Poland, and China. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2005;14:709–714. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Perera FP, Tang D, Rauh V, et al. Relationships among polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, proximity to the World Trade Center, and effects on fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1062–1067. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J, et al. International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1744–1750. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8982. 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Perera F, Li Z, Whyatt R, et al. Prenatal Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure and Child Intelligence at Age 5. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e195–e202. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jedrychowski W, Whyatt RM, Camman DE, et al. Effect of prenatal PAH exposure on birth outcomes and neurocognitive development in a cohort of newborns in Poland. Study design and preliminary ambient data. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2003;16:21–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kinney PL, Chillrud SN, Samstrom S, et al. Exposures to multiple air toxics in New York City. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:539–546. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.US Environmental Protection Agency . Compendium method to-13a in compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air. second edition Office of Research and Development. National Risk Management Research Laboratory. Center for Environmental Research Information; Cincinnati: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alexandrov K, Rojas M, Geneste O, et al. An improved fluorimetric assay for dosimetry of benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide–DNA adducts in smokers’ lung: comparisons with total bulky adducts and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity. Cancer Res. 1992;51:6248–6253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bernert JT, Turner WE, Pirkle JL, et al. Development and validation of sensitive method for determination of serum cotinine in smokers and nonsmokers by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass-spectrometry. Clin Chem. 1997;43:2281–2291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend, et al. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:435–438. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.11.1435. 1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rothman N, Poirier MC, Baser ME, et al. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-DNA adducts in peripheral white blood cells during consumption of charcoal broiled beef. Carcinogenesis. 1990;11:1241–1243. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.7.1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rothman N, Poirier MC, Haas RA, et al. Association of PAH-adducts in peripheral white blood cells with dietary exposure to polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;99:265–267. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9399265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kelvin EA, Edwards S, Jedrychowski W, et al. Modulation of prenatal PAH Exposure on PAH-DNA adducts in cord blond by plasma antioxidants. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2009;18:2262–2268. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski, et al. Recent developments in molecular epidemiology: a study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998;147:309–314. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, et al. Molecular epidemiologic research on the effects of environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(Suppl.3):451–460. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s3451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, et al. Molecular evidence of an interaction between prenatal environmental exposures and birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:626–630. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Santillan ME, Vincenti LM, Martini AC, et al. Developmental and neurobehavioral effects of perinatal exposure to diets with different omega-6:omega-3 ratios in mice. Nutrition. 2010;26:423–31. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Banhidy F, Acs N, Puho EH, et al. Iron deficiency anemia: pregnancy outcomes with or without iron supplementation. Nutrition. 2011;27:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES