Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Apr 25;25(8):1212–1221. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.629256

The Frequency and Clinical Significance of Intra-amniotic Inflammation in Women With Preterm Uterine Contractility but Without Cervical Change: Do the Diagnostic Criteria for Preterm Labor Need to be Changed?

Sun Min KIM 1, Roberto ROMERO 2, JoonHo LEE 1, Seung Mi LEE 1, Chan-Wook PARK 1, Joong Shin PARK 1, Bo Hyun YOON 1
PMCID: PMC3288712  NIHMSID: NIHMS334350  PMID: 21999173

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm increased uterine contractility with intact membranes but without cervical change.

METHODS

Amniocentesis was performed in 132 patients with regular uterine contractions and intact membranes without cervical change. Amniotic fluid was cultured for bacteria and mycoplasmas and assayed for matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8). Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid MMP-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL).

RESULTS

1) Intra-amniotic inflammation was present in 12.1% (16/132); 2) Culture-proven intra-amniotic infection was diagnosed in 3% (4/132) of patients without demonstrable cervical change on admission or during the period of observation; and 3) Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery and adverse outcomes, and shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery intervals than those without intra-amniotic inflammation (P < .05 for each). Adverse outcomes included chorioamnionitis, funisitis, and neonatal death.

CONCLUSION

Intra-amniotic inflammation was present in 12% of patients with regular uterine contractions without cervical change, while culture-proven intra-amniotic infection was present in 3%. The presence of intra-amniotic inflammation was a significant risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes. These observations question whether cervical changes should be required for the diagnosis of preterm labor, because patients without modifications in cervical status on admission or during a period of observation are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: prematurity, preterm parturition, preterm birth, prognosis, preterm delivery, micro-organisms, matrix metalloproteinase, MMP8, funisitis, histologic chorioamnionitis

Introduction

The diagnosis of labor (both term and preterm) is a major challenge in obstetrics [1-6]. The standard view is that a certain diagnosis of labor can only be made retrospectively once increased uterine contractility leads to progressive cervical dilatation and impending or actual delivery [2].

The differential diagnosis between “true” spontaneous labor at term and “false labor” continues to be a dilemma. Virtually every labor and delivery unit has had the experience of having discharged a patient with the diagnosis of false labor and then learning that the patient delivered on her way back to the hospital. In most instances, this does not represent a problem because term neonates are mature and experience few complications.

On the other hand, a “false negative” diagnosis of preterm labor can have more serious implications [7-10]. Patients often present to the hospital with increased uterine contractility, and obstetricians are expected to identify those who have Braxton-Hicks contractions from those who are in “true” preterm labor. However, there is no “gold standard” to diagnose “true” preterm labor. Some physicians have introduced the term “threatened preterm labor” to describe the clinical condition in which a patient has increased uterine contractility with or without cervical changes.

The standard criteria for the diagnosis of preterm labor recommended by professional organizations and investigators have changed over time. Decades ago, preterm labor was suspected purely on the basis of increased uterine contractility; however, when the concept of tocolysis was introduced into obstetrics, the use of pharmacologic agents (e.g. intravenous alcohol or non-specific adrenergic agents) administered to achieve uterine relaxation was associated with serious adverse events which could be lethal to the mother [11-13]. Thus, the need emerged to identify patients who were at greater risk for preterm delivery in whom tocolysis “should” be used. This is how a change in cervical status (e.g. progressive cervical change or cervical changes at the time of diagnosis) became part of the standard criteria to diagnose preterm labor [14,15]. Patients with such diagnosis would be eligible for the administration of tocolysis and steroids, while those without cervical change are monitored and often discharged. Yet, these patients are at increased risk for preterm delivery [16-23].

To address the question of whether patients with an increase in uterine contractility but without cervical change could have serious pathologic processes, we investigated the frequency of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and its clinical significance. The basis for this is that intra-amniotic infection/inflammation is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome and neonatal morbidity [24-75].

Materials and Methods

Study population

The study population consisted of consecutive patients who were admitted to Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, with regular uterine contractions and intact membranes without cervical change before 35 weeks of gestation. The patients met the following criteria: (1) singleton gestation; (2) regular uterine contractions - eight or more in 60 minutes; (3) initial cervical dilatation ≤ 1 cm and effacement ≤ 75% by digital cervical examination and no cervical change for at least 3 hours; and (4) transabdominal amniocentesis for microbiologic studies or assessment of fetal lung maturity. Patients with placenta previa or those who had previously undergone a cervical cerclage were excluded.

The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, has approved the collection and utilization of the biological materials and clinical data for research purposes.

Amniotic fluid

Amniotic fluid was obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis with ultrasound guide and aseptic technique with written informed consent. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, as well as for genital mycoplasmas (ureaplasmas [Ureaplasma urealyticum & Ureaplasma parvum] and Mycoplasma hominis), and used for assessment of fetal lung maturity. The remaining amniotic fluid was centrifuged, and the supernatant was stored at −70°C until assayed.

Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) concentration (>23 ng/mL), as previously reported [76]. Previous studies indicated that amniotic fluid MMP-8 is a sensitive and specific index of intra-amniotic inflammation and correlates with an amniotic fluid white blood cell (WBC) count [77,78]. MMP-8 concentration in the stored amniotic fluid was measured with a commercially available, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) with a sensitivity of 0.3 ng/mL. Both inter- and intra- assay coefficients of variation were < 10%.

Acute histologic chorioamnionitis, funisitis and neonatal morbidity

Clinical chorioamnionitis was diagnosed according to definitions previously described in detail [79]. Acute histologic chorioamnionitis was diagnosed when inflammatory change was detected in any part of the placental tissue samples (amnion, chorion-decidua and chorionic plate); funisitis was diagnosed in the presence of neutrophil infiltration into the umbilical vessel walls or into Wharton’s jelly, according to the criteria previously reported [80]. Significant neonatal morbidity was defined when any of the following conditions was diagnosed: proven congenital neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, congenital pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade ≥II), and necrotizing enterocolitis. The diagnostic criteria of each condition were described in detail in previous reports from our group [81].

Statistical analysis

Comparison of the continuous variables was performed by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Proportions were compared with the Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact tests. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation and adverse perinatal outcomes of interest to adjust for potential confounding factors. Survival analysis was used to compare the amniocentesis-to-delivery interval according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation. Patients delivered for maternal or fetal indications were treated as censored observations, with a censoring time equal to the amniocentesis-to-delivery interval. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to control covariates and to investigate the hazards ratio. A probability value of < .05 was considered to be of statistical significance.

Results

The frequency of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation

Intra-amniotic inflammation was present in 12.1% (16/132) of the patients with regular uterine contractions without cervical change, and microorganisms were detected in 3.1% of these cases (4/130). Microorganisms isolated from amniotic fluid were Ureaplasma urealyticum (n=2), Mycoplasma hominis and Streptococcus anginosus (n=1; one patient had 2 organisms), and Acinetobacter Bauman (n=1). All patients with a positive amniotic fluid culture had intra-amniotic inflammation. On the other hand, 13 patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had negative amniotic fluid cultures.

Characteristics of study population

Table I shows the clinical characteristics of the study population according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation. Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had a significantly lower median gestational age at amniocentesis than those without inflammation (P < .05). There were no significant differences in maternal age, parity, interval from admission to amniocentesis, frequency of uterine contractility and the rate of administration of tocolysis between patients with and without intra-amniotic inflammation (P > .1, Table I).

Table I.

Clinical characteristics according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation

Intra-amniotic inflammation
P value
Negativea
(n=116)
Positiveb
(n=16)
Maternal age (y)c 30.0 (23-42) 29.5 (25-43) NS
Nulliparity (n) 68 (58.6%) 11 (68.8%) NS
Gestational age at amniocentesis (wk) c 31.6 (19.0-34.9) 28.5 (20.9-34.6) < .05
Interval to amniocentesis from admission
(hr) c
8.0 (3.0-336.0) 8.0 (3.0-272.0) NS
No. of uterine contraction (/hr) d 17.7 ± 8.7 15.4 ± 5.1 NS
Tocolysis at amniocentesis (n) 74 (63.8%) 12 (75.0%) NS

AF, amniotic fluid; MMP-8, matrix metalloproteinase-8; NS, not significant.

a

Negative, AF MMP-8 < 23 ng/mL

b

Positive, AF MMP-8 > 23 ng/mL

c

Values are given as median (range)

d

Data given as mean ± SD

Amniocentesis-to-delivery interval

Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had significantly shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery intervals than those without intra-amniotic inflammation as demonstrated by survival analysis (P = .001; Figure 1), and intra-amniotic inflammation was significantly associated with a short interval to delivery after the adjustment for gestational age (hazards ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.7-12.5; P < .05, Cox proportional hazards model analysis).

Figure 1. Survival analysis of amniocentesis-to-delivery interval.

Figure 1

Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had a significantly shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval than those without inflammation (median, 4.0 days [range, 0.5-109.3 days] vs. median, 45.9 days [range, 0.0-144.9 days]; log rank, P= .001).

Pregnancy outcome

Table II demonstrates pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the study population according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation. Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had significantly lower median gestational ages at birth and birthweights, and higher rates of preterm delivery, histologic chorioamnionitis, funisitis, neonatal death, and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit than those without intra-amniotic inflammation (P < .05 for each, Table II).

Table II.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcome according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation

Intra-amniotic inflammation P value

Negativea
(n=116)
Positiveb
(n=16)
Unadjusted Adjusted c
Gestational age at delivery (wk)d 38.4 (21.4-42.6) 32.7 (21.4-38.3) <.001
Amniocentesis-to-delivery interval (n)
            ≤48 hr 7 (6.0%) 5 (31.3%) < .01 < .01
            ≤7 d 15 (12.9%) 12 (75.0%) < .001 < .001
Preterm delivery (n) 38 (32.8%) 14 (87.5%) <.001 < .001
Clinical chorioamnionitis (n) 0 (0.0%) 3 (18.8%) < .01
Histologic chorioamnionitis (n/N)e,f 15/66 (22.7%) 7/10 (70.0%) < .01 < .01
Funisitis (n/N)e,f 2/66 (3.0%) 5/10 (50.0%) < .001 < .001
Birthweight (g)d 2930 (390-4200) 1865 (550-2810) < .001
1-minute Apgar score <4 (n/N) f 7/92 (7.6%) 4/14 (28.6%) < .05 .054
5-minute Apgar score <7 (n/N) f 5/92 (5.4%) 4/14 (28.6%) < .05 < .05
Neonatal deaths (n/N) g 2/112 (1.8%) 4/16 (25.0%) < .01 < .01
     Shortly after birth,<1 day 1 4
    Perinatal period,<1 month 1 0
Admission to NICU (n/N)f,h 18/92 (19.6%) 7/11 (63.6%) < .01 < .01
Significant neonatal morbidity (n/N)f,h 9/92 (9.8%) 3/11 (27.3%) NS NS
Neonatal mortality and significant
morbidity (n/N)
10/93 (10.8%) 7/15 (46.7%) < .01 < .01

AF, amniotic fluid; MMP-8, matrix metalloproteinase-8; NS, not significant; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.

a

Negative, AF MMP-8 < 23 ng/mL.

b

Positive, AF MMP-8 > 23 ng/mL.

c

Adjusted for gestational age at amniocentesis (logistic regression analysis).

d

Values are given as median (range).

e

Cases without placental examination were excluded.

f

Cases delivered at other hospitals were excluded, most of them were delivered at term without complication.

g

Cases with major anomaly were excluded.

h

Cases with major anomaly or died in the delivery room were excluded. Significant neonatal morbidity was defined as the presence of any following conditions: proven neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade ≥ II), and necrotizing enterocolitis. Five newborns who died within 1 day with or without resuscitation due to extreme prematurity were excluded because they could not be evaluated for morbidity.

Subgroup analysis according to the duration of observation of cervical change

The current study included patients with regular uterine contractions and no cervical change for at least 3 hours. We also included patients with no cervical change for at least 6 hours. In such patients, the rate of intra-amniotic inflammation was 13.6% (11/81). Table III compares the outcome between patients with and without intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with regular uterine contractions and no cervical change for 6 hours or more. Patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes than those without inflammation (P < .05 for each). Patients with intra-amniotic infection had significantly lower gestational ages at birth and birthweights. They also had shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery intervals and higher rates of preterm delivery, histologic chorioamnionitis, funisitis, neonatal death and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Table III.

Outcomes in patients with regular uterine contractions and no cervical change for at least 6 hours

Intra-amniotic inflammation P value

Negativea
(n=70)
Positiveb
(n=11)
Unadjusted Adjusted c
Gestational age at delivery (wk)d 38.4 (21.4-41.6) 32.1 (21.4-38.3) < .001
Amniocentesis-to-delivery interval (n)
            ≤48 hr 4 (5.7%) 4 (36.4%) < .05 < .05
            ≤7 d 9 (12.9%) 8 (72.7%) < .001 < .001
Preterm delivery (n) 20 (28.6%) 10 (90.9%) < .001 < .05
Histologic chorioamnionitis (n/N)e,f 7/38 (18.4%) 4/5 (80.0%) < .05 < .05
Funisitis (n/N)e,f 0 2/5 (40.0%) < .05
Birthweight (g)d 2970 (390-4200) 1680 (550-2810) < .001
1-minute Apgar score <4 (n/N) f 5/55 (9.1%) 4/9 (44.4%) < .05 < .05
5-minute Apgar score <7 (n/N) f 2/55 (3.6%) 4/9 (44.4%) < .01 < .01
Neonatal deaths (n/N) g 1/68 (1.5%) 4/11 (36.4%) < .01 < .05
Admission to NICU (n/N)f,h 9/55 (16.4%) 4/6 (66.7%) < .05 < .05
Significant neonatal morbidity (n/N)f,h 6/55 (10.9%) 2/6 (33.3%) NS NS
Neonatal mortality and significant
morbidity (n/N)
7/56 (12.5%) 6/10 (60.0%) < .01 < .05

AF, amniotic fluid; MMP-8, matrix metalloproteinase-8; NS, not significant; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.

a

Negative, AF MMP-8 < 23 ng/mL.

b

Positive, AF MMP-8 > 23 ng/mL.

c

Adjusted for gestational age at amniocentesis (logistic regression analysis).

d

Values are given as median (range).

e

Cases without placental examination were excluded.

f

Cases delivered at other hospitals were excluded, most of them were delivered at term without complication.

g

Cases with major anomaly were excluded.

h

Cases with major anomaly or died in the delivery room were excluded. Significant neonatal morbidity was defined as the presence of any following conditions: proven neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade ≥ II), and necrotizing enterocolitis. Five newborns who died within 1 day with or without resuscitation due to extreme prematurity were excluded because they could not be evaluate about morbidity.

We also analyzed our data to focus on patients who did not have cervical change for at least 12 hours. Intra-amniotic inflammation was found in 12.5% (6/48). Similarly, patients with intra-amniotic inflammation had significantly lower median gestational ages at birth, lower median birthweights, shorter median intervals to delivery, and higher rates of preterm delivery, histologic chorioamnionitis, funisitis, and neonatal death than those without inflammation in patients with regular uterine contractions and no cervical change for at least 12 hours (P < .05 for each).

Comment

Principal findings of the study

1) Patients with increased preterm uterine contractility and intact membranes but without cervical change have a prevalence of intra-amniotic inflammation of 12% and culture-proven intra-amniotic infection of 3%. The organisms found in the amniotic cavity are similar to those involved in intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes [82-87] or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes [88-94]; 2) patients with intra-amniotic inflammation were at risk for preterm delivery and adverse neonatal outcome as well as histologic chorioamnionitis and funisitis; 3) these data indicate that a fraction of patients who do not meet the clinical definition of preterm labor as currently recommended by textbooks and professional organizations are still at risk for preterm delivery, intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, and adverse pregnancy outcome; and 4) preterm labor and delivery can occur in patients without cervical change at presentation or within a 12-hour period of observation.

Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes and without cervical change

This is the first and only study which focused exclusively on this population and, therefore, our findings cannot be compared with other reports. However, the presence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity with bacteria has been demonstrated in patients at term not in labor [95,96], undergoing mid-trimester amniocentesis [97-99], those with an asymptomatic short cervix [100-104] and those with idiopathic vaginal bleeding [105]. Patients in the latter two categories have an excess of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation over those who are at term not in labor or who undergo mid-trimester amniocentesis for genetic indications. Such observations suggest that subclinical intra-amniotic infection/inflammation may lead to either a short cervix or vaginal bleeding.

Table IV displays the prevalence of microbial invasion observed in different obstetrical syndromes [86,101,106-192]. It is noteworthy that, among patients with preterm labor and intact membranes, the mean frequency of microbial invasion at the time of admission is approximately 12%. This is four-fold higher than that observed in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes in the current study, and our observations confirm previous findings that the more advanced the cervical dilatation or the shorter the cervix in ultrasound examinations, the higher the frequency of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation [101,193-197].

Table IV.

Prevalence of microbial invasion reported for the different obstetrical syndromes

Obstetrical syndromes Microbial invasion in
amniotic fluid
Term not in labor [86,87] 1%
Term in labor [86,87,125] 4%-19%
Premature rupture of membranes at term [119] 34%
Premature rupture of membranes at preterm
[30,42,58,61,71,75,82,84,96,100,101,103,105,106,117,121,122,126,128,130
,131,134,135,143,145,146,150,151,158]
15%-58%
Preterm labor with intact membranes [22-25,28,32,40,75,78-80,97-
99,102,104,107-118,121,123,124,127,129,132-134,136-
142,144,147,149,159,160]
0%-48%
Cervical insufficiency [72,120,152] 8%-52%
Short cervix [91,94,148] 4%-9%
Small for gestational age [156] 0%
Preeclampsia [155] 2%
Vaginal bleeding [95,153,157] 5%-14%

We have previously demonstrated a similar prognosis for patients with intra-amniotic inflammation and a negative amniotic fluid culture and for those with culture-proven intra-amniotic infection [198-200]. Therefore, the finding reported herein that 12% of patients with increased preterm uterine contractility have intra-amniotic inflammation and adverse outcome is of importance because this is the most common presentation of patients suspected to have preterm labor.

The cause of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with negative amniotic fluid cultures can be bacterial infection that escaped detection with cultivation techniques [201,202] or viral infection [203-205]. We have previously demonstrated that molecular microbiologic techniques are able to identify microbial footprints in patients with intra-amniotic inflammation but negative amniotic fluid cultures [86,206-209]. It is possible that, if such techniques were used, the rate of intra-amniotic infection would be higher. The same applies for techniques to isolate the presence of viruses.

The common pathway of parturition

We have proposed that the common pathway of parturition [210,211] involves: 1) increased uterine contractility; 2) cervical ripening; and 3) membrane/decidual activation. These components can be activated in a synchronous manner and then the patient with overt activation of the three components will present with increased uterine contractility, cervical dilatation, and membrane rupture. Subclinical degrees of activation can occur which can only be detected with surface electromyography [212-214], cervical ultrasound [101,215-217], coloscope, or the presence of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin in cervico-vaginal fluid, for membrane decidual activation [218-223].

Asynchronous activation of the common pathway can also occur. Hence, the patient can present with isolated increased uterine contractility, isolated cervical insufficiency, [224,225] or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes [226,227]. Patients with less overt signs of asynchronous activation of the common pathway are also observed. Typically, such patients were the subjects of the present study. However, the greater the number of components of the common pathway that are activated, the more likely the patient will have preterm labor that will lead to preterm delivery.

Requirement of cervical change for the diagnosis of preterm labor

The requirement for some degree of change in cervical status for the diagnosis of preterm labor was introduced in clinical practice to minimize the number of patients who would be treated with tocolytic agents [228,229]. The primary rationale behind the requirement of changes in cervical status for the diagnosis of preterm labor was the avoidance of overtreatment and prevention of adverse events. It was reasoned that if the patient with isolated preterm uterine contractions would continue to have contractions and the cervix changed, this would be diagnostic of preterm labor and that such patient would still be in time for treatment to arrest uterine contractility with tocolysis and for the prevention of preterm delivery.

Many patients admitted to a labor and delivery unit with the suspicion of preterm labor are given intravenous hydration. Pircon et al. [230] reported the outcome of 48 patients with preterm uterine contractions but without cervical change randomized to bed rest (n=28) or bed rest and hydration (n=20). Twenty-two patients stopped contracting; however, 18% (4/22) subsequently delivered preterm neonates. Therefore, whatever the apparent short-term clinical response to hydration might be, patients remain at risk for preterm delivery. This has also been the case when patients have been randomized to receive a single injection of subcutaneous terbutaline. Even though contractions are likely to abate, pregnancy outcome is no different in patients who receive terbutaline than in the control group [231,232]. Collectively, these studies highlight the clinical difficulties of the diagnosis of preterm labor and that attempts to implement interventions in the hope that they would assist in the differential diagnosis between true and false preterm labor have not been successful.

Clinical implications of this study

Our observations suggest that patients presenting with an episode of increased preterm uterine contractility without cervical changes cannot be considered to have false preterm labor and to be risk-free. Although many clinicians discharge such patients from the labor and delivery unit, not only do they remain at risk for preterm delivery, but a fraction has intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and the increased frequency of uterine contractions may be the only sign of that pathologic process. For these reasons, we propose that the diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation be undertaken, and that management be changed if that is the case (administration of antibiotics and steroids, and suspension of tocolysis if initiated) [101,233-235]. Patients can be counseled that those with intra-amniotic inflammation will deliver a preterm neonate in 87.5% of cases (see Table II). The absence of intra-amniotic inflammation reduces the risk of preterm delivery (32.8%; see Table II), and the pathologic mechanisms responsible for this have not been elucidated but may be related to chronic chorioamnionitis, which is evidence of maternal anti-fetal rejection [236,237].

Cervical change during the period of observation

Textbooks and investigators recommend that the diagnosis of preterm labor be made if cervical changes are present at admission, and if such changes are documented during a period of observation. However, the precise duration of the period of observation and the miminum change required to make a diagnosis are rarely specified – even when they are, the scientific basis for this is unclear. It is noteworthy that, in the current study, the frequency of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was no different if the patients presented without cervical change on admission, or if the cervix did not change after 12 hours.

Why would some patients with increased preterm uterine contractility but without cervical change have intra-amniotic infection/inflammation?

One possibility is that patients have an intra-amniotic infection of hematogenous origin. Indeed, we and others have found bacteria in amniotic fluid which are normally found in the oral cavity using molecular techniques [238,239]. This suggests that some patients may have a bacteremia, and the transplacental passage of the bacteria causes intra-amniotic infection. Another possibility is that the uterine cavity (decidua) is not sterile during pregnancy, and bacteria are present in biofilms which do not elicit a robust proinflammatory host response. However, fracture of the biofilm may result in the release of planktonic bacteria, which would be capable of multiplication, passage across the membranes, and the induction of inflammation. We have previously reported that patients who have bacteria in the chorioamniotic space have a higher mean amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration than those without bacteria in the chorioamniotic space [240]. IL-6 is a reliable marker of intra-amniotic inflammation.

A possibility that should not be overlooked is that if the mucus plug is lost or defective [241-244], microorganisms from the lower genital tract may ascend into the uterus during uterine contractions. Indeed, a recent study indicated that vaginal fluid can ascend into the uterine cavity by a suction-like effect caused by uterine contractions (demonstrated byhystero-salpingo scintigraphy with contrast media) [245]. Therefore, it is possible that uterine contractions in the appropriate host (one in which the innate immune system is compromised because of a defective mucus plug or the loss of the mucus plug in patients with a short cervix) may predispose to ascending intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.

It is noteworthy that 19% of patients with spontaneous labor at term with intact membranes have a positive amniotic fluid culture [246]. These observations have been confirmed by studying the microbial state of the amniotic cavity in patients in spontaneous labor at term undergoing cesarean section [247].

CONCLUSION

This study shows that subclinical intra-amniotic infection/inflammation is present in a fraction of patients with an episode of preterm labor with intact membranes and without cervical change. Thus, preterm uterine contractions may be the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic inflammation. However, an important implication of our observation is that preterm labor leading to preterm delivery can present itself as increased preterm uterine contractility without cervical change. This observation calls for a re-examination of the diagnostic criteria for preterm labor.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported (in part) by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS.

Footnotes

This study was presented at the 31st Annual Clinical Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, San Francisco, CA, Feb. 7-12, 2011.

Declaration of interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Gonik B, Creasy RK. Preterm labor: its diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154:3–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90383-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lauzon L, Hodnett E. Labour assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000936. CD000936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abrahams C, Katz M. A perspective on the diagnosis of preterm labor. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2002;16:1–11. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200206000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:402–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Janssen PA, Iker CE, Carty EA. Early labour assessment and support at home: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:734–41. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McPheeters ML, Miller WC, Hartmann KE, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Garrett JM, Thorp JM. The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1325–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, DuBard MB, Corliss DK, Andrews JB. Warning symptoms, uterine contractions, and cervical examination findings in women at risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:748–54. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91000-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lockwood CJ, Dudenhausen JW. New approaches to the prediction of preterm delivery. J Perinat Med. 1993;21:441–52. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1993.21.6.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abrahams C, Katz M. A perspective on the diagnosis of preterm labor. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2002;16:1–11. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200206000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:402–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Landesman R, Wilson K. The relaxant effect of adrenergic compounds on isolated gravid human myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;100:969–73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33757-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fuchs F, Raiha NC, Seppala M. Ethanol administration in premature labour. Lancet. 1971;2:312–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91354-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benedetti TJ. Maternal complications of parenteral beta-sympathomimetic therapy for premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90331-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hueston WJ. Preterm contractions in community settings: II. Predicting preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:43–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macones GA, Segel SY, Stamilio DM, Morgan MA. Predicting delivery within 48 hours in women treated with parenteral tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:432–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pircon RA, Strassner HT, Kirz DS, Towers CV. Controlled trial of hydration and bed rest versus bed rest alone in the evaluation of preterm uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:775–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90400-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brustman LE, Langer O, Damus K, Anyaegbunam A, Merkatz IR. Uterine contractility patterns after an episode of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:346–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Blondel B, Breart G, Llado J, Chartier M. Evaluation of the home-visiting system for women with threatened preterm labor: results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990;34:47–58. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90006-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Owen J, Brumfield C, Hauth JC. Management options in women with preterm uterine contractions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:814–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peaceman AM, Andrews WW, Thorp JM, Cliver SP, Lukes A, Iams JD, Coultrip L, Eriksen N, Holbrook RH, Elliott J, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:13–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70431-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Isler CM, Barrilleaux PS, Bufkin L, Morrison JC. Pregnancy outcome in women with preterm labor symptoms without cervical change. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1004–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.112105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.How HY, Khoury JC, Sibai BM. Cervical dilatation on presentation for preterm labor and subsequent preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:1–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bastek JA, Sammel MD, Rebele EC, Srinivas SK, Elovitz MA. The effects of a preterm labor episode prior to 34 weeks are evident in late preterm outcomes, despite the administration of betamethasone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:140–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wahbeh CJ, Hill GB, Eden RD, Gall SA. Intra-amniotic bacterial colonization in premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:739–43. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90558-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Romero R, Mazor M, Wu YK, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Mitchell MD, Hobbins JC. Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12:262–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:817–24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Romero R, Avila C, Santhanam U, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin 6 in preterm labor. Association with infection. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1392–400. doi: 10.1172/JCI114583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McDuffie RS, Jr., Sherman MP, Gibbs RS. Amniotic fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 in a rabbit model of bacterially induced preterm pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1583–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91745-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Romero R, Yoon BH, Kenney JS, Gomez R, Allison AC, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 determinations are of diagnostic and prognostic value in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1993;30:167–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1993.tb00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hillier SL, Witkin SS, Krohn MA, Watts DH, Kiviat NB, Eschenbach DA. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:941–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Diamond MP, Kenney JS, Ramirez M, Fidel PL, Sorokin Y, Cotton D, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin-6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:805–16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Gonzalez R, Diamond MP, Baumann P, Araneda H, Kenney JS, Cotton DB, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white blood cell count, interleukin-6, and gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:839–51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90014-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Horowitz S, Mazor M, Horowitz J, Porath A, Glezerman M. Antibodies to Ureaplasma urealyticum in women with intraamniotic infection and adverse pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:132–6. doi: 10.3109/00016349509008922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rizzo G, Capponi A, Rinaldo D, Tedeschi D, Arduini D, Romanini C. Interleukin-6 concentrations in cervical secretions identify microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:812–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dammann O, Leviton A. Maternal intrauterine infection, cytokines, and brain damage in the preterm newborn. Pediatr Res. 1997;42:1–8. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199707000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoon BH, Romero R, Jun JK, Park KH, Park JD, Ghezzi F, Kim BI. Amniotic fluid cytokines (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-8) and the risk for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:825–30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70276-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Markenson GR, Martin RK, Tillotson-Criss M, Foley KS, Stewart RS, Jr., Yancey M. The use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect bacteria in amniotic fluid in pregnancies complicated by preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1471–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70093-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gomez R, Romero R, Edwin SS, David C. Pathogenesis of preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes associated with intraamniotic infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997;11:135–76. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yoon BH, Jun JK, Romero R, Park KH, Gomez R, Choi JH, Kim IO. Amniotic fluid inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha), neonatal brain white matter lesions, and cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:19–26. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hitti J, Krohn MA, Patton DL, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Hillier SL, Cassen EM, Eschenbach DA. Amniotic fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the risk of respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:50–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70437-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wenstrom KD, Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB, Cliver SP. Elevated second-trimester amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:546–50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70436-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yoon BH, Chang JW, Romero R. Isolation of Ureaplasma urealyticum from the amniotic cavity and adverse outcome in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:77–82. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Riggs JW, Blanco JD. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intraamniotic infection. Semin Perinatol. 1998;22:251–9. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(98)80013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Chang JW, Kim YA, Kim JC, Kim KS. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity with Ureaplasma urealyticum is associated with a robust host response in fetal, amniotic, and maternal compartments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1254–60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ghezzi F, Gomez R, Romero R, Yoon BH, Edwin SS, David C, Janisse J, Mazor M. Elevated interleukin-8 concentrations in amniotic fluid of mothers whose neonates subsequently develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;78:5–10. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Leviton A, Paneth N, Reuss ML, Susser M, Allred EN, Dammann O, Kuban K, Van Marter LJ, Pagano M, Hegyi T, et al. Maternal infection, fetal inflammatory response, and brain damage in very low birth weight infants. Developmental Epidemiology Network Investigators. Pediatr Res. 1999;46:566–75. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199911000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brocklehurst P. Infection and preterm delivery. BMJ. 1999;318:548–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7183.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dammann O, Leviton A. Role of the fetus in perinatal infection and neonatal brain damage. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2000;12:99–104. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200004000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ovalle A, Martinez MA, Gomez R, Saez J, Menares I, Aspillaga C, Schwarze JE. [Premature labor with intact membranes: microbiology of the amniotic fluid and lower genital tract and its relation with maternal and neonatal outcome] Rev Med Chil. 2000;128:985–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gravett MG, Hitti J, Hess DL, Eschenbach DA. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery: evidence for activation of the fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1404–13. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maymon E, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Berman S, Conoscenti G, Gomez R, Edwin S. Amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1149–55. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yoon BH, Oh SY, Romero R, Shim SS, Han SY, Park JS, Jun JK. An elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 level at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1162–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hitti J, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Murphy J, Hillier SL, Aura J, Eschenbach DA. Amniotic fluid infection, cytokines, and adverse outcome among infants at 34 weeks’ gestation or less. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1080–8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01567-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gibbs RS. The relationship between infections and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. Ann Periodontol. 2001;6:153–63. doi: 10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Patrick LA, Smith GN. Proinflammatory cytokines: a link between chorioamnionitis and fetal brain injury. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:705–9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Romero R, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Kalache K. Infection and prematurity and the role of preventive strategies. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:259–74. doi: 10.1016/s1084-2756(02)90121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Goncalves LF, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Intrauterine infection and prematurity. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:3–13. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yoon BH, Romero R, Lim JH, Shim SS, Hong JS, Shim JY, Jun JK. The clinical significance of detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:919–24. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00839-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yoon BH, Park CW, Chaiworapongsa T. Intrauterine infection and the development of cerebral palsy. BJOG. 2003;110(Suppl 20):124–7. doi: 10.1016/s1470-0328(03)00063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shim SS, Romero R, Hong JS, Park CW, Jun JK, Kim BI, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Park KH, Yoon BH, Shim SS, Jun JK, Syn HC. Amniotic fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha is a marker for the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm labor. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;58:84–90. doi: 10.1159/000078492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Hassan S, Erez O, Chaiworapongsa T, Mazor M. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl 3):17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim KW, Romero R, Park HS, Park CW, Shim SS, Jun JK, Yoon BH. A rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 bedside test for the detection of intraamniotic inflammation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:292–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Park CW, Lee SM, Park JS, Jun JK, Romero R, Yoon BH. The antenatal identification of funisitis with a rapid MMP-8 bedside test. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:497–502. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Papapanagiotou A, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Amniotic fluid interleukin-18 at mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis: relationship to intraamniotic microbial invasion and preterm delivery. BJOG. 2009;116:1743–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lee SE, Park IS, Romero R, Yoon BH. Amniotic fluid prostaglandin F2 increases even in sterile amniotic fluid and is an independent predictor of impending delivery in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:880–6. doi: 10.1080/14767050902994648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Novy MJ, Duffy L, Axthelm MK, Sadowsky DW, Witkin SS, Gravett MG, Cassell GH, Waites KB. Ureaplasma parvum or Mycoplasma hominis as sole pathogens cause chorioamnionitis, preterm delivery, and fetal pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:56–70. doi: 10.1177/1933719108325508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lee J, Oh KJ, Yang HJ, Park JS, Romero R, Yoon BH. The importance of intra-amniotic inflammation in the subsequent development of atypical chronic lung disease. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:917–23. doi: 10.1080/14767050902994705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cobo T, Palacio M, Navarro-Sastre A, Ribes A, Bosch J, Filella X, Gratacos E. Predictive value of combined amniotic fluid proteomic biomarkers and interleukin-6 in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:499–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gotsch F, Gotsch F, Romero R, Erez O, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kim SK, Hassan S, Yeo L. The preterm parturition syndrome and its implications for understanding the biology, risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(Suppl 2):5–23. doi: 10.1080/14767050902860690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Miller JL, Harman C, Weiner C, Baschat AA. Perinatal outcomes after second trimester detection of amniotic fluid viral genome in asymptomatic patients. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:140–3. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Soto E, Romero R, Richani K, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T, Vaisbuch E, Mittal P, Erez O, Gotsch F, Mazor M, et al. Evidence for complement activation in the amniotic fluid of women with spontaneous preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:983–92. doi: 10.3109/14767050902994747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Kim CJ, Seok KS, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Sanders K, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Oh KJ, Lee SE, Jung H, Kim G, Romero R, Yoon BH. Detection of ureaplasmas by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with cervical insufficiency. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:261–8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cobo T, Palacio M, Martinez-Terron M, Navarro-Sastre A, Bosch J, Filella X, Gratacos E. Clinical and inflammatory markers in amniotic fluid as predictors of adverse outcomes in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Park JS, Romero R, Yoon BH, Moon JB, Oh SY, Han SY, Ko EM. The relationship between amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 and funisitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1156–61. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Angus SR, Segel SY, Hsu CD, Locksmith GJ, Clark P, Sammel MD, Macones GA, Strauss JF, III, Parry S. Amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 indicates intra-amniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1232–8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Park JS, Romero R, Yoon BH, Moon JB, Oh SY, Han SY, Ko EM. The relationship between amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 and funisitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1156–61. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Kim CJ, Kim SH, Choi JH, Han TR. Fetal exposure to an intra-amniotic inflammation and the development of cerebral palsy at the age of three years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:675–81. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.104207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim CJ, Jun JK, Gomez R, Choi JH, Syn HC. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6: a sensitive test for antenatal diagnosis of acute inflammatory lesions of preterm placenta and prediction of perinatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:960–70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Kim CJ, Kim SH, Choi JH, Han TR. Fetal exposure to an intra-amniotic inflammation and the development of cerebral palsy at the age of three years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:675–81. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.104207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:817–24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Coultrip LL, Lien JM, Gomez R, Kapernick P, Khoury A, Grossman JH. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 determination in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:901–11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70057-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, Jun JK. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1130–6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yoon BH, Romero R, Lim JH, Shim SS, Hong JS, Shim JY, Jun JK. The clinical significance of detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:919–24. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00839-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, Kusanovic JP, Bik EM, Gotsch F, Kim CJ, Erez O, Edwin S, Relman DA. Microbial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Marconi C, de Andrade Ramos BR, Peracoli JC, Donders GG, da Silva MG. Amniotic fluid interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-6, but not interleukin-8 correlate with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:549–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, Wu YK, Sabo V, Mazor M, Hobbins JC. Intraamniotic infection and the onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:661–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Romero R, Ghidini A, Mazor M, Behnke E. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in premature rupture of membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1991;34:769–78. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199112000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Gonzalez R, Diamond MP, Baumann P, Araneda H, Kenney JS, Cotton DB, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white blood cell count, interleukin-6, and gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:839–51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90014-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Averbuch B, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I, Chaim W, Vardi H, Horowitz S, Shuster M. Intra-uterine infection in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal characteristics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;62:25–9. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Shim SS, Romero R, Hong JS, Park CW, Jun JK, Kim BI, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Oh KJ, Lee KA, Sohn YK, Park CW, Hong JS, Romero R, Yoon BH. Intraamniotic infection with genital mycoplasmas exhibits a more intense inflammatory response than intraamniotic infection with other microorganisms in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:211–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Kim CJ, Seok KS, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Sanders K, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Seong HS, Lee SE, Kang JH, Romero R, Yoon BH. The frequency of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and histologic chorioamnionitis in women at term with intact membranes in the presence or absence of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lee SM, Lee KA, Kim SM, Park CW, Yoon BH. The risk of intra-amniotic infection, inflammation and histologic chorioamnionitis in term pregnant women with intact membranes and labor. Placenta. 2011;32:516–21. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cherouny PH, Pankuch GA, Botti JJ. Occult intraamniotic infection at the time of midtrimester genetic amniocentesis: a reassessment. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1994;2:136–9. doi: 10.1155/S1064744994000530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Montuclard B, Guibert M, Ville Y, Frydman R, Fernandez H. [Does asymptomatic amniotic infection in the second trimester really exist?] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1996;25:186–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yoon BH, Oh SY, Romero R, Shim SS, Han SY, Park JS, Jun JK. An elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 level at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1162–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Morency AM, Rallu F, Laferriere C, Bujoldg E. Eradication of intra-amniotic Streptococcus mutans in a woman with a short cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:898–902. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32269-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hassan S, Romero R, Hendler I, Gomez R, Khalek N, Espinoza J, Nien JK, Berry SM, Bujold E, Camacho N, et al. A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:13–9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, Goncalves LF, Nien JK, Soto E, Khalek N, Camacho N, Hendler I, Mittal P, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:706–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.4081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kiefer DG, Keeler SM, Rust OA, Wayock CP, Vintzileos AM, Hanna N. Is midtrimester short cervix a sign of intraamniotic inflammation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:374–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS, Mazaki-Tovi S, Nhan-Chang CL, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Yeo L, Mittal P, Yoon BH, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gonzalez R. Idiopathic vaginal bleeding during pregnancy as the only clinical manifestation of intrauterine infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:31–7. doi: 10.1080/14767050500217863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Linzey EM, Braly P. The use of amniocentesis in patients with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54:226–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Miller JM, Jr., Pupkin MJ, Hill GB. Bacterial colonization of amniotic fluid from intact fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:796–804. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90458-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bobitt JR, Hayslip CC, Damato JD. Amniotic fluid infection as determined by transabdominal amniocentesis in patients with intact membranes in premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:947–52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90090-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wallace RL, Herrick CN. Amniocentesis in the evaluation of premature labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:483–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Garite TJ, Freeman RK. Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:539–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cotton DB, Hill LM, Strassner HT, Platt LD, Ledger WJ. Use of amniocentesis in preterm gestation with ruptured membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wahbeh CJ, Hill GB, Eden RD, Gall SA. Intra-amniotic bacterial colonization in premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:739–43. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90558-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hameed C, Tejani N, Verma UL, Archbald F. Silent chorioamnionitis as a cause of preterm labor refractory to tocolytic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149:726–30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90111-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Broekhuizen FF, Gilman M, Hamilton PR. Amniocentesis for gram stain and culture in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:316–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Weible DR, Randall HW., Jr. Evaluation of amniotic fluid in preterm labor with intact membranes. J Reprod Med. 1985;30:777–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Feinstein SJ, Vintzileos AM, Lodeiro JG, Campbell WA, Weinbaum PJ, Nochimson DJ. Amniocentesis with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:147–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ, Escoto DT, Mirochnick MH. Qualitative amniotic fluid volume versus amniocentesis in predicting infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:579–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gravett MG, Hummel D, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Preterm labor associated with subclinical amniotic fluid infection and with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:229–37. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198602000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Leigh J, Garite TJ. Amniocentesis and the management of premature labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:500–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Duff P, Kopelman JN. Subclinical intra-amniotic infection in asymptomatic patients with refractory preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:756–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Romero R, Emamian M, Wan M, Quintero R, Hobbins JC, Mitchell MD. Prostaglandin concentrations in amniotic fluid of women with intra-amniotic infection and preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:1461–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80245-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Iams JD, Clapp DH, Contos DA, Whitehurst R, Ayers LW, O’Shaughnessy RW. Does extra-amniotic infection cause preterm labor? Gas-liquid chromatography studies of amniotic fluid in amnionitis, preterm labor, and normal controls. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:365–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Romero R, Mazor M. Infection and preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1988;31:553–84. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198809000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, Wu YK, Sabo V, Mazor M, Hobbins JC. Intraamniotic infection and the onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:661–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins JC, Mazor M, Edberg S. The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:114–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90503-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Romero R, Mazor M, Wu YK, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Mitchell MD, Hobbins JC. Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12:262–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:817–24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Skoll MA, Moretti ML, Sibai BM. The incidence of positive amniotic fluid cultures in patients preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:813–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90407-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Romero R, Shamma F, Avila C, Jimenez C, Callahan R, Nores J, Mazor M, Brekus CA, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. VI. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in twin gestations with preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:757–61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91063-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Romero R, Jimenez C, Lohda AK, Nores J, Hanaoka S, Avila C, Callahan R, Mazor M, Hobbins JC, Diamond MP. Amniotic fluid glucose concentration: a rapid and simple method for the detection of intraamniotic infection in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:968–74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91106-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Romero R, Avila C, Santhanam U, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin 6 in preterm labor. Association with infection. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1392–400. doi: 10.1172/JCI114583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ, Bieniarz A. Correlation of amniotic fluid glucose concentration and intraamniotic infection in patients with preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1105–10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90480-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Romero R, Quintero R, Nores J, Avila C, Mazor M, Hanaoka S, Hagay Z, Merchant L, Hobbins JC. Amniotic fluid white blood cell count: a rapid and simple test to diagnose microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:821–30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90423-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Romero R, Mazor M, Morrotti R, Avila C, Oyarzun E, Insunza A, Parra M, Behnke E, Montiel F, Cassell GH. Infection and labor. VII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:129–33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91845-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Romero R, Gonzalez R, Sepulveda W, Brandt F, Ramirez M, Sorokin Y, Mazor M, Treadwell MC, Cotton DB. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1086–91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)80043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Coultrip LL, Grossman JH. Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1231–42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91694-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ. Comparison of gram stain, leukocyte esterase activity, and amniotic fluid glucose concentration in predicting amniotic fluid culture results in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1092–5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)80044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Gibbs RS, Romero R, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA, Sweet RL. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1515–28. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91628-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. The association of occult amniotic fluid infection with gestational age and neonatal outcome among women in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:351–7. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199203000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Romero R, Nores J, Mazor M, Sepulveda W, Oyarzun E, Parra M, Insunza A, Montiel F, Behnke E, Cassell GH. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity during term labor. Prevalence and clinical significance. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:543–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Hillier SL, Witkin SS, Krohn MA, Watts DH, Kiviat NB, Eschenbach DA. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:941–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Gonzalez R, Diamond MP, Baumann P, Araneda H, Kenney JS, Cotton DB, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white blood cell count, interleukin-6, and gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:839–51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90014-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Wener MH, Kiviat NB, Eschenbach DA. Characteristics of women in preterm labor associated with elevated C-reactive protein levels. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:509–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Diamond MP, Kenney JS, Ramirez M, Fidel PL, Sorokin Y, Cotton D, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin-6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:805–16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Coultrip LL, Lien JM, Gomez R, Kapernick P, Khoury A, Grossman JH. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 determination in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:901–11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70057-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Averbuch B, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I, Chaim W, Vardi H, Horowitz S, Shuster M. Intra-uterine infection in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: maternal and neonatal characteristics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;62:25–9. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Font GE, Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ, Myles TD, Janda W, Bieniarz A. Catalase activity as a predictor of amniotic fluid culture results in preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:656–8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00026-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Gomez R, Ghezzi F, Romero R, Munoz H, Tolosa JE, Rojas I. Premature labor and intra-amniotic infection. Clinical aspects and role of the cytokines in diagnosis and pathophysiology. Clin Perinatol. 1995;22:281–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Carroll SG, Papaioannou S, Ntumazah IL, Philpott-Howard J, Nicolaides KH. Lower genital tract swabs in the prediction of intrauterine infection in preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:54–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Yoon BH, Jun JK, Park KH, Syn HC, Gomez R, Romero R. Serum C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and amniotic fluid white blood cell count in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:1034–40. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00339-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yoon BH, Yang SH, Jun JK, Park KH, Kim CJ, Romero R. Maternal blood C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and temperature in preterm labor: a comparison with amniotic fluid white blood cell count. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:231–7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00380-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Rizzo G, Capponi A, Rinaldo D, Tedeschi D, Arduini D, Romanini C. Interleukin-6 concentrations in cervical secretions identify microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:812–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Markenson GR, Martin RK, Tillotson-Criss M, Foley KS, Stewart RS, Jr., Yancey M. The use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect bacteria in amniotic fluid in pregnancies complicated by preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1471–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70093-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Hussey MJ, Levy ES, Pombar X, Meyer P, Strassner HT. Evaluating rapid diagnostic tests of intra-amniotic infection: Gram stain, amniotic fluid glucose level, and amniotic fluid to serum glucose level ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:650–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70059-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Romero R, Gomez R, Ghezzi F, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Edwin SS, Berry SM. A fetal systemic inflammatory response is followed by the spontaneous onset of preterm parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:186–93. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Elimian A, Figueroa R, Canterino J, Verma U, guero-Rosenfeld M, Tejani N. Amniotic fluid complement C3 as a marker of intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:72–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Chang JW, Kim YA, Kim JC, Kim KS. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity with Ureaplasma urealyticum is associated with a robust host response in fetal, amniotic, and maternal compartments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1254–60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Greci LS, Gilson GJ, Nevils B, Izquierdo LA, Qualls CR, Curet LB. Is amniotic fluid analysis the key to preterm labor? A model using interleukin-6 for predicting rapid delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:172–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70269-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kara M, Ozden S, Arioglu P, Cetin A. The significance of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels in preterm labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;38:403–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Yoon BH, Chang JW, Romero R. Isolation of Ureaplasma urealyticum from the amniotic cavity and adverse outcome in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:77–82. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Gomez R, Romero R, Ghezzi F, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Berry SM. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:194–202. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70272-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Oyarzun E, Yamamoto M, Kato S, Gomez R, Lizama L, Moenne A. Specific detection of 16 micro-organisms in amniotic fluid by polymerase chain reaction and its correlation with preterm delivery occurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1115–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70115-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vlachopoulou A, Angelini E, Grassi C, Romanini C. Ultrasonographic assessment of the uterine cervix and interleukin-8 concentrations in cervical secretions predict intrauterine infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:86–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12020086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Gonzalez-Bosquet E, Cerqueira MJ, Dominguez C, Gasser I, Bermejo B, Cabero L. Amniotic fluid glucose and cytokines values in the early diagnosis of amniotic infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8:155–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199907/08)8:4<155::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Blackwell SC, Berry SM. Role of amniocentesis for the diagnosis of subclinical intra-amniotic infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11:541–7. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199912000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Locksmith GJ, Clark P, Duff P, Schultz GS. Amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels in women with preterm labor and suspected intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:1–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim M, Kim EC, Kim T, Park JS, Jun JK. Clinical implications of detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in the amniotic cavity with the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1130–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.109036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Angus SR, Segel SY, Hsu CD, Locksmith GJ, Clark P, Sammel MD, Macones GA, Strauss JF, III, Parry S. Amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 indicates intra-amniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1232–8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, Jun JK. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1130–6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Jacobsson B, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Andersch B, Bokstrom H, Holst RM, Nikolaitchouk N, Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H. Microbial invasion and cytokine response in amniotic fluid in a Swedish population of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:423–31. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Shim SS, Romero R, Hong JS, Park CW, Jun JK, Kim BI, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gonzalez R. Idiopathic vaginal bleeding during pregnancy as the only clinical manifestation of intrauterine infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:31–7. doi: 10.1080/14767050500217863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Holst RM, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Jacobsson B. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in cervical fluid in a population of Swedish women in preterm labor: relationship to microbial invasion of the amniotic fluid, intra-amniotic inflammation, and preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:551–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Chaiworapongsa T, Medina L, Kim YM, Yoon BH, Carstens M, Espinoza J, Iams JD, et al. A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:678–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Patel K, Sehgal PB, Tejani N. Evaluation of amniotic fluid cytokines in preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:241–7. doi: 10.1080/13506120500223241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Gonzalez R, Iams JD, et al. Antibiotic administration to patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes does not eradicate intra-amniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:167–73. doi: 10.1080/14767050601135485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kim KW, Romero R, Park HS, Park CW, Shim SS, Jun JK, Yoon BH. A rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 bedside test for the detection of intraamniotic inflammation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:292–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Lee SE, Romero R, Jung H, Park CW, Park JS, Yoon BH. The intensity of the fetal inflammatory response in intraamniotic inflammation with and without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:294–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Seong HS, Lee SE, Kang JH, Romero R, Yoon BH. The frequency of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and histologic chorioamnionitis in women at term with intact membranes in the presence or absence of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Lee SE, Romero R, Park CW, Jun JK, Yoon BH. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:633–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Park CW, Moon KC, Park JS, Jun JK, Yoon BH. The frequency and clinical significance of intra-uterine infection and inflammation in patients with placenta previa and preterm labor and intact membranes. Placenta. 2009;30:613–8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Di Renzo GC. The great obstetrical syndromes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:633–5. doi: 10.1080/14767050902866804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS, Mazaki-Tovi S, Nhan-Chang CL, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Yeo L, Mittal P, Yoon BH, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.DiGiulio DB, Gervasi M, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Seok KS, Gomez R, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preeclampsia as assessed by cultivation and sequence-based methods. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:503–13. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Oh KJ, Lee SE, Jung H, Kim G, Romero R, Yoon BH. Detection of ureaplasmas by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with cervical insufficiency. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:261–8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.DiGiulio DB, Gervasi MT, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kusanovic JP, Seok KS, Gomez R, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:495–502. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Madan I, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Mittal P, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Alpay SZ, Yeo L, et al. The frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in women with placenta previa and vaginal bleeding: an unexpected observation. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:275–9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Kim CJ, Seok KS, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Sanders K, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Lee SE, Romero R, Lee SM, Yoon BH. Amniotic fluid volume in intra-amniotic inflammation with and without culture-proven amniotic fluid infection in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:39–44. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Erez O, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Mazaki-Tovi S, Chaiworapongsa T, Gotsch F, Fareed J, Hoppensteadt D, Than NG, et al. High tissue factor activity and low tissue factor pathway inhibitor concentrations in patients with preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:23–33. doi: 10.3109/14767050902994770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Lee SM, Lee KA, Kim SM, Park CW, Yoon BH. The risk of intra-amniotic infection, inflammation and histologic chorioamnionitis in term pregnant women with intact membranes and labor. Placenta. 2011;32:516–21. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Kim BJ, Romero R, Mi LS, Park CW, Shin PJ, Jun JK, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of oligohydramnios in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:131–6. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Chaiworapongsa T, Medina L, Kim YM, Yoon BH, Carstens M, Espinoza J, Iams JD, et al. A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:678–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Seong HS, Lee SE, Kang JH, Romero R, Yoon BH. The frequency of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and histologic chorioamnionitis in women at term with intact membranes in the presence or absence of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Kiefer DG, Keeler SM, Rust OA, Wayock CP, Vintzileos AM, Hanna N. Is midtrimester short cervix a sign of intraamniotic inflammation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:374–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS, Mazaki-Tovi S, Nhan-Chang CL, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Yeo L, Mittal P, Yoon BH, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Lee SM, Lee KA, Kim SM, Park CW, Yoon BH. The risk of intra-amniotic infection, inflammation and histologic chorioamnionitis in term pregnant women with intact membranes and labor. Placenta. 2011;32:516–21. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, Jun JK. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1130–6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Shim SS, Romero R, Hong JS, Park CW, Jun JK, Kim BI, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Lee SE, Romero R, Park CW, Jun JK, Yoon BH. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:633–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ranjard L, Poly F, Nazaret S. Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. Res Microbiol. 2000;151:167–77. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(00)00136-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Relman DA. The search for unrecognized pathogens. Science. 1999;284:1308–10. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Romero R, Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel L, Hassan S. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:21–39. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Vrachnis N, Vitoratos N, Iliodromiti Z, Sifakis S, Deligeoroglou E, Creatsas G. Intrauterine inflammation and preterm delivery. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1205:118–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Tsekoura EA, Konstantinidou A, Papadopoulou S, Athanasiou S, Spanakis N, Kafetzis D, Antsaklis A, Tsakris A. Adenovirus genome in the placenta: association with histological chorioamnionitis and preterm birth. J Med Virol. 2010;82:1379–83. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim M, Kim EC, Kim T, Park JS, Jun JK. Clinical implications of detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in the amniotic cavity with the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1130–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.109036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Yoon BH, Romero R, Lim JH, Shim SS, Hong JS, Shim JY, Jun JK. The clinical significance of detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:919–24. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00839-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Kim CJ, Seok KS, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Sanders K, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Oh KJ, Lee SE, Jung H, Kim G, Romero R, Yoon BH. Detection of ureaplasmas by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with cervical insufficiency. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:261–8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Genazzani AR, Petraglia F, Facchinetti F, Galli PA, Volpe A. Lack of beta-endorphin plasma level rise in oxytocin-induced labor. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1985;19:130–4. doi: 10.1159/000299022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Romero R, Mazor M, Munoz H, Gomez R, Galasso M, Sherer DM. The preterm labor syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;734:414–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb21771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Maner WL, Garfield RE. Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35:465–73. doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Shi SQ, Maner WL, Mackay LB, Garfield RE. Identification of term and preterm labor in rats using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography signals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:235–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, Blumrick R, Balducci J, Novak-Antolic Z, Garfield RE. Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:228–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Wolfe HM. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or =15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1458–67. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, Goncalves LF, Nien JK, Soto E, Khalek N, Camacho N, Hendler I, Mittal P, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:706–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.4081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS, Mazaki-Tovi S, Nhan-Chang CL, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Yeo L, Mittal P, Yoon BH, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vlachopoulou A, Angelini E, Grassi C, Romanini C. Ultrasonographic assessment of the uterine cervix and interleukin-8 concentrations in cervical secretions predict intrauterine infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:86–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12020086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Athayde N, Romero R, Gomez R, Maymon E, Pacora P, Mazor M, Yoon BH, Fortunato S, Menon R, Ghezzi F, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases-9 in preterm and term human parturition. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8:213–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199909/10)8:5<213::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Oh SY, Han SY, Kim JC, Shim SS. The frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with a positive cervical fetal fibronectin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1137–42. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Gomez R, Romero R, Medina L, Nien JK, Chaiworapongsa T, Carstens M, Gonzalez R, Espinoza J, Iams JD, Edwin S, et al. Cervicovaginal fibronectin improves the prediction of preterm delivery based on sonographic cervical length in patients with preterm uterine contractions and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:350–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Holst RM, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Jacobsson B. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in cervical fluid in a population of Swedish women in preterm labor: relationship to microbial invasion of the amniotic fluid, intra-amniotic inflammation, and preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:551–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Erez O, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Moser A, Tam S, Leszyk J, Master SR, et al. Isobaric labeling and tandem mass spectrometry: a novel approach for profiling and quantifying proteins differentially expressed in amniotic fluid in preterm labor with and without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:261–80. doi: 10.3109/14767050903067386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1097–103. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP. Cervical incompetence: a reappraisal of an obstetric controversy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57:377–87. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200206000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Kelly T. The pathophysiology of premature rupture of the membranes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7:140–5. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199504000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Menon R, Fortunato SJ. Fetal membrane inflammatory cytokines: a switching mechanism between the preterm premature rupture of the membranes and preterm labor pathways. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:391–9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Hueston WJ. Preterm contractions in community settings: II. Predicting preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:43–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Macones GA, Segel SY, Stamilio DM, Morgan MA. Predicting delivery within 48 hours in women treated with parenteral tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:432–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Pircon RA, Strassner HT, Kirz DS, Towers CV. Controlled trial of hydration and bed rest versus bed rest alone in the evaluation of preterm uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:775–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90400-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Owen J, Brumfield C, Hauth JC. Management options in women with preterm uterine contractions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:814–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Owen J, Wenstrom KD, Hauth JC. Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy for prevention of preterm delivery: a double-blind trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:874–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70181-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, Jun JK. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1130–6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Shim SS, Romero R, Hong JS, Park CW, Jun JK, Kim BI, Yoon BH. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Lee SE, Romero R, Park CW, Jun JK, Yoon BH. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:633–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Kim CJ, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Yoo W, Dong Z, Topping V, Gotsch F, Yoon BH, Chi JG, Kim JS. The frequency, clinical significance, and pathological features of chronic chorioamnionitis: a lesion associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:1000–11. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Lee J, Romero R, Xu Y, Kim JS, Topping V, Yoo W, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Yoon BH, et al. A signature of maternal anti-fetal rejection in spontaneous preterm birth: chronic chorioamnionitis, anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, and C4d. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Romero R, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Friel LA, Erez O, Mazaki-Tovi S, Than NG, Hassan S, Tromp G. The use of high-dimensional biology (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) to understand the preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl 3):118–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01150.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Kim CJ, Seok KS, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Sanders K, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Gomez R, Romero R, Cassell GH. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6: correlation with upper genital tract microbial colonization and gestational age in women delivered after spontaneous labor versus indicated delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:606–12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90290-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Romero R, Gomez R, Araneda H. Cervical mucus inhibits microbial growth: a host defense mechnism to prevent ascending infection in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:A57. [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Eggert-Kruse W, Botz I, Pohl S, Rohr G, Strowitzki T. Antimicrobial activity of human cervical mucus. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:778–84. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.4.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Hein M, Helmig RB, Schonheyder HC, Ganz T, Uldbjerg N. An in vitro study of antibacterial properties of the cervical mucus plug in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:586–92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Hein M, Valore EV, Helmig RB, Uldbjerg N, Ganz T. Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:137–44. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Zervomanolakis I, Ott HW, Hadziomerovic D, Mattle V, Seeber BE, Virgolini I, Heute D, Kissler S, Leyendecker G, Wildt L. Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:1–20. doi: 10.1196/annals.1389.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Romero R, Nores J, Mazor M, Sepulveda W, Oyarzun E, Parra M, Insunza A, Montiel F, Behnke E, Cassell GH. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity during term labor. Prevalence and clinical significance. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:543–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Seong HS, Lee SE, Kang JH, Romero R, Yoon BH. The frequency of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and histologic chorioamnionitis in women at term with intact membranes in the presence or absence of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES