Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1991 Oct 25;19(20):5497–5506. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5497

The expression of murine Hox-2 genes is dependent on the differentiation pathway and displays a collinear sensitivity to retinoic acid in F9 cells and Xenopus embryos.

N Papalopulu 1, R Lovell-Badge 1, R Krumlauf 1
PMCID: PMC328948  PMID: 1682879

Abstract

In this paper we describe experiments that detail the response of murine Hox-2 genes to cellular differentiation and retinoic acid in cell culture. Hox-2 genes are transiently activated in differentiating ES cells even in the absence of retinoic acid (RA), indicating that their induction is a normal aspect of differentiation. Furthermore, in the continuous presence of RA F9 teratocarcinoma cells show a differential ability to maintain Hox-2 expression depending upon whether the cells follow a visceral or parietal endoderm pathway. These data suggest a clear dependence of Hox-2 expression on the degree and type of differentiation in different cells. However, RA also has dramatic differentiation independent effects on Hox-2 regulation. In ES cells the levels of Hox expression are greatly enhanced by exposure to RA, and in F9 cells of the visceral or parietal phenotype the continuous presence of RA is required to maintain these high levels. Nuclear run-on experiments illustrate that Hox-2 genes are active in F9 stem cells and that a large portion of the RA induction is mediated by post-transcriptional mechanisms. Therefore RA exerts its effects on Hox-2 expression by upregulating or modulating genes which are already active, rather than by turning-on silent genes. All nine Hox-2 genes are induced in F9 cells by RA and there is a direct correlation (collinearity) between gene order and the relative dose response of each gene to RA. In Xenopus embryos treated with RA, homologues of the Hox-2 genes also displayed a temporal and dose response collinearity with gene organisation. Together these findings suggest that the collinear response to RA is highly conserved in vertebrates and combined with the ability of RA to modify expression during cellular differentiation could be an important feature of the Hox-2 cluster itself used to generate the spatially-restricted patterns of gene expression in embryogenesis.

Full text

PDF
5497

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akam M. Hox and HOM: homologous gene clusters in insects and vertebrates. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):347–349. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90909-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balling R., Mutter G., Gruss P., Kessel M. Craniofacial abnormalities induced by ectopic expression of the homeobox gene Hox-1.1 in transgenic mice. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):337–347. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90848-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boncinelli E., Acampora D., Pannese M., D'Esposito M., Somma R., Gaudino G., Stornaiuolo A., Cafiero M., Faiella A., Simeone A. Organization of human class I homeobox genes. Genome. 1989;31(2):745–756. doi: 10.1139/g89-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breier G., Bućan M., Francke U., Colberg-Poley A. M., Gruss P. Sequential expression of murine homeo box genes during F9 EC cell differentiation. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2209–2215. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04486.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brockes J. P. Retinoids, homeobox genes, and limb morphogenesis. Neuron. 1989 Apr;2(4):1285–1294. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chisaka O., Capecchi M. R. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature. 1991 Apr 11;350(6318):473–479. doi: 10.1038/350473a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho K. W., De Robertis E. M. Differential activation of Xenopus homeo box genes by mesoderm-inducing growth factors and retinoic acid. Genes Dev. 1990 Nov;4(11):1910–1916. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.11.1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cho K. W., Morita E. A., Wright C. V., De Robertis E. M. Overexpression of a homeodomain protein confers axis-forming activity to uncommitted Xenopus embryonic cells. Cell. 1991 Apr 5;65(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90407-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deschamps J., de Laaf R., Joosen L., Meijlink F., Destrée O. Abundant expression of homeobox genes in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells correlates with chemically induced differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(5):1304–1308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deschamps J., de Laaf R., Verrijzer P., de Gouw M., Destrée O., Meijlink F. The mouse Hox2.3 homeobox-containing gene: regulation in differentiating pluripotent stem cells and expression pattern in embryos. Differentiation. 1987;35(1):21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1987.tb00147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dollé P., Izpisúa-Belmonte J. C., Falkenstein H., Renucci A., Duboule D. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature. 1989 Dec 14;342(6251):767–772. doi: 10.1038/342767a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dressler G. R., Gruss P. Anterior boundaries of Hox gene expression in mesoderm-derived structures correlate with the linear gene order along the chromosome. Differentiation. 1989 Sep;41(3):193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1989.tb00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Duboule D., Dollé P. The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1497–1505. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03534.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Durston A. J., Timmermans J. P., Hage W. J., Hendriks H. F., de Vries N. J., Heideveld M., Nieuwkoop P. D. Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature. 1989 Jul 13;340(6229):140–144. doi: 10.1038/340140a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Edwards M. K., McBurney M. W. The concentration of retinoic acid determines the differentiated cell types formed by a teratocarcinoma cell line. Dev Biol. 1983 Jul;98(1):187–191. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Giampaolo A., Acampora D., Zappavigna V., Pannese M., D'Esposito M., Carè A., Faiella A., Stornaiuolo A., Russo G., Simeone A. Differential expression of human HOX-2 genes along the anterior-posterior axis in embryonic central nervous system. Differentiation. 1989 Jun;40(3):191–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1989.tb00598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham A., Maden M., Krumlauf R. The murine Hox-2 genes display dynamic dorsoventral patterns of expression during central nervous system development. Development. 1991 May;112(1):255–264. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Krumlauf R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):367–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Lorimer J., McVey J. H., Tuddenham E. G., Krumlauf R. Characterization of a murine homeo box gene, Hox-2.6, related to the Drosophila Deformed gene. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1424–1438. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grover A., Adamson E. D. Evidence for the existence of an early common biochemical pathway in the differentiation of F9 cells into visceral or parietal endoderm: modulation by cyclic AMP. Dev Biol. 1986 Apr;114(2):492–503. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90213-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harvey R. P., Melton D. A. Microinjection of synthetic Xhox-1A homeobox mRNA disrupts somite formation in developing Xenopus embryos. Cell. 1988 Jun 3;53(5):687–697. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hogan B. L., Taylor A., Adamson E. Cell interactions modulate embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation into parietal or visceral endoderm. Nature. 1981 May 21;291(5812):235–237. doi: 10.1038/291235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Holland P. W., Hogan B. L. Expression of homeo box genes during mouse development: a review. Genes Dev. 1988 Jul;2(7):773–782. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.7.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunt P., Wilkinson D., Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest. Development. 1991 May;112(1):43–50. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Izpisúa-Belmonte J. C., Tickle C., Dollé P., Wolpert L., Duboule D. Expression of the homeobox Hox-4 genes and the specification of position in chick wing development. Nature. 1991 Apr 18;350(6319):585–589. doi: 10.1038/350585a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kessel M., Balling R., Gruss P. Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell. 1990 Apr 20;61(2):301–308. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90810-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kessel M., Gruss P. Murine developmental control genes. Science. 1990 Jul 27;249(4967):374–379. doi: 10.1126/science.1974085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krumlauf R., Holland P. W., McVey J. H., Hogan B. L. Developmental and spatial patterns of expression of the mouse homeobox gene, Hox 2.1. Development. 1987 Apr;99(4):603–617. doi: 10.1242/dev.99.4.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. LaRosa G. J., Gudas L. J. Early retinoic acid-induced F9 teratocarcinoma stem cell gene ERA-1: alternate splicing creates transcripts for a homeobox-containing protein and one lacking the homeobox. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3906–3917. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lewis E. B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978 Dec 7;276(5688):565–570. doi: 10.1038/276565a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lim T. M., Jaques K. F., Stern C. D., Keynes R. J. An evaluation of myelomeres and segmentation of the chick embryo spinal cord. Development. 1991 Sep;113(1):227–238. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.1.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maden M., Hunt P., Eriksson U., Kuroiwa A., Krumlauf R., Summerbell D. Retinoic acid-binding protein, rhombomeres and the neural crest. Development. 1991 Jan;111(1):35–43. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maden M., Ong D. E., Chytil F. Retinoid-binding protein distribution in the developing mammalian nervous system. Development. 1990 May;109(1):75–80. doi: 10.1242/dev.109.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maden M., Ong D. E., Summerbell D., Chytil F. Spatial distribution of cellular protein binding to retinoic acid in the chick limb bud. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):733–735. doi: 10.1038/335733a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maden M. The effect of vitamin A on the regenerating axolotl limb. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1983 Oct;77:273–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maden M. Vitamin A and pattern formation in the regenerating limb. Nature. 1982 Feb 25;295(5851):672–675. doi: 10.1038/295672a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mason I. J., Murphy D., Münke M., Francke U., Elliott R. W., Hogan B. L. Developmental and transformation-sensitive expression of the Sparc gene on mouse chromosome 11. EMBO J. 1986 Aug;5(8):1831–1837. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04434.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mason I. J., Taylor A., Williams J. G., Sage H., Hogan B. L. Evidence from molecular cloning that SPARC, a major product of mouse embryo parietal endoderm, is related to an endothelial cell 'culture shock' glycoprotein of Mr 43,000. EMBO J. 1986 Jul;5(7):1465–1472. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04383.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mavilio F., Simeone A., Boncinelli E., Andrews P. W. Activation of four homeobox gene clusters in human embryonal carcinoma cells induced to differentiate by retinoic acid. Differentiation. 1988;37(1):73–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1988.tb00798.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nohno T., Noji S., Koyama E., Ohyama K., Myokai F., Kuroiwa A., Saito T., Taniguchi S. Involvement of the Chox-4 chicken homeobox genes in determination of anteroposterior axial polarity during limb development. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1197–1205. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90274-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oliver G., De Robertis E. M., Wolpert L., Tickle C. Expression of a homeobox gene in the chick wing bud following application of retinoic acid and grafts of polarizing region tissue. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3093–3099. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07506.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ritchie H., Webster W. S. Parameters determining isotretinoin teratogenicity in rat embryo culture. Teratology. 1991 Jan;43(1):71–81. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420430109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ruberte E., Dolle P., Chambon P., Morriss-Kay G. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. II. Their differential pattern of transcription during early morphogenesis in mouse embryos. Development. 1991 Jan;111(1):45–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruberte E., Dolle P., Krust A., Zelent A., Morriss-Kay G., Chambon P. Specific spatial and temporal distribution of retinoic acid receptor gamma transcripts during mouse embryogenesis. Development. 1990 Feb;108(2):213–222. doi: 10.1242/dev.108.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ruiz i Altaba A., Jessell T. M. Retinoic acid modifies the pattern of cell differentiation in the central nervous system of neurula stage Xenopus embryos. Development. 1991 Aug;112(4):945–958. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.4.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Simeone A., Acampora D., Arcioni L., Andrews P. W., Boncinelli E., Mavilio F. Sequential activation of HOX2 homeobox genes by retinoic acid in human embryonal carcinoma cells. Nature. 1990 Aug 23;346(6286):763–766. doi: 10.1038/346763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Simeone A., Acampora D., Nigro V., Faiella A., D'Esposito M., Stornaiuolo A., Mavilio F., Boncinelli E. Differential regulation by retinoic acid of the homeobox genes of the four HOX loci in human embryonal carcinoma cells. Mech Dev. 1991 Mar;33(3):215–227. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(91)90029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sive H. L., Draper B. W., Harland R. M., Weintraub H. Identification of a retinoic acid-sensitive period during primary axis formation in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 1990 Jun;4(6):932–942. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.6.932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stern C. D., Jaques K. F., Lim T. M., Fraser S. E., Keynes R. J. Segmental lineage restrictions in the chick embryo spinal cord depend on the adjacent somites. Development. 1991 Sep;113(1):239–244. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.1.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Strickland S., Mahdavi V. The induction of differentiation in teratocarcinoma stem cells by retinoic acid. Cell. 1978 Oct;15(2):393–403. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Strickland S., Sawey M. J. Studies on the effect of retinoids on the differentiation of teratocarcinoma stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Dev Biol. 1980 Jul;78(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90319-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Strickland S., Smith K. K., Marotti K. R. Hormonal induction of differentiation in teratocarcinoma stem cells: generation of parietal endoderm by retinoic acid and dibutyryl cAMP. Cell. 1980 Sep;21(2):347–355. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90471-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sulik K. K., Cook C. S., Webster W. S. Teratogens and craniofacial malformations: relationships to cell death. Development. 1988;103 (Suppl):213–231. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.Supplement.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sundin O. H., Eichele G. A homeo domain protein reveals the metameric nature of the developing chick hindbrain. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1267–1276. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Thaller C., Eichele G. Characterization of retinoid metabolism in the developing chick limb bud. Development. 1988 Jul;103(3):473–483. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.3.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Thaller C., Eichele G. Identification and spatial distribution of retinoids in the developing chick limb bud. Nature. 1987 Jun 18;327(6123):625–628. doi: 10.1038/327625a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tickle C., Alberts B., Wolpert L., Lee J. Local application of retinoic acid to the limb bond mimics the action of the polarizing region. Nature. 1982 Apr 8;296(5857):564–566. doi: 10.1038/296564a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tickle C., Summerbell D., Wolpert L. Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature. 1975 Mar 20;254(5497):199–202. doi: 10.1038/254199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wagner M., Thaller C., Jessell T., Eichele G. Polarizing activity and retinoid synthesis in the floor plate of the neural tube. Nature. 1990 Jun 28;345(6278):819–822. doi: 10.1038/345819a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wilkinson D. G., Bhatt S., Cook M., Boncinelli E., Krumlauf R. Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature. 1989 Oct 5;341(6241):405–409. doi: 10.1038/341405a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilkinson D. G., Krumlauf R. Molecular approaches to the segmentation of the hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Aug;13(8):335–339. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90145-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wolgemuth D. J., Behringer R. R., Mostoller M. P., Brinster R. L., Palmiter R. D. Transgenic mice overexpressing the mouse homoeobox-containing gene Hox-1.4 exhibit abnormal gut development. Nature. 1989 Feb 2;337(6206):464–467. doi: 10.1038/337464a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wright C. V., Cho K. W., Hardwicke J., Collins R. H., De Robertis E. M. Interference with function of a homeobox gene in Xenopus embryos produces malformations of the anterior spinal cord. Cell. 1989 Oct 6;59(1):81–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90871-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES