Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening during transthoracic echocardiography: Cardiologist and vascular medicine specialist interpretation

Abstract

AIM: To study the interobserver variability between a cardiologist and vascular medicine specialist in the screening of the abdominal aorta during transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).

METHODS: Consecutive patients, > 55 years of age, underwent abdominal aortic imaging following standard TTE. Two cardiologists and one vascular medicine specialist performed a blinded review of the images. Interobserver agreement of abdominal aortic size was determined by the correlation coefficient and paired t test. Interobserver reliability for each cardiologist was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS: Ninety patients were studied. The mean age of patients was 72 ± 10 years and 48% were male. The mean aortic diameter was 2.31 ± 0.50 cm and 5 patients (5.5%) had an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The additional time required for the abdominal aortic images was 4.4 ± 0.9 min per patient. Interobserver agreement between the 2 cardiologist interpreters and the vascular medicine specialist was excellent (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). On Bland-Altman analysis of interobserver reliability, the 95% lower and upper limits for measurement by the cardiologists were 84% and 124% of that of the vascular specialist.

CONCLUSION: The assessment of the abdominal aorta during a routine TTE performed by a cardiologist is accurate in comparison to that of a vascular medicine specialist. In selected patients undergoing TTE, the detection rate of AAA is significant. Additional time and effort required to perform imaging of the abdominal aorta after TTE is less than 5 min.

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) affect approximately 5% of elderly men at risk factors of cardiovascular disease[1,2]. Most AAA are not detectable on physical examination and remain silent until discovered during radiologic testing for other reasons or when complications occur. The recommendation for abdominal aortic ultrasound screening for AAA by the United States Preventive Services Task Force in select populations (men, age > 64 years, history of tobacco use) and by several Vascular Societies are supported by evidence demonstrating a reduction in aneurysm-related mortality[3-6]. However, AAA screening has not been widely adopted due to differing criteria for screening and uncertainty about costs and insurance coverage[7-10]. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is frequently performed in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease who may be at risk for the development of AAA. Although not commonly appreciated, the equipment used for TTE is similar to that used for abdominal aortic ultrasound, and imaging of the abdominal aorta can easily be performed as an adjunct to a standard echocardiographic examination.

The prevalence of AAA detected during TTE is estimated as 0.8%-6.5% depending on the demographic characteristics of the population screened[11-17]. Furthermore, the additional time required for AAA screening after TTE is generally less than 5 min. However, little data is available on who should interpret the study. Therefore, we designed a protocol for screening the abdominal aorta during TTE with the primary objective of comparing the interobserver variability between a cardiologist and vascular medicine specialist (i.e., the “gold standard”).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

We prospectively evaluated 90 consecutive patients (age > 55 years old) scheduled for a clinically indicated TTE at the Cleveland Clinic Florida between November 1, 2005 and April 1, 2006. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from the electronic medical record. It was not known to the sonographer or the investigators at the time of the study whether the patient had a history of AAA. The same sonographer, licensed in both cardiac and vascular imaging performed all studies. Patient data were recorded with patient identifier numbers for confidentiality, and a database was secured with access only to the principal investigator and co-investigators.

Ancillary abdominal aortic ultrasound

An ancillary aortic ultrasound was performed in all patients after the routine TTE images were completed and immediately after the subcostal images were obtained. A standard ultrasound machine with harmonic imaging mode and cardiac presets was utilized (Philips iE33; Philips Medical System, Andover MA or Sequoia C512; Acuson, Mountain View, CA). The transducer probe and frequency were not changed. Images of the proximal, mid and distal abdominal aorta in transverse and longitudinal planes were obtained (Figure 1). Images were digitally clipped and stored for future review and labeled with a study number. In a subgroup of 19 patients, the time taken to perform the additional abdominal aortic images was recorded.

Figure 1.

The mid abdominal aorta image obtained during transthoracic echocardiography. A: Transverse image; B: Longitudinal view.

Measurements

Two staff cardiologists (Novaro GM, Asher CR) and one vascular medicine specialist (Fernandez Jr BB) made off-line measurements of the abdominal aorta. Measurements were made in 10 patients (30 segments) using the outer-edge to outer edge convention of the proximal, mid and distal aortic transverse projection. The readers were blinded to patient information. For the purpose of the study, AAA was defined as a diameter ≥ 3 cm.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons were made between the cardiologists and vascular medicine specialist using paired t tests and Pearson’s coefficient of correlation (r). Bland-Altman difference plots were constructed to evaluate interobserver agreement between each Cardiologist’s interpretation compared with that of the vascular medicine specialist. These plots depict the mean of the aortic measurements on the x-axis, and the difference and 95% limit of agreement on the y-axis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used SAS 9.1 (Cary, NC) and R 2.6.1 for all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 90 patients, 43 men (48%), with an average age of 72 ± 10 years and body mass index (kg/m²) of 26.4 ± 5.6, 57 (63%) hypertensive, 51 (57%) smokers, 29 (32%) with coronary artery disease and 16 (18%) with diabetes. All abdominal aorta segments (proximal, mid and distal) were visualized adequately for measurement in 77% of patients. The infrarenal segment was seen in 93%, with the distal abdominal aorta least often well seen. The mean aortic diameter was 2.31 ± 0.50 cm. Five patients (5.5%) had abdominal aortic aneurysms (defined as a diameter ≥ 3.0 cm) ranging from 3.4 to 5.1 cm. Among the 5 patients with AAA, 2 were known and comparison computed tomography within 6 mo showed similar sizes (one patient had an AAA of 5.3 cm measured by computed tomography and of 5.1 cm measured by TTE and one patient had an AAA of 3.6 cm measured by computed tomography and of 3.9 cm measured by TTE). In 2 patients with small AAA, no confirmation was obtained due to advanced age and comorbid conditions. The additional time required for the abdominal aortic images was 4.4 ± 0.9 min per patient.

Interobserver agreement between the 2 cardiologist interpreters and the vascular medicine specialist was excellent (P > 0.05 for all comparisons; cardiologist 1 vs cardiologist 2, P = 0.531; cardiologist 1 vs vascular medicine, P = 0.728; cardiologist 2 vs vascular medicine, P = 0.432; Figure 2). Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation at all 3 levels of aortic diameters. On Bland-Altman analysis of interobserver reliability, the 95% lower and upper limits for measurement by cardiologist 1 were 84.4% and 123.8% of that of the vascular medicine specialist and for cardiologist 2 they were 88.9% and 124.8% of that of the vascular medicine specialist. These differences were clinically insignificant with most measurements within 7 mm of the “gold standard” measurement (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Linear regression analysis comparing aortic diameters measured in centimeters between cardiologists and a vascular medicine specialist. A: Between cardiologist 1 and vascular medicine specialist (r = 0.70); B: Between cardiologist 2 and vascular medicine specialist (r = 0.66).

Figure 3.

Bland-Altman plot of interobserver reliability showing 95% limits of agreement for measurement by cardiologists vs the vascular medicine specialist. The units on the y-axis are centimeters. A: Cardiologist 1 vs the vascular medicine specialist; B: Cardiologist 2 vs the vascular medicine specialist.

DISCUSSION

In our study, we demonstrate that the interpretation of the abdominal aorta performed by a cardiologist during a TTE is accurate compared with that by a vascular medicine specialist. We found a similar prevalence of AAAs (5.5%) in a select group of patients 55 years of age and older as reported by previous studies and a limited (< 5 min) additional time required for abdominal imaging after a standard TTE.

AAA occur in 1-2% of the general population, most often in elderly man with a prior history of tobacco use or hypertension[1,2]. Current guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force, Societies of Vascular Surgery and Medicine and Medicare recommend and support screening for AAA in selected groups of at-risk patients on the basis that screening is cost-effective and reduces aneurysm-related mortality[3-7]. Screening is underutilized because of the lack of consensus criteria and uncertain reimbursement[10]. Therefore, since the population of patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing TTE and those who are at risk for AAA have similar risk factors, abdominal aortic imaging during TTE is appealing and increasingly studied. Echocardiography continues to be a widely performed and reimbursable test particularly in patients with cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease and thoracic aortic disease.

The prevalence of AAA detected during supplementary imaging during TTE ranges from 0.8%-6.5%[11-17]. These studies have included both unselected and selected populations of patients chosen for screening undergoing routine TTE examinations. Confirmatory testing has shown favorable accuracy for TTE screening compared with a gold standard test (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or abdominal aortic ultrasound). Several studies have also demonstrated that imaging of the abdominal aorta can be performed with the same equipment and in limited time for most patients, usually less than 5 min[14,16].

Most studies on AAA screening during TTE do not identify the training of the sonographer performing the examinations or the background of the interpreting physician. Although, cardiologists routinely make measurements of the ascending aorta during TTE, they do no usually evaluate the abdominal aorta. Conventions for measuring the ascending aorta vary, including inner edge to inner edge and leading edge to leading edge techniques, differing from standard measurements made by vascular medicine specialists. In addition, the abdominal aorta has considerably more atheroma than the ascending aorta, which confounds measuring the outer edge of a blood vessel. Therefore, it is important to establish that cardiologists without vascular training can accurately measure the abdominal aorta and detect AAA. We utilized a sonographer with training in both cardiac and vascular imaging. It cannot be expected that a cardiac sonographer without vascular training can image the abdominal aorta with similar quality.

We did not systematically compare the measurement of the aorta made by TTE to a gold standard test and therefore sensitivity and specificity cannot be determined. Intraobserver variability was not performed.

The assessment of the abdominal aorta during a routine TTE performed by a cardiologist is accurate in comparison to that of a vascular medicine specialist. In selected patients that fit the criteria for AAA screening, TTE detection of AAA is significant. Additional time and effort required to perform imaging of the abdominal aorta after TTE is less than 5 min.

COMMENTS

Background

Most abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA) are not detectable on physical examination and remain silent until discovered during radiologic testing for other reasons or when complications occur. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is frequently performed in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease who may be at risk for the development of AAA. Although not commonly appreciated, the equipment used for TTE is similar to that used for abdominal aortic ultrasound, and imaging of the abdominal aorta can easily be done as an adjunct to a standard echocardiographic examination. Furthermore, the additive time required for AAA screening after TTE is generally less than 5 min. However, little data is available on who should interpret the study.

Research frontiers

Most studies on AAA screening during TTE do not identify the training of the sonographer performing the examinations or the background of the interpreting physician. Although, cardiologists routinely make measurements of the ascending aorta during TTE they do no usually evaluate the abdominal aorta. Conventions for measuring the ascending aorta vary including inner edge to inner edge and leading edge to leading edge techniques, differing from standard measurements made by vascular medicine specialists. In addition, the abdominal aorta has considerably more atheroma than the ascending aorta which confounds measuring the outer edge of a blood vessel. Therefore, it is important to establish that cardiologists without vascular training can accurately measure the abdominal aorta and detect AAA. This research utilized a sonographer with training in both cardiac and vascular imaging.

Innovations and breakthroughs

In this study, authors investigated interobserver variability in the evaluation of TTE to assess the AAA. Two cardiologists and one specialist of vascular medicine were compared for their ability to accurately assess the TTE findings to diagnose AAA, since TTE is routinely used. They conclude that the diagnosis of AAA by routine TTE is as accurately done by a cardiologist as compared with a vascular medicine specialist.

Applications

The assessment of the abdominal aorta during a routine TTE performed by a cardiologist is accurate in comparison to a Vascular Medicine specialist. In selected patients that fit criteria for AAA screening, TTE detection of AAA is significant.

Peer review

This is an important work and it is well performed. The manuscript is well written and sufficiently well illustrated.