Skip to main content
Annals of Saudi Medicine logoLink to Annals of Saudi Medicine
. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):365–368. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.55166

Prevalence of oral lesions among Saudi dental patients

Azizah Al-Mobeeriek 1,, Abdullah M AlDosari 1
PMCID: PMC3290046  PMID: 19700894

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Few studies have been conducted in the Saudi population on oral mucosal lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the type and extent of oral lesions in a study among dental patients at a college of dentistry in Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Over a 3-year period, 2552 dental outpatients were interviewed and investigated clinically for the presence of oral mucosal conditions. A thorough oral clinical examination was performed, including a radiographic examination. The diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically when necessary.

RESULTS:

Of 383 (15.0%) patients found to have oral mucosal lesions, females constituted 57.7% (n=221) and males 42.3% (n=162). The age range of the patients was between 15 to 73 years with a mean age of 38.2 years. The most commonly affected age group was 31 to 40 years, which comprised 21.4% (n=82) of all affected individuals. The least affected age group were individuals older than 61 years. The most common lesion was Fordyce granules (3.8%; n=98), followed by leukoedema (3.4%; n=86) and traumatic lesions (ulcer, erosion) in 1.9% (n=48). Tongue abnormalities were present in 4.0% (n=101) of all oral conditions observed, ranging from 1.4% (n=36) for fissured tongue to 0.1% (n=2) for bifid tongue. Other findings detected were torous platinus (1.3%; n=34), mandibular tori (0.1%; n=2) aphthous ulcer (0.4%; n=10), herpes simplex (0.3%; n=7), frictional hyperkeratosis (0.9%; n=23), melanosis (0.6%; n=14), lichen planus (0.3%; n=9) and nicotinic stomatitis (0.5%; n=13).

CONCLUSION:

The findings of this study provide information on the types and prevalence of oral lesions among Saudi dental patients. This provides baseline data for future studies about the prevalence of oral lesions in the general population.


Few studies have been conducted in the Saudi population on oral mucosal lesions. An 8-year retrospective study using biopsied specimens found that focal fibrous hyperplasia (FFH), pyogenic granuloma (PG), peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) and peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) constitute 9% of all biopsied lesions.1 A 5-year (1985-1990) survey in Saudi Arabia indicated that 64.6% of biopsied lesions were benign tumors, hyperplasia and granulomas, 20.3% were cysts and cyst-like lesions and 4.8% were other mucous membrane lesions.2

The prevalence of leukoplakia was studied in relationship to tobacco habits and was found to be 11.4% in the Gizan area of Saudi Arabia.3,4 The oral cavity was ranked as one of the most common ten malignancies from 1975-2006.5 The tongue was the most affected site (30.1%), mostly on the lateral borders of the anterior two-thirds, followed by the oropharynx, lips, cheeks, gingiva and floor of the mouth, palate and salivary gland.6 Oral health survey data are essential for proper health planning programs. In addition, most of the conducted studies were of tumors or ulcers and did not include all oral lesions in adult populations. The pattern of disease is also changing due to increasing awareness, changes in lifestyle and increasing interest in oral health. In Saudi Arabia there is a great need for clinical studies to establish baseline data on the prevalence of oral lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the type and the prevalence of oral lesions among patients seeking dental care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was carried out on adult Saudi dental outpatients who attended the Oral Diagnostic Clinic at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for an oral examination and a dental treatment plan. The study sample included adult subjects who were older than 15 years of age. The college is an open public facility and referral hospital. A total of 2552 patients were interviewed and clinically investigated for the presence of oral lesions from June 2002- to December 2005. History taking and a thorough oral clinical examination was performed, including a radiographic examination. The type and distribution of the oral mucosal conditions was recorded. An interview was conducted to collect information. The examination was performed by a single examiner. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Among the 2552 patients, only 383 patients (15.0%) had oral lesions. Females constituted 57.7% (n=221) and males 42.3% (n=162). The age range of the patients was between 15 to 73 years. The mean age of the sample group was 38.2 years. The mean age for females was 33.0 years and 47.1 years for males. Of the total sample, the most commonly affected age was between 31 to 40 years (21.4%), followed by 15 to 20 years (18.5%), and 21 to 30 years (17.8%) (Figure 1). Twenty-four patients (0.9%) admitted smoking habits and 196 patients (7.7%) had a systemic disease, but there were no differences between smokers and non-smokers, or between healthy people and those with systemic diseases.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Prevalence of oral conditions by age range and sex (n=383).

Oral lesions were more prevalent among females than males (Table 1). Fordyce granules were observed in 3.84% (n=98) on the buccal and labial mucosa, and were significantly more common in females. Females showed a higher prevalence than males, accounting for two-thirds of the affected individuals (n=24), but the difference was not statistically significant. Both torous platinus and mandibular tori wre more common in females, but the difference was not statistically significant. Other lesions were significantly more common among females: aphthous ulcer and herpes simplex. On the other hand, frictional hyperkeratosis was more common among males than females, but the difference was not statistically significant. Other pathologies detected were excessive melanin pigmentation (melanosis). Females showed a higher incidence than males, but the difference was not statistically significant. Both lichen planis and nicotinic stomatitis were significantly higher among males.

Table 1.

Distribution of oral conditions in Saudi dental patients (n=2552).

Type Males Females Total
No. % of total sample No. % of total sample No. % of total sample
Fordyce granulesa 30 1.18 68 2.67 98 3.84
Leukoedemab 53 2.08 33 1.29 86 3.37
Traumatic lesions (ulcers, erosions) 14 0.55 34 1.33* 48 1.88
Torous platinus 0 0 34 1.33 34 1.33
Frictional hyperkeratosis 14 0.55 9 0.35 23 0.90
Melanosis 5 0.195 9 0.35 14 0.55
Nicotinic stomatitisa 11 0.43 2 0.08 13 0.51
Aphthaea 0 0 10 0.39 10 0.39
Lichen planus 7 0.27 2 0.08 9 0.35
Herpes simplexc 0 0 7 0.27 7 0.27
Mandibular tori 0 0 2 0.08 2 0.08
Non-nicotinic stomatitis 2 0.08 2 0.08 4 0.16
Focal fibrous hyperplasia 2 0.08 3 0.12 5 0.195

Tongue lesions
 Fissured tongue 12 0.47 24 0.94 36 1.41
 Bifid tongue 0 0 2 0.08 2 0.08
 Glossitis 0 0 3 0.12 3 0.12
 Scalloped tongue 0 0 8 0.31 8 0.31
 Lingual varcosis 2 0.08 8 0.31 10 0.39
 Geographic tongue 7 0.27 6 0.24 13 0.51
 Hairy tonguec 10 0.39 4 0.16 14 0.55
 Tongue tie 2 0.08 12 0.47 15* 0.59
 Total tongue lesions 33 1.3 67 2.6 101 3.96

Total 171 282 454
*

One case missing sex;

a

P<.005,

b

P=.0001,

c

P<.05 males vs. females

Tongue abnormalities were present in 3.96% (n=101) of total sample and in 26.4% of all oral conditions observed. The prevalence of tongue lesions was higher among females than males, but the difference was not statistically significant. the most common tongue condition was fissured tongue, constituting about 35.6% of all tongue conditions. it is also ranked fourth most common lesion in our population. Hairy tongue was present in 0.55% of the sample (n=14) and was significantly more common in males than in females. Tongue tie was also significanlty more common in females than males. Other tongue lesions were lingual varcosis. Females showed a higher incidence than males, but the difference was no statistically significant. Both bifid tonge and glossitis had a low occurrence and were seen manily among females.

DISCUSSION

Oral soft tissue lesions present a significant health problem with a considerable morbidity. Despite its importance, there are few reports on its prevalence among the Saudi population and its association with oral habits, when compared to dental caries and periodontal diseases.

In accordance with others,1,2 our results showed a higher prevalence of oral mucosal lesions among females (57.7%) and young adults (31-40 years) (21.4%). Other reports, however, indicated that oral lesions tend to increase with age in association with tobacco consumption and denture use.7,8 The age of the patient is crucial in patient assessment, treatment planning and health education.

The present study suggests the distribution pattern of oral diseases in Saudi Arabia is similar to other countries. Benign lesions are more common in the young and females while cancerous and precancerous lesions are more common in the elderly.9,10 Along with other investigations,16,11 it may also shed some light on the pattern of oral diseases among the Saudi population. Reports from different regions of Saudi Arabia have shown that cancer and precancerous lesions are more common in elderly males36,11 in contrast to benign lesions, which are more common in females at a younger age.1,2

As in the report of Kovac-Kovacic and Skaleric in Slovenia,10 Fordyce granules were the most common oral condition and had a female predilection (10%). This lesion was not as common among Amazonian Indians (3.8%).12 Leukoedema was found to have a high prevalence among our study population. Similar findings have been reported among Kenyans (26%), the Swedish population (49.07%) and in the institutionalized elderly in South Africa (24.4%).1315 In contrast, leukoedema was not reported as one of the common soft tissue conditions among elderly Chinese.16 As in other studies, males were significantly more affected than females.11,17 Studies have demonstrated a positive association between smoking, tobacco use and leukoedema with a decline the size of the lesion after tobacco cessation.1720 Though not clear in our results, this may in general explain the male predominance of this condition.

Traumatic ulcer was the third most common soft tissue lesion. Females were affected more than males. It was also found to be one of the common soft tissue lesions in Spain, Italy, and Chile elderly and in the institutionalized elderly in Denmark.2124 The main reason among the elderly was poorly constructed dentures.2325

As in the to Kenya13 and in elderly Malaysians,26 frictional hyperkeratosis ranked as one of the most common oral mucosal lesions. This finding supports the results from the United States of America,27 China28 and Bangladesh,29 where keratotic lesions are a common clinical presentation possibly due to population differences, particularly in term of tobacco habits.

Consistent with data from China,28 tongue conditions were a frequent observation in our study, comprising almost one-third of the mucosal lesions. Fissured tongue ranked fourth among oral abnormalities and was the most common tongue conditions. Worldwide, fissured tongue occurrence varies, but remains a common tongue condition ranging from 28% among elderly Thai,30 27.3% among Amazonians,12 21.1% among Slovenians10 and 5.2% in Turkey.31 Fissured tongue was also one of the common tongue conditions, constituting 45.7% in Jordan.32

The findings of this study possibly provide important and missing information about the types and prevalence of oral lesions among Saudi dental patients and can serve as baseline data for future studies on the prevalence of different oral lesions in the general population.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Narty N, Masadomi H, Al-Gilani M, Al-Mobeerik A. Localized inflammatory hyperplasia of the oral cavity: clinico-pathological study of 164 cases. Saudi Dent J. 1994 Sep;6(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masadomi H, Algilani M, Narty N, Alsaif N, Salem G, Jul R, Schiodt T. Tumors, cyst, cyst-like and allied lesions of the jaws and oral mucosa in Riyadh, KSA. Saudi Dent J. 1992 Jan;4 (S1) Actaodontol-scand 1984 Feb;42(1):41-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salem G. Leukoplakia and tobacco habits in Gizan, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 1992 May;4(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabadi S. Cancer at Dhahran health center, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 1987;7(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.AlDosari AM. Preliminary study of oral cancer in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 1987;8(5):476–480. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Mobeeriek AF. Oral and upper aero-digestive tract malignancy. A review of a five-year experience. Ann of Saudi Med. 1998:257–259. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.1998.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shulman JD, Beach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F. The prevalence of oral mucosallesions in US adults: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Sep;135(9):1279–86. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kleinman DV, Swango PA, Pindborg JJ. Epidemiology of oral mucosal lesions in United States schoolchildren: 1986-87. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;22(4):243–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bouquot JE. Common oral lesions found during a mass screening examination. Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Jan;112(1):50–7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000 Aug;29(7):331–5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mani NJ. Preliminary report on prevalence of oral cancer and precancerous lesions among dental patients in Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985;(13):247–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1985.tb01915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.dos Santos PJ, Bessa CF, de Aguiar MC, do Carmo MA. Cross-sectional study of oral mucosal conditions among a central Amazonian Indian community, Brazil. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004 Jan;33(1):7–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Macigo FG, Mwaniki DL, Guthua SW. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a Kenyan population with special reference to oral leukoplakia. East Afr Med J. 1995 Dec;72(12):778–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Axell T. A prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions in an adult Swedish population. Odontol Revy. 1976;27(36):1–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Wyk CW, Farman AG, Staz J. Oral health status of institutionalized elderly Cape Coloreds from the Cape Peninsula of South Africa. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1971 Jul;5(4):179–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1977.tb01636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Corbet EF, Holmgren CJ, Phillipsen HP. Oral mucosal lesions in 65-74- year-old Hong Kong Chinese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;22:392–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01599.x. (5 Pt 2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Axell T, Henricsson V. Leukoedema-an epidemiologic study with special reference to the influence of tobacco habits. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981 Jun;9(3):142–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zain RB, Razak IA. Association between cigarette smoking and prevalence of oral mucosal lesions among Malaysian army personnel. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989 Jun;17(3):148–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gupta PC, Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ. Effect of cessation of tobacco use on the incidence of oral mucosal lesions in a 10-yr follow-up study of 12,212 users. Oral Dis. 1995 Mar;1(1):54–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1995.tb00158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reichart PA, Schmidtberg W, Samaranayake LP, Scheifele C. Betel quid associated oral lesions and oral Candida species in a female Cambodian cohort. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002 Sep;31(8):468–72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2002.00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garcia-Pola Vallejo MJ, Martinez Diaz-Canel AI, Garcia Martin JM, Gonzalez Garcia M. Risk factors for oral soft tissue lesions in an adult Spanish population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;30(4):277–85. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Campisi G, Margiotta V. Oral mucosal lesions and risk habits among men in an Italian study population. J Oral Pathol Med. 2001 Jan;30(1):22–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2001.300104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Espinoza I, Rojas R, Aranda W, Gamonal J. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly people in Santiago, Chile. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003 Nov;32(10):571–5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2003.00031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vigild M. Oral mucosal lesions among institutionalized elderly in Denmark. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987 Dec;15(6):309–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb01741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moskona D, Kaplan I. Oral health and treatment needs in a non-institutionalized elderly population: experience of a dental school associated geriatric clinic. Gerodontology. 1995 Dec;12(12):95–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1995.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taiyeb Ali TB, Razak IA, Raja Latifah RJ, Zain RB. An epidemiological survey of oral mucosal lesions among elderly Malaysians. Gerodontology. 1995 Jun;12(1):37–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1995.tb00128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bouquot JE, Gorlin RJ. Leukoplakia, lichen planus, and other oral keratoses in 23,616 white Americans over the age of 35 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986 Apr;61(4):373–81. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90422-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lin HC, Corbet EF, Lo EC. Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res. 2001 Jun;80(5):1486–90. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800052001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pearson N, Croucher R, Marcenes W, O'Farrell M. Prevalence of oral lesions among a sample of Bangladeshi medical users aged 40 years and over living in Tower Hamlets, UK. Int Dent J. 2001 Feb;51(1):30–4. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jainkittivong A, Aneksuk V, Langlais RP. Oral mucosal conditions in elderly dental patients. Oral Dis. 2002 Jul;8(4):218–23. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.01789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mumcu G, Cimilli H, Sur H, Hayran O, Atalay T. Prevalence and distribution of oral lesions: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Oral Dis. 2005 Mar;11(2):81–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2004.01062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Darwazeh AM, Pillai K. Prevalence of tongue lesions in 1013 Jordanian dental outpatients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;21(5):323–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Saudi Medicine are provided here courtesy of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

RESOURCES