Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1991 Nov 11;19(21):5923–5927. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.21.5923

Eukaryotic DNA does not form nucleosomes as readily as some prokaryotic DNA.

R C Getts 1, M J Behe 1
PMCID: PMC329048  PMID: 1945878

Abstract

Nucleosomal-length DNA was prepared from the genomic DNA of various prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms by limited nuclease digestion after reconstitution with core histones. The DNAs ranged in base composition from 26.5% to 72% guanosine-plus-cytosine (%GC). The nucleosomal-length DNAs were then used in a competitive reconstitution assay in order to quantitatively determine their relative abilities to form nucleosomes. The results of the assay indicate a linear dependence of the free energy of nucleosome formation on base composition and, surprisingly, show that several prokaryotic DNAs form nucleosomes as well as or better than eukaryotic DNAs.

Full text

PDF
5923

Images in this article

5925Image
on p.5925

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslauer K. J., Frank R., Blöcker H., Marky L. A. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3746–3750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broyles S. S., Pettijohn D. E. Interaction of the Escherichia coli HU protein with DNA. Evidence for formation of nucleosome-like structures with altered DNA helical pitch. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 5;187(1):47–60. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daban J. R., Cantor C. R. Structural and kinetic study of the self-assembly of nucleosome core particles. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 25;156(4):749–769. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew H. R. Can one measure the free energy of binding of the histone octamer to different DNA sequences by salt-dependent reconstitution? J Mol Biol. 1991 Jun 5;219(3):391–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90179-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FitzGerald P. C., Simpson R. T. Effects of sequence alterations in a DNA segment containing the 5 S RNA gene from Lytechinus variegatus on positioning of a nucleosome core particle in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1985 Dec 5;260(28):15318–15324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagerman P. J. Investigation of the flexibility of DNA using transient electric birefringence. Biopolymers. 1981 Jul;20(7):1503–1535. doi: 10.1002/bip.1981.360200710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jayasena S. D., Behe M. J. Competitive nucleosome reconstitution of polydeoxynucleotides containing oligoguanosine tracts. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jul 20;208(2):297–306. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90390-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McGhee J. D., Felsenfeld G. Nucleosome structure. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:1115–1156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.005343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ramsay N., Felsenfeld G., Rushton B. M., McGhee J. D. A 145-base pair DNA sequence that positions itself precisely and asymmetrically on the nucleosome core. EMBO J. 1984 Nov;3(11):2605–2611. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02181.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Satchwell S. C., Drew H. R., Travers A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 20;191(4):659–675. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7418–7422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 5;216(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Simon R. H., Felsenfeld G. A new procedure for purifying histone pairs H2A + H2B and H3 + H4 from chromatin using hydroxylapatite. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Feb;6(2):689–696. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.2.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Simpson R. T. Nucleosome positioning can affect the function of a cis-acting DNA element in vivo. Nature. 1990 Jan 25;343(6256):387–389. doi: 10.1038/343387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Simpson R. T., Stafford D. W. Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(1):51–55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simpson R. T., Whitlock J. P. Mapping DNAase l-susceptible sites in nucleosomes labeled at the 5' ends. Cell. 1976 Oct;9(2):347–353. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stacks P. C., Schumaker V. N. Nucleosome dissociation and transfer in concentrated salt solutions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Dec 20;7(8):2457–2467. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.8.2457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stein A. Unique positioning of reconstituted nucleosomes occurs in one region of simian virus 40 DNA. J Biol Chem. 1987 Mar 15;262(8):3872–3879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES