Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2006 Oct;12(10):1568–1571. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060320

Siberian Subtype Tickborne Encephalitis Virus, Finland

Anu E Jääskeläinen *,, Tapani Tikkakoski , Nathalie Y Uzcátegui *, Andrey N Alekseev , Antti Vaheri *,§, Olli Vapalahti *,§,
PMCID: PMC3290944  PMID: 17176574

Abstract

We isolated 11 Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) strains from Ixodes persulcatus ticks from a TBEV-endemic focus in the Kokkola Archipelago, western Finland. Thus I. persulcatus and the Siberian TBEV are reported in a focus considerably northwest of their previously known range in eastern Europe and Siberia.

Keywords: Tickborne encephalitis virus, Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes persulcatus, Siberian subtype TBEV, dispatch


Tickborne encephalitis (TBE) is a disease endemic in a zone extending from central and eastern Europe to Siberia and Japan. Three subtypes of the causative agent tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) are known: the European, Siberian, and Far Eastern (1,2). The main vector for the European subtype is Ixodes ricinus, and for the other 2 subtypes, I. persulcatus (1,35). I. ricinus is found in Europe and Middle East (6), and I. persulcatus ranges from eastern Europe to China and Japan. The boundary between their distribution lies at the Russian side of the Finnish-Russian border (1,7). The distribution areas of both tick species overlap in eastern Europe (4,5) (Figure 1). I. persulcatus has not been reported from northern or western Europe except for an engorged nymph on a willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus) in northeastern Sweden in May 1992 (6).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The known distribution of tickborne encephalitis (TBE)–virus endemic areas and Ixodes ticks in northern Europe. Yellow: TBE-endemic areas, adapted from International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis (8). To the south and west from the solid line, Ixodes ricinus distribution; to the east from the dashed line, I. persulcatus distribution; Lpr, Lappeenranta; EST, Estonia; LV, Latvia; LT, Lithuania.

In Finland, the TBE-endemic areas are mostly in the coastal regions: two thirds of cases come from the Åland Islands. Other TBE-endemic regions include the Archipelago of Turku, a focus in Isosaari (an island outside Helsinki), the Lappeenranta region in southeastern Finland, and the Archipelago of Kokkola in western Finland (9). The virus was found in the same areas (except for Isosaari) as early as the 1960s by screening antibodies to TBEV from cattle sera (10).

The TBE focus in the Archipelago of Kokkola (63°50´N, 23°10´E), ≈300 km south of the Arctic Circle, has a peculiar location; it is an isolated focus, far from other TBE-endemic areas, and is the northernmost TBE-endemic area known. Furthermore, the recent TBE cases have been severe with sequelae (11,12). A cluster of cases in 2002 led us to study ticks in the Kokkola Archipelago for TBEV.

The Study

A total of 1,181 ticks were collected by flagging in the Archipelago of Kokkola in June 2004 (Table 1). In the tick-collecting areas 1–7, TBE patients had reported tick bites, and in areas 8–10, no TBE cases have been found. All the locations were islands or peninsulas within 20 km of each other.

Table 1. Tick collection sites in Kokkola Archipelago, June 2004*.

Location TBE case-patient, sex/age/y No. ticks (n/f/m) No. tick pools Tick pools positive in RT-PCR† Tick pools positive in virus isolation†
1 M/48/2004 (12) 184 (19/87/78) 19 4, 8, 9 8, 9
2 M/21/2002 (11) 80 (24/25/31) 8 25, 26 25, 26
3 F/24/2002 (11) 158 (2/87/69) 16 39 39
4 F/12/2002 (11) 474 (16/227/231) 48 79, 81, 84, 85, 86, 102, 118 79, 81, 84, 86, 102, 118
5 F/73/2002 (11) 41 (2/22/17) 5 ND
6 M/6/2003 166 (6/83/77) 17 ND
7 M/7/2003 6 (0/3/3) 1 ND
8 No known cases 55 (1/25/29) 6 ND
9 No known cases 9 (2/5/2) 1 ND
10 No known cases 8 (0/6/2) 1 ND

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; n, nymphs; f, adult females; m, adult males; ND, not determined.
†Nos. indicate the tick pool numbers, the same as used in the phylogenetic tree.

The ticks were homogenized in pools of ≈10 with Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.2% bovine serum albumin (D-PBS-BSA) and sand to 122 pools. RNA was isolated from 100 μL of the pools by TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Espoo, Finland). The RNA was dissolved in 20 μL diethyl pyrocarbonate–treated water, and 10 μL was used for nested reverse transcription (RT)–PCR, amplifying a 252-nt sequence from the TBEV-NS5 gene to detect TBEV-RNA according to Puchhammer-Stöckl et al. (13), except that the outer forward primer used was 5´-ggaggctgaacaactgcac-3´. TBEV-RNA was detected in 13 pools (each consisted of 10 adult ticks) (Table 1). Assuming that only 1 tick in a positive pool was positive for TBEV RNA, the overall TBEV prevalence was 1.1%.

To isolate TBEV strains from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools, 20 μL of the supernatant of the pools diluted 1:1 in D-PBS-BSA was injected intracerebrally into suckling NMRI mice. One litter of suckling mice was used for each pool. The mice were followed for 14 days or until symptoms of illness appeared, and then they were killed. From 200 μL of the homogenized mouse brains, diluted 1:5 with D-PBS-BSA, RNA was extracted by TriPure, and RT-PCR for the partial TBEV-E gene was performed. The cDNA was produced with the reverse primer 5´-ccyccagccargagraagc-3´ by M-MuLV-RT enzyme (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), and subsequent PCR was performed with this and a forward primer 5´-aacagggaytttgtcactggyactc-3´ by Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) (detailed RT-PCR protocol available from the authors upon request).

A region of 205 nt from the NS5 gene from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools and 1,225-nt stretch from the E gene from the brains of the infected suckling mice were sequenced (GenBank accession nos. in Table 2). Unexpectedly, based on the partial NS5 sequences from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools (data not shown), the TBEV strains in Kokkola belonged to the Siberian subtype of TBEV. A phylogenetic tree based on the partial E gene sequences (1,076 nt) obtained from the TBEV isolates was prepared by the maximum likelihood method (Figure 2, scripts and datasets available from the authors upon request). Within the 1,076-nt stretch of the E gene, the Kokkola strains were >99.6% identical to each other. The closest relatives were Latvia-1-96 (97% identical) and the Estonian strains Est54, Est3535, and EK328 (95%–96%). Consequently, the Siberian subtype strains isolated from Finland and nearby Baltic states form a lineage together within the Siberian subtype. Other Siberian subtype strains Vasilchenko, Aina, Zausaev, and TBEV228 showed 92%–94% identity, and the European and Far Eastern subtypes showed 84%–86% identity. However, the vector tick species for Siberian-type TBEV, I. persulcatus, was not known to exist in Finland. This knowledge led us to study the tick species more carefully. DNA was isolated from 20 tick pools by TriPure and resuspended in 100 μL of TE (Tris-HCl 10 mmol/L, EDTA 1 mmol/L, pH ≈8). The tick species was determined as I. persulcatus by amplifying an average of 339 bp from mitochondrial 16S RNA gene by PCR and subsequent sequencing according to Caporale et al. (14). Because the ticks were pooled and homogenized before species identification, 30 adult ticks from the same region collected later in the summer were examined microscopically. All these specimens were I. persulcatus by morphologic criteria.

Table 2. TBE virus strains compared by sequence analysis*.

Strain Geographic origin GenBank accession no.
Kokkola 4 Location 1, Kokkola DQ451297
Kokkola 8 Location 1, Kokkola DQ451298,† DQ451286
Kokkola 9 Location 1, Kokkola DQ451299,† DQ451287
Kokkola 25 Location 2, Kokkola DQ451300,† ,DQ451288
Kokkola 26 Location 2, Kokkola DQ451301,† DQ451289
Kokkola 39 Location 3, Kokkola DQ451302,† DQ451290
Kokkola 79 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451303DQ451291
Kokkola 81 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451304,†DQ451292
Kokkola 84 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451305,†DQ451293
Kokkola 85 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451306
Kokkola 86 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451307,†DQ451294
Kokkola 102 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451308,†DQ451295
Kokkola 118 Location 4, Kokkola DQ451309,†DQ451296
Iso40 Isosaari, Finland AJ298323
Kumlinge A 52 Åland, Finland X60286
Est54 Estonia DQ393773
Est3535 Estonia DQ393774
Est2546 Estonia DQ393779
Est3476 Estonia DQ393776
Latvia 1–96 Latvia AJ415565
RK1424 Latvia AF091016
Neudoerfl Austria U27495
Hypr Czech Republic U39292
263 Czech Republic U27491
Zausaev Siberia, Russia AF527415
Vasilchenko Novosibirsk, Russia L40361
Aina Irkutsk, Russia AF091006
EK-328 Estonia DQ486861
TBEV228 Novosibirsk region, Russia DQ385498
TBEV1467 Novosibirsk region, Russia AY753582
Sofjin-HO Primorskii Kray, Russia AB062064
Oshima 5–10 Hokkaido, Japan AB062063
LIV United Kingdom NC 001809
OHFV, strain Bogoluvovska Russia AY193805
Langat Malaysia AF253419
Powassan, LB strain United States NC 003687

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; LIV, Louping ill virus; OHFV, Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus.
†Accession no. for the partial NS5 gene sequence.
‡Accession no. for the partial E gene sequence.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of partial E gene (1,076 nt). The bar below indicates the nucleotide substitutions per site. The accession nos. of the strains used can be seen in Table 2. The bootstrap support values <50 are not shown.

Conclusions

A TBE focus has existed in the Kokkola Archipelago at least since the 1960s when TBEV antibodies were detected in cattle (10), but the local TBE viruses have not been characterized. A cluster of severe human cases in the beginning of the 2000s prompted us to carry out the present study. In June 2004, we collected 1,181 ticks from the Archipelago of Kokkola and detected TBEV-RNA in 13 pools. Eleven were also positive in virus isolation. The sequences showed that the strains belonged to the Siberian subtype, whereas in the other Finnish TBE-endemic foci, only European subtype TBEV closely related to the central European strains has previously been detected (15). Furthermore, the tick species was I. persulcatus. Our results show that both I. persulcatus and the Siberian type TBEV are occurring several hundreds of kilometers further to northwest than what has been known previously. Because the 2 tick species are similar to the naked eye and in their behavior, and published data on distribution of Ixodes ticks in Finland are sparse and outdated, we cannot exclude the possibility that I. persulcatus also exists unnoticed elsewhere in Finland. More tick surveys and epidemiologic studies are needed to map the distribution areas of the 2 vector species and of the different TBEV subtypes in Finland. However, in our recent tick collections from Åland and southern (Isosaari, 60°N, 25°E) and eastern (Lappeenranta, 61°N, 28°E, and Joensuu, 62°N, 29°E) Finland, all ticks were I. ricinus.

Some researchers have found indications that the Siberian TBEV might cause more severe or more persistent forms of TBE than the European subtype (4), and 3 of 5 recent human TBE cases in Kokkola have been severe (11,12). However, the number of cases studied from Kokkola is too small for firm conclusions on the severity of the local disease.

Acknowledgments

We thank all who participated in the tick collecting in Kokkola Archipelago in June 2004: Anna Katz, Tytti Manni, Niina Putkuri, Auli Saarinen, Pirjo Sarjakivi, Elina Tikkakoski, and Mikko Tikkakoski. We also thank Simo Räisänen for delivering more tick material from the region; Pirjo Sarjakivi and Tytti Manni for excellent technical assistance; and Lorenza Beati, Thomas G.T. Jaenson, and Juhani Terhivuo for help in studying the morphology of ticks.

The Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School provided half of A. Jääskeläinen's salary since the beginning of January 2005, and the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation provided other financial support from grant nos. 2343/31/05 and 1696/31/04. Baxter Oy provided financial support for the tick safari to Kokkola.

Biography

Ms Jääskeläinen is a PhD candidate at Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School and conducts research in the Department of Virology, University of Helsinki. Besides the molecular epidemiology of tickborne encephalitis virus, her interests include developing recombinant antigens for flavivirus diagnostics.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Jääskeläinen AE, Tikkakoski T, Uzcátegui NY, Alekseev AN, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O. Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 Oct [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1210.060320

References

  • 1.Ecker M, Allison SL, Meixner T, Heinz FX. Sequence analysis and genetic classification of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Europe and Asia. J Gen Virol. 1999;80:179–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hayasaka D, Ivanov L, Leonova GN, Goto A, Yoshii K, Mizutani T, et al. Distribution and characterization of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Siberia and far-eastern Asia. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:1319–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lundkvist K, Vene S, Golovljova I, Mavtchoutko V, Forsgren M, Kalnina V, et al. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Latvia: evidence for co-circulation of three distinct subtypes. J Med Virol. 2001;65:730–5. 10.1002/jmv.2097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Charrel RN, Attoui H, Butenko AM, Clegg JC, Deubel V, Frolova TV, et al. Tick-borne virus diseases of human interest in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:1040–55. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01022.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Golovljova I, Vene S, Sjolander KB, Vasilenko V, Plyusnin A, Lundkvist Å. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Estonia. J Med Virol. 2004;74:580–8. 10.1002/jmv.20224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jaenson TG, Talleklint L, Lundqvist L, Olsen B, Chirico J, Mejlon H. Geographical distribution, host associations, and vector roles of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae) in Sweden. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:240–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Öhman C. The geographical and topographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus in Finland. Acta Societatis Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica. 1961;76:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis. 2006. Jan 11 [cited 2006 Mar 14]. Available from http://www.tbe-info.com/tbe.aspx
  • 9.Wahlberg P, Saikku P, Brummer-Korvenkontio M. Tick-borne viral encephalitis in Finland. The clinical features of Kumlinge disease during 1959–1987. J Intern Med. 1989;225:173–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1989.tb00059.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tuomi J, Brummer-Korvenkontio M. Antibodies against viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis group in cattle sera in Finland. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1965;43:149–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marjelund S, Tikkakoski T, Tuisku S, Räisänen S. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and outcome in severe tick-borne encephalitis. Report of four cases and review of the literature. Radiol. 2004;45:88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marjelund S, Jääskeläinen A, Tikkakoski T, Tuisku S, Vapalahti O. Gadolinium enhancement of the cauda equina—a new MR imaging finding in a myeloradiculitic form of tick-borne encephalitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:995–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Puchhammer-Stöckl E, Kunz C, Mandl CW, Heinz FX. Identification of tick-borne encephalitis virus ribonucleic acid in tick suspensions and in clinical specimens by a reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction assay. Clin Diagn Virol. 1995;4:321–6. 10.1016/0928-0197(95)00022-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caporale DA, Rich SM, Spielman A, Telford SR III, Kocher TD. Discriminating between Ixodes ticks by means of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995;4:361–5. 10.1006/mpev.1995.1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han X, Aho M, Vene S, Peltomaa M, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O. Prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Finland. J Med Virol. 2001;64:21–8. 10.1002/jmv.1012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES