Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2012 Mar 1;7(3):e32278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032278

Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of 1698 Yeast Reference Strains Revealing Potential Emerging Human Pathogens

Marie Desnos-Ollivier 1,2, Vincent Robert 3, Dorothée Raoux-Barbot 1,2, Marizeth Groenewald 3, Françoise Dromer 1,2,*
Editor: Matthew (Mat) Charles Fisher4
PMCID: PMC3291558  PMID: 22396754

Abstract

New molecular identification techniques and the increased number of patients with various immune defects or underlying conditions lead to the emergence and/or the description of novel species of human and animal fungal opportunistic pathogens. Antifungal susceptibility provides important information for ecological, epidemiological and therapeutic issues. The aim of this study was to assess the potential risk of the various species based on their antifungal drug resistance, keeping in mind the methodological limitations. Antifungal susceptibility profiles to the five classes of antifungal drugs (polyens, azoles, echinocandins, allylamines and antimetabolites) were determined for 1698 yeast reference strains belonging to 992 species (634 Ascomycetes and 358 Basidiomycetes). Interestingly, geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antifungal drugs tested were significantly higher for Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes (p<0.001). Twenty four strains belonging to 23 species of which 19 were Basidiomycetes seem to be intrinsically “resistant” to all drugs. Comparison of the antifungal susceptibility profiles of the 4240 clinical isolates and the 315 reference strains belonging to 53 shared species showed similar results. Even in the absence of demonstrated in vitro/in vivo correlation, knowing the in vitro susceptibility to systemic antifungal agents and the putative intrinsic resistance of yeast species present in the environment is important because they could become opportunistic pathogens.

Introduction

Among the estimated 1.5 million fungal species, approximately 200 species of yeasts and moulds associated with humans as commensals or pathogens are reported, according to the Colloquium of the American Academy of Microbiology on the fungal Kingdom (The Fungal Kingdom: Diverse and Essential Roles in Earth's Ecosystem, June 2008, ASM http://academy.asm.org/). The number of yeasts species has increased over time. In 1928, Guillermond described only 22 genera of yeasts, and the successive editions of one textbook on yeasts included 349 species belonging to 39 genera in 1970 [1], more than 700 species belonging to 100 different genera in 1998 [2], and 11 new genera since 2003 [3], [4]. In the fifth edition of the reference yeast book published by Kurtzman et al. [5], 149 genera and nearly 1500 species are described. Furthermore, new yeast species are regularly recognized as opportunistic pathogens. This can be explained by an increased awareness of invasive fungal infections and by improved techniques that allow better identification of fungal species based on polygenic analyses. There is also an increasing number of patients with various immune defects (haematological malignancies, solid tumours, organ transplantation, immunosuppressive treatments, etc.) or underlying conditions (intensive care unit, indwelling catheter, prosthetic devices, broad spectrum antibiotics, etc.). This complex setting often prompts use of pre-emptive, prophylactic and prolonged curative antifungal treatments that can favour the emergence of resistant species or mutations in the drug target [6]. The azoles are to our knowledge the only class compounds used both in agriculture and in clinical medicine. They block the biosynthesis of fungal ergosterol by inhibition of cytochrome P450 14-alpha demethylase. Derivatives of piperazines, pyridines and pyrimidines are also used as fungicides for plant protection and have a mode of action similar to that of azoles [7].

Knowledge about the yeasts antifungal susceptibility profiles is limited to species responsible for human infections. During this study a comprehensive analysis of antifungal susceptibility profiles of a large number of yeast type strains available at the reference collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS, Utrecht, The Netherlands) were undertaken. Human pathogenic species as well as species recovered from other sources (e.g. environment, food and insects) were included in this study. Antifungal drugs tested belonged to the five known classes of antifungal drugs (polyenes, azoles, echinocandins, allylamines and antimetabolites). The aim of this study was to look into the possibility whether species with decreased susceptibility to one or several classes of antifungal drugs could be a threat for human or animal health taking also into account their ability to grow at 37°C. We also used our database of 4240 isolates recovered mainly from clinical specimens and collected at the French National Reference Center (NRCMA) to compare the antifungal susceptibility of the 53 species shared among the CBS reference strains and the clinical isolates.

Results

Differences in antifungal susceptibility profiles between Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes in the CBS and the National Reference Center for Mycoses and Antifungals (NRCMA) collections

A total of 1698 yeast reference strains and 4240 clinical isolates were studied (Table 1). Table 2 summarizes the antifungal susceptibility results according to the division for all the reference strains and the clinical isolates. For the reference strains, geometric mean minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antifungal drugs tested were significantly higher for Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes (p<0.001, Table 2). Thus, using the previously defined thresholds, the percentage of reference strains with resistance or decreased susceptibility to drugs was significantly higher for Basidiomycetes than for Ascomycetes (Table 3). Almost half the Basidiomycetes strains could be considered as “resistant” for flucytosine (5FC) and amphotericin B (AmB) and even more than half for fluconazole (FCZ), voriconazole (VRZ), and caspofungin (Caspo). For the Ascomycetes, less than 20% of the reference strains were considered resistant except for FCZ (38.3%). There was no visible alteration in antifungal susceptibility profiles over time for either Basidiomycetes or Ascomycetes (data not shown). If we arbitrarily define “resistance” for a given class of antifungal drug by ≥50% of the strains with decreased susceptibility to that drug, provided that at least five strains were tested, 16 of the 38 genera of reference strains of Ascomycetes tested were “resistant” to at least one class (13 being resistant to azoles), five genera to two classes (two to azoles/5FC, and one each to azoles/echinocandin, azoles/polyenes and azoles/allylamines), and one genus, Yarrowia, that has already been described to be a human opportunistic pathogen, to four classes (Table S1). For the Basidiomycetes, all strains representatives of the 19 genera were “resistant” to echinocandins, none was resistant to allylamine; Fellomyces and Hannaella, that are unknown as human pathogens, were “resistant” to four classes and the strains tested belonging to the 11 genera including the known opportunistic pathogens Trichosporon, Cryptococcus, Pseudozyma and Rhodosporidium were resistant to three classes (Table S2).

Table 1. Description of the reference strains and the clinical isolates studied.

Reference strains Clinical isolates
Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes Total Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes Total
Number of
strains 1209 489 1698 3557 683 4240
genera 71 48 119 19 5 23
No. of strains per genus 1–385 1–90
No. of species per genus 1–257 1–70
species 634 358 993 43 10 53
No. of strains per species 1–30 1–29
Site of isolation or substrate
Human 125 52 177 3489 679 4168
Living organisms 503 246 749 3 3 6
Water 24 29 53
Environment 185 101 286 6 0 6
Food & industrial products 292 19 311
unknown 80 42 122 59 1 60
Geograpical area * 994 419 1413
Europe 354 124 478 3493 630 4123
Africa 103 18 121 8 6 14
North America 171 27 198
South America 138 26 164 55 47 102
Asia 195 177 372
Oceania 27 21 48 1 0 1
Antartica 6 26 32
Period of isolation * 1193 481 1674
1905–1958 490 109 599
1959–1972 262 84 346
1973–1990 184 101 285
1991–1995 24 24 48
1996–2000 89 41 130
2001–2009 144 122 266 3557 683 4240
*

when information is available.

Table 2. Distribution of MICs according to the phylum of clinical isolates and reference strains.

Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes
No. isolates GeometricMean MIC50/MIC90 (µg/mL) Range (µg/mL) No. isolates GeometricMean MIC50/MIC90 (µg/mL) Range (µg/mL)
Type strains
Fluconazole 1147 3.38 4/32 0.12–128 445 14.24 16/128 0.12–128
Voriconazole 1147 0.06 0.06/0.5 0.015–16 445 0.24 0.25/4 0.015–16
Itraconazole 1147 0.08 0.06/0.05 0.015–16 445 0.20 0.12/16 0.015–16
Posaconazole 1147 0.10 0.12/0.5 0.015–16 445 0.22 0.25/2 0.015–16
Flucytosine 1147 0.26 0.12/2 0.12–128 445 4.82 4/128 0.12–128
Terbinafine 1147 0.84 1/8 0.015–16 445 1.30 2/8 0.015–16
Caspofungin 1202 0.09 0.06/0.5 0.015–16 484 4.36 8/16 0.015–16
Amphotericin B 1202 0.06 0.06/0.25 0.015–16 484 0.15 0.12/0.5 0.015–16
Clinical isolates
Fluconazole 3550 0.98 0.5/32 0.12–128 683 3.90 4/16 0.12–128
Voriconazole 3550 0.04 0.015/0.5 0.015–16 683 0.05 0.06/0.12 0.015–16
Itraconazole 2206 0.07 0.03/1 0.015–16 427 0.06 0.06/0.25 0.015–4
Posaconazole 3547 0.07 0.06/1 0.015–16 683 0.10 0.12/0.25 0.015–16
Flucytosine 3550 0.24 0.12/1 0.12–128 683 4.17 4/16 0.12–128
Terbinafine 2157 1.27 2/8 0.015–16 420 0.73 1/2 0.03–16
Caspofungin 2998 0.06 0.06/0.25 0.015–8 548 3.9 8/8 0.12–8
Amphotericin B 3556 0.08 0.06/0.25 0.015–4 682 0.18 0.12/0.5 0.015–16

Table 3. Proportion of reference strains with high MIC.

N° of isolates with high MIC* to the corresponding antifungal (%) Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes p
Fluconazole ≥8 µg/mL 439/1147 (38.3) 302/445 (67.9) <0.001
Voriconazole ≥0.25 µg/mL 236/1147 (20.6) 231/445 (51.9) <0.001
Itraconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL 161/1147 (14.0) 144/445 (32.4) <0.001
Posaconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL 155/1147 (13.5) 149/445 (33.5) <0.001
Flucytosine ≥8 µg/mL 78/1147 (6.8) 219/445 (49.2) <0.001
Terbinafine ≥8 µg/mL 143/1147 (12.5) 80/445 (18.0) 0.006
Caspofungin ≥0.5 µg/mL 154/1202 (12.8) 445/484 (91.9) <0.001
Amphotericin B ≥0.25 µg/mL 168/1202 (14.0) 214/484 (44.2) <0.001
Amphotericin B ≥1 µg/mL 25/1202 (2.1) 44/484 (9.1) <0.001
*

Minimal inhibitory concentration.

For the clinical isolates, significant differences in geometric mean MICs were recorded for all drugs between Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes except for itraconazole (ITZ, not significantly different) and terbinafine (Terbi, MICs were higher in Ascomycetes compared to Basidiomycetes, p<0.001) (Table 2).

Comparison of antifungal susceptibility profiles for the species shared between the collections of CBS reference strains and NRCMA clinical isolates

The MICs for the 53 different species corresponding to the 4240 clinical isolates collected at the NRCMA were analysed and compared to those obtained for the corresponding 315 reference strains (Table 4, Tables S1 and S2). When analysing data for each species (Tables S3 and S4), the overall distribution of the MICs (MIC50, MIC90 and MIC ranges) was similar between reference strains and clinical isolates.

Table 4. Comparison of reference strains and clinical isolates with high MIC.

Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes
No. isolates with MIC* to the corresponding antifungal type strains % clinical isolates % p type strains % clinical isolates % p
Fluconazole ≥8 µg/mL 87/258 33.7 848/3550 23.9 0.001 41/55 74.6 236/683 34.6 <0.001
Voriconazole ≥0.25 µg/mL 48/258 18.6 693/3550 19.5 0.745 41/55 74.6 48/683 7.0 <0.001
Itraconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL 42/258 16.3 447/2206 20.3 <0.001 37/55 76.3 22/427 5.2 <0.001
Posaconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL 46/258 17.8 624/3547 17.6 0.933 34/55 61.8 59/683 8.6 <0.001
Flucytosine ≥8 µg/mL 15/258 5.8 184/3550 5.2 0.775 11/55 20 249/683 36.5 0.013
Terbinafine ≥8 µg/mL 42/258 16.3 313/2157 14.5 0.457 24/55 43.6 10/420 2.4 <0.001
Caspofungin ≥0.5 µg/mL 18/259 7 277/2898 9.6 0.182 53/56 94.6 546/548 99.6 0.007
Amphotericin B ≥0.25 µg/mL 53/259 20.5 399/3556 11.2 <0.001 20/56 35.7 337/682 49.4 0.052
*

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.

Among the Ascomycetes, the proportion of decreased susceptibility to antifungals was similar between the reference strains and the clinical isolates for VRZ, posaconazole (PSZ), 5FC, Terbi, and Caspo. A significant but less than 2-fold difference was observed for FCZ and ITZ. The proportion of AmB resistance for reference strains was almost 2-fold more than that recorded for clinical isolates (Table 4). One Yarrowia lipolytica reference strain and two clinical isolates of Candida glabrata and Candida krusei, were resistant to all five classes of antifungal drugs. Major discrepancies were observed for Candida tropicalis with MIC50 and MIC90 of the azoles higher for the reference strains than for the clinical isolates where seven from the12 reference strains were resistant to at least one azole, including six recovered before 1970 and four from human samples. None of the C. tropicalis reference strains had 5FC MIC>8 µg/ml in contrast with almost 33% (103/313) of the clinical isolates. Some discrepancies in Caspo MICs distribution were also noted with a few clinical isolates of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida rugosa, Candida tropicalis, Clavispora lusitaniae and Kodamaea ohmeri that exhibited high MICs. Most of these isolates have been recovered from patients previously exposed to echinocandins.

Among the Basidiomycetes the percentage of strains with resistance or decreased susceptibility was drastically higher among reference strains than among clinical isolates for azoles and Terbi, and lower for 5FC and AmB. Of the 604 Basidiomycetes tested (548 clinical isolates and 56 reference strains), only two Cryptococcus neoformans, one Cryptococcus gattii, one Cryptococcus laurentii and one Trichosporon inkin had low Caspo MICs, leaving 99% of the Basidiomycetes resistant to Caspo.

Relationship between thermotolerance, source of isolation and antifungal drugs susceptibility profile

Among the 1470 reference strains for which the maximum temperature of growth was determined, 535 (36.4%) were known to grow at 37°C or above, including 488 Ascomycetes (48 genera and 227 species) and 47 Basidiomycetes (8 genera and 26 species). Therefore, the proportion of strains able to grow at 37°C varied according to the Division (46.3% for the Ascomycetes and 11.3% for the Basidiomycetes) and also according to their source of isolation (from 61.6% for strains of human source to 16.7% for those from soil, Table 5) with no Basidiomycetes that were recovered from insects were able to grow at 37°C. Among the 535 thermotolerant strains, 271 (50.7%; i.e. 256 Ascomycetes strains belonging to 177 species in 45 genera; 15 Basidiomycetes strains belonging to 15 species in eight genera) belonged to species unknown as human pathogens, or at least not described in articles available in the NCBI library (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The proportion of strains with decreased susceptibility to the various antifungal drugs varied according to the source of isolation (humans, other living organisms, food and industrial products, environment and water): azoles (39±14%), 5FC (11±8%), Terbi (13±4%), Caspo (23±12%) and AmB (20±8%) (Table 5). Strains recovered from insects had the lowest proportion of “resistance” compared to other sources for all antifungals except 5FC (data not shown). The highest proportion of “resistance” was observed for strains recovered from drinks (alcoholic beverages, fruit juices, soft drinks) (with regards to azoles and Terbi resistance), from humans (5FC), environment and animals (Caspo) and animals (AmB).

Table 5. Reference strains able to grow at 37°C with high MIC according to source of isolation.

Percent of strains with decreased susceptibility to
Source of isolation No. strains able to grow at 37°C/No. strains No. Strains Tested in RPMI Fluco Vori Itra Posa 5FC Terbi No. Strains Tested in AM3 Caspo AmB
Human 109/177 109 28% 20% 12% 10% 16% 11% 109 21% 17%
Living organisms 188/749 183 32% 20% 13% 11% 9% 9% 188 15% 17%
Environment 58/286 56 45% 21% 18% 16% 5% 16% 58 17% 17%
Water 9/53 9 0% 11% 11% 0% 22% 11% 9 44% 33%
Food & Industrial products 140/311 130 50% 25% 23% 25% 4% 19% 140 16% 19%
All (mean ± SD) 504/1556 487 31±20 19±5 15±5 12±9 11±8 13±4 504 23±12 20±8

When analysing all the reference strains regardless of the thermotolerance, 24 strains (i.e. 1.5% of the 1580 strains tested against all antifungal drugs), belonging to 23 different species and including 19 Basidiomycetes, were resistant to all drugs. The reported sources were six strains from the environment, five from soil, six from plants and one from animal and human. Among the 23 species, two were recognized human opportunistic pathogens (Cryptococcus albidus and Y. lipolytica), and three were recovered from clinical specimens (Cryptococcus magnus, Bulleromyces albus (CBS database) and Pseudozyma hubeiensis (NRCMA unpublished data)). Among the four Ascomycetes isolates resistant to all antifungal drugs, three were included or related to the Y. lipolytica clade (Y. lipolytica, Candida hispaniensis and Candida umkomasiana). Among these 24 “resistant” strains, 17 were able to grow at 30°C and only seven at 37°C. Finally, among the seven resistant species able to grow at 37°C, five were unknown as human pathogen (two Ascomycetes, C. hispaniensis and Zygosaccharomyces mellis; three Basidiomycetes, Pseudozyma crassa, Trichosporon lactis and Trichosporon veenhuisii).

Discussion

The limitations of the present study should be kept in mind. Firstly, antifungal susceptibility testing was not performed for all strains in identical conditions because of changes in incubation parameters requested by temperature requirements and slow growth rate in the test media for some species. This implies also that not all reference strains of a given genus and/or only a few strains for a given species were available for analysis. Secondly, storage of the reference strains was uneven considering time period, geographical zone and source of isolation, thus preventing definitive conclusions regarding evolution of drug resistance over time or according to substrates. Furthermore, the proportion of Ascomycetes versus Basidiomycetes from the various substrates for the reference strains does not reflect the reality in terms of overall species' diversity, colonization, saprophitism or pathogenicity. Finally, future changes in taxonomy may alter some of our conclusions that are based on our current knowledge on specific genera or species.

The first striking result of this study was the higher proportion of strains with decreased susceptibility, regardless of the class of antifungal drugs used, among Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes reference strains. The drastic difference observed for echinocandins (92% Basidiomycetes and 13% Ascomycetes reference strains with Caspo MIC≥0.5 µg/ml) is well known for pathogenic species, and was confirmed by comparison with the clinical isolates. Caspofungin is one of the three antifungal agents in the class of echinocandins. The target of the echinocandins is the synthetic cell-wall enzyme complex beta-1,3D-glucansynthase [8]. Filobasidiella neoformans had a hotspot region in beta-1,3D-glucansynthase similar to that of the susceptible Ascomycetes species C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae but is intrinsically resistant to echinocandins. A previous study has already shown the presence of fks1-like genes in ten species of Basidiomycetes with sequences remarkably similar to Fks1 from F. neoformans [9]. This difference in echinocandins susceptibility between Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes could be the result of phylogenetic differentiation of the cell-wall composition with potential modification of the three-dimensional structure of the betaglucan synthase complex that remains to be analyzed.

Almost all (84%) of the genera of Basidiomycetes included more than 50% of reference strains with decreased susceptibility to azoles compared to 34% of the genera of Ascomycetes. Most (68%) genera of Basidiomycetes included more than 50% of the reference strains with decreased susceptibility to at least three classes compared to the Ascomycetes genera (3%). The fact that the resistance profiles of the reference strains were not associated with a specific substrate or period corresponding to specific drug launching time suggest that it may not have been acquired through environmental pressure but rather through recombination or other evolutionary processes. A comprehensive analysis of the target genes is necessary to validate this hypothesis.

The comparison of the antifungal susceptibility profiles of the reference strains with the clinical isolates belonging to shared species showed that the profiles were similar except for a few species. Indeed, some Candida spp. clinical isolates with high Caspo MIC were recovered from patients previously exposed to Caspo (acquisition of resistance by nonsense mutation in hotspot regions of the betaglucan synthase [10], [11], [12], [13]), whereas reference strains of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. rugosa, C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae and K. ohmeri recovered before Caspo usage had low MICs. None of the C. tropicalis type strains had 5FC MIC>8 µg/ml in contrast with almost 33% of the clinical isolates. It was previously showed that most of these clinical isolates belong to a single 5FC-resistant clone [14]. The widespread use of antifungal drugs especially azoles since the 1970s in agriculture (http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/rags.asp?id=644) may also contribute to the emergence of resistance. The drugs are used repeatedly over a long period of time and could thereby create a persistent pressure of azole compounds on saprophytic fungi [15]. Indeed, resistance of clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. to azoles has been shown to occur in patients treated with voriconazole but also following environmental exposure of the infecting isolates [13], [16]. However, there is no obvious explanation for the high proportion of C. tropicalis reference strains with high azoles MICs compared to very few clinical isolates since only three were recovered after 1970. However, the overall similarity of the results between reference strains and clinical isolates, suggests that the results obtained with the other reference strains could be valid.

Robert and Casadevall suggested in their study of fungal thermotolerance that “new human pathogenic fungi are likely to emerge from genera that are already tolerant to higher temperatures” [17]. Among the 1698 reference strains studied, 535 strains from 253 species were able to grow at human body temperature, among which several species (177/634 Ascomycetes species and 15/358 Basidiomycetes species) were unknown as human opportunistic pathogens. Keeping in mind that growth limitation evidenced in vitro could be related to culture medium or conditions and could not apply in vivo, it was found that five of the seven species were resistant to all antifungal classes and able to grow at 37°C were unknown as human pathogen. Even though the in vitro/in vivo correlation was not demonstrated, knowing the in vitro susceptibility to systemic antifungal agents and the putative intrinsic resistance of these thermotolerant species is important as they could become opportunistic human pathogens. As an example, the species Y. lipolytica has been studied for its biotechnological importance [18] but is also known to be responsible for human invasive infections mainly in immunocompromised patients. Interestingly, among the six species belonging to the Y. lipolytica clade [19], the two species Y. lipolytica and C. hispaniensis, both able to grow at 37°C, include two reference strains with high MICs for all antifungals. Candida hispaniensis, described in 2005, is still unknown as human or animal opportunist. Furthermore, among the Y. lipolytica clade, Candida bentonensis, able to grow at 35°C, had high MICs for all antifungals except 5FC. Candida galli, previously described in chicken infections, and unable to grow above 35°C, had high MICs for 5FC, Fluco, Vori and AmB. The other species of the clade, Candida uncommunis and Aciculoconidium aculeatum were unable to grow above 35°C and 30°C respectively and had high MICs for AmB. Of note, the isolate of the species C. umkomasiana, previously identified as Y. lipolytica was also resistant to all antifungal drugs. The genomic study of species present in the Y. lipolytica clade and of additional closely related species could therefore be particularly interesting in terms of multidrug resistance.

In conclusion, this study provides the first comprehensive analysis of antifungal susceptibility profiles for almost 1700 reference strains representing more than 119 genera and 993 species. It paves the way to further phylogenetic studies on the origin of drug resistance and evolution in Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes. It also shows that species with high levels of resistance can be found in the environment without previous environment drug pressure and could become opportunistic human pathogens. Finally, it underlines how important correct identification of species is, especially for uncommon species, pointing out the need for reliable fungal sequence databases [20].

Materials and Methods

Yeasts Type Strains

A total of 1698 yeast reference strains available from the CBS collection, that include type strains (T), authentic strains (AUT), syntypes (ST), lectotypes (LT), IT (isotype), AT (allotype) or neotypes (NT) of currently accepted species and also from previously described species that are now considered to be synonyms of the accepted species, were studied. The strains belonged to the Division of Ascomycota (71.2%, 71 genera, 634 species) and Basidiomycota (28.8%, 48 genera, 358 species) (Table 1). Strains were recovered from various sources, such as plants (27.7%), soil (12.4%), drinks (10.7%), insects (10.6%) and humans (10.4%) (Table 1). The geographical areas of isolation were diverse, but most strains were isolated from Europe (33.8%) and Asia (26.3%) for the 1413 isolates for which the information was available. The oldest isolate was found in 1905, but 43.5% of the strains were recovered since 1973 and 15.9% since 2001.

All strains were stored in lyophilised form at the CBS. They were subcultured at least twice on Sabouraud agar plates (Gibco®, Invitrogen™, Life Technologies, CA, USA) before in vitro susceptibility testing.

Clinical isolates

The NRCMA received clinical isolates from short-stay university hospital laboratories. These isolates are part of surveillance programs or send to the NRCMA due to difficulties during the identification process. The isolates corresponding to species for which a reference strain was available were included in the analysis (n = 4240) (Table 1). They belonged to the Ascomycota (83.9%, 19 genera and 43 species) and Basidiomycota (16.1%, five genera, ten species). Five species encompass 86.3% of the clinical isolates (Candida albicans (40.9%), Cryptococcus neoformans (14.9%), Candida glabrata (14.5%), Candida parapsilosis (8.6%) and Candida tropicalis (7.4%)). Isolates were mainly recovered from humans (83.7%) in Europe (84.7%) and all between January 2003 and July 2010.

Upon receipt, all isolates were identified by phenotypic methods (urease activity, Urea-Indole, bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France; carbon assimilation profiles, ID32C, bioMérieux), and by sequencing of the ITS and D1/D2 regions of the gene coding for ribosomal RNA by using universal primers (V9D/LS266 and NL1/NL4 primers, respectively [21], [22], [23], [24]). Candida albicans was differentiated from Candida dubliniensis by amplification of a portion of the gene coding for actin [25]. MICs of various systemic antifungal drugs (see below) were determined on a routine basis for each isolate.

In vitro susceptibility testing

In vitro susceptibility was determined by a microdilution technique following the procedure proposed by the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of EUCAST (AFST-EUCAST [26]) with modifications of the temperatures and duration of incubation when necessary.

Active powder of known potency of flucytosine (5FC, Sigma, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France), fluconazole (FCZ, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA), itraconazole (ITZ, Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France), voriconazole (VRZ, Pfizer), posaconazole (PSZ, Merck and Co., Rahway, New Jersey, USA), terbinafin (Terbi, Novartis Pharma AF, Basel, Schwitzerland), caspofungin (Caspo, Merck) and amphotericin B (AmB, Sigma Chemicals) were used. Stock solutions were prepared in sterile distilled water (5FC, FCZ, Caspo, Terbi) or DMSO (AmB, ITZ, VRZ, PSZ) and stored at −80°C until used. Stock solutions were diluted in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS, Sigma) for all antifungals except Caspo and AmB that were diluted in AM3 medium (Difco™, Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France). Final concentrations ranged from 0.125 to 64 µg/ml (5FC and FCZ) and from 0.015 to 8 µg/ml (for the others). Both media were supplemented with glucose (final concentration 2%). Microplates (96 wells flat-bottom, TPP®, Switzerland) were prepared by batches and stored frozen at −20°C for less than 6 months. The following reference strains were included as quality controls: C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Pichia kudriavzevii (synonym of Issatchenkia orientalis, teleomorph of Candida krusei [27]) ATCC6258. Fungal growth was determined by an automated microplate reader spectrophotometer (Multiscan RC-351, Labsystems Oy, Helsinki, Finland) at 492 nm after at least 24 h of incubation and/or until absorbance of the drug-free well was ≥0.2. The MIC was defined as a 50% (90% for amphotericin B) or more reduction in growth compared to the drug-free well.

For the reference strains, a few parameters had to be changed because the procedure is standardized for glucose fermentative yeasts able to grow at 35°C. Thus, growth temperature for the subculture and subsequent incubation of the microplates was changed for the majority of the strains (30°C, 20°C and 15°C for 1503, 158, and 17 strains, respectively). Incubation time varied, 24 hrs for 713 (42%), 48 hrs for 466 (27%), 72 hrs for 232 (14%), 4 days for 145 (8.5%), 6 days for 121 (7%), 7 days for 21 (1%) strains. Likewise, the test medium did not allow sufficient growth and thus determination of the MIC for some strains was limited to azoles, 5FC and Terbi or Caspo and AmB (106 missing values for drugs tested in RPMI and 12 for drugs tested in AM3).

Resistance to FCZ and VRZ were defined as a MIC higher than or equal to 8 and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively according to EUCAST recommendations [26]. Decreased susceptibility to 5FC and Caspo were arbitrarily defined by a MIC higher than or equal to 8 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively according to previous data obtained in the laboratory showing that clinical isolates of Candida spp. exhibiting MICs above these thresholds harboured mutations in target genes [28], [29]. We defined arbitrary thresholds for ITZ, PSZ, AmB and Terbi by determining the MIC that inhibited at least 90% of the clinical isolates. This corresponded to a MIC higher than or equal to 0.5 µg/mL for ITZ and PSZ, ≥0.25 µg/mL for AmB and ≥8 µg/mL for Terbi. The values corresponding to the concentration inhibiting 50% (MIC50) or 90% (MIC90) of the strains were calculated for species including more than ten strains.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata™ (version 10.1, College Station, TX, USA). Distribution of MICs between Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes were compared using the non-parametric Kruskall Wallis test. Comparisons between groups were done using Chi Square or Fisher exact tests for the proportions of strains/isolates with decreased susceptibility to a drug. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Percentage of isolates with high MIC within genera in the Ascomycota phylum.

(XLS)

Table S2

Percentage of “resistant” isolates within genera in the Division Basidiomycota.

(XLS)

Table S3

Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for azoles.

(XLS)

Table S4

Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for Amphotericine B, Flucytosine, Terbinafine and Caspofungine.

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Damien Hoinard (NRCMA) and Wendy Epping (CBS) for technical help. Thanks to Dea Garcia-Hermoso and Stéphane Bretagne for proofreading. Thanks to Jack Edwards and Marc Orbach for their helpful information about use of antifungal in agricultures.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the Institut Pasteur. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lodder J. The Yeasts, A taxonomic study. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurtzman CP, Fell JW. The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurtzman CP. Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;4:233–245. doi: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00175-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kurtzman CP, Suzuki M. Phylogenetic analysis of ascomycete yeasts that form coenzyme Q-9 and the proposal of the new genera Babjeviella, Meyerozyma, Millerozyma, Priceomyces and Scheffersomyces. Mycoscience. 2010;51:2–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The Yeasts, A taxonomic study. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lortholary O, Desnos-Ollivier M, Sitbon K, Fontanet A, Bretagne S, et al. Recent exposure to caspofungin or fluconazole influences the epidemiology of candidemia: a prospective multicenter study involving 2,441 patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:532–538. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01128-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ji H, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Zhu J, et al. A three-dimensional model of lanosterol 14alpha-demethylase of Candida albicans and its interaction with azole antifungals. J Med Chem. 2000;43:2493–2505. doi: 10.1021/jm990589g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Denning DW. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet. 2003;362:1142–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reverberi M, Di Mario F, Tomati U. beta-Glucan synthase induction in mushrooms grown on olive mill wastewaters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;66:217–225. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1662-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baixench MT, Aoun N, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Bretagne S, et al. Acquired resistance to echinocandins in Candida albicans: case report and review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:1076–1083. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dannaoui E, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Grenouillet F, Cassaing S, et al. Infections due to Candida spp. with acquired echinocandin-resistance emerge in France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 doi: 10.3201/eid1801.110556. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kahn JN, Garcia-Effron G, Hsu MJ, Park S, Marr KA, et al. Acquired echinocandin resistance in a Candida krusei isolate due to modification of glucan synthase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1876–1878. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00067-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Snelders E, van der Lee HA, Kuijpers J, Rijs AJ, Varga J, et al. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Bernede C, Robert V, Raoux D, et al. Clonal population of flucytosine-resistant Candida tropicalis from blood cultures, Paris, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:557–565. doi: 10.3201/eid1404.071083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verweij PE, Snelders E, Kema GHJ, Mellado E, Melchers WJG. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-eff ect of environmental fungicide use? Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:789–795. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70265-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alanio A, Sitterle E, Liance M, Farrugia C, Foulet F, et al. Low prevalence of resistance to azoles in Aspergillus fumigatus in a French cohort of patients treated for haematological malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:371–374. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robert VA, Casadevall A. Vertebrate endothermy restricts most fungi as potential pathogens. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1623–1626. doi: 10.1086/644642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knutsen AK, Robert V, Poot GA, Epping W, Figge M, et al. Polyphasic re-examination of Yarrowia lipolytica strains and the description of three novel Candida species: Candida oslonensis sp. nov., Candida alimentaria sp. nov. and Candida hollandica sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:2426–2435. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65200-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kurtzman CP. New species and a new combination in the Hyphopichia and Yarrowia yeast clades. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2005;88:121–130. doi: 10.1007/s10482-005-2495-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH, et al. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal perspective. PLoS One. 2006;1:e59. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Hoog GS, van den Ende GAH. Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes. Mycoses. 1998;41:183–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1998.tb00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Masclaux F, Gueho E, de Hoog GS, Christen R. Phylogenetic relationships of human-pathogenic Cladosporium (Xylohypha) species inferred from partial LS rRNA sequences. J Med Vet Mycol. 1995;33:327–338. doi: 10.1080/02681219580000651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O'Donnell K. Fusarium and its near relatives. In: Taylor DRRaJW., editor. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB International, Wallingford, United kingdom; 1993. pp. 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, et al., editors. PCR Protocols: Academic, San Diego; 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Donnelly SM, Sullivan DJ, Shanley DB, Coleman DC. Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences. Microbiology. 1999;145:1871–1882. doi: 10.1099/13500872-145-8-1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Subcommittee on AFST of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:398–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar-Powers E. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:939–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Raoux D, Hoinard D, Dromer F, et al. Mutations in the fks1 gene in Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei correlate with elevated caspofungin MICs uncovered in AM3 medium using the method of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3092–3098. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00088-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desnos-Ollivier M, Dromer F, Dannaoui E. Detection of caspofungin resistance in Candida spp. by Etest. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2389–2392. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00053-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Percentage of isolates with high MIC within genera in the Ascomycota phylum.

(XLS)

Table S2

Percentage of “resistant” isolates within genera in the Division Basidiomycota.

(XLS)

Table S3

Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for azoles.

(XLS)

Table S4

Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for Amphotericine B, Flucytosine, Terbinafine and Caspofungine.

(XLS)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES