Structural parameters governing activity of Pluronic triblock copolymers in hyperthermia cancer therapy

Abstract

Purpose

To identify specific Pluronic triblock copolymer structural properties which are critical to its function as a sensitiser in hyperthermia treatment of experimental colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

DHD/K12/TRb rat colorectal adenocarcinoma cells were exposed to Pluronics, a family of triblock copolymers with the general structure EO_x-PO_y-EO_x (EO: ethylene oxide, and PO: propylene oxide), at a range of molecular weights (Mw) and EO:PO:EO sub-unit lengths and then submitted to sublethal heat (43°C) treatment. Outcomes indicating Pluronic performance as a thermal sensitiser were correlated with its structural properties; lead candidates were determined accordingly. Finally, one of the lead candidates, Pluronic L61, a 2000 Da copolymer, was used to assess sensitising functionality in vivo in a subcutaneous rat model of colorectal carcinoma.

Results

Pluronics with 1100 ≤ Mw ≤ 3200 Da and hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) between 1–8 demonstrated the highest thermosensitising ability. Pluronics L31, L61, L62, L10 and L64 were found to be among the most effective copolymers for hyperthermia sensitisation under tested conditions. Most encouraging, L61 in synergy with hyperthermia significantly reduced tumour growth progression in vivo compared to tumours treated with hyperthermia alone.

Conclusions

Pluronic copolymer structure properties including, Mw, HLB and PO length are essential to its hyperthermia sensitising function.

Introduction

Pluronics (also known by the generic name poloxamer), a family of triblock copolymers of hydrophilic ethylene oxide (EO) and hydrophobic propylene oxide (PO) arranged in the general structure EO_x-PO_y-EO_x (where x and y indicates the number of subunits), have been an integral part of many recent therapeutic formulations for treatment of cancer. Among these applications, Husseini et al. used Pluronic 105 micelles as anticancer drug carriers and applied ultrasound to trigger the release of the drug from these micelles [1–3]. Katz et al. used Pluronic F68 to suspend 1-Docosanol for treating various types of viruses [4]. In addition, Pluronics such as L61, L81 and F127 have been used as particle size modulators and stabilising agents [5, 6]. Furthermore, Pluronic P85 and P105 have been used as sensitising agents for doxorubicin (Dox) for treating multidrug resistant (MDR) cancer [7] and others [8–16]. It has been shown that certain Pluronics selectively sensitise MDR cancer cells to chemotherapy through mechanisms of inhibiting Pgp efflux, changing membrane fluidity, depleting intracellular ATP and inhibiting mitochondrion respiration [7, 10, 13]. While a chemosensitiser is a compound that inhibits one or more functions of cells making them more susceptible to chemotherapy, a thermosensitiser is any agent that can facilitate hyperthermia-induced cell death. An ideal thermosensitiser should exhibit a synergistic effect, showing little inherent activity and increasing the effectiveness of hyperthermic stress in the affected cell.

Prior work in our group has explored the use of Pluronic as a thermosensitiser with the eventual goal of enhancing hyperthermia induced by radiofrequency (RF) ablation of solid tumours [17]. RF ablation is a viable alternative to surgical resection for patients who either have a tumour mass that is surgically inaccessible or cannot tolerate surgery due to confounding morbidities [18]. To apply this technique, the physician inserts a needle electrode percutaneously into the tumour using computed tomography, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging guidance. The electrode tip passes high-frequency current upon completing the circuit through a grounding pad to the surrounding tissue. The electric current leads to ionic agitation in the tissue and consequently frictional heat which, in the end, induces cell destruction and coagulation necrosis [19]. Despite integration of RF ablation into routine clinical practice, tumour recurrence at the tumour–normal tissue boundary remains a problem and continues to be a common cause of treatment failure [20]. Recent reports on hepatocellular carcinoma showed that up to 12% of patients had local tumour recurrence after RF ablation. While factors leading to tumour recurrence are multifaceted, one of the primary reasons for tumour recurrence following ablation is insufficient heat delivery to the tumour either due to large tumour size, particularly when tumour sizes are greater than 3 cm in diameter [21, 22], irregular shape or the presence of heat-sinking blood vessels (flowing blood carries heat energy away from tumour tissue, preventing local temperature elevation) at the periphery of the tumour. Multiple strategies have been explored to reduce the post-RF ablation tumour recurrence rate. These include instrumentation modifications to increase volume of ablation [23, 24], physiological manipulations to occlude arteries and prevent heat sink, and pharmacological modifications typically serving as adjuvant chemotherapy to increase cell death [25]. Our unique strategy uses Pluronic as a thermosensitiser which on its own has little effect but when coupled with sublethal temperatures as low as 43°C acts in synergy with the hyperthermia to lead to improved cell death. Our results have previously shown that both Pluronic P85 and L61 are effective in sensitising DHD/K12/TRb rat colorectal cancer cells to low grade (43°C) hyperthermia in vitro [17, 26]. Furthermore, P85 was also effective for enhancing RF ablation treatment of tumours formed by these cells in vivo [17]. It has previously been reported that the chemosensitising effects of Pluronics are dependent on the hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) (Equation 1) and the number of polypropylene oxide (PO) units, with HLB <20 and intermediate (between 30–60) PO units being the most effective in inhibiting Pgp efflux [11].

$$\text{HLB}=20\ast \frac{M_{\mathit{hydrophilic}}}{M_{\mathit{hydrophilic}}+M_{\mathit{hydrophobic}}}$$ (1)

where M_hydrophilic and M_hydrophobic are the molecular masses of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions of the molecule. The goal of the current study was to determine how Pluronic structure affects its ability to sensitise cancer cells to hyperthermia [27].

Materials and methods

Materials

Pluronic P85 (EO₂₆-PO₄₀-EO₂₆) and L61 (EO₂-PO₃₀-EO₂) were generously donated by BASF Corporation (Florham Park, NJ). All other Pluronic copolymers were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Table I summarises the properties of all Pluronic polymers used in these studies. Trypsin-EDTA, Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS, without calcium or magnesium), RPMI medium 1640 (with L-glutamine and with phenol red), and penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT). DispoDialyzer system (Spectra/Por®) and sterile 0.22 μm syringe driven filter units (Millex™-GP) and opaque-walled 96-well cell culture plates were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). The Caspase-sup® 3/7 assays were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI).

Table I.

Pluronic information.

Pluronic	Formulaa	Mw (Da)b	HLBc	CMC (M)d	CMC (wt%)
L31	EO2-PO16-EO2	1100	3.2	N/A
L35	EO11-PO16-EO11	1900	10	5.3 × 10−3	1.007
L61	EO2-PO31-EO2	2000	2.0	1.1 × 10−4	0.022
L44	EO10-PO23-EO10	2200	8	3.6 × 10−3	0.792
L62	EO6-PO35-EO6	2500	4.0	4.0 × 10−4	0.1
L81	EO3-PO43-EO3	2750	2.0	2.3 × 10−5	0.0063
L64	EO13-PO30-EO13	2900	8.0	4.8 × 10−4	0.14
L10	EO4-PO50-EO4	3200	2.0	N/A
L92	EO8-PO50-EO8	3650	4.0	8.8 × 10−5	0.032
L121	EO5-PO68-EO5	4400	2.0	1.0 × 10−6	0.0004
P85	EO26-PO40-EO26	4600	10	6.5 × 10−5	0.03
P123	EO20-PO69-EO20	5750	6.0	4.4 × 10−6	0.0025
F87	EO61-PO40-EO61	7700	24	9.1 × 10−5	0.07

^a,bInformation provided by the manufacturer; PO, propylene oxide; EO, ethylene oxide. Mw: molecular weight; Da: Dalton.

^cInformation calculated based on Mw of PO and EO; HLB: hydrophilic lipophilic balance.

^dCMC, critical micelle concentration; information was adapted from Batrakova et al.[39]. M: molar; wt%: weight percent.

Colorectal carcinoma model

The DHD/K12/TRb, rat colorectal adenocarcinoma was used in these studies [28]. This metastatic cell line originated from a 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon adenocarcinoma in BDIX rats. This tumour model possesses well defined properties essential for study of metastasis of colon carcinomas, such as a reproducible pattern of in vivo behaviour and the ability to be propagated both in vitro and in vivo. The cells were maintained in complete RPMI medium, containing 10% FBS and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin, in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO₂. For tumour propagation, all cells were from the second passage.

Cell treatments

Cells (10⁵/mL) were seeded in 96- or 24-well plates overnight to allow adhesion. Prior to treatment, cell medium was removed and treatment solutions of Pluronics dissolved in RPMI were added to the corresponding wells (50 and 300 μL in 96- and 24-well plates, respectively). Cells were exposed to the treatment solutions for 0–20 min at 37°C and those in the hyperthermia group were further incubated at 43°C in a circulating water bath for 20 min. This temperature was selected to mimic the minimum sublethal hyperthermia received by tumour tissue at the periphery of the ablated volume. After treatment, the test medium was removed; cells were washed twice and replenished with 100 μL of completed RPMI. Plates were returned to the incubator. WST-1 and caspase assays (described below) were carried out at 2 and 24 h after treatment. At each of the assay times, additional plates of cells were trypsinised and viable cells counted with a haemocytometer.

WST-1 assay

Dehydrogenase activity was measured with the WST-1(WST: water soluble tetrazolium, or 4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene disulphonate) assay. This assay works based on the principle that mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase, which becomes inactive in non-viable cells, catalyses the conversion of a soluble form of tetrazolium, a salt, to a coloured dye formazan changing absorbance. Theoretically, the quantified dehydrogenase activity is directly proportional to the number of live cells. The WST-1 assay was performed 24 h after treatment following manufacturer directions. Briefly, supernatant was aspirated while reagents were diluted with completed RPMI medium. 100 μL of the diluted reagents was added to each well, plates were kept for 1 h at room temperature, and the optical density was determined at λ 450 nm using a microplate reader (ELx808, Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT).

Caspase Glo® 3/7 assay

Apoptosis was determined with the Promega Caspase Glo® 3/7 assay. This assay works on the principle that caspase 3 or 7, which is activated in cells undergoing apoptosis, cleaves the added luminogenic substrate releasing aminoluciferin. This luciferin molecule subsequently reacts with luciferase resulting in the production of light. Briefly, the assay reagent was prepared, and the cells in 96-well plates were removed from the incubator. Once the reagent and the plates were equilibrated to room temperature, 100 μL of the reagent was added to each of the wells after thorough mixing by vortex. Subsequently, the contents in each well were gently mixed with a plate shaker at 300 rpm for 30 s. The plate was kept at room temperature, and the luminescence was detected 1 h later with a plate reader (TECAN, Durham, NC).

Structure-function correlation

For identifying the relationship between Pluronic structure and its thermosensitising function, one concentration (2.5 mg/mL) and exposure time (20 min) were selected to simplify the experimental design. Thirteen Pluronics, L31, L35, L44, L61, L62, L81, L64, L10, L92, L121, P85, P123 and F87 were tested. Based on these data, the enzyme activities of cells treated with the copolymers were plotted against their molecular weight (Mw).

In vivo tumour treatment efficacy studies with Pluronic L61

To demonstrate the utility of the thermosensitising strategy in vivo, L61 was selected from our in vitro results as one of the most promising candidates. To test its efficacy in enhancing hyperthermia tumours were treated with systemic L61 in combination with RF ablation. All procedures involving animals were carried out under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Case Western Reserve University. Adult male BDIX rats, bred in-house (originally obtained from Charles River Laboratories), between 5–8 weeks old received one subcutaneous tumour inoculation on each of the upper hind legs. On the day of tumour inoculation, cells were harvested by trypsin-EDTA, washed in RPMI, centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 min and resuspended at a final concentration of 2 × 10⁶ cells/mL. Cells were then loaded into individual 1-mL syringes equipped with 27-gauge needles, and a separate syringe was used for each injection site. For tumour inoculation, the rats were anaesthetised with 1% isoflurane with an O₂ flow rate of 1 L/min (EZ150 Isoflurane Vaporizer, EZ Anesthesia™). Cell suspension (50 mL) was injected subcutaneously at each site.

At an initial tumour volume of 2502±302 mm³, rats were randomly divided into two groups. One group received 0.1 mg/kg of L61 in saline intravenously followed by RF ablation 4 h later. This pretreatment time of Pluronic L61 was based on results of our pilot study and published Pluronic in vivo half-life [29]. The other group of rats received intravenous saline followed with RF ablation. The RF ablation protocol was as follows: ablation probe: 17-gauge,1-cm active single tip Radionics RF probe; temperature: 90° C; ablation duration: 3 min. Rat weight and tumour diameters (measured with calipers) were recorded weekly. The tumour volumes were estimated by:

$$v_t=\frac{a_t\cdot b_t^2}{2};$$ (2)

where a_t is the longest tumour diameter and b_t is the perpendicular diameter [30].

Statistical analysis

Two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test with unequal variances were used for in vitro analysis. The P values were determined with Microsoft Excel. Statistical significance was defined when P≤0.05. Unless otherwise noted, all data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD).

For in vivo data, the mean tumour volume changes were compared with a paired Student's t-test. In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the proportion of tumours that had not achieved a 100% reduction from baseline volume at weeks 1 to 4. Because tumours from the same animal cannot be assumed to be independent, a Cox proportional hazards regression model which takes the clustering into account was used to compare whether significant difference occurs between the curves [31–33]. This analysis was also repeated using a threshold of 50% reduction from the baseline.

Results

Enzyme activity after Pluronic exposure

Pluronic polymers L31, L61, L62, L64 and L10 in synergy with low-grade hyperthermia were able to reduce cellular enzyme activity to 25.8±8.5%.0±1.8%, 0, 0.2±0.2% and 0.6±0.3% of the untreated control, respectively. In contrast, cells treated with Pluronic alone showed a modest change to 93.1±21.1%, 66.9±21.9%, 72.8±19.5%, 89.5±29.3% and 87.2±30.2% of the untreated control. Pluronics L81, L92 and L121 appeared to be toxic to cells at the studied dose; administered alone they reduced enzyme activity to 10.8±9.9, 6.5±3.1 and 32.1±7.5% of the control, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Pluronic thermosensitising effects on DHD/K12/TRb cells in vitro after 20 min of Pluronic and hyperthermia (at 43°C) co-exposure. Pluronic concentrations are 2.5 mg/mL. Data presented as Mean±SD (standard deviation, n = 3). ★Significant difference compared to Pluronic only; ^†significant difference compared to untreated control (P < 0.05).

The investigated Pluronics were divided into two groups based on their HLB. The hydrophobic polymers were defined as those with HLB between 1 and 7, and the hydrophilic polymers were defined as those with HLB above 7. Then, the cellular enzyme activities acquired with WST-1 assay from these two groups of polymers were plotted against Pluronic structural properties including N_PO/N_EO ratio (N_PO: number of propylene oxide repeating units; N_EO: number of ethylene oxide repeating units), Mw, HLB and N_PO. For the hydrophilic polymers, the data did not exhibit any trends (Figure 2A). Similarly, when cells were treated with hydrophobic Pluronics alone, no specific trends were detectable from these data. In contrast, cellular enzyme activity of cells in the hydrophobic polymer+hyperthermia treated group followed a second order polynomial function when plotted against their molecular weight (Figure 2B) with R²=0.98. However, no detectable trends were observed when the enzyme activity was plotted against N_PO/N_EO, HLB or N_PO. Further studies are necessary to explain these observations. In summary, Pluronics with 1100≤Mw≤3200 Da and hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) between 1 to 8 were the most effective. Out of these, two Pluronics (L81, L92) lead to a drastic reduction of enzyme activity but were inherently toxic, and only one (L64) was above an HLB of 4 in this Mw range. Based on this data, we concluded that hydrophobic copolymers L31, L61, L62 and hydrophilic copolymers L64 and L10 are the most effective thermosensitisers for DHD/K12/TRb cells under the test conditions.

Figure 2.

Dependence of Pluronic bioactivity on average molecular weight: (A) hydrophilic Pluronics; (B) hydrophobic Pluronics. Results are based on the dehydrogenase activity acquired with WST-1 assay. Data presented as Mean±SD (standard deviation, n = 3).

Cell apoptosis in response to Pluronic L61

Pluronic L61 was selected among the most effective polymers for further testing due to the availability of its pharmacokinetic information and its active role (in the formulation SP1049C) in a currently ongoing Phase III clinical trial for treating late stage upper gastrointestinal cancer [13, 34]. Apoptosis was determined with a caspase 3/7 assay. According to time-dependent characterisation, caspase activity was detectable 2 h after treatment. The caspase activity was normalised by the number of viable cells per well (Figure 3). Results indicated that at 2 h, no significant difference in caspase activity was detected between L61 (0.03±0.0) treated and the untreated control (0.05±0.01) cells (P=0.1), while L61 in synergy with hyperthermia (0.1±0.0) led to an insignificant increase of caspase activity compared to L61 treated cells (P=0.07) or cells treated with hyperthermia only (0.05±0.0, P=0.016). Likewise, 24 h after treatment, L61 in synergy with hyperthermia caused drastic increase in caspase activity (0.4±0.1; P=0.005) compared to cells exposed to hyperthermia only (0.1±0.0). These data suggest that L61 in synergy with low-grade hyperthermia can lead to continuous apoptosis of the cells while neither treatment alone caused lethal harm to the cells.

Figure 3.

Caspase 3/7 activity. Data are normalised by the cell counts: (A) 2 h after treatment; (B) 24 h after treatment. Data presented as Mean±SD (standard deviation, n = 4). ★Significant difference versus hyperthermia only; ^‡significant difference versus Pluronic only (P < 0.05).

In vivo efficacy with copolymer L61

Pluronic L61 was used in conjunction with RF ablation in treatment of colorectal carcinoma in rats. During week 1–2, no significant difference was seen in tumour progression between the RF ablation only group and the combination treatment. However, beginning at week 3 and at the conclusion of the 4-week monitoring period, the relative volume of tumours treated with a combination of L61 pretreatment and RF ablation was significantly reduced (−60.5±55.5%; P=0.02) compared to those treated with RF ablation alone (51.1±155.6%). More noteworthy, by physical palpation, 6/17 (35%) tumours treated with L61+RF ablation were undetectable and more than half, 9/17 (53%), of these tumours reduced in volume by more than 80%. In contrast, 3/17 (18%) of the tumours from RF ablation alone treated groups were not detectable by physical palpation and reduced in volume by more than 80% (Figure 4). Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate the proportion of tumours that had not achieved a 100% reduction from baseline volume at weeks 1–4 [33]. Results from the Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that significant difference occurred between the two treatment groups with L61+RF ablation being more efficacious than RF ablation (P=0.03, Figure 5). This analysis was repeated using a threshold of 50% reduction from baseline, and results did not differ (P=0.03).

Figure 4.

Change in tumour volume relative to size before treatment in response to radiofrequency ablation with or without Pluronic L61. Data presented as Mean±SD (standard deviation, n = 17). Portions of the error bars were omitted for presentation clarity. ★Indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

Figure 5.

Proportion of tumours showing shrinkage of <100% in volume. Estimation was done with Kaplan-Meier survival methods and the statistics were acquired with the Cox proportional hazards regression model (P = 0.03).

Discussion

The goal of this work was to examine how structural properties of Pluronic influence its performance as a thermosensitising agent in hyperthermia treatment of a model rat colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. Data from 13 Pluronics were acquired. Our results showed that Pluronic L31, L61, L62, L64 and L10 were the most effective thermosensitisers, while copolymers L81, L92 and L121 showed inherent toxicity to cells. Subsequently, the cellular enzyme activity was correlated to N_PO – the number of hydrophobic units and the polymer molecular weight (Mw). It appears that copolymers with lower molecular weight between 1100 to 3200 Da and a HLB <8 are more likely to have effective thermosensitising ability for DHD/K12/TRb cells under the test conditions. Pluronics that were effective thermosensitisers shared one particular structural characteristic – the N_PO of these polymers were even multiples of the length of 16 C-C (carbon-carbon) bond length; and it is the typical length of mammalian lipid fatty acid tail of a cell membrane which is commonly 16 or 18 carbon atoms length [35]. This may suggest a geometrical compatibility requirement for the proper interaction between copolymers and the cell membranes. Studies have shown a correlation between cell membrane fluidity change upon hyperthermia treatment, suggesting that the more sensitive a cell type is to hyperthermia, the more fluid the membrane becomes upon hyperthermia treatment. Conversely, a cell type that was more resistant to hyperthermia treatment will show less of a fluidity increase upon hyperthermia treatment [36]. A geometrically compatible copolymer may be able to change the confirmation of cell membrane proteins which has been indicated as a potential pathway for sensitising thermo-tolerant cells [37]. However, more studies are needed in order to draw specific conclusions.

Interestingly, our results mostly agreed with the four group-grid model developed by Batrakova et al. (Figure 6) indicating that L10, L61, L62 and L64, the effective thermosensitisers in our studies, are the Group II polymers in the 4 group-grid model [11]. This may imply a common pathway between Pluronic copolymer thermo- and chemosensitisation. Based on this 4 group-grid model created by Batrakova et al., Pluronic copolymers L81, L92 and P85 should be effective candidates for thermo-sensitisation. In our studies, L81 and L92 demonstrated inherent toxicity, while P85 did not show much hyperthermia enhancement. However, our prior work has shown that P85 was effective in sensitising DHD/K12/TRb cells to low-grade hyperthermia at longer exposure times [17, 26]. We speculate that the toxic effects of L81 and L92 are due to relatively high concentration tested in our studies; and the ineffectiveness of P85 in this work is attributable to its low concentration and shorter exposure times compared to the prior data [17]. Further experiments are required to confirm this assumption. Another anomaly between our model and the 4 group-grid model was observed. According to our model, L31, a group IIIa polymer, is an effective thermosensitiser, and L35 and L44 (also group IIIa polymers) are intermediate in effectiveness. However, according to Batrakova et al., all of these polymers have little effect in modulating P-glycoprotein. To fully adapt this model to our results, it may be appropriate to modify the 4 group-grid model by expanding group II polymer population to include the group IIIa polymers.

Figure 6.

The four-group Pluronic copolymer grid based on Pluronic HLB and N_PO adapted from a previously published model [11]. Here the authors categorised the investigated Pluronic copolymers into four groups according to the HLB and N_PO numbers. According to their results, Group II polymers were the most effective in modulating P-glycoprotein, while polymers from Group I and III showed little effect.

As demonstrated in prior studies, structural properties of Pluronic appear to influence its in vitro and in vivo behaviour [29, 38]. For example Kabanov et al. demonstrated that the tissue distribution of Pluronic is dependent on the length of the hydrophobic block. Specifically, the longer the hydrophobic PO block and the shorter the hydrophilic EO blocks, the higher the tissue distribution coefficient (organ to plasma ratio) and the higher the organ retention. Also in this study, results show that L61 had a higher liver (4.93) distribution coefficient compared to that of P85 which is 3.38 [38]. This information suggests that L61 may be overall more relevant for treating colorectal metastasis to the liver – a common target of RF ablation treatment. Because of this fact, and its readily available pharmacokinetic information and its active role in an ongoing clinical trial for chemosensitisation, L61,which was among the most effective copolymers from our in vitro studies, was selected for testing its efficacy in enhancing RF ablation [13, 34].

Our in vivo data (Figures 4 and 5) show that tumours treated with a combination of L61 pretreatment and RF ablation exhibited a significant reduction in size compared to RF ablation only at 3 and 4 weeks after treatment. Also of note is that, 1 week after treatment, tumour volumes increased due to inflammatory effects. Interestingly, dissimilar to the tumour volumes treated with P85 pretreatment in combination with RF ablation [17], the L61 pretreatment in combination with RF ablation did not reduce the inflammatory response. To discern the cause of this discrepancy, further investigation is needed.

Conclusion

In this work we aimed to determine the ultimate Pluronic copolymer structure for enhancing hyperthermia cancer treatment. Our results indicate that a delicate balance between molecular weight, HLB and number of propylene oxide blocks is critically important to this function. Pluronics with lower molecular weight between 1100 to 3200 Da and a HLB <8 demonstrated the highest thermosensitising ability with Pluronics L31, L61, L62, L10 and L64 among the most effective copolymers for hyperthermia sensitisation under tested conditions. Most encouraging, L61 in synergy with hyperthermia significantly reduced tumour growth progression in vivo compared to tumours treated with hyperthermia alone. These results further imply the positive role Pluronic may play in hyperthermia cancer treatment.