Skip to main content
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI logoLink to Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI
letter
. 2012 Mar;19(3):458. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05568-11

Poliovirus Neutralization Test with Poliovirus Pseudovirus To Measure Neutralizing Antibody in Humans

Subhash C Arya 1,, Nirmala Agarwal 1
PMCID: PMC3294615  PMID: 22371252

LETTER

We complement Arita et al. (1) for their development of a safe, simple, and rapid test, employing poliovirus pseudovirus (generating luciferase signals) instead of the wild poliovirus, to measure the poliovirus neutralizing antibody titer in human serum. Apart from the end game of the global poliomyelitis eradication program, poliovirus pseudovirus technology (1) would be advantageous in the surveillance of cohorts of children and adults rendered poliovirus susceptible after therapeutic interventions for malignancy or organ transplants.

Some children and adults under chemotherapy regimens after organ transplants, as well as those infected with human immunodeficiency virus, constitute cohorts lacking poliovirus neutralizing antibodies (3). Cytostatic therapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia in children results in a temporary reduction of specific antibody levels. Both the reduced and standard chemotherapy regimens for acute childhood lymphoblastic leukemia in Utrecht, Netherlands, were accompanied by decreased antibody levels against vaccine-preventable diseases (5).

During future fine-tuning of the threshold values for protective antibody against the three poliovirus serotypes, it would be desirable to express poliovirus neutralizing titer obtained with pseudovirus technology (1) in international units rather than an arbitrary dilution figure. Comparison of inter- and intralaboratory serologic data would be more explicit using international units. Rather than an arbitrary dilution figure, the antibody content would be more explicit in international units. Serologic data on representative post-oral-poliovirus-vaccine sera from Germany were expressed in such units (2). Furthermore, protective neutralizing antibody titers for three polioviruses in 1,133 individuals older than 2 years in mainland Portugal were also expressed in international units (4).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest and that no ethical clearance was required and no financial support provided.

Footnotes

For the author reply, see doi:10.1128/CVI.05698-11.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Arita M, Iwai M, Wakita T, Shimizu H. 2011. Development of a poliovirus neutralization test with poliovirus pseudovirus for measurement of neutralizing antibody titer in human serum. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18:1889–1894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Diedrich S, Claus H, Schreier E. 2002. Immunity against poliomyelitis in Germany: determination of cut-off values in international units. BMC Infect. Dis. 2:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Machado CM. 2004. Re-immunization after bone marrow transplantation—current recommendations and perspectives. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 37:151–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pires de Miranda M, Carmo Gomes M, Rebelo de Andrade H. 2007. Seroprevalence of antibodies to poliovirus in individuals living in Portugal, 2002. Euro Surveill. 12:E7–E8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. van Tilburg CM, et al. 25 July 2011. Impact of treatment reduction for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia on serum immunoglobulin and antibodies against vaccine-preventable diseases. Pediatr. Blood Cancer [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1002/pbc.23258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES