Abstract
The glucose-phosphotransferase system (PTS) in Escherichia coli K-12 is a complex sensory and regulatory system. In addition to its central role in glucose uptake, it informs other global regulatory networks about carbohydrate availability and the physiological status of the cell. The expression of the ptsG gene encoding the glucose-PTS transporter EIICBGlc is primarily regulated via the repressor Mlc, whose inactivation is glucose dependent. During transport of glucose and dephosphorylation of EIICBGlc, Mlc binds to the B domain of the transporter, resulting in derepression of several Mlc-regulated genes. In addition, Mlc can also be inactivated by the cytoplasmic protein MtfA in a direct protein-protein interaction. In this study, we identified the binding site for Mlc in the carboxy-terminal region of MtfA by measuring the effect of mutated MtfAs on ptsG expression. In addition, we demonstrated the ability of MtfA to inactivate an Mlc super-repressor, which cannot be inactivated by EIICBGlc, by using in vivo titration and gel shift assays. Finally, we characterized the proteolytic activity of purified MtfA by monitoring cleavage of amino 4-nitroanilide substrates and show Mlc's ability to enhance this activity. Based on our findings, we propose a model of MtfA as a glucose-regulated peptidase activated by cytoplasmic Mlc. Its activity may be necessary during the growth of cultures as they enter the stationary phase. This proteolytic activity of MtfA modulated by Mlc constitutes a newly identified PTS output signal that responds to changes in environmental conditions.
INTRODUCTION
Despite the fact that Escherichia coli K-12 has been an important model organism for many decades, the function of >20% of all putative open reading frames in its genome remains unknown. Moreover, in many cases, no obvious sequence similarities with previously characterized proteins exist. The mtfA gene (formerly named yeeI), a monocistronic gene located at 44.1 min in the E. coli chromosome, has clearly belonged to this group. Intensive sequence similarity searches revealed that orthologs of MtfA (mnemonic for Mlc titration factor A) exist in more than 100 proteobacteria of the alpha, beta, and gamma subdivisions. In a previous report (2), we were able to demonstrate that E. coli MtfA is a cytoplasmic protein that binds to the carboxy-terminal part of the Mlc repressor protein (mnemonic for “making large colonies” [gene, dgsA]) with a very high affinity. Mlc is one of the global regulators of carbohydrate metabolism in E. coli and is especially involved in the regulation of the ptsG gene expression, which encodes the glucose transporter EIICBGlc. The EIICBGlc together with the cytoplasmic protein EIIAGlc, encoded by the crr gene (as part of the ptsHI-crr operon), forms the glucose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent carbohydrate-phosphotransferase system (glucose-PTS). Both proteins take part in a phosphorylation cascade, which begins with an autophosphorylation reaction of the so-called enzyme I (EI; gene, ptsI) at the expense of PEP. The phosphate group is subsequently transferred from EI to the phosphohistidine carrier protein HPr (gene, ptsH) and then to the sugar-specific enzymes II and finally to the carbohydrate (for a review, see reference 23). In addition to its transport and carbohydrate phosphorylation functions, the glucose-PTS in enteric bacteria has a central regulatory role in carbon catabolite repression and inducer exclusion (reviewed in references 7 and 15). Many recent studies have revealed that the regulation of ptsG expression is very complex and takes place at both the transcriptional and the posttranscriptional levels (reviewed in references 3 and 12). In addition, there also exists a direct regulation of transport activity that prevents intracellular hexose phosphate stress (10, 32). In the absence of glucose, ptsG expression is repressed by Mlc. In the presence of glucose, dephosphorylated EIICBGlc, which is generated during glucose uptake, binds Mlc and sequesters the repressor away from its DNA-binding sites (13, 16, 28, 34; for reviews, see references 3 and 21). Hence, in contrast to other regulatory systems, there is no intracellular low-molecular-weight inducer for Mlc. The EIICBGlc/Mlc system is considered to be an important glucose sensor in enteric bacteria (13, 34), since Mlc is also involved in the glucose-dependent regulation of the ptsHI-crr operon (20, 29), the malT gene for transcriptional activation of the maltose regulon (6), and the manXYZ operon encoding the EII proteins of the mannose-PTS (18).
Although MtfA has been shown to interact with Mlc and to work as an antirepressor, its true function has not yet been elucidated. We were interested in determining what the cellular role of MtfA was. Thus, in the first part of this study we further characterized the specific interaction between MtfA and Mlc. By generating a collection of MtfA mutants, we identified the Mlc-binding domain within this highly conserved protein. Furthermore, we characterized the interaction between MtfA and the Mlc*H86R super-repressor, which is no longer capable of interacting with EIICBGlc (27). This allowed us to elucidate differences between the inactivation modes of Mlc by membrane sequestration through EIICBGlc on the one hand and cytoplasmic titration by MtfA on the other.
Recently, the crystal structure of the MtfA homologue from Klebsiella pneumoniae was characterized (doi:10.2210/pdb3khi/pdb). Interestingly, the structure revealed similarities to the zinc-dependent metalloprotease lethal factor (LF) from Bacillus anthracis, as well as to other metalloproteases of the gluzincin clan. Hence, the second goal of this study was to characterize the peptidase activity of MtfA and address the influence of Mlc on MtfA's proteolytic activity. We present a model that postulates MtfA to be a glucose-regulated peptidase, whose activity is regulated by binding to Mlc available in the cytoplasm, which in turn has been released from EIICBGlc during times when no glucose is taken up. Finally, we speculate about putative biologically relevant MtfA targets, which may have a function in growth transition under changing environmental conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Media and growth conditions.
Cells were grown routinely either in Lennox broth without glucose and calcium ions (LBo) or in 2× TY medium as described previously (1). Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: tetracycline, 10 mg/liter; ampicillin, 50 mg/liter; and chloramphenicol, 25 mg/liter.
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
All strains used were E. coli K-12 derivatives. Table 1 list the genotypes and sources of the relevant bacterial strains. Information on the plasmids and oligonucleotides is given in the supplemental material. P1 transduction was performed as described previously (2).
Table 1.
Escherichia coli strains used in this study
| Strain | Relevant genotype or phenotype | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|
| JM109 | thi-1 Δ(lac-proAB) recA1 hsdR1 F′ traD36 proA+B+lacIqZ M15 | 33 |
| LZ110 | LJ110 ΔlacU169 zah-735::Tn10 tet | 34 |
| LZ150 | LZ110 Δ(ptsG::cat+) | 34 |
| JEK5 | LZ110 Δ(dgsA::Tn10 kan) | This study |
| JSW1 | JEK5 pheU::dgsA+cat+ | This study |
| JSW2 | JEK5 pheU::dgsA*(Mlc*H86R) cat+ | This study |
| XL1-Blue | recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac F′ proAB+lacIqZΔM15 Tn10 Tcr | Stratagene |
| SU202 | lexA71::Tn5 su1A211 sulA::lacZ ΔlacU169 F′ lacIqlacZΔM15::Tn9 | 8 |
Isolation of chromosomal and plasmid DNA, restriction analysis, PCR, and DNA sequencing.
All manipulations of chromosomal or recombinant DNA were carried out using standard procedures as described previously (1). Plasmid DNA was prepared using QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Schwalbach, Germany) or Fermentas (St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and used according to supplier recommendations. Oligonucleotides for PCR were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Ulm, Germany). DNA sequencing was commissioned to Scientific Research and Development (Bad Homburg, Germany). Alternatively, DNA was sequenced with an ABI 3100 Avant (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at the Center for Medical Genetics in Osnabrück. PCRs were performed as described by (24) using TaKaRa DNA polymerase from Lonza (Cologne, Germany).
Construction of pTM30mlchis.
To purify Mlc, we used PCR to amplify the corresponding dgsA gene using the oligonucleotides MlcBamHI and MlcHindIII (see the supplemental material) and genomic DNA of E. coli K-12. Thus, BamHI and a HindIII restriction sites were inserted into the PCR product. Afterward, the PCR product was cloned in the pTM30 expression vector. An amino-terminal His tag was added to the protein using His tag-encoding complementary oligonucleotides MlcHis+ and MlcHis−. Then, 10 μg of each oligonucleotide was dissolved in 10 μl of sterile water. After the addition of 2 μl of annealing buffer (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) the mixture was heated to 95°C and incubated at room temperature in a 1-liter beaker with 95°C water until the water temperature reached 40°C. We then opened the vector pTM30mlc with BamHI and ligated the previously annealed oligonucleotides with this vector to generate the vector pTM30mlchis. In addition, for the MtfA protease activity assay, we amplified the dgsA gene using the oligonucleotides Mlchis-tev and MlcHindIII (see the supplemental material) and ligated it into the pTM30 vector to generate the plasmid pTM30mlchis-tev. This plasmid encoded an amino-terminal His-tagged dgsA gene as pTM30mlchis, and a TEV-protease cleavage site between the tag and protein. We treated the purified protein with TEV-protease (AcTEV protease; Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This resulted in an untagged Mlc protein with an additional glycine in front of the native amino acid sequence.
Site-directed mutagenesis.
We generated defined mutations in the mtfA gene using the pTMByeeI-S plasmid (2) and the QuickChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit according to the standard protocol (Stratagene, Amsterdam, Netherlands). In addition, we introduced mutations into the dgsA gene with the same kit and using the pTM30mlchis plasmid as a template. The oligonucleotides used are listed in the supplemental material.
Construction of strains JSW1 and JSW2.
To characterize the interaction between MtfA and Mlc, we inserted a single copy of the dgsA wild-type gene or the dgsA* derivative encoding the Mlc*H86R super-repressor mutation (in combination with a cat gene for a chloramphenicol resistance selection marker) into the chromosome of JEK5 at the pheU site via site-directed recombination. In doing so, we applied the RecA-independent recombination mechanism of the conjugative transposon CTnscr94 (11) (the exact procedure is described elsewhere). PCR was used to confirm correct integration of the desired gene copy.
Western blot analyses and β-galactosidase assays.
Bacterial cells harboring pTMByeeI-S as described previously (2) grown in LBo medium were harvested at an optical density at 650 nm (OD650) of 1 by centrifugation and resuspended in 100 μl of sterile water and 100 μl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 10% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenol blue). If not stated otherwise, the samples were heated at 95°C for 10 min. Portions (15 μl) of the total cellular proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 0.1% SDS-containing 15% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). For the detection of MtfA protein derivatives, we used a penta-His antibody (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) except in the case of the two hybrid studies, where we used a polyclonal anti-MtfA antibody. Detection of antibody-binding was performed using infrared-labeled second antibodies (LI-COR Biosciences, Bad Homburg, Germany). Visualization and quantification were performed with an Odyssey infrared imager (LI-COR Biosciences). All β-galactosidase assays were performed as previously described (2).
Bacterial two-hybrid studies.
Bacterial two-hybrid studies were performed as described previously (8). The genes mtfA, mtfA(Δ1–83), and dgsA were amplified by PCR. PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and subsequently transferred into the vectors pMS604 or pDL804 (8) using a combination of the restriction enzymes BstEII/XhoI or XhoI/BglII, respectively, or, in the case of pMM4, PstI/XhoI. Oligonucleotides were used in PCRs as follows: pMM2, BTH7 and BTH8; pDM2, BTH1 and BTH3; pMM3, MlcPX+/−; pDM3, MlcXB+/−; and pMM4, Ymlcpms+/−. All oligonucleotide sequences are given in the supplemental material.
Protein purification.
For purification of MtfA-His5, cells harboring pTMByeeI-S or derivatives were grown in LBo with ampicillin and 500 μM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside). When cultures reached an OD650 of 3, the cells were harvested by centrifugation. Cells were subsequently resuspended in buffer A (300 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 mM Potassium phosphate (KPi), 10% glycerol [pH 8.0]) and disrupted by sonication using a Branson Sonifier W-250D (Danbury, CT). Cell debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation (14,000 rpm). We then performed affinity chromatography using the ÄKTA-FPLC and His-Trap FF columns (GE Healthcare). Elution was performed with the buffer described above with an additional 300 mM imidazole. Subsequently, we obtained the samples and dialyzed them against 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0). Finally, we stored them at 4°C or supplemented them with 50% glycerol and stored them at −20°C.
For the purification of Mlc, cells harboring pTM30mlchis were grown in 2× TY or LBo with ampicillin until reaching an OD650 of 0.5, induced with 500 μM IPTG, and harvested at an OD650 of 2. Harvesting and disruption were performed as described previously, using a 50 mM sodium phosphate (NaPi) (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole buffer. For Mlc purification, it was also suitable to use affinity chromatography as described for MtfA. Elution was performed with a buffer containing 50 mM NaPi (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, and 200 μM ZnCl2. Afterward, the sample was dialyzed against HEPES buffer (100 mM HEPES [pH 9.0], 25 mM sodium glutamate, 1 mM dithiothreitol) and stored at 4°C.
EMSAs.
For the electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), the fluorescence-labeled ptsG operator fragment according to (19) encoded by the complementary oligonucleotides ptsG01 (5′ labeled with DY782) and ptsG02 (5′ labeled with DY682) was annealed as described for the Mlc His tag. Then, 10 μg of bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5 μg of herring sperm-DNA as heterologous DNA, 100 nM ZnCl2, and 500 nM MgCl2 were added to 1 ng of the operator fragment (4 nM final concentration in the assay). The stated amounts of Mlc and MtfA were incubated for 10 min at room temperature and afterward added to the mixture, which was then brought to a final volume of 20 μl using HEPES buffer containing 1 μg of BSA/μl. Samples were incubated for an additional 10 min at room temperature and loaded on a 5% acrylamide-bisacrylamide gel. We performed electrophoresis at a constant voltage of 150 V and detection using the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences).
Protease activity assays.
A protease assay kit from Calbiochem (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to determine endoprotease activity of purified MtfA according to the manufacturer's instructions. We determined the amino peptidase activities of MtfA by measuring the hydrolysis of l-alanine 4-nitroanilide, l-arginine 4-nitroanilide, l-proline 4-nitroanilide, l-valine 4-nitroanilide, or l-alanine-l-alanine-l-alanine-4-nitronalide (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) and performed an endpoint measurement of the chromophoric end product 4-nitroanilide using spectral photometric determination of the absorbance at 390 nm (Shimadzu UV mini 1240 photometer; molar extinction coefficient, 11.5 × 106 cm2 mol−1). The assay was carried out in semi-microcuvettes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). We added 100 μg of purified protein to 500 μl of 1 mM l-amino 4-nitroanilide. The samples were then filled to a final volume of 1 ml with Tris-buffer (pH 8.0) and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The absorbance was measured against a blank sample without protein (500 μl of l-alanine 4-nitroanilide with 500 μl of Tris buffer) at 390 nm. In the case of hippuryl-l-phenylalanine and hippuryl-l-arginine (Sigma), the absorbance was determined at 254 nm. We conducted a subsequent endpoint measurement, determined the extinction difference (ΔE), and calculated the specific activity in U/mg of protein of each preparation. All specific activities of purified proteins were compared to a fresh sample of the wild-type protein. If indicated, we added the inhibitors AEBSF [4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride; Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany], EDTA (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), or phenanthroline (Sigma) in the denoted concentrations to the assay.
RESULTS
Multiple alignments to identify highly conserved amino acids.
MtfA is a highly conserved protein that is not only restricted to the group of enterobacteria but can also be found in the alpha-, beta-, and gammaproteobacteria subdivisions, as well as in cyanobacteria. In order to further characterize the interaction between MtfA and Mlc, we created a multiple alignment of various MtfA proteins to identify highly conserved amino acid residues that might be of functional importance (Fig. 1). In this alignment, MtfA homologs from 10 different bacteria and covering a broad spectrum of identity were used (39 to 89% identical amino acid residues). All of these bacteria harbor an Mlc homolog protein. Twenty-five amino acid residues were identified as absolutely invariant, and another 32 residues were highly conserved. One important conserved motif is composed of the sequence 149HExxH153, which characterizes zinc-dependent metalloproteases. Interestingly, many invariant amino acid residues were clustered at the carboxy-terminal end of MtfA, indicating another important region of the protein. Based on this multiple alignment, a collection of highly conserved amino acid residues were separately substituted by site-directed mutagenesis (marked in gray).
Fig 1.
Multiple alignment of MtfAEco and ortholog proteins from other bacteria. The amino acid sequence of MtfAEco was aligned with the presented homologues using the CLUSTALW program. Abbreviations are as follows: Eco, Escherichia coli gi|90111364; Efe, Escherichia fergusonii gi|22034302; Kpn, Klebsiella pneumoniae gi|152970975; Sty, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium gi|16420534; Ype, Yersinia pestis gi|22126457; Cvi, Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC gi|34104211; Psy, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 gi|28851187; Xca, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strain ATCC 33913 gi|21115196; Rso, Ralstonia solanacearum GMI 1000 gi|17428198; Npu, Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102 gi|23129869. Identical residues are marked by an asterisk (*), highly conserved residues are marked by a colon (:), and conserved residues are marked by a period (.). Numbers of identical residues in binary comparisons between E. coli MtfA and the respective homologues of all other bacteria are given in the box. Substituted amino acids are shaded in gray.
Substitution of conserved amino acids and determination of protein stability.
To further analyze the interaction between MtfA and the repressor protein Mlc, we used site-directed mutagenesis to define mutants of MtfA. In order to identify specific effects of single amino acid residues, we created substitutions with chemically related residues. Western blot analysis was used to test protein stability of all MtfA derivatives. In almost all cases, a signal was detected at the expected size of 32 kDa. Only the two derivatives with the substitutions I148E (in contrast to I148Y) and A215D (in contrast to A215S) exhibited massive protein decay (data not shown). Thus, compared to the wild type, the majority of MtfA derivatives provided an equally stable protein, which could then be further characterized.
Titration of Mlc by MtfA and its derivatives in vivo.
The intensity of the interaction between the Mlc and MtfA wild type or its derivatives was tested in vivo using a quantitative measure of the β-galactosidase activity of a single-copy ptsGop-lacZ fusion (34). The test system is depicted in Fig. 2. We introduced plasmids encoding MtfA or its derivatives into the indicated strain background (e.g., dgsA+ strain, with deletions of ptsG and lacZ), induced mtfA expression, and measured the strength of Mlc titration by determining β-galactosidase activities. The β-galactosidase activity of completely induced MtfA wild type was always used as a control and set to 100%, basal expression levels were determined using the empty expression vector pTM30 (shown by gray columns in Fig. 3). A total of 25 of the 59 MtfA derivatives tested exhibited no or only minor reduction in Mlc titration (at least 80% wild-type activity, white columns in Fig. 3). However, 34 different MtfA mutants exhibited a significantly reduced Mlc titration (indicated by black columns in Fig. 3). Within the amino-terminal part of the MtfA, only the two substitutions L40E and A70D led to decreased interaction with Mlc. In contrast, a replacement of these two residues by other neutral amino acids (L40A or L40T and A70S, respectively) had almost no effect, indicating that negative charges at these positions either interfere with the protein-protein interaction or with the overall conformation of the protein. Within the carboxy-terminal part of MtfA, many different amino acid substitutions led to substantial changes in the interactions with Mlc. In particular, the two regions from positions 132 to 149 and positions 214 to 243 seemed to be essential for the binding of Mlc. Due to PCR artifacts, we found eight derivatives with an additional mutation next to the substitution of interest. In cases where strong effects were present, we reintroduced the conserved amino acid residue to study the impacts of each single substitution. In the case of the D156N/D161E double mutant, the latter mutation suppressed the phenotype of the first. In the Y205S/A207D double mutant, the decreasing interaction with Mlc appeared to be due to a cumulative effect, since each single mutation exhibited higher β-galactosidase activity. In the case of the V216L/L217I double mutant the decrease in interaction seems to be caused by the latter change, because the single V216L mutation had almost no effect. However, changing V216 to an aspartate residue again reduced the activity to less than 50%, indicating that both residues may be important. For all other double mutants, the second substitution did not change the result of the single substitution of the conserved amino acid.
Fig 2.
Test system to quantify the MtfA interaction with Mlc in vivo. This figure illustrates the test system for phenotyping MtfA mutants. The strain background LZ150F′::Φ(ptsGop-lacZ) provides a chromosomally encoded dgsA+ gene (mlc+), chromosomal deletions of the ptsG and the lacZ genes, and a single copy ptsGop-lacZ fusion on an F′ plasmid. MtfA or its derivatives were introduced via the IPTG-inducible expression plasmid pTMByeeI-S or derivatives thereof, respectively. Since Mlc cannot bind to the EIIBGlc domain in this strain, it can only be inactivated by MtfA. Thus, inactivation of Mlc by MtfA is reflected by high β-galactosidase activities.
Fig 3.
β-Galactosidase activities for the quantification of the interactions between MtfA wild type or derivatives thereof with Mlc in vivo. The results of phenotyping MtfA and defined mutants with regard to Mlc titration are shown. The test system presented in Fig. 2 was used. Cells harboring the pTMByeeI-S vector or derivatives thereof were grown in LBo, mtfA expression was induced with IPTG, and cells were harvested for β-galactosidase activity assays. The activity of the wild-type control (pTMByeeI-S), which was usually ∼850 nmol per mg of protein per min, was set to 100% in each set of experiments. The empty expression vector pTM30 served as a negative control (represented by gray bars). Mutants, which exhibited β-galactosidase activities of >80% of the wild-type level, were drawn in white columns. In contrast, MtfA mutants with <80% activity, which reflected a severe reduction of Mlc binding, are presented by black columns. MtfA mutants K/Q/K/Q and A/A/A denote substitutions H149K/E150Q/H153K/E212Q and H149A/E150A/H153A, respectively. Averages of at least three independent tests with standard deviations are given.
The carboxy terminus of MtfA binds Mlc in a bacterial two-hybrid assay.
Given the results from the in vivo titration assays, the carboxy-terminal part of MtfA appears to be responsible for the binding of Mlc. To verify this hypothesis, we used a bacterial two-hybrid assay (8). This assay used a chromosomal lacZ gene under the control of a hybrid lexA operator-promoter region in the E. coli test strain SU202. One-half of this artificial operator is recognized by the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain of the LexA wild-type repressor, the other half by a LexA* mutant. Both DNA-binding domains are encoded by compatible plasmids and can be coupled to different proteins of interest. Expression of these hybrid genes can be induced by IPTG. Only in the case of cross talk between the two hybrid proteins did the two different DNA-binding domains of LexA and LexA* come together to repress lacZ expression, as was seen in the two control plasmids pMS604 (encoding a LexA-Fos-hybrid protein) and pDL804 (encoding a LexA*-Jun-hybrid protein). As shown in Fig. 4, when fused to the LexA DNA-binding domain, both full-length MtfA and MtfAΔ1-83, which is missing the amino-terminal part of the protein, are able to interact with Mlc fused to LexA*. These results clearly demonstrate that the carboxy-terminal part of MtfA is sufficient for Mlc binding. Furthermore, as an internal control, we fused Mlc to both different DNA-binding domains of the LexA repressor. Expression of these two hybrid proteins resulted in a low β-galactosidase activity after induction, confirming the previously published dimerization (tetramerization) of Mlc (26). Cells with only one of the two LexA-Mlc hybrid proteins always showed a very high β-galactosidase activity, indicating a high specificity of the different LexA DNA-binding domains for their cognate operator sites (data not shown).
Fig 4.
Bacterial two-hybrid assays to test in vivo interaction of MtfA with Mlc. Cells were grown in LBo without (−) and with (+) IPTG, harvested, and analyzed for their β-galactosidase activities. Control samples [SU202, test strain without any plasmid as a negative control; pMS (LexA-Fos-hybrid protein)/pDL (LexA*-Jun-hybrid protein) as a positive control] are shown in gray. The results for the analyzed test samples (pMM3 and pDM3, Mlc full-length constructs; pMM2, MtfA full-length construct; pMM4, MtfAΔ1–83 construct) are illustrated by the white bars. All test combinations showed reduced β-galactosidase activities (given in nmol per min and mg of total cell protein) under inducing conditions, which indicates an interaction of the fusion proteins. Averages of at least three independent measurements and standard deviations are given.
Gel shift assays confirm Mlc titration by MtfA.
Our in vivo results indicated that the interaction between MtfA and Mlc prevents binding of the repressor to the ptsG operator. In order to further characterize this effect, we used EMSAs with purified Mlc and MtfA proteins. Addition of Mlc to a ptsG operator gene (ptsGop) fragment led to the formation of a repressor-operator complex and thus a mobility shift (Fig. 5a). In contrast, addition of MtfA to the labeled operator fragment had no effect, indicating that MtfA has no DNA-binding properties. Incubation of Mlc and MtfA prior to incubation with the DNA reduced the amount of the repressor-operator complex. Increasing amounts of MtfA led to an increasing fraction of free ptsGop DNA. A supercomplex of DNA, Mlc, and MtfA was never observed.
Fig 5.
EMSAs with purified Mlc and MtfA proteins. (a) A fluorescence-labeled DNA fragment containing the Mlc-binding sites in front of the ptsG gene (ptsGop) was incubated with different combinations of purified Mlc and MtfA and subsequently run on a native gel. A control sample without any protein (−) led to an unshifted signal of the DNA. After incubation of the operator fragment with purified Mlc (+), a retarded Mlc-DNA complex could be detected. The addition of purified MtfA (150 nM in the assay) caused no band shift. Incubation of Mlc (usually 25 nM in the assay) with rising amounts of MtfA (usually 25 to 150 nM in the assay) as indicated prior to the incubation with ptsGop led to an increasing release of operator fragments. (b) Incubation of the ptsG operator fragment with purified super-repressor Mlc*H86R led to the generation of an Mlc-DNA complex. Similar to the results obtained for the wild-type repressor, addition of MtfA to the band shift assay prior to the incubation with ptsGop led to released operator fragments. (c) Incubation of the ptsG operator fragment with purified wild-type Mlc and increasing amounts of MtfA E150D. (d) Incubation of the ptsG operator fragment with purified wild-type Mlc and increasing amounts of MtfA E150Q (further explanation is given in the text).
MtfA binds to the super repressor Mlc*H86R in vivo and in vitro.
In order to distinguish between the two currently known inactivating mechanisms for Mlc, we used an Mlc super-repressor. This Mlc* derivative carries an amino acid substitution of histidine 86 to arginine and is unable to bind the unphosphorylated B domain of the EIICBGlc (27). Thus, in contrast to the wild type, the super-repressor cannot be inactivated by EIICBGlc. The in vivo interaction between the super-repressor Mlc*H86R and MtfA was investigated using a similar system as presented in Fig. 2. In the case of the Mlc wild type in strain LZ110, overexpression of MtfA caused a high β-galactosidase activity of the single copy ptsGop-lacZ fusion, as expected (Fig. 6). In contrast, the introduction of a dgsA deletion into this strain background (resulting in JEK5) led to a constitutive β-galactosidase activity. Interestingly, overexpression of MtfA caused a significant increase of ptsG expression in the absence of Mlc. Since MtfA does not directly bind to the ptsG operator as shown in Fig. 5, this might indicate some as-yet-unknown interaction of MtfA with a different regulator of ptsG expression. Subsequently, we reintroduced into JEK5 a single copy of either a wild-type dgsA+ (giving strain JSW1) or the dgsA* allele encoding the Mlc*H86R super-repressor (giving strain JSW2). Both repressors strongly reduced the ptsGop-lacZ expression. Remarkably, JSW2 harboring the super-repressor Mlc*H86R exhibited almost no basal β-galactosidase activity. Induction of plasmid-encoded mtfA+ in both strain backgrounds resulted in high expression of the ptsGop-lacZ fusion, meaning that both wild-type Mlc and Mlc*H86R can be bound and inactivated by MtfA. However, corresponding to the very low basal expression level in the presence of the super-repressor, β-galactosidase activity in JSW2 after induction of the mtfA+ strain were always lower compared to the wild type.
Fig 6.
β-Galactosidase assays for the characterization of the in vivo interaction between MtfA wild type and either Mlc wild type or Mlc*H86R super-repressor. The test system was similar to the one described in Fig. 2. LZ110 was used as dgsA+ wild-type control (as indicated by gray bars). JEK5 carries a dgsA deletion. JSW1 carries a dgsA deletion and a single wild-type copy of dgsA+ at a different position in the chromosome. JSW2 carries also a dgsA deletion and a single copy dgsA* gene encoding the Mlc*H86R super-repressor. All strains harbor the mtfA wild-type expression plasmid pTMByeeIs. Cells were grown in the absence (−) or presence of IPTG (+) and tested for their β-galactosidase activities, which are given in nmol per min and mg of total cell protein. All activities are mean values of at least three independent experiments with standard deviations.
To further characterize the MtfA interaction with Mlc*H86R in vitro, we purified the super-repressor and used it in an EMSA experiment with the ptsGop fragment. In accordance to the in vivo titration data and the results from the band-shift assays with the wild-type repressor, the addition of MtfA to the complex of Mlc*H86R with the ptsGop fragment led to a release of the operator DNA (Fig. 5b). This seemed to indicate that the inactivation mechanisms of Mlc by unphosphorylated EIIBGlc and MtfA differ significantly.
MtfA shows amino-peptidase activity. The MtfA crystal structure from Klebsiella pneumoniae was recently characterized (doi:10.2210/pdb3khi/pdb). A total of 76% of the amino acids are shared by MtfA of K. pneumoniae and E. coli MtfA. Analysis of the overall MtfA architecture revealed structural similarities to the zinc-dependent metalloprotease lethal factor (LF) of Bacillus anthracis or to the Mop protein, which is involved in the virulence of Vibrio cholerae (Q. Xu et al., unpublished data). Therefore, we tried to characterize the putative protease activity of E. coli MtfA. Since the natural target and the substrate specificity of MtfA are currently unknown, we made use of several relatively unspecific and artificial protease activity assays, which monitor the cleavage of peptide substrates fused to 4-nitroanilide. Originally, a 4-nitroanilide substrate was used to characterize the in vitro activity of LF from B. anthracis (30). Various different l-amino 4-nitroanilide derivatives were chosen to look for aminopeptidase activity as indicated. The greatest activity and specificity was observed for l-alanine fused to 4-nitroanilide, as shown in Fig. 7. Other artificial substrates (arginine, proline, or valine fused to 4-nitroanilide, respectively) were cleaved off with significantly lower activities. Moreover, l-glutamic-acid-4-nitroanilide as an acidic amino acid and substrates larger in size, such as l-alanine-l-alanine-l-alanine-4-nitronalide, were not cleaved at all (data not shown). Subsequently, hippuryl-l-phenylalanine and hippuryl-l-arginine were used to test for carboxypeptidase activity. Again, only very low activities were obtained for these artificial substrates. Furthermore, we tested FTC-casein, a substrate for many endopeptidases regarding proteolytic conversion by MtfA. In contrast to the artificial aminopeptidase substrates, we did not detect any protease activity after incubation of FTC-casein with purified MtfA (data not shown). These results suggest that MtfA is an amino- rather than a carboxy- or endo-peptidase. Since the highest efficiency of MtfA activity was monitored by cleaving off an amino acid from the artificial substrate l-alanine-p-nitroanilide, this substrate was used to further characterize the peptidase activity of MtfA. Subsequently, we tested several protease inhibitors. Addition of the chelators EDTA or phenanthroline significantly reduced the peptidase activity of MtfA, whereas the addition of other protease inhibitors (e.g., AEBSF) had much less effect. This finding is consistent with the idea that MtfA is a zinc-dependent protease. Addition of higher amounts of EDTA or phenanthroline caused an irreversible denaturation of MtfA, meaning that zinc-ions are absolutely required to stabilize the protein structure and keep it in solution. Furthermore, a lack of complete inhibition by the weaker chelator EDTA was previously also observed with other HExxH metalloproteases, such as PepN (4).
Fig 7.
Peptidase assays of purified MtfA with different substrates. The activity measurements were carried out as described in methods. For l-amino 4-nitroanilide substrates, activity was monitored by measuring the change of the optical density at 390 nm (ΔOD390) triggered by the release of 4-nitroanilide after cleavage. The specific activity (U/mg·min) was calculated. The highest cleavage rate was reached with l-alanine 4-nitroanilide as substrate and set as 100%. The typical activity level under the test conditions for this substrate was ∼9 mU per mg of protein and min. Lower activities were detected for l-arginine 4-nitroanilide as a basic amino acid or for other none polar amino acid substrates such as l-proline or l-valine fused to 4-nitroanilide. Glutamic-acid 4-nitroanilide as an acidic amino acid or alanine-alanine-alanine 4-nitroanilide (data not shown) could not be cleaved by MtfA. Substrates for carboxypeptidase were also investigated. Neither hippuryl-arginine nor hippuryl-l-phenylalanine was cleaved sufficiently by MtfA. The cleavage of l-alanine 4-nitroanilide was not strongly inhibited by the protease inhibitor AEBSF. In contrast, the chelator reagents EDTA and phenanthroline reduced proteolytic activity severely since it is shown in the last three columns. All activities are given in percentages relative to the cleavage of l-alanine 4-nitroanilide. The data are mean values of three independent experiments with standard deviations.
Aminopeptidase activities of MtfA mutants.
In the next step, we examined the collection of MtfA mutants for their amino-peptidase activities. All mutants were purified and tested for their ability to cleave off the alanine residue from the l-alanine-p-nitroanilide substrate. Freshly prepared, wild-type MtfA protein was always taken as a control and set to 100%. The results for all MtfA derivatives are given in Fig. 8. Mutants with substitutions at positions H149, E150, H153 (HExxH motif), or E212 displayed clearly reduced protease activities probably due to the fact that the coordination of the zinc ion, the overall conformation of the protein, and thus the catalytic activity were affected. With respect to the histidine residues 149 and 153 and their involvement in zinc coordination, a substitution for lysine led to a stronger effect than a replacement by glutamine. A triple mutant with replacements (by alanine) of all three functionally important residues of the HExxH motif was insoluble and could not further be analyzed (data not shown). Substantial changes in the proteolytic activities were also observed for mutants with substitutions of the two glutamate residues at positions 150 and 212. On the basis of the crystal structure of MtfA from Klebsiella pneumoniae (MtfAKpn), one would expect these residues to be involved in catalysis. The substitution E150Q influenced the protease activity most significantly. In contrast, as shown in Fig. 3, the replacement of this residue with aspartic acid or glutamine, respectively, did not affect Mlc binding in vivo. Moreover, as illustrated in Fig. 5c and d, purified MtfAE150D or MtfAE150Q proteins are still capable of causing a release of the ptsGop fragment in a band-shift assay with purified Mlc in vitro. These results demonstrate that the two MtfA functions of Mlc binding and proteolysis are clearly distinct from one another. Other substitutions that led to reduced proteolytic activities but retained Mlc binding include Y94S and P225S. MtfA derivatives with the substitutions S142F, D156N, A207D, V216D, or Y243S, respectively, exhibited both reduced enzyme activity and reduced Mlc binding, which might indicate severe changes in structure and function. Furthermore, replacements of the residues isoleucine 148 with glutamic acid and alanine 215 with aspartic acid resulted in protein instability. Thus, the reduced activities of MtfAI148Y and MtfAA215S may also be caused by enhanced protein degradation.
Fig 8.
Protease activity of MtfA wild type and defined MtfA mutants. MtfA and defined mutants (as indicated) were purified and the aminopeptidase activities toward the cleavage of l-alanine 4-nitroanilde were monitored. Each activity was calculated and is diagrammed relative to the activity of the MtfA wild-type protein, which was analyzed in parallel. Wild-type activity, which was typically ∼9 mU per mg of protein and min was set to 100% and is presented by the gray bars. The activities of mutant proteins, which showed >80% wild-type activity, are shown by the white columns. In contrast, the black columns represent MtfA derivatives, which showed <80% wild-type proteolytic activity. The MtfA derivative 149/150/153/212 carries the substitutions H149K/E150Q/H153K/E212Q. Standard deviations and average values of at least three independent experiments are indicated.
Mlc influences protease activity.
The results described above raised the question as to whether Mlc is a substrate for MtfA or whether it has an influence on its protease activity. Therefore, purified MtfA and Mlc were incubated together in a ratio of 1 to 2 (MtfA is known to form dimers, Mlc to form tetramers) and tested for aminopeptidase activity. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the addition of amino-terminal His-tagged Mlc to the standard assay led to an increased proteolytic activity. The effect was even more severe with untagged Mlc. The addition of equal amounts of BSA caused no significant effect. The mutant protein MtfAN145D, which displayed a reduced interaction with Mlc in vivo (Fig. 3) but almost wild-type proteolytic activity (Fig. 8), was significantly less stimulated by His-tagged Mlc. The presence of some stimulation may have been caused by the in vitro test conditions, which required high amounts of purified protein. Regardless, Mlc can clearly be excluded as a biologically relevant substrate.
Fig 9.
Protease activities of MtfA wild type and MtfAN145D in the absence or presence of Mlc. The cleavage efficiency of l-alanine 4-nitroanilide by MtfA or MtfAN145D was assayed in the presence or absence of Mlc as indicated. Control samples were carried out incubating MtfA either without any supplements or with accessory BSA. The addition of purified Mlc with an amino-terminal His-tagged or addition of an untagged Mlc version stimulated MtfA enzyme activity up to 175%. In contrast, the MtfA derivative N145D with reduced Mlc binding capacity was only stimulated to 123% of the wild-type activity. Activity values are averages of at least three independent experiments with standard deviations.
DISCUSSION
In Escherichia coli K-12, one of the best-studied model organisms, the function of many putative open reading frames remains unknown. These had included mtfA (formerly yeeI), despite the fact that identification of orthologs of the E. coli mtfA gene in more than 100 proteobacteria of the alpha, beta, and gamma subdivisions have implied an important function of this protein. Using surface plasmon resonance assays, we were able to demonstrate in an earlier study that MtfA binds with high affinity to the glucose repressor Mlc (2). Moreover, we could demonstrate that MtfA binds specifically to the carboxy-terminal segment of Mlc, which is usually involved in protein tetramerization. In this manner, MtfA among other factors, seems to play an important role in the regulation of the glucose-PTS. In turn, the glucose-PTS has an important function in the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in E. coli. Mlc, for example, not only regulates ptsG gene expression but is also a signal mediator for glucose induction of the ptsHI-crr operon (20, 29, 34), the malT gene for the transcriptional activator of the maltose regulon (6), the manXYZ operon for the mannose-PTS (18), and enzymes involved in glycolysis (5), respectively. Interestingly, DNA-binding activity of Mlc in E. coli is not regulated by a small molecular inducer. Instead, Mlc is inactivated by binding to the dephosphorylated EIIBGlc domain of the EIICBGlc during glucose transport (13, 16, 28, 34). The localization of EIIBGlc at the membrane appears to be essential for this kind of inactivation mechanism (27), since overproduction of the liberated soluble EIIBGlc domain does not lead to Mlc inactivation (13, 34), although unphosphorylated EIIBGlc alone binds to Mlc, as shown in surface plasmon resonance assays (16). In contrast, membrane-bound fusion proteins consisting of the EIIBGlc domain in combination with either the lactose permease LacY (27) or the bacteriophage M13 membrane coat protein Gp8 (26) are perfectly able to sequester Mlc. Thus, binding of EIIBGlc to Mlc might either not cause any conformational change of the repressor, or there might be no similar conformational change as caused by MtfA binding. Instead, by anchoring the Mlc tetramer to the membrane via EIICBGlc, the structural flexibility of Mlc monomers within the complex becomes restricted, which seems to be responsible for the loss of its DNA-binding activity (17). Crystal structure analysis of E. coli Mlc (25) revealed the existence of three functional domains: the amino-terminal part containing the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif (D domain), an oligomerization domain from residues 195 to 380 (O domain), and an inner EIIBGlc binding domain (E domain). There appears to be only weak interactions between the three domains and in particular the O domain is separated from the residual protein by a highly flexible hinge. However, structural rearrangements of the O domain remotely affect the conformation of the DNA-binding domain by an unknown mechanism (17). In contrast to EIIBGlc, inactivation of Mlc by MtfA occurs in the cytosol and is not membrane dependent (2). Tanaka et al. (27) isolated an Mlc super-repressor, which carries an H86R amino acid substitution. According to the domain model, Mlc*H86R cannot be inactivated by EIICBGlc. In the present study we could demonstrate that MtfA is still able to bind and inactivate Mlc*H86R both in vivo and in vitro. This clearly supports the notion that MtfA-Mlc interaction de facto occurs at the C domain of Mlc, which may, in contrast to the EIIBGlc-Mlc interaction, result in either severe changes in the conformation of the D domain or the prevention of repressor oligomerization. Both mechanisms would affect the DNA-binding activity of Mlc. Both the presence of a ternary complex in vivo and that of cooperative binding effects remain uncertain and thus are areas in need of further elucidation.
Using systematic site-directed mutagenesis of conserved amino acid residues in MtfA and subsequent in vivo activity assays, we identified an Mlc interaction domain within the carboxy-terminal part of MtfA. The results of in vivo phenotyping of the interaction between MtfA and its derivatives with Mlc led to the conclusion that amino acids from residue 132 onward appear to be necessary for this interaction. Further experiments using a bacterial two-hybrid assay have also supported this idea. However, two amino acid substitutions (L40E and A70D) in the amino terminus also caused a significant reduction in Mlc titration, whereas conserved exchanges at these two positions had no effect. This might indicate that there are two classes of amino acid substitution that affect Mlc binding: substitutions of the first class disturb the overall conformation of MtfA, whereas substitutions of the second class directly affect the MtfA-Mlc interaction.
Recently, the crystal structure of MtfA from Klebsiella pneumoniae (MtfAKpn) was characterized at the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (doi:10.2210/pdb3khi/pdb). A projection of the MtfAEc sequence onto the MtfAKpn structure revealed that at least eight of the identified amino acid residues in the carboxy terminus are exposed on the surface of MtfA. Furthermore, these residues are clearly clustered at one side of the protein (Fig. 10). Thus, it is highly likely that these residues are directly involved in Mlc binding. In contrast, other residues such as L40 or A70 are almost or completely buried inside the protein.
Fig 10.
Projected MtfAEc protein structure. We used the POLYVIEW-3D web-based tool (http://polyview.cchmc.org/polyview3d.html [22]) for molecular structure visualization of MtfAKpn. The positions of amino acid residues 132, 142, 145, 149, 153, 205, 207, 216, and 219 are indicated in red color.
The MtfAKpn structure revealed overall similarities to the zinc-dependent metalloprotease Lethal Factor (LF) from Bacillus anthracis as well as other metalloproteases in the gluzincin clan. Furthermore, we previously confirmed the presence of proteolytic activity of the MtfAKpn protein and the existence of the artificial substrate l-alanine 4-nitroanilide (Xu et al., unpublished). In the present study, we were able to demonstrate a similar activity for the E. coli protein. With an assortment of MtfA derivatives, our results support the notion of MtfA as a metal-dependent protease. Single substitutions of amino acids involved in zinc coordination or catalysis of the substrate show, as deduced from the structure, significantly reduced in vitro activities. An MtfA mutant with a triple substitution at positions 149, 150, and 153 (zinc coordination residues) for alanine, could not be investigated in vitro, suggesting a structural instability of the residual protein without the metal ion. Further analysis to identify a metal-bound and metal-unbound state by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry failed due to irreversible unfolding of MtfA at low pH conditions. However, once again this result points to a metal-dependent peptidase activity of MtfA.
These findings now raise questions about the biological relevance of the MtfA-Mlc interaction. Mlc is clearly not a target protein. On the contrary, addition of Mlc stimulates MtfA amino-peptidase activity. Preliminary analysis of the MtfKpn structure revealed the existence of a self-inhibitory complex (Xu et al., unpublished data). It is tempting to speculate that Mlc binding causes a conformational change in MtfA, which may override self-inhibition. Transcriptome analysis by Lemuth (14) under glucose limitation revealed a significant upregulation of mtfA expression under growth conditions during the transition from the exponential to the stationary phase. According to the Mlc regulation model, running out of glucose would lead to a rephosphorylation of EIICBGlc and thus to a release of Mlc into the cytoplasm. Both effects would boost the overall MtfA protease activity at this growth transition point. This leads to a model according to which the glucose sensor Mlc/EIICBGlc not only controls gene expression by Mlc, but that at least in E. coli it also regulates the proteolytic activity of MtfA in a glucose-dependent manner. This reflects a novel regulatory output signal by the glucose-PTS.
Questions still remain regarding which proteins are natural targets for MtfA. For example, the structurally related endopeptidase LF of B. subtilis cleaves off the amino-terminal peptides of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKKs) during host infections (9, 31). It is tempting to speculate that MtfA also may cleave off short peptides from its natural target proteins rather than working just as an aminopeptidase. In a series of unspecific cross-linking experiments to identify further interaction partners of MtfA, several putative target proteins were identified (unpublished results). Among others, the γ-subunit of the ATP synthase was identified four times by five screening approaches under different conditions. Variations in the number of ATP synthase complexes might be necessary for growth adaptation under changing environmental conditions, making the γ-subunit a promising target candidate of MtfA.
In conclusion, by elucidating that MtfA is a glucose-regulated peptidase, we have identified a novel regulatory output mechanism of the glucose-PTS, which may be involved in the adaptation of E. coli cells during the transition from the glucose phase to the next consecutive growth phase. Since the physiologically relevant target is not yet known, further investigation is necessary.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge Kurt Schmid, Hans-Peter Schmitz, Katja Bettenbrock, Gabriele Deckers-Hebestreit, Karin Lemuth, Qingping Xu, and Jürgen Heinisch for helpful discussions; Katrin Fänger for excellent technical support; and Lucille Schmieding and Jennifer Manne for help with the manuscript.
This study was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the “Sonderforschungsbereich” 431 (Teilprojekt P14 to K.J.) and by the German Ministry of Education and Research through the FORSYS-program (grant FKZ 0315285C to K.J.).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 16 December 2011
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ausubel FM, et al. 2004. Current protocols in molecular biology. Green Publishing and Wiley Interscience, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
- 2. Becker AK, et al. 2006. YeeI, a novel protein involved in modulation of the activity of the glucose-phosphotransferase system in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 188:5439–5449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Böhm A, Boos W. 2004. Gene regulation in prokaryotes by subcellular relocalization of transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:151–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chandu D, Kumar A, Nandi D. 2003. PepN, the major Suc-LLVY-AMC-hydrolyzing enzyme in Escherichia coli, displays functional similarity with downstream processing enzymes in Archaea and Eukarya. Implications in cytosolic protein degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:5548–5556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Charpentier B, Bardey V, Robas N, Branlant C. 1998. The EIIGlc protein is involved in glucose-mediated activation of Escherichia coli gapA and gapB-pgk transcription. J. Bacteriol. 180:6476–6483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Decker K, Plumbridge J, Boos W. 1998. Negative transcriptional regulation of a positive regulator: the expression of malT, encoding the transcriptional activator of the maltose regulon of Escherichia coli, is negatively controlled by Mlc. Mol. Microbiol. 27:381–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW. 2006. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:939–1031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dmitrova M, et al. 1998. A new LexA-based genetic system for monitoring and analyzing protein heterodimerization in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:205–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Duesbery NS, et al. 1998. Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. Science 280:734–737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gabor E, et al. 2011. The phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent glucose-phosphotransferase system from Escherichia coli K-12 as the center of a network regulating carbohydrate flux in the cell. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 90:711–720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hochhut B, Jahreis K, Lengeler JW, Schmid K. 1997. CTnscr94, a conjugative transposon found in enterobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 179:2097–2102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jahreis K, Pimentel-Schmitt EF, Bruckner R, Titgemeyer F. 2008. Ins and outs of glucose transport systems in eubacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32:891–907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lee SJ, Boos W, Bouche JP, Plumbridge J. 2000. Signal transduction between a membrane-bound transporter, PtsG, and a soluble transcription factor, Mlc, of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 19:5353–5361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lemuth K. 2006. Transcription analysis of Escherichia coli during carbon limitation using DNA microarrays.University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany: http:://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/./Diss_End_KarinLemuth.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lengeler JW, Jahreis K. 2009. Bacterial PEP-dependent carbohydrate: phosphotransferase systems couple sensing and global control mechanisms. Contrib. Microbiol. 16:65–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Nam TW, et al. 2001. The Escherichia coli glucose transporter enzyme IICB(Glc) recruits the global repressor Mlc. EMBO J. 20:491–498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nam TW, et al. 2008. Analyses of Mlc-IIBGlc interaction and a plausible molecular mechanism of Mlc inactivation by membrane sequestration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:3751–3756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Plumbridge J. 1998. Control of the expression of the manXYZ operon in Escherichia coli: Mlc is a negative regulator of the mannose PTS. Mol. Microbiol. 27:369–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Plumbridge J. 2001. DNA binding sites for the Mlc and NagC proteins: regulation of nagE, encoding the N-acetylglucosamine-specific transporter in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:506–514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Plumbridge J. 1999. Expression of the phosphotransferase system both mediates and is mediated by Mlc regulation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 33:260–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Plumbridge J. 2000. A mutation which affects both the specificity of PtsG sugar transport and the regulation of ptsG expression by Mlc in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 146:2655–2663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Porollo A, Meller J. 2007. Versatile annotation and publication quality visualization of protein complexes using POLYVIEW-3D. BMC Bioinformatics 8:316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Postma L, Jacobson 1993. Phosphoenolypyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase systems in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 57:543–594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Saiki RK, et al. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schiefner A, et al. 2005. The crystal structure of Mlc, a global regulator of sugar metabolism in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 280:29073–29079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Seitz S, Lee SJ, Pennetier C, Boos W, Plumbridge J. 2003. Analysis of the interaction between the global regulator Mlc and EIIBGlc of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 278:10744–10751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tanaka Y, Itoh F, Kimata K, Aiba H. 2004. Membrane localization itself but not binding to IICB is directly responsible for the inactivation of the global repressor Mlc in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 53:941–951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tanaka Y, Kimata K, Aiba H. 2000. A novel regulatory role of glucose transporter of Escherichia coli: membrane sequestration of a global repressor Mlc. EMBO J. 19:5344–5352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tanaka Y, Kimata K, Inada T, Tagami H, Aiba H. 1999. Negative regulation of the pts operon by Mlc: mechanism underlying glucose induction in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 4:391–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tonello F, Seveso M, Marin O, Mock M, Montecucco C. 2002. Screening inhibitors of anthrax lethal factor. Nature 418:386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Vitale G, et al. 1998. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves the N terminus of MAPKKs and induces tyrosine/threonine phosphorylation of MAPKs in cultured macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248:706–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wadler CS, Vanderpool CK. 2009. Characterization of homologs of the small RNA SgrS reveals diversity in function. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:5477–5485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zeppenfeld T, Larisch C, Lengeler JW, Jahreis K. 2000. Glucose transporter mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 with changes in substrate recognition of IICB(Glc) and induction behavior of the ptsG gene. J. Bacteriol. 182:4443–4452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.










