Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Mar;194(5):1271–1272. doi: 10.1128/JB.06759-11

Complete Genome Sequence of the Beer Spoilage Organism Pediococcus claussenii ATCC BAA-344T

Vanessa Pittet a, Teju Abegunde b, Travis Marfleet a, Monique Haakensen a,*, Kendra Morrow a, Teenus Jayaprakash b, Kristen Schroeder a, Brett Trost b, Sydney Byrns a, Jordyn Bergsveinson a, Anthony Kusalik b, Barry Ziola a,
PMCID: PMC3294761  PMID: 22328764

Abstract

Pediococcus claussenii is a common brewery contaminant. We have sequenced the chromosome and plasmids of the type strain P. claussenii ATCC BAA-344. A ropy variant was chosen for sequencing to obtain genetic information related to growth in beer, as well as exopolysaccharide and possibly biofilm formation by this organism.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacilli and pediococcal isolates are frequently found as brewery contaminants. Growth of these bacteria in beer results in a turbid and unpalatable (i.e., spoiled) product, causing economic losses for brewers. As the ability to grow in beer is not a species-conserved trait (7), identification of beer-spoiling isolates is difficult. An understanding of the genetics that allow given isolates of a species to grow in beer is therefore needed to accurately predict the spoilage potential of these organisms when found in a brewery.

Pediococcus claussenii is a common beer spoilage organism (2). The type strain (ATCC BAA-344), which we sequenced, produces exopolysaccharide (referred to as rope, or slime), which may be involved in biofilm formation and persistence in a brewery. This bacterium spoils beer in 7 to 8 days and contains the known beer spoilage-associated gene horA (7). Ethanol tolerance for lactic acid bacteria is midrange (9), and hops resistance is high (V. Pittet, B. R. Bushell, and B. Ziola, unpublished data).

Sequencing was done using ABI 3730xl (6× coverage) and Illumina Solexa 1G (250× coverage) sequencing platforms. Sixteen million paired Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet (13). The resulting 1,757 contigs were combined with 1,500 fosmid and 14,600 plasmid Sanger reads (paired), and assembled using Phred/Phrap/Consed (3, 4, 5). The resulting 56 contigs were then validated and visualized using amosvalidate and Hawkeye, respectively (8, 12). Read pair data were used to order and orient contigs, and gaps were closed by ABI 3730xl sequencing of PCR amplicons. The genome consists of the bacterial chromosome (1,829,111 bp) and eight plasmids (pPECL-1 [1,815 bp], pPECL-2 [2,450 bp], pPECL-3 [17,830 bp], pPECL-4 [23,136 bp], pPECL-5 [36,338 bp], pPECL-6 [18,800 bp], pPECL-7 [16,067 bp], and pPECL-8 [currently 20,815 bp]). The sixth and seventh plasmids were not circularized due to repetitive transposon regions found in both plasmids, making PCR-based gap closing very difficult. Efforts to complete the eighth plasmid are ongoing. The overall G+C content of the genome is 36.8%, whereas that of the plasmids ranges from 34.9% to 42.5%.

Annotation was done using combined results from RAST (1) and the Institute for Genome Sciences Annotation Engine and manual annotation tool Manatee. The results predicted 1,740 coding sequences (CDS), 57 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA operons in the chromosome and 129 CDS in the plasmids (2, 2, 20, 16, 35, 21, 15, and currently 18 CDS for plasmids 1 to 8, respectively). Approximately 30 genes are related to mobile elements (e.g., phage and transposons); however, no CRISPR locations were predicted (6). Interestingly, as in Lactobacillus reuteri, all genes required for synthesis of vitamin B12 are present (11). From the point of view of beer spoilage, several genes are of interest, including the already-known hops resistance gene horA (10), found on pPECL_8. As additional genome sequences from beer-spoiling bacteria become available, genomic comparisons will help elucidate the mechanisms by which these organisms grow in beer, with the end application for breweries being the rapid detection of contaminants.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The P. claussenii ATCC BAA-344T sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers CP003137, CP003138, CP003139, CP003140, CP003141, CP003142, CP003143, CP003144, and CP003145 for the chromosome and plasmids 1 to 8, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Genome sequencing was done at the Genome Sciences Centre at the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, with follow-up PCR amplicon sequencing done at the Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. The Institute for Genome Sciences at the University of Maryland School of Medicine performed the annotation via their Annotation Engine Pipeline.

V.P. and B.T. were holders of Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Canada Graduate Scholarships, and V.P. was awarded the Anheuser-Busch InBev, the Brian Williams, and the MillerCoors Graduate Student Scholarships from the American Society of Brewing Chemists Foundation. T.A. held a University of Saskatchewan College of Graduate Studies and Research Equity Scholarship. M.H. was awarded the Coors Brewing Company and Cargill Malt Scholarships from the American Society of Brewing Chemists Foundation and was the recipient of graduate scholarships from the College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan. NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Awards were held by K.M. and S.B., and K.S. was the holder of a College of Medicine Biomedical Undergraduate Summer Research Program Scholarship. This research was supported by MillerCoors Brewing Company, Golden, CO, and NSERC Discovery Grants 24067 (B.Z.) and 37207 (A.K.).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Aziz RK, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dobson CM, et al. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Pediococcus, including Pediococcus claussenii sp. nov., a novel lactic acid bacterium isolated from beer. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:2003–2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ewing B, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8:186–194 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175–185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:W52–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Haakensen M, Schubert A, Ziola B. 2008. Multiplex PCR for putative Lactobacillus and Pediococcus beer-spoilage genes and ability of gene presence to predict growth in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:63–70 [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Pop M. 2008. Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly. Genome Biol. 9:R55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pittet V, Morrow K, Ziola B. 2011. Ethanol tolerance of lactic acid bacteria, including relevance of the exopolysaccharide gene gtf. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 69:57–61 [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sakamoto K, Margolles A, van Veen HW, Konings WN. 2001. Hop resistance in the beer spoilage bacterium Lactobacillus brevis is mediated by the ATP-binding cassette multidrug transporter HorA. J. Bacteriol. 183:5371–5375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Santos F, et al. 2008. The complete coenzyme B12 biosynthesis gene cluster of Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098. Microbiology 154:81–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Schatz MC, Phillippy AM, Shneiderman B, Salzberg SL. 2007. Hawkeye: an interactive visual analytics tool for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 8:R34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES