Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2012 Mar;50(3):1079–1081. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06214-11

Human Papillomavirus Type-Specific Prevalence in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasm in Western China

Jinke Li a,, Jie Mei b, Xuedong Wang c, Lina Hu d, Yong Lin e, Pei Yang a,
PMCID: PMC3295087  PMID: 22170939

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) type-specific prevalence was studied in 600 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm in western China by GenoArray test. HPV-16 and -58 were the most prevalent types, with prevalences of 37.8% and 21.8%, respectively. HPV-18 and -45 were uncommon types. The results show different type distributions from that of other regions, which is important evidence for the selection of future genotypes in HPV vaccines in western China.

TEXT

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies that affect women worldwide. It is developed from a series of precancerous lesions called cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN; graded from 1 to 3). Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the most important risk factor for cervical cancer development, can be detected in over 95% of carcinoma tissues (10). More than 100 different HPV genotypes are sequenced, of which about 15 types are called high-risk HPV because of their strong carcinogenic potentials (12). One important approach to prevent cervical cancer and CIN is the prevention of HPV infection by prophylactic vaccination. The currently available HPV vaccines are mainly against HPV-16 and -18 types, since they are the most important genotypes globally (7). However, HPV genotype prevalence varies in different countries or regions. In a previous study, we reported a high prevalence of HPV-16 and -58 in cervical carcinoma patients in western China, suggesting HPV genotype distribution may be quite different from other regions in the world (8). In the present study, we further investigated HPV type-specific prevalence in CIN lesions in a much larger patient population.

A total of 600 histologically diagnosed patients with CIN (CIN1, 143 cases; CIN2, 181 cases; and CIN3, 276 cases) were included. These patients visited West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, one of the largest medical centers in western China, from January 2010 to March 2011. The histological diagnosis was verified by two independent pathologists who were blinded of the HPV status. Cast-off cells were scraped from cervical lesions by using plastic swabs and stored in physiological saline at 4°C until further use. Cervical samples were used for HPV DNA detection and genotyping by GenoArray test (Hybribio Limited, Hong Kong, China) as described previously (9). This kit can simultaneously identify 21 HPV genotypes, including 7 low-risk types (types 6, 11, 42, 43, 44, 53, and 81) and 14 high-risk genotypes (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68). Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used, and P values of <0.05 were considered significant. The attributable fraction of each genotype was estimated, and 95% confidential intervals (CI) were calculated as described before (6).

In the 600 CIN patients, the overall HPV infection rate was 80.8%, while that of the high-risk HPV type was 75.8%. As for the types, HPV-16 was the one most frequently found, with a prevalence of 37.8% and an attributable fraction of 34.2%. HPV-58 was the second most common genotype, which was detected in 21.8% of CIN patients and had an attributable fraction of 17.7%. Other common high-risk types include HPV-52, -33, and –31, with prevalences of 13.2%, 7.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. The attributable fractions of these types were 8.1%, 5.4%, and 3.0%, respectively. HPV-18, -68, -51, -39, -66, -59, -35, and -45 were uncommon high-risk types with attribution under 3%. Low-risk types, such as HPV-11, -53, -81, -6, and -42 were also detected in CIN patients; however, the prevalence was relatively low (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

HPV genotype prevalence and attributable fraction in 600 cases of CIN patients in western China. The 95% confidential interval of each HPV attribution was calculated.

The overall HPV infection rates were 59.4%, 82.3%, and 90.9% for CIN1, CIN2, and CIN3, respectively (χ2 = 7.53, P < 0.001), while high-risk HPV infection rates were 51%, 75.1%, and 89.1%, respectively (χ2 = 8.54, P < 0.001). The result shows an association between grades of lesions and HPV infection, especially high-risk HPV infection. When type-specific HPV prevalence was analyzed, HPV-16 and HPV-58 were mostly related to the grade of CIN. HPV-16 infection rates were 16.1%, 30.4%, and 54.0% for CIN1, -2, and -3, respectively (χ2 = 7.91, P < 0.001), while HPV-58 was detected in 14.0%, 21.5%, and 26.1% of CIN1, -2, and -3, respectively (χ2 = 2.82, P < 0.003). HPV-33 prevalence was also related to the CIN grade (χ2 = 2.93, P < 0.002). All the other high-risk genotypes or low-risk types exerted the similar increasing trend among the CIN lesions (Table 1).

Table 1.

HPV genotype distributions in women with different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN)

HPV DNA or genotype No. (%) of infections
CIN1 (n = 143)
CIN2 (n = 181)
CIN3 (n = 276)
Single and/or in concurrence with other HPV genotypes Single infection Single and/or in concurrence with other HPV genotypes Single infection Single and/or in concurrence with other HPV genotypes Single genotype infection
HPV DNA 85 (59.4) 149 (82.3) 251 (90.9)
HR-HPV DNA 73 (51.0) 136 (75.1) 246 (89.1)
HPV-16 23 (16.1)b 11 (7.7) 55 (30.4) 35 (19.3) 149 (54.0) 107 (38.8)
HPV-58 20 (14.0)c 12 (8.4) 39 (21.5) 25 (13.8) 76 (26.1) 37 (13.4)
HPV-52 24 (16.8) 9 (6.3) 33 (18.2) 15 (8.3) 22 (8.0) 8 (2.9)
HPV-33 5 (3.5)d 3 (2.1) 11 (6.1) 6 (3.3) 31 (11.2) 16 (5.8)
HPV-18 4 (2.8) 2 (1.4) 11 (6.1) 4 (2.2) 12 (4.3) 3 (1.1)
HPV-68 5 (3.5) 2 (1.4) 3 (1.7) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.1) 0
HPV-53a 7 (4.9) 2 (1.4) 6 (3.3) 1 (0.6) 4 (1.4) 0
HPV-31 4 (2.8) 2 (1.4) 12 (6.6) 8 (4.45) 18 (6.5) 2 (0.7)
HPV-66 5 (3.5) 2 (1.4) 1 (0.6) 0 1 (0.4) 1 (0.4)
HPV-11a 5 (3.5) 3 (2.1) 11 (6.1) 7 (3.9) 5 (1.8) 2 (0.7)
HPV-42a 2 (1.4) 0 0 0 1 (0.4) 0
HPV-59 0 0 4 (2.2) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.1) 1 (0.4)
HPV-6a 5 (3.5) 3 (2.1) 4 (2.2) 1 (0.6) 2 (0.7) 2 (0.7)
HPV-51 2 (1.4) 1 (0.7) 0 0 1 (0.4) 0
HPV-35 1 (0.7) 0 1 (0.6) 0 1 (0.4) 0
HPV-39 2 (1.4) 0 5 (2.8) 0 1 (0.4) 0
HPV-45 0 0 0 0 3 (1.1) 2 (0.7)
HPV-81a 6 (4.2) 1 (0.7) 5 (2.8) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.4) 0
a

Low-risk types.

b

χ2 = 7.91, P < 0.001, Cochran-Armitage trend test.

c

χ2 = 2.82, P < 0.003, Cochran-Armitage trend test.

d

χ2 = 2.93, P < 0.002, Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Globally, HPV-16 and -18 are the most oncogenic genotypes, which were associated with over 70% of invasive carcinoma, 50% of high-grade lesions (CIN2/3), and 35% of low-grade lesions (CIN1) (5, 11). HPV-45 is the third most common genotype, which is associated with 5% of the squamous cervical cancers, 2.5% of CIN2/3 lesions, and 5% of CIN1 (5, 11). HPV-58 was reported to be a rare genotype. However, to our knowledge, HPV-58 was detected more frequently in some areas of China, supporting diversified and geographic variations of HPV distribution (14). Our recent study found that HPV-58 was the second most prevalent genotype in cervical carcinoma in western China (8). In the present study, we further verified that in this area, HPV-58 is the second most prevalent genotype in CIN patients, which could be detected in over one-fifth of CIN lesions. In addition, 17.7% of CIN lesions were attributed to HPV-58 infections. HPV-16 is the most prevalent type, unsurprisingly. HPV-18 is less common, with the attribution under 3%. HPV-45, the third most commonly prevalent genotype in the worldwide scope, is extremely scarce in CIN patients in western China. Thus, in the area with high HPV-58 attribution, inclusion of HPV-58 should be considered in prioritization of HPV types in future vaccines (2).

In summary, our study demonstrates a high prevalence of HPV-16 and -58, but not HPV-18 and -45, in cervical precancerous lesions in western China, suggesting an important role of the two HPV genotypes in cervical cancer development in this area. What we have found may provide important evidence for the selection of future genotypes in HPV vaccines in western China.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 14 December 2011

REFERENCES

  • 1. Cai HB, Ding XH, Chen CC. 2009. Prevalence of single and multiple human papillomavirus types in cervical cancer and precursor lesions in Hubei, China. Oncology 76:157–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chan PK, et al. 30 August 2011. Attribution of human papillomavirus types to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancers in Southern China. Int. J. Cancer. [Epub ahead of print.]. doi:10.1002/ijc.26404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chan PK, et al. 2009. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in cervical cancers in Hong Kong: current situation and changes over the last decades. Int. J. Cancer 125:1671–1677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chao A, et al. 2011. Human papillomavirus genotype in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 of Taiwanese women. Int. J. Cancer 128:653–659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Clifford GM, et al. 2005. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in low-grade cervical lesions: comparison by geographic region and with cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14:1157–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Insinga RP, Liaw KL, Johnson LG, Madeleine MM. 2008. A systematic review of the prevalence and attribution of human papillomavirus types among cervical, vaginal, and vulvar precancers and cancers in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17:1611–1622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jenkins D. 2008. A review of cross-protection against oncogenic HPV by an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine: importance of virological and clinical endpoints and implications for mass vaccination in cervical cancer prevention. Gynecol. Oncol. 110(Suppl 1):S18–S25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li J, et al. 2011. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus in women with cervical cancer or high-grade precancerous lesions in Chengdu, western China. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 112:131–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Liu SS, Leung RC, Chan KK, Cheung AN, Ngan HY. 2010. Evaluation of a newly developed GenoArray human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay and comparison with the Roche linear array HPV genotyping assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:758–764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lowy DR, Solomon D, Hildesheim A, Schiller JT, Schiffman M. 2008. Human papillomavirus infection and the primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Cancer 113(Suppl7):1980–1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Smith JS, et al. 2007. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int. J. Cancer 121:621–632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zheng ZM, Baker CC. 2006. Papillomavirus genome structure, expression, and post-transcriptional regulation. Front. Biosci. 11:2286–2302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES