Abstract
Hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the most common causes of death in patients with chronic liver disease. Chronic liver injury of virtually any etiology triggers inflammatory and wound healing responses that in the long run promote the development of hepatic fibrosis and HCC. Here, we review the role of the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), a master regulator of inflammation and cell death, in the development of hepatocellular injury, liver fibrosis and HCC, with a particular focus on the role of NF-κB in different cellular compartments of the liver. We propose that NF-κB acts as a central link between hepatic injury, fibrosis and HCC, and that it may represent a target for the prevention or treatment of liver fibrosis and HCC. However, NF-κB acts as a two-edged sword and inhibition of NF-κB may not only exert beneficial effects but also negatively impact hepatocyte viability, especially when NF-κB inhibition is pronounced. Finding appropriate targets or identifying drugs that either exert only a moderate effect on NFκB activity or that can be specifically delivered to nonparenchymal cells will be essential to avoid the increase in liver injury associated with complete NF-κB blockade in hepatocytes.
Introduction
Inflammation is an integral part of the hepatic wound-healing response to injury induced by alcohol, hepatitis viruses, excess fat and cholestasis. While inflammation may be beneficial in the short term (for example by promoting regeneration after massive liver injury or inducing immune responses that lead to the eradication of pathogens), chronic inflammation and the associated regenerative wound-healing response are strongly linked to the development of fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As >80% of HCCs arise in patients with hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis,1 it appears that the chronic wound-healing process in the liver is an essential contributor to hepatocarcinogenesis, and that HCC as the final stage of this process truly represents ‘a wound that never heals’. In the progression through the various stages of liver disease, inflammation seems to be the key promoter that drives this maladaptive wound-healing response.
It is commonly believed that during carcinogenesis genetic alterations are the ‘match that lights the fire’ and inflammation the ‘fuel that feeds the flames’. However, chronic hepatic injury is sufficient to induce both tumor initiation and promotion, via replication-induced mutations and chronic inflammation. In the past 10 years, a number of inflammatory mediators have been shown to contribute to the progression of chronic liver disease,2–7 many of which are either targets or activators of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). NF-κB is a key transcriptional regulator of the inflammatory response,8–10 and plays an essential role in the regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways in the liver. First, NF-κB is activated in virtually every chronic liver disease, including alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), viral hepatitis and biliary liver disease.11–17 Second, NF-κB regulates multiple essential functions in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) as outlined below. Third, genetic inactivation of different NFκB signaling components results in liver phenotypes that include spontaneous injury, fibrosis and carcinogenesis suggesting that NF-κB makes an essential contribution to liver homeostasis and wound-healing processes.18–21
Here we review the contribution of NF-κB to chronic liver disease, with a particular focus on the role of NF-κB in different hepatic cell compartments and its effects on chronic inflammation and fibrosis as events that set the stage for the development of HCC. We support the hypothesis that the effects of NF-κB on hepatocarcinogenesis strongly depend on the cell type and the degree of NF-κB activation or inhibition. Activation of NF-κB in non-parenchymal cells generally promotes inflammation, fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis, whereas suppression of NF-κB activation in parenchymal cells promotes hepatocarcinogenesis in some settings and inhibits hepatocarcinogenesis in others.
The NF-κB transcription factor family
The NF-κB signaling pathway is a highly conserved evolutionary pathway, with key functions in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses, as first demonstrated in Drosophila melanogaster and subsequently in mammals.10 NF-κB is composed as a heterodimer or homodimer of various members of the Rel family of DNA-binding proteins, and regulates the transcription of genes that contain κB binding sites. The human NF-κB family consists of five cellular DNA-binding subunits: p50, p52, cRel, p65 (also called RelA) and RelB, encoded by NFKB1, NFKB2, REL, RELA and RELB, respectively (Table 1).10 The DNA-binding subunits of NF-κB share an N-terminal Rel homology domain (RHD), which mediates dimerization, interaction with the inhibitor of κB (IκB) proteins, nuclear translocation and DNA binding.22 In addition, p65, RelB and cRel contain C-terminal transactivation domains that trigger gene transcription. p65 contains two potent transactivation domains within its C-terminus and is probably the strongest activator of most genes with κB sites.23 The two other members of the human NF-κB family, p52 and p50, become active DNA-binding proteins after cleavage of larger precursors (inactive p105 is cleaved to p50 and p100 to p52).24 They activate transcription when they form heterodimers with subunits that contain transactivation domains (p65, RelB or cRel), but may also repress gene transcription when forming dimers without a transactivation domain (for example, p50–p50 homodimers).25
Table 1.
Protein | Amino acid length | Domains |
---|---|---|
NF-κB | ||
p65 (RelA) | 551 | RHD, TAD |
cRel | 619 | RHD, TAD |
RelB | 579 | LZ, RHD, TAD |
NF-κB and IκB | ||
p100 (p52) | 899 | RHD, 7 ankyrin repeats |
p105 (p50) | 969 | RHD, 7 ankyrin repeats |
IκB | ||
IκBα | 317 | 6 ankyrin repeats |
IκBβ | 356 | 6 ankyrin repeats |
IκBγ | 607 | 7 ankyrin repeats |
IκBε | 361 | 7 ankyrin repeats |
Bcl3 | 446 | 7 ankyrin repeats |
IκBζ | 718 | 5 ankyrin repeats |
IKK complex | ||
IKK1 (IKKα) | 745 | Kinase, LZ, HLH, NBD |
IKK2 (IKKβ) | 756 | Kinase, LZ, HLH, NBD |
NEMO (IKKγ) | 419 | CC1, CC2, LZ, Z |
Abbreviations: CC, coiled-coil domain; HLH, helix-loop-helix; IκB, inhibitor of κB; IKK inhibitory κB kinase; LZ, leucine zipper; NBD, NEMO, NF-κB essential modulator binding domain; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; RHD, rel homology domain; TAD, transactivation domain; Z, zinc finger.
Regulation of NF-κB activation
NF-κB is activated by various stimuli that present a potential danger to the host, resulting in the initiation of inflammatory, immune and wound-healing responses and the clearance of pathogens. Among the most potent activators of NF-κB are pathogen-derived molecules (such as lipopolysaccharide [LPS], viral and bacterial DNA and RNA) that stimulate Toll-like receptors (TLRs), as well as inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or interleukin (IL)-1.8, 26 The activation of NF-κB leads to the transcription of hundreds of genes with κB binding sites, most of which are involved in the regulation of inflammation, immune responses and cell survival.27
As uncontrolled inflammation may be deleterious, NF-κB activity is tightly regulated at several levels. In an unstimulated cell, the activity of NF-κB is to a large degree regulated by binding to inhibitory units of the group of IκB proteins, such as IκBα, IκBβ, IκBε, IκBγ, IκBζ and the related Bcl3 protein (Table 1). Binding of IκB to NF-κB masks the nuclear localization site of NF-κB and effectively sequesters NF-κB in the cytoplasm.28, 29 In order to activate NF-κB in response to specific stimuli, NF-κB needs to first be liberated from its inhibitory IκB partner. NF-κB can then translocate to the nucleus and initiate gene transcription (Figure 2). This activation can be achieved by two different pathways: the canonical pathway, which is activated in response to cytokines such as TNF, IL-1 or TLR agonists; and the noncanonical NF-κB pathway, which is particularly important in B cells30, 31 and is not discussed further here.
In the canonical pathway, IκB is phosphorylated by a high-molecular-weight kinase complex consisting of two different catalytic IκB kinase (IKK)-subunits and the structural protein NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO; also called IKKγ). IκBα, the most prominent IκB family member, is phosphorylated by this complex at two different serine residues (Ser32 and Ser36). Phosphorylation marks IκBα for subsequent degradation through an ubiquitin-dependent pathway,32 allowing nuclear entry, DNA-binding and transcriptional activity of the now-liberated NF-κB (Figure 2). While IκB proteins such as IκBα generally act as inhibitors of NF-κB activation, some IκB family members (such as nonphosphorylated IκBβ) may also upregulate NF-κB-mediated gene expression by binding p65–cRel complexes.33
As outlined above, IKK1 (also named IKKα) and IKK2 (also named IKKβ) are the catalytic subunits of the IKK complex and are both able to phosphorylate IκB, but IKK2 exerts a stronger kinase activity in vitro than IKK1.34–37 Despite fulfilling a key role in the regulation of NF-κB, the IKK complex also exerts functions independently of NF-κB. For example, IKK1 is recruited to NF-κB target genes, where it phosphorylates histone H3 and promotes cytokine-induced κB gene transcription38 as well as to retinoic-acid-dependent genes to regulate their transcription.39 Moreover, NEMO and IKKs appear to have NF-κB-independent functions that are likely to play a role in the regulation of cell death, inflammation and carcinogenesis.20,40,41 For example, IKKs phosphorylate and inhibit the transcription factor FOXO3 to promote carcinogenesis.40 NEMO is also involved in the regulation of interferon signaling41 and exerts NF-κB-independent functions in hepatocarcinogenesis.20
A second level of regulation of NF-κB activity is mediated by post-transcriptional modification of NF-κB subunits. In addition to phosphorylating IκBα, IKKs also directly phosphorylate p65 at residues Ser468 and Ser536 and cRel at Ser484, Ser494 and Ser525.22 A number of other kinases, such as the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A, glycogen synthase kinase 3β, protein kinase Cζ, serine threonine protein kinase 1 and ribosomal protein S6 kinase, are involved in the post-transcriptional modification of NF-κB subunits. 22 Additional post-translational modification of NF-κB include acetylation, ubiquitination or prolyl isomerization.22 Numerous studies suggest that post-translational modifications enhance NF-κB activity by modulating nuclear translocation, DNA binding, transactivation and the interaction with Cbp/p300-interacting transactivator 1. However, there is a lack of in vivo studies using knockin strategies to validate the role of most of the post-transcriptional modifications. Ser276 is the only phosphorylation site of p65 whose role has been validated in vivo: a Ser276Ala mutation causes premature death of knockin mice,42 and a Ser276Asp mutation leads to constitutive activation and systemic inflammation.43 Thus, phosphorylation of Ser276 in p65 is absolutely required for NF-κB activity, whereas the contribution of other sites remains to be proven in vivo. It should also be mentioned that the gene encoding IκBα is itself an NF-κB target gene and part of a negative-feedback loop—IκBα mediates nuclear export of the DNA-binding subunits, thus adding a third level of regulation.44 Finally, there is also feedback via NF-κB-dependent regulation of microRNAs; miR-146a expression is dependent upon NF-κB and is upregulated in response to TLR agonists and inflammatory cytokines.45 miR-146a targets signaling molecules that have a crucial function in the NF-κB pathway, such as IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) and TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), thus providing a negative feedback loop in the NF-κB signaling pathway.45
NF-κB links injury, fibrosis and HCC
A number of studies have substantiated the hypothesis that inflammation is not merely associated with chronic liver disease, but that it actively promotes disease progression 17, 46–48. >80% of HCCs occur in patients with hepatic cirrhosis or fibrosis and thus develop in a setting of chronic hepatocyte injury, regeneration, infiltration of inflammatory cells and an abundance of activated myofibroblasts.49 NF-κB has a wide range of functions in different cellular compartments influencing the survival of hepatocytes, inflammation in Kupffer cells, and survival, inflammation and activation in HSCs. This broad functionality means that NF-κB takes center stage in the regulation of central aspects of chronic liver disease and the resulting wound-healing responses that ultimately determine outcome (i.e. resolution of the disease, organ fibrosis and/or HCC).
The crucial role of NF-κB in the liver is underlined by the fact that genetic ablation of NF-κB regulators in mouse models leads to spontaneous liver injury, fibrosis and HCC,18, 20, 21 thus modeling the clinically most important complications of chronic liver disease in patients. Surprisingly, chronic injury per se is sufficient to initiate and promote hepatocarcinogenesis in these models, and does not require a priori mutations in oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes18, 20, 21 suggesting that HCC indeed is a ‘wound that never heals’. These genetic HCC models not only emphasize the key role of NF-κB in the progression of hepatic disease processes, but also underline the mechanistic links between liver injury, inflammation, fibrosis and HCC.18, 20, 21 Notably, these links also play a role in patients, since more than 80% of HCCs arise in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, i.e. in a setting of chronic inflammation and fibrosis1. Altogether, the intimate links between different cellular compartments in chronic liver disease suggest that the role of inflammatory and anti-apoptotic pathways such as NF-κB in the development of HCC can only be fully understood using animal models with chronic injury, inflammation and fibrosis.
NF-κB and hepatocellular injury
Owing to its anatomical location, the liver is the primary target of gut-derived pathogens and their products and is frequently involved in systemic infections.50 Many of these bacterial products (such as LPS) and LPS-induced cytokines (such as TNF) are toxic to hepatocytes, which means the hepatic response to these inflammatory mediators needs to be tightly regulated to avoid liver injury.51 Interestingly, NF-κB mediates both proinflammatory and antiapoptotic responses to these mediators, ensuring that hepatocytes are protected from cell death while appropriate inflammatory and immune responses are initiated. The dual function of the NF-κB pathway requires a delicate balance, since too little or too much NF-κB activation may have a negative impact on the liver owing to increased inflammation or insufficient protection from cell death. Accordingly, the NF-κB pathway is causally involved in many aspects of chronic liver disease, such as hepatitis and hepatocarcinogenesis.
Despite elevated levels of TNF in response to infection and other triggers of inflammation 52, TNF usually does not induce cell death in the liver. Accordingly, treatment of mice or primary hepatocyte cultures with TNF or LPS results in NF-κB activation, transcription of cytoprotective genes and virtually no cell death 53 unless transcription or translation is inhibited by cycloheximide, actinomycin D or D-galactosamine,54–56. Genetic mouse models, such as the Rela−/− knockout mouse, have provided evidence that NF-κB is the main transcriptional pathway for protecting hepatocytes from TNF-induced and LPS-induced cell death. Rela−/− knockout mice die in utero 15–16 days after conception as a result of hepatocyte apoptosis.57 This effect is caused by increased sensitivity to TNF, since mice that lack both Tnf and Rela are rescued from embryonic lethality.58 Blocking NF-κB by other approaches, such as using an IκB super-repressor, have confirmed these results 59, 60. While p65 is the main cytoprotective NF-κB subunit in hepatocytes, cRel provides additional protection; Rel−/−Rela−/− double-knockout mice undergo liver degeneration and embryonic death ~1.5 days earlier than Rela−/− single-knockout mice.61
Genetic experiments have also highlighted the crucial functions of the IKK subunits in TNF-mediated liver apoptosis.56–61 Ikk2−/− mice die in utero at embryonic day 12.5 as a result of massive apoptosis in the liver; fibroblasts from these mice show no activation of NF-κB in response to TNF and IL-1.62–64 A similar phenotype was noted in Nemo−/− mice, which also show massive hepatocyte apoptosis and a defect in NF-κB activation upon TNF stimulation in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts.65 By contrast, Ikk1−/− mice die shortly after birth and have a phenotype marked by skeletal defects, thickening of the skin and impaired limb outgrowth, but normal liver development.66, 67
These results were further strengthened by the findings of conditional gene targeting experiments.18–21,62,63 Conditional deletion of Nemo or the IKK-activating kinase TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) in hepatocytes resulted in complete blockage of TNF-induced NF-κB activation.18–21 These deletions also caused massive hepatocyte apoptosis in isolated hepatocytes and acute liver failure in vivo in response to low-dose LPS injections.18–21 Surprisingly, hepatocyte-specific deletion of Ikk2 resulted in substantial remnant NF-κB activation in response to TNF in hepatocytes and did not sensitize the livers of adult mice to TNF-induced or LPS-induced liver failure.68, 69 These findings suggest that IKK1 and IKK2 withhold redundant functions in canonical NF-κB signaling in the adult liver. Indeed, mice with combined hepatocyte-specific deletions of both Ikk1 and Ikk2 exhibited acute liver failure in response to LPS injection comparable with the response in Nemo−/− mutant mice.19 Mice deficient in Nemo or Tak1 even display spontaneous hepatocyte death, demonstrating that complete absence of NF-κB activity results in induction of cell death. This effect is most likely mediated by low circulating levels of TNF induced by the commensal gut microbiota, or ligand-independent triggering of TNF receptor I as suggested by the decreased hepatocyte death seen in Nemo−/−/Fadd−/−18 and Tak1−/−Tnrf−/− double knockout mice.21
It should be emphasized that a situation similar to the Nemo−/− or Tak1−/− mouse models, with virtually no NF-κB activity in hepatocytes, is unlikely to occur in patients. Moreover, it was demonstrated that TAK1 and NEMO control additional, as yet undefined, pathways that regulate hepatocyte injury in an NF-κB-independent manner.20 This finding highlights that the results of knockout studies should be interpreted carefully with regards the function of NF-κB in hepatocytes. However, it is likely that NF-κB activation in the liver is not homogeneous and that a proportion of hepatocytes with insufficient NF-κB activation at a given moment might be susceptible to injury, and contribute to a vicious cycle of chronic injury, regeneration and inflammation similar to that seen in the Nemo−/− and Tak1−/− mice. Accordingly, decreased NF-κB activation in patients with chronic hepatitis C is correlated with increased apoptosis and accelerated disease progression.15
The mechanism how NF-κB exerts its antiapoptotic function in TNF-induced apoptosis remained unclear for a long time. NF-κB induces transcription of a variety of target genes with potentially antiapoptotic functions, including the cellular inhibitors of apoptosis (cIAPs), such as cIAP1, cIAP2, XIAP, antiapoptotic Bcl2 family members A1 and BclxL, cFLIP and TRAF1 or TRAF2.27, 70 Genetic studies published in the past decade have unraveled a complex network regulated by NF-κB. This network involves interactions with other stress-related pathways, namely the c-Jun-(N)-terminal kinase (JNK) and the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades, and ultimately regulates cell death (Figure 2).
The induction of cell death in the absence of NF-κB activation largely depends on a prolonged activation of JNK.71, 72,73 This prolonged JNK activation induced by TNF depends on the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), whose generation is usually blocked by NF-κB.68, 74 In NF-κB-defective cells, ROS accumulate because of reduced expression of the NF-κB target gene SOD2, which encodes the ROS-metabolizing enzyme superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2).18, 75 ROS oxidize and inhibit JNK-inactivating phosphatases, thus causing prolonged JNK activity upon TNF stimulation.75 Prolonged JNK activation in turn accelerates the turnover of the NF-κB-induced antiapoptotic protein cFLIP (an inhibitor of caspase 8), through JNK-mediated phosphorylation and activation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itchy homolog.76 It should be pointed out that in another study, ablation of JNK1 and JNK2 in hepatocytes had little effect on hepatitis induced by LPS or concanavalin A.77 By contrast, ablation of JNK1 and JNK2 in both hematopoietic cells and hepatocytes reduced TNF production and hepatitis after administration of concanavalin A and LPS,77 providing evidence for a predominant role of JNK in the regulation of TNF production rather than in regulating hepatoycte death in a cell-autonomous manner.
NF-κB also collaborates with the p38 MAPK signaling cascade to protect hepatocytes from liver injury induced by TNF or LPS. Conditional deletion of p38α, the main p38 isoform, results in excessive JNK activation in response to LPS injection via hyperactivation of the upstream MAPK kinases MEKK4 and MEKK7.78 While this effect on JNK activation is not sufficient to sensitize hepatocytes to LPS-mediated or TNF-mediated apoptosis, an additional (slight) inhibition of NF-κB via co-deletion of Ikk2 results in massive apoptosis and liver failure in mice with liver-specific mutations in p38α and Ikk2 genes.78 NF-κB and p38α, therefore, have a synergistic effect in suppressing hyperactivation of JNK in response to TNF activation. The NF-κB–p38–JNK pathway represents a crucial network for the transmission of TNF-dependent signals and the activation of the caspase cascade in hepatocytes.
In addition, NF-κB target genes, such as IL6, activate additional cell signaling pathways including Stat3, which exerts a crucial role in inflammation, wound healing and hepatocarcinogenesis, and may be an essential link between inflammation and cancer 79, 80. In fact, data published in 2010 suggest that IL-6 is part of a procarcinogenic positive-feedback loop in which Stat3 activation upregulates miR-21 and miR-181b1, leading to downregulation of PTEN, upregulation of NF-κB and promotion of cellular transformation.81
While these data clearly point towards a cell-death-preventive function of NF-κB in hepatocyte apoptosis, some studies have indicated that a proinflammatory role of NF-κB might also promote hepatocyte cell death: Ischemia–reperfusion injury in rodents represents a complex model that reflects liver damage after organ transplantation or hemorrhagic shock and leads to an excessive inflammatory response followed by necrotic cell death. Mice with conditional deletion of Ikk2 in hepatocytes have a defect in NF-κB activation upon ischemia–reperfusion.69 Surprisingly, this partial NF-κB inhibition did not increase cell death, but instead resulted in dramatic attenuation of cellular necrosis along with considerably lower levels of aminotransferases and a decreased inflammatory infiltrate.69 At present, it is not clear how this cell-death-promoting action of NF-κB in the ischemia–reperfusion model is mediated, but findings in TAK1-deficient hepatocytes suggest that IKK subunits might even exert NF-κB-independent functions in cellular necrosis.20 Collectively, the effect of NF-κB on hepatocyte death seems to depend on the damaging agent and may vary among different models of liver injury.
NF-κB in liver fibrosis
Liver fibrosis is the result of chronic liver injury of different etiologies. While liver fibrosis usually reverses after cessation of injury,82–84 it may progress to cirrhosis if the underlying disease is not treated successfully, at which point it is generally irreversible.85 Moreover, liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis are accompanied by an increased risk of developing HCC, as >80% of HCCs develop in patients with hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis.1 At present, the most effective way to treat liver fibrosis is to heal the underlying disease,85 emphasizing the need to study the molecular mechanisms underlying this process. The principal cells responsible for promoting the hepatic deposition of cross-linked fibrillar collagen are hepatic myofibroblasts (HMF), which are believed to be largely derived from HSCs.86 In addition to promoting fibrosis, activated HSCs/HMF are also a source and a target of inflammatory mediators, which suggests that they are the crossroad of inflammation and fibrosis.86
NF-κB modulates hepatic fibrogenesis predominantly in three different cellular compartments: (A) by regulating hepatocyte injury, the primary trigger of fibrogenic responses in the liver; (B) by regulating inflammatory signals elicited in macrophages and other inflammatory cells in the liver; and (C) by regulating fibrogenic responses in HSCs. As described above, decreased or absent NF-κB activity in hepatocytes can lead to increased hepatocellular injury and subsequent fibrosis. The effect of increased NF-κB activation in hepatocytes on liver fibrosis is not well known. It is likely that normal or slightly increased NF-κB activity in hepatocytes protects against liver fibrosis by preventing hepatocyte death. However, there is probably a threshold beyond which NF-κB activation promotes the secretion of inflammatory and chemotactic factors in hepatocytes, and thereby worsens hepatic inflammation and fibrosis.
Kupffer cells are an important contributor to HSC/HMF activation and liver fibrosis.3, 87 Inhibition of NF-κB in Kupffer cells results in decreased liver fibrosis, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive.88 While the role of NF-κB activation in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells that leads to liver fibrosis is only incompletely understood, there is growing evidence that NF-κB acts as a key mediator of fibrosis in HSCs and/or hepatic myofibroblasts. A wide range of proinflammatory mediators activate NF-κB in HSC/HMF including LPS, TNF, IL-1β, angiotensin II and CD40L.3, 89–92 Moreover, HSC/HMF show activation of NF-κB during culture activation 93, and in human and mouse models of liver fibrosis as demonstrated by the presence of Ser536-phosphylated p65.91 Notably, NF-κB activation is almost exclusively found in HSCs/HMF whereas there is little NF-κB activation in hepatocytes.91 This observation is quite similar to the c-Jun/JNK pathway, which is also predominantly activated in HSC/HMF,94 suggesting that these cells are an important site of inflammation in the chronically injured and fibrotic liver. Notably, HSCs are a direct target of mediators that activate NF-κB, such as LPS in vivo.3 Accordingly, several NF-κB-dependent genes including IL-6, CXCL5, Ch25h and SAA3 are upregulated in HSCs isolated from bile-duct-ligated livers treated with CCl4.95
NF-κB has been suggested to regulate three key aspects of HSC and/or hepatic myofibroblast biology: (A) activation, (B) survival and (C) inflammatory responses (Figure 3). NF-κB may act as both a profibrogenic and an antifibrogenic signaling pathway: NF-κB exerts antifibrogenic effects by suppressing transcription of the Col1a1 gene.96 On the other hand, Crel deficient mice display decreased fibrosis and decreased activation of HSCs in vitro and in vivo.97 Conversely, deficiency of the NF-κB subunit p50, which largely represses NF-κB activation, increases hepatic fibrosis and inflammatory gene expression in HSCs.98, 99 NF-κB activation also plays a role in profibrogenic signaling pathways in response to LPS-mediated TLR4 activation such as the downregulation of the TGFβ pseudoreceptor BAMBI, leading to enhanced TGFβ signaling and HSC activation (Figure 3).3
The profibrogenic role of TLR4 in the liver was confirmed in three different experimental models of liver fibrosis.3 This role has been confirmed in humans; a single nucleotide polymorphism of TLR4 that results in decreased TLR4 signaling is associated with reduced disease progression.4 Similarly, TLR9-mediated activation of NF-κB has been associated with HSC activation and liver fibrosis.7, 100, 101 TLR4 and TLR9 activation appear to predominantly result from increased translocation of bacterial TLR agonists from the gut, as sterilizing the gut with antibiotics exerts a strong antifibrotic effect.3, 102, 103
In patients with chronic liver disease, survival of HSC/HMF is required for mounting an efficient fibrogenic response. Conversely, increased apoptosis of HSC/HMF promotes the reversal of fibrosis.104 NF-κB is a key mediator of HSC/HMF survival during fibrogenic responses (Figure 3), as demonstrated by the ability of NF-κB inhibitors such as sulfasalazine and/or an NF-κB inhibitory NEMO-binding peptide to promote HSC/HMF apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo.91, 105 Moreover, the application of sulfasalazine or angiotensin II inhibitors also blocked hepatic fibrogenesis in experimental models of liver fibrosis, suggesting that the antiapoptotic effects of NF-κB directly translate into decreased fibrogenic responses.105 Moreover, NF-κB is involved in downregulation of miR-29 family members in HSCs, leading to reduced suppression of a whole family of collagens and other extracellular matrix proteins in HSCs.106 In addition to affecting fibrogenesis in HSC/HMF, activation of NF-κB also promotes the secretion of various inflammatory mediators from these cells, including chemokines such as CCL2, CCL3, CXCL2 and CXCL5.3, 95 The increased secretion of chemokines leads to an influx of inflammatory cells including macrophages, which are known to interact with HSCs and to affect HSC activation and wound healing.3, 87
In summary, the activation of NF-κB in HSCs and/or hepatic myofibroblasts appears to promote hepatic fibrosis via multiple mechanisms, including direct fibrogenic effects, antiapoptotic effects and the secretion of macrophage-recruiting chemokines. The increased activation of NF-κB in HSC/HMF may also contribute to a tumor-friendly microenvironment in the fibrotic liver, for example by providing inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines and chemokines as well as quantitative and qualitative changes of the extracellular matrix. However, no functional investigations have been performed to establish a role of NF-κB in HSC/HMF in tumor initiation or promotion in the setting of liver fibrosis.
NF-κB in HCC
In the great majority of cases, HCC arises in a setting of chronic inflammation and subsequent liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.1 In addition to infection with HBV or HCV, alcohol consumption, NAFLD and the uptake of liver toxins (e.g. aflatoxin B1) represent the main risk factors for hepatocarcinogenesis.49
NF-κB activation is a frequent and early event in human liver cancers of viral or nonviral etiologies and has been associated with the acquisition of a transformed phenotype during hepatocarcinogenesis.107 A number of different factors may trigger activation of NF-κB during hepatocarcinogenesis. In HBV-induced HCC, it has been suggested that the oncogenic HBV-X protein activates the NF-κB signaling pathway through the upregulation of TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1).108 This upregulation might promote progression of HCC via proliferative and antiapoptotic effects, as well as the spreading of liver tumor cells.109, 110 NF-κB activation is also detected in HCV-infected livers and in cells transfected with HCV core protein.16 Moreover, many patients with advanced liver disease display increased levels of LPS, resulting in activation of NF-κB in the liver.50 Fatty acids may also activate NF-κB,111 and are likely to contribute to the increased NF-κB activation seen in patients with NAFLD.11, 13 As emphasized in the previous sections, NF-κB activation in the setting of chronic injury is not restricted to hepatocytes but may also occur in other cellular compartments including macrophages, HSCs and HMF (Figure 4).
Genetically modified mouse models of HCC have been helpful for investigating the roles of NF-κB in different cell populations. A procarcinogenic role of NF-κB in hepatocytes was first demonstrated in the Mdr2−/− knockout mouse, which develops HCC [in response to chronic biliary hepatitis.112 In this model, hepatocyte-specific overexpression of the IκBα-super-repressor—a nondegradable mutant form of IκBα—leads to stable inhibition of inducible NF-κB activation and decreased liver tumor development compared with mice with intact NF-κB signaling. Importantly, NF-κB inhibition did not alter tumor initiation in this model, but was able to efficiently block later steps of the progression of transformed hepatocytes to HCC.103 This finding provides essential proof of the principle that NF-κB is a potential target for cancer prevention in chronic inflammatory liver disease. The findings from the Mdr2−/− mouse were supported by a study in another inflammatory HCC model—a transgenic mouse overexpressing the cytokines lymphotoxin α and/or lymphotoxin β in the liver.113 In this mouse model, inhibition of NF-κB by hepatocyte-specific deletion of IKK2 almost completely abolished hepatocarcinogenesis.113 This finding again argues for a pro-carcinogenic function of NF-κB in a setting in which hepatocarcinogenesis is predominantly driven by inflammatory mediators secreted from hepatocytes.
In contrast to the studies discussed above, NF-κB inhibition by deletion of IKK2 in hepatocytes resulted in increased liver tumor formation in the genotoxic diethylnitrosamine (DEN) tumor model.114–116 In another study, inhibition of NF-κB by deletion of NEMO (the regulatory IKK subunit) in parenchymal liver cells led to spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in mice.18 In both situations, hepatocellular injury appears to be an important mechanism that contributes to (in the DEN model) or initiates (in the NEMO-knockout model) HCC formation. Interestingly, IKK2 deletion also accelerates the development of HCC in the later stages of hepatocarcinogenesis by increasing proliferation of DEN-initiated hepatocytes and increasing Stat3 activation.116 This observation suggests that IKK2 prevents HCC by suppressing both liver injury and hepatocyte proliferation. Procarcinogenic effects of IKK2 deletion are, at least in part, mediated by increased JNK activation, as shown by the reduced HCC development in Jnk1 Ikk2 double knockout mice.115 Additionally, data from mice with deletion of Tak1 suggest that NEMO, and possibly other IKK subunits, might not only play a role in NF-κB activation but might also control other pathways to liver cancer.20
Obesity has been identified as an important risk factor for HCC 117, and it has been suggested that NAFLD will become a leading cause of the development of HCC 118. Moreover, the presence of diabetes nearly doubles the risk for HCC 119, 120. Patients with NAFLD display increased hepatic NF-κB activation,121 which is believed to contribute to hepatic insulin resistance.122, 123 Several studies support the hypothesis that NF-κB also plays an important role in the promotion of obesity associated HCC through IL6 and TNF, two well-known NF-κB target genes, whose expression is also considerably increased in obese patients: There is a strong increase in HCC in both genetic and chemical models of HCC124, 125 and ablation of IL-6 and TNF-R1 strongly reduces HCC load in mice receiving a combination of DEN and a high-fat diet.125 These studies also emphasize the link between NF-κB and other procarcinogenic pathways, such as Stat3, mediated by the NF-κB target gene IL6.
When transferring the data on NF-κB from mouse models into the human situation, one not only has to differentiate between its role in different phases and cellular compartments, but also to consider the physiology of the employed mouse models as well as the degree of NF-κB inhibition that often can reach unphysiological levels in genetic mouse models. For example, the DEN model of HCC does not induce the chronic injury, inflammation and fibrosis that is typical of the great majority of human HCCs, and the role of NF-κB in nonparenchymal cells is underestimated in this model. NF-κB most likely exerts specific effects in different cellular compartments such as hepatocytes, Kupffer cells and HSCs and/or hepatic myofibroblasts; that NF-κB activation may affect hepatocarcinogenesis through cell-specific mechanisms (Figure 4). When considering all these variables, NF-κB appears to act as a promoter rather than a suppressor of HCC in relevant physiological settings.
The role of NF-κB in other cell populations, such as macrophages, sinusoidal endothelial cells and HSCs and/or hepatic myofibroblasts in hepatocarcinogenesis has not yet been studied in detail. However, a study published in 2005 indicates that NF-κB is likely to have a procarcinogenic role in Kupffer cells.105 In this study, deletion of IKK2 in all hepatic cell populations (including Kupffer cells) by Mx1-Cre resulted in a decrease of DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, whereas deletion of IKK2 in hepatocytes by Alb-Cre resulted in increased hepatocarcinogenesis.114 This study not only indicates a role for Kupffer cell NF-κB, but even suggests that the absence of IKK2 in Kupffer cells can override the increased injury observed in hepatocytes that lack IKK2. However, it should be noted that the deletion of Mx1-Cre is not specific for Kupffer cells, and the HCC suppression in this model could have been mediated by other bone-marrow-derived cells such as neutrophils, B cells, T cells or dendritic cells, or even resident hepatic cells, such as HSCs.
The contribution of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells to hepatic NF-κB activation and HCC is largely unknown. In liver development, IKK and/or NF-κB is required for the development of the sinusoidal vasculature and the prevention of hepatocyte apoptosis, but not the development of vasculature in other organs at the same time point.126 However, there is little known about the role of NF-κB in liver sinusoidal cells in chronic injury and hepatocarcinogenesis.
In addition to exerting specific effects in different hepatic cell populations, such as hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and HSCs and/or hepatic myofibroblasts, it is also possible that NF-κB functions are not homogenous within one cell population. In addition, decreased NF-κB activation in some hepatocytes may result in apoptosis and regenerative responses, whereas increases in other populations may be responsible for their survival and malignant transformation. Moreover, it should be considered that the parenchymal cells are quite heterogeneous in the setting of chronic injury and that there is an increase in immature progenitor cells. It is conceivable that NF-κB exerts specific functions in progenitor cells and that too much and too little NF-κB activation in the same liver but within different cellular compartments or differentiation stages, contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis.
Despite the differences in NF-κB inhibition and HCC models among various studies, the data on the hepatocyte-specific function of NF-κB should not be seen as contradictory, but rather as a reflection of different models and circumstances, and an opportunity to learn about different aspects of the role of NF-κB in the liver. Several important conclusions relevant for the design of pharmacologic therapies targeting NF-κB can be drawn from these different models and studies. First, increased liver injury after NF-κB inhibition promotes liver cancer, as reflected in the NEMO knockout mice and TAK1 knockout mice, as well as the DEN-treated IKK2 knockout mice. Second, inhibition of NF-κB can suppress HCC if cells that are responsible for producing tumor-promoting proinflammatory mediators are targeted, at the same time increased liver injury is avoided. Third, it is possible that there are differences between targeting IKK (which may have functions not related to NF-κB) and targeting IκB (which does not appear to have functions outside of the NF-κB pathway).
Conclusions
Since its discovery more than 20 years ago, the NF-κB pathway has emerged as one of the best-characterized signaling pathways. The central role of NF-κB in liver homeostasis, and the regulation of inflammation, fibrosis and carcinogenesis is of high clinical relevance for chronic liver diseases. However, despite the considerable number of basic research studies and the growing number of chemical compounds targeting this pathway, there remains a gap in the translation of these findings into clinical hepatology. The low degree of enthusiasm for clinical applications is probably attributable to the complex consequences of IKK and NF-κB inhibition in mouse models of liver disease. This complexity reflects the diverse and often cell-specific functions of this pathway, as well as the current emphasis on the injury-promoting and HCC-promoting effects of hepatocyte-specific NF-κB inhibition. However, careful interpretation of data from mouse knockout models and further research of the role of NF-κB in nonparenchymal cells, such as HSC/HMF and Kupffer cells, in the development of fibrosis and their contribution to the tumor microenvironment may be helpful to translate anti-inflammatory treatment strategies based on NF-κB into clinical hepatology.
At present, there are no treatment options to prevent the development of cirrhosis and HCC in patients in whom the underlying disease cannot be cured. As outlined in this Review, NF-κB seems to be crucially involved both in fibrogenesis and in the initiation and promotion of HCC in the chronically inflamed liver. This involvement suggests that pharmacological targeting of this pathway might represent a promising strategy to intercept the potentially fatal fibrosis–carcinogenesis sequence. While new treatment approaches, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, might target both profibrogenic and procarcinogenic pathways,127, 128 the inflammatory components of chronic liver diseases that lead to fibrosis and HCC remain largely unaffected by this and other treatments.
A careful interpretation of results from mouse studies and additional preclinical studies will be helpful to establish promising candidates for anti-inflammatory interventions in patients with chronic liver disease. These interventions could be at the level of upstream activators of NF-κB such as LPS, TLR4, IL-1 or TNF, at the level of NF-κB subunits or NF-κB activating kinases, at the level of genes regulated by NF-κB such as IL6, or at the level of pathways that are modulated by NF-κB, such as JNK. The choice of molecular target, the degree of inhibition and the ability to target specific cell types in the liver will be crucial to develop regimens with low toxicity that would justify taking the step towards the first clinical studies in patients with chronic liver disease.
Key points.
Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is a key regulator of inflammation in many hepatic cell populations and is required for hepatocyte survival and liver homeostasis
Survival and activation of hepatic stellate cells and hepatic myofibroblasts is regulated by NF-κB
The key roles of NF-κB in the regulation of cell death, inflammation and wound healing make it an important modulator of hepatic disease progression
NF-κB is a potential link between chronic liver injury, fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma
Cell-type-specific functions of NF-κB need to be taken into account when designing therapies that target this transcription factor
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of NIH grants U54CA126513, R01DK076920 and R21AT003878 (R. F. Schwabe), European Research Council Starting grant ERC-2007-Stg/208237 (T. Luedde), the German Research Foundation grant SFB/TRR57/P06 (T. Luedde) and an Ernst-Jung-Foundation (Hamburg) grant (T. Luedde).
References
- 1.Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, Donato F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S35–50. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bonacchi A, et al. The chemokine CCL21 modulates lymphocyte recruitment and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1060–76. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)01194-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seki E, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13:1324–32. doi: 10.1038/nm1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guo J, et al. Functional linkage of cirrhosis-predictive single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptor 4 to hepatic stellate cell responses. Hepatology. 2009;49:960–8. doi: 10.1002/hep.22697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seki E, et al. CCR1 and CCR5 promote hepatic fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1858–70. doi: 10.1172/JCI37444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dominguez M, et al. Hepatic expression of CXC chemokines predicts portal hypertension and survival in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1639–50. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miura K, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 promotes steatohepatitis by induction of interleukin-1beta in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:323–34. e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Karin M, Ben-Neriah Y. Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-[kappa]B activity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:621–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ghosh S, Karin M. Missing pieces in the NF-kappaB puzzle. Cell. 2002;109 (Suppl):S81–96. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00703-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiao C, Ghosh S. NF-kappaB, an evolutionarily conserved mediator of immune and inflammatory responses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2005;560:41–5. doi: 10.1007/0-387-24180-9_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reddy JK, Rao MS. Lipid metabolism and liver inflammation. II. Fatty liver disease and fatty acid oxidation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G852–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00521.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mandrekar P, Szabo G. Signalling pathways in alcohol-induced liver inflammation. J Hepatol. 2009;50:1258–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Videla LA, et al. Liver NF-kappaB and AP-1 DNA binding in obese patients. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:973–9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hosel M, et al. Not interferon, but interleukin-6 controls early gene expression in hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2009;50:1773–82. doi: 10.1002/hep.23226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boya P, et al. Nuclear factor-kappa B in the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis C: decreased RelA expression is associated with enhanced fibrosis progression. Hepatology. 2001;34:1041–8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.29002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tai DI, et al. Activation of nuclear factor kappaB in hepatitis C virus infection: implications for pathogenesis and hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2000;31:656–64. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kosters A, Karpen SJ. The role of inflammation in cholestasis: clinical and basic aspects. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:186–94. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Luedde T, et al. Deletion of NEMO/IKKgamma in liver parenchymal cells causes steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:119–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luedde T, et al. IKK1 and IKK2 cooperate to maintain bile duct integrity in the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 2008;105:9733–9738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800198105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bettermann K, et al. TAK1 suppresses a NEMO-dependent but NF-kappaB-independent pathway to liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:481–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Inokuchi S, et al. Disruption of TAK1 in hepatocytes causes hepatic injury, inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:844–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909781107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schmitz ML, Mattioli I, Buss H, Kracht M. NF-kappaB: a multifaceted transcription factor regulated at several levels. Chembiochem. 2004;5:1348–58. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200400144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmitz ML, Baeuerle PA. The p65 subunit is responsible for the strong transcription activating potential of NF-kappa B. EMBO J. 1991;10:3805–3817. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04950.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Amir RE, Haecker H, Karin M, Ciechanover A. Mechanism of processing of the NF-kappa B2 p100 precursor: identification of the specific polyubiquitin chain-anchoring lysine residue and analysis of the role of NEDD8-modification on the SCF(beta-TrCP) ubiquitin ligase. Oncogene. 2004;23:2540–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saha A, Hammond CE, Trojanowska M, Smolka AJ. Helicobacter pylori-induced H,K-ATPase alpha-subunit gene repression is mediated by NF-kappaB p50 homodimer promoter binding. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294:G795–807. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00431.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.West AP, Koblansky AA, Ghosh S. Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:409–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.122303.115827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pahl HL. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. Oncogene. 1999;18:6853–6866. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Basak S, et al. A fourth IkappaB protein within the NF-kappaB signaling module. Cell. 2007;128:369–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hoffmann A, Natoli G, Ghosh G. Transcriptional regulation via the NF-kappaB signaling module. Oncogene. 2006;25:6706–16. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Senftleben U, et al. Activation by IKKalpha of a second, evolutionary conserved, NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Science. 2001;293:1495–1499. doi: 10.1126/science.1062677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dejardin E. The alternative NF-kappaB pathway from biochemistry to biology: pitfalls and promises for future drug development. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72:1161–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yaron A, et al. Identification of the receptor component of the IkappaBalpha-ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 1998;396:590–594. doi: 10.1038/25159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rao P, et al. IkappaBbeta acts to inhibit and activate gene expression during the inflammatory response. Nature. 2010;466:1115–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Delhase M, Hayakawa M, Chen Y, Karin M. Positive and negative regulation of IkappaB kinase activity through IKKbeta subunit phosphorylation. Science. 1999;284:309–313. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mercurio F, et al. IKK-1 and IKK-2: cytokine-activated IkappaB kinases essential for NF-kappaB activation. Science. 1997;278:860–866. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Woronicz JD, Gao X, Cao Z, Rothe M, Goeddel DV. IkappaB kinase-beta: NF-kappaB activation and complex formation with IkappaB kinase-alpha and NIK. Science. 1997;278:866–869. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zandi E, Rothwarf DM, Delhase M, Hayakawa M, Karin M. The IkappaB kinase complex (IKK) contains two kinase subunits, IKKalpha and IKKbeta, necessary for IkappaB phosphorylation and NF-kappaB activation. Cell. 1997;91:243–252. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80406-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Anest V, et al. A nucleosomal function for IkappaB kinase-alpha in NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression. Nature. 2003;423:659–663. doi: 10.1038/nature01648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gareus R, et al. Normal epidermal differentiation but impaired skin-barrier formation upon keratinocyte-restricted IKK1 ablation. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:461–469. doi: 10.1038/ncb1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hu MC, et al. IkappaB kinase promotes tumorigenesis through inhibition of forkhead FOXO3a. Cell. 2004;117:225–237. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00302-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao T, et al. The NEMO adaptor bridges the nuclear factor-kappaB and interferon regulatory factor signaling pathways. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:592–600. doi: 10.1038/ni1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dong J, Jimi E, Zhong H, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Repression of gene expression by unphosphorylated NF-kappaB p65 through epigenetic mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1159–73. doi: 10.1101/gad.1657408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dong J, Jimi E, Zeiss C, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Constitutively active NF-kappaB triggers systemic TNFalpha-dependent inflammation and localized TNFalpha-independent inflammatory disease. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1709–17. doi: 10.1101/gad.1958410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Arenzana-Seisdedos F, et al. Nuclear localization of I kappa B alpha promotes active transport of NF-kappa B from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. J Cell Sci. 1997;110 (Pt 3):369–378. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.3.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.O’Connell RM, Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Cheng G, Baltimore D. MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:1604–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610731104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Karin M. NF-kappaB as a critical link between inflammation and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a000141. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mencin A, Kluwe J, Schwabe RF. Toll-like receptors as targets in chronic liver diseases. Gut. 2009;58:704–20. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.156307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wasmuth HE, Tacke F, Trautwein C. Chemokines in liver inflammation and fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:215–25. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Okuda K. Hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2000;32:225–237. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80428-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schwabe RF, Seki E, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor signaling in the liver. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1886–900. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Luedde T, Trautwein C. Intracellular survival pathways in the liver. Liver Int. 2006;26:1163–1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Beutler B, Grau GE. Tumor necrosis factor in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:S423–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.FitzGerald MJ, Webber EM, Donovan JR, Fausto N. Rapid DNA binding by nuclear factor kappa B in hepatocytes at the start of liver regeneration. Cell Growth Differ. 1995;6:417–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Leist M, et al. Murine hepatocyte apoptosis induced in vitro and in vivo by TNF-alpha requires transcriptional arrest. J Immunol. 1994;153:1778–1788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lehmann V, Freudenberg MA, Galanos C. Lethal toxicity of lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor in normal and D-galactosamine-treated mice. J Exp Med. 1987;165:657–663. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.3.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Leist M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis during the poisoning of mice with hepatotoxins. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:923–934. doi: 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Beg AA, Baltimore D. An essential role for NF-kappaB in preventing TNF-alpha-induced cell death. Science. 1996;274:782–784. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Doi TS, et al. Absence of tumor necrosis factor rescues RelA-deficient mice from embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 1999;96:2994–2999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Iimuro Y, et al. NFkappaB prevents apoptosis and liver dysfunction during liver regeneration. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:802–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xu Y, et al. NF-kappaB inactivation converts a hepatocyte cell line TNF-alpha response from proliferation to apoptosis. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:C1058–66. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.275.4.C1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Grossmann M, et al. The combined absence of the transcription factors Rel and RelA leads to multiple hemopoietic cell defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 1999;96:11848–11853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Li Q, Van Antwerp D, Mercurio F, Lee KF, Verma IM. Severe liver degeneration in mice lacking the IkappaB kinase 2 gene. Science. 1999;284:321–325. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li ZW, et al. The IKKbeta subunit of IkappaB kinase (IKK) is essential for nuclear factor kappaB activation and prevention of apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1839–1845. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.11.1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tanaka M, et al. Embryonic lethality, liver degeneration, and impaired NF-kappa B activation in IKK-beta-deficient mice. Immunity. 1999;10:421–429. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rudolph D, et al. Severe liver degeneration and lack of NF-kappaB activation in NEMO/IKKgamma-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 2000;14:854–862. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hu Y, et al. Abnormal morphogenesis but intact IKK activation in mice lacking the IKKalpha subunit of IkappaB kinase. Science. 1999;284:316–320. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Takeda K, et al. Limb and skin abnormalities in mice lacking IKKalpha. Science. 1999;284:313–316. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Maeda S, et al. IKKbeta is required for prevention of apoptosis mediated by cell-bound but not by circulating TNFalpha. Immunity. 2003;19:725–737. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00301-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Luedde T, et al. Deletion of IKK2 in hepatocytes does not sensitize these cells to TNF-induced apoptosis but protects from ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:849–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI23493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Karin M, Lin A. NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death. Nat Immunol. 2002 Mar;3(3):221–227. doi: 10.1038/ni0302-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.De Smaele E, et al. Induction of gadd45beta by NF-kappaB downregulates pro-apoptotic JNK signalling. Nature. 2001;414:308–313. doi: 10.1038/35104560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tang G, et al. Inhibition of JNK activation through NF-kappaB target genes. Nature. 2001;414:313–317. doi: 10.1038/35104568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schwabe RF, et al. Differential requirement for c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase in TNFalpha-and Fas-mediated apoptosis in hepatocytes. FASEB J. 2004;18:720–2. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0771fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chen F, Castranova V, Li Z, Karin M, Shi X. Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappaB kinase deficiency enhances oxidative stress and prolongs c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation induced by arsenic. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7689–7693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kamata H, et al. Reactive oxygen species promote TNFalpha-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell. 2005;120:649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chang L, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase itch couples JNK activation to TNFalpha-induced cell death by inducing c-FLIP(L) turnover. Cell. 2006;124:601–613. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Das M, et al. Induction of hepatitis by JNK-mediated expression of TNF-alpha. Cell. 2009;136:249–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Heinrichsdorff J, Luedde T, Perdiguero E, Nebreda AR, Pasparakis M. p38 alpha MAPK inhibits JNK activation and collaborates with IkappaB kinase 2 to prevent endotoxin-induced liver failure. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:1048–54. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bromberg J, Wang TC. Inflammation and cancer: IL-6 and STAT3 complete the link. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:79–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Naugler WE, Karin M. The wolf in sheep’s clothing: the role of interleukin-6 in immunity, inflammation and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:109–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Iliopoulos D, Jaeger SA, Hirsch HA, Bulyk ML, Struhl K. STAT3 activation of miR-21 and miR-181b-1 via PTEN and CYLD are part of the epigenetic switch linking inflammation to cancer. Mol Cell. 2010;39:493–506. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hammel P, et al. Regression of liver fibrosis after biliary drainage in patients with chronic pancreatitis and stenosis of the common bile duct. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:418–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102083440604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Muretto P, Angelucci E, Lucarelli G. Reversibility of cirrhosis in patients cured of thalassemia by bone marrow transplantation. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:667–72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Shiratori Y, et al. Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:517–24. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-7-200004040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:209–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI24282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Friedman SL. Mechanisms of disease: Mechanisms of hepatic fibrosis and therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;1:98–105. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Duffield JS, et al. Selective depletion of macrophages reveals distinct, opposing roles during liver injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:56–65. doi: 10.1172/JCI22675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Son G, et al. Selective inactivation of NF-kappaB in the liver using NF-kappaB decoy suppresses CCl4-induced liver injury and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G631–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00185.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Paik YH, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates inflammatory signaling by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2003;37:1043–55. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hellerbrand C, et al. Inhibition of NFkappaB in activated rat hepatic stellate cells by proteasome inhibitors and an IkappaB super-repressor. Hepatology. 1998;27:1285–95. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Oakley F, et al. Angiotensin II activates I kappaB kinase phosphorylation of RelA at Ser 536 to promote myofibroblast survival and liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2334–2344. e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Schwabe RF, Schnabl B, Kweon YO, Brenner DA. CD40 activates NF-kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase and enhances chemokine secretion on activated human hepatic stellate cells. J Immunol. 2001;166:6812–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Elsharkawy AM, et al. Persistent activation of nuclear factor-kappaB in cultured rat hepatic stellate cells involves the induction of potentially novel Rel-like factors and prolonged changes in the expression of IkappaB family proteins. Hepatology. 1999;30:761–9. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kluwe J, et al. Modulation of hepatic fibrosis by c-Jun-N-terminal kinase inhibition. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:347–59. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.De Minicis S, et al. Gene expression profiles during hepatic stellate cell activation in culture and in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1937–46. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Rippe RA, Schrum LW, Stefanovic B, Solis-Herruzo JA, Brenner DA. NF-kappaB inhibits expression of the alpha1(I) collagen gene. DNA Cell Biol. 1999;18:751–61. doi: 10.1089/104454999314890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Gieling RG, et al. The c-Rel subunit of nuclear factor-kappaB regulates murine liver inflammation, wound-healing, and hepatocyte proliferation. Hepatology. 2010;51:922–31. doi: 10.1002/hep.23385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Elsharkawy AM, et al. The NF-kappaB p50:p50:HDAC-1 repressor complex orchestrates transcriptional inhibition of multiple pro-inflammatory genes. J Hepatol. 2010;53:519–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Oakley F, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB1 (p50) limits the inflammatory and fibrogenic responses to chronic injury. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:695–708. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62291-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gabele E, et al. Role of TLR9 in hepatic stellate cells and experimental liver fibrosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376:271–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Watanabe A, et al. Apoptotic hepatocyte DNA inhibits hepatic stellate cell chemotaxis via toll-like receptor 9. Hepatology. 2007;46:1509–18. doi: 10.1002/hep.21867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Rutenburg AM, et al. The role of intestinal bacteria in the development of dietary cirrhosis in rats. J Exp Med. 1957;106:1–14. doi: 10.1084/jem.106.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Broitman SA, Gottlieb LS, Zamcheck N. Influence Of Neomycin And Ingested Endotoxin In The Pathogenesis Of Choline Deficiency Cirrhosis In The Adult Rat. J Exp Med. 1964;119:633–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.4.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Iredale JP, et al. Mechanisms of spontaneous resolution of rat liver fibrosis. Hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and reduced hepatic expression of metalloproteinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:538–549. doi: 10.1172/JCI1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Oakley F, et al. Inhibition of inhibitor of kappaB kinases stimulates hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and accelerated recovery from rat liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:108–120. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Roderburg C, et al. Micro-RNA profiling reveals a role for miR-29 in human and murine liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2010 doi: 10.1002/hep.23922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Liu P, et al. Activation of NF-kappa B, AP-1 and STAT transcription factors is a frequent and early event in human hepatocellular carcinomas. J Hepatol. 2002;37:63–71. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kim HR, Lee SH, Jung G. The hepatitis B viral X protein activates NF-kappaB signaling pathway through the up-regulation of TBK1. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:525–30. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhang F, Wang Q, Ye L, Feng Y, Zhang X. Hepatitis B virus X protein upregulates expression of calpain small subunit 1 via nuclear factor-kappaB/p65 in hepatoma cells. J Med Virol. 2010;82:920–8. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lu B, et al. Increased Expression of iASPP, Regulated by Hepatitis B Virus X Protein-Mediated NF-kappaB Activation, in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2010 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shi H, et al. TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:3015–25. doi: 10.1172/JCI28898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Pikarsky E, et al. NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature. 2004;431:461–466. doi: 10.1038/nature02924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Haybaeck J, et al. A lymphotoxin-driven pathway to hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:295–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Maeda S, Kamata H, Luo JL, Leffert H, Karin M. IKKbeta couples hepatocyte death to cytokine-driven compensatory proliferation that promotes chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. Cell. 2005;121:977–990. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sakurai T, Maeda S, Chang L, Karin M. Loss of hepatic NF-kappa B activity enhances chemical hepatocarcinogenesis through sustained c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10544–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603499103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.He G, et al. Hepatocyte IKKbeta/NF-kappaB inhibits tumor promotion and progression by preventing oxidative stress-driven STAT3 activation. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:286–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Nordenstedt H, White DL, El-Serag HB. The changing pattern of epidemiology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42 (Suppl 3):S206–14. doi: 10.1016/S1590-8658(10)60507-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.El-Serag HB, Tran T, Everhart JE. Diabetes increases the risk of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:460–8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Jee SH, et al. Fasting serum glucose level and cancer risk in Korean men and women. JAMA. 2005;293:194–202. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ribeiro PS, et al. Hepatocyte apoptosis, expression of death receptors, and activation of NF-kappaB in the liver of nonalcoholic and alcoholic steatohepatitis patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1708–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Arkan MC, et al. IKK-beta links inflammation to obesity-induced insulin resistance. Nat Med. 2005;11:191–8. doi: 10.1038/nm1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Cai D, et al. Local and systemic insulin resistance resulting from hepatic activation of IKK-beta and NF-kappaB. Nat Med. 2005;11:183–90. doi: 10.1038/nm1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Wunderlich FT, et al. Hepatic NF-kappa B essential modulator deficiency prevents obesity-induced insulin resistance but synergizes with high-fat feeding in tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1297–302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707849104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Park EJ, et al. Dietary and genetic obesity promote liver inflammation and tumorigenesis by enhancing IL-6 and TNF expression. Cell. 2010;140:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hou Y, Li F, Karin M, Ostrowski MC. Analysis of the IKKbeta/NF-kappaB signaling pathway during embryonic angiogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2008;237:2926–35. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Llovet JM, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Wang Y, et al. New insights into the antifibrotic effects of sorafenib on hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2010;53:132–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Luedde T, Trautwein C. In: Signaling Pathways in Liver Diseases. 2. Dufour JF, editor. Vol. 13. Springer; Heidelberg, Germany: 2010. pp. 201–214. [Google Scholar]