Abstract
Aim:
Cheiloscopy is a forensic investigation technique that deals with identification of humans based on lips traces. The aim of this study is to establish the uniqueness of lip prints which aids in personal identification.
Materials and Methods:
The study group comprised of 200 subjects. The materials used were dark-colored lipstick, paper, cellophane tape, a brush, and a magnifying lens.
Results:
This study shows that lip prints are unique and permanent for each individual, and the lip prints among family members and between twins revealed different patterns on the whole with few similar grooves suggesting the existence of heredity in the lip prints.
Conclusion:
Our study showed that lip prints are unique to each individual and can be used for personal identification.
Keywords: Cheiloscopy, forensic science, lip prints
Introduction
Forensic science refers to the areas of endeavor that can be used in a judicial setting and accepted by the court and the general scientific community to separate truth from untruth.[1] In forensic identification, the mouth allows for a myriad of possibilities. Due to the distinctive features of teeth, dental identification is one of the most popular ways to positively identify an individual. In fact, teeth are known to have singular features and possess extraordinary resistance to extreme conditions. These properties enable fast and secure identification processes.[2]
The traditional methods for personal identification include anthropometry, finger prints, sex determination, age estimation, measurement of height, and differentiation by blood groups, DNA and odontology.[3] Cheiloscopy (from the Greek word cheiloswhich means lips) is the forensic investigation technique that deals with identification of humans based on lip traces.[4] The biological phenomenon of systems of furrows on the red part of human lips was first noted by anthropologists. Fisher was the first to describe it in 1902.[2,4–6] It is possible to identify lip patterns as early as the sixth week of intrauterine life. Thereafter, lip groove patterns rarely change, resisting many afflictions.[3]
This study was carried out with the objectives of investigating and evaluating the uniqueness of lip prints, their role in personal identification and for particular lip print pattern identification among family members and twins and also in evaluating the permanence of lip prints.
Materials and Methods
The sample comprised of 200 subjects who were divided into four groups: group 1 consisted of 85 males and 85 females of the age group between 5 and 30 years; group 2 comprised of fivepairs of twins; group 3 comprised of fivefamilies (father, mother, child A and child B in each family); and group 4 comprised of 10 males and 10 females, whose lip prints were recorded twice at the interval of 3 months. Subjects with inflammation of lips, trauma, malformation, deformity, surgical scars, and active lesions of the lips were excluded. The materials used were dark-colored lipstick, bond paper, cellophane tape (two inch wide), a brush for applying the lipstick, and a magnifying lens. After obtaining verbal consent, the lip print of each individual was recorded. The lipstick was applied with the brush in a single motion evenly on the lips of each individual. The subjects were asked to retain a relaxed lip position, and a lip impression was taken. The glued portion of the cellophane tape was used to make the impression, which was then stuck on to the bond paper. Minimal pressure was maintained while making the lip impression. The impression was subsequently visualized with the magnifying lens. The lip prints were divided into four quadrants; right upper as the first quadrant, left upper as the second quadrant, left lower as the third quadrant, and right lower as the fourth quadrant. The lip print patterns were analyzed following the classification of Suzuki andTsuchihashi[3] [Table 1 and Figure 1]. The data were compiled and the following results were drawn.
Table 1.
Results
All lip prints showed different patterns. The lip print did not consist simply of one type of groove alone, but appeared as a mixture of varying types [Figures 2–6]. In group 1, type II groove was most commonly seen and the second most common groove was type I´ followed by type I. Types III and IV grooves were mostly seen in the upper lip and rarely seen in the lower lip, and type V was seen commonly in the lower lip [Figure 7]. All the four quadrants showed different patterns in 29% of males and 26% of females. Similar lip print patterns were observed in three quadrants in 14% of males and 11% of females. Similar lip print patterns were observed in two quadrants in 51% of males and 55% of females. Similarities among all the four quadrants were noticed in 7% of males and 6% of females [Figure 8]. The observation of lip prints of five pairs of twins (group 2) resulted in finding that although the lip print patterns of twins were extremely similar; in detail no two of them were exactly identical. Analysis of characteristics of lip prints of two-generations of five families (group 3) was carried out. Lip prints of all children within the five two-generation families possessed the same characteristics of the parents with the exception of two children. Although children showed similar lip grooves as their parents (either father or mother) which might indicate a familial inheritance; the placement of these grooves was in different locations. Therefore, the pattern created was completely different from their parents. Thus lip prints are hereditary yet considered to be individualistic, each possessing their own unique characteristics. The lip prints of the same individuals (group 4) were investigated twice at the interval of 3 months to look for any changes in the pattern over time. The second set of lip prints was identical to the first set. Stability showed by the prints throughout this period suggests the permanence of the lip print.
Discussion
Forensic odontology is a valuable component of forensic investigation in many countries. It involves dentist's participation in assisting legal and criminal issues. The application of dental sciences in criminal and legal investigations gathered momentum in the West during the 1950s and 1960s. Cheiloscopy is analogous to fingerprint analysis, and is a genuine subspeciality of forensic odontology.[7]
Lip prints bring added evidence to a crime scene that can be valuable, especially in cases lacking other evidence, like fingerprints. Lip prints can be a factor in many different kinds of crimes, such as tape when a person has been bound or gagged, prints on a glass that a person drank from, prints on a cigarette butt, and prints on a glass/window if they were pressed up against it. All of these are potential places where lip prints may be found and used in the investigation of a crime. However, the use of lip prints in criminal cases is limited because the credibility of lip prints has not been firmly established in the court system.[6]
Lip print patterns in all 200 subjects were distinct and none of the patterns were identical. This finding was compliance with results obtained in the similar studies conducted earlier by Tsuchihashi and Suzuki[3] and various other authors.[5,8,9] This proves that the lip print pattern is unique to each individual.
Lip print patterns did not simply comprise of one type alone, but appeared as a mixture of varying types as is also the case in a previous study conducted by Tsuchihashi.[3] In this study, type II grooves were most commonly seen followed by Types I′and I. This finding was similar to earlier studies conducted in Indian population.[5] Comparison of lip prints among family members and twins also showed different individual patterns although a few similar grooves could be recognized suggesting a genetic inheritance. This finding is comparable with results of various other studies.[3,10]
To ascertain if lip patterns change with time, we recorded and analyzed the lip prints of 10 males and 10 females once again after 3 months. The lip print patterns were the same as before. This shows that the lip patterns remain unchanged during an individual's lifetime and confirms the permanence of lip prints. Even if environmental factors and pathologies affecting the lips could bring about changes in lip patterns, it has been observed that the lip prints reassume their former pattern on recovery.[3] In fact, only those pathologies that damage the lip subtract like burns seem to rule out the cheiloscopic study.[2]
Sometimes lip prints may be seen as lipstick smears. Lipsticks are complex substances, which have in their constitution, several compounds, oils, or waxes. When searching for lip prints, one must always consider that not all lipstick smears are colored; in fact, in recent years the cosmetic industry has been developing new persistent lipsticks which do not leave a visible smear or mark when they come in contact with different items. However, all lip prints are important, even the ones that are not visible. In fact, this complex process is not restricted to studying visible prints, but also the latent ones. The vermillion border of the lips has minor salivary and sebaceous glands, which, together with the moisturizing from the tongue, leads to the possibility of the existence of latent lip prints. The identification of latent print evidence is often considered the key in solving a crime.[2] Many reagents such as magnetic oxides, aluminum oxides, and fluorescent dyes such asNile blue and Nile red are used to develop latent lip prints similar to fingerprints.[6,11,12] In this manner, latent lip prints should always be considered when processing a crime scene, even if there are no traces of lipstick. Satisfactory identification results by lip prints have been obtained even in sex determination[13] and in postmortem studies.[14]
Where identification is concerned, the mucosal area holds the most interest. This area, also called Klein's zone, is covered with wrinkles and grooves that form a characteristic pattern–the lip print. However, this is not the only area that deserves a careful study. In fact, in cheiloscopy, one should also analyze lip anatomy, considering their thickness and the position. The lips can be horizontal, elevated or depressed and, according to their thickness, it is possible to identify the following four groups: thin lips (common in the European Caucasian); medium lips (from 8 to 10 mm, are the most common type); thick or very thick lips (usually having an inversion of the lip cord and are usually seen in negroes); and mix lips (usually seen in Orientals).[2]
From the above-mentioned findings, it is noteworthy that the data obtained in this study are quite promising as it indicates the uniqueness and permanence of lip prints. Besides, the procedure of lip print analysis is very simple and inexpensive. Therefore, it may be recommended that the lip prints can be used as a reliable aid to human identification in the field of forensic science. However, further studies should be conducted on a large number of individuals of different races, family members, twins, and siblings and for gender determination. In addition, a standard and uniform procedure needs to be put forth for the collection, the development, recording, and computerized analysis of the lip prints.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared
References
- 1.O’Shangnessy PE. Introduction to forensic science. Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45:217–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci. 1974;3:233–48. doi: 10.1016/0300-9432(74)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kasprzak J. Cheiloscopy. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupfer GC, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. 2nd edi. I. London: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 358–61. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Cheiloscopy. Indian J Dent Res. 2001;12:234–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ball J. The current status of lip prints and their use for identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002;20:43–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Acharya AB. Teaching forensic odontology: An opinion on its content and format. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10:137–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kasprazak J. Possibilities of cheiloscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 1990;46:145–51. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2000;71:16–9. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hirth L, Göttsche H, Goedde HW. Lip prints–Variability and genetics. Humangenetik. 1975;30:47–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00273631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Segui MA, Feucht MM, Ponce AC, Pascual F. Persistent lipsticks and their lip prints: New hidden evidence at the crime scene. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;112:41–7. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00173-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Castello A, Alvarez Segui M, Verdu F. Use of fluorescent dyes for developing latent lip prints. Color Technol. 2004;120:184–7. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vahanwala S, Nayak CD, Pagare SS. Study of Lip-prints as aid for sex determination. Medico-Legal Update. 2005;5:7–9. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ustuno H, Kanoh T, Tadokoro O, Inoue K. Preliminary study of post mortem identification using lip prints. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;149:129–32. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]