Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Feb 24;68(Pt 3):m314. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812006174

Dichloridobis(thio­urea-κS)nickel(II)

Hafid Zouihri a,*
PMCID: PMC3297264  PMID: 22412454

Abstract

The title complex, [NiCl2(CH4N2S)2], has been synthesized from the previously reported (diamino­methyl­idene)sulfonium chloride–thio­urea (3/2) salt [Zouihri (2012b ). Acta Cryst. E68, o257]. The NiII ion is coordinated in a distorted tetra­hedral geometry by two mol­ecules of thio­urea [Ni—S = 2.3079 (7) and 2.3177 (6) Å] and two chloride anions [Ni—Cl = 2.2516 (7) and 2.2726 (7) Å]. The bond angles at the Ni atom lie between 96.69 (2) and 115.40 (3)°, while the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the two thio­urea ligands is 6.36 (15)°. The crystal structure is characterized by intra- and inter­molecular N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, which lead to the formation of two-dimensional networks lying parallel to the ab plane. The networks are linked via classical N—H⋯Cl and N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional arrangement.

Related literature  

For the synthesis and the crystal structure of (diamino­methyl­idene)sulfonium chloride thio­urea (3/2), see: Zouihri (2012b ). For related structures, see: Ambujam et al. (2007); Zouihri (2012a ). For related literature on the coordination complexes of NiII salts with thio­urea, see: Asif et al. (2010).graphic file with name e-68-0m314-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [NiCl2(CH4N2S)2]

  • M r = 281.85

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.1578 (3) Å

  • b = 11.8183 (5) Å

  • c = 10.8526 (6) Å

  • β = 103.869 (2)°

  • V = 1015.81 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.79 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.42 × 0.37 × 0.17 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) T min = 0.322, T max = 0.622

  • 4883 measured reflections

  • 1695 independent reflections

  • 1678 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.022

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.017

  • wR(F 2) = 0.045

  • S = 1.08

  • 1695 reflections

  • 132 parameters

  • 10 restraints

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 745 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.069 (10)

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006174/fj2518sup1.cif

e-68-0m314-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006174/fj2518Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m314-Isup2.hkl (83.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1 0.84 (3) 2.60 (3) 3.388 (3) 157 (3)
N1—H1B⋯Cl2i 0.83 (3) 2.56 (3) 3.365 (3) 164 (3)
N2—H2A⋯Cl2i 0.83 (3) 2.75 (3) 3.499 (2) 150 (3)
N2—H2B⋯Cl2ii 0.81 (2) 2.64 (2) 3.432 (2) 166 (3)
N3—H3A⋯Cl1iii 0.86 (3) 2.83 (5) 3.423 (3) 128 (5)
N3—H3B⋯Cl2iv 0.86 (4) 2.47 (4) 3.317 (3) 168 (4)
N4—H4A⋯S2v 0.84 (3) 2.70 (3) 3.366 (2) 137 (3)
N4—H4B⋯Cl1 0.86 (3) 2.60 (3) 3.448 (3) 168 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Unit of Support for Technical and Scientific Research (UATRS, CNRST) for the X-ray measurements.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Nickel(II), which has a d8 configuration, commonly exhibits octahedral, square planar and tetrahedral coordination geometries depending upon the nature of the ligands and the Crystal Field Splitting Parameter value.

In our case, the coordination complexes of Ni(II) salts with thiourea show a variety of compositions and types of coordination (octahedral, tetragonal, square-planar and tetrahedral) (Asif et al. 2010). In general, the predominant coordination geometries for the Ni(II)-Ligand-X (X= Cl-, Br- and I-) are Tetragonal (Ni(II)L4)X2 and Octahedral (Ni(II)L6)X2. Tetrakis coordiantion of thiourea about Nickel Ni(Th)4Cl2 has been found in centered tetragonal symmetry class I4 by K. Ambujam (Ambujam et al. 2007).

In former work we have reported the synthesis and crystal structure of the catena-poly[[chlorido(thiourea-κS)copper(I)]-µ-thiourea-κ2S:S] complexe (Zouihri, 2012a). In this paper we report the crystal structure of [Ni(II)(Th)2] 2Cl- which has been synthetized from the (Diaminomethylidene)sulfonium chloride-thiourea (3/2) (Zouihri, 2012b).

In the title complexe compound, (SCN2H4)2Ni(II)Cl2, The Ni(II) atom is four coordinated in a tetrahedral geometry by two molecules of thiourea (average Ni—S distance = 2.3079 (7) to 2.3177 (6) Å) and two chloride anions (average Ni—Cl distance = 2.2516 (7) to 2.2726 (7) Å) with average (S, Cl)—NiII—(S, Cl) torsion angles between 96.69 (2)° and 115.40 (3)°. The dihedral angle between the two thiourea Ligands is: 6.36 (15)°.

The crystal structure is characterized by intramolecular and intermolecular N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds which lead to the formation of two-dimensional networks lying parallel to the ab plane (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The networks are linked via classical intermolecular N—H···Cl and N—H···S hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional arrangement (Fig. 3 and Table 1).

Experimental

To a 10 ml aqueous solution of NiCl2 (2 mmol) was added 10 ml EtOH solution of (Diaminomethylidene)sulfonium chloride-thiourea (3/2) (Zouihri, 2012b) (1.0 mmol). Colourless crystal were obtained after about one week.

Refinement

All H atoms were located from difference Fourier maps and refined isotropically, with restained distance N—H = 0.86 (2) A.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular view of the title compound showing displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Projection of the title compound along the a axis showing two-dimensional networks lying parallel to the ab plane, H-bonds are represented by dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Projection of the title compound along the b axis showing the three-dimensional arrangement of the title complexe, H-bonds are represented by dashed lines.

Crystal data

[NiCl2(CH4N2S)2] F(000) = 568
Mr = 281.85 Dx = 1.843 Mg m3
Monoclinic, Cc Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C -2yc Cell parameters from 289 reflections
a = 8.1578 (3) Å θ = 1.8–26.7°
b = 11.8183 (5) Å µ = 2.79 mm1
c = 10.8526 (6) Å T = 100 K
β = 103.869 (2)° Prism, colourless
V = 1015.81 (8) Å3 0.42 × 0.37 × 0.17 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD detector diffractometer 1695 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1678 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.022
ω and φ scans θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) h = −9→8
Tmin = 0.322, Tmax = 0.622 k = −14→14
4883 measured reflections l = −13→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017 All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.045 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0205P)2 + 0.1021P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08 (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
1695 reflections Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
132 parameters Δρmin = −0.15 e Å3
10 restraints Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 745 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Flack parameter: 0.069 (10)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.15345 (3) 0.18215 (2) 0.53899 (3) 0.03234 (9)
Cl2 0.03840 (8) 0.33531 (5) 0.61305 (6) 0.03892 (15)
S2 0.33740 (7) 0.22386 (7) 0.41358 (6) 0.04019 (16)
S1 −0.05478 (8) 0.10041 (6) 0.38067 (5) 0.03680 (15)
Cl1 0.26641 (9) 0.06856 (6) 0.70409 (7) 0.04738 (16)
C1 −0.1912 (3) 0.03547 (18) 0.4566 (2) 0.0312 (5)
N1 −0.1424 (3) 0.0014 (2) 0.5748 (2) 0.0427 (5)
N2 −0.3484 (3) 0.0180 (2) 0.3936 (2) 0.0419 (5)
C2 0.5326 (3) 0.2585 (2) 0.5057 (2) 0.0341 (5)
N3 0.6387 (3) 0.3127 (2) 0.4532 (3) 0.0535 (7)
N4 0.5794 (3) 0.2294 (3) 0.6260 (2) 0.0562 (7)
H1A −0.042 (3) −0.001 (3) 0.618 (3) 0.054 (10)*
H2A −0.412 (4) −0.012 (3) 0.434 (3) 0.052 (9)*
H3A 0.597 (8) 0.333 (4) 0.376 (3) 0.13 (2)*
H4A 0.672 (3) 0.255 (3) 0.667 (3) 0.067 (11)*
H1B −0.217 (4) −0.033 (3) 0.599 (3) 0.048 (9)*
H2B −0.392 (4) 0.048 (2) 0.327 (2) 0.039 (8)*
H3B 0.737 (4) 0.327 (4) 0.501 (5) 0.095 (17)*
H4B 0.513 (4) 0.186 (2) 0.656 (3) 0.046 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.02675 (16) 0.03985 (16) 0.03008 (15) −0.00044 (13) 0.00613 (11) −0.00065 (13)
Cl2 0.0308 (3) 0.0446 (3) 0.0418 (3) −0.0015 (2) 0.0094 (3) −0.0120 (3)
S2 0.0226 (3) 0.0721 (4) 0.0250 (3) −0.0055 (3) 0.0039 (2) −0.0010 (3)
S1 0.0339 (3) 0.0500 (4) 0.0255 (3) −0.0108 (3) 0.0052 (2) −0.0026 (3)
Cl1 0.0441 (4) 0.0561 (4) 0.0385 (4) 0.0094 (3) 0.0032 (3) 0.0128 (3)
C1 0.0307 (12) 0.0278 (11) 0.0344 (13) −0.0013 (9) 0.0063 (10) −0.0036 (10)
N1 0.0366 (13) 0.0507 (13) 0.0385 (12) −0.0128 (10) 0.0046 (10) 0.0096 (9)
N2 0.0301 (12) 0.0458 (14) 0.0462 (14) −0.0054 (10) 0.0020 (10) 0.0098 (11)
C2 0.0230 (12) 0.0414 (13) 0.0366 (13) 0.0039 (10) 0.0045 (9) −0.0070 (10)
N3 0.0270 (13) 0.0680 (18) 0.0648 (19) −0.0072 (11) 0.0099 (13) 0.0030 (14)
N4 0.0326 (14) 0.095 (2) 0.0335 (13) −0.0043 (14) −0.0065 (11) −0.0040 (14)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ni1—Cl1 2.2516 (7) N1—H1B 0.822 (18)
Ni1—Cl2 2.2726 (7) N2—H2A 0.840 (19)
Ni1—S2 2.3079 (7) N2—H2B 0.806 (18)
Ni1—S1 2.3177 (6) C2—N3 1.312 (4)
S2—C2 1.715 (2) C2—N4 1.315 (4)
S1—C1 1.716 (2) N3—H3A 0.87 (2)
C1—N1 1.312 (3) N3—H3B 0.86 (2)
C1—N2 1.317 (3) N4—H4A 0.836 (19)
N1—H1A 0.843 (19) N4—H4B 0.865 (19)
Cl1—Ni1—Cl2 108.56 (3) H1A—N1—H1B 120 (3)
Cl1—Ni1—S2 113.37 (3) C1—N2—H2A 116 (3)
Cl2—Ni1—S2 114.86 (3) C1—N2—H2B 124 (2)
Cl1—Ni1—S1 115.40 (3) H2A—N2—H2B 117 (4)
Cl2—Ni1—S1 107.62 (3) N3—C2—N4 119.7 (3)
S2—Ni1—S1 96.69 (2) N3—C2—S2 118.7 (2)
C2—S2—Ni1 110.56 (9) N4—C2—S2 121.6 (2)
C1—S1—Ni1 105.95 (8) C2—N3—H3A 114 (4)
N1—C1—N2 119.3 (2) C2—N3—H3B 117 (4)
N1—C1—S1 121.80 (19) H3A—N3—H3B 128 (6)
N2—C1—S1 118.9 (2) C2—N4—H4A 116 (3)
C1—N1—H1A 126 (3) C2—N4—H4B 118 (3)
C1—N1—H1B 113 (3) H4A—N4—H4B 126 (4)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1 0.84 (3) 2.60 (3) 3.388 (3) 157 (3)
N1—H1B···Cl2i 0.83 (3) 2.56 (3) 3.365 (3) 164 (3)
N2—H2A···Cl2i 0.83 (3) 2.75 (3) 3.499 (2) 150 (3)
N2—H2B···Cl2ii 0.81 (2) 2.64 (2) 3.432 (2) 166 (3)
N3—H3A···Cl1iii 0.86 (3) 2.83 (5) 3.423 (3) 128 (5)
N3—H3B···Cl2iv 0.86 (4) 2.47 (4) 3.317 (3) 168 (4)
N4—H4A···S2v 0.84 (3) 2.70 (3) 3.366 (2) 137 (3)
N4—H4B···Cl1 0.86 (3) 2.60 (3) 3.448 (3) 168 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, y−1/2, z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2518).

References

  1. Ambujam, K., Thomas Preema, C., Aruna, S., Prem Anand, D. & Sagayaraj, P. (2007). Mater. Manuf. Process. 22, 346–350.
  2. Asif, I., Mahmood, R., Stoeckli-Evans, H., Mateen, M. & Ahmad, S. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1393–m1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bruker (2005). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
  9. Zouihri, H. (2012a). Acta Cryst. E68, m260–m261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Zouihri, H. (2012b). Acta Cryst. E68, o257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006174/fj2518sup1.cif

e-68-0m314-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006174/fj2518Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m314-Isup2.hkl (83.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES