Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Feb 29;68(Pt 3):m346–m347. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812005934

Bis{μ-2-[bis­(pyridin-2-yl)methyl­idene]hydrazinecarbothio­amidato}bis­[bromido­copper(II)] methanol disolvate

Roji J Kunnath a, M Sithambaresan b,*, M R Prathapachandra Kurup a, Aiswarya Natarajan a, A Ambili Aravindakshan a
PMCID: PMC3297285  PMID: 22412475

Abstract

In the centrosymmetric binuclear title compound, [Cu2Br2(C12H10N5S)2]·2CH3OH, the CuII ion adopts a slightly dis­torted square-pyramidal coordination geometry. The hydrazine carbothio­amide moiety and one of the pyridyl rings together adopt an almost planar arrangement, with a maximum deviation of 0.052 (4) Å for the C atom of the thio­urea moiety. There are two mol­ecules of methanol solvent per complex in the asymmetric unit. The nonconventional intra­molecular C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds make the mol­ecule more rigid, whereas the conventional N—H⋯N and O—H⋯Br inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding inter­actions, supported with N—H⋯π inter­actions, establish a supra­molecular linkage among the mol­ecules in the crystal. An intermolecular C—H⋯O inter­action is also present.

Related literature  

For the biological applications of multinuclear copper complexes of hydrazinecarbothio­amide, see: Moubaraki et al. (1998); Khan et al. (1985). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Philip et al. (2006). For related structures of dimeric copper complexes of hydrazinecarbothio­amide, see: Ainscough et al. (1991); Philip et al. (2005). For related literature, see: Duan et al. (1996).graphic file with name e-68-0m346-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Cu2Br2(C12H10N5S)2]·2CH4O

  • M r = 863.62

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.3052 (7) Å

  • b = 9.2120 (7) Å

  • c = 11.0500 (9) Å

  • α = 68.341 (2)°

  • β = 79.127 (3)°

  • γ = 84.913 (2)°

  • V = 771.45 (11) Å3

  • Z = 1

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.15 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker AXS Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) T min = 0.300, T max = 0.354

  • 11266 measured reflections

  • 2688 independent reflections

  • 2374 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.065

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.094

  • S = 1.08

  • 2688 reflections

  • 209 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.48 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: APEX2/SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT/XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005934/fj2511sup1.cif

e-68-0m346-sup1.cif (23.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005934/fj2511Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m346-Isup2.hkl (132KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg4 is the centroid of the N2/C7–C11 ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯Br1i 0.82 2.58 3.396 (4) 178
N5—H5A⋯N4ii 0.84 (2) 2.17 (2) 3.006 (4) 177 (5)
C4—H4⋯O1iii 0.93 2.44 3.281 (5) 151
C11—H11⋯Br1iv 0.93 2.86 3.573 (4) 135
C1—H1⋯Br1 0.93 2.91 3.450 (4) 119
N5—H5BCg4ii 0.84 (2) 2.71 (4) 3.310 (4) 129 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

RJK is grateful to University Grants Commision, New Delhi, India, for the award of a Senior Research Fellowship. AN and AAA are grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, for financial support in the form of Junior Research Fellowships. The authors are grateful to the Sophisticated Analytical Instument Facility, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi-22, for providing single-crystal X-ray diffraction data.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Hydrazinecarbothioamides have been reported to have a great variety of biological activity. In most cases, the metal complexes show more activity compared to their metal free ligands (Moubaraki et al., 1998). Coupled systems of transition metal complexes are of special interest in various fields of science. The main reason probably is due to the phenomenon of interaction between metal centers lying at the crossover point of two widely separated areas, namely the physics of the magnetic materials and the role of polynuclear reaction sites in biological processes (Khan et al., 1985).

The title complex [Cu2Br2(C12H10N5S)2].2(CH3OH) has a dimeric structure. The coordination geometry around each copper(II) ion is square pyramidal with a slight distortion (τ = 0.03). The S1 atom of the hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety, the imino N3 atom, pyridine N1 atom and the Br1 atom comprise the basal plane while the apical position is occupied by the N2A atom of the symmetry related half of the dimer with a longest bond length to the metal atom of 2.529 (3) Å. The hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety of the free ligand shows E configuration about the both C12–N4 and C6–N3 (Ainscough et al., 1991; Philip et al., 2005) whereas in the CuII complex the coordinated hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety has E configuration with respect to C6–N3 and Z configuration about C12–N4. The atoms coordinated to metal centre found to exist in E configuration having N3 and N1 atoms cis to each other with respect to C5—C6 bond. A unique part of the CuII complex and the dimeric unit generated by the association of the free pyridyl nitrogen with the Cu atom are shown along with the atom-labeling in Fig. 1 and 2 respectively. The two aromatic rings are twisted with a dihedral angle of 88.1 (2)° between the rings. The hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety and one of the pyridine ring comprising atoms C1—C6 and N1 are almost planar with maximum deviation of 0.052 (4) Å for the atom C12 of the ring. C12–S1 bond distance (1.727 (4) Å) is very close to the single bond (Duan et al., 1996) which suggests that the ligand is coordinated in the thiolate form. This phenomenon could also be further confirmed by the coplanar nature of the NH2 group of the coordinated ligand with sp2 character wich facilitates an extended conjugation of the hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety with the aromatic rings.

The intramolecular non-classical hydrogen bonding interactions (C1–H1···Br1 and C11–H11···Br1), Table 1, makes the complex more rigid. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions (classical and non-classical) establish a supramolecular 1-D network by linking the adjacent molecules through the methanol present in the lattice and N—H···N in parallel fashion as shown in Fig. 3. Packing of the molecules also involves many very weak π..π interactions with centroid-centroid distances in the range 3.707 (2)–5.778 (2). However, there is an N—H···π interaction between the hydrogen attached at N5 atom and one of the pyridyl ring comprising atoms from C7—C11 and N2 of another molecule and also a lone-pair···π interaction between the Br1 atom and two different chelate rings comprising atoms Cu1, S1, C12, N3, N4 and Cu1, N1, N3, C5, C6.

Experimental

The title complex was prepared by adapting a reported procedure (Philip et al., 2006) by refluxing a mixture of methanolic solutions of 2-[di(pyridin-2-yl)methylidene]hydrazinecarbothioamide (2.573 g, 10 mmol) and CuBr2 (2.230 g, 10 mmol) for four hours. Black colored crystals were collected, washed with few drops of methanol and dried over P4O10in vacuo. Single crystals of the title complex suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation from its methanolic solution.

Refinement

All H atoms on C were placed in calculated positions, guided by difference maps, with C—H bond distances 0.93–0.96 Å. H atoms were assigned as Uiso=1.2 Ueq (1.5 for Me). N5—H5A and N5—H5B H atoms were located from difference maps and restrained using DFIX instructions. The O1—H1A (0.82 Å) hydrogen of the methanol solvent is also placed in calculated position guided by difference maps.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

ORTEP view of the unique part of the Cu complex, drawn with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids for the non-H atoms.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the dimeric unit generated by the association of one of the pyridyl N of the ligand with the Cu atom of an adjacent molecule. The weak metal-axial ligand interaction is represented by dashed lines. Non-H atoms are drawn with 50% probability ellipsoids. The H atoms in the complex are omitted for clarity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Hydrogen-bonding interactions showing an infinite chain in the crystal structure of [Cu2Br2(C12 H10 N5 S)2].2(C H3 OH).

Crystal data

[Cu2Br2(C12H10N5S)2]·2CH4O Z = 1
Mr = 863.62 F(000) = 430.0
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.859 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.3052 (7) Å Cell parameters from 7050 reflections
b = 9.2120 (7) Å θ = 2.4–28.3°
c = 11.0500 (9) Å µ = 4.15 mm1
α = 68.341 (2)° T = 296 K
β = 79.127 (3)° Block, black
γ = 84.913 (2)° 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm
V = 771.45 (11) Å3

Data collection

Bruker AXS Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer 2688 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2374 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.065
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1 θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.4°
ω and φ scan h = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) k = −9→10
Tmin = 0.300, Tmax = 0.354 l = −13→13
11266 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.094 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0351P)2 + 0.9038P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2688 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
209 parameters Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.48 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.58511 (5) −0.08863 (4) 0.69095 (4) 0.04060 (15)
Cu1 0.47922 (5) 0.17346 (5) 0.59664 (4) 0.03332 (15)
S1 0.22214 (12) 0.12075 (11) 0.70508 (10) 0.0434 (3)
O1 0.7785 (5) 0.7271 (5) 0.9538 (4) 0.0823 (12)
H1A 0.7308 0.7735 0.8912 0.123*
N1 0.6759 (3) 0.2576 (3) 0.4581 (3) 0.0299 (6)
N2 0.4272 (3) 0.7176 (3) 0.2495 (3) 0.0302 (6)
N3 0.3754 (3) 0.3618 (3) 0.4794 (3) 0.0238 (6)
N4 0.2129 (3) 0.3997 (3) 0.5030 (3) 0.0294 (6)
N5 −0.0218 (4) 0.3210 (4) 0.6483 (3) 0.0417 (8)
C1 0.8282 (4) 0.2004 (5) 0.4516 (4) 0.0379 (9)
H1 0.8526 0.1102 0.5197 0.045*
C2 0.9519 (5) 0.2690 (5) 0.3480 (4) 0.0465 (10)
H2 1.0579 0.2269 0.3470 0.056*
C3 0.9154 (5) 0.3999 (5) 0.2473 (4) 0.0445 (10)
H3 0.9964 0.4475 0.1758 0.053*
C4 0.7571 (5) 0.4617 (5) 0.2518 (4) 0.0360 (8)
H4 0.7305 0.5510 0.1838 0.043*
C5 0.6401 (4) 0.3882 (4) 0.3587 (3) 0.0268 (7)
C6 0.4688 (4) 0.4423 (4) 0.3730 (3) 0.0248 (7)
C7 0.4119 (4) 0.5710 (4) 0.2597 (3) 0.0248 (7)
C8 0.3584 (5) 0.5319 (4) 0.1652 (4) 0.0384 (9)
H8 0.3479 0.4276 0.1771 0.046*
C9 0.3207 (5) 0.6484 (5) 0.0535 (4) 0.0433 (10)
H9 0.2855 0.6248 −0.0122 0.052*
C10 0.3360 (5) 0.7995 (4) 0.0412 (4) 0.0377 (9)
H10 0.3116 0.8812 −0.0334 0.045*
C11 0.3880 (5) 0.8296 (4) 0.1402 (4) 0.0372 (9)
H11 0.3965 0.9332 0.1310 0.045*
C12 0.1364 (4) 0.2936 (4) 0.6108 (3) 0.0288 (7)
C13 0.8997 (8) 0.8191 (8) 0.9536 (7) 0.0809 (17)
H13A 0.8666 0.8600 1.0230 0.121*
H13B 0.9186 0.9039 0.8700 0.121*
H13C 0.9988 0.7578 0.9675 0.121*
H5A −0.074 (5) 0.401 (4) 0.608 (4) 0.058 (14)*
H5B −0.078 (5) 0.261 (4) 0.718 (3) 0.053 (14)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.0512 (3) 0.0267 (2) 0.0425 (3) 0.01050 (16) −0.01669 (19) −0.00917 (17)
Cu1 0.0283 (3) 0.0284 (3) 0.0318 (3) 0.00663 (18) −0.00458 (19) 0.00051 (19)
S1 0.0334 (5) 0.0364 (5) 0.0404 (6) 0.0031 (4) −0.0012 (4) 0.0062 (4)
O1 0.070 (3) 0.089 (3) 0.072 (3) −0.014 (2) −0.023 (2) −0.002 (2)
N1 0.0262 (15) 0.0315 (16) 0.0310 (16) 0.0048 (12) −0.0072 (12) −0.0103 (13)
N2 0.0306 (16) 0.0280 (16) 0.0283 (16) 0.0002 (12) −0.0047 (13) −0.0061 (12)
N3 0.0202 (14) 0.0251 (14) 0.0256 (14) 0.0027 (11) −0.0054 (11) −0.0084 (11)
N4 0.0260 (15) 0.0281 (15) 0.0283 (15) 0.0045 (12) −0.0048 (12) −0.0045 (12)
N5 0.0282 (17) 0.042 (2) 0.0375 (19) 0.0030 (15) 0.0036 (15) 0.0003 (16)
C1 0.0269 (19) 0.040 (2) 0.042 (2) 0.0102 (16) −0.0082 (17) −0.0107 (17)
C2 0.028 (2) 0.052 (3) 0.055 (3) 0.0104 (18) −0.0033 (19) −0.018 (2)
C3 0.029 (2) 0.053 (3) 0.047 (2) −0.0023 (17) 0.0049 (18) −0.018 (2)
C4 0.034 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.033 (2) −0.0006 (16) −0.0025 (16) −0.0095 (16)
C5 0.0275 (18) 0.0287 (17) 0.0272 (18) 0.0022 (13) −0.0070 (14) −0.0128 (14)
C6 0.0267 (18) 0.0222 (16) 0.0251 (17) 0.0011 (13) −0.0067 (14) −0.0074 (14)
C7 0.0202 (16) 0.0259 (17) 0.0229 (16) 0.0010 (13) −0.0013 (13) −0.0042 (13)
C8 0.049 (2) 0.0285 (19) 0.040 (2) 0.0026 (16) −0.0159 (18) −0.0121 (16)
C9 0.050 (2) 0.049 (2) 0.034 (2) 0.0027 (19) −0.0166 (18) −0.0155 (18)
C10 0.042 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.0258 (19) 0.0055 (16) −0.0116 (16) −0.0002 (15)
C11 0.047 (2) 0.0259 (18) 0.033 (2) 0.0012 (16) −0.0087 (17) −0.0031 (15)
C12 0.0238 (17) 0.0317 (18) 0.0287 (18) 0.0032 (14) −0.0054 (14) −0.0087 (15)
C13 0.077 (4) 0.087 (4) 0.092 (4) 0.006 (3) −0.024 (3) −0.045 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Br1—Cu1 2.4084 (5) C2—C3 1.363 (6)
Cu1—N3 1.982 (3) C2—H2 0.9300
Cu1—N1 2.005 (3) C3—C4 1.385 (5)
Cu1—S1 2.2404 (11) C3—H3 0.9300
S1—C12 1.727 (3) C4—C5 1.376 (5)
O1—C13 1.371 (7) C4—H4 0.9300
O1—H1A 0.8200 C5—C6 1.464 (5)
N1—C1 1.326 (4) C6—C7 1.492 (4)
N1—C5 1.351 (4) C7—C8 1.378 (5)
N2—C7 1.329 (4) C8—C9 1.372 (5)
N2—C11 1.341 (5) C8—H8 0.9300
N3—C6 1.284 (4) C9—C10 1.363 (6)
N3—N4 1.365 (4) C9—H9 0.9300
N4—C12 1.320 (4) C10—C11 1.373 (5)
N5—C12 1.333 (5) C10—H10 0.9300
N5—H5A 0.837 (19) C11—H11 0.9300
N5—H5B 0.843 (19) C13—H13A 0.9600
C1—C2 1.379 (6) C13—H13B 0.9600
C1—H1 0.9300 C13—H13C 0.9600
N3—Cu1—N1 81.17 (11) N1—C5—C4 121.6 (3)
N3—Cu1—S1 83.78 (8) N1—C5—C6 115.1 (3)
N1—Cu1—S1 163.80 (9) C4—C5—C6 123.3 (3)
N3—Cu1—Br1 162.00 (8) N3—C6—C5 115.6 (3)
N1—Cu1—Br1 97.02 (8) N3—C6—C7 125.0 (3)
S1—Cu1—Br1 95.45 (3) C5—C6—C7 118.9 (3)
C12—S1—Cu1 95.59 (12) N2—C7—C8 123.3 (3)
C13—O1—H1A 109.5 N2—C7—C6 118.5 (3)
C1—N1—C5 118.6 (3) C8—C7—C6 118.1 (3)
C1—N1—Cu1 128.9 (3) C9—C8—C7 119.3 (3)
C5—N1—Cu1 112.5 (2) C9—C8—H8 120.3
C7—N2—C11 116.4 (3) C7—C8—H8 120.3
C6—N3—N4 121.0 (3) C10—C9—C8 118.2 (4)
C6—N3—Cu1 115.6 (2) C10—C9—H9 120.9
N4—N3—Cu1 123.3 (2) C8—C9—H9 120.9
C12—N4—N3 111.1 (3) C9—C10—C11 119.2 (3)
C12—N5—H5A 124 (3) C9—C10—H10 120.4
C12—N5—H5B 123 (3) C11—C10—H10 120.4
H5A—N5—H5B 113 (4) N2—C11—C10 123.5 (4)
N1—C1—C2 122.8 (4) N2—C11—H11 118.2
N1—C1—H1 118.6 C10—C11—H11 118.2
C2—C1—H1 118.6 N4—C12—N5 117.0 (3)
C3—C2—C1 118.6 (4) N4—C12—S1 125.8 (3)
C3—C2—H2 120.7 N5—C12—S1 117.2 (3)
C1—C2—H2 120.7 O1—C13—H13A 109.5
C2—C3—C4 119.7 (4) O1—C13—H13B 109.5
C2—C3—H3 120.2 H13A—C13—H13B 109.5
C4—C3—H3 120.2 O1—C13—H13C 109.5
C5—C4—C3 118.7 (4) H13A—C13—H13C 109.5
C5—C4—H4 120.7 H13B—C13—H13C 109.5
C3—C4—H4 120.7
N3—Cu1—S1—C12 −4.96 (14) C3—C4—C5—N1 −0.5 (5)
N1—Cu1—S1—C12 −26.6 (3) C3—C4—C5—C6 −179.3 (3)
Br1—Cu1—S1—C12 −166.89 (12) N4—N3—C6—C5 −179.2 (3)
N3—Cu1—N1—C1 179.6 (3) Cu1—N3—C6—C5 −3.8 (4)
S1—Cu1—N1—C1 −158.5 (3) N4—N3—C6—C7 −6.7 (5)
Br1—Cu1—N1—C1 −18.4 (3) Cu1—N3—C6—C7 168.7 (2)
N3—Cu1—N1—C5 −2.2 (2) N1—C5—C6—N3 1.9 (4)
S1—Cu1—N1—C5 19.7 (5) C4—C5—C6—N3 −179.3 (3)
Br1—Cu1—N1—C5 159.8 (2) N1—C5—C6—C7 −171.0 (3)
N1—Cu1—N3—C6 3.3 (2) C4—C5—C6—C7 7.8 (5)
S1—Cu1—N3—C6 −170.7 (2) C11—N2—C7—C8 −0.3 (5)
Br1—Cu1—N3—C6 −82.2 (3) C11—N2—C7—C6 174.3 (3)
N1—Cu1—N3—N4 178.6 (3) N3—C6—C7—N2 99.6 (4)
S1—Cu1—N3—N4 4.6 (2) C5—C6—C7—N2 −88.2 (4)
Br1—Cu1—N3—N4 93.1 (3) N3—C6—C7—C8 −85.5 (4)
C6—N3—N4—C12 173.7 (3) C5—C6—C7—C8 86.7 (4)
Cu1—N3—N4—C12 −1.3 (4) N2—C7—C8—C9 1.0 (6)
C5—N1—C1—C2 0.3 (6) C6—C7—C8—C9 −173.6 (3)
Cu1—N1—C1—C2 178.4 (3) C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.8 (6)
N1—C1—C2—C3 −1.0 (6) C8—C9—C10—C11 −0.1 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.8 (6) C7—N2—C11—C10 −0.7 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.1 (6) C9—C10—C11—N2 0.9 (6)
C1—N1—C5—C4 0.4 (5) N3—N4—C12—N5 176.8 (3)
Cu1—N1—C5—C4 −178.0 (3) N3—N4—C12—S1 −4.8 (4)
C1—N1—C5—C6 179.3 (3) Cu1—S1—C12—N4 7.2 (3)
Cu1—N1—C5—C6 0.9 (3) Cu1—S1—C12—N5 −174.4 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Cg4 is the centroid of the N2/C7–C11 ring.

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1A···Br1i 0.82 2.58 3.396 (4) 178
N5—H5A···N4ii 0.84 (2) 2.17 (2) 3.006 (4) 177 (5)
C4—H4···O1iii 0.93 2.44 3.281 (5) 151
C11—H11···Br1iv 0.93 2.86 3.573 (4) 135
C1—H1···Br1 0.93 2.91 3.450 (4) 119
N5—H5B···Cg4ii 0.84 (2) 2.71 (4) 3.310 (4) 129 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x, y, z−1; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2511).

References

  1. Ainscough, E. W., Brodie, A. M., Ranford, J. D. & Waters, J. M. (1991). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1737–1742.
  2. Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Bruker (2004). APEX2, SAINT, XPREP and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Duan, C.-Y., Wu, B.-M. & Mak, T. C. W. (1996). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3485–3490.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  6. Khan, O. (1985). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 24, 834–850.
  7. Moubaraki, B., Murray, K. S., Ranford, J. D., Wang, X. & Xu, Y. (1998). Chem. Commun. pp. 353–354.
  8. Philip, V., Suni, V., Kurup, M. R. P. & Nethaji, M. (2005). Polyhedron, 24, 1133–1142.
  9. Philip, V., Suni, V., Kurup, M. R. P. & Nethaji, M. (2006). Polyhedron, 25, 1931–1938.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005934/fj2511sup1.cif

e-68-0m346-sup1.cif (23.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005934/fj2511Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m346-Isup2.hkl (132KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES