Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2011 Dec 7;279(1734):1740–1747. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2060

Metabolic cold adaptation in fishes occurs at the level of whole animal, mitochondria and enzyme

Craig R White 1,*, Lesley A Alton 1, Peter B Frappell 2
PMCID: PMC3297453  PMID: 22158960

Abstract

Metabolic cold adaptation (MCA), the hypothesis that species from cold climates have relatively higher metabolic rates than those from warm climates, was first proposed nearly 100 years ago and remains one of the most controversial hypotheses in physiological ecology. In the present study, we test the MCA hypothesis in fishes at the level of whole animal, mitochondria and enzyme. In support of the MCA hypothesis, we find that when normalized to a common temperature, species with ranges that extend to high latitude (cooler climates) have high aerobic enzyme (citrate synthase) activity, high rates of mitochondrial respiration and high standard metabolic rates. Metabolic compensation for the global temperature gradient is not complete however, so when measured at their habitat temperature species from high latitude have lower absolute rates of metabolism than species from low latitudes. Evolutionary adaptation and thermal plasticity are therefore insufficient to completely overcome the acute thermodynamic effects of temperature, at least in fishes.

Keywords: metabolic cold adaptation, metabolic rate, climate, plasticity, citrate synthase, mitochondria

1. Introduction

Understanding the factors that influence the metabolic rate (MR) of animals has been a key focus of animal physiology for over 100 years [1,2]. Much effort has been expended on describing the allometric scaling of MR with body mass [25] and on attempting to explain why MR scales allometrically [5,6], but the relationship between MR and body mass conceals considerable variation, and species of similar mass can vary in MR by more than an order of magnitude [4]. That species vary by so much suggests that such variation is important, and inter-individual and interspecific differences in MR are correlated with differences in juvenile survival [7], starvation resistance [8], reproductive output [9] and a range of other life-history traits [1012].

Despite the clear importance of MR, however, the ultimate factors that drive its evolution remain incompletely understood. Insects and endotherms from cold environments have been shown to have relatively high MRs [1316], a phenomenon known as metabolic cold adaption (MCA) [17,18] or Krogh's rule [19]. MCA is an example of countergradient variation, a geographical pattern of genotypes where genetic influences on a trait oppose environmental influences, thereby minimizing phenotypic patterns along a gradient [20]. In ectotherms, the negative relationship between MR and the temperature of the environment in which an animal lives acts to partially or wholly compensate for the positive thermodynamic effect of temperature on MR. In contrast to the situation in terrestrial animals, for aquatic animals MCA has variously been described as a myth [21], an experimental artefact [18,22], and one of the most controversial hypotheses in physiological ecology [23,24].

For fishes, interspecific studies of MR show mixed support for MCA [17,18,22,23,25,26], while studies at other levels of organization have revealed patterns consistent with MCA. The activities of enzymes associated with energy metabolism are typically higher in species from polar and temperate environments than in those from tropical environments [27,28], and mitochondrial volume density is relatively high in the muscles of Antarctic fishes [29,30]. Given that mitochondrial proton leak contributes a significant proportion of resting MR [31,32], it seems reasonable to predict that MR should be higher in cold-adapted animals because of their high muscle mitochondrial densities [33], making it surprising that such a pattern is not always documented.

In the present study, we adopt an integrative approach to re-evaluate the MCA hypothesis in fishes at multiple levels of biological organization. In doing so, we address several criticisms of previous tests of MCA [22,23]. We selected data according to rigorously defined criteria and account for methodological differences between studies, and, where appropriate, account for the phylogenetic non-independence of closely related species [3437]. We test the MCA hypothesis by relating the highest latitudinal extreme of a species' range to standard metabolic rate (SMR), the activity of isolated mitochondria, and the activity of a key metabolic enzyme (citrate synthase, which controls flux through the citric acid cycle).

2. Methods

Data for body mass (g), rate of oxygen consumption (V̇O2, ml min−1, an indirect measure of MR, n = 37 species; electronic supplementary material, table S1), white muscle citrate synthase activity (µmol g−1 min−1, n = 54 measurements of 49 species; electronic supplementary material, table S2), and state III rate of respiration of muscle mitochondria using pyruvate as a substrate or heart mitochondria using pyruvate and malate as a substrate (µmol g−1 min−1, n = 24 measurements of 23 species; electronic supplementary material, table S3) were obtained from a range of published sources (see the electronic supplementary material). Data were included only if measured at a known temperature.

For V̇O2, care was taken to include data conforming to the conditions specified for the measurement of SMR (all animals were post-absorptive and non-reproductive). Prior to measurement of SMR, animals were fasted for a median of 3 days (range: 3 h to 14 days) and acclimated to a known temperature, usually close to the temperature at which they were measured, for a median of 14 days (range 1 day to 1 year). These fast and acclimation durations were considered appropriate by the authors of the primary data, and we test for a relationship between SMR and fast duration or acclimation duration to ensure that short durations do not compromise the analyses (see §3). Where data for a range of temperatures were provided, a value close to habitat temperature was selected if possible, or a value at the mid-point of the temperature range. Data for anaesthetized, restrained or surgically instrumented individuals were excluded, as were SMR data estimated by extrapolating a relationship between swimming speed and V̇O2. V̇O2 data measured using closed-box respirometry were excluded, because the measurements may overestimate V̇O2 [22,38]. The temperature at which fishes were maintained prior to SMR measurement was provided for all species, and was strongly correlated with the temperature at which they were measured (r > 0.99, mean absolute difference between measurement and acclimation temperatures = 0.2°C, range 0–1.5°C). For each species, the highest latitudinal extreme of the range was determined using data from FishBase [39]. Salinity was scored on an ordinal scale (freshwater = 0, brackish = 1, marine = 2) with fishes assigned to multiple categories in FishBase given the mean category value. The environment usually occupied by each species was also noted (bathypelagic, bathydemersal, benthopelagic, demersal, reef-associated or pelagic), as was the hemisphere into which their range extends the furthest (Northern or Southern). The coarse relationship between latitude and the temperature to which animals are exposed may limit the reliability of conclusions about MCA based upon the relationship between SMR and latitude owing to variation in temperature between habitats at the same latitude [40]. However, in a broad-scale comparison, such as the present study, it is important only that, on average, higher latitudes are colder than warm ones, not that latitude is a precise estimate of temperature [41].

Where data for SMR were available for individuals of a range of body sizes of a single species, only data for the largest were included to minimize the influence of growth on SMR. Multiple measurements of mitochondrial respiration or citrate synthase activity for a single species were included by placing them in very short branches (0.001) [42]. Where data for a given trait were available for a range of temperatures, temperature dependence was determined as Q10 = e10b, where b is the slope of the line relating ln(Trait) and temperature. A mean Q10 value for each trait was then calculated (mitochondrial respiration: 2.2 ± 0.5 (s.d.), n = 14; Q10 for citrate synthase was assumed to be 2 and that of SMR to be 2.4 [23]). Data for SMR and mitochondrial respiration were then normalized to a temperature of 20°C and data for citrate synthase activity were normalized to a temperature of 10°C (most measurements of citrate synthase activity were made at this temperature), using the appropriate value of Q10. SMR at temperature 1 (T1, 10 or 20°C) was calculated from SMR at measurement temperature (Tm) according to:

2.

This temperature normalization procedure has been used previously in other comparative studies of MCA [13], and, in the present study, was preferred to a multiple regression approach, including both measurement temperature and absolute latitude as predictors of log(trait), because fishes tend to be acclimated to, and measured at, temperatures broadly representative of their habitat temperature, so measurement temperature and latitude are strongly correlated (SMR: r = −0.85, p < 0.0001; mitochondrial respiration: r = −0.77, p < 0.0001). Such collinearity can result in spurious conclusions about the relationship between the dependent and independent variables, because the partial regression coefficients associated with the independent variables may not be representative of the relationship that exists in the population [43].

Data were analysed using phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) [4446] in the Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution package within R [47,48] according to established procedures and using published code [49,50]. An appropriate tree is not available for the species in the present study, so informal supertrees were constructed using data from established sources (see the electronic supplementary material). Because the branch lengths in the informal supertrees are unknown, a range of branch length transformations were compared: star (non-phylogenetic), punctuated (all branches set equal and equal to 1), Grafen's [44], Nee's [51] and Pagel's [52]. For each of these models, a measure of phylogenetic correlation, λ [36,53], was estimated by fitting PGLS models with different values of λ and finding the value that maximizes the log likelihood. The degree to which trait evolution deviates from Brownian motion (λ = 1) was accommodated by modifying the covariance matrix using the maximum-likelihood value of λ, which is a multiplier of the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix (i.e. those quantifying the degree of relatedness between species). Alternative models were compared on the basis of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) as a measure of model fit [54,55]. The relative support of alternative models was compared on the basis of its Akaike weight (wi, the relative-likelihood of the model compared with all others: the likelihood of the model divided by the sum of the likelihoods of all other models) and Δi (i.e. AIC – minimum AIC; models having Δi ≤ 2 have substantial support, those where 4 ≤ Δi ≤ 7 have considerably less support, while models having Δi > 10 have essentially no support [54]).

For all traits, the approach taken was to compare statistical models that incorporated absolute latitude as a predictor with those that did not. All traits were log-transformed for analysis. Log(body mass) was included as a covariate for SMR, but not for mitochondrial respiration and citrase synthase activity. For those species for which body mass data were available, log(body mass) was not a significant predictor of log(mitochondrial respiration) or log(citrate synthase activity; p > 0.05 in both cases). For citrate synthase activity, log-transformed maximum depth of occurrence was also included as a covariate [56]. For mitochondrial activity, tissue type (muscle or heart) was included as a fixed factor.

3. Results

(a). SMR

The best-fit model for Q10-normalized SMR included body mass and absolute latitude (table 1; electronic supplementary material, table S4) and modelled evolution on a tree with Nee's arbitrary branch lengths and λ set equal to 1 (table 2; electronic supplementary material, table S4). The scaling exponent of SMR was 0.80, similar to other values for fishes [4,57], and SMR was positively related to latitude (table 3 and figure 1a). Models excluding latitude were less well supported than equivalent phylogenetic or non-phylogenetic models, including latitude; the change in AIC (Δi) associated with removing latitude from a given model was always greater than 4. AIC changed by less than 2 when acclimation temperature (Δi = −1.3), log-transformed acclimation duration (Δi = −0.7), acclimation temperature + log-transformed acclimation duration (Δi = 0.3), log-transformed fast duration (Δi = 1.5), measurement method (intermittent or continuous flow, Δi = −0.7) and salinity (Δi = 1.2) were added to the best (evolutionary + statistical) model. Adding environment increased AIC (Δi = 7.5), whereas including hemisphere of origin (Northern or Southern Hemisphere) decreased AIC (Δi = −3.0; Southern Hemisphere species had a lower SMR than Northern Hemisphere species; table 3) but the effect appeared to be driven by low SMRs in just two Southern Hemisphere species (figure 1a): short-finned eels Anguilla australis [58] and spotted stargazers Genyagnus monopterygius [59]. Including hemisphere of origin and an interaction between latitude and hemisphere of origin increased AIC (Δi = −1.1).

Table 1.

Akaike weights for statistical models for standard metabolic rate (SMR), mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity, summed over all evolutionary models.

statistical model Σwi
Q10-normalized SMRa
 logM 0.01
 logM + latitude 0.99
SMR
 logM + temp 0.59
 logM + temp + latitude 0.41
Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration
 intercept only 0.11
 tissue 0.12
 latitude 0.31
 tissue + latitude 0.46
mitochondrial respiration
 temp 0.39
 temp + tissue 0.32
 temp + latitude 0.15
 temp + tissue + latitude 0.14
citrate synthase activity
 log(depth) 0.001
 latitude 0.001
 log(depth) + latitude 0.10
 log(depth) + latitude + environment 0.89

aNote that AIC decreased further when hemispere of origin was added to the best single model for Q10-normalized SMR (see text for details).

Table 2.

Values of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) for evolutionary models (with λ = 0,1, or taking the maximum likelihood (ML) value) for Q10-normalized standard metabolic rate (SMR), Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration, and Q10-normalized citrate synthase (CS) activity. (Evolutionary models are for the best-fit statistical models from tables 1 and 3.)

evolutionary model SMR
mitochondrial respiration
CS activity
λ AIC λ AIC λ AIC
star 0 −2.98 0 6.01 0 −6.5
Grafen ML = 0 −0.98 ML = 0 8.01 ML = 0.39 −6.0
1 6.27 1 32.9 1 18
Nee ML = 1 −2.33 ML = 0 8.01 ML = 0.40 −7.5
1 −4.33 1 17.0 1 −3.5
Pagel ML = 0.97 −2.03 ML = 0 8.01 ML = 0.37 −6.0
1 −3.97 1 24.6 1 0.1
punctuated ML = 0 −0.98 ML = 1 7.04 ML = 0 −4.5
1 −2.61 1 5.04 1 4.2

Table 3.

Parameter estimates for the best-fit (statistical + evolutionary) models for standard metabolic rate (SMR), mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity.

term estimate s.e.
Q10-normalized SMR
 intercept −1.14 0.17
 logM 0.80 0.03
 latitude 0.008 0.002
 hemisphere: southern −0.22 0.10
SMRa
 intercept −1.03 0.18
 logM 0.78 0.03
 temperatureb 0.016 0.005
Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration
 intercept 1.56 0.22
 latitude 0.006 0.003
 tissue: red muscle −0.19 0.11
mitochondrial respiration
 intercept 1.49 0.08
 temperature 0.017 0.005
citrate synthase activity
 intercept −0.30 0.17
 log(depth) −0.29 0.06
 latitude 0.015 0.003
 environment: pelagic 0.28 0.10
 environment: demersal −0.12 0.08

aThe best (statistical + evolutionary) model for SMR modelled evolution on a tree with all branch lengths set equal to 1, with λ set equal to 1 (wi = 0.16).

bA parameter estimate of 0.016 for the temperature dependence of log-transformed SMR is equivalent to an across species value of Q10 of 1.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.11–1.85).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Relationships between absolute latitude and (a) standard metabolic rate (SMR), (b) mitochondrial respiration, and (c) citrate synthase activity. Data are normalized to measurement temperatures of 20°C (SMR and mitochondrial respiration) or 10°C (citrate synthase activity). Solid lines are the associations between the various traits and latitude from table 3. Because Q10-normalized SMR is positively related to body mass (table 3), and citrate synthase activity is positively related to maximum depth of occurrence (table 3), residuals are presented (i.e. measured – predicted). The best model for SMR included hemisphere of origin (table 3), so SMR data are shown for Northern Hemisphere (filled circles) and Southern Hemisphere (unfilled circles).

If the collinearity of latitude and measurement temperature was ignored and models including both temperature and latitude considered as predictors of non-Q10-normalized SMR, latitude was not included in the best model for SMR (tables 1 and 3; electronic supplementary material, table S5).

(b). Mitochondrial respiration

The best-fit model for Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration modelled evolution on a phylogeny with all branch lengths equal to 1, with λ set at 1 (table 2; electronic supplementary material, table S6), and included latitude and tissue type as predictors (table 1; electronic supplementary material, table S6). The relationship between latitude and Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration was positive (table 3 and figure 1b). Removing latitude from a given model always increased AIC (Δi = 0.9–4.8). Removing latitude from the best model increased AIC by 1.8. AIC increased when salinity (Δi = 6.1) or environment (Δi = 8.5) were added to the best (evolutionary + statistical) model for Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration. If the collinearity of latitude and measurement temperature was ignored and models including both temperature and latitude considered as predictors of non-Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration, the best model included only measurement temperature and modelled evolution on a star phylogeny (tables 1 and 3; electronic supplementary material, table S7). AIC increased when environment was added to the best (evolutionary + statistical) model for non-Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration (Δi = 3.7), when hemisphere of origin was added to the best model (Δi = 0.7), and when hemisphere of origin and an interaction between hemisphere of origin and latitude was added (Δi = 7.6), but decreased when salinity was added (Δi = −0.6), although the effect of salinity was not significant (p = 0.13).

(c). Citrate synthase activity

Summed over all evolutionary models, the best statistical model for Q10-normalized citrate synthase activity included log-transformed maximum depth of occurrence, latitude and environment (table 1; electronic supplementary material, table S8). To determine which of the environmental categories explained variance in Q10-normalized citrate synthase activity, the categories were coded as dummy variables and added stepwise to a model including log(depth) and latitude. Only those categories that decreased AIC were retained in the final model, which modelled evolution on a tree with Nee's arbitrary branch lengths with maximum-likelihood λ = 0.35 (table 3). The relationship between latitude and citrate synthase activity was positive (table 3 and figure 1c) and that between citrate synthase activity and log(depth) was negative (table 3). Pelagic species had relatively high citrate synthase activities, whereas demersal species had relatively low citrate synthase activities (table 3); other species were intermediate. Adding salinity to the best model increased AIC (Δi = 1.9), as did adding hemisphere of origin (Δi = 1.7); adding hemisphere of origin and an interaction between hemisphere of origin and latitude decreased AIC (Δi = −0.2) and the terms themselves were not significant (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The present study supports the MCA hypothesis at multiple levels of biological organization in fishes. The SMR of fishes from high latitudes is higher than that of fishes from low latitudes (figure 1), and this relationship is matched with positive relationships between absolute latitude and mitochondrial respiration (figure 1b), and a positive relationship between latitude and the activity of a key metabolic enzyme (figure 1c). Support for MCA is strongest for SMR, because removing latitude as a predictor of SMR increased AIC by more than 4 over equivalent phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic models including latitude, indicating that models without latitude have considerably less support than those that include latitude [54]. Removing latitude from the best model for SMR increased AIC by 10, indicating that the model without latitude has essentially no support relative to the equivalent model that included latitude. Similarly, removing latitude as a predictor of citrate synthase activity increased AIC by at least 5, indicating that models without latitude have considerably less support than those including latitude [54]. Support for a relationship between latitude and mitochondrial respiration was more equivocal. Summed over all evolutionary models, the best statistical model for Q10-normalized mitochondrial respiration included latitude as a predictor (table 1), but excluding latitude from the best single (statistical + evolutionary) model (table 3) increased AIC by only 1.8, indicating that both models are well supported (the model with latitude is 2.5 times more likely to be a better model than the equivalent without latitude). In fishes, mitochondrial volume density varies with water temperature [60,61], and thermal acclimation can induce changes in the cristae surface density of mitochondria as well as mitochondrial volume density of muscle [62,63]. Thus, changes in tissue ultrastructure may be more important evolutionary responses to cold than changes in mitochondrial respiration. Data for rates of mitochondrial respiration, however, are relatively scarce for tropical fishes restricted to low latitudes (figure 1b), and data for additional species from these regions would be valuable in further investigating the relationship between latitude and mitochondrial respiration.

In addition to the relationships between latitude and SMR, mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity presented here (figure 1), MCA in fishes is also supported by the negative relationship between mitochondrial density and water temperature [60,61]. These findings are consistent with countergradient variation in metabolism, and demonstrate that the geographical patterns of these traits match the significant countergradient variation that has been observed in a range of other traits in fishes, including growth rate [64,65], coloration [66,67], body shape [68] and digestive performance [69]. However, acclimation to cold can also cause increases in SMR [26,70], mitochondrial respiration [71] and citrate synthase activity [72]. Thus, the present study is unable to distinguish between genetic and phenotypic associations between latitude and SMR, mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity because high latitude species were acclimated to, and measured at, low temperatures, and low latitude species acclimated to, and measured at, high temperatures.

The present study is unable to establish why SMR, mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity are associated with latitude, because latitude is not a cause of variation in these traits per se; latitude merely acts as a proxy for the environmental variables that do. For example, temperature is on average lower at the poles than the equator, but climate variability is also associated with latitude and has been proposed as a driver of metabolic adaptation in fishes [73], mammals [14,74] and birds [15]. The best evidence for a causal association between temperature and metabolic traits comes from studies of laboratory evolution, but such studies are rare (see Garland & Rose [75] for a review of experimental evolution). For example, lines of Drosophila melanogaster allowed to evolve in the laboratory for over 100 generations at low temperature have higher MRs than lines allowed to evolve at high temperature, suggesting that the association between MR and latitude demonstrated by common garden experiments in D. melanogaster arises as a consequence of an evolutionary increase in MR for populations adapted to low temperature ([76], see also [77] for a discussion of potential confounds between water stress and high temperature).

The present study identifies a significant negative association between citrate synthase activity and maximum depth of occurrence, and differences in citrate synthase activities between pelagic and demersal fish species (table 3). Such relationships have been identified previously for citrate synthase activity [56,7880], and are associated with differences in locomotor activity and aerobic capacity between pelagic, demersal and deep-sea species. Given the association between citrate synthase activity and environment, it is perhaps surprising that there was no association between environment and SMR, or between environment and mitochondrial respiration. However, few data that met our criteria are available for pelagic species (two species for SMR and three for mitochondrial respiration), so the lack of an effect might arise as a consequence of low statistical power.

The findings of the present study contradict a number of recent studies that reject the MCA hypothesis for fishes [22,23]. For example, Clarke & Johnston [23] concluded that evolutionary adaptation reduced the overall thermal sensitivity of resting metabolism across species, but rejected the MCA hypothesis because polar notothenioids (Perciformes) have resting MRs that are not detectably different from those predicted from the relationship between MR and temperature of non-polar perciforme fishes [23]. We argue, however, that the reduced thermal sensitivity of metabolism across species reported by Clarke & Johnston [23] and others [4], including the present study (table 3), actually represents compelling evidence in favour of MCA. When assessed across species, the reduced temperature sensitivity occurs because fishes tend to be measured at temperatures broadly representative of the temperatures at which they occur, and because fishes from cold climates have relatively high MRs, whereas those from warm climates have relatively low MRs. Thus, because of MCA, the value of Q10 calculated for interspecific data is lower than that calculated from the intraspecific relationship between temperature and MR observed for eurythermal species.

A consequence of the relatively low thermal sensitivity of metabolism across species is that metabolic compensation for the global temperature gradient is not complete. Thus, despite species from high latitudes having high MRs relative to measurement temperature and body size, when measured at their habitat temperature species from high latitudes have lower absolute rates of metabolism than species from low latitudes. This indicates that evolutionary adaptation and thermal plasticity compensate for, but are insufficient to, completely overcome the acute thermodynamic effects of temperature, at least in fishes.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for comments provided by Steven Chown, Andrew Clarke, Philip Matthews, Roger Seymour and the anonymous reviewers on earlier versions of the manuscript. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (DP0987626).

References

  • 1.Ege R., Krogh A. 1914. On the relation between the temperature and the respiratory exchange in fishes. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 7, 48–55 10.1002/iroh.19140070105 (doi:10.1002/iroh.19140070105) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krogh A. 1916. Respiratory exchange of animals and man. London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kolokotrones T., Savage V. M., Deeds E. J., Fontana W. 2010. Curvature in metabolic scaling. Nature 464, 753–756 10.1038/nature08920 (doi:10.1038/nature08920) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.White C. R., Phillips N. F., Seymour R. S. 2006. The scaling and temperature dependence of vertebrate metabolism. Biol. Lett. 2, 125–127 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0378 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0378) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glazier D. S. 2010. A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants. Biol. Rev. 85, 111–138 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00095.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00095.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.West G. B., Brown J. H., Enquist B. J. 1999. The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284, 1677–1679 10.1126/science.284.5420.1677 (doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1677) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Artacho P., Nespolo R. F. 2009. Natural selection reduces energy metabolism in the garden snail, Helix aspersa (Cornu aspersum). Evolution 63, 1044–1050 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00603.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00603.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rixon R. H., Stevenson J. A. F. 1957. Factors influencing survival of rats in fasting: metabolic rate and body weight loss. Am. J. Physiol. 188, 332–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blackmer A. L., Mauck R. A., Ackerman J. T., Huntington C. E., Nevitt G. A., Williams J. B. 2005. Exploring individual quality: basal metabolic rate and reproductive performance in storm-petrels. Behav. Ecol. 16, 906–913 10.1093/beheco/ari069 (doi:10.1093/beheco/ari069) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cruz-Neto A. P., Jones K. E. 2005. Exploring the evolution of basal rate of metabolism in bats. In Functional and evolutionary ecology of bats (eds Zubaid G. F., McCracken G. F., Kunz T. H.), pp. 56–89 New York, NY: Oxford University Press [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wiersma P., Muñoz-Garcia A., Walker A., Williams J. B. 2007. Tropical birds have a slow pace of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9340–9345 10.1073/pnas.0702212104 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0702212104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Symonds M. R. E. 1999. Life history of the Insectivora: the role of phylogeny, metabolism and sex differences. J. Zool. 249, 315–337 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00768.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00768.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Addo-Bediako A., Chown S. L., Gaston K. J. 2002. Metabolic cold adaptation in insects: a large-scale perspective. Funct. Ecol. 16, 332–338 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00634.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00634.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lovegrove B. G. 2003. The influence of climate on the basal metabolic rate of small mammals: a slow–fast metabolic continuum. J. Comp. Physiol. B 173, 87–112 10.1007/s00360-002-0309-5 (doi:10.1007/s00360-002-0309-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.White C. R., Blackburn T. M., Martin G. R., Butler P. J. 2007. Basal metabolic rate of birds is associated with habitat temperature and precipitation, not primary productivity. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 287–293 10.1098/rspb.2006.3727 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3727) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Speakman J. R., Król E. 2010. Maximal heat dissipation capacity and hyperthermia risk: neglected key factors in the ecology of endotherms. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 726–746 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01689.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01689.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wohlschlag D. E. 1960. Metabolism of an antarctic fish and the phenomenon of cold adaption. Ecology 41, 287–292 10.2307/1930217 (doi:10.2307/1930217) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holeton G. F. 1974. Metabolic cold adaptation of polar fish: fact or artefact? Physiol. Zool. 47, 137–152 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gaston K. J., et al. 2009. Macrophysiology: a conceptual reunification. Am. Nat. 174, 595–612 10.1086/605982 (doi:10.1086/605982) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Conover D. O., Schultz E. T. 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 248–252 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89081-3 (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89081-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Peck L. S., Conway L. Z. 2000. The myth of metabolic cold adaptation: oxygen consumption in stenothermal Antarctic bivalves. In The evolutionary biology of the bivalvia (eds Taylor E. M., Crame J. A.), pp. 447–450 London, UK: The Geological Society of London [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steffensen J. F. 2002. Metabolic cold adaptation of polar fish based on measurements of aerobic oxygen consumption: fact or artefact? Artefact! Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 132, 789–795 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00048-X (doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00048-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clarke A., Johnston N. M. 1999. Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 893–905 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00337.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00337.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lardies M. A., Bacigalupe L. D., Bozinovic F. 2004. Testing the metabolic cold adaptation hypothesis: an intraspecific latitudinal comparison in the common woodlouse. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 567–578 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Uliano E., Chaurasia A., Bernà L., Agnisola C., D'Onofrio G. 2010. Metabolic rate and genomic GC: what we can learn from teleost fish. Mar. Genomics 3, 29–34 10.1016/j.margen.2010.02.001 (doi:10.1016/j.margen.2010.02.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schaefer J., Walters A. 2010. Metabolic cold adaptation and developmental plasticity in metabolic rates among species in the Fundulus notatus species complex. Funct. Ecol. 24, 1087–1094 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01726.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01726.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Crockett E. L., Sidell B. D. 1990. Some pathways of energy metabolism are cold adapted in Antarctic fishes. Physiol. Zool. 63, 472–488 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.West J. L., Bailey J. R., Almeida-Val V. M. F., Val A. L., Sidell B. D., Driedzic W. R. 1999. Activity levels of enzymes of energy metabolism in heart and red muscle are higher in north-temperate-zone than in Amazonian teleosts. Can. J. Zool. 77, 690–696 10.1139/z99-016 (doi:10.1139/z99-016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Archer S. D., Johnston I. A. 1991. Density of christae and distribution of mitochondria in the slow muscle fibres of Antarctic fish. Physiol. Zool. 64, 242–258 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Johnston I. A., Calvo J., Guderley H., Fernandez D., Palmer L. 1998. Latitudinal variation in the abundance and oxidative capacities of muscle mitochondria in perciform fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rolfe D. F. S., Brand M. D. 1997. The physiological significance of mitochondrial proton leak in animal cells and tissues. Biosci. Rep. 17, 9–16 10.1023/A:1027327015957 (doi:10.1023/A:1027327015957) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hulbert A. J., Else P. L., Manolis S. C., Brand M. D. 2002. Proton leak in hepatocytes and liver mitochondria from archosaurs (crocodiles) and allometric relationships for ectotherms. J. Comp. Physiol. B 172, 387–397 10.1007/s00360-002-0264-1 (doi:10.1007/s00360-002-0264-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pörtner H. O. 2002. Physiological basis of temperature-dependent biogeography: trade-offs in muscle design and performance in polar ectotherms. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 2217–2230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rezende E. L., Diniz-Filho J. A. F. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses: comparing species to infer adaptations and physiological mechanisms. Compr. Physiol. 2, 1–36 10.1002/cphy.c100079 (doi:10.1002/cphy.c100079) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garland T., Jr, Bennett A. F., Rezende E. L. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3015–3035 10.1242/jeb.01745 (doi:10.1242/jeb.01745) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Freckleton R. P., Harvey P. H., Pagel M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726 10.1086/343873 (doi:10.1086/343873) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Losos J. B. 2011. Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am. Nat. 177, 709–727 10.1086/660020 (doi:10.1086/660020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Steffensen J. F., Johansen K., Bushnell P. G. 1984. An automated swimming respirometer. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 79, 437–440 10.1016/0300-9629(84)90541-3 (doi:10.1016/0300-9629(84)90541-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Froese R., Pauly D. 2010. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. See http://www.fishbase.org
  • 40.Hodkinson I. D. 2003. Metabolic cold adaptation in arthropods: a smaller-scale perspective. Funct. Ecol. 17, 562–567 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07431.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07431.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chown S. L., Addo-Bediako A., Gaston K. J. 2003. Physiological diversity: listening to the large-scale signal. Funct. Ecol. 17, 568–572 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07622.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07622.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.White C. R., Blackburn T. M., Terblanche J. S., Marais E., Gibernau M., Chown S. L. 2007. Evolutionary responses of discontinuous gas exchange in insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8357–8361 10.1073/pnas.0608968104 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0608968104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zar J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157 10.1098/rstb.1989.0106 (doi:10.1098/rstb.1989.0106) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martins E. P., Hansen T. F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646–667 10.1086/286013 (doi:10.1086/286013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garland T., Jr, Ives A. R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155, 346–364 10.1086/303327 (doi:10.1086/303327) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ihaka R., Gentleman R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 5, 299–314 10.2307/1390807 (doi:10.2307/1390807) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Duncan R. P., Forsythe D. M., Hone J. 2007. Testing the metabolic theory of ecology: allometric scaling exponents in mammals. Ecology 88, 324–333 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[324:TTMTOE]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[324:TTMTOE]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Halsey L. G., Butler P. J., Blackburn T. M. 2006. A phylogenetic analysis of the allometry of diving. Am. Nat. 167, 276–287 10.1086/499439 (doi:10.1086/499439) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Purvis A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 348, 405–421 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078 (doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0078) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pagel M. D. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156, 431–442 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80637-X (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80637-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 10.1038/44766 (doi:10.1038/44766) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R. 2001. Kullback–Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildl. Res. 28, 111–119 10.1071/WR99107 (doi:10.1071/WR99107) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sullivan K. M., Somero G. N. 1980. Enzyme activities of fish skeletal muscle and brain as influenced by depth of occurrence and habits of feeding and locomotion. Mar. Biol. 60, 91–99 10.1007/BF00389152 (doi:10.1007/BF00389152) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.White C. R., Seymour R. S. 2011. Physiological functions that scale to body mass in fish. In Encyclopedia of fish physiology: from genome to environment, vol. 3 (ed. Farrell A. P.), pp. 1573–1582 San Diego, CA: Academic Press [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Smith D. G., Duiker W., Cooke I. R. C. 1983. Sustained branchial apnea in the Australian short-finned eel, Anguilla australis. J. Exp. Zool. 226, 37–43 10.1002/jez.1402260106 (doi:10.1002/jez.1402260106) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Forster M. E., Starling L. 1982. Ventilation and oxygen consumption in the spotted stargazer Genyagnus monopterygius. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 16, 135–140 10.1080/00288330.1982.9515956 (doi:10.1080/00288330.1982.9515956) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Johnston I. A. 1987. Respiratory characteristics of muscle fibres in a fish (Chaenocephalus aceratus) that lacks haem pigments. J. Exp. Biol. 133, 415–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Guderley H. 2004. Metabolic responses to low temperature in fish muscle. Biol. Rev. 79, 409–427 10.1017/S1464793103006328 (doi:10.1017/S1464793103006328) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.St-Pierre J., Charest P.-M., Guderley H. 1998. Relative contribution of quantitative and qualitative changes in mitochondria to metabolic compensation during seasonal acclimatization in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2961–2970 [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tyler S., Sidell B. D. 1984. Changes in mitochondrial distribution and diffusion distances in muscle of goldfish upon acclimation to warm and cold temperatures. J. Exp. Zool. 232, 1–9 10.1002/jez.1402320102 (doi:10.1002/jez.1402320102) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Conover D. O., Present T. M. C. 1990. Countergradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes. Oecologia 83, 316–324 10.1007/BF00317554 (doi:10.1007/BF00317554) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Arendt J. D., Wilson D. S. 1999. Countergradient selection for rapid growth in pumpkinseed sunfish: disentangling ecological and evolutionary effects. Ecology 80, 2793–2798 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2793:CSFRGI]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2793:CSFRGI]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Craig J. K., Foote C. J. 2001. Countergradient variation and secondary sexual color: phenotypic convergence promotes genetic divergence in carotenoid use between sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Evolution 55, 380–391 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01301.x (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01301.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Grenther G. F., Cummings M. E., Hudon J. 2005. Countergradient variation in the sexual coloration of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): drosopterin synthesis balances carotenoid availability. Evolution 59, 175–188 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Marcil J., Swain D. P., Hutchings J. A. 2006. Countergradient variation in body shape between two populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 217–223 10.1098/rspb.2005.3306 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3306) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nicieza A. G., Reiriz L., Braña F. 1994. Variation in digestive performance between geographically disjunct populations of Atlantic salmon: countergradient in passage time and digestion rate. Oecologia 99, 243–251 10.1007/BF00627736 (doi:10.1007/BF00627736) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fry F. E. J., Hart J. S. 1948. The relation of temperature to oxygen consumption in the goldfish. Biol. Bull. 94, 66–77 10.2307/1538211 (doi:10.2307/1538211) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Guderley H., Johnston I. A. 1996. Plasticity of fish muscle mitochondria with thermal acclimation. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 1311–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Johnston I. A., Sidell B. D., Driedzic W. R. 1985. Force-velocity characteristics and metabolism of carp muscle fibres following temperature acclimation. J. Exp. Biol. 119, 239–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pörtner H. O. 2004. Climate variability and the energetic pathways of evolution: the origin of endothermy in mammals and birds. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77, 959–981 10.1086/423742 (doi:10.1086/423742) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Withers P. C., Cooper C. E., Larcombe A. N. 2006. Environmental correlates of physiological variables in marsupials. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79, 437–453 10.1086/501063 (doi:10.1086/501063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Garland T., Jr, Rose M. R. (eds) 2009. Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications of selection experiments. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Berrigan D., Patridge L. 1997. Influence of temperature and activity on the metabolic rate of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 118, 1301–1307 10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3 (doi:10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Terblanche J. S., Clusella-Trullas S., Chown S. L. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity of gas exchange pattern and water loss in Scarabaeus spretus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): deconstructing the basis for metabolic rate variation. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2940–2949 10.1242/jeb.041889 (doi:10.1242/jeb.041889) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Torres J. J., Somero G. N. 1988. Metabolism, enzymic activities and cold adaptation in Antarctic mesopelagic fishes. Mar. Biol. 98, 169–180 10.1007/BF00391192 (doi:10.1007/BF00391192) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dickson K. A., Gregorio M. O., Gruber S. J., Loefler K. L., Tran M., Terrell C. 1993. Biochemical indexes of aerobic and anaerobic capacity in muscle tissues of California elasmobranch fishes differing in typical activity level. Mar. Biol. 117, 185–193 10.1007/BF00345662 (doi:10.1007/BF00345662) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Somero G. N., Childress J. J. 1990. Scaling of ATP-supplying enzymes, myofibrillar proteins and buffering capacity in fish muscle: relationship to locomotory habit. J. Exp. Biol. 149, 319–333 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES