Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2011 Oct 19;45(3):307–315. doi: 10.1002/eat.20965

Comorbidity of Partial and Subthreshold PTSD among Men and Women with Eating Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication Study

Karen S Mitchell 1,2, Suzanne E Mazzeo 3,4, Michelle R Schlesinger 5, Timothy D Brewerton 6, Brian N Smith 1,2
PMCID: PMC3297686  NIHMSID: NIHMS335023  PMID: 22009722

Abstract

Objective

The comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and eating disorders (EDs) is high among women but has been understudied in men. Little is known about the association between partial or subthreshold PTSD and EDs among women or men.

Method

This study included PTSD and ED data from male (n=2382) and female (n=3310) National Comorbidity Survey-Replication study participants.

Results

The vast majority of women and men with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED) reported a history of interpersonal trauma. Rates of PTSD were significantly higher among women and men with BN and BED. Subthreshold PTSD was more prevalent than threshold PTSD among women with BN and women and men with BED.

Discussion

Interpersonal forms of trauma, PTSD, and subthreshold/partial PTSD, were prevalent among men and women with EDs. Findings highlight the importance of assessing for trauma and PTSD in ED patients.


Trauma exposure is considered a non-specific risk factor for eating disorders (1). In particular, the association between childhood sexual abuse and disordered eating has been studied fairly extensively among women (2). More recent investigations have included other forms of childhood abuse (3-5) as well as adult victimization among women (3, 4) and men (5); however, most studies to date have not included an extensive range of trauma types.

The exact mechanisms through which trauma contributes to the etiology of eating disorders are not entirely clear. Exposure to traumatic stress may contribute to general psychobiological dysregulation (6), which could increase susceptibility to a variety of psychiatric disorders. Further, sexual trauma may directly impact one’s body image (7); however, this association might be fully or partly mediated by the development of a self-critical view following trauma exposure (8). In the case of eating disorders, this self-criticism may be focused on one’s physical appearance, leading to the use of extreme methods to achieve the thin-ideal. Moreover, some victims of sexual trauma may wish to be thinner, to minimize secondary sex characteristics and appear less attractive to potential perpetrators.

It has been suggested that the development of PTSD may fully or partially mediate the relation between trauma and disordered eating (2). Among participants in the population-based National Women’s Study, 36.9% of participants with bulimia nervosa (BN), 21% with binge eating disorder (BED), and 11.8% of non-BN/non-BED women met criteria for lifetime PTSD (9). Despite these high rates, the comorbidity of EDs and PTSD remains understudied, possibly because these disorders have very different clinical presentations.

Although they do not share core criteria, many of the associated features of PTSD and EDs overlap (10). High rates of dissociation, as well as alexithymia, have been described among individuals with EDs as well as PTSD (3, 11-14). Bingeing or purging might serve as a means of dissociation to “escape from” PTSD symptoms (4, 15-17). Further, it has been suggested that emotion dysregulation is a key developmental factor in both disorders (18-21), and subsets of individuals with both EDs and PTSD are characterized by impulsivity (22-28). These shared features may explain why anorexia nervosa (AN) binge/purge type, BN, and BED are more frequently comorbid with PTSD compared with AN- restricting type (2, 15, 17, 29-31). However, it is difficult to determine whether the impulsivity associated with these self-harming behaviors was evident prior to the trauma experience or whether it was triggered by the trauma exposure (9, 32).

EDs and PTSD also may share common genetic and biological vulnerabilities. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction has been described in both disorders (33, 34). In addition, genetic variation in the serotonin, dopamine, glucocorticoid, and neuropeptide Y (NPY) systems may predispose some individuals to both PTSD (35-39) and disordered eating (40-44). Thus, PTSD and EDs may be comorbid because of shared biological, genetic, and psychosocial vulnerabilities.

To date, studies of EDs and PTSD have predominantly included female samples, as most EDs are far more prevalent among women than men (45). However, rates of binge eating and BED appear more similar across genders (46, 47). Given the strong association between PTSD and binge eating and/or purging (9, 15, 48), males with PTSD might be particularly susceptible to the development of comorbid ED symptoms. Across genders, similar associations between PTSD and EDs have been reported in the few studies that have included men. Lipschitz and colleagues (49) found that hospitalized adolescent males with PTSD were more likely to have comorbid EDs than were males without PTSD diagnoses. To date, there are no published data regarding rates of PTSD among males with EDs, underscoring the need for further research among men.

The diagnostic criteria for PTSD are among the most hotly debated in the psychiatric nosology (50). This disorder’s criteria have been substantially revised since its introduction in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-III (DSM-III). Major revisions also are proposed for DSM-5. Given the controversy regarding the PTSD diagnosis, examination of partial and subthreshold forms of PTSD (51) could yield useful information about PTSD-ED comorbidity. Brewerton (2) reported unpublished, preliminary analyses regarding subthreshold/partial PTSD and disordered eating from the National Women’s Study. A total of 37% of women with BN met criteria for lifetime PTSD; an additional 15% met criteria for one cluster of lifetime PTSD symptoms, and an additional 13% met criteria for two clusters. To date, only one investigation of subthreshold PTSD among women with EDs has been published. Inniss and colleagues (52) examined these comorbid conditions among a sample of Canadian patients with BN (n=78) and non-ED controls (n=61). They defined subthreshold PTSD as meeting DSM-IV Criterion A (traumatic event), and criteria for two of the three symptom clusters, with duration of symptoms for at least one month and endorsement of at least one symptom for each cluster. Among women with BN, the rate of threshold PTSD was 17.9%, while subthreshold PTSD was evident in 41.0%. These rates were 6.6% and 14.8% among non-ED controls. Women with BN and PTSD had higher rates of sexual and physical victimization than women with BN but no PTSD and non-ED women without PTSD.

Currently, there are no published studies of partial/subthreshold PTSD among individuals with EDs in a population-based sample. Thus, the current study had two primary aims: to evaluate rates of PTSD among men with EDs and to evaluate rates of subthreshold and partial PTSD among women and men with EDs. A secondary aim was to examine rates of specific types of trauma among men and women by ED status.

Method

Participants

Participants were 2392 men and 3310 women from Part II of the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R). Part I of the NCS-R study included a total of 9282 participants; the 5692 individuals who participated in Part II included those who reported a lifetime history of any Part I disorder plus an additional probability sample of other respondents. PTSD was assessed in Part II of the survey. EDs were assessed among a probability subsample (n=1220 men and 1760 women) from Part II.

Measures

The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was used to assess DSM-IV and ICD-10 disorders (53). This structured interview was administered face-to-face, using laptop computer assisted personal interview. Each item is scored yes/no. Because of the length of time required to complete this interview, skip-outs were used for each diagnosis.

Traumatic events

Participants were asked whether they had ever been exposed to a variety of traumatic events, including combat, a life-threatening accident, a major natural disaster, or physical or sexual assault. A complete list of trauma forms assessed is available at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/CPES/diagnostics/DSM-IV_Posttraumatic_Stress_Disorder.pdf. Individuals who endorsed exposure to a given traumatic event were asked their age at the time of the event and the frequency or duration of the event, as appropriate.

PTSD

The algorithms used to diagnose DSM-IV PTSD are available at http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/diagnosis.php. Participants who had never experienced a traumatic event (Criterion A) skipped to the next section of the interview. PTSD symptoms were assessed for the participant-identified worst trauma as well as an event chosen at random by the interviewer (for those participants who reported experiencing more than one trauma). Criterion C (avoidance/numbing) was assessed first. Participants who reported no avoidance symptoms skipped the remainder of the PTSD interview. Similarly, participants who reported no Criterion B (re-experiencing) symptoms skipped to the next section, as did those who reported no Criterion D (hyperarousal) symptoms. At least two Criterion B symptoms, three Criterion C symptoms, and one Criterion D symptom must have been present for at least one month (Criterion E) and cause significant distress (Criterion F) to yield a DSM-IV PTSD diagnosis.

For the current study, these algorithms were modified to diagnose several forms of partial and subthreshold PTSD. Subthreshold PTSD diagnoses, in which at least some symptoms are present for all clusters, included AB(C)DEF, in which at least one symptom is endorsed for cluster C (but the DSM-IV criterion of at least three symptoms is not met), and ABC(D)EF, in which at least one symptom is endorsed for cluster D (but the DSM-IV criterion of at least two symptoms is not met). Partial PTSD, in which symptoms from one cluster may be absent, included ABCEF, ABDEF, and ACDEF. Finally, ages at the worst and randomly chosen events were recorded.

Eating Disorders

ED algorithms used in the current study were described previously by Hudson et al. (46). The version of the CIDI used in the NCS-R assesses DSM-IV and ICD-10 AN and BN. BED, currently included in the appendix of the DSM-IV as a set of criteria for further study, also was assessed. However, although the DSM requires at least six months of binge eating in order to qualify for a diagnosis of BED, the CIDI asked only whether symptoms were present for three months.

Participants who did not report both a time in their lives when they had a great deal of concern about, or strongly feared, being too fat or overweight and, that they had had this strong worry or fear at a time when they really weighed less than most other people, skipped to the BN section. Similarly, participants who did not report ever having eating binges at least twice per week for several months or longer skipped subsequent questions assessing BN and BED criteria. Inappropriate weight loss strategies, including fasting, taking diuretics or weight control medicines, self-induced vomiting, taking laxatives or enemas, and excessive exercise, were assessed in the BN section.

Procedure

The NCS-R design has been described previously (54). Briefly, participants were interviewed between February 2001 and December 2003 (55). The researchers used a multistage clustered area probability design. The response rate for the NCS-R was 70.9%. The Human Subjects Committees of Harvard Medical School and the University of Michigan approved the original study. The Institutional Review Board of VA Boston Healthcare System approved the analyses conducted in the current investigation.

Statistical Analyses

Sample weights (54) were used to adjust for non-response and bias in selection of Part II participants. PROC TTEST and PROC MEANS were used to compute descriptive statistics. The PROC SURVEYFREQ method in SAS (version 9.2), which uses Taylor series linearization to compare a ratio of the estimator of cell total frequency to the estimator of the overall population, was employed to compute rates of diagnoses and Rao-Scott chi-square tests comparing PTSD diagnoses and trauma types across ED status. Because of the large number of statistical tests, only those reaching p<.01 were considered significant.

Results

Descriptives

Demographics are reported for men and women in the total sample and by eating disorder status in Supplementary Tables 1-2. The mean age for men in the Part II sample was 43.21 (SD=16.11; Range=18-93); the mean age for women was 44.01 (SD=16.65; Range=18-99). The majority of men (73.65%) and women (71.96%) were White, as this sample reflects the race distribution in the U.S. population at the time of the survey. In terms of education, 15.70% of women and 17.95% of men had completed 0-11 years of school, 33.52% of women and 31.30% of men had completed 12 years, 28.39% of women and 26.59% of men had completed 13-15 years, and 22.38% of women and 24.06% of men had completed ≥ 16 years. The average household income was $52,614.49 (SD=44,000.28) for women and $66804.46 (SD=53,654.48) for men.

Race did not differ among women and men with BN, BED, or AN (all p’s > .01). Education level and mean household income did not differ among women with BN, BED, or AN, or among men with BED or AN (all p’s > .01); however, men with BN had achieved a higher level of education on average (p <0.001), and reported a higher mean household income (p <0.01), than men without BN.

A total of 4984 participants, including 2845 women (79.44% [weighted]) and 2109 men (84.05% [weighted]) reported ever having experienced a form of trauma. Only 191 (8.00%) women and 46 men (2.40%) endorsed both AN skip-out items; 133 (4.96%) women and 63 (4.22%) men reported ever bingeing at least twice per week for several months or longer.

The prevalence of PTSD was 9.71% among women and 3.59% among men. Not surprisingly, rates of partial and subthreshold PTSD were higher than those of PTSD among both men and women. This difference was particularly salient for subthreshold form AB(C)DEF (11.52% and 4.88%) and partial form ABDEF (11.58% and 4.93%). Estimates are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Prevalence and concordance of eating disorders and PTSD diagnoses in women and men.

Women Men
ED (%)* PTSD diagnosis % % within ED % within PTSD χ2 (df) P-value ED (%)* PTSD % % within ED % within PTSD χ2 (df) P-value
BN (1.5) PTSD 9.71 39.81 3.21 38.89 (1) <0.001 BN (0.5) 3.59 66.19 4.36 61.11 (1) <0.001
PTSD Sub C 11.52 47.29 3.22 47.52 (1) <0.001 4.88 66.19 3.20 42.99 (1) <0.001
PTSD Sub D 10.00 39.81 3.12 37.18 (1) <0.001 3.82 66.19 4.09 56.96 (1) <0.001
PTSD BCEF 10.02 39.81 3.11 37.09 (1) <0.001 3.84 66.19 4.07 56.63 (1) <0.001
PTSD BDEF 11.58 47.29 3.20 47.12 (1) <0.001 4.93 66.19 3.17 42.48 (1) <0.001
PTSD CDEF 9.79 39.81 3.18 38.41 (1) <0.001 3.63 66.19 4.31 60.39 (1) <0.001
BED (3.5) PTSD 25.74 4.40 17.58 (1) <0.001 BED (2.0) 24.02 6.66 19.87 (1) <0.001
PTSD Sub C 27.64 3.98 15.49 (1) <0.001 25.68 5.23 15.88 (1) <0.001
PTSD Sub D 25.74 4.27 16.51 (1) <0.001 24.02 6.26 18.26 (1) <0.001
PTSD BCEF 25.74 4.26 16.46 (1) <0.001 24.02 6.22 18.14 (1) <0.001
PTSD BDEF 27.64 3.96 15.28 (1) <0.001 25.68 5.18 15.65 (1) <0.001
PTSD CDEF 25.74 4.36 17.28 (1) <0.001 24.02 6.59 19.59 (1) <0.001
AN (0.9) PTSD 16.09 0.71 0.87 (1) <0.36 AN (0.3) 0 0 -- --
PTSD Sub C 18.96 0.70 1.01 (1) <0.32 0 0 -- --
PTSD Sub D 16.09 0.68 0.77 (1) <0.39 35.99 0.88 8.17 (1) <0.005
PTSD BCEF 16.09 0.68 0.76 (1) <0.39 35.99 0.87 8.11 (1) <0.005
PTSD BDEF 18.96 0.70 0.99 (1) <0.33 0 0 -- --
PTSD CDEF 16.09 0.70 0.84 (1) <0.36 0 0 -- --

Note: See Supplementary Table 3 for additional results. ED=eating disorder; BN=bulimia nervosa; BED=binge eating disorder; AN=anorexia nervosa; PTSD=posttraumatic stress disorder; PTSD Sub C=subthreshold form of PTSD in which at least one symptom is endorsed for cluster C; PTSD Sub D=subthreshold form of PTSD in which at least one symptom is endorsed for cluster D; PTSD BCEF=partial form of PTSD in which Cluster D symptoms may be absent; PTSD BDEF=partial form of PTSD in which Cluster C symptoms may be absent; PTSD CDEF=partial form of PTSD in which Cluster B symptoms may be absent; χ2=chi-square; df=degrees of freedom.

*

Prevalences originally reported by Hudson et al. (46)

Chi-square and p-values are not available for analyses with empty cells.

Types of trauma

Rates of trauma types were compared across women and men by ED status (see Table 2 for chi-square analysis results). Women with lifetime BN (n=45) reported high rates of any type of trauma (100%), as well as any type of interpersonal trauma (78.21%). Relative to women without BN, they were specifically more likely to report exposure to life-threatening automobile accidents, beating by parents/guardians, beating by romantic partners, beating by other individuals, rape, sexual assault other than rape, stalking, vicarious trauma, serious physical fights in the home during childhood, witnessing someone else be injured/killed, or to have purposefully injured/tortured/killed someone else (all p’s<0.01). Similarly, 90.33% of women with lifetime BED (n=75) reported any type of trauma and 63.67% endorsed any type of interpersonal trauma. Relative to women without BED, they were significantly more like to report exposure including life-threatening automobile accidents, beating by parents/guardians, beating by romantic partners, beating by other individuals, sexual assault other than rape, stalking, and serious physical fights in the home during childhood (all p’s<0.01). Although 100% of women with AN (n=18) reported experiencing any form of trauma, and 71.16% reported exposure to interpersonal trauma, none of the chi-squares reached significance at p<0.01, likely due to low power.

Table 2.

Types of trauma by eating disorder status in women and men.

Trauma % women % women non-ED % women with BN Χ2 Df p-value %women with BED Χ2 Df p-value %women with AN Χ2 Df p-value
Combat 0.14 0.14 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- --
Peacekeeper 0.19 0.19 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- --
Civilian 2.00 2.01 4.43 1.83 1 <0.18 0.82 0.84 1 <0.36 2.87 0.12 1 <0.73
Terror 2.23 2.14 3.86 0.65 1 <0.42 7.32 7.59 1 <0.01 0 -- -- --
Refugee 0.85 0.84 1.43 0.257 1 <0.61 1.65 0.83 1 <0.37 0 -- -- --
Kidnapped 1.90 1.80 5.27 3.30 1 <0.07 3.48 1.09 1 <0.30 13.01 5.61 1 <0.02
Toxin 2.96 2.92 1.43 0.54 1 <0.47 6.49 2.91 1 <0.09 0 -- -- --
Auto 15.34 14.96 35.11* 10.92 1 <0.002 30.56* 8.29 1 <0.01 12.19 0.11 1 <0.74
Other accident 5.52 5.45 8.62 0.46 1 <0.50 10.21 2.07 1 <0.16 2.90 0.40 1 <0.53
Natural disaster 14.92 14.72 27.58 4.45 1 <0.04 26.14 4.13 1 <0.05 15.21 0.00 1 <.096
Man-made disaster 5.52 5.38 6.92 0.28 1 <0.60 11.57 3.74 1 <0.06 17.16 4.67 1 <0.04
Illness 15.07 15.01 12.70 0.14 1 <0.72 24.51 3.88 1 <0.05 6.02 1.01 1 <0.32
Parents beat 6.84 6.60 21.40* 13.27 1 <0.001 18.59* 13.71 1 <0.001 8.98 0.25 1 <0.62
Partner beat 13.29 12.94 33.20* 12.29 1 <0.001 24.86* 7.48 1 <0.007 21.82 0.76 1 <0.39
Other beat 2.45 2.26 9.71* 7.59 1 <0.01 7.16* 8.06 1 <0.005 13.01 4.11 1 <0.05
Mugged 11.99 11.83 19.45 2.49 1 <0.12 16.75 1.28 1 <0.26 24.97 1.83 1 <0.18
Raped 14.65 14.45 40.94* 20.41 1 <0.001 19.51 1.48 1 <0.23 32.76 3.25 1 <0.08
Other sexual assault 18.65 18.24 39.28* 10.97 1 <0.001 34.78* 8.42 1 <0.004 48.11 6.09 1 <0.02
Stalked 13.41 12.89 35.71* 17.87 1 <0.001 33.88* 22.00 1 <0.001 28.31 2.51 1 <0.12
Unexpected death 42.82 42.66 55.58 2.52 1 <0.12 55.00 3.33 1 <0.07 35.42 0.30 1 <0.59
Child 13.94 13.84 15.98 0.11 1 <0.74 18.52 0.96 1 <0.33 27.18 0.96 1 <0.33
Vicarious 9.73 9.43 37.45* 32.46 1 <0.001 18.26 5.20 1 <0.03 12.28 0.24 1 <0.63
Witnessed fights 15.61 15.20 45.80* 25.60 1 <0.001 30.83* 8.35 1 <0.004 29.05 1.75 1 <0.19
Witnessed injury 19.06 18.91 37.05* 8.04 1 <0.005 27.45 2.03 1 <0.16 5.77 3.40 1 <0.07
Accidentally harm 0.71 0.70 0 -- -- -- 1.90 2.02 1 <0.16 0 -- -- --
Purposefully harm 0.36 0.30 4.73* 13.14 1 <0.001 1.89 4.12 1 <0.05 0 -- -- --
Atrocities 1.64 1.64 3.93 2.20 1 <0.14 0.82 0.49 1 <0.48 0 -- -- --
Any trauma 79.44 79.05 100 -- -- -- 90.33 -- -- -- 100 -- -- --
Any IPT 46.22 45.61 78.21 -- -- -- 63.67 -- -- -- 71.16 -- -- --
Men
Trauma % men % men non-ED % men with BN Χ2 Df p-value % men with BED Χ2 Df p-value %men with AN Χ2 Df p-value
Combat 10.20 10.17 56.55* 9.43 1 <0.003 17.88 0.82 1 <0.37 0 -- -- --
Peacekeeper 2.80 2.80 6.64 0.64 1 <0.43 3.85 0.18 1 <0.67 0 -- -- --
Civilian 2.28 2.31 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- --
Terror 2.56 2.51 22.41* 9.42 1 <0.003 2.29 0.01 1 <0.93 31.84* 10.59 1 <0.002
Refugee 0.81 0.83 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- --
Kidnapped 0.84 0.83 9.64 7.64 1 <0.006 2.29 1.04 1 <0.31 0 -- -- --
Toxin 11.65 11.50 74.60* 23.65 1 <0.001 35.36* 9.47 1 <0.003 0 -- -- --
Auto 23.43 23.22 66.19 5.26 1 <0.03 50.00* 7.78 1 <0.006 0 -- -- --
Other accident 14.28 14.32 17.51 0.06 1 <0.81 13.76 0.01 1 <0.95 0 -- -- --
Natural disaster 20.15 19.93 57.79 3.73 1 <0.06 43.02 5.77 1 <0.02 67.83 4.36 1 <0.04
Man-made disaster 8.00 7.83 0 -- -- -- 28.37* 10.02 1 <0.002 0 -- -- --
Illness 17.02 16.90 59.55 5.64 1 <0.02 34.60 3.79 1 <0.06 31.84 0.49 1 <0.49
Parents beat 6.27 5.99 16.27 1.48 1 <0.23 34.35* 26.69 1 <0.001 32.17 3.68 1 <0.06
Partner beat 1.53 1.38 59.55* 107.03 1 <0.001 14.14* 12.06 1 <0.001 35.99* 24.49 1 <0.001
Other 12.37 12.30 16.27 0.12 1 <0.74 22.64 2.15 1 <0.15 32.17 1.11 1 <0.30
Mugged 25.81 25.46 80.59* 10.51 1 <0.002 64.45* 18.53 1 <0.001 32.17 0.07 1 <0.79
Raped 2.27 2.15 18.04* 8.51 1 <0.004 12.94* 16.26 1 <0.001 0 -- -- --
Other sexual assault 4.90 4.74 23.53 4.24 1 <0.04 16.12 5.59 1 <0.02 68.16* 26.92 1 <0.001
Stalked 5.11 4.93 59.55* 27.46 1 <0.001 22.75* 9.68 1 <0.002 35.99 5.90 1 <0.02
Unexpected death 40.70 40.52 86.83* 8.48 1 <0.004 76.03* 13.25 1 <0.001 67.83 0.94 1 <0.34
Child 8.65 8.69 14.39 0.35 1 <0.56 4.56 0.88 1 <0.35 32.17 2.10 1 <0.15
Vicarious 9.49 9.24 59.55* 13.16 1 <0.001 38.79* 18.87 1 <0.001 0 -- -- --
Witnessed fights 12.87 12.66 92.13* 58.43 1 <0.001 35.32 7.62 1 <0.006 0 -- -- --
Witnessed injury 38.42 38.27 93.36* 15.52 1 <0.001 67.85* 9.15 1 <0.003 32.17 0.05 1 <0.83
Accidentally harm 2.22 2.11 64.31* 92.28 1 <0.001 14.14* 7.25 1 <0.008 0 -- -- --
Purposefully harm 3.68 3.43 64.31* 53.47 1 <0.001 29.40* 29.01 1 <0.001 0 -- -- --
Atrocities 9.90 9.95 14.39 0.19 1 <0.67 8.62 0.06 1 <0.82 0 -- -- --
Any trauma 84.05 83.88 100 -- -- -- 98.40 -- -- -- 100 -- -- --
Any IPT 42.11 41.71 100 -- -- -- 74.34 -- -- -- 68.16 -- -- --

Note: PTSD=posttraumatic stress disorder; BN=bulimia nervosa; BED=binge eating disorder; AN=anorexia nervosa; χ2=chi-square; df=degrees of freedom; combat=been in combat, peacekeeper=served as a peacekeeper or relief worker in a place such as a war zone, civilian=been an unarmed civilian in a place of war/revolution, terror=been a civilian in a place where there was ongoing terror of civilians, refugee=been a refugee, kidnapped=been kidnapped or held captive, toxic=been exposed to a toxic chemical or substance, auto=been involved in a life-threatening automobile accident, other accident=been involved in any other life-threatening accident, natural disaster=been involved in a major natural disaster, man-made disaster=been involved in a man-made disaster, illness=had a life-threatening illness, parents=beaten by parents/guardians as a child, partner=beaten by a spouse or romantic partner, other=beaten by anyone else, mugged=mugged or threatened with a weapon, raped=been raped, other sexual assault=experienced sexual assault other than rape, stalked=been stalked, unexpected death=had someone close die unexpectedly, child=had a child with a life-threatening illness/injury, vicarious= had anyone close experience extreme trauma, witnessed fights=witnessed serious physical fights at home as a child, witnessed injury=witnessed someone experience bodily injury or death or unexpectedly see a dead body, accidentally harm=did something accidentally that led to injury/death of someone else, purposefully harm=purposefully injured/tortured/killed someone else, atrocities=see atrocities or carnage. Interpersonal traumas=been kidnapped or held captive, beaten by parents/guardians as a child, beaten by a spouse or romantic partner, beaten by anyone else, mugged or threatened with a weapon, been raped, experienced sexual assault other than rape, been stalked, or witnessed serious physical fights at home as a child; IPT=interpersonal trauma. Chi-square and p-values are not reported for analyses with empty cells.

*

denotes significance at p<.01.

Rates of AN, BN, and BED were compared between women with trauma exposure but no PTSD and trauma + PTSD (see Supplementary Tables 4-6). Rates of EDs were generally higher in the trauma + PTSD group. Particularly noteworthy were the high rates of BN among women who had PTSD and reported being civilians in a place of revolution/war (16.92%), being civilians in a place of ongoing terror (6.72%), severe automobile accidents (5.81%), beating by parents (5.19%), rape (4.23%), and witnessing serious physical fights in the home (6.33%). Similarly, high rates of BED were found among women who had PTSD and reported being civilians in a place of ongoing terror (16.42%), beating by parents (9.26%), beating by other individuals (10.31%), and stalking (7.43%). Rates of AN among women with trauma + PTSD were not significantly higher than those among women with only trauma exposure.

Men with a lifetime history of BN (n=7) reported high rates of any type of trauma (100%), as well as any form of interpersonal trauma (100%). Relative to men without BN, they were significantly more likely to report exposure to combat, terror of civilians, toxins, beating by romantic partners, mugging, rape, stalking, unexpected death of someone close, vicarious trauma, serious physical fights in the home during childhood, witnessing someone else be injured/killed, or to have accidentally or purposefully injured/tortured/killed someone else (all p’s<0.01; see Table 2). Similarly, 98.40% of men with lifetime BED (n=30) reported any type of trauma, and 74.34% endorsed any form of interpersonal trauma. Relative to men without BED, they were significantly more likely to report exposure to toxins, severe automobile accidents, man-made disasters, beating by parents, beating by romantic partners, mugging, rape, stalking, unexpected death of someone close, vicarious trauma, witnessing someone else be injured/killed, or to have accidentally or purposefully injured/tortured/killed someone else (all p’s<0.01). Of the men with lifetime histories of AN (n=3), 100% reported exposure to any trauma, and 68.16% reported any interpersonal trauma. Relative to individuals without AN, they were significantly more likely to report exposure to terror of civilians, beating by romantic partners, and sexual assault other than rape (all p’s<0.01).

Rates of AN, BN, and BED were compared among men with trauma exposure, with and without PTSD. Rates of BN and BED were higher for nearly all traumas among the trauma + PTSD group, compared to the trauma only group (see Supplementary Tables 4-6). Of particular note are the high rates of BN and BED among men who reported beating by partners (54.52% each), stalking (24.88% and 30.36%), accidentally harming someone (25.08% each), and purposefully harming someone (19.31% and 21.83%). Rates of AN among men with trauma + PTSD were not significantly higher than those among men with only trauma exposure.

Comorbidity

Chi-square tests were used to compare rates of all forms of PTSD among men and women with and without EDs (see Table 1 and Supplementary Table 3). Of the 18 women with AN, four (16.09%; p<0.36) had lifetime PTSD. Less than one percent (0.71%) of individuals with any form of PTSD had AN (p’s<0.32-0.39). Thus, although women with AN had higher rates of PTSD than women without AN, these differences were non-significant.

A total of 18 women with BN (39.81%; p<0.001) and 20 women with BED (25.74%; p<0.001) had a lifetime history of PTSD. An additional 7.48% (47.29% total) of women with BN met criteria for AB(C)DEF and ABDEF (p’s<0.001); an additional 1.9% (27.64% total) of women with BED met criteria for AB(C)DEF and ABDEF (p’s<0.001). A total of 3.21% and 4.40% of women with PTSD had BN and BED, respectively. Rates of BN among women with partial or subthreshold PTSD were 3.11-3.22%; rates of BED ranged from 3.96 to 4.36. Thus women with BN and with BED were significantly more likely to meet criteria for PTSD than were women without BN or BED, and rates of AB(C)DEF and ABDEF were higher than the rates of DSM-IV PTSD among these women.

Only three men had a lifetime history of AN; none reported lifetime PTSD, AB(C)DEF, ABDEF, or ACDEF. One man with AN met criteria for ABC(D)EF and ABCEF (p’s<0.01). A total of three men with BN (66.19%), and seven men with BED (24.02%) met criteria for full PTSD (p’s<0.001). Men with BN had comparable rates of all full, subthreshold, and partial forms of PTSD (66.19%; all p’s<0.001). An additional 1.66% (25.68% total) of men with BED met criteria for AB(C)DEF and ABDEF compared to full PTSD (p’s<0.001). A total of 4.23% and 6.66% of men with PTSD met criteria for lifetime BN and BED, respectively. Rates of BN among men with partial and subthreshold PTSD ranged from 3.05% to 4.09%. Rates of BED among men with partial and subthresold PTSD ranged from 5.18% to 6.59%. Thus, men with BN and BED were significantly more likely to report PTSD than were men without BN or BED. Rates of subthreshold and partial PTSD among men with BN did not differ, relative to rates of DSM-IV PTSD; however, men with BED had higher rates of AB(C)DEF and ABDEF than DSM-IV PTSD. In sum, PTSD seems to confer additional risk for disordered eating, above and beyond that due to trauma exposure alone, and this pattern appears particularly strong for men.

Discussion

Previous research has suggested a link between trauma experiences and PTSD and ED symptoms, especially binge eating and purging (2, 9, 17, 29). Although PTSD and trauma are relatively common among men (56), the majority of extant research has almost exclusively relied on female samples. In addition, given the debate about PTSD diagnostic criteria (50), it is important to examine both the rates of various subthreshold forms of this diagnosis, as well as their associations with EDs. The current study investigated these issues in a population-based sample of men and women.

Results demonstrated that rates of nearly all traumas assessed were higher among women and men with BN and BED, compared with the general population. This finding was particularly striking with respect to interpersonal traumas. For example, approximately 40% of women with BN reported a history of rape or sexual assault other than rape; these rates were nearly 20% and 35%, respectively, among women with BED. Nearly 60% of men with BN reported having been beaten by a romantic partner or stalked. The vast majority of men with BN reported exposure to violence, including mugging, witnessing serious fights in the home, or witnessing the injury of another individual or seeing a dead body. Approximately 26% of men with BED reported having been beaten by their parents. Thus, both men and women with EDs, particularly BN, have high rates of trauma perpetrated by others. These rates are especially high among individuals with EDs as well as PTSD.

Findings also highlighted the high rates of PTSD among women and men with BN and BED. However, it should also be noted that the majority of women with AN, BN, and BED, and the majority of men with AN and BED, did not have comorbid PTSD. This finding again emphasizes the multi-faceted etiology of EDs, and suggests that, although trauma history should be assessed with patients at intake, these exposures might not have a direct causal link to current manifestations of eating pathology. As with many complex disorders, the etiology of PTSD and EDs does not suggest a “one size fits all” conceptualization; rather, the onset and maintenance, and patterns of comorbidity, likely result from interplay of psychosocial, biological and genetic factors. Future studies could use a qualitative approach to further examine the psychosocial processes involved in the association between trauma and disordered eating. In addition, further genetic and epigenetic investigations of causal mechanisms are needed.

Rates of subthreshold PTSD among the total sample as well as women and men with EDs were higher than those reported by Inniss et al. (52). These authors noted that the rates of PTSD in their Canadian sample generally tend to be lower than those reported in the U.S. population. In the current study, the forms of subthreshold and partial PTSD most common among women and men with EDs were those that lowered the threshold for Criterion C or eliminated this criterion. This is not surprising, considering concerns that the requirement of three Criterion C (avoidance/numbing) symptoms is too stringent. Indeed, as of this writing, the proposed criteria for DSM-5 include a threshold of one symptom for this cluster (see http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=165).

Although this study has several strengths, some limitations should be noted. First, because of the structure of the questionnaire, age at the time of first trauma was not assessed. For those participants who experienced multiple traumas, it is possible that an early trauma was not evaluated, as PTSD symptoms were only assessed for the exposures participants self-identified as their worst, and one chosen at random by the interviewer. In addition, it was not possible to accurately compare ages of onset of trauma/PTSD and disordered eating, as the true age of onset for trauma was unknown. Lastly, there may be important differences between individuals with chronic trauma exposure and chronic PTSD, relative to those with single traumas or lifetime PTSD diagnoses, which were not captured in the current study. Thus, more research is needed to investigate the temporal relation of PTSD and EDs among women as well as men.

Assessment of PTSD was further limited by the use of skip-outs. Participants who did not report at least one symptom for a given PTSD criterion skipped subsequent questions regarding other criteria. Thus, investigation of partial PTSD was somewhat limited in the current study. Despite this caveat, however, the pattern of results was similar for partial and subthreshold PTSD, suggesting that lowering the threshold for Criterion C (or dropping this criterion, for partial PTSD), resulted in increased rates of PTSD among individuals with EDs.

Assessment of EDs was limited by the compound nature of the questions, as previously described by Hudson et al. (46). Specifically, frequency and duration were built into the questions assessing whether participants had ever binged or used compensatory behaviors, rather than being asked separately. Therefore, assessment of DSM-IV BED was not entirely possible in this study. This module also used skip-outs, which were especially stringent for the BN/BED section, as participants who had never binged at least twice per week for several months or longer skipped to the next section.

In sum, men as well as women with trauma and PTSD have higher rates of EDs than the general population. Thus, although the absolute number of men with EDs remains small, affected individuals have high rates of comorbidity that are comparable to those observed in female samples. Future research should continue to include both men and women and investigate interactions among psychosocial, biological, and genetic factors which increase the risk for comorbid PTSD and EDs.

Supplementary Material

Supp Table S1
Supp Table S2
Supp Table S3
Supp Table S4
Supp Table S5
Supp Table S6

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Grant MH-068520 (PI, Mazzeo).

Footnotes

Disclosures. The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

  • 1.Jacobi C, Hayward C, de Zwaan M, Kraemer HC, Agras WS. Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(1):19–65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brewerton TD. Eating disorders, trauma, and comorbidity: Focus on PTSD. Eat Disord. 2007;15(4):285–304. doi: 10.1080/10640260701454311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mazzeo SE, Espelage DL. Association between childhood physical and emotional abuse and disordered eating behaviors in female undergraduates: An investigation of the mediating role of alexithymia and depression. J Couns Psychol. 2002;49(1):86–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mazzeo SE, Mitchell KS, Williams LJ. Anxiety, alexithymia, and depression as mediators of the association between childhood abuse and eating disordered behavior in African American and European American women. Psychol Women Q. 2008;32:267–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mitchell KS, Mazzeo SE. Mediators of the association between abuse and disordered eating in undergraduate men. Eat Behav. 2005;6(4):318–27. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yehuda R. Biology of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(Suppl17):41–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sack M, Boroske-Leiner K, Lahmann C. Association of nonsexual and sexual traumatizations with body image and psychosomatic symptoms in psychosomatic outpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(3):315–320. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dunkley DM, Masheb RM, Grilo CM. Childhood maltreatment, depressive symptoms, and body dissatisfaction in patients with binge eating disorder: the mediating role of self-criticism. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43(3):274–81. doi: 10.1002/eat.20796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dansky BS, Brewerton TD, Kilpatrick DG, O’Neil PM. The National Women’s Study: Relationship of victimization and posttraumatic stress disorder to bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 1997;21(3):213–228. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199704)21:3<213::aid-eat2>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mitchell KS, Wells SY, Mendes A, Resick PA. Improvement of disordered eating symptoms secondary to PTSD treatment. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beales DL, Dolton R. Eating disordered patients: Personality, alexithymia, and implications for primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(450):21–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frewen PA, Dozois DJ, Neufeld RW, Lanius RA. Meta-analysis of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21(2):243–6. doi: 10.1002/jts.20320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shipko S, Alvarez WA, Noviello N. Towards a teleological model of alexithymia: alexithymia and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychother Psychosom. 1983;39(2):122–126. doi: 10.1159/000287730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeitlin SB, McNally RJ, Cassiday KL. Alexithymia in victims of sexual assault: an effect of repeated traumatization? Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(4):661–663. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.4.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brewerton TD. Eating disorders, victimization and PTSD: Principles of treatment. In: Brewerton TD, editor. Clinical Handbook of Eating Disorders: An Integrated Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2004. pp. 509–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blinder BJ, Cumella EJ, Sanathara VA. Psychiatric Comorbidities of Female Inpatients With Eating Disorders. Psychol Med. 2006;68:454–462. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221254.77675.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaye WH, Bulik CM, Thornton L, Barbarich N, Masters K. Comorbidity of anxiety disorders with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:2215. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Corstorphine E, Mountford V, Tomlinson S, Waller G, Meyer C. Distress tolerance in the eating disorders. Eat Behav. 2007;8:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ehlers A, Clark DM. A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research Therapy. 2000;38(4):319–45. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kashdan TB, Breen WE, Julian T. Everyday strivings in war veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Suffering from a hyper-focus on avoidance and emotion regulation. Behavior Therapy. 2010;41:350–63. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Litz BT. Emotional numbing in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: A critical review and reformulation. Clinical Psychology Review. 1992;12(4):417–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller MW, Resick PA. Internalizing and externalizing subtypes in female sexual assault survivors: Implications for the understanding of complex PTSD. Behavior Therapy. 2007;38(1):58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sacks MB, Flood AM, Dennis MF, Hertzberg MA, Beckham JC. Self-mutilative behaviors in male veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2008;42(6):487–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tull MT, Barrett HM, McMillan ES, Roemer L. A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship Between Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms. Behavior Therapy. 2007;38(3):303–13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bulik CM, Klump KK, Thornton L, Kaplan AS, Devlin B, Fichter MM, et al. Alcohol use disorder comorbidity in eating disorders: A multicenter study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:1000–1006. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cassin SE, von Ranson KM. Personality and eating disorders: A decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2005;25(7):895–916. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Claes L, Vandereycken W, Vertommen H. Impulsive and compulsive traits in eating disordered patients compared with controls. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002;32:707–714. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dykens EM, Gerrard M. Psychological profiles of purging bulimics, repeat dieters, and controls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986;54(3):283–288. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.54.3.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Blinder BJ, Cumella EJ, Sanathara VA. Psychiatric comorbidities of female inpatients with eating disorders. Psychol Med. 2006;68:454. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221254.77675.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carter JC, Bewell C, Blackmore E, Woodside DB. The impact of childhood sexual abuse in anorexia nervosa. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(3):257. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reyes-Rodriguez M, Von Holle A, Ulman TF, Thornton LM, Klump KL, Brandt H, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in anorexia nervosa. Psychosom Med. 2011;73 doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31822232bb. published ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Van Gerko K, Hughes ML, Hamill M, Waller G. Reported childhood sexual abuse and eating-disordered cognitions and behaviors. Child Abuse Negl. 2005;29:375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pitman RK, Delahanty DL. Conceptually Driven Pharmacologic Approaches To Acute Trauma. CNS Spectrums. 2005;10(2):99–106. doi: 10.1017/s109285290001943x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dautzenberg FM, Hauger RL. The CRF peptide family and their receptors: yet more partners discovered. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2002;23(2):71–77. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(02)01946-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Charney DS. Psychobiological Mechanisms of Resilience and Vulnerability: Implications for Successful Adaptation to Extreme Stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2):195–216. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wust S, Federenko IS, van Rossum EF, Koper JW, Kumsta R, Entringer S, Hellhammer DH. A psychobiological perspective on genetic determinants of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Annals of the New York Acadamy of Sciences. 2004;1032:52–62. doi: 10.1196/annals.1314.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsuda K, Goldstein M, Masuyama Y. Neuropeptide Y and galanin enhance the inhibitory effects of clonidine on norepinephrine release from medulla oblongata of rats. American Journal of Hypertension. 1990;3(10):800–2. doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.10.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM, Verchinski BA, Munoz KE, Kolachana BS, Egan MF, Mattay VS, Hariri AR, Weinberger DR. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(6):828–34. doi: 10.1038/nn1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Puglisi-Allegra S, Cabib S. Psychopharmacology of dopamine: The contribution of comparative studies in inbred strains of mice. Progress in Neurobiology. 1997;51(6):637–61. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steiger H, Joober R, Israel M, Young SN, Ng Ying Kin NM, Gauvin L, Bruce KR, Joncas J, Torkaman-Zehi A. The 5HTTLPR polymorphism, psychopathologic symptoms, and platelet [3H-] paroxetine binding in bulimic syndromes. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;37(1):57–60. doi: 10.1002/eat.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cellini E, Castellini G, Ricca V, Bagnoli S, Tedde A, Rotella CM, Faravelli C, Sorbi S, Nacmias B. Glucocorticoid receptor gene polymorphisms in Italian patients with eating disorders and obesity. Psychiatric Genetics. 2010 doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32833a2142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Warne JP, Dallman MF. Stress, diet and abdominal obesity: Y? Nature Medicine. 2007;13(7):781–3. doi: 10.1038/nm0707-781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Di Bella D, Catalano M, Cavallini MC, Riboldi C, Bellodi L. Serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Molecular Psychiatry. 2000;5(3):233–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shinohara M, Mizushima H, Hirano M, Shioe K, Nakazawa M, Hiejima Y, Ono Y, Kanba S. Eating disorders with binge-eating behaviour are associated with the s allele of the 3’-UTR VNTR polymorphism of the dopamine transporter gene. Journal of Psychiatry Neuroscience. 2004;29:134–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG, Jr, Kessler RC. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(3):348. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smith DE, Marcus MD, Lewis CE, Fitzgibbon M, Schreiner P. Prevalence of binge eating disorder, obesity, and depression in a biracial cohort of young adults. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20(3):227–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02884965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brady KT, Killeen TK, Brewerton T, Lucerini S. Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(Suppl 7):22–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lipschitz DS, Kaplan ML, Sorkenn JB, Faedda GL, Chorney P, Asnis GM. Prevalence and characteristics of physical and sexual abuse among psychiatric outpatients. Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47:189–191. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Spitzer RL, First MB, Wakefield JC. Saving PTSD from itself in DSM-V. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(2):233–41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Palm KM, Strong DR, MacPherson L. Evaluating symptom expression as a functioning of posttraumatic stress disorder severity. J Anxiety Disord. 1999;23:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Inniss D, Steiger H, Bruce K. Threshold and subthreshold post-traumatic stress disorder in bulimic patients: Prevalences and clinical correlates. Eating and Weight Disorders. 2011;16:e30–e36. doi: 10.1007/BF03327518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kessler RC, Üstün T. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93. doi: 10.1002/mpr.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Chiu WT, Demler O, Heeringa S, Hiripi E, Jin R, Pennell B-E, Walters EE, Zaslavsky A, Zheng H. The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): Design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):69. doi: 10.1002/mpr.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kessler RC, Merikangas KR. The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13:60–68. doi: 10.1002/mpr.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(12):1048–60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Table S1
Supp Table S2
Supp Table S3
Supp Table S4
Supp Table S5
Supp Table S6

RESOURCES