Abstract
Twenty-four Ixodes dammini ticks (23 adults and one nymph) have been recovered in Nova Scotia since 1984. There has not been a systematic search for larvae and none has been identified. The recovery of the nymph from a road-killed yellow throat bird, Geothypis trichas, in late May 1990 supports the contention that migrating birds are bringing deer ticks into the province every spring. In March and April 1991, four adult deer ticks were identified, suggesting that these ticks had overwintered. These deer tick specimens indicate that it is possible that I dammini is becoming established in Nova Scotia, if it is not already established. There has been no evidence for the existence of Borrelia burgdorferi in the province. The spirochete was not cultured from 650 Dermacentor variabilis ticks, nor were antibodies detected in a small sample of feral rodents using an indirect fluorescent antibody test. A survey of 137 dog sera samples, analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, also proved negative. There has been no confirmed indigenous case of Lyme disease in Nova Scotia to date.
Keywords: Borrelia burgdorferi, Dermacentor variabilis, Ixodes dammini, Lyme disease, Nova Scotia
RÉSUMÉ:
On a trouvé 24 tiques Ixodes dammini (23 adultes et une nymphe) en Nouvelle-Écosse depuis 1984. Les larves n’ont pas été systématiquement recherchées et aucune n’a été identifiées. La découverte d’une nymphe chez une fauvette masquée (Geothypis trichas) tuée sur la route, à la fin mai 1990 appuie l’hypothése selon laquelle les oiseaux migrateurs apportent la tique du wapiti dans la province chaque année. En mars et avril 1991, quatre tiques du wapiti adultes ont été identifiées, suggérant que ces tiques avaient hiverné et que I dammini est en voie de s’établir en Nouvelle-Écosse – si ce n’est déjà fait. Rien ne semble indiquer la présence de Borrelia burgdorferi dans la province. Aucun spirochète n’a été mis en culture à partir de 650 Dermacentor variabilis (tique du chien) et aucun anticorps n’a été décelé par immunofluorescence indirecte dans un petit échantillon de rongeurs sauvages. L’analyse de 137 sérums de chien effectuée par la méthode enzymo-immunologique a donné elle aussi des résultats négatifs. Jusqu’à ce jour, aucun cas indigène de borréliose de Lyme n’a été confirmé en Nouvelle-Écosse.
Tick-borne lyme disease was recognized and characterized in North America in the early 1970s (1,2). There have now been thousands of cases reported throughout the contiguous United States which have contributed to the present awareness of the etiology and epidemiology of the disease in the United States (3,4). Information on the disease in Canada is not as complete.
The first case of Lyme disease in Canada was diagnosed in 1977 (5), and at a symposium on Lyme disease in Canada conducted at the University of Guelph in January 1991 (6), it was revealed that 65 indigenous cases of the disease had been reported to the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control in the previous seven years (personal communication). Fifty-four of these cases were limited to Ontario, with only one case occurring in the Maritimes, in New Brunswick (7). However, there has been some concern expressed by health professionals about the potential for the disease in Nova Scotia largely because of the proximity to disease foci in the state of Maine (8) and the possibility that migrating birds could be introducing infected Ixodes dammini ticks into the province each spring (9). Certainly because of the very large numbers of Dermacentor variabilis ticks in Nova Scotia (10), introduced at the turn of the century, there is palpable concern among the general public. These factors provided the impetus in 1984 for this continuing search for the Lyme disease agent, Borrelia burgdorferi, and the vector, I dammini, in Nova Scotia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1988 Collection of D variabilis:
In the summer of 1988 ticks were collected from seven field sites within the area endemic for D variabilis in south western Nova Scotia. Adults were collected using a 0.5 m2 flag dragged over vegetation along roadsides and clearings near woods. The boundaries of the area sampled were established from the studies of Garvie et al (10) and Dodds et al (11). Data for the distribution in 1985 were obtained by flagging of vegetation, as described, at random sites, together with submissions from the public (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Distribution of Dermacentor variabilis and the location of the 1988 field sites in southwestern Nova Scotia. (Solid circles represent 1985 data)
1988 Collection of small mammals:
Live trapping for small mammals was performed at the seven sites from mid May to August. The sites were: Granite village, Queens County; Lower Shag Harbour, Shelburne County: Ellenwood Provincial Park, Yarmouth County; Meteghan Station, Digby County; South Milford, Annapolis County; Lequille, Annapolis County; and West Paradise, Annapolis County.
Approximately 100 to 130 traps (Sherman 9 inch live traps: HB Sherman, Florida) were set each night at each site for four nights to give an average of 450 trap nights per site and 4960 trap-nights for all sites for the entire season (West Paradise was sampled for three weeks).
Ticks and mammals were returned to Acadia University each week for identification and processing. Ticks were identified with the keys of Kierans and Litwak (12), Kierans and Clifford (13) and Sonenshine (14).
1988 Cultivation of B burgdorferi from ticks and small mammals and seroconversion:
Adult ticks from each site were pooled into sets of five by sex. After surface sterilization with 70% volume/volume ethanol, 10% volume/volume hydrogen peroxide and rinsing with sterile water, the ticks were homogenized in a sterile mortar and pestle with 2.0 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4).
Mammals were anesthetized, exsanguinated by cardiac puncture and the spleen and kidney excised and homogenized in a Potter Elvehjem tissue grinder in 2.0 mL PBS. Blood samples were allowed to clot by incubation at 37°C for 20 mins; sera were then separated by centrifugation and stored at −70°C.
Samples (50 μL) of tick and mammal organ homogenate were inoculated, in duplicate, into 8 mL Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK II) medium with antibiotics (15) and incubated for up to three months at 33°C. Positive controls were run by inoculation with B burgdorferi ATCC 35210. The presence of spirochetes in the medium was determined after at least two months incubation by epifluorescence microscopy with acridine orange (16,17).
Antibodies to B burgdorferi in the Peromyscus leucopus specimens were determined using the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test described by Wilkinson (18), with slight modifications by Artsob (personal communication) using fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit antimouse polyclonal sera (Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd).
1990 Canine seroprevalence testing:
Antibodies to B burgdorferi in domestic dogs were tested in sera collected in 1990 with the assistance of three veterinary clinics in the province. These were: Bayview Animal Clinic, Digby (Dr N Pothier): TriCounty Veterinary Services, Arcadia, near Yarmouth (Dr T O’Brien); and Cape Breton Veterinary Services, Sydney (Dr B Buick). The location of these clinics is shown in Figure 2. The veterinarians were asked to bleed up to 50 dogs from each clinic. The dogs had to be over six months old and to have always lived in Nova Scotia. If the dogs had visited an area endemic for Lyme disease the owners were asked to indicate this on an accompanying questionnaire. Sampling began at the beginning of May 1990 and continued until the beginning of November, when the vials were collected. Each dog was bled once only, and all sera were kept frozen after separation.
Figure 2.
Location of Ixodes dammini recovered in Nova Scotia and the three veterinary clinics participating in the canine serosurvey
This phase of the project was performed in collaboration with the Maine Medical Center in Portland, Maine, which supplied all blood sampling equipment and arranged for analysis at the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory of Tufts University. The sera were shipped frozen to Boston and analyzed for seroconversion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (19).
1984 to 1991 Collection of I dammini:
All I dammini specimens were submitted by the general public. Initial identification was through the keys mentioned above (11–14). Independent confirmation was obtained by sending the specimen to at least one of the following authorities: JE Kierans, Georgia Southern University; EE Lundquist, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa; WD McEnroe, University of Massachussetts; or EH Lacombe, Maine Medical Center.
In 1990 live trapping was conducted in Digby County from May 12 to June 21 in an attempt to recover I dammini from small mammals. Attention was focused on Digby County because many of the deer ticks identified had been submitted from this part of the province. Traps (Ugglan multiple live traps; Hillerstorp, Sweden) were set for a total of 1017 trap-nights in numerous localities. These included Barton, Belliveau Cove, Brighton, Centerville, Concession, Jeremy’s Mill, Major’s Point, Medway Lake, Plympton, Riverdale, St Mary’s Bay and Weymouth.
RESULTS
Occurrence of B burgdorferi with D variabilis:
A total of 650 ticks (405 male, 245 female) were collected from the 1988 sampling programme. Examination of BSK II media did not reveal spirochetes in any of the tubes, although there was heavy growth of rods and cocci. Tubes with filamentous structures suggestive of spirochetes were shipped to RA Wirtz of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington DC. Indirect fluorescent antibody testing with both species-specific monoclonal H5332 and genus-specific H9724 confirmed that they all were negative. Control tubes produced positive growth of B burgdorferi.
Occurrence of B burgdorferi and seroconversion in small mammals:
The 1988 live trapping captured 87 animals consisting of one Blarina brevicauda, one Napaeozapus insiguis, two Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, three Tamias striatus, 36 Peromyscus leucopus and 44 Clethrionmys gapperi. Inoculation of spleen and kidney homogenates in BSK II for spirochetes all proved negative. Indirect fluorescent antibody testing performed on 20 of the P leucopus serum samples all proved negative (titres less than 1:8). The remaining 16 specimens could not be tested because of inadequate blood recovery.
The 1990 trapping program captured 19 mice representing two species (18 Zapus hudsonius and one P leucopus) and 27 shrews representing two species, all of which died upon capture. No I dammini were found on any of these animals.
Seroprevalence in dogs:
A total of 137 serum samples were collected from the three veterinary clinics (50 from Digby, 46 from Arcadia and 41 from Sydney). Analyses at Tufts University revealed that all were negative – in fact, well below the critical optical density of 0.170, which represents a value three standard deviations above that of sera from dogs from nonendemic areas.
Occurrence of I dammini:
Since 1984 a total of 23 adult and one nymphal I dammini have been recovered from Nova Scotia (Table 1), all through submissions from the general public. The distribution of these ticks did not follow any obvious pattern (Figure 2). Prior to 1991 the majority of adult deer ticks were submitted in the fall, the earliest submission occurring in June 1991 has been exceptional in that four adult ticks were recovered in March and April.
TABLE 1.
Ixodes dammini recovered in Nova Scotia
Location | Stage/sex | Host | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Aylesford | Adult/female | Cat | July 84 |
Halifax | Adult/female | On lawn | Nov 84 |
Little River | Adult/female | Dog | Nov 84 |
Amherst | – | Human | Nov 88 |
Waterville | Adult/female | Dog | May 89 |
Canard | Adult/female | Human | Oct 89 |
Black River | Adult/female | Dog | Oct 89 |
Centreville | Adult/female | Cat | Nov 89 |
White Rock | Adult/female | Cat | Nov 89 |
Petite Rivière | Adult/female | Cat | Nov 89 |
Plympton | Adult/female | Dog | Nov 89 |
Central Grove | Adult/female | Cat | Nov 89 |
Bear River | Adult/female | Dog | Nov 89 |
Antigonish | Adult/female | Human | June 90 |
Windsor | Nymph | Yellow throat | June 90 |
Antigonish | Adult/male | Human | July 90 |
Second Peninsula | Adult/female | Dog | Oct 90 |
Church Point | Adult/female | Human | Nov 90 |
Port Mouton | Adult/female | Cat | Nov 90 |
Yarmouth | Adult/female | Veterinary sample | Fall 90 |
Weymouth Falls | Adult/female | Dog | March 91 |
Sandford | Adult/female | Human | March 91 |
Gullivers Cove | Adult/male | Cat | April 91 |
Margaretsville | Adult/female | Human | April 91 |
The one nymph was recovered from a recently migrated yellow throat bird, Geothypis trichas (Linnaeus), which was killed after colliding with the windshield of a car in Windsor.
DISCUSSION
The distribution of D variabilis in Canada is in southern Ontario, southern Manitoba, southeastern Saskatchewan and southwestern Nova Scotia (5,20). There was initial concern that this tick could act as a vector for Lyme disease because specimens found in the field were infected with B burgdorferi (21,22). Evidence has since accumulated which suggests that D variabilis may not be a competent vector for the disease largely because of the tick’s inability for transtadial transmission (23,24). Thus the infected D variabilis found by Anderson et al (21) and Barker et al (22) presumably reflect ticks which have recently fed on hosts infected with the spirochete but will not maintain the bacterium long enough to represent a major transmission route to humans.
The data presented here on the zero infection of 650 D variabilis specimens from Nova Scotia is in keeping with this idea. It is also in keeping with more recent findings from Ontario where D variabilis ticks sampled outside the endemic area of Long Point have never shown infection with spirochetes (personal communication), and also from Manitoba, where a large survey of D variabilis produced negative results (25,26).
The recovery of 24 I dammini from various locations around the province is more intriguing and relevant to potential Lyme disease. This collection of 24 deer ticks represents the highest recovery in Canada, excluding Long Point (27). Larvae have not been observed in the province (see addendum) so these specimens cannot be considered members of an indigenous population. A statistically valid search for larvae has never been conducted and is needed, in light of the number of adult specimens recovered.
The deer ticks have been submitted from most regions of the province with the exception of Cape Breton Island (see addendum). Such a dispersion is probably the result of ticks dropping off birds as they alight on their northward migration. Certainly the infestation of birds in the New England states has been well documented (9,28,29), and the recovery of the nymph on a Yellow throat in the first week of June 1990 supports this contention. The 19 adult I dammini collected in years prior to 1991 could then represent nymphs introduced on birds in the same years. It was believed that such populations posed little threat to the establishment of an indigenous population because these ticks would probably perish during the winter.
The recovery of four adult I dammini (the three females were all engorged) in early spring 1991 is an interesting development. It is likely that these ticks had overwintered; the spring bird migration had not yet begun, and there are no records of adult I dammini infesting birds (30). Of course, even these overwintered ticks may have originated from nymphs introduced by birds the previous summer; it nonetheless raises the possibility of a spring breeding season in addition to a fall season (31). The provision of two breeding seasons increases the chance of successful mating which is recognized as the most serious impediment to the completion of the three-host life cycle of the deer tick.
I dammini have been recorded in the state of Maine as far north as Machias (32), with indigenous populations documented further south (8,33,34). Some of these more isolated deer tick populations, such as the one on Monhegan Island, may have been introduced by birds (personal communication). Generally, the distribution of deer ticks in the state follows a 32 km strip next to the coast, which could reflect the moderating influence of the ocean on temperature. Nova Scotia has a similar oceanic climate; indeed, there are pockets such as the Annapolis Valley where the climate provides a warm summer (35), which could be amenable to the establishment of I dammini. Certainly the province appears no more inhospitable to I dammini than the northern states of Maine or Wisconsin with their established foci (36,37).
If I dammini is moving into Nova Scotia, there is no evidence that B burgdorferi is present. In addition to the negative results reported here on the cultivation of the spirochete from small mammals, seroconversion in small mammals, and seroconversion in dogs, there has been no confirmed case of Lyme disease in the human population (personal communication). Magnarelli et al (38,39) found high titres of B burgdorferi in 20.5% of the rodent population in endemic areas of New England, and Anderson et al (40) were able to culture spirochetes from 75% of the small mammal population in Connecticut. Obviously Nova Scotia does not compare to these high incidence areas.
The canine serosurvey represents more persuasive evidence on the low incidence in Nova Scotia. The data presented here do not suffer from the quoted problems of cross-reactivity and false positives (41) as it is exceptional for its lack of reactivity. Lindenmayer et al (19) after a comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay used in the present study reported a maximum specificity of 93.5% (18). A false positive percentage of 6.5% did not apply to these data. The 41 samples taken from Sydney were designed as negative controls because of the lack of ticks D variabilis and I dammini on Cape Breton Island. The questionnaire completed by the owners confirmed that this was the case. In contrast, the dogs sampled in Digby and Yarmouth Counties experienced a considerable tick load. The exceptionally low level of reactivity in all three populations suggests that Lyme disease is not yet present in the province’s dogs.
The complete lack of evidence of B burgdorferi in Nova Scotia is reassuring news for the general public. Perhaps it is not too surprising considering the limited number of the classic vector, I dammini, and the confirmation that the abundant tick, D variabilis, is not a competent vector. The situation deserves careful monitoring in the years ahead. The deer ticks found in Nova Scotia over the past seven years could represent small pockets of established populations or may indicate adventitious populations attempting to establish themselves. If the latter, then the millions of birds migrating through the province every year and bringing nymphs with them constitute a formidable ‘attempt’ each spring which should not be ignored. Weisbrod and Johnson (42) demonstrated that approximately 1% of the birds in the central flyway were infested with I dammini, and of these deer ticks about 20% were infected with B burgdorferi.
Maine is now considered an emerging area for Lyme disease, with 26 documented cases (14 acquired in the state) and indigenous populations of I dammini in the south of the state (32). The vector is crucial to the epidemiology of the disease (43), and in order to predict if Nova Scotia could become an emerging area for Lyme disease in Atlantic Canada, further clarification of the status of I dammini in the province is required.
ADDENDUM
A gravid I dammini adult was discovered on Cape Breton Island in the summer of 1991. The eggs ultimately hatched into larvae. Full details have been submitted to Canada Communicable Disease Report.
Acknowledgments
The assistance of Drs Peter W Rand, Robert P Smith Jr and Eleanor H Lacombe of the Maine Medical Center in Portland, Maine in numerous phases of this study was invaluable. We are particularly indebted to the free sharing of all their information on the status of Lyme disease in Maine. The cultivation of B burgdorferi and indirect fluorescent antibody tests were made possible by assistance of Dr Harvey Artsob of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control in Ottawa. The canine serosurvey would not have been possible without the considerable time donated by Drs Pothier, O’Brien and Buick, and several of their colleagues. The 1988 field site data collection was performed by KK Kalicharran as part of his uncompleted honours thesis. The 1990 data collection was supported by a research grant from the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Fitness, and we appreciate numerous discussions with the provincial epidemiologist Dr John C LeBlanc.
REFERENCES
- 1.Steere AC, Malawista SE, Hardin JA, Ruddy S, Askenase W, Andiman WA. Erythema chronicum migrans and Lyme arthritis: The enlarging clinical syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86:685–98. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-86-6-685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steere AC, Broderick TF, Malawista SE. Erythema chronicum migrans and Lyme arthritis: Epidemiologic evidence for a tick vector. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108:312–21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schmid GP, Horsley R, Steere AC, et al. Surveillance of Lyme disease in the United States. J Infect Dis. 1982;151:1144–9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.6.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Steere AC. Lyme disease. New Engl J Med. 1989;321:586–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198908313210906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bollegraaf E. Lyme disease in Canada. Can Dis Weekly Rep. 1988;14:95–7. 115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Consensus Conference on Lyme disease. Can J Infect Dis. 1991;2:49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mackenzie SG. Lyme disease in Canada. Can Dis Weekly Rep. 1990:16–30. 141–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ginsberg HS, Ewing C. Deer ticks, Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) and Lyme disease spirochetes, Borrelia burgdorferi, in Maine. J Med Entomol. 1988;25:303–4. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/25.4.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Anderson JF, Johnson RC, Magnarelli LA, Hyde FW. Involvement of birds in the epidemiology of the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1986;51:394–6. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.2.394-396.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garvie MB, McKiel JA, Sonenshine DE, Campbell A. Seasonal dynamics of American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), populations in southwestern Nova Scotia. Can J Zool. 1978;56:28–39. doi: 10.1139/z78-004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dodds DG, Martell AM, Yescott RE. Ecology of the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), in Nova Scotia. Can J Zool. 1969;47:171–81. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kierans JE, Litwak TR. Pictorial guide to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), east of the Mississippi River. J Med Entomol. 1989;26:435–48. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/26.5.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kierans JE, Clifford CM. The genus Ixodes in the United States: A scanning electron microscope study and key to the adults. J Med Entomol. 1978;(Suppl 2):1–149. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/15.suppl2.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sonenshine DE. Insects of Virginia No. 13. Ticks of Virginia (Acari: Metastigmata) Res Div Bull. 1979;139 (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univeristy, Blacksburg, VA 24061) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barbour AG, Burgdorfer W, Hayes SF, Peter O, Aeschlimann A. Isolation of a cultivable spirochete from Ixodes ricinus ticks of Switzerland. Curr Microbiol. 1983;8:123–6. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lauer BA, Reller LB, Mirrett S. Comparison of acridine orange and Gram stains for detection of microorganisms in cerebrospinal fluid and other clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;14:201–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.2.201-205.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barbour AG. Laboratory aspects of Lyme disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1:399–414. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.4.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilkinson HW. Immunodiagnostic tests for Lyme disease. Yale J Biol Med. 1984;57:567–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lindenmayer J, Weber M, Bryant J, Marquez E, Onderdonk A. Comparison of indirect immunoflourescent-antibody assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and western immunoblot for the diagnosis of Lyme disease in dogs. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:92–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.1.92-96.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gregson JD. The Ixodoidea of Canada. 1956. (Canada Department of Agriculure Division of Entomology; Publication 930)
- 21.Anderson JF, Johnson RC, Magnarelli LA, Hyde FW. Identification of endemic foci of Lyme disease: Isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from feral rodents and ticks (Dermacentor variabilis) J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22:36–8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.36-38.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barker IK, Surgeoner GA, McEwen SA, Artsob H. Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease, in tick vectors and wildlife reservoirs in southern Ontario. Ont Dis Surveil Rep. 1988;9:151–4. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Piesman J, Sinsky RJ. Ability of Ixodes scapularis, Dermacentor variabilis, and Ambyloma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) to acquire, maintain and transmit Lyme disease spirochetes Borrelia burgdorferi. J Med Entomol. 1988;25:336–9. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/25.5.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mather TN, Mather ME. Intrinsic competence of 3 ixodid ticks (Acari) as vectors of the Lyme disease spirochete. J Med Entomol. 1990;27:646–50. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/27.4.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Galloway TD. Lyme disease vector, Ixodes dammini, identified in Manitoba. Can Dis Weekly Rep. 1989;15:185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sekla L, Stackiw W, Poffenroth L, Roberts A. Lyme disease in Manitoba. Can Dis Weekly Rep. 1990:16–30. 147–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Costero A. Identification of the Lyme disease vector in Canada. Can Dis Weekly Rep. 1990:16–30. 142–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Battaly GR, Fish D, Dowler RC. The seasonal occurence of Ixodes dammini and Ixodes dentatus (Acari: Ixodidae) on birds in a Lyme disease endemic area of southeastern New York state. J NY Ent Soc. 1987;95:461–8. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Avian and mammalian hosts for spirochete-infected ticks and insects in a Lyme disease focus in Connecticut. Yale J Biol Med. 1984;57:627–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Anderson JF. Mammalian and avian reservoirs for Borrelia burgdorferi. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988;539:180–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb31852.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McEnroe WD. Climatic regulation of the two-cohort population of Ixodes dammini in coastal Massachusetts. Acarologia. 1990;31:235–9. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rand PW, Smith RP, Lacombe EH. Canine seroprevalence and the distribution of Ixodes dammini in an area of emerging Lyme disease. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1331–4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.10.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Smith RP, Rand PW, LaCombe EH. Potential for Lyme disease in Maine: Deer survey of distribution of Ixodes dammini, the tick vector. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1–2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA, McAninch JB. Ixodes dammini and Borrelia burgdorferi in northern New England and upstate New York. J Parasitol. 1987;73:419–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leefe JS. Summary of weather records, 1914–1958. Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture, Research Station; Kentville, Nova Scotia: Publication 1092. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Anon Lyme disease and cases occurring during pregnancy – United States. Update. MMWR. 1985;34:376–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jackson JO, DeFoliart GR. Ixodes scapularis Say in northern Wisconsin. J Med Entomol. 1970;7:124–5. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/7.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, Burgdorfer W, Chappell WA. Parsitism by Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) and antibodies to spirochetes in mammals at Lyme disease foci in Connecticut, USA. J Med Entomol. 1984;21:52–7. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/21.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, Hyland KE, Fish D, McAninch JB. Serologic analyses of Peromyscus leucopus, a rodent reservoir for Borrelia burgdorferi, in northeastern United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1138–41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1138-1141.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anderson JF, Johnson RC, Magnarelli LA. Seasonal prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in natural populations of white-footed mice. Peromyscus leucopus. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1564–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1564-1566.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schultze TL, Bosler EM, Shisler JK, Ware IC, Lakat MF, Parkin WE. Prevalence of canine Lyme disease from an endemic area as determined by serosurvey. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 1986;263:427–34. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80104-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weisbrod AR, Johnson RC. Lyme disease and migrating birds in the St Croix River valley. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:1921–4. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.8.1921-1924.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Coombs BA. The potential for Lyme disease in Nova Scotia Acadia University, 1989: 154. (Dissertation) [Google Scholar]