Skip to main content
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition logoLink to The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
. 2012 Feb 15;95(4):892–900. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.020156

Choline intake in a large cohort of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease123

Anthony L Guerrerio, Ryan M Colvin, Amy K Schwartz, Jean P Molleston, Karen F Murray, AnnaMae Diehl, Parvathi Mohan, Jeffrey B Schwimmer, Joel E Lavine, Michael S Torbenson, Ann O Scheimann
PMCID: PMC3302364  PMID: 22338037

Abstract

Background: There is significant histologic and biochemical overlap between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis associated with choline deficiency.

Objective: We sought to determine whether subjects with biopsy-proven NAFLD and evidence of an inadequate intake of choline had more severe histologic features.

Design: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 664 subjects enrolled in the multicenter, prospective Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) with baseline data on diet composition (from a recall-based food-frequency questionnaire) within 6 mo of a liver biopsy. Food questionnaires were analyzed with proprietary software to estimate daily intakes of choline. Liver biopsies were centrally read, and consensus was scored with the NASH CRN–developed scoring system. Because choline needs vary by age, sex, and menopausal status, participants were segregated into corresponding categories (children 9–13 y old, males ≥14 y old, premenopausal women ≥19 y old, and postmenopausal women) on the basis of the Institute of Medicine's definition of adequate intake (AI) for choline. Deficient intake was defined as <50% AI.

Results: Postmenopausal women with deficient choline intake had worse fibrosis (P = 0.002) once factors associated with NAFLD (age, race-ethnicity, obesity, elevated triglycerides, diabetes, alcohol use, and steroid use) were considered in multiple ordinal logistic regression models. Choline intake was not identified as a contributor to disease severity in children, men, or premenopausal women.

Conclusion: Decreased choline intake is significantly associated with increased fibrosis in postmenopausal women with NAFLD. The Pioglitazone vs Vitamin E vs Placebo for Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00063622, and the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00063635.

INTRODUCTION

The spectrum of NAFLD4 includes NASH, which is an inflammatory process with accompanying hepatocellular necrosis and subsequent fibrosis. NASH can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure and is associated with an increased risk of development of hepatocellular carcinoma (13). Current estimates place the prevalence of NAFLD in the general US population at 1 in 3 people, whereas 1 in 20 people have NASH (2, 3). Progression to steatohepatitis is not imminent or absolute in all patients with NAFLD. A second insult may be necessary for the activation of proinflammatory pathways that results in the development of a chronic inflammatory reaction in a liver rendered vulnerable by the accumulation of fat (46).

In one animal model of steatohepatitis, rodents that consumed a high-fat, methionine and choline–deficient diet developed steatosis with inflammation and hepatic necrosis with the eventual development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Some strains of mice also manifest hepatic fibrosis. Hepatic fibrosis also developed in rodents that consumed a choline and B-12–deficient diet as well as a choline-deficient diet alone, although histologic changes developed more slowly. Although the liver histology of rodents on a methionine and choline–deficient diet may be similar to that with NASH, the overall phenotype of these mice is significantly different because they tend to lose weight on this diet and are not insulin resistant (712).

Choline is a quaternary amine present in all mammalian tissues. Foods high in choline include dairy, liver, eggs, legumes, nuts, beef, leafy greens, seed oils, and grain germs (13). Choline is an essential component of cell membranes and is required for the synthesis of phospholipids. Choline is a precursor for the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and serves as a methyl group donor (14). Despite endogenous pathways for choline synthesis (15), humans on a low-choline diet will develop choline deficiency (16). Furthermore, humans on long-term parenteral nutrition that lacks adequate choline will show a reversal of hepatic steatosis and a decrease in serum aminotransferases with choline supplementation. The pathologic changes return with the cessation of choline supplementation (17, 18).

In addition to age- and sex-dependent differences in choline requirements (14), there is also a differential susceptibility to choline deficiency that is based on menopausal status. Premenopausal women are less likely to develop hepatic steatosis or an elevation of their aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase than either men or postmenopausal women (19). This differential response has been hypothesized to arise from an estrogen-response element in the upstream region of the PEMT gene, which is an enzyme in one of the choline biosynthetic pathways (20). Genome-association studies have demonstrated susceptibility to choline deficiency with single nucleotide polymorphisms in this gene (2022). It has also been shown that PEMT gene expression and enzyme activity are inducible on estrogen exposure in mouse and human hepatocytes (23).

Given the histologic overlap between choline deficiency–associated steatohepatitis and NASH, we hypothesized that individuals with a limited intake of choline may demonstrate more severe histologic changes.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects

Subjects were enrolled in one of following 3 studies of the NASH CRN (24): 1) the NAFLD Database (observational cohort) (25), 2) the randomized, placebo control trial for Pioglitazone vs Vitamin E vs Placebo for Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00063622) (26, 27), and 3) the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children (www.clinicaltrials.gov; clinical trial number NCT00063635) (28, 29). See Table 1 under “Supplemental data” in the online issue for a summary of patient selection and inclusion and exclusion criteria. The NASH CRN consists of 8 clinical centers and a central data coordinating center. Laboratory studies were drawn within 6 mo of screening, and biopsies were obtained within 1 y of screening. Patients enrolled with baseline data on diet composition (detailed in “Dietary intake” below) within 180 d of a liver biopsy were included. Subjects with significant alcohol consumption (>20 g/d for women and >30 g/d for men, either currently or for a period of >3 consecutive months in the 5 y before screening) or who were unable to reliably quantify alcohol intake were excluded.

TABLE 1.

Adequate intake for choline as defined in reference 141

Age Males Females
mg choline/d
9–13 y 375 375
14–18 y 550 400
≥19 y 550 425
1

Table includes ages for subjects in the current study only.

Ethics

All study protocols were approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers. All participants provided written informed consent and assent, if applicable.

Patient baseline data and histology

Baseline data regarding demographics, anthropometric measures, and laboratory data were obtained as previously described (30). Postmenopausal patients were self-identified as part of the entry questionnaire. Liver biopsies were centrally read, and consensus was scored with the NASH CRN scoring system (31). Enrollment liver biopsies from patients enrolled in the Pioglitazone vs Vitamin E vs Placebo for Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children trials were used (pretreatment).

Dietary intake

Dietary data were collected with the Block Food Questionnaire (adults) or Brief Food Questionnaire (children) (NutritionQuest) (3236), which are recall-based food inventories regarding eating habits over the past year. The questionnaires were completed at enrollment and analyzed with NutritionQuest proprietary software (NutritionQuest) to provide daily intakes of choline and betaine in milligrams per day. Choline and betaine contents of specific foods that were used to score the food-frequency questionnaire were obtained from the USDA Database for the Choline Content of Common Foods, Release 2 (37). An additional analysis was performed to provide daily intake of calories, carbohydrates, protein, fat, vitamin B-12, and folate.

Statistics

Participants were divided into categories corresponding to the Institute of Medicine's definition of AI for choline (Table 1). Deficient intake was defined as intake less than one-half of the AI (14) for each group as follows: children 9–13 y old (<188 mg/d), males ≥14 y old (<275 mg/d), adolescent females 14–18 y old (<200 mg/d), and women ≥19 y old (<212 mg/d). Children <9 y old (n = 13) and adolescent females 14–18 y old (n = 18) were excluded because of insufficient numbers. Because postmenopausal women are more likely to develop fatty liver with choline deprivation (19), adult women were subdivided into premenopausal and postmenopausal categories. For analyses, patients were classified as Hispanic (any race), white (non-Hispanic), or other. Correlations for measured variables were calculated by Spearman's rank correlation. P values were calculated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables and the t test for Spearman's rank correlation for measured variables. Multiple ordinal logistic regression models in which known contributors to NAFLD and NASH were controlled for were constructed to compare the calculated daily choline intake to the steatosis grade and fibrosis stage. Steatosis was categorized as <34%, 34–66%, >66% of low- to medium-power evaluation of parenchymal involvement by steatosis, consistent with the NAFLD histology scoring system. Fibrosis was categorized into 4 groups on the basis of NAFLD histology scoring as follows: stage 0; stages 1a, 1b, and 1c combined; stage 2; and stages 3 and 4 combined. For children, age, race (white, Hispanic, or other), BMI z score, triglyceride concentration (split at the median), Hb A1c (split at the median), daily caloric intake (split at the median), and HOMA-IR >3.5 (mg · dL−1 · μU · mL−1 · 405−1) (yes compared with no) were adjusted for in regression analyses. For all other groups, age, race (white, Hispanic, or other), BMI (in kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), triglyceride concentration (split at the median), Hb A1c (split at the median), daily caloric intake (split at the median), HOMA-IR >3.5 (mg · dL−1 · μU · mL−1 · 405−1) (yes compared with no), alcohol use, and steroid use were adjusted for in regression analyses. Total caloric intake was also adjusted for in both models for decreased overall intake. The proportional odds assumption for multiple ordinal logistic regression models was assessed by using the score test. Because the score test showed a violation of the assumption in one model, additional analyses were conducted by using the Brant test to assess the proportional odds for individual variables. The primary variable of interest (ie, daily choline intake) was shown to meet the assumption.

Because choline deficiency may be unmasked in a folate-sufficient/B-12–deficient state because of interactions between the pathways for choline, vitamin B-12, and folate metabolism (38, 39), reported B-12 and folate intakes calculated from the dietary questionnaire were included as a separate variable in the multiple logistic regression along with an interaction variable between the included vitamins and choline. For postmenopausal women, a second model with HRT adjusted for was performed in addition to the previously mentioned parameters.

All statistical analyses were performed with SAS for Windows (version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc) and STATA (version 10; StataCorp).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

Six hundred sixty-four patients were included in this study. Baseline characteristics are listed in Table 2. Whites composed the greatest percentage of each group (66% males ≥14 y old; 70% premenopausal women ≥19 y old; 83% postmenopausal women), except for children ≤13 y old, of whom the majority were self-classified as Hispanic (59%). The proportion of subjects in the steatosis and fibrosis categories was analyzed by race-ethnicity, and there was no difference in the distribution by using Fisher's exact test except in the fibrosis categories for males ≥14 y old. The median BMI for all adult and adolescent groups was classified as obese, whereas for children, the median BMI z score was >2 SDs above the mean. The median choline intake was below AI concentrations for all groups as follows: 292 mg/d for children ≤13 y old (compared with 375 mg/d AI), 308 mg/d for males ≥14 y old (compared with 550 mg/d AI), 257 mg/d for premenopausal women ≥19 y old (compared with 425 mg/d AI), and 262 mg/d for postmenopausal women (compared with 425 mg/d AI). The median reported intakes of vitamin B-12 and folate were greater than the Recommended Daily Allowance for all groups. The percentage of participants who had any alcohol intake (but less than the cutoff for study eligibility, as previously described) was highest in premenopausal women ≥19 y old (56%), followed by in males ≥14 y old (50%), postmenopausal women (47%), and children ≤13 y old (0%). The daily caloric intake was lowest in postmenopausal women (1562 calories), followed by in premenopausal women (1576 calories), children (1789 calories), and males (1903 calories), with daily intakes of protein that followed a similarly ranked order as follows: postmenopausal women: 58.5 g; premenopausal women: 61.7 g; children: 71.9 g; and males: 75.8 g. Carbohydrate intake followed a different pattern, with the most carbohydrates consumed by children (234 g) followed by males (227 g), premenopausal women (193 g), and postmenopausal women (187 g). The daily fat intake was highest in males (80 g), whereas children and pre- and postmenopausal women all consumed approximately equal amounts of daily fat (∼66 g).

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of subjects1

Children 9–13 y old (n = 114) Males ≥14 y old (n = 240) Premenopausal women ≥19 y old (n = 116) Postmenopausal women (n = 194)
Demographic characteristics
 Age (y) 12 (11, 13)2 39 (26.5, 52) 41 (32, 46) 57 (52, 61)
 Race [n (%)]
  White 39 (34.5) 158 (66.1) 81 (69.8) 161 (83.0)
  Black 1 (0.9) 2 (0.8) 1 (0.9) 6 (3.1)
  Hispanic 67 (59.3) 50 (20.9) 30 (25.9) 15 (7.7)
  Asian/Pacific Islander 1 (0.9) 20 (8.4) 1 (0.9) 5 (2.6)
  American Indian/Alaska Native 2 (1.8) 1 (0.4) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.5)
  More than one race 3 (2.7) 8 (3.4) 2 (1.7) 6 (3.1)
Laboratory/measured values
 ALT (U/L) 83 (63, 138) 77 (57, 109) 59 (37, 105) 56.5 (39, 88)
 AST (U/L) 53 (39, 76) 44 (34, 64) 46 (32, 73) 47 (32, 70)
 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 115 (90, 160) 152 (108, 218) 150 (97, 193) 141 (105, 201)
 BMI (kg/m2) NA 33.4 (29.8, 36.8) 36.6 (31.3, 42.0) 33.6 (29.3, 38.4)
 BMI z score 2.4 (2.1, 2.5) NA NA NA
History of corticosteroid use [n (%)] 4 (3.5) 19 (7.9) 12 (10.3) 24 (12.4)
Estimated daily intakes
 Calories 1789 (1258, 2370) 1903 (1466, 2670) 1576 (1182, 2158) 1562 (1054, 2130)
 Protein (g) 71.9 (50.4, 96.3) 75.8 (52.8, 98.4) 61.7 (41.3, 84.2) 58.5 (41.5, 83.4)
 Carbohydrate (g) 234 (153, 314) 227 (172, 317) 193 (124, 259) 187 (134, 253)
 Fat (g) 66 (43.8, 98.3) 80.4 (55.2, 118) 65.3 (49.4, 90.1) 66 (41.3, 91.8)
 Choline (mg) 292 (218, 402) 308 (221, 407) 257 (189, 325) 262 (176, 373)
 Vitamin B-12 (μg) 4.5 (2.9, 7.5) 5.0 (3.2, 9.0) 4.9 (2.5, 8.0) 6.4 (2.9, 9.8)
 Folate (μg) 415.9 (274, 564) 420 (292, 686) 387 (260, 663) 450 (312, 777)
 Any alcohol use [n (%)] 0 (0.0) 121 (50.4) 65 (56.0) 91 (46.9)
1

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; NA, not applicable.

2

Median; 25th, 75th percentiles in parentheses (all such values).

Details of biopsy histologies of participants are shown in Table 3. The greatest percentage of high-grade (>66%) steatosis was seen in children (42%) compared with in only 26% of males ≥14 y old, 32% of premenopausal women ≥19 y old, and 24% of postmenopausal women. Most participants showed little lobular inflammation, but fibrosis was common; 79% of postmenopausal women had fibrosis as did 76% of children ≤13 y old, 67% of males ≥14 y old, and 70% of premenopausal women ≥19 y old. Cirrhosis was shown in 12% of postmenopausal women, whereas only 0.9% of children ≤13 y old, 5% of males ≥14 y old, and 1.7% of premenopausal women ≥19 y old had cirrhosis.

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of biopsy specimens

Children 9–13 y old (n = 114) Males ≥14 y old (n = 240) Premenopausal women ≥19 y old (n = 116) Postmenopausal women (n = 194)
Steatosis grade [n (%)]
 <5% 2 (1.8) 10 (4.2) 4 (3.5) 9 (4.6)
 5–33% 26 (22.8) 85 (35.4) 36 (31.0) 78 (40.2)
 >33–66% 38 (33.3) 83 (34.6) 39 (33.6) 61 (31.4)
 >66% 48 (42.1) 62 (25.8) 37 (31.9) 46 (23.7)
Lobular inflammation [n (%)]
 <2, <20× magnification 58 (50.9) 132 (55.0) 54 (46.6) 94 (48.5)
 2–4, <20× magnification 53 (46.5) 93 (38.8) 43 (37.1) 77 (39.7)
 >4, <20× magnification 3 (2.6) 15 (6.3) 19 (16.4) 23 (11.9)
Ballooning [n (%)]
 None 51 (44.7) 93 (38.8) 33 (28.5) 52 (26.8)
 Few 39 (34.2) 83 (34.6) 32 (27.6) 45 (23.2)
 Many 24 (21.1) 64 (26.7) 51 (44.0) 97 (50.0)
NAFLD1 activity score [n (%)]
 1 1 (0.9) 4 (1.7) 1 (0.9) 3 (1.6)
 2 7 (6.1) 32 (13.3) 12 (10.3) 23 (11.9)
 3 23 (20.2) 47 (19.6) 21 (18.1) 22 (11.3)
 4 29 (25.4) 56 (23.3) 16 (13.8) 41 (21.1)
 5 27 (23.7) 52 (21.7) 24 (20.7) 45 (23.2)
 6 18 (15.8) 28 (11.7) 17 (14.7) 36 (18.6)
 7 9 (7.9) 18 (7.5) 18 (15.5) 18 (9.3)
 8 0 (0.0) 3 (1.3) 7 (6.0) 6 (3.1)
Fibrosis stage [n (%)]
 0 (none) 27 (23.9) 78 (32.5) 34 (29.6) 40 (20.7)
 1a (mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal) 7 (6.2) 42 (17.5) 19 (16.5) 20 (10.4)
 1b (moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal) 1 (0.9) 26 (10.8) 18 (15.7) 20 (10.4)
 1c (portal/periportal only) 38 (33.6) 9 (3.8) 3 (2.6) 5 (2.6)
 2 (zone 3 and periportal, any combination) 22 (19.5) 45 (18.0.8) 26 (22.6) 38 (19.7)
 3 (bridging) 17 (15.0) 28 (11.7) 13 (11.3) 46 (23.8)
 4 (cirrhosis) 1 (0.9) 12 (5.0) 2 (1.7) 24 (12.4)
1

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Correlation with reported choline intake

Associations of baseline data and histology with choline intake are detailed in Tables 4 and 5. Choline intake, which was unadjusted for other variables, was not significantly associated with the NAFLD activity score, steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, or fibrosis in any group. Choline intake differed by race-ethnicity for children and males ≥14 y old. For males ≥14 y old, whites had the highest choline intake (327 mg/d) followed by subjects who were self-classified of more than one race (297 mg/d), Hispanic (277 mg/d), and other (230 mg/d) (P = 0.001). In children, subjects of more than one race consumed the most choline (716 mg/d), followed by Hispanic (311 mg/d), other (309 mg/d), and white (274 mg/d) races (P = 0.03). Choline intake for premenopausal women increased with BMI (P = 0.008; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.25). There was a significant correlation between choline intake and calories, protein, fat, and carbohydrates (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons in all groups).

TABLE 4.

Distribution of choline intake by selected categorical variables1

Choline intake
Children 9–13 y old P Males ≥14 y old P Premenopausal women ≥19 y old P Postmenopausal women P
mg/d mg/d mg/d mg/d
Demographic characteristics
Race 0.03 0.001 0.13 0.34
 White 274 (195, 402) 327 (259, 425) 262 (207, 338) 259 (178, 373)
 Hispanic 311 (236, 386) 277 (178, 338) 214 (141, 300) 266 (146, 319)
 Other 309 (158, 454) 230 (192, 349) 213 (145, 263) 282 (178, 342)
 More than one race 716 (589, 1026) 297 (245, 430) 239 (139, 338) 482 (223, 512)
Histology
 Steatosis (grade) 0.25 0.83 0.52 0.26
  <5% 293 (214, 371) 294 (212, 495) 199 (180, 223) 361 (273, 420)
  5–33% 355 (263, 420) 314 (226, 483) 260 (188, 341) 258 (172, 344)
  >33–66% 292 (198, 406) 305 (211, 388) 243 (195, 324) 249 (178, 338)
  >66% 286 (195, 392) 307 (223, 389) 273 (174, 338) 277 (223, 396)
 Lobular inflammation 0.27 0.66 0.18 0.20
 <2, <20× magnification 286 (198, 380) 308 (229, 447) 266 (207, 326) 278 (203, 404)
 2–4, <20× magnification 328 (235, 415) 308 (204, 387) 261 (174, 413) 249 (163, 347)
 >4, <20× magnification 354 (273, 577) 325 (205, 381) 206 (143, 308) 248 (175, 334)
 Ballooning 0.41 0.32 0.74 0.50
  None 291 (212, 383) 313 (227, 446) 261 (206, 322) 255 (186, 341)
  Few 288 (214, 420) 309 (243, 409) 260 (191, 372) 272 (147, 347)
  Many 358 (239, 467) 299 (205, 373) 239 (172, 310) 270 (183, 393)
 NAFLD activity score 0.66 0.14 0.60 0.74
  1–2 326 (244, 384) 365 (281, 519) 236 (211, 312) 260 (208, 372)
  3 291 (238, 383) 313 (227, 387) 275 (203, 357) 252 (152, 340)
  4 275 (173, 380) 283 (204, 404) 270 (201, 427) 286 (205, 404)
  5 362 (222, 469) 296 (202, 364) 241 (183, 297) 268 (163, 329)
  6 299 (228, 398) 345 (263, 410) 285 (239, 320) 268 (179, 417)
  7 273 (195, 402) 333 (285, 373) 227 (146, 338) 252 (153, 388)
  8 NA 306 (205, 389) 203 (124, 373) 250 (234, 277)
 Fibrosis stage 0.38 0.66 0.34 0.50
  None 306 (182, 371) 308 (204, 448) 274 (205, 393) 260 (207, 360)
  Stage 1a, 1b, or 1c 286 (212, 406) 305 (243, 373) 276 (201, 330) 273 (178, 404)
  Zone 3 and periportal, any combination 346 (280, 502) 353 (226, 459) 231 (146, 324) 281 (208, 393)
  Bridging or cirrhosis 274 (230, 446) 306 (208, 368) 235 (179, 308) 249 (163, 357)
1

All values are medians; 25th, 75th percentiles in parentheses. P values were calculated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables. NA, not applicable; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

TABLE 5.

Correlation of measured variables with choline intake (mg/d)1

Children 9–13 y old
Males ≥14 y old
Premenopausal women ≥19 y old
Postmenopausal women
ρ P ρ P ρ P ρ P
ALT (U/L) 0.05 0.60 0.02 0.60 −0.01 0.60 0.08 0.60
AST (U/L) 0.03 0.75 0.02 0.78 −0.11 0.25 0.03 0.71
BMI z score 0.12 0.21 NA NA NA
BMI (kg/m2) NA 0.12 0.07 0.25 0.008 0.11 0.12
Total (calories/d) 0.87 <0.0001 0.86 <0.0001 0.84 <0.0001 0.87 <0.0001
Protein (g/d) 0.94 <0.0001 0.91 <0.0001 0.93 <0.0001 0.94 <0.0001
Carbohydrates (g/d) 0.78 <0.0001 0.68 <0.0001 0.70 <0.0001 0.78 <0.0001
Fat (g/d) 0.81 <0.0001 0.86 <0.0001 0.79 <0.0001 0.78 <0.0001
1

P values calculated using the t test for Spearman's rank correlation. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; NA, not applicable; ρ, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Ordinal logistic regression

The breakdown of subjects in each of the age and menopausal status groups into fibrosis and steatosis categories by reported choline-intake status is detailed in Table 6. These data were analyzed by using ordinal logistic regression models constructed to account for known contributors to the development of NASH/NAFLD including age, race-ethnicity, obesity (especially central obesity) hypertriglyceridemia, diabetes and insulin resistance, daily caloric intake, alcohol use, and steroid use. Results are summarized in Table 7. Subjects with deficient reported choline intakes did not have worse steatosis in any analysis group. The analysis of fibrosis stage showed that postmenopausal women with a reported choline intake less than one-half the defined AI had more significant fibrosis after known contributors to NASH/NAFLD were controlled for (P = 0.002). To further investigate the association between reported choline intakes and fibrosis stages in postmenopausal women, additional ordinal logistic regression models were constructed that contained only the reported choline intake and one other term. The model that used Hb A1c had the most significant P value (P = 0.008). Other terms leading to significant P values were BMI (P = 0.03), HOMA-IR (P = 0.03), and waist circumference (P = 0.03).

TABLE 6.

Steatosis grade and fibrosis stage by reported dietary choline intake in different age and menopausal status groups1

Steatosis grade
Fibrosis stage
Choline intake n <34% 34–66% >66% P n2 0 1a, 1b, or 1c 2 3 or 4 P
n (%) n (%)
Children 9–13 y old 0.05 0.44
 <188 mg/d 20 1 (5.0) 9 (45.0) 10 (50.0) 20 7 (35.0) 9 (45.0) 2 (10.0) 2 (10.0)
 ≥188 mg/d 94 27 (28.7) 29 (30.9) 38 (40.4) 93 20 (21.5) 37 (39.8) 20 (21.5) 16 (17.2)
Males ≥14 y old 0.74 0.92
 <275 mg/d 87 35 (40.2) 32 (36.8) 20 (23.0) 87 29 (33.3) 27 (31.0) 15 (17.2) 16 (18.4)
 ≥275 mg/d 153 60 (39.2) 51 (33.3) 42 (27.5) 153 49 (32.0) 50 (32.7) 30 (19.6) 24 (15.7)
Premenopausal women ≥19 y old 0.94 0.49
 <212 mg/d 39 13 (33.3) 14 (35.9) 12 (30.8) 38 9 (23.7) 12 (31.6) 10 (26.3) 7 (18.4)
 ≥212 mg/d 77 27 (35.1) 25 (32.5) 25 (32.5) 77 25 (32.5) 28 (36.4) 16 (20.8) 8 (10.4)
Postmenopausal women 0.25 0.17
 <212 mg/d 63 28 (44.4) 24 (38.1) 11 (17.5) 63 11 (17.5) 12 (19.1) 10 (15.9) 30 (47.6)
 ≥212 mg/d 131 59 (45.0) 37 (28.2) 35 (26.7) 130 29 (22.3) 33 (25.4) 28 (21.5) 40 (30.8)
1

P values were calculated by using the Fisher's exact test.

2

Three subjects did not have a fibrosis score recorded.

TABLE 7.

Relation between dietary choline and levels of steatosis and fibrosis1

Steatosis2
Fibrosis3
Values P Values P
Children 9–13 y old4 1.20 (0.37, 3.90) 0.76 0.64 (0.20, 2.04) 0.45
Males ≥14 y old5 0.68 (0.33, 1.38) 0.28 1.89 (0.94, 3.79) 0.07
Premenopausal women ≥19 y old5 1.57 (0.61, 4.06) 0.35 2.55 (1.00, 6.48) 0.05
Postmenopausal women5 0.88 (0.42, 1.86) 0.74 3.37 (1.58, 7.19) 0.002
1

All values are cumulative ORs; 95% CIs in parentheses. The cumulative OR of worse steatosis or fibrosis associated with a deficient daily choline intake (less than one-half the defined ADI) was assessed by using an ordinal logistic regression model with known contributors to NAFLD and NASH controlled for. ORs and P values were derived from multiple ordinal logistic regression models. Dietary choline was analyzed as a dichotomous variable, whereby choline values less than the deficient intake concentration were compared with values greater than or equal to deficient intake. Values of deficient choline intake are specific to each group. ADI, adequate dietary intake; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

2

Defined as <34%, 34–66%, and >66%.

3

Defined as stage 0; stages 1a, 1b, and 1c combined; stage 2; and stages 3 and 4 combined.

4

Age, race (white, Hispanic, or other), BMI z score, triglyceride concentration, hemoglobin A1c, and daily caloric intake split at the median, and HOMA-IR >3.5 (mg · dL−1 · μU · mL−1 · 405−1) (yes compared with no) were controlled for.

5

Age, race (white, Hispanic, or other), BMI (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), triglyceride concentration, hemoglobin A1c and daily caloric intake split at the median, HOMA-IR >3.5 (mg · dL−1 · μU · mL−1 · 405−1) (yes compared with no), alcohol use (yes compared with no), and steroid use (yes compared with no) were controlled for.

Additional ordinal logistic regression models were constructed with adjustment for vitamin B-12 and folate intakes. These models included an interaction term for choline and either vitamin B-12 or folate. No significant change in any association was shown by including these additional vitamins, and none of the interaction terms reached significance. Similarly, given the association with estrogen status and susceptibility to choline deficiency, an additional model that incorporated HRT was constructed for the postmenopausal group. The number of postmenopausal women who took any kind of HRT was 27% (53 of 194 women). The association of worse fibrosis with decreased choline intake was not affected by the inclusion of this term.

DISCUSSION

NASH is the major cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis (40). The process is likely multifactorial but has known associations with obesity (4145), insulin resistance (26, 4648), and hyperlipidemia (4951). Given these associations, a nutritional contribution to the development of NAFLD and NASH has attracted significant attention with multiple micronutrients that showed an association (52, 53). We sought to determine whether an association exists between choline intake and histologic severity of NAFLD or NASH. Remarkably, we showed that postmenopausal women with NASH and a daily calculated choline intake less than one-half the defined AI exhibited worse fibrosis. Choline was previously thought to be nonessential; however, it is now known that healthy humans are unable to synthesize enough choline de novo to prevent deficiency (16). In addition, patients on long-term parenteral nutrition with steatohepatitis who are choline deficient show reversal of steatohepatitis with supplementation of choline (17, 18). Also, individuals with specific polymorphisms in genes involved in the choline pathway have altered susceptibility to choline deficiency (20, 54); subjects with V175M substitution in the PEMT protein, which is an enzyme in one of the choline biosynthetic pathways, show increased susceptibility to develop NAFLD, commonly without obesity (55). Of note, the promoter region of the PEMT gene contains a polymorphism that increased susceptibility to choline deficiency in postmenopausal women (20) who, then, were vulnerable to develop fatty liver when placed on a severely choline deficient diet (<10% AI) in clinical trials (19). The current study considered intakes <50% AI deficient. Although it did not reach statistical significance, we showed the same trend in both premenopausal women and men. These findings, coupled with the results of clinical trials, may suggest that men have additional mechanisms of upregulating genes in the choline synthesis pathway that are able to compensate for moderate deficiencies but not severe deficiencies. Other genes, including PNPLA3, also appear to play an important role in the development of NAFLD and have been shown to be associated with both increased hepatic fat amounts and fibrosis (56, 57).

Although we expected to see an increase in steatosis with decreased choline intakes, the relative lack of steatosis suggested that other contributing factors outweigh choline deficiency for deposition of fat, the progression to fibrosis is faster in a choline-deficient state (and, thus, the stage that shows increased steatosis is missed by the biopsy protocol used in these studies), or dietary choline deficiency only plays a role in advanced stages of liver disease accompanied by an impaired ability to synthesize choline, because cirrhotic patients have decreased ability to synthesize choline de novo (58). A fourth possibility is that patients enrolled in the studies already had histologic evidence of NAFLD or NASH, or, at the very least, a strong suspicion of either. In this population, the disease stage at which steatosis is hypothesized to be hastened by choline deficiency may have already passed, or alternatively, some threshold level of choline deficiency may cause steatosis, but more severe deficiency may not cause additional increases in steatosis.

Our study was limited by its cross-sectional nature. We obtained a dietary history only at enrollment in the study, and dietary choline intake was not validated by plasma concentrations. The dietary history was recall based and required participants to select from a predefined list of foods with an estimated frequency of intake. The recall-based nature may have led to an underestimation of intakes. For example, the total caloric intake for adults in the study averaged <2000 calories/d, whereas BMI was >33. Furthermore, the preprinted list of foods may not have captured the dietary subtleties of ethnic diets of some subjects. Last, we did not genotypes these subjects. The variation in genes known to affect the choline synthesis pathway may more specifically identify individuals susceptible to choline deficiency or for whom choline supplementation may have a beneficial effect (2022, 5457).

A previous study in 47 patients did not find a correlation between plasma choline concentration and the severity of liver damage in NASH (59). Because NASH is the presumed end result of multiple pathways with behavioral, environmental, and genetic contributions, choline deficiency may play a role in only a subset of patients with NAFLD or NASH. Pure choline deficiency may only become apparent in an appropriately selected phenotypic subset of NASH patients, such as in postmenopausal women who may be unable to upregulate genes in the choline synthesis pathway that have estrogen-response elements in their promoters (23).

In conclusion, decreased choline intake is associated with worse fibrosis in a subset of patients with NASH. Additional study is needed to determine whether a reported low choline intake is associated with low plasma choline concentrations and if low choline concentrations are associated with the initiation or progression of NAFLD or NASH.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

Members of the NASH CRN are as follows: Clinical Centers—Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (Stephanie H Abrams and Leanel Angeli Fairly); Case Western Reserve University Clinical Centers: MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH [Arthur J McCullough, Patricia Brandt, Diane Bringman (2004–2008), Srinivasan Dasarathy, Jaividhya Dasarathy, Carol Hawkins, Yao-Chang Liu (2004–2009), Nicholette Rogers (2004–2008), and Margaret Stager (2004–2009)] and Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (Arthur J McCullough, Srinivasan Dasarathy, Mangesh Pagadala, Ruth Sargent, Lisa Yerian, and Claudia Zein); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA (Raphael Merriman and Anthony Nguyen); Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC (Parvathi Mohan and Kavita Nair); Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH (Stephanie DeVore, Rohit Kohli, Kathleen Lake, and Stavra Xanthakos); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC [Manal F Abdelmalek, Stephanie Buie, Anna Mae Diehl, Marcia Gottfried (2004–2008), Cynthia Guy, Meryt Hanna, Paul Killenberg (2004–2008), Samantha Kwan (2006–2009), Yi-Ping Pan, Dawn Piercy, and Melissa Smith]; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN (Elizabeth Byam, Naga Chalasani, Oscar W Cummings, Ann Klipsch, Jean P Molleston, Linda Ragozzino, Girish Subbarao, and Raj Vuppalanchi); Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Kimberly Pfeifer, Ann Scheimann, and Michael Torbenson); Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY (Nanda Kerkar, Sreevidya Narayanappa, and Frederick Suchy); Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine/Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL (Mark H Fishbein, Katie Jacques, Ann Quinn, Cindy Riazi, and Peter F Whitington); Seattle Children's Hospital & Research Institute, Seattle, WA (Karen F Murray and Melissa Young); Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO [Sarah Barlow (2002–2007), Jose Derdoy, Joyce Hoffmann, Debra King, Andrea Morris, Joan Siegner, Susan Stewart, Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri, and Judy Thompson]; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA [Cynthia Behling, Janis Durelle, Tarek Hassanein (2004–2009), Joel E Lavine, Rohit Loomba, Anya Morgan, Steven Rose (2007–2009), Heather Patton, Jeffrey B Schwimmer, Claude Sirlin, and Tanya Stein (2005–2009)]; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA [Bradley Aouizerat, Kiran Bambha (2006–2010), Nathan M Bass, Linda D Ferrell, Danuta Filipowski, Bo Gu (2009–2010), Raphael Merriman (2002–2007), Mark Pabst, Monique Rosenthal (2005–2010), Philip Rosenthal, and Tessa Steel (2006–2008)]; University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA (Matthew Yeh); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA [Sherry Boyett, Melissa J Contos, Michael Fuchs, Amy Jones, Velimir AC Luketic, Puneet Puri, Bimalijit Sandhu (2007–2009), Arun J Sanyal, Carol Sargeant, Kimberly Noble, and Melanie White (2006–2009)]; Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA (original grant with the University of Washington) (Kris V Kowdley, Jody Mooney, James Nelson, Sarah Ackermann, Cheryl Shaw, Vy Trinh, and Chia Wang); and Washington University, St Louis, MO (Elizabeth M Brunt). Resource Centers—National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (David E Kleiner); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (Gilman D Grave); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD [Edward C Doo, Jay H Hoofnagle, and Patricia R Robuck (project scientist)]; and Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health (data coordinating center), Baltimore, MD [Patricia Belt, Frederick L Brancati (2003–2009), Jeanne M Clark, Ryan Colvin, Michele Donithan, Mika Green, Rosemary Hollick (2003–2005), Milana Isaacson, Wana Jin, Alison Lydecker (2006–2008), Pamela Mann (2008–2009), Laura Miriel, Alice Sternberg, James Tonascia, Aynur Ünalp-Arida, Mark Van Natta, Ivana Vaughn, Laura Wilson, and Katherine Yates].

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—ALG and AOS: designed the research; ALG and AKS: conducted the research; RMC and ALG: analyzed data; AOS: had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; and all authors: wrote the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.

Footnotes

4

Abbreviations used: AI, adequate intake; Hb A1c, hemoglobin A1c; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NASH CRN, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobbs HH. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology 2004;40:1387–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim WR, Brown RS, Jr, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology 2002;36:227–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Falck-Ytter Y, Younossi ZM, Marchesini G, McCullough AJ. Clinical features and natural history of nonalcoholic steatosis syndromes. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21:17–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chitturi S, Farrell GC. Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21:27–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roskams T, Yang SQ, Koteish A, Durnez A, DeVos R, Huang X, Achten R, Verslype C, Diehl AM. Oxidative stress and oval cell accumulation in mice and humans with alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Pathol 2003;163:1301–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eastin CE, McClain CJ, Lee EY, Bagby GJ, Chawla RK. Choline deficiency augments and antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha attenuates endotoxin-induced hepatic injury. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997;21:1037–41 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirsch R, Clarkson V, Shephard EG, Marais DA, Jaffer MA, Woodburne VE, Kirsch RE, Hall Pde L. Rodent nutritional model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: species, strain and sex difference studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:1272–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koteish A, Diehl AM. Animal models of steatosis. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21:89–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Larter CZ, Yeh MM. Animal models of NASH: getting both pathology and metabolic context right. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;23:1635–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Newberne PM, Rogers AE. Labile methyl groups and the promotion of cancer. Annu Rev Nutr 1986;6:407–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salmon WD, Copeland DH. Liver carcinoma and related lesions in chronic choline deficiency. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1954;57:665–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teramoto K, Bowers JL, Khettry U, Palombo JD, Clouse ME. A rat fatty liver transplant model. Transplantation 1993;55:737–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zeisel SH. Choline: an important nutrient in brain development, liver function and carcinogenesis. J Am Coll Nutr 1992;11:473–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline: a report of the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes and its Panel on Folate, Other B Vitamins and Choline and Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998. [PubMed]
  • 15.Zeisel SH, Blusztajn JK. Choline and human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 1994;14:269–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeisel SH, Da Costa KA, Franklin PD, Alexander EA, Lamont JT, Sheard NF, Beiser A. Choline, an essential nutrient for humans. FASEB J 1991;5:2093–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Buchman AL, Dubin MD, Moukarzel AA, Jenden DJ, Roch M, Rice KM, Gornbein J, Ament ME. Choline deficiency: a cause of hepatic steatosis during parenteral nutrition that can be reversed with intravenous choline supplementation. Hepatology 1995;22:1399–403 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buchman AL, Ament ME, Sohel M, Dubin M, Jenden DJ, Roch M, Pownall H, Farley W, Awal M, Ahn C. Choline deficiency causes reversible hepatic abnormalities in patients receiving parenteral nutrition: proof of a human choline requirement: a placebo-controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2001;25:260–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fischer LM, daCosta KA, Kwock L, Stewart PW, Lu TS, Stabler SP, Allen RH, Zeisel SH. Sex and menopausal status influence human dietary requirements for the nutrient choline. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:1275–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.da Costa KA, Kozyreva OG, Song J, Galanko JA, Fischer LM, Zeisel SH. Common genetic polymorphisms affect the human requirement for the nutrient choline. FASEB J 2006;20:1336–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dong H, Wang J, Li C, Hirose A, Nozaki Y, Takahashi M, Ono M, Akisawa N, Iwasaki S, Saibara T, et al. The phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene V175M single nucleotide polymorphism confers the susceptibility to NASH in Japanese population. J Hepatol 2007;46:915–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Resseguie ME, da Costa KA, Galanko JA, Patel M, Davis IJ, Zeisel SH. Aberrant estrogen regulation of PEMT results in choline deficiency-associated liver dysfunction. J Biol Chem 2011;286:1649–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Resseguie M, Song J, Niculescu MD, da Costa KA, Randall TA, Zeisel SH. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) gene expression is induced by estrogen in human and mouse primary hepatocytes. FASEB J 2007;21:2622–32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network Hepatology 2003;37:244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Clark JM, Bass NM, Van Natta ML, Unalp-Arida A, Tonascia J, Zein CO, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, McCullough AJ, et al. Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010;52:913–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Choudhury J, Sanyal AJ. Insulin resistance and the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2004;8:575–94, ix [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chalasani NP, Sanyal AJ, Kowdley KV, Robuck PR, Hoofnagle J, Kleiner DE, Unalp A, Tonascia J. Pioglitazone versus vitamin E versus placebo for the treatment of non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: PIVENS trial design. Contemp Clin Trials 2009;30:88–96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Molleston JP, Scheimann AO, Murray KF, Abrams SH, Rosenthal P, Sanyal AJ, Robuck PR, Brunt EM, et al. Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: TONIC trial design. Contemp Clin Trials 2010;31:62–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Van Natta ML, Molleston JP, Murray KF, Rosenthal P, Abrams SH, Scheimann AO, Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, et al. Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2011;305:1659–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Patton HM, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Schwimmer JB, Kleiner D, Molleston J; Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network Clinical correlates of histopathology in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1961–71e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, Ferrell LD, Liu YC, Torbenson MS, Unalp-Arida A, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005;41:1313–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Block G, Coyle LM, Hartman AM, Scoppa SM. Revision of dietary analysis software for the Health Habits and History Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:1190–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:453–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:1327–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mares-Perlman JA, Klein BE, Klein R, Ritter LL, Fisher MR, Freudenheim JL. A diet history questionnaire ranks nutrient intakes in middle-aged and older men and women similarly to multiple food records. J Nutr 1993;123:489–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Block G, Hartman AM, Naughton D. A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation. Epidemiology 1990;1:58–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patterson KY, Bhagwat SA, Williams JR, Howe JC, Holden JM, Zeisel SH, Dacosta KA, Mar MH. USDA database of the choline content of common foods, Release 2. 2008. Available from: http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=6232. (cited 6 June 2011)
  • 38.Compher CW, Kinosian BP, Stoner NE, Lentine DC, Buzby GP. Choline and vitamin B12 deficiencies are interrelated in folate-replete long-term total parenteral nutrition patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002;26:57–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim YI, Miller JW, da Costa KA, Nadeau M, Smith D, Selhub J, Zeisel SH, Mason JB. Severe folate deficiency causes secondary depletion of choline and phosphocholine in rat liver. J Nutr 1994;124:2197–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, Hespenheide EE, Battle EH, Driscoll CJ. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology 1999;29:664–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dixon JB, Bhathal PS, O'Brien PE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology 2001;121:91–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Haynes P, Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in individuals with severe obesity. Clin Liver Dis 2004;8:535–47, viii [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liver Dis 2008;28:339–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marchesini G, Moscatiello S, Di Domizio S, Forlani G. Obesity-associated liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(suppl 1):S74–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nair S, Cope K, Risby TH, Diehl AM. Obesity and female gender increase breath ethanol concentration: potential implications for the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1200–4 (Published erratum appears in Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2809.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Diehl AM, Clarke J, Brancati F. Insulin resistance syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Endocr Pract 2003;9(suppl 2):93–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Bugianesi E, Lenzi M, McCullough AJ, Natale S, Forlani G, Melchionda N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 2001;50:1844–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Rauch JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Lavine JE. Obesity, insulin resistance, and other clinicopathological correlates of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr 2003;143:500–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, Angulo P. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 2005;129:113–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 2005;115:1343–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parekh S, Anania FA. Abnormal lipid and glucose metabolism in obesity: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2191–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Solga S, Alkhuraishe AR, Clark JM, Torbenson M, Greenwald A, Diehl AM, Magnuson T. Dietary composition and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49:1578–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Edmison J, McCullough AJ. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: human data. Clin Liver Dis 2007;11:75–104, ix [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kohlmeier M, da Costa KA, Fischer LM, Zeisel SH. Genetic variation of folate-mediated one-carbon transfer pathway predicts susceptibility to choline deficiency in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:16025–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Song J, da Costa KA, Fischer LM, Kohlmeier M, Kwock L, Wang S, Zeisel SH. Polymorphism of the PEMT gene and susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). FASEB J 2005;19:1266–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, Pertsemlidis A, Cox D, Pennacchio LA, Boerwinkle E, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet 2008;40:1461–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Speliotes EK, Butler JL, Palmer CD, Voight BF, Hirschhorn JN. PNPLA3 variants specifically confer increased risk for histologic nonalcoholic fatty liver disease but not metabolic disease. Hepatology 2010;52:904–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chawla RK, Wolf DC, Kutner MH, Bonkovsky HL. Choline may be an essential nutrient in malnourished patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1989;97:1514–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nehra V, Angulo P, Buchman AL, Lindor KD. Nutritional and metabolic considerations in the etiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:2347–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data

Articles from The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES