Abstract
Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsy of mediastinal and pulmonary lesions is a minimally invasive approach for obtaining tissue for histopathological examination. Although it is a widely accepted procedure with relatively few complications, precise planning and detailed knowledge of various aspects of the biopsy procedure is mandatory to avert complications. In this pictorial review, we reviewed important anatomical approaches, technical aspects of the procedure, and its associated complications.
Keywords: Biopsy, Computed tomography, Interventional radiology, Lung, Mediastinum, Pneumothorax
INTRODUCTION
Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsy (PCNB) of the intrathoracic lesions is a well-established technique for obtaining tissue for histopathological examination and various other tests (1, 2). Although this technique is less invasive as compared to the surgical biopsy, complications sometimes do occur. Due to the presence of the heart, major vessels, bones, and the lung parenchyma, the operator has to be well versed with the various anatomical and technical aspects of the biopsy procedure in order to minimize complications. In this article, we have tried to present various aspects of percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsy of mediastinal and lung lesions.
Prebiopsy Preparation
Several steps are taken in the preparation of each biopsy procedure (2, 3). Informed consent is obtained from the patient and the risks, benefits, and alternatives are discussed in detail. Any anticoagulant medication is discontinued at least 4-5 days before the procedure (2, 4). Although there have been no definite guidelines for PCNB in patients using an anti-platelet medication, some authors have recommended discontinuing aspirin at least 5 days before a biopsy is performed (3). A recent platelet count and complete coagulogram should be available before the procedure to exclude any coagulation abnormality. A good quality baseline contrast-enhanced CT should always be done and reviewed before the procedure for the lesion size, location, lesion vascularity, and important structures located in the biopsy path. The condition of the underlying lung is evaluated for the presence of emphysema and bullous lesions. A violent uncooperative patient is one of the major contraindications for PCNB. Other relative contraindications include bleeding diatheses, severe bullous emphysema, contralateral pneumonectomy, hydatid cyst, pulmonary hypertension and a highly vascular lesion (Fig. 1) (3, 4). If the patient has cough, cough suppressants should be prescribed.
Biopsy Procedure and Various Techniques for Lesion Targeting
Medication and Monitoring
Patent wide bore (18-20 G) intravenous access should be obtained and a facility for continuous pulse oximetry and vital monitoring should be available. Sedation is generally not desirable as it reduces the patient's level of cooperation. However, whenever sedation is necessary, 0.25 mg of alprazolam can be given orally or as an alternative, 1 mg of midazolam can be administered intravenously (4). The procedure is done under local anesthesia (1-2% lignocaine). While injecting the local anesthetic, care is taken not to advance needle tip into pleura or any vascular structure.
Choosing the Appropriate Biopsy Needle
Percutaneous biopsies consist of mainly two types: fine needle aspiration biopsy and cutting or core biopsy (2, 3). Fine needle aspiration biopsy is also known as fine needle aspiration cytology or fine needle aspiration. Aspiration needles are usually 20-25 gauge and provide material for cytological and microbiological examination (Fig. 2). Cutting or core biopsy needles provide small linear tissue sections suitable for histological evaluation. These needles are usually larger in caliber than aspiration needles; however, nowadays small caliber (18-20 gauge) automated cutting needles are available. The diagnostic accuracy of aspiration biopsy is almost as good as core biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant lesions, especially if an onsite cytopathologist is present. However, for the diagnosis of benign lesions and lymphoma, core biopsy is preferred (2, 3, 5). Although rates for pneumothorax are similar for aspiration needles and cutting biopsy needles, a slightly higher incidence of pulmonary bleeding is reported with cutting biopsy needles (2). Moreover, there is little evidence in the literature that needle gauge affects the complication rate within the size range of the smaller needles available for lung biopsy; needles larger than 18-gauge are considered a risk for causing both bleeding and pneumothorax (6). During the biopsy of mediastinal lesions, large-caliber needles should be avoided if the needle path traverses the lung parenchyma, when great vessels are located in proximity to the lesion, or if the lesion is highly vascular (5).
Both aspiration and core biopsies can be done either by using a single needle technique or a coaxial technique. In the single needle technique, a needle is directly advanced into the lesion and if multiple samples are required each time, a new pass will be made. Alternatively, a coaxial technique can be used, and involves the initial placement of an outer guiding needle close to the target, followed by the introduction of a thinner biopsy needle through it to sample the lesion (6). The disadvantage of the single needle technique is that each time the needle is introduced into the lesion; image guidance is required, resulting in increased procedure time. Moreover, intervening structures are traversed each time, resulting in increased risk of complication (5). While a coaxial technique offers many advantages, larger caliber guiding needles are required to puncture the pleura. In the presence of a prominent internal air-bronchogram or open-bronchus sign in the lesion, a coaxial technique should be used more carefully as there is an increased risk of air embolism.
To employ the coaxial technique during aspiration biopsy, an 18-gauge chiba needle can be used as the guide, followed by insertion of a longer length 20-22 gauge chiba needle (Fig. 2) (5). In our institute, we use the coaxial biopsy set containing a 16 or 19-gauge guiding needle with an 18 or 20-gauge biopsy needle, respectively for obtaining tissue cores (Quick core biopsy set, Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) (Fig. 3). Needle length should be selected depending on depth of lesion from the skin. In the quick core biopsy set available at our institution the outer guiding needle is 3-4 cm shorter than the inner biopsy needle and this is a very important point to be remembered during the needle selection. A quick core biopsy needle is available with two different lengths of specimen notch, 10 mm and 20 mm. A longer specimen notch is preferred as it gives more tissue; however, if the lesion is small, a short notch is used to avoid injury to the normal structures. One more advantage of quick core needle is that the specimen notch can be advanced into the lesion and the exact site of the biopsy can be ascertained prior to firing the biopsy needle.
After reviewing the previous images, a safe route to the lesion and an appropriate sized needle is chosen. Needle selection in any given case depends on a number of factors, including the size and location of the target lesion, intervening structures in the planned biopsy path, status of the underlying lung, experience of the radiologist, and the estimated amount of tissue needed for diagnosis. Due to the unavailability of an onsite cytopathologist, we prefer to use coaxial core biopsy needles and routinely obtain 2-3 tissue cores.
Patient Positioning
During a lung biopsy, the prone position is preferred as it allows the least chest wall motion with an added advantage of a comfortable "biopsy side down" post biopsy positioning of the patient (4). The supine position is associated with moderate chest wall motion, while the lateral decubitus position is associated with the maximum chest wall motion. However, patient positioning should be based mainly on lesion accessibility and the safest path to the lesion.
Breathing Instruction
Most upper lobe lung lesions can be targeted during gentle breathing and no special breathing instructions are required (3, 4). However, breath holding instructions are important during biopsy of lung lesions closer to diaphragm due to respiratory motion (Fig. 4) (3). Patients are explained to take small inspirations so that there may be minimal motion once a needle has passed through the pleura, as deeper inspiration will cause significant needle movement with greater chances of tearing the pleural surface (3, 6). Patients are instructed to hold their breath consistently (same degree of inspiration) each time during scanning or needle manipulation, so that the target lesion maintains a predictable position throughout the biopsy procedure (3). Sometimes, a patient may be asked to hold their breath differently to align the target lesion with the needle path. For example, during biopsy, the lesion has moved caudal to the needle path, and breath holding in expiration may help and vice versa (Fig. 5) (6). Although no definite breathing instructions have been described for the biopsy of mediastinal lesions, we have asked the patients for breath holding if we felt that with respiration the lesion could move or the lung may come in the path of the needle; otherwise, a biopsy was obtained in gentle breathing.
Use of Intravenous Contrast
For lesion localization, a non-enhanced CT alone is usually sufficient in most patients who have a recent diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT. However, occasionally, intravenous contrast agent administration may be required during the procedure to define the vascular structures in the anticipated needle path (Fig. 6).
Locating the Needle Entry Site
Table position of the most suitable axial image is noted for marking the biopsy plane. The patient is moved in the CT gantry at the same table position and this level is marked over the patient's skin with the help of a laser light emitted from the scanner (Fig. 7). To calculate the distance from the midline of the CT gantry to the anticipated skin entry site and the lesion depth, the grid superimposition technique is used (1). The skin entry site is marked using a measuring scale and the laser light, in correspondence to midline (Fig. 7). The skin entry site may be marked with an inedible marker or, if inedible marker is not available, an impression may be created over skin with the back of the needle hub (Fig. 7). After cleaning the area, a small plastic marker or hypodermic needle is placed on the skin mark and a scan is obtained at that level for confirmation (Fig. 8) (7). Next, a local anesthetic is injected and if required, a small skin incision is made with a no. 11 scalpel.
Sterile Drape as Needle Holder
A sterile drape can be fashioned to hold the needle and to maintain the desired needle angulation. This technique is especially useful when skin to pleura depth is short, resulting in poor fixing force (Fig. 9) (7). A sterile drape may also be used to support the needle when needle entry ranges from the lateral aspect of the chest wall in the supine or prone position (Fig. 10).
Needle Manipulation
During lung biopsies, the guiding needle is placed in the soft tissue of the chest wall and all necessary adjustments should done to align the needle perfectly with the target lesion prior to piercing the pleura (Fig. 5) (6). All the needle manipulations, even those in the chest wall, should be performed with the patient in the designated breath hold. The anticipated path of the needle is traced on the CT console by extrapolating the needle towards the lesion or it may be depicted by the beam hardening artifact produced by the needle tip. Thereafter, the needle is advanced in one stroke into the lung till the lesion margin in peripherally situated lesions, or at least 1-2 cm inside the lung. Leaving at least 1-2 cm needle inside the lung parenchyma avoids slipping of the needle into the pleural space during respiratory motion and prevents needle tip laceration of pleura. This is especially important in cases of lower lung areas where the target moves significantly and the minimum needle indwelling depth has been suggested to be 1.5 cm for the lower lobes and 1.0 cm for the upper lobes (6). After entry into lung, the needle should be left to rock freely with respiration and should be touched only during the designated breath hold.
While ultrasound guided lung biopsy may be more suitable for peripheral lung masses or some mediastinal lesion provided an adequate acoustic window is available, smaller subpleural lesions usually require CT guidance. Small subpleural lesions are also difficult to biopsy because a short needle length inside the lung is unstable and can be easily dislodge during respiratory motion, resulting in tearing of the pleural surface (Fig. 11) (8). A tangential route has been preferred by some authors rather than a right angle path for sampling the subpleural lesions, as it offers greater needle stability and easier needle correction (Fig. 12) (9). Moore (6) has described a technique for sampling tiny subpleural nodules in which a perpendicular direct puncture is planned. He preferred a single needle technique and after the lesion is transfixed, the needle is passed through the whole diameter of the nodule and the patient is allowed to breathe. Then, in a single breath hold, the needle tip is pulled back to the center of the nodule, and the deep half of the nodule is repeatedly aspirated by using a pass length equal to the radius of the lesion. By following this method a longer length of needle will stay inside the lung parenchyma during breathing, which will provide a better anchoring and prevent needle dislodgment. To employ this technique with a coaxial system, first the guiding needle is advanced through the nodule and the patient is allowed to breathe. While sampling, the patient is asked to hold their breath and the guiding needle is withdrawn into the lesion. Sampling is then performed with the biopsy needle. And again, the guiding needle is readvanced through the nodule and the patient is allowed to breathe quietly.
Although reports show that there has been no correlation between the number of passes made with the incidence of pneumothorax (10), many authors have found that multiple punctures have been associated with increased chances of pneumothorax and procedure failure (6, 9). So to minimize complications, one should aim to puncture the pleura once only (6). Although the development of pneumothorax usually required abandoning the procedure, CT guided biopsy of lung lesions could be completed under stable pneumothorax if the lesion was close to the pleura (7).
Correcting Needle Trajectory
The needle should be advanced in a stepwise manner from the skin to the lesion and the latest acquired scan should always be monitored for further planning as there are various types of movements which can change lesion location during the procedure (patient movement, cardiac and respiratory motion, development of pneumothorax). Hence, in many cases, a corrective manipulation of the needle is required either due to the change in the lesion location or if the initial puncture is imperfect. The "bevel steering" technique has been used with thinner gauge flexible needles having a single bevel tip (4, 6). This technique is based on the principle that a beveled needle has the tendency to drift in the direction away from the beveled side because the bevel side faces more tissue resistance (4). So to direct a beveled needle towards the lesion, it should be partially withdrawn and readvanced after rotating the bevel side away from the lesion. The skin and soft tissue adjacent to the puncture site can also be dragged away from the lesion to torque the needle further, hence increasing the amount of steering.
To correct the course of relatively stiff needles like larger gauge needles or a guiding needle of the coaxial systems, the needle is partially withdrawn and the needle tip is redirected by pushing the hub in the desired direction while applying fulcrum-like pressure at the skin surface (6). Then, the needle is re-advanced towards the lesion while maintaining it in the desired angulation. While manipulating the needle in the lung, withdrawal and re-advancement of the needle tip through the pleura should be avoided (6). To correct cranio-caudal misalignment of the needle tip in the lung, varying the designated breath hold may bring the lesion in the needle path. For example, if the lesion is cranial to the needle tip, the partial withdrawal of the needle in the periphery of the lung followed by a larger inspiration and re-advancement may correct the position (6).
Sometimes, despite careful needle insertion, the guiding needle of a coaxial system reaches slightly outside the margin of the lesion instead of hitting it. In such cases, a small amount of course correction in cranio-caudal or medial-lateral direction can be achieved at the time of sampling (6). The hub of the guiding needle pushed in the desired direction, followed by sampling with the inner biopsy needle is performed while maintain the guiding needle in the desired angulation (Fig. 13). This maneuver is helpful for bringing smaller lesions in the biopsy path and sometimes for avoiding vascular structures (7). Similarly, small tilting movements may be done while cutting multiple tissue cores from a lesion, and specimens is obtained from different areas of the same lesion.
Oblique Approach
If a bony structure is in the way of a planned trajectory, various maneuvers can be helpful such as changing the position of the patient's arm, taking a more medial or lateral path, rotating the patient, puncturing the patient from the opposite side if feasible, and varying the designated respiration (6). Lesions which cannot be targeted due to an intervening bone or vascular structure can also be approached using angled insertion of the biopsy needle in the z-axis (Fig. 14). Simultaneous angling of the CT gantry in the plane of the needle will help in the visualization of the entire needle and the target lesion in one CT section (Fig. 15) (11). Coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstructions are very valuable especially while employing an oblique approach and obtaining help in deciding the required angulation and choosing the skin entry site.
Scan Parameters
During the procedure, low dose 2.5-5.0 mm axial scans are usually sufficient to monitor the advancement of the needle and for the detection of any complications. Decreasing the tube current to 30-50 mAs resulted in a marked reduction of the total radiation dose to the patient (7). During all check scans, at least one superior and one inferior CT section to the needle tip was required.
CT Fluoroscopy
CT fluoroscopy is a technical advancement which enables real-time visualization of a lesion during needle manipulation (Fig. 16) (12). This technique is especially useful for targeting small lung lesions, juxtraphrenic lesions, and patients with poor breath holding capacity. CT fluoroscopy is more accurate than conventional CT in diagnosing pulmonary lesions with a significant reduction in complication rates (12). Additional advantages are the simplification of the biopsy process and decreased procedure time. However, this technique is associated with a small radiation to the operator and the mean estimated effective doctor dose ranging from 0.025 to 0.054 mSv per procedure (12, 13). Although CT fluoroscopy is available on most of the newer CT scanners, this facility is not available on many of the older CT scanners.
Anatomical Considerations for Different Approaches
Parasternal Approaches to the Mediastinal Lesions
The parasternal approach is used for the biopsy of anterior and middle mediastinal lesions when the lesion can be targeted from the lateral margin of the sternum (5). In this approach, the needle was inserted directly into the target lesion or through the intervening fat. The patient is usually placed in the supine position; however, sometimes the lateral decubitus position may be helpful for creating a safe window. The internal thoracic vessels should always be identified as they are located lateral to sternal margin and inadvertent injury may result in hematoma formation. In most cases, a needle is inserted close to the lateral margin of the sternum and medial to these vessels (Fig. 17). Sometimes, needle could be inserted lateral to the internal thoracic vessels if the lesion or the mediastinal fat was touching the anterior chest wall sufficiently lateral to the vessels (Fig. 18). Moreover, the degree of contact between the mediastinum and the parasternal chest wall may vary with breathing during the biopsy procedure, resulting in the inadvertent transgression of the pleura or lung (Fig. 19).
Paravertebral Approach to the Mediastinal Lesions
The paravertebral approach is usually used for obtaining a biopsy from the middle, posterior mediastinal and subcarinal lesions (5). The needle is advanced through the space between the endothoracic fascia and parietal pleura, usually from the right side. The presence of the aorta makes this approach difficult from the left side. The patient may be positioned in the prone, prone oblique, or lateral decubitus position. In some patients, the space between the endothoracic fascia and parietal pleura is wide enough for the direct advancement of the biopsy needle (Fig. 20). However, in others, this extrapleural space needs to be sufficiently widened by injection of saline solution to create a window for needle entry (Fig. 21). Advancing the needle from the paravertebral approach without displacing the parietal pleura off the spine, may lead to inadvertent transgression of pleura and lung. In addition, the paravertebral approach has the potential risk of injury to the esophagus, azygos vein, paravertebral vessels, intercostals vessels and nerves, as well as the spinal and vagus nerves. Other approaches described for mediastinal lesions are transsternal, suprasternal and the subxiphod approach; however, we rarely employed them at our institution.
Transpulmonary Approach to the Mediastinal Lesions
A transpulmonary path is employed when a mediastinal lesion could not be approached by the extrapleural route (Figs. 22, 23) (5). Patient positioning is achieved based on lesion accessibility and other precautions are same as a lung biopsy. The needle passes through the lung parenchyma and two layers of visceral pleura.
Approach to Lung Lesion
Generally the shortest intercostal route is taken during lung biopsies, avoiding fissures, bullous lesions and emphysematous areas (9). Sometimes, lung masses have associated collapsed or consolidated lung. Use of intravenous contrast is helpful in this setting as a mass usually enhances less than the collapsed lung tissue, and vascular markings of the lung parenchyma are not seen coursing through the mass (Fig. 24). If a non-aerated route to a lung lesion is possible, it is preferable as it reduces the chances of pneumothorax (6). It may be through an area of contact of mass with the pleura or mediastinal fat (Figs. 25, 26). From a cavitary lesion, biopsy is obtained from the lesion wall; however, in the presence of internal content like suspected fungal ball, biopsy can be obtained from the cavity wall as well as from the ball-like lesion (Fig. 27) (14).
Complications
Despite observing all precaution complications may occur, hence early detection of complications and timely management are important. The patient's vitals and the latest acquired scans are carefully monitored. Pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemothorax and chest wall hematoma are the most commonly encountered complications (2-4, 15, 16). Other infrequently reported complications are hemomediastinum, cardiac tamponade, air embolism, vasovagal reaction, surgical emphysema, and tumor seeding (3, 16).
The reported incidence of post-biopsy pneumothorax ranged from 27% to 54% in most of the large series (Figs. 28, 29) (1, 15). Most of these cases were managed conservatively; however, about 3-15% of patients required a 6 to 10.3-F chest tube placement if pneumothorax became symptomatic or continued to increase (1, 15, 16). In our experience, we also found that the majority of pneumothoraces were small and stable; and only less than 1% cases of pneumothorax required intervention. Whenever lung is punctured, the patients should be placed in a "biopsy side down" position for at least 1 hour immediately after completing the procedure and the patient should remain in the recumbent position for the next 4 hours. Although some of the authors have reported no benefits of putting patients in the "biopsy down position", this has been advocated by many others (6, 9, 15, 16). The rationale behind this maneuver is reducing the aeration of the punctured lung, resulting in the reduction of alveolar-to-pleural pressure gradient at the puncture site and accumulation of hemorrhagic fluid around needle path with an early sealing of the puncture tract (8, 15). No special post procedure positioning was required if lung was not transgressed. A blood patch technique has also been described to reduce chances of pneumothorax (6, 16). It required the injection of about 2-4 cc of patient's blood in the peripheral 2 cm of the needle tract, while removing guiding needle from the lung parenchyma.
Pulmonary hemorrhage may occur with or without hemoptysis. While hemorrhage is recorded in 5.0-16.9% cases, it manifests as hemoptysis in only 1.2-5.0% patients (2). If hemoptysis occurs, patients should be reassured and placed in the decubitus position with biopsy side down to prevent aspiration of blood in other areas of the lung (Fig. 29). In most of cases, hemoptysis is self limiting and settles down with conservative treatment; however, massive hemoptysis is the most dreaded complication of a lung biopsy and should be promptly treated. The risk of pulmonary hemorrhage increases in chronic inflammatory cavities due to the presence of hypertrophied bronchial arteries, vascular tumors, centrally located lesions, use of a cutting biopsy needle, pulmonary hypertension, and a deranged coagulation profile (6). In vascular lesions and in patients with bleeding disorders, small caliber needles should be used to reduce the risk of severe hemorrhage (6).
An air embolism is a very rare complication of PCNB, and it may affect the cerebral or coronary circulation (17). The probable mechanisms include either pulling of ambient air into the pulmonary vein via the biopsy needle, or by the formation of a broncho-venous fistula from the needle path or removed tissue core. Predisposing factors for air embolisms are coughing during the procedure, biopsy of consolidated lung, cavitary or cystic lesions, an associated vasculitis and use of a co-axial technique (9, 17). To prevent an air embolism the guiding needle should never be left without the inner stylet. During exchange of inner stylet with the biopsy needle, the hub of the guiding needle should be covered with the finger or thumb (7).
Significant chest wall hematoma and hemothorax are rare, but may develop if the intercostal or internal mammary arteries are injured during the biopsy procedure (Fig. 30). Pneumorrhachis, the presence of intraspinal air, has been rarely reported after anesthetic interventions (18). A single case of pneumorrhachis has been reported following chest tube insertion (18). We have observed this phenomenon in one patient, most likely due to the pulling of air through the nerve root sleeve and into the spinal canal (Fig. 31).
SUMMARY
In this pictorial review, we have presented various technical and anatomical aspects useful during biopsy of mediastinal and lung lesions. Familiarity of the operator with these methods will be helpful in obtaining adequate tissue material while minimizing complications.
References
- 1.Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology. 1996;198:715–720. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, Miller R, Moss H, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58:920–936. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cham MD, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Biopsy procedures of the lung, mediastnum, and chest wall. In: Kandarpa K, Machan L, editors. Handbook of interventional radiologic procedures. 4th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. pp. 478–485. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cham MD, Lane ME, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Lung biopsy: special techniques. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:335–349. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1081278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gupta S, Seaberg K, Wallace MJ, Madoff DC, Morello FA, Jr, Ahrar K, et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal lesions: different approaches and anatomic considerations. Radiographics. 2005;25:763–788. doi: 10.1148/rg.253045030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moore EH. Technical aspects of needle aspiration lung biopsy: a personal perspective. Radiology. 1998;208:303–318. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tsai IC, Tsai WL, Chen MC, Chang GC, Tzeng WS, Chan SW, et al. CT-guided core biopsy of lung lesions: a primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1228–1235. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kinoshita F, Kato T, Sugiura K, Nishimura M, Kinoshita T, Hashimoto M, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy using a puncture site-down positioning technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:926–932. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wallace AB, Suh RD. Percutaneous transthoracic nnedle biopsy:special considerations and techniques used in lung transplant recipients. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21:247–258. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-861559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, Aquino SL, Choplin RH. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology. 1999;212:165–168. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl33165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, Hirota T, Nishimura T. Percutaneous needle biopsy for small lung nodules beneath the rib under CT scan fluoroscopic guidance with gantry tilt. Chest. 2004;126:744–747. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology. 2001;220:161–167. doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl29161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim GR, Hur J, Lee SM, Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Nam JE, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:232–239. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bandoh S, Fujita J, Fukunaga Y, Yokota K, Ueda Y, Okada H, et al. Cavitary lung cancer with an aspergilloma-like shadow. Lung Cancer. 1999;26:195–198. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Collings CL, Westcott JL, Banson NL, Lange RC. Pneumothorax and dependent versus nondependent patient position after needle biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1999;210:59–64. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR. 2011;196:W678–W682. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hare SS, Gupta A, Goncalves AT, Souza CA, Matzinger F, Seely JM. Systemic arterial air embolism after percutaneous lung biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:589–596. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oertel MF, Korinth MC, Reinges MH, Krings T, Terbeck S, Gilsbach JM. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of pneumorrhachis. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 5):636–643. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0160-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]