Dear Editors:
We read with great interest the dispute (1) about the paper by Lalitha et al. (2) that was published in the September/October 2011 issue of the Korean Journal of Radiology, partially agreeing with the criticisms that were raised (1).
Sonoelastography evaluation of the supraspinatus tendon can be considered easy to do from a practical point of view. However, its outcome becomes highly unreliable at the periphery of the image, where the applied compression force is markedly reduced due to the curvilinear course of the tendon. This can be clearly seen in Figure 4 of the paper (2), where sonoelastography demonstrated a patchy pattern (blue on the left, green on the right) in a supposedly healthy supraspinatus tendon (although the sonoelastography image does not represent the same coronal section shown on the magnetic resonance image). This unreliability is also partially witnessed by the fact that no papers have been published in peer-reviewed journals about this specific topic. Also, while Achilles tendons can be scanned with the patient lying prone on a bed at complete rest (3), the supraspinatus tendon must be fully extracted from its physiological position to be scanned. This implies that the patient should put his hand in his backpocket or behind his back so that the tendon is in tension. Both conditions cannot be reliably reproduced in different subjects. Finally, we note that Lalitha and his colleagues scanned more than 300 normal and abnormal tendons with some magnetic resonance correlation (1), but this seems not to be enough to draw any reliable conclusion about the role of sonoelastography in this setting.
Sonoelastography evaluation of soft tissue focal nodules in different rheumatologic conditions has been reported (4). However, a random scanning of soft tissue lesions of different origins seems to be senseless. While it can seem intuitive that a ganglion cyst has different elasticity compared to surrounding soft tissues, what is the clinical value of such an observation? How can the similar patchy appearance of a ganglion cyst Figure 11 of the paper [2] and an ulnar neuritis Figure 14 of the paper [2] (2) be explained? A pictorial essay should be aimed at reviewing imaging features that have already been established and not at presenting a series of random cases encountered in daily routine.
References
- 1.Srinivasan S, Dubey N. Re: Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:646. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.5.646. author reply 647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lalitha P, Reddy MCh, Reddy KJ. Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:365–375. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography in the evaluation of painful Achilles tendon in amateur athletes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:373–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Bartolini B, Garlaschi G, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography may help in the differential diagnosis between rheumatoid nodules and tophi. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:144–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]